Who's jewing who?

CIA GOOD GUYS NOW?

Apparently the CIA briefed Trump that they believe Assad was not responsible for the chemical attack.

Other urls found in this thread:

zerohedge
breitbart
abcnews.go.com/US/syrian-jets-off-air-base-hit-us/story?id=46646770
archive.is/IswtO
archive.is/SfYsA
archive.is/669zZ
archive.is/kFKI0
cnn.com/2017/04/06/middleeast/syria-idlib-chemical-attack/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

I think cernovich might be right here. It's McMaster and his DoD clique.

But to clarify, that doesn't mean CIA are the good guys at all. There are no good guys in ZOG.

Here's the article:

consortiumnews.com/2017/04/08/where-was-cias-pompeo-on-syria/

archive.is/e0vX1

Another source that agrees with that assessment:

zerohedge .com/news/2017-04-08/former-cia-officer-intelligence-confirms-russian-account-syria

Also interesting from this source:

Other sources claimed that Kushner was in favor of the strike and wanted to "punish" Assad, which seems to contradict this one.

who's jewing who indeed.

groucho marxism best marxism

There's a massive disinformation campaign going on right to a degree where even I have no idea what in the goddamn is happening.

This is their aim. Nothing is concrete and all we have is speculation.

MK Ultra alone probably precludes the CIA from ever being good guys.

AGAIN, TO OUR VERY FOOLISH LEADER, DO NOT ATTACK SYRIA - IF YOU DO MANY VERY BAD THINGS WILL HAPPEN & FROM THAT FIGHT THE U.S. GETS NOTHING! - someguy

Trump knows the gas attack was fake, Syria knows it, Russia knows it and Holla Forums knows it. And the CIA knows that Trumps knows. If the CIA continue to push that Assad gassed the people, they will lose ALL credibility and Trump will go elsewhere for his intelligence.

Since Trump obviously doesn't have any issues bombing countries based on obviously fake intelligence, I'm not sure why the latter would be true. He represents jewish interests and he's going to do what the jews who control him want him to do.

If this isn't a massive chess move, then Trump is an idiot. It's come down to that. Waiting and hoping…

The CIA aren't static, like any organisation in history they change hands as power shifts through the generations. Look at how much Edgar hated pinko commies and niggers for example. Then under the Obama admin, the CIA, FBI, and White House were all head by literal "former" communist sympathizers.

He's not an idiot. He's a liar who was running a con. He told people what they wanted to hear and never had any intention of doing any of it. It doesn't matter if you vote him out as long as the foreign policy behind the scenes stays the same and the agenda is advanced. Bush is used up, change to the Obama brand. Obama is used up, change to the Trump brand.

Read Tragedy and Hope. This is how the system is DESIGNED.

So you dont care about the Pentagon warning Russia to evacuate beforehand? Or that the airstrips were still usable the next day?

CIAniggers to CIAryans? Eh, not feeling it.

fuck off shill. no one has the needed variables right now to judge that. your shill shit doesn't work.

Consider these things… Damage done was minimal to the airbase, very few if any dead, reports of missiles intercepted. All signs of a failed operation.

Or was it failed on purpose? Trump pretends to play along with NeoCon/ZOG plans, he fires the missiles, tells Russia about it ahead of time, makes a big show for Xi and the world, all while doing basically…. nothing. He sits back and watches the reactions of people. See how it all plays out.

What bombing. They hit a runway that was quickly repaired. No one knows where the pics of the airport even come from. Trump informed the Russians and by proxy Syria of the "attack". Trump launched a fake attack for a fake gassing. Sabre rattling at its finest. The general public think that the gas attack was real thanks to the white helmet propaganda. Trump had to be seen to do something by the general population.

Trump is in a very difficult position. He's being attacked from all sides and he doesn't have anyone he can trust, not even his own family. He can still barely fulfill all the positions he's required to because he doesn't know enough men trustworthy enough to fill them. At least for now he's gotten a SCOTUS judge in under all the chaos and one that ensured Scalia's coincidental death wasn't for naught.

Like with most federal agencies there are a lot of good guys in the rank and file and the pedo satanist MIC faction of the CIA is a specific minority clique, CIA is so compartmentalized that they are all small guys and no one is really in charge. Pompeo might not be part of that faction.

Official word out of Russia is they think it was aggression against a sovereign state and a violation of international law. As for the airstrip being in good condition, the Syrians are saying their planes were destroyed – which would clearly be of more value to ISIS fighters on the ground than some airstrip which could be filled, leveled and paved quickly. And following that up, was the damage supposedly minimal because the US wasn't trying or because only 23 of the 59 missiles actually got through defenses?

Because it destroys their narrative they've been pushing since mid 2016, 'muh russia'. It's a double bluff, they know their statement is correct.


Yes, it's the neo-cons. They are the last bastion of Zionist cancer along with that Kusher that needs to be stamped out. Also how is Soros still not declared a persona non grata?

We don't know the backroom politics, was this what Trump had to agree to in order to get approval for his American policies they vetoed? Who knows.

You know what I would do if I was trump? I would make sure fucking nobody has any clue what's going to happen next. The more disinformation thats out in the open, the stronger a negotiating position he has. Its like the shills have never read any of his books, or even political theory at all. They should go back to playing life is tumblr tbh.

The problem with this theory is, Trump fucking dismantled the public trust in their system: the media, the deep state, etc. That completely undermines them. How can they continue the narrative if nobody believes the media anymore?

And it seems like this move only further ruins the media's credibility because of how they made a complete 180 and suddenly started praising Trump just because he dropped some bombs on a Syrian airport. Think about it. Trump spent all this time emphasizing that people shouldn't trust the media. Now the media is telling people that we should support taking out Assad because convenient chemical weapons?

I don't know, it seems like if his plan was to betray us all along, it's the stupidest and most poorly thought out plan I've ever seen, because nobody is falling for it, and it was obvious all along that nobody would fall for it. At least half of Trump voters won't support taking out Assad, and almost everyone who voted against him wont support it just because it's Trump. So how could he possibly sustain such a ridiculously unpopular war?

If this was really the plan, then they're much more retarded than we ever thought possible. But it seems more likely to me that he's not trying to betray us, he's just not as redpilled as we thought so he's falling for kike tricks. But the kikes who are tricking him are pretty stupid if they think the public will support it.

And that's where I see the most hope: If Trump sees how absurdly unpopular the idea is, I hope he'll come to the conclusion that his advisors are fucking retarded and fire them over it.


This is true, but that doesn't help us in trying to figure out what the fuck is going on.

Do you trust "Official words"? What about "unofficially"? When actions do not match words, pay attention and figure out what happened.

This, madman theory cuts both ways we have no fucking idea what he is planning.

You're watching them do it live, right now. What the fuck are you even talking about?

If an organization has ever been capable of implementing that plan and chose to do so, I'm not going to trust that they aren't still implementing such plans on some level elsewhere nor consider their continued existence anything short of offensive.

CAN YOU IDIOTS STOP POSTING COMMENTS FROM TWITTER AS A NEW DEVELOPMENT ALREADY


FUCK@!

What are YOU talking about? How is a narrative sustained if nobody believes it? The media are just talking to themselves at this point. I'm waiting for public opinion polls on Syrian intervention to start coming out, but so far I don't see any evidence that it's going to look good for them. There was a poll a few days ago from the UK where there were only like 18% in support of it. I doubt it'll be significantly higher in the US.

The narrative is that Trump is a hothead, too rash and ineffective to be in power.

I'm convinced Trump responded to a false flag with his own false flag.

With cruise missiles launched on the authority of the executive. Filtered.

No. I mean your Hillary saying that she has a clean bill of health.


You mean the cruise missiles that did no real substantial damage by hitting a runway and maybe a sacrificed MIG21? Do you honestly think that they would have kept the aircraft on base for the attack? They would have been moved just in case there was a stray missile (we're talking about the burgers here.

Filtered.

Christ it's like i'm in a living nightmare.

bump, this should be sticky not trash about chess.

Bump

FUCKIN' A MAN

I don't know what you're going on about, cruise missiles aren't a narrative. You seem confused. My point is if this was their plan, it's obviously going to backfire because nobody supports it. So either the attack was just for show, or Trump is going to find himself fighting an impossibly uphill battle against public opinion to try to justify and sustain a war against Assad.

Well considering the fact that fucking nothing has happened other than the us moving a carrier group to norkland, it doesn't seem like there's gonna be a sustained war. When nothing happens next week arr you fags gonna resort to posting cuck porn?

CIA MAN

underrated post

I warned you about this god-emperor stuff a long time ago.

State Dept. is full of Offensive Realists (Political Science IR school of thought). They probably work with DoD, who are likely the same.

Too few remember that at our core we're about ideas, not a man.
We're a movement, not a cult of personality.
We need to criticize when necessary to prevent fumbles and mistakes. This shilling hasn't really let us do that. I fear a lot of insight and analysis has slipped through the cracks due to the chaff.

It does seem like the Pentagon are the ones pushing this shit, so if it turns out that the CIA was opposed to it I wouldn't be surprised. here's the Pentagon's bullshit story:

breitbart .com/national-security/2017/04/09/pentagon-lays-out-case-for-missile-strikes-against-syria/

It's entirely possible that the CIA and the Pentagon are not on the same side. There was an article from not too long ago that reported that the CIA was funding and arming one group of terrorists in the Middle East while the Pentagon was funding and arming another group of terrorists, but these two groups were fighting each other.

Ive posted this numerous times.

Trump did the attack because the kikes tried to shit test him. He knew the gas attack was an entirely fabricated report. He executed a surgical strike that destroyed nothing important and killed no one. He did the attack because the kikes gave him the opportunity to trap them bad. And the kikes are still fucking falling for it as is most of the fucking world apparently. The kikes cant help themselves they have to attack Trump. They are going to release within 1 weeks time that it was a completely false report that "Trump acted so rashly over". But thats the trap. The second that happens Trump has all of them over a barrel with crimes of treason, and war crimes, for almost causing a war with their lies.

What if the guy was simply not invited?
Or did not want to come?
And then they make up this narrative after the fact, to confuse onlookers(like us).

(just imagine mindfugg.jpg here pls.)

Its odd seeing it in action like this.
I mean, I've seen stuff before, but this is a new level for me.

polite sage for being a double posting faggot

They are trying to get back all the credibility they lost with all their stuff in the past and not look like they had a role with whats happening now.

We are feeling the chaos.

Unfortunately, it seems Trump has no power any more. He won't fire anyone (except Bannon). The deep state kikes got their noses into him.

That's pretty far-fetched to believe that the neokikes would come out and admit that it was a false flag. I suppose it could all be a 4D chess move to reveal that the Pentagon neocons are full of shit and use it as an excuse to drain the swamp there, but it seems doubtful that such a drastic move was necessary for that. I'm just too skeptical of all of it at this point. I'll wait and see, but I'm not getting my hopes up anymore.

Thus cementing his own fate, a ridiculous move.

Trump cemented his fate the day he added the first kike to his cabinet.

Even if that airbase was already up and operating sgain with warplanes taking off to bomb rebel forces?

Then we should put this theory to test.
#FireKushner was an attack on his family, and too easily spinned by the usual slimos into "it's anti-semitic propaganda"
We should do another one, maybe remind him about the promise to take out ISIS?
#TakeOutISIS, #ISISisTheEnemy, #FightISISnotAssad, something like this, but with more normie appeal?

Which is more likely:

A) Trump is 100% /ourguy/ and is locked in an anime-plot chess battle with the deep state and his own family members. Political brinkmanship with Russia, China, et al, advancing the establishment policy on Syria is an elaborate ruse.

B) Trump is nominally /ourguy/ and the executive branch is largely powerless before the deeply entrenched ruling elite and their thousands of servants, carefully selected and groomed for maximum sociopathy. He must reluctantly obey.

C) Trump is completely indifferent to our welfare, ideals and survival, so he just told us what we wanted to hear for the votes. His loyalties are evidenced by realized preferences (Goldman appointees, immediate family ties to skeezy Jews, marginalizing nationalist staff). He's balancing the Zionist agenda with maintaining enough popularity for re-election.

Hint:only two of these options are plausible

I think anons are having a melt-down because they're being faced with evidence that they shouldn't have believed their own propaganda. I think that we shouldn't deceive ourselves to avoid feeling used. This administration was never going to be the solution. The election awakened whites to some critical realizations: 1- We have to start demanding political policies that are in our own best interest. 2- Be direct. Be aggressive. Supplicating the left gets you nowhere. 3- The left cannot be reasoned or bargained with. It's a tent for suicidal hipsters and brown people (or mammals, anyway).

Don't feel badly that Trump didn't live up to the hype because he couldn't. Our fight for survival is far from over. This will be (barring a kill-off) a multi-generational struggle. Note that Gen Z is more right leaning than ever. We haven't won, but we are winning the culture war.

#FightISISnotSyria i think would be better. Assad is still seen as a "dictator" by normies, but Syria as a nation is more abstract and less easy to demonize. it holds connotations of the "Syrian people" who are all poor and oppressed and here we are, big bad mean imperialist America coming in and making things worse when we should #FightISISnotSyria instead.

And the next fake gas attack now means every kike in the cabinet, just like Tillerson and Haley are doing, will make Trump act again, he has no out, he made a stupid decision for zero good reason other than he's compromised or fucking retarded, and I know he's not retarded.

The CIA is not a monolithic entity. It has different factions, some of which know about each other and are at odds on some things. It's office politics with a vengeance.

people are missing the fact that russia challenged trump to do something, regardless of whether it was a false flag he was called out. he just showed that he will drop bombs.

this article is just probing for an angle that will make trump look like a wildcard

but the cia said it was a false flag!
but the cia was frustrated at his lack of response! hes a russian spy!

in trumps case he went ahead and took the move that made him look strong and responded to russias challenge

post source where Russia challenged him? I've never heard of this

This is what happens when you let cunts and kikes into your administration
Ivanka and her kike husband should be fired

Along with the neocons.

You outed yourself as a kike here; you threw in "Trump is not an idiot" then proceeded to spout the stereotypical D&C lines, then when someone called you on your D&C bullshit you fell back on "but…but… I said Trump wasn't an idiot, goyi… guy!". That is a classic jewish tactic…

IIRC, CIA is backing al nusra while DoD is backing the Kurds.

Yeah the shilling is stronger than it's ever been. It wasn't even this bad during the campaign. Maybe because we caught the zionists with their pants down by calling out the false flag. Now they're throwing up an ink cloud and trying to hide long enough for the public to forget about it.

Responding doesn't make him look strong. It makes him look like a sentimental idiot who is easily swayed.

I don't understand why you're so buttflustered over this, especially since he stated unequivocally that they would not invade Syria. It was the correct move to make.

Zero casualties is fake news

You're most likely correct. Although, I think the majority of the shilling is coming from the fact the shills smell the blood in the water from the April 1st hack. If you follow that through with the fact the April 1st hack was most likely related to the gas attack false flag; you start to realize where all this is coming from. (((mp4 related)))

How many deals do he have to make with politicians, user? The man has the power to crash a companies stock with a single tweet. 13 seats (?) are coming up for election and if those niggers don't want to play ball, all Trump has to do is give the thumbs down, and the other guy wins. He can literally go to a rally tomorrow, and say that Schummer is doing X, fuck that guy, let's get someone else elected, and the jew will be the deadest lame duck senator the world has ever seen.

So why doesn't he???

Which is intentional on the shills part. They want less focus on talking analysis, strategy and contingencies and more on polarizing Holla Forums on Trump to a point of extremism. It's an attempt to break down communication.

"The State" isn't "one thing," so there's never any reason to believe that one bureaucracy would be on "the same side" as any other… though to be sure you'd expect them not to be directly acting against each other at the same time.

Insightful post, I agree. Perhaps you're right. We memed too hard, now to avoid a seemingly cognitively dissonant opinion, anons have started blindly defending Trump. It's also worthy to note there's a large contingency of legit retards and shills doing this too. Evident by the post election, remember all the "What do we do now?" Posters? Yeah.

Dude, the founders would disagree. Each branch was made to try to fuck over the other two. It was designed that way. Are you even Clapistani? That's Civics 101.

Who keeps saying this?
Seems most likely
No.

Considering the redpilling opportunities Trump's victory opened up, it gave Holla Forums plenty of time to expand its own influence as a fail-safe option in case Trump didn't meet expectations. So the answer to that question back then was, continue to position Holla Forums as an independent player while taking advantage of the populism.

If anything, Trump's base is now willing to be harsh on him again. The sycophantic behaviour of most of the internet since his election has turned into criticism. Hopefully it will work to keep Trump in line. He needs us to be uncompromising anons.

It's a shit show. Imagine having to deal with all these different factions and their agendas. In theory the President is the most powerful person but that's not true, he's the most powerful hostage.

Reminder: there's a rally in Palm Beach, FL on April 18th. Bring your DESTROY ISIS NOT ASSAD banners or things like that. Send him a clear message you don't want regime change in Syria. Trump needs to see with his own eyes his supporters remind him he wasn't elected to topple Assad.

Because they will just set up kosher "alternate media" like Alex Jones, Cernobitch, TRS and others. They might be "alternate media" but, they will still be kosher. So Trump undermining trust in the mainstream media means nothing.

explain to me leftypol how they are kosher when they are the most outspoken critics of dying for Israel?

No I think the runway wasn't hit, they destroyed the cafeteria or something. It's hard to know what exactly happened. Even with the initial incident, the chemical attack, we don't know what happened. It was likely the rebels who had the Sarin and when they were bombed they exploited the opportunity to put the blame on Assad.

Liar.

The runway wasn't hit because as Trump said in his tweet it could be easily repaired.

abcnews.go.com/US/syrian-jets-off-air-base-hit-us/story?id=46646770

This is what that famous MGS codec referred to as "creating context". There's only so much information Trump can give us directly, that we have to resort to our old enemy: The media. Then they start to gain the upper hand, because we are forced to play in their expertise field, with their rules. This is the world of mass journalism.

Now, it is clear to the intelligent person that they have their own interests in mind (supposedly ours), thus, they will use any power they have to shift the narrative. No theories are disproven as of today, and no one is wrong, yet. Seriously, you can right now feel validated if you are anti-Trump just as much as if you are pro-Trump.

Media is setting up a new conglomerate of ideas, of memetic warfare. Only those directly involved in Syria, those who are in contact with the real fight now the truth about what is taking place right now. Then we got the average Holla Forumsack, searching through independent sources and comparing with whatever the MSM is spouting right now. In third place, we have the ignorant masses, blindly following and parroting such nonsense.

Look carefully at the recent headlines: Most are implicitly advocating for a new Cold War, by testing the waters of their audience, and creating the appropriate responses in the form of new blog opinions, live reports and interviews. Data mining at it's finest. This is when insane amounts of analytics and polls come in handy: They work because you can quickly change your narrative as long as your previous one connects with this new, polished one.

I agree with Jonestein on this sentence: There's a war on for your mind, it is up to you to believe or reject whatever is presented in front of you.

This.

I think the CIA is finally right on something.
Which makes it twice as suspicious.

So this attack on Syria is more an attack on the media? To make for example Brian 'Beautiful Missiles' Williams on MSNBC look even more foolish and untrustworthy than he already is?


That's what I'm worried about, the next false flag attack.


Exactly. I don't like it.

This thread is full of shills.

What?

better check whatever "news" headline CNN is running too. good luck with that.

Absolutely, nobody here is sure what is going on anymore.

That means that the "elite" are free to do what they want and unless you're initiated into that club you won't know what is going on.

It seems like we need to turn into wikileaks. If they won't tell the truth, we'll steal it.

It means it's time to create your own brand and your own media. You can whine about Thernovich all you want but he built his own audience. He was some kind of PUA poseur a few years ago then he transitioned into Self-Help and then he became friends with Scott Adams, etc. and now he has enough influence to influence the news cycle and public opinion.

The lesson? Stop whining, start a news website and build your own audience and you might end up with enough influence to influence the news cycle and public opinion.

Cont.
Now, how do they create a new context? It is easy from their perspective since they have positioned themselves as the main channels of information. They just have to apply a few tricks:
First, they start by being biased, pre-fabricating a narrative in their articles and reportings. Notice how some of them dropped "President" before "Al-Assad" and replaced it with "Dictator", notice how it is not just "Syria" but "the Syrian regime".
This is what manipulating language is, creating a bias inside their readers' mind. This has been the rule for many years.

Second, and as I stated before, they test the waters; the purpose of this is to keep their userbase caged, or to redirect their narrative, if they are not aligned with it. Polls, interviews and comments are the key here. It allows them to quickly continue or stop with their approach.

Then, they have backup plans in case they are called out by the people. For example, if some news outlet or newspaper took a "Trump is misguided" approach, but it turns out he wasn't, they quickly change it, by deleting the original article/report, by stating that it was just a blog post, or simply by highlighting certain news that help them create a smooth shift of their narrative. They proceed now to drown their original context and shove a new one down our throats by bombing their readers with new content. They also choose to completely ignore certain news and report on those that suit them.

Finally, if you cannot be coerced, they label you as "fake news" or "tinfoil hat", they ostracize your line of thinking and they make sure whatever you say gets dismissed since "we have paid reporters there and you not!" and "we are a decades old corporation, obviously we know better than you!"
Of course, who could doubt any media corporation with reporters covering Syria 24/7 and "experiencing firsthand the horrors of the war", talking with these "poor, opressed victims of the evil empire of Al-Assad, who eats babies for breakfast and murders cute animals".

What is happening is whatever the US MIC decides is happening. Rumsfeld spelled this out for us. There are known unknowns etc. fuck you all WE MAKE REALITY. Don't worry too much about it.

We literally have 1984 where we do not know a certain scope of info unless we are extremely wealthy.
All is well?

We need urgent revolution.

sssshhhhh …..

SHADILAY my brother.

No misguided dreams, only memes now …

Fuck off.

Trump is a fucking distraction. We need a real revolution. Time to fight fucking back, organize actually right wing rallies. Secure specific military targets.

I don't care if it's suicidal.

And we should start by killing soros.

It is suicidal. The MIC has resources you are hardly capable of dreaming of. The question is, and always was, do you have any faith in the MIC forwarding your particular interests.

And that will stop us?
Because I no longer fear death. This society is becoming unbearable to live in.

Who is MIC?

What do you have in mind?

In order to subdue your fears, let me state the following: YES, the MIC knows from where intelligence springs, they have known since after WW1 when they tested ~ 1,700,000 men. Do you really imagine they would leave that kind of intelligence alone, for anyone to exploit?

Calm the fuck down.

That you no longer fear death is highly commendable. However, do you perhaps fear life and its attendant duties? Are they truly unbearable?

Please, keep at it.

Local chicken tendies stores.

I would not discuss that here. But I am interested in seeing if there is interest.

I take it the MIC are the NHK?

WTF the MIC are simply the Military Industrial Complex. GTFO with your nonsense.

The military industrial complex is a facade for something else user.
In fact it's one poisonous cog in a web of poisonous cogs that are destroying our countries.

No. There is only one cog. The cog that can go ahead and tell the world that they have no idea what happened to all that money, and keep spinning along nonetheless. Prove me wrong.

Perhaps you do not value enough the revitalization of "our countries". Do you think that if Europeans where left to their own devices, they might have seen the folly of their democracy and universal equality in time? No one has time for that user.

...

Yet that cog seems to be bitching at other cogs?
Of course there may be inadvertently a giant cog created from these cogs.
cog cog cog cog cog AAAAAAAAAAA


Oh I love the vibrant revitalization that is occurring :^)

Twitter is not that reliable, shit not even my most die hard liberal relatives takes twitter seriously.


archive.is/IswtO
archive.is/SfYsA
archive.is/669zZ
archive.is/kFKI0

Somehow you seem to be under the delusion that the greatest concentration of brains, capital and military might ever to manifest on this earth does not know exactly what it is doing. Nothing is beyond their reach. Orient yourselves accordingly.

I can't even trust many of the things posted on any social media or the MSM anymore.
We're fucked.

Nobody is properly scrutinizing their sources anymore.
The evidential standards are so poor that we never know if something truly happened.


You got the capital and military might down.
The brains are lacking though.
In fact they can't break the mould that they construe for themselves.

Look here son. Putin hired himself some faggot to organize pro AND anti fascist rallies. That faggots background? Theater, of course.

That is all that is needed to manage a bunch of 12 year olds. A fag with a background in theater. So much for "democracy." The system originating with the invention of central banks and stock markets has spread its wings and now engulfs almost the entire world. It has invested the lions share of its resources in the US MIC and guess what? Not only did they invent the internet, they now reliably control all so called democratic and capitalist systems. Is this really some kind of surprise? What did you think might occur? Welcome to a unipolar world, or as it is otherwise known, a New American Century.

No welcome to the apocalypse.

Seems breddy hopeful to me either way.

That's because you don't have to do any of the work.

Terminal misunderstanding of Russian psychology right here. Die slow.

And work is evil because?

..I'm lost now.

I need bed.

If you think that my characterization of western democracies as a bunch of 12 year olds is anything other than generous, you are sadly mistaken. This has nothing to do with Russia per se.

As if Russian psychology were a thing.
Heh.
Heh heh!

MWUHAHAHAHAHA!!!

cnn.com/2017/04/06/middleeast/syria-idlib-chemical-attack/

And if you don't think that was a challenge you miss the point, it's all about posturing. The bombing was just posturing, these tweets and texts are diplomatic business now, he might not have bombed if it wasn't for that text and that CNN headline

Don't tell me you actually think meme magic is real. Sitting at home posting poorly drawn frogs doesn't accomplish anything.

This guy knows what we need. Spencer did good, having our own antiwar rallies and marches will do us, Syria, and our countries a lot of good.

But you just proved yourself wrong because all your examples are against a war in Syria…


In a way it is, but I don't think it's the primary motivation. I think the primary reason he did it is because the globalists have him in a pincer movement between Democrats, Neocons, and the Media. He knows it's a false flag meant to start a war in Syria, but he couldn't get out of responding to it, they checkmated him. If he came out and repeated Russia's narrative about the event it would "prove" that he's a Russian agent, and impeachment would commence. So I think he's trying to deflate their leverage against him through this half-assed symbolic measure, so that further calls for escalating war will sound crazy and Trump will seem like the cool-headed smart leader by not escalating into a full war.

It's a very risky move though and there's many ways it could go wrong, but I think it was probably the only move he could make given the situation he was in. We can't forget that this is essentially a cold civil war, and in any war you're going to lose some battles and lose some ground to the enemy. And sometimes you have to retreat to avoid even worse losses. But that's okay if you eventually win the war.

And I think we can help him win that war by continuing to use meme magic to sway public opinion away from escalating the war. Trump is looking for any excuse he can find to avoid war without looking like a Russian agent to the Democrats or an Obama-like weak leader to the Republicans. So let's try to give him that excuse by exposing the false flag and telling everyone why an escalated war would be a massive mistake.

CHECK DUBS

Better keep #SyriaHoax trending then…

I'm assuming Pompeo isn't much of an ideologue (like previous director) and will just stick to intelligence gathering (their actual job).

'Fake' gas attack answered by 'fake' missile strike.
Retarded libshits assume this means Trump is their man but still a Russian asset.
Trump loyalists not realizing the retaliation was bullshit are questioning their position.
Syria using the opportunity to make itself look good.
Warmongering factions have reason to be more open and brazen.
China has realized they've played their whole hand while the ZOG was bluffing that it didn't even have a high card.
Western ZOGs moving to appease the increasingly angry mobs of native Whites while simultaneously compounding the severity of the eventual collapse.
Internal US factions in full conflict. Appears no agency holds a single homogeneous position/allegiance.
Kool-aid sales fluctuating wildly.

Getting any more specific without insider info is not probable in such a fluid situation.

The stench, of the CIA.