Sup Holla Forums Is this true?

Sup Holla Forums Is this true?
I can not believe it but google it and I did not find much information that would help me. redpillme plz

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.is/G3ZCD
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Of course not. Where did you get that bullshit? Snopes?

Cleetus please go

Got something against Romans, boy?

Lowering a deficit doesn't mean jack shit in the long run if you drown the nation in debt while doing it.

Deficit and debt are different things. Let me see if I understood, if Obama received a debt of 6.3 trillion and after 8 years only increased 0.2 trillion? If my calculations are not bad that's just 3.07%
Wow, that's amazing.

No one here cares about fiscal conservatism, it's a non-issue compared to immigration

Does it make sense to increase the amount of food stamps and other welfare use other than try to reduce the number?

Because nobody gives a shit about deficits? You can make a deficit disappear by cranking taxes up to match and its reasonably acceptable to run a deficit in an emergency, what matters in economics is the long term which is what national debt is about.

...

It doesn't mention slick willey's gutting of social security to "balance the budget".
freedomworks.org/content/clinton%E2%80%99s-3-trillion-raid-social-security
archive.is/G3ZCD

Basically all they managed was to make the right people rich to give the impression of a healthy economy (a good idea to stimulate an economy i will concede but they did nothing to build a future for the people, nothing)

Don't forget that while they say unemployment has improved they always forget to mention the rate of underemployment and unreported numbers Like those not searching skyrocketing

Oh yeah OP, Obama sure has been great for US debt!
This graph even gives him some slack in accounting for how a larger economy can carry a larger debt burden. The Obama years were a debt shitshow even taking that into account.
saged for low quality thread

Yea they literally changed the definition of unemployment

this thread is ass and you should eat my ass because you are my slave nigger

No Obama increased the debt by more than all other presidents combined. The current debt is close to 13 trillion now.

...

Get Out Communist Scum
Oversight and regulatory agencies are a tool of the enemy. They benefit neither business nor consumer, and serve only as yet another mechanism to be corrupted; the authority they wield is arbitrary and unhelpful.
Just look at the proponents of Glass-Steagall: neo-socialist kikes like Stiglitz and Krugman.
Your complaints are Marxian in nature, and can only hurt the Volk in the long run. If you're looking for an enemy to gut, or why the system is rigged, look to the Federal Reserve and not the industry itself.


For fuck's sake, forgot to actually sage.

True. Debt is a useful measurement. Deficit is completely useless because the numbers can be manipulated to suit your argument.


Wrong. The debt increased by $6.5 trillion in Obama's first term.

republicans are fucking garbage

Neocons sure

Lol yes user the volk, however in reality we have a marxist system and it's run by kikes at the fed and kikes at the head of everything it's all corrupt and regulation is manipulation i'm not actually arguing that at all but destroying ops argument from the perspective of the marxist system he is referencing in his post.
Please continue to btfo communists though.

No mate, he added 6.5 trillion to the debt.

Ah, yes the one thing people on Holla Forums despite our differences have in common is the love for fiat money, small weak goverments, Israel and free market globalist policies. To be honest Holla Forums is synonymous with the tea party. We just habour a deep love for rich people and anybody from reddit (you) can join us as long as you don 't insult our Hero Jeb! or my wife's black son in here.

Yes, it is true. But it's very technical, lawyerly kind of true, and it relies a lot on the uneducated (and sadly often the educated) not knowing the difference between "deficit" and "debt."

Honestly I never liked any Republican aside from Trump, especially not that kike Reagan.

Your 1/2 nigger 1/2 jew puppet is no longer president go shill somewhere else.

Republicanism needs to be turned into the American Nationalist Workers party democrats, neo-cohens, jews, other treasonous communists need to go.

I highly doubt trump has already lowered the debt by 7 trillion, user. We're way past 13.

That's just too damn obvious Holla Forums.

Jewt was Speaker back then.

Weu.

Only Commies will look down their noses at and insult the lower classes while pretending to stand for them and their rights above all else.

All modern Communists are petite bourgeoisie.

There are two IRS taxes Federal Tax and FICA. FICA is for social security and used to be in a separate fund, it was a pension fund. Clinton took the money the baby boomers were putting in their pension fund and called them general funds, that is how Clinton reduced the deficit in his term, by raiding the baby boomer's pension fund.

Obama raised the national debt from 12 trillion to 20 trillion. I don't know how anyone can say he did anything but raise the debt more than anyone else did.

We spend three hundred billion dollars on interest on the debt each year. $300,000,000,000 in interest a year.

These people are morons.

Because Republican leaders are lying RINOs.

fuck off you filthy sliding nigger kike

Fucking baby boomers. The majority of food stamp users are poor white families. It's just bad timing to take away shit like that if you don't want white genocide, you stupid fucking cuckservative

You're retard level dumb

Homosexuality is gay

Remember the 7 trillion, neva again!

Most whites who are on food stamps also happen to be either "white" spics, or the retarded leftists that nearly doomed the country by electing Shillary. Let them die.
Also note that the only reason for most Americans on food stamps being "white" is the fact that there's simply more "whites" than any other race. A smaller percentage of "whites" uses food stamps, and even less of those are actually white.

Plenty of whites in rural areas that were and are in dire straits because all the manufacturing jobs got shipped over seas. Gas yourself Shlomo.

If I might clarify for you all:

DEFECIT
means the ANNUAL overage of the federal budget
This would be an example of a $200 defecit.

DEBT
means the TOTAL cost of every defecit COMBINED over time.

Neither of you are wrong. This was part of the concerted effort by Jews and Marxists to destroy the commonwealth of our communities. Once upon a time, if white people were so poorly off that they could not eat, their neighbors and their church would help them.

Those bonds have been dismantled and destroyed over the last eighty years, and the state has stepped in to take their place. Where once the impoverished relied on each other to survive, today they rely on Big Brother to feed them.

There has been a deliberate effort to create a dependency. It is not wrong to advocate destroying that dependency, but it also is not wrong to correctly point out that this will hurt white families in the short term.

In my opinion, the benefits far outweigh the temporary pain. When the Irish immigrants lived in conditions so poor that members of their communities could not even afford to pay for funeral expenses if someone died, they created fraternal organizations like the Knights of Columbus to organize community efforts to help one another. Many of our existing prestigeious organizations of charity today, such as the Red Cross or the Children's Hospital of The King's Daughters, exist because of the hard times of the past that compelled our communities to create them.

White people are low time preference and high commonweal. Our societies are ones where, if you lose a wallet, you can expect to find it in the mail a few days later with everything still in it.

If we cut all foodstamps tomorrow, white people would survive, and not only would we survive, but we would find ways to prosper through the hard times, as we always have.

It is the nonwhites who would have no other recourse.

No, it isn't true. But republicans waste just as much money as democrats, so that much is true.