Communists

hahahahaha oh wow it makes sense now

Other urls found in this thread:

marxists.org/archive/dunayevskaya/works/1941/ussr-capitalist.htm
quinterna.org/lingue/english/historical_en/maos_china_certified_copy.htm
robertlstephens.com/essays/shafarevich/001SocialistPhenomenon.html
ronpaul.com/on-the-issues/free-trade/
thephilosophicalsalon.com/a-reply-to-my-critics/
ronpaul.com/on-the-issues/border-security/
ronpaul.com/2015-06-26/ron-paul-it-shouldnt-be-up-to-the-state-to-define-marriage/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Good to know right wing neuroses never change.

the only neurotic is you

Do you even know where you are?

if the workers can run a company as good as the management does without the managers and directors and CEOs, why don't they? why isn't north korea a bastion of prosperity? why isn't venezuela prosperous while having the second largest oil reserves on the planet?

wtf is this shit

fat acceptance
not shaving legs/armpits
coloured hair
piercings, tattoos
basically, feminism

Because the workers don't actually run the businesses in those countries and their institutions are predominantly capitalist. Plus they were pretty poor as shit to begin with, and there's little you can do to make a profit when there's not much global demand for products. In Venezuela's case, the price of oil collapsing also formed a large part of their problems.

ew

You are aware that Venezuela has shitton of private companies?

Very much digging the 10th of October, 2016 edit there too lad. :^)

yes, they don't
they sign a contract before working that specifies their pay and obligations

owned by the state, just like the USSR - communist

LL&"A" Get out.

Nope, there are fully functioning privately owned companies.

that are at the mercy of the government from not having their assets seized with the police
it's probably the only entity left working in that socialist shithole, so why fix it if it ain't broken? maybe they're going the chinese route

Haha, is this my lucky day? Butthurt market fascist thread supplemented by DemCap autism inside it.

Life's good.

Great, a leftcom. Now this shitty thread is complete.

I'll always be there for you, if not physically I'll be deep in your heart.

Ah, yes, shitting on workers while making LLaA think the are socialists because muh gommie symbolism

Man seriously calm your fucking tits.

I'm not the only pirate on-board.

I have seen the flame war between you and my mate.

but seriously calm your fucking tits.

communists are retards so they'll take it
good enough for them; looks better for me than actual communism :^)

You know who LLaA is, don't you?
Especially since the posting style implies you are the person in question

marxists.org/archive/dunayevskaya/works/1941/ussr-capitalist.htm


quinterna.org/lingue/english/historical_en/maos_china_certified_copy.htm

Say, shouldn't you be adding ML and MLM to your list of 'I like them, but they don't have water filters, private academies and roads…' things you really like but don't like completely (alongside fascism)?

Even our ancaps were better a month ago :^(

oh wow this is a dank one

Real talk. This is like a special snowflake side variety of what we used to find around here. Severely disappointed.

wat?

As for why capitalism is more profitable without worker control: because a separate ownership class has no problem working people harder, driving down wages and firing redundant staff, workers tend to be somewhat reluctant to do that.

the board of directors owns the company, nobody else
the CEO and the managers are workers for the company
workers have the choice to buy company stocks with the money they earn in order to run it

USSR:
This is clearly anarcho-Marxian socialism at the very least, if not just the super communism it really is!

yeah nah

Yeah, Microsoft and Wells Fargo aren't capitalism, that's corporatism!

no, it's still capitalism, but with government intervention, because they can afford hiring tax attorneys that allows them to pay 0% tax

The system of capitalist accumulation ensures that for every dollar the workers earn, their exploitative owners earn many, many more. This ideological fantasy you describe of workers saving up and buying seats on the board is absurd, as no matter how much they save up, they will be unable to outbid those who already own it.

In addition, under the capitalist system, wages will naturally fall towards the costs of subsistence as more workers compete for the same limited quantity of jobs due to contraction of markets related to falling profitability. As we approach this scenario, workers become unable to purchase even anything beyond their base necessities, entirely precluding your scenario.

No shit. How the fuck does any of that refute what I said?

Fucking statist. I bet you drive your market purchased automobile on state-build roads instead.

the second part of your argument is much more simpler
workers are there to work, not to run the company; they're inefficient, uninformed and pussies

the classical capitalist model is laissez-faire, which is not the case in the west
it's a shitty model today, but it's still better than yours

But the empirical evidence says that workers are actually better at running firms than private owners.

Yeah, I wish we still had real laissez-faire, not this neoliberal laissez-faire with the state nationalizing key natural resources. Neoliberalism is really just socialism when you think about. Where are the hoovervilles, bread lines and child labor? This is corporatism, not real capitalism.

You didn't address my argument at all. You just responded with a complete non-sequitur.


To bad it's almost impossible for them to get access to funding and they tend to decay into standard joint stock corporations.

You want a pat on the back or something?

no step on snek boy

wew lad

Don't insult her, you fucking statist.

I dunno man, I think the playwright brought up some very real concerns. I mean I do think that if women are liberated from their traditional gender roles we may very well see a state of affairs where before any of us are allowed to have sex with our chosen partners we'd have to first bang every ugly chick in town. That's exactly the sort of thing a woman would set up, and why I personally think that feminism will never work even though it's good in theory.

she was a NEET and believed in ((free trade))
she's a literal kike
fuck off schlomo

robertlstephens.com/essays/shafarevich/001SocialistPhenomenon.html

i wonder who could be behind the edits of the page, the sourcing beisde bibliography sub-par


the interpretation with of the plot is riddled with dogwhistling

I know right? It all looks great but it just doesn't stand up to realities of human nature.

My god if women were allowed the vote the productivity loses caused by so much state mandated fucking would surly lead to economic collapse

Ayn Rand was a proud entrepreneur who sold her very valuable pro-capitalist products of hard job creator work (like Atlas Shrugged and Fountainhead) on the free market. Don't tread on her.

Glad we could sort that out for good, then. Here's to 100 years more of Democratic Brocialism!

hmmmmm

Hmm.

all of them are pro free trade
the only acceptable libertarianism is a protectionist, nationalist one, which is something specific to paleocons like Pat Buchanan and Ron Paul

Really makes you think.

ronpaul.com/on-the-issues/free-trade/

Ron Paul is a proponent of free trade and rejects protectionism, advocating “conducting open trade, travel, communication, and diplomacy with other nations.”

...

he wants to audit the fed which is why I still like him

All hail the the wisdom of the free market for its inscrutable ways are virtue manifest! The poor and tiered wage slave simply does understand
the sublime reality of the invisible hand

…unless capital and industry are flooding to china… then fuck it.

>I agree with Ron Paul, he's the real special sno proud paleoconservative who fits my ideological narratives
Really makes you think.

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

there are other issues in the ideology besides trade; securing the border, censorship, not cucking out to SJW, no homo propaganda
Pat Buchanan is closer to my ideas than him

it's the pre-civil rights cuckoldry GOP

thephilosophicalsalon.com/a-reply-to-my-critics/

ronpaul.com/on-the-issues/border-security/

Illegal immigrants are a convenient scapegoat for our economic crisis. But with free markets and private property, the need for immigrant labor becomes obvious. Most immigrants, regardless of the color of their skin, are open to the ideals of liberty: private property, free markets, sound money, right to life, low taxes, less war, protection of civil liberties, and a foreign policy designed for peace.

ronpaul.com/2015-06-26/ron-paul-it-shouldnt-be-up-to-the-state-to-define-marriage/

Let the individual, let two people define marriage. This will annoy some people but it will also get rid of this whole debate. We wouldn’t be arguing about the definition of marriage. I can have my definition, somebody else can have theirs.

So yeah, he had a big buzz with federal reserve auditing but he's really on your side.

The guy who basically adopted a conservative pro-LGBT position all of a sudden after Islamic fundamentalists targeted them recently to win their support over?

BTW please bring up Jared Taylor next. I can sense it, so please confirm.

I too like to live accelerationistly

You realize how different things would be if the goods consumed here were produced here? It wouldn't look like what you're furiously masturbating over, i can assure you of that.

Kys

I see nothing wrong with this

But enamor the right tp the free movement of peoples.
- t. ron bol
But encourage immigration on the basis of saving the national economy and the job market's equilibrium.
- t. ron bol
But allow them to enter legally instead.
- t. ron bol
But enact every very paleoconservative!(tm) policy stated above through state authority means by senate vote or presidential power.
- t. ron bol

This is the essence of paleoconservative libertarian minarchism!

Also bring up Jared Taylor now pls.

Buchanan alternatively.