Babies racially biased at 6 months

utoronto.ca/news/racial-bias-may-begin-babies-six-months-u-t-research-reveals


Wew lads. It's almost as though racial bias is a natural instinct… no, better "prescribe" some "solutions" for this "problem"

Other urls found in this thread:

articles.sun-sentinel.com/2006-03-31/news/0603310059_1_babies-love-books-new-moms-library-staff-members
media.8ch.net/file_store/9e2eb0eb652292458dd382099815fcf290ec7857045239dbc16ca4d9233ec824.pdf
media.8ch.net/file_store/b4d8d10f2160b260db8136973eecf608e4b89eb9801af6a95e1c1a84e0b37582.pdf
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lebensborn
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

You're right, the data is there but this doesn't shut libshits up, on the contrary it's merely a reason for them to force more diversity BS everywhere.

...

The life sciences are worthless.

They'd be fine without their Marxist interpretations. I mean, we have the data, no matter how much text is borrowed from sociology to rationalize it it will stay the same.

Except they have their Marxist interpretations.
Point being: The life sciences are worthless for convincing these people of anything, because they dismiss any and all life science/biological data out of hand whenever it suits them.

Science is the religion of the leftist, and like so many religious folk these days, they routinely engage in double-think as regards their religion.

Science doesn't exist solely to convince anyone of anything, moreso leftists who are convinced by practically nothing except times in which the programming isn't complete. It's a question you investigate, then share your (debatable) findings on the answers with others. That's why I said previously
meaning, it doesn't give a shit about any interpretation (the interpretation has no bearing on it).

That was a fucking fantastic book when I was a kid. Raptors, fuck yeah!

#1 book for children, alongside Call of the Wild.


That data has no value, however, unless it can be properly interpreted.
You can have all the data in the world on a given thing, but if you can't bring yourself to examine and analyze it genuinely, then its worthless.

The life sciences are rife with data that goes against, if not outright disproves, most leftist rhetorical paths; however, they simply ignore the data they don't like, or refuse/fail to analyze it or interpret it in a manner that provides value.
Thus, the life sciences are worthless - the data might as well not exist, at least, as regards the people in question.

Interpretation has ALL the bearing in terms of the value of a given data set.

You're right on the subject of interpretation, I reconsidered my statement since msot people can't be trusted to analyze bare data without a holding hand. However, data remains eternal (as long as there's some medium on which it can be stored, of course). The leftist clutch on the sciences and academia, on the other hand, is not, and therefore the data can always exist for a purpose if you work hard enough to get leftists out of these fields. With the scientific data we have on our hands, whoever manages to rule for the next 10 years will leave a legacy that echoes for a thousand. Just think of what could have been done had a nigger not been administrating NASA during the last 8 years.

Even dogs don't like niggers. And they are usually good judges of character.

I guess its time to start lobotomizing babies so they don't discriminate :^)

The ADL has a book for babies with multiethnic photos of other babies, to try to condition white babies. I have a link somewhere…

It's almost like there's a natural consciousness towards recognizing race, who knew.
I'm waiting for them to try to push giving babies away, fresh out of the hospital, to different race parents.

Science is not solely the domain of the left, talking like this is an insult to your ancestors.

Truly the best generation

My kid runs around the house yelling fucking niggers… Brings a tear to mein eye.

The religion of the left is a corrupted form of science that invents its own truths. What they preach is not science at all.. if it were they wouldnt be filthy kike obeying commies.

articles.sun-sentinel.com/2006-03-31/news/0603310059_1_babies-love-books-new-moms-library-staff-members

" Last month, all new moms who deliver at Glades General began receiving the baby board book All Kinds of … Todo Tipo De … Tout Kalite … as part of a free, Babies Love Books packet from the Palm Beach County Library System.

The idea is that newborn babies, not yet able to speak much less read, can be exposed to a message of tolerance.

The book, in English, Spanish and Creole, is filled with photographs of people of all ages, races and sizes. Developed by the Anti-Defamation League, the Early Childhood Initiative Foundation and the Family Learning Partnership in Miami-Dade County, the book was created to encourage parents to read with their children and help families learn to respect different cultures as well as recognize similarities among people.

In the past few years, the ADL has shifted the focus of its anti-bias and diversity programs to early childhood, said Marcie Shaughnessy, project director for the ADL's A World of Difference Institute in Palm Beach County.

"We've found that if we want to stop hatred in the world, we really need to start at a young age," Shaughnessy said. "The whole concept is trying to teach acceptance and respect, really before children form their opinions at such a young age."

The book has been distributed in Miami-Dade County for about a year. In Belle Glade, where about 53 percent of the residents are functionally illiterate, officials in the Palm Beach County Glades' branch are using the book as part of their literacy efforts. "

WEW I thought I would never be shocked again by the stupidity of commies

commies and kikes*

Mirrored the articles.
Older but not younger infants associate own-race faces with happy music and other-race faces with sad music: media.8ch.net/file_store/9e2eb0eb652292458dd382099815fcf290ec7857045239dbc16ca4d9233ec824.pdf
Infants Rely More on Gaze Cues From Own-Race Than Other-Race Adults for Learning Under Uncertainty: media.8ch.net/file_store/b4d8d10f2160b260db8136973eecf608e4b89eb9801af6a95e1c1a84e0b37582.pdf

It seems beyond just the life sciences, a lot of modern academia is pozzed, even biology. Evolution is real, and humans evolved to what they are now (lol dum krishuns) but they're still the exact same despite living in different conditions that can lead to evolution.

It's almost as if Humans have an in group preference on a Genetic level huh? Really Dilated the imagination.

The thing I ask the shitlibs is how much do these implicit biases result in discrimination in hiring, etc. It being there doesn't mean it has much of an effect or is the reason there is "not enough diversity" in STEM or whatever. Also isn't the fact that there is all this celebrate diversity shit all over the place demonstrate that they don't amount to much?

I dont believe this shit for a second tbh, not for humans anyway. I believe in pre-curser races and ancient, advanced civilizations and we're the product of tens of thousands of years of de-evolution/life blood dilution.

Based babies

Ok. But even if you believe we have diluted from a purer form, that's still a form of evolution user. It's not always improvement. But I still wonder about that as well, I mean, we have breeding organizations for dogs, why not a breeding program for people? Just to see where it leads.

That is why the conclusion on my end has been no conversation with the other side but sheer brutality. I abhor these cunts and they deserve all the pain that is to be extracted. We must secure and existence for White people and a future for our children.

And just adding on, this board generally talk about controlled breeding, but even then, it's usually based off of things like eye or hair color, which does give you a good idea, but it's still not very precise. There should exist a professional and informed breeding program. And now that I think about, I have no doubt one does exist, at least in the hands of some secret group out there.

do you mean social sciences ?

life sciences include medicine, biochemistry, biology, etc.

Übermensch. Hitler had such a program just for this inside the reich. He had his best men breeding with his best women to produce superior offspring. Perhaps another user that is lurking can point you in the right direction in this field as I do not have the sources readily available. Perhaps you will seek this out yourself.

But I disagree that our dilution is an evolution. Evolution implies advancment, growth, adaptation, developement. Look aroud, you see any of that in modern man, within the white race? I see stagnation and even reversion to a baser form of existence.

Here is a wiki link to what you're looking for: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lebensborn

From there you can start searching yourself if you want it.

Fair enough, we agree on the concept, just divided by semantics. I don't see genetic progress being made as a whole either. But in the literal sense, evolution doesn't always mean progress, even though it should.


Yeah, I'm familiar with the National Socialist breeding program, I'm just saying we should reintroduce some form of it, because with our tech advancements we should be able to do it even more effectively. The biggest impediment is political correctness right now.

And I believe even something like the lebensborn program was just the National Socialists rediscovering an ancient practice in the modern world. Much of our ancestors were smarter then we sometimes give them credit for. I wouldn't be surprised to find out about a breeding program tens of thousands of years old.

In that case a mix of IVF (within white couples) and an idea that the SS had after the won was over and won, which was stationing large SS battalions/divisions all over the Reich to help replenish Aryan "racial stock" naturally.

Many women who go through IVF usually come out with more than 1 kid, practically guaranteed.

The fedora shills are getting more subtle with their bullshit, I'll give them that much.