Jews and Jesus

Eh, yeah, it does look aquiline, but damn it's a big ol' schnozz. I have a Dutch nose, myself.

The hell? Does someone have a picture of noses and what they are or something? I guess I have a Latvian nose because that's what I am?

Depends on whether or not his head extends up into that headgear, like a beanie, or if it's sitting as an empty dome atop.

It's as complicated as genetics when you get down to it, but here's a rough list.

Thanks that's pretty clear.

I think christcucks just need to accept that rabbi yeshua was a jew and there are no good jews. Everything yeshua did was a bid to make himself big amongst jews; out-jewing jews by reminding them of the shit they do and then claiming he would totally not do that, wrecking jew temples, claiming to be the (((messiah))). The biggest hole in this is that OP's theory that came from an AOL article is based on this:

Even christcucks like to repeat on Holla Forums ad nauseum that yeshua was against other jews, meaning that other jews were his other target. In effect, he didn't care much for Rome. Even going by the (((bible))) the jews at his trial were what got him executed and the romans were just doing their job. Do you seriously and inadvertently imply he wanted revenge against a bunch of romans for doing their job? So christ-like. So kingly. Even so that must be the case because the catholic creed or whatever constantly mentions the name of the roman guy who carried out his trial. How very jewish to be that vindictive.

I don't even know what you mean by this. I don't even think you know what you mean by this.

if jesus was an actual king who opposed rome, the story of jesus in scripture is false, at least partly.

I refuse to believe our Lord looks like an Easter Island statue with pigtails.

Old school jew slur.

lul

Sounds like bullshit.

Before even reading the descriptions in the image I found the Jew. I feel some strange pride at that.

...

...

The "bible" has had more rewrites than a controversial wiki entry.

The Romans would have been more than happy to brag about killing a foreign king.

This is bullshit

I'm not seeing it. It could be just a fancy hat.
What a BS theory

The council was so powerful they altered everyone else's texts about him?
I'm not trying to attack Jesus, he's just alright with me, but c'mon man, he wasn't a warlord.

Is there some trace of this being a depiction of a "crown of thorns" or is this guy just confirming things to fit his theory and sell his book?

And if his theory is correct, it would seem to confirm that all recognizable forms of "Christianity" are based on a Semitic cult which hijacked a separate religious narrative(s) to create a subversive force against the Roman Empire.

its to sell books …. If there is one person (((they))) lie about more than Hitler its Jesus.

Have you ever questioned why articles and documentaries like these always spring up around Easter and Christmas time? It's the irreligious trying to make a quick buck because apostasy and heresy sell. None of these claims ever stand up to serious examination, whether Jesus is claimed to really be Julius Caesar or Caesarion or this person or that person, none of it, no matter how many years in a row they propagate the idea (and never with the same alternative identity, which goes to show the absolute lack of consistency in the claim) it never pans out under serious scrutiny.

...

I'm not buying this.

Christcucks go crucify yourselves.

welp trips dont lie. nothing to see here folks. shows over.

From my research there are three possibilities regarding Jesus:

If he was real, he was a damn good shitposter.
Kikes are still butthurt about his bantz to this day.

true. but with kikes its rarely as it seems…

This is so thin I'm curious if it's someone pushing an agenda, or if it's just clickbait. What do we know about the writer and publishers?

Found the D&C shill.

i dont like jews

Fair enough.
The butthurt does seem to go above and beyond standard kvetching, though.
Maybe there's something about him that rustles their jimmies that isn't the public reasons they give.

but jews are our greatest ally

dubs dont lie. this requires further investigation

Starting a nearly planetary movement that strips them of their divine specialness seems like a pretty good reason on its own.

Yea, I can't see how that would get under their skin. It'd be interesting to hear what their mystics have to say about the metaphysical implications of that, though.

This "historian" got the idea that an unclear something depicted on a coin is a crown of thorns. It's fucking nothing and OP jumped on it like he usually jumps on a nigger cock.
I bet it's the usual: a "scientist" makes a newsworthy claim to get shekels.

this is the most retarded shit i ever read. king who?

in other news, Hitler was actually a famous Italian opera singer

Their official stance was that he was a sorcerer and liar who was hung by a Jewish council (not crucified by Romans) for witchcraft, and his eternal punishment is to be boiled in semen forever in hell. Therefore the kikes are still the Chosen and everything past that is heresy. Officially, they're still waiting for their Messiah, because Jesus wasn't him.

They're not subtle among themselves.

What do you count as evidence? The existence of Jesus is millions of times more likely than the existence of Aristotle or Socrates or Atilla the Hun or or any other historical figure

Uhh how about the endless metric fuckton of physical culture including manuscrips, monuments, and art in the years after his death?

truly idiocy. the funnies thing is that so called "intelligent scientists" are the most retarded, contradictory, hypocritical people on the face of the earth

Isn't there something in their doctrine about how god can act on the world entirely of his own volition (I guess what we'd call Special Providence), but also the power can be utilized by a group of people who know how to use it?

Biggest "we wuz kangs" ever.

The Jews today are not the Jews of the Old Testament. Aside from just looking at them, its easy to tell. I don't need to take you through any convuluted "intellectual" nonsense. The religion of modern Judaism has nothing in common with the religion of the Old Testament (which was NEVER called "Judaism"; Judah was ONE tribe in religious confederation of ancient Israel). Jews do not follow ANY of the doctrine of the Old Testament except for the superficial crap, which is exactly what God said he HATED in Isaiah CHAPTER 1.

Solomon's Key is literally a spellbook for demon sealing, allegedly taught to King Solomon by God Himself. You'll probably recognize a bunch of demon names in it if you play any volume of fantasy-themed videogames. We're actually digging up evidence of demon-sealing being a regular practice among some Jews, going so far as to include rituals in the foundations of their homes.

haaretz .com/life/.premium-1.778024

Also this .

I'm not aware of a single race that hasn't tried to claim Jesus was one of their own. Even the Japanese.

the jews of today are exactly the same as the narcissic, lying semites who wrote the old testament.
Putting that group of obvious kikes on a pedastal as God's original chosen people and worshipping their past instead of your own is pathetic

jesus is the jewish stick zombie

I'd sure like to see how you calculate those odds.

Sorry, I have to give a short rant about this.
While 'stick zombie' isn't a bad meme in and of itself, from a purely jargon standpoint, not all returns from death produce zombies. Zombies are a subset of resurrections. The fucked-up subset. I must confess I don't know the word for 'being-brought-back-without-error-that-resumes-normal-living', but it seems like there should be a word for that to distinguish the concept from the concept of zombies.

The only coherent post ITT

It's called resurrection.

but it's confusing to use the name of the set itself as a name for one of the subsets.

Revivification, then? Revitalization?

Huh, that would work.
Thanks user.

...

Revenant? Lich?

Transmogrificated nigger stick jew zombie

Resurrection isn't the set. The set is "raising the dead". Resurrection is the specific case you're talking about.

The main thesis is that the jews descend ultimately from the priestly caste of Heliopolis, from where they emigrated in two waves to Tanis in lower Egypt, where Ellis says is real historical seat of the dual kingdoms of David and Solomon.

After the Balylonian exile they couldn't return to Tanis so they settled in Palestine (Jerusalem) and the priests had to rewrite their history to fit their current situation.

In the period about 1 BC there arose numerous sects of jews of which the sect of Jesus (the Nazarene sect) was one. After the revolt in 67AD the Romans tried to create "simple judaism" to pacify the Jews using an amalgamation of the philosophy of Philo of Alexandria and various myths and symbols from judaism and other religions in the area.

Some industrious Roman politicians (including Josephus Flavius) tried to eradicate the nationalistic judaism because it had destabilized the eastern part of the empire, and thus replace it with chrisitianity, which was peacenik Judaism. Also, the jewish diaspora had to be convinced not to try to retake Jerusalem.

This is the start of the Zionist/Christian dichotomy which we see now playing out it's endgame.

The end goal of Christianity is to "save" the zionist jews and convert all of them, which is why Jews hate christianity so much, - it's an existential threat to their religion and was invented to destroy them.

In the 20th century zionism was ultimately victorious in regaining Jerusalem, and thus we have the same destabilised eastern part of the empire again, as it were.

This is kike nonsense. The jews hate and fear Christ. The Son of God chose the most evil people and offered them Salvation but they betrayed. The very name of Christ offends the jew because it shows the jew his own despicable nature.

What scholars have already classified all this?
It'd be so much easier to at least partially use an already existing naming scheme.

He doesn't even really come back to life in the myth, he just teleports around in his final form to mindbreak some people. The whole "risen" thing doesn't even make sense since his spirit is supposed to be contiguous with the infinite form of Yahweh and therefore never ceased to exist during the three days following the crucifiction.

Wrong. He died as a man and went to hell for three days and nights to atone for our sins. He paid for your sins on the cross (punishment for sin is death and hell). So the price is paid, and salvation is free. Whole point of the "gospel" = good news

I pay my own bills thank you very much.

Non-spoopy skeletor Arch-Lich/God-man who completed the alchemical opus

You mean Gehenna

However, why is it that his single death equates to all of the rest? Consider this: suppose you have persons a, b, and c. Each sins, each will be damned to kill. The only atonment for each is death. However, if one can push off their wickedness onto a single being to bear all the sin (in a counter-alchemy kind of way) it feels like a false equivalence. I.e., before it took 3 lives to atone, now it takes one. (Also, this reminds me of the Angra Manyuu story in Zorastrianism). One could claim that it's because he is initially sinless that his 1 life can equate the 3, however, is there any way to confirm that would be the reason? That is to say, if that rationalization is false, there is a contradiction in the weight of sin.

Mercury is everywhere.

I thought the party line was that he was never a man. He was a being of singular – divine – nature.

This kike's theory isn't even new, he was pushing it on Red Ice years ago.

Isn't it said that one Jewish life is worth billions of goyim? It all works out if you apply some semitic reasoning.

Why is christcuck threads even allowed? Not that they should be banned, but you can get banned for so much other stuff here by comparison.

(((Jesus))) is the biggest e-celeb, as it is. Trump on his Twitter as well, but it's selective bans.

My overall point is not getting why some good threads go away, and then I see this thread…. Hmmm. Yeah lol.

Because banning those cucks would cause a shitstorm the likes of which hasn't been seen since the implementation of IDs and the mods don't really care to deal with that as they also don't really care about improving the board.

You stick out like a sore thumb, lurk moar

Well good point, but that would be funny.

That old stick? Try something new. Better yet, form an argument if you're capable. Christcuck I assume?

Just so you all know, the reason this is getting shilled so hard is because it's hovering stably on the frontpage.

Because the biggest zionist religion in the west and the zionist leader of the west are topics that are important to hash out?

Hash what out? People don't just leave their religion over this stuff, and it just divides us.

Jewish religion would include Christianity, as Jesus is the "Messiah". But again, no minds will change over this shit is my point.

daniel radcliffe is a jew

That's true. Still, people refrain from joining cults everyday and I like to think people speaking out against them has something to do with that. In essence, it's more for the fence-sitters than the zealots.

We're pretty divided already. Fighting is good as far as I'm concerned, keeps things going and evolving. Socialists are usually the ones who think compromise and unification is paramount.

The Anthropos is a near universal archetype.

This board is trash because of cucks like you antagonizing anyone you don't like as if you're a butthurt child who didn't get his way. Stop blaming it all on the mods even if they're the worst mods on the site.

Yes, it's more common than you would suspect.

lel

Never heard of this guy before.

I just wonder why this must be the place for it? Is it needed here? And as to the usefulness of allowing threads to push Christianity when we see other sometimes more useful threads go away.

Not unification, but rather allowing topics that are meaningful than pushing Christ on others. We simply need not fight such a battle here imo.

No one would decry antagonizing a self-admitted kike and such a poster would get a ban if a mod is online, so what exactly is the difference with a self-admitted kike worshiper? You're damn right I antagonize any race traitor I see. I don't blame the mods either, their actions make perfect sense, but I'm not going to lie about their motives either.

Well, that's a practical opinion. But as things progress and gets worse and worse for western people, they will all look to movements to dedicate their lives to in the hope of a better life. You must remember that christianity isn't gone by a longshot and is going to be a power player in the coming battle for peoples minds.

That's why I think it's better to have it pre-shilled and discussed here. I've never really bought the "thread sliding" thing as an argument on the whole. Most threads on Holla Forums these days are shit.

Also I think it livens things up a bit. Zealots are more fun to argue with than the wishy-washy in my opinion.

...

There are other things I would rather be on their minds, and to see this place as a means of such discussion.

Some clearly are worse than others, and that is my point.

Overall I think seeing people bitch about an e-celeb who is speaking in our favor on a beneficial subject, only to see the thread get banned, is disturbing when a thread about Christianity just pops up and stays.

Some politicians are also no better than celebs themselves. Nothing seems balanced or wise in terms of moderation, even Trump's tweets are under e-celeb status if all things were balanced. Nothing fits.

...

Ok, but I think there's a bit of a difference of importance about what some attention whore's fancy is this week and a zionist machine that reaches billions of people every day with their subversion.

I make it mean what I want it to, as a means of comparing the two.

Took the shill a whole 6 posts to out himself as Jewish.

That's the problem, it takes wisdom from a moderator to know when a topic is useful to us, and weigh that versus any intent of the person seeking attention. Sometimes, the baby is tossed away, and we end up fighting over a kike on a stick (sorry christfags). Do you understand?

...

WEW

Not an argument.

Just report and hide, user, he's either an enlightened fedora or a kike here to D&C. It's like arguing whether water is wet.

You must think you're really clever, thinking anyone would fall into this trap.

checked and saluted

Okay? Good for you!

neither crackpot theories nor well-reasoned arguments will change anything

that's not a roman nose, it's perfectly straight.

disinfo from red ice. I'm shocked.

If you honestly believe this shit, you're as retarded as the anarco-commies.

Get Out!

This is ridiculous, the Romans and Greeks could tell you who took a shit when the Jesus thing is well late in the day but he could be some other Jewish trick.
Fuck the whole lot of the Abrahmic shit in the ditch and back to being Europeans.

As a rule, all of these theories about Jesus being something other than a Jewish carpenter are stupid and wrong. The (((Synoptic Gospels))) are books which were derived from the earliest known source material about Jesus. While things have been added and extrapolated on occasion, it's still basically the most reliable source on his life.

I only believe in Kek, but the Jews are 200% behind discrediting Christianity. They know that ex-Christians have a high chance of evolving into SJWs.

Jesus is a SPIRITUAL being that took a flesh form to interact with mankind and die afterwards, to come back later in the Second Coming. But kikes rejected this and kept with traditions and wrote the Talmud later on.

And how their expectations where divinely crushed
Worth 2k years of salt
Note that the kikes are still waiting for their real Messiahs to come what could probibly go wrong ?, since they reject Jesus and dont believe in a SECOND Coming.