The Politics of Gore

Is gore the ultimate redpill?

Dead people are one of the only things guaranteed to be produced by an evolution of people. It's 100% guaranteed that everyone dies eventually and the laws of physics dictates that people will die in a vast variety of ways.

Gore is literally one of the most common aspects of biological existence but modern society has allowed us to shield 90% of the people from it's reality. In a first world country typically the only people to experience extreme gore, first-hand, are emergency workers, the military, victims of crime and the occasional construction worker.

It's often impossible to speak to some people about the realities of Mexico, Brazil, Africa, and Mid-Sandland because they're in no way informed enough to comprehend the reality of brutality.

It's rarely addressed in normie IRL forums because it's upsetting. The people who are so unexposed, to the point they lack the ability to hold an objective discussion on the subject, are most likely too ill-advised to make any decisions on the future of their groups' ultimate survival.

What is a 'healthy' approach to viewing gore? Is gore wrong?

Does a good human being aim to reduce general gore?

Do gore videos on the internet increase or decrease your quality of life?

Listen to Solomia
post gore

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_economics
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Mexicans and Muslims all witness and participate in an extreme amount of gore, yet they are both wildly marxist. Hypothesis disproven.

Spics, mudslimes and other subhumans torture, rape and otherwise make others suffer for their own enjoyment. Whites generally possess sympathy, empathy and the desire to limit suffering. Ergo, enjoying gore is the glorification and embodiment of degenerate tendencies.
tl;dr - fuck off

What the fuck happened to the quality of that?

I'll try again

Death in general is an unpleasant reality to be overcome through innovation and conquering of 'human nature', as so many other unpleasant realities have been conquered before it. Mind you, it's a good thing to keep around until all of the subhumans get to enjoy it.

Gore used to be the rite of initiation in chan culture. It was our wall against the foreign hordes. But it also has a secondary, internal role: it both hardens and awakens the user. As a normal person you can't watch gore and be unphased. The normie reaction would be to look away and erase the memory of it, the user reaction is to be angered such brutality is allowed to exist. It is then when the user realises that if you want peace, you've got to prepare for war, and joins the fray as best he can.
SI VIS PACEM PARA BELLUM

Transhumanism is jewish as fuck.

Secular religion for atheists who fear death.

Mexicans and Muslims are great at disseminating fresh gore because they're unevolved animals. While a few monkeys with cameras in their phones can gladly create some of the most gruesome atrocities imaginable, white people are capable of violence on a scale unimaginable to 99% of people but they don't glorify the distribution of the HD footage.

At what point does a civilisation decide to limit its exposure to gore and at what point does this decision begin to harm civilisation as a whole?

Let me guess, the kike on the stick? Rabbi Yeshua is definitely the less Jewish of the options, you got me. There's nothing inherently Jewish about transcending our current biological limits, even if the idea is popular among kikes for their own purposes as well. They want to use it for control purposes, we should be seeking it for liberation.

I said nothing at all about Christianity one way or the other, so cool it with the non-arguments.

Yeah distribution of gore is the ultimate redpill but gore itself isn't. Mailing hundreds of pictures of dead Palestinian babies to the White House would probably be as effective as Ivanka's little cry-in.

wow bro very edgey wow very cool&deep wow
ithink gore is a good thiing cuz i mean its literally a red (as in goreo) pill

That's the one video I still have not watched on my years on the chans, from the descriptions I've read, that is one the worst ones.

To continue the nice reality, where death is ignored as much as possible, eventually it's most likely going to require a lot of death; Through nature taking its course or humans making an attempt to be humane about the situation. There are 500 million niggers in Africa with an IQ below 80, this fact in and of itself is unsustainable without foreign intervention. The three choices are:

1) Continue feeding the niggers indefinitely [leading to the feeding of niglets but that's outside the scope of this hypothesis]
2) Stop feeding the niggers and let them starve to death to the point that their population naturally stabilises, over a gruesome period of 100 years
3) Stop feeding the niggers and execute the bottom 80th percentile with a cheap, humane, mechanism

Don't be a fucking pussy. How else are you going to know what it sounds like to be partially beheaded by a blunt sickle?

Well, I suppose that's true, never know when that will come in handy I suppose.

Lol u wut nigger?

Islamic Gommunism is a thing.

Look at the kurds.

It was only a guess. If you've got some other brand of religious faith, I'd provide a personalized kikedness assessment for that if it were requested.


You don't have to be a cunt about it. As much as I support a European-directed transhumanism, I also support your right to opt in/out for whatever end you wish. If you've got faith to adhere to, go for it. I don't think we should all be expected to cease our development because someone has faith, though.

As I said, keep death around for the subhumans. Really basically anyone that isn't either European or one of the better Asian races shouldn't waste our space and resources. Although another application of transhumanism done right could elevate naturally worthless races up to our level, so it may not necessarily require any form of genocide. It depends on what we develop when, what it enables and what it requires to implement. In any case, the current situation of being massively outnumbered by utterly valueless retarded shitskins should not continue.

But there's a persistant moral question that's yet to be addressed satisfactorily; Do we keep feeding them?

How do the collective males of the collective white civilisation lie to their collective wives about taking a tour of the Middle-East and Africa to humanely destroy 1 billion pests? Cancel normie media for a week and send them all for a spa-break in Iceland?

It's the truth.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_economics

Fucking fight club, but instead of splicing in frames of porn, it should be frames of gore.

Holla Forums is exceptional because thinking the unthinkable is the norm. There are no thought police other than the ferocious competition of other ideas. And to survive here, one's mind must be exposed to the unthinkable. It is true freedom of thought, an unrestricted realm of ideas.

Any lawyerfags know the laws on gore in the US? Is it considered obscenity?

this, honestly. We evolved with violence, disease and death all around us. Dead bodies on display on the side of the road. Now that it's removed from daily life, it seeps in anyway. Tough guys with skull tee-shirts, girls cutting themselves, etc.

I'm not sure at what point, but we do eventually begin limiting and hiding away the death and suffering from the public eye. It's now seen as uncomfortable by most people, and we forget our fragile humanity.

Having trouble watching this oneā€¦ Fuck..

Build the fucking wall

Damn I aint a tough guy no more

These savages should be hunted down and shot

In the end I think gore raises your death instinct and it can somber you long-term. The study of death and violence does make you stronger in ways though.

I think it does nothing to prepare one for such things IRL. I do think people here are less likely to be swayed into action by a few dead kids being waved around

USA is typically considered one of the freest countries in this regard, pretty sure it's protected under freedom of speech stuff.

Honestly, Hollywood does a good job at desensitizing people to video gore, real or not. As for in-person gore, I don't know if it holds up.

A "red-pill" occurs when you are confronted by evidence that shows that one of your beliefs is wrong, recognise that the beliefs was wrong and then re-evaluating your world view in light of this new information.

Gore isn't a red-pill at all. You've just gotten desensitised to it, that's all. I think most of us have.

That having been said, an acknowledgment and awareness of mortality is necessary to the successful navigation of life. And, yes, modern society has allowed us to shield 90% of the people in the west from that reality. People these days seem to live in the moment and do not think of the future.

The harm begins immediately. Our society is trash because of how sanitized death and life is here in the west.