No Man's Sky is going to flop so hard and it's a shame because the idea has such potential...

No Man's Sky is going to flop so hard and it's a shame because the idea has such potential. They're gonna get a shit ton of sales on release day and players will hate it and tell their friends and they won't sell any more copies a week after launch. Let me tell you why; it all boils down to gameplay:


You won't be able to:
>even find other players

It's the fucking dissapaintment of the year

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noctis
anynowhere.com/bb/posts.php?t=409
archive.is/USOA9
archive.is/V3PvY
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

No, no it doesn't.

Fuck off shill. We all know a shit game is shit, no one came here to see your shitty threads clogging up the catalogue with astroturfing.

It will probably be shit, but I've always hated this.

It's not a "dissapaintment" since we all knew it would be shit.

Yes you can. It just disappears when you leave. You can still alter it.

We know you can learn language and do trading.

Yes you can. You just cannot chat with them. They said if the demand for more multiplayer they would develop it more beyond that once it launches.

Because you've played the game. We know you can upgrade stuff, we don't know how far or to what extent.

Shit thread.

The shills are out in full force today.

So you hate inductive reasoning?
Sound pretty retarded.

Wew. You might be even more stupid than OP.

A multiplayer game where you are unable to communicate with other players until they add the feature. That is absolutely fucking retarded, something like that should be out on the release day.

And you're one of the shills.

OK kid.


Dark Souls.

Flag was unintentional.


They can't even get the control and character movement right, you're asking too much.

Every thread until release.

I like atmosphere and exploration so I'll probably pick it up down the road when it's cheaper and get some enjoyment out of itand if DX11 for Wine ever comes out

As early as the interview with Pope and Joel Mchale they said none of that was in the game. The planets will probably not have enough variety but faulting the game for stuff generally unrelated to its concept is pretty fuckin' gay

Just pirate it, you retard.

I feel the concept could be good. But I like yours less then the original idea about racing to the center of the galaxy.

Also pre orders alone say this is already a "success".

Yeah! Who wants to explore a galaxy!?
Just nerds n queers, amiright?


The only not retarded comment.


Yes we get it, it's a "popular" game so as such we must instantly dislike it. Still there are two games I've always wanted that have never been made.

Neither of these will ever happen, but I'm still cautiously optimistic about no mans sky, the trick is done get swept up in hype, and remember that this is an indie game. Lower expectations.

Or is this another thing that's secretly a console shit flinging contest because "ps4 only, also on PC"?

In any case, sage for shit thread

Dark Souls is equally retarded but irrelevant to this thread.

People play that singleplayer focused game for the tacked on multiplayer?

I guess marketing did need to sell extra copies to the "social experience" audience, but still.

I know right, why would they lie about anything?

Also, in dark souls the lack of communication serves a propose by limiting coordination between allies and forcing people to rely on written messages for certain things.
On the apparent context of this game, it makes no fucking sense.


The multiplayer seems to be there to add replayability mostly.

That's weird because I tried it and got extremely bored after an hour. How are a few minutes worth of cock fights with someone supposed to be fun? The reason the game exists is so you can play through the world, fighting the bosses and exploring the areas, while piecing together the little story that exists to put you into context. It's a complete video game. The multiplayer is like one tenth of a video game, and doesn't stand alone unless you play video games in 30 minute bursts once a week.

Retard do you even know what a shil is.

Invasion adds a layer of unpredictability to the game. It also gives a propose to a lot of weapons and rings that aren't as useful for PVE.
I'm not a fan of the game though, I mainly enjoy the world crafting, the combat is a bit shallow and borderline wonky at times.

Isn't it basically a copy of some guy's freeware game? Noctis III or something?

Massive immersion breaking, when I'm playing video games (a personal hobby), and other real people butt in and interfere with my happy funtimes. I play video games so I don't have to be around or interacting with other people, the last thing I want is someone disturbing the little free time I have.

Then play in offline mode. It has that you know.

I cracked the game anyway. I'm just struggling to see the point of having a game where the developers designed the content (instead of the players being the content) and then playing it for the players.

The idea has potential but it will only ever be that, an idea. They'll never manage to actually make a satisfying game using the idea.

It's sort of like communist or socialism, good on paper but horrible in practice

ew
Anyway, weren't you faggohomoniggerqueerjewspics all over this game when it was first announced? As soon as I saw the announcement trailer, my impression was

I guess you're thinking of Space engine. Not really a copy, Space engine looks better in some aspects, but has no gameplay aspects to it. NMS seems to have similar movement, with some single weapon/multitool thing shoved in for the on-foot aspect and some very basic AI spread around the worlds.


You're getting an option. The multiplayer isn't limiting your singleplayer experience, it is there for anyone who wants to play the game like that. Options that don't interfere with the rest of the game are always a good thing (well, within reasonable limits and as long as they aren't limiting the resources for the rest of the game too much).

Not yet. And if this was an isolated example, it wouldn't. But thanks to people who play video games because they love video games autistically and are the only enjoyable thing in life to them no longer being the target audience of video games, this sets an example that others follow, and there are less and less good singleplayer games being made because everyone is chasing after multiplayer and social experiences now. On the small scale, it doesn't hurt here. But on the big picture, it is a trend affecting video games overall and continuing to shrink the number of good games being made.

...

Never heard of Space Engine before. I looked up Noctis for you, turns out it has a Wikipedia page:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noctis
anynowhere.com/bb/posts.php?t=409
I played it ages ago. Even named a few planets if memory serves.

Nah, I knew it was going to be shit from the first time I saw it. Anyway, communism on paper is the most efficient and fair way to run things. The problem is that humans aren't robots and someone will always fuck up the system, making it unsuitable for a governing system.

This.
If humans were ants it would work, because essentially all ants are communist.

Capitalism and republicanism are the best imo.

Dark souls, journey, every modern co-op based multiplayer game with this generation's community


ants are monarchist. They serve their queen.

Not really, the queen doesn't 'order' anything. Ants are more like a literal hivemind

Just nerds n queers, amiright?

That's the thing though, it sounds cool, but the problem with infinity randomly generated worlds is that after a while, everything just sort of feels the same, this is notable in games like Minecraft. In order for a game like that to be saved, there needs to be something in the form of a really great game underneath it to save it.

But NMS doesn't seem to have any of that. It looks more like a tech demo than a truly realized game. Especially since the only thing there seems to be able to do in the game is >Explore the next planet thats basically the same as the last one but a different color

Which would be fine if it was a budget price release that you play to unwind after work and maybe put on a podcast or your favorite songs in the background, but near $60? No fucking way man.

Well I invite you guys to Holla Forums if you wanna be despooked. First of all communism doesn't even have a government, it's not central planning.

i never understood the appeal, not a single piece of promotional footage for this game looked fun, everything was just

Holla Forums is magnitudes more retarded than Holla Forums.

Not to mention the combat sucks. Cubeworld was uncomplete shit and the maps were boring as fuck, but the combat was at least solid and well made, it needed more content, but it was functional.


You wonder around doing passive stuff. For example, the language thing that other user mentioned before? Go find some monolith of sort with phrases of X language, the more you find, the more you can interact with the different societies… which, by the way, is limited to a menu and trading hubs, you basically have to "collect" monoliths to be able to enter a trade menu at some big ship and/or tower (or similar construction). You trade to upgrade your suit and ship. The upgrades are fairly basic, stuff to let you land on very cold planets (that in spite of being literally frozen rocks have plenty of regular grass on top) or getting a jet pack.
They also shoved in some puzzles on computers, the simple numeric puzzle gives you the positions of some useful landmarks on the planet (like those monoliths or teletransportation gates).
You roam around to be able to roam around more and faster. Absolute game design failure. The whole game is like that and the combat is utter shit.

I don't understand how they fucked up so much. They have advertised it as open-ended while at the same time kept on reinforcing a singular way to play, which happens to be exploration and accumulating resources through trading, pirating, or scavenging. It's also a shame that exploration system is skin-deep because they offer no reason to stay. I was also impressed with the RNG system until it was pointed out to me that the worlds have no environmental diversity like on Earth and how similar everything looks.

i think to myself "who would find that fun" but people love minecraft, but at least minecraft has some room for autistic creativity

Even MC combat looks better. I was going to make a webm of the latest video showing some combat, but it is too much work for this shit game.
This thing also seems to have worse progression that MC… and MC progression was shit. It is like a 3D version of current Starbound but without shitty quest and decade-old memes.

Pretty much every publicly released version of Minecraft to ever exist has deeper everything than NMS, and Minecraft has some grave design issues. But it can be comfy sometimes.

good thing robots and automation are coming in and cutting down on errors

when self-driving trucks become unleashed, shit's going to hit the fan HARD

Yeah, I'm sure that shipping companies are going to automate all of their trucks and totally not worry about them crashing and killing people. Or people boxing the trucks in, forcing them to stop and them looting them.

Considering that semis are regularly hijacked as is, once the trucks are automated to stop for obstacles stealing from them will be even easier.

It's another good idea of paper, but incredibly shitty whence it is actually applied to real world situations.

No mans sky aka Game: On rails.

...

So is our only hope for Elite Dangerous to fix its shit and get some actual content going on? We all know $tar Citizen is not a thing.

Holla Forums is far less crazy than Holla Forums but far less funny. That's why no one likes you. Also a revolution will never succeed just like the day of the rope will never succeed. Humanity adapts to subtle changes, not "great leaps forward".

In Canada some people here are campaigning to have a basic living wage for all Canadian citizens (by all means a communist idea) but it isn't happening through revolution.

sage for marxist kike propoganda

Communism REQUIRES centralized government you mong.

That really does look awful up close

And I'm watching this on a 2 and a half inch wide window on my phone

if it's cheaper than the previous method, then it doesn't even matter if the service/job is done in a quality matter

if an automated burger flipper is cheaper than paying a high school kid / college graduate $15 per hour, you bet your ass that they're going to go for the cheaper method. it also doesn't help that people already have low standards when it comes to fast food.

archive.is/USOA9
archive.is/V3PvY


Holla Forums is like a more autistic and cucked version of /lit/ that fails to understand that all of their memes are unfunny and forced as fuck

You're not very subtle.

They've built themselves up so much that the entire game will be either too big or too small in both size and content. It'd be a miracle if they managed to pull of the right balance

Also
for shame OP

It won't work for trucking. If me an a friend can stop a truck transporting several hundred cases of whiskey and steal all of it with little risk to ourselves then there will be a massive incentive to do it.

What is the robot truck going to do? Drive over us? Pout loudly as we steal it's booty?

Doesn't help that fast food joints are frequented by poor people. KFC has to keep prices low and their food is already so shit that the only way to cut costs is to get rid of jobs.

You'll never see kiosks at Starbucks.

self driving trucks would me much more difficult to rob, there is no physical driver you could force to open the back.
law enforcement response would be autonomous, and the huge savings on hiring could be spend on insurance/better protection from theft.

The same thing that a person driving a truck would do?

If two guys wave down a semi on the road, it will probably stop rather than run them over. You hold the guy at gunpoint, and he will just wait till you are gone then call the cops unless you kill him

Presumably a robot truck would stop when you step out in front of it, then call the cops, now with GPS tracking, and set off alarms as soon as it detects that it is being fucked with. Only with the robot truck it would be taking pictures of you the whole time because that is how it drives.

Most people wouldn't defend their cargo if they are not prepared for being attacked and believe their lives would be in danger if they tried to protect their cargo. I don't see how a normal truck would be any more secure than a self driving one.

Meant for

Daily reminder No Man's Sky was originally a PC exclusive.

this is correct

I honestly never wanted that shit, it was obviously a stupid project from the get go handled by a bunch of hacks. Evidence just keeps proving those initial presumptions.

In order for it to flop it'd have to actually come out :^)

So? There's a shitton of games that do that already. Why is it such a bad thing that this isn't Minecraft in space?

Also, how can you be disappointed if you expect it to be shit? Besides the pretentious journos being pretentious about this game I don't see why this game has you by the knickers. Most complaints I see here is people being mad that it's not something it isn't trying to be.

I wonder how bad an isolated nationalist government could mess up those plans?

I have no idea why people are excited for a procedural generated walking simulator. Games that rely on procedural generation for their content always end up boring since you see all of what it has to offer in a few hours.

ALWAYS ONLINE

This.

Procedural generation isn't as good or advanced as devs make it out to be.

/thread

You’re basically retarded if you’ve been hoodwinked by the “HURR ROBOTS WILL DO ALL JOBS” bullshit.

pretty badly, government fucking with markets is the reason why automation is being pushed to the forefront, its a response to increased labor costs and to an uncompetitive union-infected workforce.

Nationalist governments would presumably cripple immigration, thus isolating the workforce, and in turn fail at competing in global markets.


robots will take over your jobs if the cost of paying you is more expensive than your work output. (look at the automotive industry).

You’re missing literally the only important thing:
IF THE ROBOT CAN EVEN DO IT IN THE FIRST PLACE.

the development of heuristic methods such as neural networks, and the massive amount of research being done on deep thinking neural networks means almost all jobs are liable to be replaced.

I don't know about that. I've spent many hours in space engine and I still feel I haven't seen everything there is to see. I've played Starflight for countless hours and I still think it's fun to explore planets. Elite was procedurally generated and that was still fun.

When it comes to things of this scale it's impossible to do it by hand. I don't think you'll see everything in the first hours if they do it right. The trick is to simply weight the generation algothrim to make some things more rare than others. That's not really a problem. The problem with procedurally generated games is that players will begin to recognise the patterns. But in that regard it's not much different from open world AAA games that due to how they are made also rely heavily on patterns.

Take Skyrim's dungeons for example, they're all pretty much the same overall but they're still handmade. They all rely on much the same assets and the same design pattern. In the first two TES games all non essential dungeons were procedurally generated and if you ask me they were more fun to explore because their pattern weren't as obvious. That's because they were more complex, something allowed by procedural generation.

People keep repeating this bullshit without any actual evidence. Their timeframes are bullshit, their claims of capability are bullshit, and battery technology refusing to advance will ensure that even if they do magically (yes, magically) get the ability to replace as much as they say, it won’t be implementable.

...

Thinking machines? They're a pipedream.

Holy fucking shit, you’re clinically mentally ill.

look up google's alpha go AI, look up graphene batteries.
scientific improvement is moving at an exponential rate, already the following industries have been mostly automated:
automotive, shipping and handling.
this was done without using heuristic methods.
now 2 new industries are liable to be replaced thanks to the new heuristic developments, transportation, logistics and airlines (the first of which employs 4,640.3K people
in the united states)

I completely agree on your point when u say infinitely generated planets.
Although, if you understand procedural generation, and how it's possible to inject uniqueness; it's possible to counteract this to a limited extent with low overhead, but to expand beyond the normal scope would incur some demanding overhead.
I can't say whether or not they've implemented a system to do this beyond "go to the center of the galaxy" which is probably simple version of this, but it is certainly possible to create a sense of nuance often if it's not a universe so big it might as well be an "infinite" universe.
Imo, it's better to approach it from a more limited scope, as you're completely right; it's essentially a tech demo at this point (as imo they've encountered "content creep").

I completely agree.
What they have is a fucking awesome looking tech demo (I want to look at their source code personally), but the underlying game mechanics looks lackluster.
With their main focus being exploration it doesn't really fit my playstyle or many others in there (I like making a home on a planet f.e.).


The reason they do that is because when you're transitioning from space -> planet the orientation of the "chunks" are changed from spherical -> plane or torus.
When the orientation changes (you can see the enhanced re-entry effects here too), it switches to this orientation.
This makes it easier to render terrain without odd stretching/artifacts with the algorithm they're using.


We've still got a ways off from a crisis, and AI implementations to automate those industries has been in development for decades.

This is a highly specialized AI.
The sole purpose it was built for was to play GO, and it uses algorithms that date back to the 80s/90s. It's just quite powerful, and has a very efficent algorithm, with a good set of training data (I.e. it was trained to play well, probably based on the data from the person it was playing against as to predict even their own patterns).

And?
What we're waiting for is the mainstream production of stable and affordable room-temperature super conducting materials.
This will prompt major advancements in both the private, and public sector; in addition to making previously unreachable technologies within grasp.

The only despooking I want is the Moonman kind

While this is neat and something I personally would enjoy I don't see how you can get this to make any sense from a gameplay perspective. Most games are very dependant on the player traversing environments or levels. Even when player housing has some uses it's always still fairly pointless.

That's why far superior games that DON'T suck exist

Please tell me this isn't real

Personally, I think that the problem lies in treating procedural generation as a goal or draw in and of itself, as opposed to just one tool in the box. I've noticed this difference with a lot of technological fads in entertainment, actually.

Consider 3D movies. Avatar actually took advantage of the 3D camera as a tool throughout the live portion of the movie, shot for shot, to get a different feel than 2D would deliver, even in scenes of low action. This also made the switch to the full CG parts of the movie less jarring. But when the 3D craze followed it, nobody really used it as a cinematic tool again, just as a way to throw in an effect to wow the audience. And now it's mostly died out and the assumption the studios have is that fickle audiences just lost interest, which is sort of true, but it's true because they shoehorned 3D into movies where it didn't really fit in the hopes of a quick cash in.

I think VR is at risk of the same thing actually. Developers generally aren't attempting to make good games better with VR as a tool, they're trying to make VR: The Game. Which apparently is mostly limited to linear jumpscare corridors and/or flailing retard simulators. If somebody doesn't get on the ball and make an actually good game, it'll die when the novelty-seeker audience leaves.

Anyway, getting back to my original point, No Man's Sky seems like it will end up being the example of being Procedural Generation: The Game, instead of an actual game. But unlike VR or 3D movies, or Kinect, etc., procedural generation in moderate, considered doses already has a long history of use as an effective tool in games.

Battery technology has been advancing. Just because your phone is using up more battery as better ones become available doesn't mean batteries don't advance.

No matter how much battery technology advances it doesn't keep up with the energy demands of phones. I use an old dumbphone and it goes at least a week between charges. How have things moved backwards?

...

😝

Procedural generation is what you make it. Having random-noise generated heightmap with some randomised enemies and skins is lazy and uninteresting. Compare that with the sort of history that Dwarf Fortress generates for its worlds and you can easily see how NMS falls short of doing anything compelling. It's going to be a galaxy of bland, forgettable worlds. I want to explore worlds and find out why they're like they are. Not go from resource node to resource node like some shitty easter egg hunt broken up by flying.

But doing anything actually compelling requires actual hard work, rather than focusing on art direction, 'you can do anything' marketing and getting upset when press ask you how fundamental mechanics work.

They will. Trucks will be the first road vehicle to be automated as they're the easiest and most valuable. They drive fixed routes between specific locations on roads that have been designed for trucks.
The vendor will deal with the liability. The future is Google choosing who to kill in an accident by summing up oppression points.
You live in a movie.

While I also have a dumb phone with 1 week battery (I used to have one with a month, but I fucked it up), a smartphone can also easily go a week on a battery charge if you don't use things like wifi and the like. The truth is just that most people don't mind charging every day if it enables them to do certain things like candy crush all fucking day. The improvements for batteries have just been used for more performance rather than longer usage, and most people have cared more about that than anything else.

Sony games don't sell poorly, their fanbase is at a point where even shit games can sell well. While this game isn't exclusively Sorny it's being promoted quite heavily by Sorny so it's gonna sell.

They showed the game No Mans Sky wishes it was at E3 during the PC showcase anyway, so whatever.

PLANET EXPLORERS

Doesn't help when the jews keep making smartphones thinner and thinner rather than using space gained from miniaturisation for additional battery volume.

?

It's from tumblr, of course they would celebrate a niggress fighten dem ebil honkeys

Agreed, battery life needs to fucking improve

no it doesnt. the tech they have shown so far had potential if they could actualy manage to put decent gameplay on top of it.

No it isn't. When you play offline, you don't share your "discoveries" (see: naming planets and shit).


Procedural generation can be used to compress information or to add information. This shit right here is doing the former, it has some pre-settings for everything it generates and you end up playing with variations of said procedural generation schemes.
Engines like outerra are using procedural generation to add detail and the end result is great. Same with the example given by . The problem with procedural generation is devs using it as a mean to reduce the workload. Proper game with heavy procedurally generated content needs a different approach and lots of dynamic elements to make it work.


The tech they have shown so far some decades old shit with slightly prettier graphics on top. Some of the laziest examples of planetary rendering I have seen.


That game does so many things right and so many things wrong. The procedurally generated maps are lazy as fuck, the combat is dull as shit and the control feels like utter crap. Everything else is actually really nice, if you get into decals and feathering, you can make a lot of different items/vehicles and buildings stuff is very flexible. A shame they can't put good combat into it.

Confirmed for having never read Hume. Induction is impossible.

I thought the naming was removed because beta testers kept naming everything penis.

The picture is from a clothes modeling photoshoot. The tumblr reaction is real.

Why are so many people on tumblr dumb as hell?

What a good sense of logic.

Because Tumblr is structurally and culturally designed to insulate its users from information that challenges their preconceptions.

Could you elaborate on that? I don't doubt that's exactly what they're doing, but how do they pull it off?

You have no idea what tumblr is, do you?

I really hate this somewhat new meme of thinking "colorful" means washed out horseshit that looks like a paintbrush rinse bucket put through a instagram filter.

The filter is what bothers me the most. The art style in general is inconsistent as fuck.

They should've waited until an event like E3, shown a video and then said it was on PSN right now.

It's been years. The hype is dead.

you CLEARLY do not know how to read

VIRAL MARKETING

Humans cause more accidents than robots do. Rates will go down not rise. It will undoubtedly happen, but the rates will infinitesimal. It's like SJWs and anti-gamer marxists who say videogames cause violence. Violence is at all time historic lows, and it's continuing to trend downward. Yet they harp and fear monger on.


This is prevented with real people driving how exactly?


Why exactly? You don't risk a driver's life, and automated anti-theft systems can kick in more quickly than a person held up at gunpoint.


You are a Luddite.

>EA fucked spore, thereby showing us that such a game will never exist because of jews

Call me crazy but i think the above issues might have something to do with how bad this thing will flop.

There is gameplay footage and it looks like utter crap. I have seen browser FPS with better movement, there is literally no feedback to getting hit other than the stupid blue (for some reason) light on the edge of the screen from which your character is taking damage. AI is definitely brain dead too and the gunplay is nonexistent, just different lazors that do different shit, but ultimately behave the same.

noit reeally. people who go to mcdonalds can be the most entitled shits ever and will yell at you for adding pickles or because you took 5 minutes too long.

the fact you know what tumblr is means you have interacted with them and thus have no beloing ing, get out.

It's almost like I've read this sort of pitch somewhere else…

Mo Nan's Sky should have just been an expansion to Space Engineers.

tumblr

This sums it up.

It looks like math, and not in a good way.

When you fly towards the planet, you can spot the repetition, the basic idea of the generation pattern.

Single biome planets might create unique planets, the devs are right about that. But how then are they going to make an entire planet interesting enough for you to want to explore more than just the area where you landed, knowing it's generated procedurally and all of it basically looks the same?

They confirmed there are no villages, towns, settlements or civilizations of any kind, just scattered buildings. And even this looks so… lifeless and bland.

Whatever you say faggoqueer

dropped, you can crawl back to your hugbox now

I'm actually going to agree with you on most of those aspects, a revolution . I think we're better at memeing than Holla Forums, we just have less to work with because Holla Forums has the outrage factor that we don't. All of Holla Forumss recent memes have been shit, on the other hand.


You'd have to tell Marx that because he thinks communism is by definition stateless, and guess who defined it? Marx.

Dunno about the quintillion thing, but Spore also had a lot of planets. Exploring them became boring very quickly.

but i'm already in it!

That's because that wasn't the focus of the game. Spore barely had any focus at all, which is why it ultimately failed. A "sim everything" was a really dumb idea, no matter how it would have turned out it would always be shallow. NMS doesn't seem to have the same problem, instead it seems like they have the opposite problem and only realised it late in development which is why the game got delayed.

There are people on this very board who believe Spore could have been great. Still.

Not true. The history of humanity includes both.

Small developments in technology over time lead to drastic social and economic change. Social and economic revolutions have occurred various times in the past, the last being the change from feudalism to capitalism. It wasn't instantaneous, but it was small changes leading to social upheaval on a large scale.

Look at the industrial revolution with its spinning machines and realise its similar to the coming automation of labour.

You can, actually.

Can't do that, but it's no big deal as this is not a building game.

You can. Unless by "meaningful way" you mean something else than what I'm thinking. Kinda vague.

You can, it's just that you have to do it manually. Not really a multiplayer focused game anyhow. But maybe that will effect that game's longevity, who knows.

A leveling system has already been confirmed. No one's sure what it's for yet though. It could just be an "rank" of sorts.
There's also the tool/suit/ship upgrade slots, but no one is quite sure how deep that goes.

The queen isn't the ruler she's just the designated gonads of the colony. She's the official pussy. Certain kind of ants can even have more than one queen.

Also No Trany Sky is a just StarForge 0.8a.

Ants aren't anything. They don't have the brainpower to have any kind of structure. Any cooperation or complexity is an illusion. What ants do is follow an extremely simple set of goals that only appears to have a unified purpose.

A lot of people would see two or more ants collectively moving a large food item toward their nest and think they are cooperating. They are not. They are following simple goals: "get food to nest" "do not attack ants from the same nest", which are actually more like: "get food to place that smells strongest" and "do not attack what smells like you". The fact is, the ants all have the same end goal, and are only tangentially aware of the presence of the others; they aren't helping each other or working together, because if that were the case it wouldn't be so inefficient.

Humans can effect something called "synergy", whereby two individuals can perform an action at more than twice the efficiency. Imagine there is a piece of furniture that is so heavy and large you can't lift it, but you are moving it across the room. You just have to push the thing across the carpet until it gets where you want it to be. If you brought three of your friends, you could collectively lift the thing up and move it across the room in only a few seconds. But imagine if your three friends instead just joined you in pushing it across the carpet? That would be pretty stupid, and also inefficient as it would take much more time and energy. That's what the ants are doing.

Ants are basically just a physical version of Conway's Game of Life.

Die kikes die

Be objective for once in your life.

We kill nation-wrecker kikes around 'ere

That pretty well sums up the current state of vidya. I'm not sure who to blame for this but it's probably Molyneux.

...

THEY'VE FINISHED

The USSR was pretty nice after Stalin removed the kikes.

You're a funny guy.

Literally no purpose in playing it

but the developers were being vague about it, that means there is!

What would you call capitalism then? In the USSR Soros would be in a labour camp, under capitalism he is one of the most influential people around. Under capitalism the world kiss the asses of Saudi sheiks, the commies would not have been subservient. Under capitalism nations mass import dindus for cheap labour, in the USSR the welfare of the workers were of utmost importance. The only less kike model is national socialism which brings class harmony and rejects the juden but comparing the USSR to the US or Europa of today I think it's clear in which society the kikes flourish.

Additionally, if you're looking for pure ideological kikery then it's liberalism you're after. Combined with capitalism that's what has shaped and formed of the bizarro world of today. Liberals are the decadent subhumans who have created this racially fucked fagtopia we live in.

except you simply replace the Jews getting into the private sector with them weaseling into the public sector. The ruling bureaucratic class would be filled with kikes in two generations tops. In the USSR the welfare of the workers was the least important aspect of the government because human life was entirely replaceable, much more than it is under capitalism because in capitalism you at least have diversification and specialization, in socialist communism that doesn't happen because then the specialized worker would be inherently more valuable than a general laborer, and that goes against the core ideologies. Instead of Soros and Rothschilds and Duponts owning the factories in the private sectors, they'd be high ranking government officials who owned the factories as part of their governmental positions; and as a result have even more control over the base class because they can manage many more aspects of the citizenry's lives directly.

I wonder if we can somehow link amerifats to the fact that anime became shit

They pretty much own the government so what's the difference exactly? The plutocrats already control the entire democratic process in the west.
This is what happened in the Soviet Union but the kikes were weeded out. The USSR enjoyed a functional version of democracy some time before its demise, isn't that more ideal than what we currently have?
Not really, I'm not well read enough to go into details but from what I understand there's nothing inherently in opposition to specialized workers in socialism.

there is because a specialized worker oftentimes requires training and advanced education, with the devaluation of humanity inherent in a socialist system (liberation of the proletariat from the bourgeoisie and intellectualista) means that everyone is a prole; you can't train a common worker in a specialized field because that creates a division between this person and the rest of the proles. So those who were trained were oftentimes either government-relatives or lottery winners.
With no intellectualista who aren't government sanctioned, base industries that require skills beyond fordist mass production ever preform in parity with capitalist systems, hence the soviet's reliance upon "heavy industry." There's a reason why soviets sciences and designs aped off of the nazis and Americans (who were also aping off of the nazis but c'est la vie) It's that soviet scientists were generally pretty terrible at designing things that weren't explicitly state sanctioned. There was no ability to commit resources (or scientists themselves, as they're still property of the state) to funding of research for topics that weren't state sanctioned, same thing with general production, the USSR had constant shortages of "luxury" goods like shoestrings and cigarettes because the government didn't care enough about luxury industries, it didn't have enough resources to divert to those projects to meet the demands.
as opposed to capitalist systems which allow for value to meet demand and signal to private enterprises who don't need to answer to powers that have other plans in mind that there is want for further production. This is referred to as a "guns vs. butter" dilemma.

America is kike nation number two, only Israel is more Jewish.

never preform in parity*

That still sounds a lot better than what we have. There's so many useless industries and jobs today that I'd happily see the end of them even if it meant a lack of luxury goods. There is so much nonsense work being done in the west just for the sake of it. We even work to justify doing more work with things such as planned obsolescence or advertising or what have you to create more demand. It's senseless.

Sorry, but America is kike nation number ONE. America contains all rich jews, while Israel contains only poor and desperate ones trying to carve themselves a living among kebabs. America uses them as scapegoats to explain all the stupid shit it does in Middle East - for some, they pretend that they defend Israel, for others they pretend that they are controlled by Israel and can't do anything about it.

M8, you've got the reason and the consequences ass backwards. Soviet science was hampered by state's distaste for certain things (genetics, cybernetics to name a few), and that in turn meant people were discouraged to advance in those fields, which in turn led to Soviets playing catch-up once those restrictions got lifted. Soviet scientists by themselves were by no means terrible.


Say it with me: planned economy. The plan gets approved like 2 or 3 years beforehand and doesn't get adjusted to suit the situation on hand, hence the shortages. Also pretty much all remotely valuable stuff was either stolen or sold-off to people in the know. Though cigaretttes were never in short supply, Prima and Belomorkanal were piss cheap to manufacture.

Actually, you are the one who gets things backwards. Genetics weren't hampered because state had distaste for them, state got distaste for them because Soviet geneticists were producing nothing but failure, all while Lysenko, despite being a bad scientist, produced actual, edible results.

As for cybernetics, back in the day they had nothing to do with computers, and Soviet computer science was actually doing pretty great until 60s, when some faggot got BRILLIANT idea to solve the lack of standardization by adopting obsolete American computer instead of commissioning a domestic design.

During fucking 30's before worldwide genetics research really got on the roll and past that repressions fucked over a lot of people able to teach it.


Which didn't hamper government propagandists not one bit even after it got associated with computers. Wasn't until the middle of 50's that it got fully rehabilitated.

Are you a fucking retard? Cybernetics was never associated with computers at that period. Sergei Lebedev got Stalin's Award for his MESM computer in 1950, and then worked on BESM series unmolested, and there was also a competing design in Strela computer series, and its designers also got Stalin's Award, albeit only in 1954.

Oh, and by the way, campaign against cybernetics was only going on in 1952-1955, and even the most ardent opponents of cybernetics were only attacking ideological aspects of it as "science about control of everything" - no one was denying importance of computers, and even the non-ideological parts of cybernetics were still taught as "theory of automatic control".

There have been channels for months, years even dedicated to speculating about this game, and they get views because "muh hype".

It's like people just want to be hyped about the game, then they pay for it and the game is shit, but they wanted the hype so that justifies the purchase for them after the fact.

A channel named "no mans sky gamer" and the game isn't even out yet.
How little self respect can you have?

And the mental gymnastics the fanboys go through to defend this shit that they know nothing about yet, thanks to the devs, and that isn't even out yet is some next level cuckoldry.

...

And authoritarians are subhumans that are responsible for the worst crimes in human history. And are also stupid faggots.

When Bethesda mad Skyrim:

When Ninytendo does ne Zelda

Same with No Man's Sky. If it was animu it would be worshiped. If it was made by big N, all you faggots would shit yourself with preorders.

Nu males sky.

Record set for longest development and for how many nu males can be fit into one picture.

I can smell the low-t through the screen.