Holla Forums reading thread

This is who you trust? Hmm…

No, I'm saying because they thought it was shit this seems good. It wasn't sarcasm

Well then, checked mother fucker.

Forgot: The Art of War.

dumping before imkikey delets this

fug books :DDD

...

/thread

I highly recommend Meditations by Marcus Aurelius. Develop your virtues.

Started reading it, will finish after I finish Metro 2033 cheeki breeki

1984
Brave New World
Thus Spoke Zarathustra
Essays by Schopenhauer
Fate of Empries
Mein Kampf
Art of The Deal
Art of War
48 Laws of Power
I'd definitely recommend the last 3, for sure.

...

...

What does Holla Forums think of Will Durant? Specifically his Story of our Civilization series?

What is Holla Forumss opinion on her? I have been recommended Atlas Shrugged many times but that book is pro free market capitalism isn't it? Or is it still worth the read? In my que I have: finish Metro 2033, Meditations, March of The Titans, How Hitler Could Have Won The War, and then I want to start reading some stuff to prepare me for Nietzsche. I have the stalag edition of Mein Kampf but I wanted to be better read before I read it, though I might just read it first and once my German is good enough and I am better read read it in original text.

"Ayn Rand" was a pen name. The author's real name was (((Alicia Rosenbaum))).

Need anything else?

suggesting larping rockwell
please dont

Dumping mega links.
mega:#F!B4dB2SzQ!h_pMC30v2a_y31iD0dy0sg
Mega folder for the monthly Holla Forums books.
mega.co.nz/#F!fo0TDC4a!Ck2n3wuqWutm3FyLtxZB8A
mega.co.nz/#F!4FJSUTyL!gRWJW5eBK0ydunfSzDB3xg
mega.co.nz/#F!scMFjYZY!MKTKFWGVVuA7kV4OMHgkcg
mega.co.nz/#F!UdxSVLJB!bgBwqzuFIV3z0HvCswA0dQ
mega.co.nz/#F!AE5yjIqB!y7Vdxdb5pbNsi2O3zyq9KQ!cE5yWZoI
mega.co.nz/#F!sU90kbAR!pXKWaWnZcY8eTIA2wUSDBA
mega.co.nz/#F!LotEVRxT!YE-YrG6SZ54nJqltrYN8Nw
mega.co.nz/#F!6kJzEIJb!aVVgmWAM-aP_bU_8Co43FA
mega.co.nz/#F!K8wTjbiZ!mWFZsQRr2SZYC1AsoE6Shw
mega.co.nz/#F!m00SjRRA!R_I9wzUTEhSN6spP35TyZg
mega.co.nz/#F!zQtglTAY!JZ8y7bZpqPz6od5WmtLfIg
mega.co.nz/#F!MQ8ziQKK!rzb0LRaZoyL6te1tguBNnA!RBs1mRhC
mega.co.nz/#F!9RAkwRwR!4oXYTi7YoIEXVK_gSPBY0Q
mega.co.nz/#F!eMs1HDRD!LJcwVTJXhhx1a5bUu2l0dg
mega.co.nz/#F!6sgETKCa!vGFF5iTfCR6lH3ZLXaQorQ
mega.co.nz/#F!0F5GXTjS!oGdz8UP5JbcleNMy6YKLvg
mega.co.nz/#F!cZoSEbpC!kdnYuLw3hvYSus9uZl6PRQ
mega.co.nz/#F!4MJE0L6Q!teKAfBlT2m3Ija-Tun-EFw
mega.co.nz/#F!pYRnSJaC!HrC3Siqyioo9PjdGMNWs3Q
thepiratebay.se/torrent/10561225/_pol_itical_literature__t_orrent
kat.cr/5-000-literature-files-science-philosophy-history-politics-religion-t10661863.html
Germanic paganism dump:
mega.nz/#F!bENznApJ!zoLo1-76Rpraq_5ztpZ3SA

If you haven't read a significant chunk of the western canon, please do yourself a favor and get started on that. If you want a big list, St John's College has one that's solid. More specifically right-wing works are important, but they should come later (there are a few exceptions to this–you should definitely read Filmer's Patriarcha alongside Locke when you get to that point, for instance). Any decent author in philosophy, political theory, or history is going to be drawing on a whole bunch of stuff that has come before him and you will get more out of it if you've read some of that.

If you have not read any Plato, please do not start with the Republic. Euthyphro, Apology, Crito, Phaedo, in that order, then branch out into some of the other relatively easy dialogues like Symposium or Theaetetus before you tackle the Republic. The Republic is important but if you go into it not knowing what Plato's writing is like you're going to miss a lot.
It's also completely insane that 9/10 of that top ten is from the twentieth century. Don't do shit like that.

Atlas Shrugged is bad, The Fountainhead is okay, We The Living is pretty good. None of her work is essential unless you're trying to argue with Objectivists, you will not miss much by skipping her.

Here's a final dump of mega links.
Nazi Germany film collection
mega.nz/#F!xM80wSrL!4HGX_dOmHPhjL3lX3bsHdw
USMC books
mega.nz/#F!JFFUQZLL!2bKOt-rwNfxXT9-Xyojjiw
Goodies for /tok/ which includes books by C.G. Jung, Ernst Junger, Kek stuff, Egyptian Mythology books, etc.
mega.nz/#!9JMxzQjA!OFpTHk2Z7RLpYUeGPvw2PFPJFXGu36PikfhLTKAqdGo
cointelpro
mega.nz/#!hA1nwQbb!hn5NAlVkusAS6OBK7d2OgUd6EQoHijwZzEVkZbDSTEs
a history of chans
mega.nz/#!YQNFAQSa!sY8DPrmJLDww4ObxpmRmiPBrs_ssE0PRWCT9xI71AxA
mega redpill thread
mega.nz/#!lMt22STa!blRR66j2yJGaUAz0dhGaDFnnSWb4XfUu5CKLLb6bkEA
spoopi military, which included books from the JSOC user
mega.nz/#!hQFUzI4C!4ZIwWWpUH4h0VO3QacAexgHdGs1i2_CvkoxaN5WX0ds
memory hole thread
mega.nz/#!FBFSARTS!zw8TJDqYOaHVJcWFGPMdg3cjWXVmJjYqgq-Wvn0Prak
BEAVER user POSTS
mega.nz/#!oY8XGZyR!rhwe1F1eELjzBzZiMotddaYIp_8lGl7AWlyCZ_ufGoc

I always thought she looked like an adult Anne Frank, guess I know why

Won't bother with it than, thanks user. Have a rare Hitler

It's not that bad, most of the shilling against it has been from basic bitch liberals, but obviously it's kind of jewey and nihilistic

Thanks for these, a lot to go through.

Mandatory reading for anyone on Holla Forums
Gottfried Feder, Manifesto for the Abolition of Enslavement to Interest on Money

Have it read to you in vid related.

Anchor in 3-2-1… (sadly)

Do you want to know how I know you're not from here?

Fuck off imkikey, books and self improvement help everyone here

...

Have a summary of some of the Holla Forums essential readings.

Download links with different fonts:

Version with pictures:

Font1: pdf-archive.com/2017/01/22/the-money-lenders-and-their-game-by-anonymous-font1/

Font2: pdf-archive.com/2017/01/22/the-money-lenders-and-their-game-by-anonymous-font2/

Font3: pdf-archive.com/2017/01/22/the-money-lenders-and-their-game-by-anonymous-font3/

Version without pictures:

Font1: pdf-archive.com/2017/01/22/the-money-lenders-and-their-game-by-anonymous-nopics-font1-1/

Font2: pdf-archive.com/2017/01/22/the-money-lenders-and-their-game-by-anonymous-nopics-font2/

Font3: pdf-archive.com/2017/01/22/the-money-lenders-and-their-game-by-anonymous-nopics-font3/

Epub, Txt-file and HTML-file can be found in:

archive.org/details/TheMoneyLendersAndTheirGameByAnonymousNopics

If the jews declared war on germany for their parting away with international jewery why didnt they seek war with Italy much earlier?

Because Italy was weak and unimportant, no real threat to the Jews nor the Anglo-American establishment. Only when Germany started to become strong again they started to get Mussolini as an ally against Germany at a time where basically everyone except Switzerland and Denmark/Scandinavia had an anti-German stance.

Italy was simply too weak to become a threat to them where as Germany surpassed the GDP of the French empire and British empire combined under Hitler (similar to pre WW1), especially considering they did this with barter trade for international trade, basically "stealing" markets from the capitalist countries, completely bypassing international banks.

But what the Allies or the Jews have to fear from Italy? Basically nothing of worth.

Julius Evola

Joseph Conrad and Herman Melville are my favourite authors and you should read them

Not gonna lie, user. Moby Dick bored me to tears and I still haven't finished it.

Learn your own mind

read it until you like it, I won't accept that you didn't finish it

Ok.

Should have added something by Nietzsche tqbh. Btw. has someone uploaded Maps of meaning on /pdf/ yet?

Deleted reading threads?
Read this, here you will find all the deleted threads

F
telegra.ph/Newfag-guide-to-8chpol-compromised-mods-undeniable-proofs---part-1-04-05

I would suggest, "Brave New World" its a good way to redpill people, since you can very easily draw parralells to the real world.

One of the biggest things is the population is controlled via their pleasures, are you truely free if your future is predetermined from conception, the truth is drowned out in a sea of information so no one can tell what is true and what is not, should you give up your freedom as a human if it means peace for the entire world.

Good read, only a few hundred pages so nothing to crazy.

...

...

"Twilight Over England"

Western guy from /pol of the 1930's defects to Germany before WW2 breaks out. Writes a book detailing his understanding. Gets executed by the Allies after WW2.

good shit

started out spooky, but i got bored quick

The Myth - Alfred Rosenberg
No idea why all these faggots with "essential reading" don't have Alfred's works in them. Jews went out of the way to have this non-military German author executed at Nuremberg.

...

Any good hand to hand combat or crowd control books in the USMC books mega?

I took a look through but i didn't see anything

That guy sounds interesting.

Read books about legal theory.

I use my local uni's book but I'm sure there are better tomes out there on the subject.
The focus should be on the relationship between natural/universal law and made made social laws.

Then I'd start reading on scientific laws - physics, chemistry, biology, mathematics.
You'll soon begin to see the pattern between those laws and the social legal laws that our society makes today.

There are also approaches to legal decision making you need to look into such as Kantianism, Virtual Ethics and Consequentialism.

It'd be great if 8/pol/ became more legally knowledgeable about the areas of Contract, Tort, Criminal and other areas of law, as well as how to make legal decisions.
Imagine a place that shitposted - but could also know the law as good as some other legal scholars.

man* made

Books are JIDF slide thread

REMEMBER TO SAGE EVERYBDOY

You are not even trying ironmarch

Is this some leftypol meme?

Its a fiction book from the 1910s(?)

I gathered as much, yes.

Myth of the 20th Century.

Author was hung at Nuremburg. His crime was writing this.

Well that's silly of them tbh, because these tend to be productive.

Zizek has some intuitive insights, but also a lot of "mental gymnastics".

I'm starting to disagree with getting rid of interest. It's a mechanism to stimulate production. Furthermore when things are produced there needs to be a way of coping with the subsequent devaluation of the product when the capital does not increase in size with the amount of produce that is in circulation.
Inflation needs to occur to expand the capital with the expansion of produce. The problem is that a lot of people are accruing interest on loans that they're not even using for productive purposes - i.e. through arbitrage and hedging.
Effectively you get a situation where interest "pools" into a stagnant pond that collects this increase in interest without being attached to any increase in production.

Interest loans need to be attach purely to projects that are guaranteed to increase produce by the interest amount (percentage increase in the companies produce compared to when they started).
We need to knuckle down on leeches that get "idle money" without actually producing anything. The longer the currency takes to actually get to where it's needed (where things are produced) the larger that "stagnant pool" gets. The currency is slowed down by unnecessary transactions.

Like what? Isn't he a postmodernist faggot?

Like his ideas on ideology.
Then he ignores the fact that his view on ideology is ideology in itself.

It's that sort of mental gymnastics which I find hilarious.

mega.nz/#F!B4dB2SzQ!h_pMC30v2a_y31iD0dy0sg

Don't feel bad, he was long winded. Ever since Ezra pound edited Hemingway we've become spoiled by books that get to the point and spend words carefully. I tried reading Melville out loud in a car ride with a friend, we took turns with it and we just couldnt. The sentences were so long and ungainly we literally ran out of breath. I did read it in my youth as a book but it was almost more challenge reading.

I find some of the most readable writers of previous centuries are comedians, like Mark Twain, whose novels play well today even if they are eccentric. Also, Jack London wrote a stirring adventure novel from the pov of a dog in 1900, it too would fit well on a bookshelf in a modern store. I guess brevity is the soul of wit and rural people don't mince words and so on. The rest of literary canon will be coming from rich and idle folk on the whole, which lead I think to a sort of stylistic pissing contest kind of like old dress styles lent themselves to almost unwearable clothing.

Still some really good old stuff out there, as other posts have pointed out. A french quadroon named Dumas wrote a series called the three musketeers that I loved. Also when it comes to the matter of philosophical works, I agree with the Plato poster, ha e a plan, seek advice on order of sequence, and read primers/ wikis beforehand, then use commentaries during the read. Those works give big ideas that are not easily understood or criticized, but when you put them all together you've got bigger tools in your mind to unpack or do away with other ideas, and also all the little nuggets of language will be there for you to make yourself sound better and understand future references in literature.

Got these yesterday

Started reading the Goebbels book first. Pretty comfy reading altogether.

...

Since this is a book related thread i have a question. My father just gave me a book by Napoleon Hill called Think and Grow Rich. Before i get to it so i know what to expect, how kiked or redpilled is that book ? Is it worth anything ? Since he gave it to me as a self betterment book , what do we have on that department ?

American Psycho - Bret Easton Ellis

How to Fail at Almost Everything and Still Win Big - Scott Adams

Influence, The Psychology of Persuasion - Robert B. Cialdini

Mind Hunter, Inside the FBI's Elite Serial Crime Unit - John E. Douglas

Swords into Plowshares - Ron Paul

The Hero With A Thousand Faces - Joseph Campbell

The Rational Male - Tomassi Rollo

You’ll be banned by the mods, you know.
>>>/sudo/28912

If you never read a book like that before, then it's a good start.

Yeah i am mostly into tech books, it's definitely a new department for me.

Then read: Zero to One, Notes on Startups, or How to Build the Future - Peter Thiel

Many thanks anons, grateful that my second home is there for me when i need it.

Robert Greene - 33 strategies of war

Robert Greene - 48 laws of power

Niccolo Machiavelli - The Prince

Marcus Aurelius - Meditations

Plato - the Republic

You'll come home a wise scholar.

...

...

Machiavelli is spoiled by your 'wise' list you have here.

(checked)
Nice hitler dubs theu can't be left unchecked.

There are so many laws that if you don't specialize and focus your attention on a tiny field you're completely overwhelmed and out of your element. No single man knows what the law is.

Even from this image Socialism looks preferable.

Point1+3 is simply wrong: Unlike Capitalist "Melting Pot" internationalism, Communist internationalism is more like unity of autonomies which preserve their nationality and culture all they like.

Pint2 sounds bad if you're some big ass land owner. Otherwise nothing changes, except government is accountable instead of some asshole who can just waste everything on coke, casino and cool cars..

What is the third position? Paganism?

youtube.com/playlist?list=PLP3MFbKgez_LbMpgUY4oYlsYAq0YNi2Le

discord.gg/sKJ7W7C
Holla Forums discussion thread

You can start by branching the main groups. You might not be able to know all the specifics, but you might know the law better than most lawyers (who simply pretend that they know the law).

If you did a law degree then you should use it as an opportunity to know a degree of depth to all law. Then maybe specialize in one or two areas.
But if we could start to challenge the decisions and the ratio decided in court, we might actually do something of worth here. All of a sudden you'd have a think tank that scrutinizes the decision making of judges, not just politicians. Policy tends to find some ground in the court nowadays, because the public is less likely to see it.

Holla Forums is right again

Too bad he's probably taken most of those ideas from someone else.

withendemanndom.blogspot.com/2014/07/slavoj-zizek-philosophaster-and_9.html

Hey we have some Ausie shitposting, we have some dating advice threads for degenerates, we have some Irish Protestant vs Irish Catholic threads.

But this thread needs to be shutdown. Need to make sure nobody on Holla Forums ever reads a book.

You COULD say that. Imkampfy aka Learningcode aka Rachposter is Antifa and continuously trying to dumb the board down by deleting all reading and redpilling threads while simultaneously keeping Holla Forums a censored pro-Trump hugbox where r/the_donald newfags feel at home and 4cuck rapefugees flood in while never being assimilated to anything more than meme-spouting retards. Thus, like non-whites in white countries, they are easily controllable by mod manipulation to attack anyone opposing their agenda to steer the entire board into eventual irrelevance and failure.

The whole reason this board is so heavily censored in the favor of Trump and the ebin 1488D chess meme is pushed is because (((Kushner))) specifically targeted us and infiltrated the mods 2 years ago. You have to remember that Kushner and Jim are both Masons. Remember that Trump ad linking to his campaign as early as 2015? That was part of Kushner's media campaign.

IRREFUTABLE ARTICLE EXPOSING 8/POL/ MODERATION THEY HAVE BANNED ME MULTIPLE TIMES FOR POSTING
Part 1: archive.is/NlVOe
Part 2: archive.is/AxgBy

Also the issue today is that society is secular.
That is the reason why the laws are so numerous. Nobody agrees on everything.

So you have to look between the lines to things that are impossible to disagree upon in human society. The lies that underlie how we arbitrate our disputes between one another.

Holy fuck, has Holla Forums seen this?
That's fucked.

Then why does this thread exist?

Of course, we never ever come to a conclusion of our own do we.
Especially when we know about psychological conditioning. You'd think we'd see through all that shit from day one :^)

Best book on national socialist philosophy is The Myth Of The Twentieth Century by Alfred Rosenberg.
It's hard to find a copy in English but I think there's a PDF floating around some where.

Anyway if it's not already under your belt if should be be top of your reading list. Alfred was one of our greatest minds and he was murdered at Nuremberg simply for writing down the national socialist philosophy.

I'm tired of holding back with the philosophy, we need to explore more how the universal law acts deferentially to the social, more immediate laws that we have. The law of laws.

Are there collection of pic 2 and 3? I have some of them frm /pdfs/ but cant find some I'd like to check out.

Just wait until this thread slides off the front page or the Imkikey shill brigade starts spamming and fabricating a reason to bumplock

It's wasy to come to a board consensus when all dissenting views are deleted :^)
Do you happen to be Holla Forums by any chance?

MacDonald provides a theoretical analysis and review of data on the widespread tendency among highly influential, Jewish-dominated intellectual movements to develop radical critiques of gentile culture that are compatible with the continuity of Jewish identification. These movements are viewed as the outcome of the fact that Jews and gentiles have different interests in the construction of culture and in various public policy issues (e.g. immigration policy, Israel). Several of these movements attempt to combat anti-Semitism by advocating social categorization processes in which the Jew/gentile distinction is minimized in importance. There is also a tendency to develop theories of anti-Semitism in which ethnic differences and resource competition are of minimal importance. From the perspective of the intellectual structures developed by these movements, anti-Semitism is analyzed as an indication of psychopathology among gentiles. In some cases, these movements appear to be attempts to develop a fundamental restructuring of the intellectual basis of gentile society in ways conducive to the continued existence of Judaism.

Particular attention is paid to Boasian anthropology, psychoanalysis, leftist political ideology and behavior, and the Frankfurt School of Social Research. Each of these movements can be characterized as an authoritarian political movement centered around a charismatic leader who strongly identified as a Jew and who was idolized by his disciples who were also predominantly Jewish. Regarding immigration policy, Jewish political and intellectual activity was motivated less by a desire for higher levels of Jewish immigration than by opposition to the implicit theory that America should be dominated by individuals with northern and western European ancestry. Jewish policy was aimed at developing an America charcterized by cultural pluralism and populated by groups of people from all parts of the world rather than by a homogeneous Christian culture and populated largely by people of European descent. This is a controversial analysis of particular interest to those concerned with evolutionary approaches to human behavior, with Judaica, and with an evolutionary perspective on history and psychology.

The Secret Teachings of All Ages is required reading for understanding the world's esoterica hollisticly.

You clearly are knew.
We were skeptical from day one. But you faggots always return to the same "LOOK YOU'RE BOARD IS A SAFE SPACE REEEEEEEEE" argument.
Perhaps most of the posts were deleted because they were shitposts and not because they criticised trump.

Of course you don't seem to want to push that idea so you proceed to continually screech about it - even in an unrelated thread like this.
So when you project
I get really annoyed. Because it is you that is shitting up this thread with an irrelevant post. You who seems to be obsessed with talking about "Trump's safespace" when he is still largely criticized by the media (yes he isn't given the peachy response people think the media is giving him).

Attack the policies. Not the forum it is discussed in.
Thanks for ruining the thread.

The works of Julius Evola should keep you very busy for quite a while.

The Spartans got it write when they made it so no man could write down the law.

Thanks for the belly rubs faggot. Now I'll tell you everything you want to know.

Third positionist is Holla Forums. Mildly economically socialist and radically socially conservative.
In contrast to the communist and capitalist ideologies in that pamphlet, third positionists believe in preserving and strengthening ones own Culture, Land and Race. They see government not as an eternal goal, but rather as merely the current vessel occupied by a people.

This is also why we are opposed to so called civic nationalism, that is loyalty to a proposition nation like the United States. Civic nationalists place the vessel above the contents, to their own doom, for without the people that created it, the state will not survive.

That seems deep bro.
Read the Myth of the twentieth century.

Just stop exposing us, goy!

They wern't, they were the same old repetitive questioning that the CTR shills used. It's annoying to have to answer them once, yet alone a million times. The fact the question comes up suggests that the faggot needs to lurk moar then question the more substantive matters like:
etc

It certainly is now that the mods loosened the criticism of Trump. While some are decent comments, most are rubbish meant to condition the mind.
When criticism occurs, it is easy to tell if it is valid or just a conditioning meme.

The fact you rely on this
business means you're not trying to contribute anything to this thread.

No more baiting.

Check out Hermann Loens if want more fiction, he was one of Ernst Juenger's favorite contemporary writers during the First World War. He ended up dying in the trenches at 48 years old.

Law student here. Policy never stopped finding ground in the court. Since Marbury v Madison and the idea of judicial review of laws to make sure they are "constitutional" (a power grab by the whole branch) the court system has become a fifth column giving power to crooks and legitimacy to the steady creep of nation wrecking. No surprise the it is full to the brim of anything but wasps, mainly jews, italians, irish, catholics, and the later deluge of minority hires.

They have a stated mission never to "legislate from the bench" in the same way that law professors will tell you "I'll do anything but hide the ball". Yet like the law schools who have another stated mission to rank all students based on grades regardless of actual standards of ability, the courts set themselves up with a vague mission to protect "constitutionality" from the "evil mob mentality" you find in Congress.

The net result is a series of canons, not written into law usually but present everywhere in judicial opinion like talking points on the network news:

> race, gender, nationality, age, sexual status, all are "suspect classifications", and policies based on them have to be just about bullet proof to survive the big push in the last 20 years is to just kill those policies too
> the "Charming Betsy": whenever possible, we should avoid making or interpreting laws in a way that would conflict with international law. this was the Supreme Court basically openly admitting to being a globalist think tank

I do think have any books on legal theory, especially criticisms of legal theory on hand, but I should be able to find some; also, the philosophical books mentioned here have a strong foundational tie with law, which is very much philosophical at heart. I will in the meantime try to slip the paywalls at uni and reprint for you guys the seminal article on why legal interpretation and by extension any litigious society is bullshit.

From german wikepedia:
Sounds like an interesting chap.

Read Theodore Ayrault Dodge's books about the great captains. The book on Alexander is incredible. Other than that read Xenophon's Anabasis. These should keep you busy for awhile.