Examples of successful right-wing riots/revolutions?

I've been following some debates in left-wing circles on Twitter and elsewhere about the use of violence against those they deem racist, anti-Semitic, etc. The "moderate" liberals generally say that violence is something that should be avoided, while the more radical ones (Marxists, anarchists) say that such violence can be justified and has led to many major left-wing accomplishments.

Although your average "moderate" liberal won't like to admit it, there were many left-wing movements in the 20th century that used violence to accomplish their goals. Examples includes a number of labor riots, suffragette riots, civil rights riots and the Stonewall riots. The Civil Rights movements in particular has been so sanitized of any bad elements, that most people now believe that is was "peaceful protests," and not the threat of an insurrection by armed black militants, that caused the government to pass the Civil Rights Act of 1964 into law. In the video I posted, you can hear Black Panther(?) activists singing "off the pigs!", yet this is something few people think of whenever the Civil Rights movement is talked about.

This brings me to my next point. The radical left can easily think of a number of successful left-wing riots and movements, whereas cuckservatives are quick to cower in fear and shriek about how much they abhor violence. This is why I think it's important to have a discussion about right-wing riots and revolutions that were successful and had lasting effects, and for what reasons.

This ranges from pro-white race riots, such as the Red Summer, to anti-LGBT riots, and even anti-communist revolutions in Eastern Europe. Some other examples that come to mind are the Spanish Civil War, the Romanian Revolution, the ethnic cleansing of Bosnian and Albanian Muslims by Serbian Christians. the Cronulla riots (pic related), and some recent riots in various parts of Europe against the construction of asylum-seeker centers and the asylum seekers/refugees themselves.

Now that things are heating up in parts of Europe and the US, we could probably learn a thing or two that we could put to good use in the near future.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=Jh20FjAYiXs
infogalactic.com/
voltairenet.org/IMG/pdf/Sutton_Wall_Street_and_the_bolshevik_revolution-5.pdf
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulsa_race_riot
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oklahoma_City_bombing
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Oh, and here's a video from a communist youtube channel in which some guy talks about some of the things I mentioned in the second paragraph.

Right wing revolutions are always reactionary because conservatives usually try to mediate or do it by the book. They just want to be left alone. Up until they snap.

Leftist revolutions are violent becouse leftist are usually very zealous with their ideology and can't take a no or try to negotiate. Their leaders also are often sociopaths. And that's why they don't gather the support of the general public. They succeeded only a couple of times and always after a devastating war.
The other way is the long march through the institutions through indoctrination. Which is pretty obvious and it eventually devolves into violence.

And revolutions are done by the political extremes. Right wing extremes honestly aren't that numerous or organized until things really shit the fan. Hence reactionary.
Leftist's goals are by default global communism through democracy.

...

How successful was the White Russian Army in their fight against the Bolsheviks?

Excessively.

As in, the Bolsheviks took five YEARS fighting them, with 5 million dead.

The only one that matters
youtube.com/watch?v=Jh20FjAYiXs

We don't riot. We form militias and generally impose strict moral and cultural norms when we chimp out. Most successful one I know of was led by Pinochet in Chile, but I disagree with giving the other side martyrs just as a general rule

I wish I could say I'm surprised.
p.s. socialism isn't right wing. It's only to the right when you compare it to the other dominant political force in Germany at that time- communism

spanish civil war

Pinochet was backed by the CIA though, so I'm not sure that's necessarily the best example.

Look up the accomplishments of Robespierre in France. He was responsible for the French Revolution, brought "terror" to the people of France, and paved the way for the rise of Napoleon. He was unfortunately executed by guillotine before he could see his God Emperor.

In the theme of France, a great example of Jewry happened around 100 years later. Learn about the "Dreyfus Affair". Tldr, a French commander/jew in the military was charged with treason for giving military secrets to Russia. The military, catholic church, and "anti semites" were united against him. The jew countersued the military for falsifying evidence against him because "they're just evil anti semites don't read into it" and the rat was found innocent.
France became divided because over the results as conservatives and liberals bitched much like they do today. Remember the Ferguson riots? Imagine that on a national level.

No matter where you look in history you'll find the same old song and dance OP. Authoritarian rule becomes popular, then 95% of the time some kikes come along and seed liberal revolutions, until the right gets pissed off and takes it back again. Liberals almost never exist without the presence of the Jew.

T. Historian

What about Azov?

We never learn much in history class about what exactly happened in Russia. It's just WW1 happens, people get pissed off, bolsheviks grow in power, eventually take over in a violent revolution, USSR.

How did the bolsheviks win against the white russians? I mean, the bolsheviks were almost all jews, and jews and ethnic russian hated each other. I find it surprising that they were able to actually take over.

Or is it because all the good strong men were out fighting/dying in WW1, allowing the bolsheviks to take power with less resistance from russians?

William Dudley Pelley fought alongside them and he got redpilled on the Jews and came back to America forming our very first fascist movement, the Silver Legion of America. This in turn inspired the fascist movements of GLR and others which ultimately led to the creation of Holla Forums.

In a way the White Russians may be the most successful anti communists in history.

Believe it or not, but a huge pool of manpower for th Bolsheviks was the Chinese Labour Corps that ended up stuck in Russia during the revolution

Didn't they cut off his head or murder him in a bathtub or something?

Stop covering for the Jews, Alex

We are not alled to talk about the ukraine because it will derail and have the same thread with the same replies we have had for years.

Well there is the March of Rome, when Italian blackshirts overthrew the Italian government and Mussolini became the new leader (his mistake was not purging the cabinet Night of Long Knives style). There is the Spanish Civil War (Franco basically united the carlists, the conservatives, the traditionalists and the fascists under the falange), the beer hall Putsch (was executed poorly, would have been interesting if Hitler had succeeded back then). The whites in russia are another example. All this revolutions happened in times of political and economic crisis

Lemme guess, the original had a white man as the world's worst enemy

He's not wrong, but it's not the whole truth either.
Kikes are the literal satanists who are the enemy. All three of them are the same thing.

Satan is real, the Jews worship him. The black cube, saturn, time.

Most of the successful leftist revolutions were backed by someone.It's honestly pretty common for revolutionary movements to have foreign backing.
The civil rights movement was funded by the USSR and Mao.

Walburgs and Rothschilds funneled approx 2 billion in gold to the bolsheviks so they could fund their army.
Russia was basically shattered at the end of WW1 and people needed to eat.
And the communists fed them.
20 000 yews were infiltrated over the collapsing front to act as commanders . You hear only of Lenin and Trotsky, but in reality, a lot of immigrant russian jews from the Pale invaded with sleeper cells and took over. Similar to how they funneled ISIS into Europe.
Communism was basically the retribution for the Pogroms.

Video related.


This. All lefty revolutions are funded by the infected countries. Hillary was funded by China. And whole commiefornia is basically their colony. Hollywood is getting completely bought up by Chinks.

You're thinking of two separate people.

Robespierre was head of the "security council" (it was called something roughly along those lines) that was in charge of executing counter-revolutionaries. He was then later found guilty by that same council and he was executed. guillotined, just like he did to thousands of people.

The guy who died in the bath-tub was Marat.
Marat was a radical leftist in the French revolution who was a major public supporter of the 'sans-culottes', the poor underclass mob militia of Paris who were a sort of pre-marxist communist gang who enforced the rule of the revolutionary government. He was killed in his bathtub, painting related.

NONE, EVER. What WORKS, is getting involved in local politics. Muh race war shit is NEVER GOING TO HAPPEN. Go tell a normie the White race is disappearing, they'll ask you were it's going? They want fucking healthcare. You don't say, fuck all these niggers. You SCARE them then. You link ALL problems with mass and illegal immigrant and they know what you're on about and will vote for you if you have solutions. Violent shit is laughable today. What're you, White trash BLM?

All this shit you're referencing failed, REPEATEDLY and for HALF A CENTURY. Yet everyday, we have dumb assholes pushing more of it. Like a holohoax infographic is going to win us back a city.

Bugger off Joe, yeh wanker! Healthcare is a mess and bureaucratic politics are gay as it gets full of self important pompous fools with no power.

Yeah, reactionary and fascist groups have never ever triumphed over leftists, normies are inherently leftist and not easily led sheep, and the March of Progress is real. We should just wait for ZOG to consoli- uh, I mean, collapse.

Yea, like Nelson Mandela, who blew women and children up, among other things like kidnapping and torturing children, and executing people by putting burning tires around their necks. Thats how apartheid was ended.

You have to till the soil you wish to politic in. The more noise we make for the cause, the more we prepare the soil for planting.

Didn't mean to post image.

So they didn't die in vain? Those glorious bastards fought the good fight against crushing odds; that makes me really happy user, thanks for the new perspective.

Therein lies the real issue.
The majority are easily led sheeple.

Look at the fascists. Their ultimate goal was human advancement and development.
They wanted every human to be all that they could be and the results were quite incredible.
But end of the day, the majority will never amount to much.

The commies had little issue getting around this with Lenin and his revolutionary vanguard concept.
They absorb any groups with a slight left wing stance and then execute them when they take power.
It works rather well.

We have no real equivalent in terms of strategy.
We rely on shit getting awful forcing people to accept us out of a desire for survival.

They're not successful yet; unless they're playing some 88d chess (it doesn't look like it), they're basically little more than kike attack dogs screaming "fuck yoo ruskieeeeee reeee" while the jews rape their country. It's sad really; you want to like them, but it's hard when they're so obviously the goodest of goys at the moment.

Also this, note how my reply echoes the very first greentext:

It is weird though.
Every time Ukraine comes up we get the sudden deluge of shitposting

I have no doubt that low-paid RIDF regularly duels state department or whoever with the shittiest of low quality trash posting in a vain attempt to shape our opinions on what is a stupid clusterfuck of state department schenanigans and russian espionage.

It's weird though: the standard state department (or whoever) tactic when they battle the ridf is to first start with "putin is the savior of the white race" and then samefag discrediting the "theory" when no one fucking believes this. If you're going to strawman, at least do it on something someone actually believes, christ. Then Ivan comes in with his terrible grasp of english and out come the burger memes.

This is our future: internet shitposting between two shadow governments.

We all know that Russia taking the Crimea was inevitable and use of the Crimean naval bases was what the USA was after.
Why does anyone still care?

Jacob.
Fucking.
Schiff.

...

...

Hohol spotted.

Too late, we now know you are shabbos nationalist.

Bait.

infogalactic.com/ info/Battle_of_Athens_(1946)

I think you have it right user.

Facists are pretty much fanatics, and out of this fanaticism comes human advancement and development. The majority just don't have the will or fanaticism to amount to anything great.
GLR has is right that anyone who is not a fanatic is simply forgotten.

In terms of examples USA founding fathers, I can't think of many other examples that worked out well in the long run.

How did the bolsheviks win against the white russians? I mean, the bolsheviks were almost all jews, and jews and ethnic russian hated each other. I find it surprising that they were able to actually take over.

It wasn't an overnight success. Most people don't know that there was a civil war that lasted nearly 4 years in Russia after the bolsheviks killed the Romanov family and assumed the role of governance.

The white army fought them from 1917-1921 all across russia until they ran out of money, food, supplies and ultimately, their spirit.

Wall Street funded the bolsheviks.

voltairenet.org/IMG/pdf/Sutton_Wall_Street_and_the_bolshevik_revolution-5.pdf

Also, no one ever really takes into account that russia, because of its people, have never been technologically proficient. Ever.

As the west was reaping the benefits from the industrial revolution throughout the 19th and early 20th centuries, russia was at least 75 years behind the curve. It was like trying to teach calculus to a classroom of niggers.

This built a lot of jealousy and resentment in the Russian people, so it was extremely easy for them to be hoodwinked by a few jews and their ideas of 'free shit forever'. Especially after getting BTFO in WW1 as quickly as they did.

I'm well aware of this.

There's a reason for that; while there rest of europe was done with feudalism, russia was very much still mired in the most retarded form of it. There's an image floating around using Russian serfs as an example as to why nignogs and their 200 years of slavery have fucking nothing on russian serfs who then went on to form a crude semblance of civilization in the cold north east; slav == slave is very apt indeed.

also the vast majority of russians were slaves until 20 years after burger abolition only to be almost immediately followed up by jews fucking them for nearly a century so cut them some slack

It's not weird. You have a fake national socialist group that are Strasserist tier lead by a liberal jew being given money from Soros. They are not the good guys

Basically every socialist African/Middle Eastern country.

pick one faggot

Nigga, the French revolution might as well have been a dress rehearsal for the Russian one. The only exception is that in France, the moderate leftists in the military prevailed eventually. The revolutionary terror was essentially the same shit as commie attrocities everywhere, caused by the same factors - revolution happens, promises great things, fails to deliver, seeks someone to blame.

Equality is a lie but admitting it would invalidate the revolution, so instead they always start chasing """subversives""", """dissidents""" and """traitors""". Then the pressure of external invasions very quickly pushes them back into a hierarchical society, just one that carries with it the pretense of liberty, equality and fraternity and what not. Both the early revolutionary french and the russians thought democratic bands of free warriors will prevail over "slave soldiers of the old oppressors", and both quickly reinstated the former military after crushing early defeats.

Depends on what you mean by right.

The traditionalist movement, the natsoc movement etc. didn't need violence.

Forces of nature can't be stopped.
Die flut kommt.

etc.

kek meant 3rd Reich

Jungian slip m8
When you accidentally subconsciously predict the future

It also triggers me that you say Pinochet was also redpilled and such when as another anons said he was paid by the CIA and was prozionism.
the rest I dont know much about them

I'm sorry, do you need evidence of supposedly "good" Nazi groups that have ties to banks? Because Ukraine is hardly the only one (at least in EU) who has Nazi movements funded by international Capital (banks).

In my opinion, that standard behaviour, but people want "prooofs".

Read a book, FFS. It's Communists (Marx, and then Lenin/Stalin) who trace their ideas to Robespierre.

There was no "right wing revolutions" ever in history, because the world always was right wing.
We live in an unprecedented time where "left wing" is a thing.

Yo. There are no right-wing revolutions because it would be counter-revolution, if it succeeded. Right is about protecting status quo. Left (real Left, not bullshit Liberal "Left") is about rational creation of a better society.

(checked)
In Germany's case there were plenty of street fights during the 20s. See vid related at 5:12.
Commies were being commies as usual and national socialists weren't going to take it up the ass. They created the SA for a reason.


Wat.
Communists killed him, but Franco later did turn the fascist party into a jew-approved right wing authoritarian party. If you find any other faggot who thinks Franco was based just link them to Hitler's testament.

the civil war was over, for having ostracized the Phalangists, whom Spain has to thank for such aid as we gave her, and for having treated like bandits former foes, who were very far from all being Reds. To put half a country beyond the pale of the law while a minority of pillagers enrich themselves, with the blessing of the priesthood, at the expense of the rest is
no solution at all. I am quite sure that very few of the so-called Reds in Spain w^ere really Communists. We were badly deceived, for, had I known the real state of affairs, I would never have allowed our aircraft to bombard and destroy a starving population and at the
same time re-establish the Spanish clergy in all their horrible privileges.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulsa_race_riot
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oklahoma_City_bombing

Tulsa race riot you fucking faggot

OP literally listed a bunch of riots and revolutions that worked

It was a long and bloody civil war between the October Revolution of 1917 and 1922. The Whites fought the Reds and were aided by an intenrational coalition, but they got pushed into Siberia and finally they lost.

Jewish pawn used to test Friedman economics.


Why do you say he was Jewish?

you have no idea what youre talking about do you?

socialism is an economic and an infrastructural system.
not to mention that alot of countries that attempted to practice it rellied on nationalism to boost popular support and dynamics, like germany, USSR during and after WW2, north korea, yugoslavia, etc

it was a reactionary action rather than a revolution, as a response to a shitfest that the goverment in madrid had

...

The OCB accomplished nothing. Don't even bring that up.

if the goal was just to get ukraine out of the russian sphere of influence as the US planned then yes.
on an economic, social, diplomatic level it was just sad.

because two entire nations of posters on here are on damage control.

i tought it was done by the fedgovt. and blamed on just one of the operatives.
there was an entire documentary on youtube that told how the guy who was blamed for it got recruited by some federal branch armed forces unit after being supposedly discharged etc, while the bombing was a pretext for new federal security policies.

the video was deleted ofcourse, i cant find it right now anywhere

Mussolini's Italy and the March on Rome are probably the best example.

Riots are degenerate and serve no purpose. When the right finally has enough there will be no try. You won't have people trashing stores and knocking over garbage cans. You won't have people beating innocents in the streets and throwing explosives at grandmothers.

The right has a vision that is rooted in truth, science, and justice. There won't be any need for circle-jerks. Whereas antifa have nothing. The total sum of their movement equates to gib monies. When they "riot" or "revolt", people retaliate because they see innocent people in harms way.

As long as you remain ethical and focused you will have the people at your side. It's just a matter of time.