There's talk of breaking up Google

dailycaller.com/2017/04/20/google-urges-developers-to-use-gender-neutral-language/

www.theverge.com/2017/4/19/15349284/alphabet-verily-google-x-project-baseline-medical-data

These companies work in open collusion with Government (all over the World, not just the USA). I really see no incentive from the perspective of policy makers to break them up.

Modern tech firms are weapons in the hands of Governments, the ultimate propaganda, surveillance, blackmail, control devices and the best part is they do all the legwork, no need for the Government to put the work to build or maintain these tools. All they need do is allow them to run as monopolies and not punish them for their creative tax accounting and in return they allow use of their arsenal.

The only thing that would cause Government to break them up would be if they went rogue and stopped complying, and in that case they would simply be replaced by people willing to play ball. I don’t see a way out of this. Welcome to hell.

why are they anti-white? why are they run by jews?

It'll be fun watching all the leftists defend corporations if Trump dislikes them. If Trump really does this he'll end up being like my favorite president Teddy Roosevelt.

Something I learned yesterday that's relevant to the thread: google is filtering fakemailgenerator.com out of it's search results.

We need another Teddy, that man was amazing. I wish we could just have another Roosevelt and another Jackson.

Jews work under a different set of ethics than other peoples; this is consistent throughout their history. In times of antiquity the Jews looked upon nations free of debt slavery and saw not prosperity and fairness but opportunity and enacted usury for example. The Jews saw opportunity in new technologies not to spread the advantages of them and improve the world but rather to gain control and unfairly ensure profit/ power.
They are anti-white because Jews openly prefer to live in nations free of societal cohesion, they feel safer that way.

Everyone knows this. These tech companies are no different than Standard Oil or the other big evil corporations of the industrial days. The only thing they do differently is completely control the media. It's insane, not even the most liberal rags will go after these companies.

^

pic extremely related

They aren't run by the deep state. They got invited in to the club and are the deep state.

You do understand why they're targeting Google though right? It's not to our benefit. The dying old media sees the threat posed by new media like Youtube, this is the next step in their Pewdiepie bullshit that led to the advertiser boycott. They are actively trying to suffocate opposition voices and regain control of the narrative.

Don't get me wrong, Google is evil in its own right. But in this case it serves our interests to support them over these old media cretins. Until there's a viable alternative to Youtube we need to ensure the old media does not regain control.

I wonder if when they do that, they'll finally realise that while actually believing they're fighting capitalism, they're actually nothing but useful idiots for the (((globalists))).

But probably giving them too much credit.

That book made me so angry. Fucking bluepills.

Breaking Google up into what exactly? Google already setup a Holdings Company (Alphabet) to manage their assets. There is jack shit regulators would be able to do with our current draft of Anti Trust law

Honestly, holdings companies need to just be outlawed altogether

A bit late for that. Anyone got the chart? Captured regulation isn't a meme, it's the truth. Just like congress is captured by (((certain treacherous foreign special interests))).

You're right but we should be creating solid unpozzed alternatives ourselves instead as well. Already have boys boots on the ground but getting into fights with gommies isn't going to fix anything, not completely anyway. MSM shattered their reputation into a gorillion pieces, they aren't trustworthy. Someone has to be the new media and if kids like PDP are the way to do it than so be it but we should just go all the way and of course not being jewy in our practices unlike them. The Nazis were right.

Or, you know, you could just make copyrights, patents and the like expire after 15 years or so (not the infinity years model we have now). Maybe then someone could open source Google's search algorithm and work to provide a better service.

kek'd at this

What kind of fucking retard wrote this?

Microsoft are still a monopoly and I don't see how Exxon Mobil, Citigroup or Shell Oil are 'tech' companies. They're two oil companies and a bank.

Patent reform would be much better, at the moment all the patent system is doing is making the cost of business so high that only a handful of large companies can exist in certain markets. Modern patents are so vague you can't build anything with the information in the patent. If you invent anything patents no longer protect you, lawsuits to enforce them are too costly and large companies will retaliate with lawsuits over vague patents just to drive up legal costs.

If you invented a cold fusion reactor today and got a patent you would likely have to sell it to lawyers or a large corporation for a fraction of it's value.

Patent and Copyright laws are possibly worse than the banking system. For some reason suggesting reductions to patent or copyright powers to normies triggers them. Then again the UN pushes copyright as a human rights issue. I am uncertain if the systems are possible to salvage. For the moment they are really nothing more than a global tax that gets paid to patent lawyers for arguing about imaginary property.

One interesting fact is America was unable to produce aircraft for WW1. Why? Patent fights had destroyed the US aircraft industry to the point no one could build them without being sued. I doubt America would have won ww2 or the cold war if they had to deal with modern patent law.

...

What's the book about?

It is. Remember that nearly every state in the world is run by a leftist vanguard party on behalf of an oligarchy

The Current Years has to go. Collapse NAO.

Yes, let's break it up goyim.
See Google is five different firms now? Clearly they no longer have control over you since they are five different independent firms. (hehehe).

In this case it is best to hang Google out to dry and use the hole the establishment will make for us to establish and promote viable alternatives.

If Jewgle is planning on splitting off some divisions, the only reason would be that the kikes are going to make some shekels from the deal. Probably by screwing a whole lot of goy over in the process (see: 2008 'financial crisis').

DOX

IMKAMPHY

KILL

KILL

THE TRAITOR!

DOX IMKAMPHY

SAVE Holla Forums!&

We must boost this! Jewgle has to be destroyed.

how about we just abolish all patents for 10 years and see what happens.

Yep. Add this to the ad boycott over videos that aren't jewish enough and it seems clear their plan. They will threaten to break up Google unless it censors all anti-jew anti-globalist media from its search engine and youtube.
There it is. We have to break up Google and Facebook because the fake news on social media put Trump in the white house and next time it could be a real national socialist.

What viable alternatives? Are you going to set up a massive server farm and video streaming infrastructure yourself? We literally do not have the resources to replace what google has. We are better served by hijacking it and maintaining control over it until we do have those resources. Right now we have literally no means of replacing Youtube, and all the alternatives do not have anywhere near the brand recognition or infrastructure we need.

Of the six(6) Google executives, four(4) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 67%. Of the ten(10) Google directors, four(4) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 40%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the Google executives by a factor of 33.5 times(3,350 percent) and over-represented among the Google directors by a factor of 20 times(2,000 percent).

Of the eleven(11) Amazon.com executives, eight(8) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 73%. Of the nine(9) Amazon.com directors, six(6) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 67%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the Amazon.com executives by a factor of 36.5 times(3,650 percent) and over-represented among the Amazon.com directors by a factor of 33.5 times(3,350 percent).

Of the three(3) Facebook executives, three(3) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 100%. Of the seven(7) Facebook directors, four(4) are Jews or partial Jews. This is a numerical representation of 57%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews are over-represented among the Facebook executives by a factor of 50 times(5,000 percent) and over-represented among the Facebook directors by a factor of 28.5 times(2,850 percent).

(((Their))) goals aren't even hidden

Long-term hypothetical:
I don't see how this is anything other than Jews continuing to be self-destructive retards. If they want to get rid of - of all kiked up companies - Google, under the pipe dream of shutting a few select YouTubers up, fine.

Side-note: Google is already acting EXTREMELY illegally when it comes to getting navigation information for indoor venues. A rather specific unpozzed company is trying to make navigation maps to compete with them, and eventually move to indoor information directories. Normally, they have to ask permission to map, say, a local mall, but fucking JEWGLE just scrubs the mall's website and takes the data anyway. Main difference is that Google wants to know who you are, where you're going, why you're there, and what you're doing, when everybody else is trying to de-personalize the data and just say "ok, 1000 individuals with phones visited this place last weekend."

Google needs to die harder than most companies around them, as far as I'm concerned.