Libtards decided to make another petition, this time going after Melania and Barron...

We were always the real "feminists."

(checked)

Those digits seem to like the idea.

(checked)

There are many repeating digits here all of a sudden.

...

...

Good thing is, this can lead to a Trump security takeover of the SS.

You object to this why? She's electing to do this, so with Trump billions, they can do as they please, no reason to do it on the tax payer dime.

Jesus. Libshits really don't have any morality.

Fuck off moshie. I'm a-okay with my tax payer money going towards SS detail for our Commander-in-Chief's dependents. It's just goddamn American, but you wouldn't know, what with posting from Tel Aviv and everything.

We must secure the existance of our people and a future for white children.

this is the leftist tit for tat bullshit. They didn't care when king nigger killed shitskins once bush was out, or that michael ran around on the taxpayers dime. No more cuckservative "do the right thing even if the left doesn't" bullshit

Pfffffffffffffthahahahahahahahahahahaha.

Why the fuck should we pay for her though?

I wasn't going to say anything, I allowed Trump pour his "top men" in good positions, I allowed Trump to run his business from the White House, I allowed Trump to blow up smoke to distract the masses while he did his deals, I allowed Trump to back down on some of his promises… but do you know how many poor white families can be helped with the money wasted on that woman?

I wanted to get back at dems, but now Trump's actions are getting terrifyingly near the things I cherish. Last few weeks we were terrified at Trump succeeding on his healthcare bill because were were going to be affected. Now, we're terrified that he might get his way with slashing benefits for poor families like stamps. RAISING CHILDREN COSTS MONEY! With the money that Ivanka back in NYC is wasting, we could expand the money poor families get rather than slashing the funds.

Are you retarded? The actions presidents during their tenure can make a lone wolf go allahu ackbar on them

I hope he hasn't back down from that, it would give dems ammo.

Where is the legal basis for this?
IS IT ONLY THEIR FEELINGS?
Because that won't work or at least shouldn't be permitted to.

Guys! Guys! I found one!

Someone get the rope!

Get your supervisor, I need to report a dissatisfaction with your shilling.

you people truly are npcs

Here's your (you).

We always were, double dubs. Most of us realize a happy woman is a wife and mother, not an HR exec at some shitty NGO.

The only portion of that pasta you forgot was this

All the poor families who actually get the aid are niggers and spics. "raising children costs money", you still don't get it faggot - we want a world WORTH raising children in. No more gibs, for anyone.

I will never stop autistically posting this image until you fuckers learn to compress images properly

you mean this one

...

No.

...

we protect our leaders and their families from dumbfucks like you.

Daily reminder that there's a reason why the elite REALLY want Barron in Washington instead of a highly guarded skyscraper.

Every one of the four families he listed do deserve to die, though. They are all globalist swine.

You are anti-white.

I will kill this """"""""""""""""""""man"""""""""""""""""""" with my own two hands.

Riiiiiiiiight.

I saw the German article about this on welt.de before seeing this thread
current talking points by the anti trump commentors who comment from morning till early evening are
-Trump and Melania now have a dysfunctional marriage
-Obama's presidency cost only 90 million dollars according to (((Judical Watch)))
-Trump pockets a large part of the sum because it's his hotel

also, how fucking devious can these anti Trumpers be? they start getting violent and put out threats all the time and then they have the gall to make a petition bitching about the cost of his and his family's security detail?

Remember when the media said hands of to Chelsea Clinton or Obama's spawn? That they should leave presidential children alone? Fucking rats can't even keep their bullshit straight.

Of course we are. Only National Socialists truly love our women.

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

This may sound stupid, but I can't imagine ever wanting daughters, I want a horde of sons who got out and bring women into our clan. Daughters would be a liability, and only good for giving to other guys for strategic alliance purposes, which is pointless if I don't have sons to carry on the family.

Patriarchy is like the holocaust, it didn't happen but it should.

What you want is irrelevant. What matters is what you get and how you respond to the circumstances you find yourself in.

their attacks against trump are not succeeding, so now they go after his family.

fucking despicable, the lot of them.
these are the tactics of cowards and snakes.

Communists see all as equal. That means everyone is free game. Down to the last child. Remember they slaughtered small children brutally for association with the Russian monarchy.

I get that, I just can't find anything useful in your image though it might just be me, one of the most bizzare things about /monster/ are the daughterus, not the rest of it. I obviously wouldn't wish daughters ill, but really all I would want out of them is what I want out of any women, to grow up and be decent mothers. And since they don't prove themselves except by the end of their lives, even old women can ruin families on a whim, I will never know anyway.

What pops into my head is, 'quit calling me sexist, I'll prove you wrong.' Their theories are wrong, but when has arguing theory ever helped against leftists? Winning is all that matters, and being strong firm men who don't elevate women hell, the guy is literally elevating the little girl who is the center of the photo would probably win more women.

Wanting that is wanting what is best for them. That's the correct attitude any man should have toward women, so you're in the right.

What really bothers me is people on Holla Forums who buy into the false gender equality thesis of feminism by hating women for failing to live up to male standards. Hating women for being frail and physically incompetent, hating women for being emotional, etc. Their anger is misdirected, they should be upset at feminism itself and the jews/dykes who perpetuate it, not the women who are victims of it. Hating a woman for believing the feminist lies she's been told without contradiction her entire life is counterproductive, particularly since we know that women, unlike men, are emotionally driven illogical followers. Expecting them to be logical is expecting them to act like men, which is buying into the false gender equality myth. I hate that.

Fucking nigger-spic-gypsy-kike faggots, all of them.

She wouldn't even need Secret Service if not for libshit crazies and niggers though.

I'm not sure that is the reason some hate them. A male standard is bravery, and yet almost no one dislikes women for not having that value. Calling a woman a coward is rare and neither men nor women would see it as applicable. And just because they are in some ways victims, like dogs who never had good owners, doesn't mean a person who hates wild dogs is doing so unfairly, though that kind of hate is more just a reaction, and not logically based. And even though a dog may not have agency, they still have to be given responsibility for their actions in some ways as a means of improving their behaviour. And even good owners sometimes have bad dogs (top level dykes/jew/feminists)

I'm not really disagreeing, just not sure how to put all this.

Libs saying a child doesn't deserve education? Perhaps if they weren't liberal arts majors they would recognize their folly.

I think the real reason many people on Holla Forums hate women is because they've failed with women. Probably because they expect women to meet a high bar but fail to recognize that they too must improve themselves by overcoming their own social or health issues. It's a two way street, the few good women out there would rather have a nice conservative christian Chad rather than a obese NEET. But they rationalize their hatred by talking about how women fail to meet male standards.

low blow.
but jesus this makes me uneasy. if ivanka and barron lose their security detail, i worry that they could be hurt or killed by [insert govt-funded rad-left group here]. the fact that this petition is gaining so much traction makes me think that it may be a part of a larger plot.

if anyones secret service protection should be taken away (to save tax dollars? what a fucking joke) its the previous presidents and their families. if obama can hang out in french polynesia with a bunch of cianiggers following him everywhere (for the rest of time), then i would think its justifiable for the current first lady to have the same protection while she is in NYC. just imagine how many people in that city would love to harm her or barron. these people are sick. i cant believe they would put a woman and a child in harms way, and for what? to save on spending? since when does the left ever give a flying fuck about budgeting? they all want 15$/hr for their mcjobs, and free healthcare for non-citizens.

you wanna fix the economy? how about we audit the federal reserve? oh wait… trumps actually doing it. better protest it.

the true irony is that change.org and all of its followers are all probably occupymovement morons. you wanna destroy the 1%? well then where is the petition to audit the fed?

They won't. It's ridiculous bullshit that won't happen. These dumbass leftists are just grasping for straws, there is zero chance of them getting their way.

...

The standards most of us have are something like
-genetically compatible
-not degenerate (at least not more so than us)
-wants children or can be convinced (ties into degenerate)
-not overly likely to divorce rape you (didn't have a single mom, not divorced, not a huge slut, etc) but this ties into degenerate as well

I don't know what a high bar would be exactly but that isn't it. I admire women based on their quality of mothering and loyalty to family and husband, and I despise the cunty ones who are shit mothers even if beyond their control or are man-haters. I know where I have failed and succeeded with women, and it has nothing to do with the those. I can't speak for others, but if I had to guess, you are confusing bitterness with hatred.

I'd say in today's society that standard is a "high bar" simply by virtue of a minority of women meeting it. I'd also say you're missing "not a hamplanet", though I suppose that could be rolled into "not degenerate".

The sort of women who meet this bar are good Christian girls, and they tend to get married off pretty early on. If you want a woman like this, you need to be prepared to make yourself better than the conservative christian chads that normally scoop them up or the local business owner types who get them as trophy wives. That means you need reasonable physical fitness, reasonable social skills and community involvement (go to church), reasonable financial security for both you and her, need to be presentable to her family, etc. These are all things that can be improved through hard work.

Hamplanets are genetic problems, I would say.

I know my problem with women, and being more chad chad is thundercock, not betabux like you are describing wouldn't help. I grew up in rural christian country, they are just as likely to go off the rails as others, they just tend to not be turbosluts at a young age.

This hasn't worked in 50 years unless you come from a family like that and marry your childhood sweetheart or have something arranged.