Jordan Peterson McMaster University Protest

SJW (((puppets))) bang cowbells and protest to shut down Jordan Peterson event at McMaster University.

Importance of this is simple; when SJWs attack the faggot (((Milo))) from the public perspective they have some, albeit unjustified, ground to stand on. When the left attacks Peterson anyone who looks into the situation will be immediately radicalized or at the very least woken up from the leftist pipe dream.

https:// www.youtube.com/watch?v=-1P_1mLlJik

University is using the same tactics used to shut down Holocaust revisionists. "There's overwhelming evidence goys, mountains of evidence goys, there's no biological gender goy, we won't debate you goy because we've already proven this with mountains of evidence goy"

http:// pacbic.mcmaster.ca/documents/FINALstatementreJordanPetersonevent_Mar162017.pdf

Anchor me baby

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/HcEJr8h_yGM
twitter.com/AnonBabble

So, what does Holla Forums think of Peterson anyway?
He certainly isn't redpilled, but his thoughts on evolution and religion or his psychological analysis of sjw types is fucking brilliant.
If you haven't done so yet, check out his interview with Stefan.
youtu.be/HcEJr8h_yGM

I just discovered Peterson a few days ago and had never seen him mentioned on Holla Forums before somehow. Frankly I love listening to his talks/lectures more than any other figure I can bring to mind at the moment, and I think most people here would benefit a lot from listening to him… he mostly talks about postmodernists, leftists, sjws, whatever, but a lot of what he says can for better or for worse be applied to people here as well. I spend more time listening to him than I do here lately and I feel better for it.

The only thing I'd give him flak for is occasionally parroting Holocaust stuff but he prefers to maintain some public exposure so he can spread his message so it's not as if he could express his doubt if he has any. If it makes you feel any better, he occasionally references the book "200 Years Together" which is brought up often here and expresses his wish for it to be translated into English. IMO that's a not-so-subtle clue for those of us who have a clue as to what is contained in the book.

He has worn a frog hat made by an indian, became an honorary tribe member, compared his voice to Kermit the Frog, and said that frogs are wise animals to the indians because they can predict disasters.

He's vehemently and vocally against passing all these anti-hate speech laws in Canada i think he teaches there? as well as caused a bit of a stir for refusing to use students' preferred gender pronouns.
There's a great video of him talking about the meaning of the Pinocchio story that was posted in a webm thread a while back that is pretty fucking great. When it comes to that sort of thing, mythology and such, he is definitely brilliant.
The biggest reason lefties work so hard to shut him up specifically is because every time he has debated one of their own, he has shut their asses down thoroughly. He's worth keeping an eye on, though definitely not completely redpilled.

Could you elaborate on that? Do you mean his remarks about resentment and so on?

I saw that on youtube, breathtaking stuff.

...

Not him, but I agree. Some of his lectures deal with extremism and ideologies and their ideologues. The man thinks of the individual as the highest good roughly speaking.

He is privy to "alt-right" and in one of his protests of a law regarding preferred pronouns. He mentioned that the more SJWs push, the more that the [monsters] will come out of the corners.

Bracketed part is my insertion.


When has he mentioned 200 Years Together? I know he's mentioned Solzhenitsyn's other book the Gulag Archipelago.

So what you're saying is basically we should heed Nietzsches advice on fighting monsters?

I should have been more explicit: I think he was specifically referring to us.

Watching this now, commenting before the lock. Peterson is hugely important, probably the only one in Canadian Academia doing this so visibly.

No doubt that means he's an 'e-celeb' and never to be discussed.

Anyone have the webm? I'm looking on YouTube and all I see is the interview with Dave Ruben, but I don't think that's the one. maybe I'm wrong? it doesn't seem as in depth though, more like a summary

Actually this might be it.

He sees them both as two sides of the same coin, caused by the west "killing god" with science and descending into nihilism.

He's a 54-year old unmarried (((psychoanalyst))). Might be useful, but can't be trusted long-term.

fug first part accidentally cut off

*I've asked him about national socialism and communism in email a few months ago

He absolutely hates both but sees commies in power as the immediate threat that needs to be fought right now.

He doesn't mention it by name but he alludes to his "other book" that has not been translated yet at least once when asked about Solzhenitsyn's antisemitic attitudes. He skirts it very skillfully.


Yes more or less, and to a lesser degree about the nihilistic nature I see here from time to time despite how I know Holla Forums likes to think it is immune to it. It's not everyone but it's certainly represented here.

Yes, that's right. He denounced the attempt at creating a moral axiom, done by fascism and communism in the 20th century.


He'll actually answer emails? I had considered emailing him and having a discussion. Do you think he may have some Jewish blood? There are certain physiognomic traits that remind me of a Jew. I'm off to bed.

Seconding the other guy, will he reliably answer emails? What I wouldn't give to pick his brain

Hold on there. He isn't against science per se, he's against accepting rationalist truth as the only form of truth as people like dawkins do.
His argument is basically that scientific truth is fine, but it's not the only truth. And while scientific truth is only about 400 years old, darwinian trruth goes back for millenia.

He's a clinical psychologist, not a psycho analyst. And as far as I remember he said he has kids. Also, in his interview with reality calls his wife comes in and tells him dinner is ready or something.

Not sure about everyone but I got three replies from him, first two were replies to questions I had with his talks and his book Maps of Meaning, and the third was about twentieth century politics and nihilism.

Took him a long while to respond to each email, dunno if he will at all now.


Well it was an oversimplification. There are plenty of fedoras who treat science like a religion anyway

Peterson has pointed directly at what we see happening today, the death of God that we saw over a century ago has unmoored the men in the west and we teeter between nihilism and totalitarianism without no anchor to hold us from shooting off in either direction. The 20th century is filled with horrors due to this, and it's up to the next generations to solve it, or our culture will collapse and be destroyed finally.

He draws on ancient mythologies, as things that evolved alongside us over hundreds of thousands of years as describing exactly what we are seeing today and their solutions. The ancient peoples described the cycle of humans, tribes, cultures and empires long before we actually understood and could articulate any of it. We need to become fully realised individuals capable of revivifying our father (our culture) and reinstate it with attention and a new sight so it can restore order and balance to our society.
What this means literally I don't quite know, but it's reflected in ancient mythology, and as he points out also in modern examples like the Lion King (very similar to the story of Osiris, Horus, Set and Isis) or Pinocchio.

We have to face the deepest and darkest things both within us and without, and fight and destroy them, save the virgin, find the golden ball, rescue our father, however you put it, and become the prince.

Christianity is important at the very least because it places articulated truth as its highest value. We must always speak the truth as best we can, and if we do things that we cannot speak honestly about, stop doing those things. Truth is the antidote to suffering, and this has been the cornerstone of European civilisation for millenia. Solzhenitsyn's prime reason for the evils within the USSR was that, "everyone lied." Peterson addresses the problems we're facing at their absolute roots, suggests solutions, and does it in an easily digestable way.

His daughter is really good looking too.


He's got some lectures on Nietszche that I've only just started, but he goes into depth on Dostoevsky, Freud, Jung among others.


Pretty sure he's married, he's often fiddling with his wedding ring.

Here is the first video I ever saw of him.
He attempts to keep a straight face while talking to a tranny freak.

I think he's a legend.

He is the next fuck head people will follow. Milo is out, this nobody is in. Who gives a shit about this. It's alike eceleb worship.

He's not wrong. We are monsters by normie standards, but that's what it takes to get anything accomplished in a political environment controlled largely by people who legitimately want us, our families, and our entire race dead or enslaved. It's us or them, and if we compromise, we lose. The normies will learn that eventually.

Darwinian truth is scientific truth.

What do you think of this one, where he talks to a hot tranny? The same hot tranny from the video you posted.

Comparing this guy to Milo, fuck off m8.

The PDF says

kill yourself

What has this person said that people did not already know?

He is very intelligent, but too good-hearted for his own good. His historical analysis is very flawed in relation to national socialism, wich is a pity. I noticed lots of factual mistakes in his lecture about Hitler, foremost that Hitler was elected, wich he was not. His logic and theory are very good, problem is he is basing his thesis on fraudulent material, mostly kosher ideologues who got a living from writing pro-allied propaganda post ww2. If i had to, i would describe him as a "moderate centrist" who just realized commies are taking over, and since he filled his head with propaganda depicting the national socialists as baby-eating monsters, he is trying to warn people that they should stop with the pc lunacy because people are turning into nazis to fight them because they were left no other choice. In a sense he is right, that is what is happening, but he is projecting a fantasy created by kosher literature and perceives the us-to-be murderous maniacs. In fact it really saddens me, the man has a good heart and a brilliant mind, but his view of ww2, and national socialism in particular, is completely erroneous and based on propaganda. His analisys of abstract thinkers and how they operate is also spot-on. All in all, i respect him in that he is trying to do the right thing, but i feel bad for him in that he dosen't notice he is giving a true-to-heart view of a misrepresented side of history, even sadder is that he is portraying as monsters based on propaganda the people who most want to defend honorable people like him from actualy deranged and dangerous individuals and movements.

Pointing out the evolutionary science behind sjws. Sure we kinda knew the stereotypes, but he really puts it in great detail. The evolutionary roots of mythology, religion and moral.
A detailed psychological portrait of marxism and no, it's quite different from what you usually encounter on Holla Forums.
You can autistically screech "e-celeb" all you want, but the guy has interesting ideas.

Stop implying they don't exist. Reasonable trannies exist. You're just hopped up on your permanent, radical views. You are the true ebin alt-right :^).

Seriously, how can you feel so comfortable in your online-exclusive view that trannies, jews, gays, and blacks are permanently tainted? We have Malcolm X, Milo, trannies like this, and reasonable jew researchers like Ogi Ogas, Sam Harris, who all have some shred of logic. And these people influence a larger majority of these minorities than you would expect.

Yes, they all have their character flaws, so does every influencer, don't ignore that.

Anything that isn't biased, or perfect, is cancer to this board lately. Things that aren't perfect are made to look perfect by the bias of people on this board, for example:


"He attempts to keep a straight face while talking to a tranny freak."

This isn't at all what Peterson thinks, he even agrees that he would refer to the aesthetically female appearing tranny later in the program as "she". He also refers to some principles, such as ulterior motives, and how it is presumed when someone looks female that they don't have them.

We have mental illnesses, trannies in particular are troubling, because they're still intelligent enough to go insane and murder someone. But like any illness, it needs to be accepted to some capacity, this is true to Western values. You can't just axe a minority, this too is inherent to Western ideals.

We have to learn to live with these people, you cuck, they will exist. Nazi eugenic ideals are a pipe dream you room dweller. We can talk about that when whites are the first on another planet. You have to out-argue, and intellectually annex.

If you had a relationship with a tranny, how would this taint your views? How would this sway you from your political identity? I can fuck trannies, and still agree with the majority of people on this board.

If I had a dollar for every fucking gender, I'd have $2

kill yourself

wew lad. the 4chon is strong with you

user let me explain, your desire to debate radicals is moot. The people who go to bed dreaming about how they will kill every non-white on the planet with his imaginary armies is beyond reason. These are the footsoldiers of national socialism. They have their uses, but we know, and they do too, they already set their minds to become cannon fodder instead of political officers, so to speak.

As for the other part, relationship with a tranny is pointless, the reason for relationships is that they will culminate into a family and offspring. Dating a tranny is no different than fucking a tree, aside from the fact you can't get aids from a tree.

You're just advocating eugenics if you don't think there is a based person that isn't of your own biased race, community, you groupthinking megafaggot.

...

dubs confirm eugenics is the way forward.

Yeah the baby argument is there, I'm talking about fugging mainly. I agree that it's useless, I just wanted to talk about political views, and how people believe that simply by fucking a tranny, that you will become one, or at least have their ideals.

I do like that analysis though.. footsoldiers. I'll remember that before I get psuedo-triggered next time.

It's a pretty big red flag user

By fucking a tranny you are simply supporting them in their illnes, giving in to their delusion and partaking in homosexuality, regardless if it uses a wig or looks pretty it's still biologicaly male. People who fantasize about national socialist being some sort of utterly pure religious fanatic are also wrong. The national socialists took after the romans in how the viewd the relationship between the individual and the state. As for sexuality, nobody really cares a lot what you do in private, it becomes a concer when you try to transport that into public life. There is a reason Ernst rose up to become leader of a segment of the movement despite his homosexuality.

You're forgetting how easy eugenics against trannies is. They do it themselves.

Trans is mental illness that needs to hold the same stigma as schizophrenia. We ain't getting there by fucking them and placating them.

There is nothing wrong with footsoldiers, that is what their mental capabilities led them, and i'am glad they exist. But it is important for them to understant that they are NOT the political arm of the movement, they are not fit or eloquent to fill that role. Their mentality is aimed towards charging in and shooting the enemy,unlike the radical combatant, the role of the politicaly intelectual members of the movement is acquiring power and legitimay so as that we can give enough support and allowance so that the footsoldiers can do their job. Sadly many are too stupid to understand that, and think they are in a position to speak for national socialsm by simply spouting slogans and catchprhases, and they are not, radicals speaking a a voice of the movement in an arena wich is not prepared yet for radicalization are a detriment, regardless if they think they are right or spot-on. If your truth is not coherent enough to be perceived as so by the public, you will be seen as a lunatic, and will never reach the point at wich you can act your purpose of fighting the enemy.

>look at these stupid goyim radicals.

(checked)
sounds like a splendid idea
your 4chin shows

He is married, and talks about his wife on a number of Jewtube clips.

I don't think I even disagree that it's a sign. But it's this groupthink that causes hell.

I spent a lot of time labelling people based on preconceptions about beliefs, and generalizations such as 'SJW'.

Generalizations like that are useful, they're acronyms. But they stop being useful when you use them as derogatory terms, instead of using them to denote an ideology.

I'm redpilled, but to be free is to be able to fuck trannies, to race mix, to do these outcasting things. It's the job of intellectuals and non-physical forces to prevent these quirks from becoming problems in society. But that is definitley a subjective opinion, it's how I think it should be managed.

If you stand for freedom, you can't say you can't do these outcast things. It is also people's right to oppose it, but in my opinion, not with force.

You have no idea what a paradox it is to be in a relationship with a tranny that has the same redpilled political beliefs as you, no holds barred, yet to remember how you yourself would have viewed that prior to experiencing it. I would have called myself an SJW, or at least believed that I had some views on gender that were objectively incorrect. But no, I'm the same person, the same person who believes tranny welfare is getting out of control, the same person who objects to every mainstream tranny belief. And that goes hand in hand with opposing post modern feminism, and any other ideology attributed to SJWs.

But almost anyone on this board would see me as cancer or opposition, just because of the image of a tranny relationship.

oy veyyyyyyyyyyyyyy

Seriously, fuck off.

The words Nazi, Racist, Bigot shows that you are wrong, as they are very useful to get people to shut up.

...

Why do you cherry pick? Your quote is not what I believe at all. If you just read the sentence after that, designed specifically to help you understand, maybe you wouldn't feel so offended.

Race-mixing is a completely hypocritical position, antthetical to our race as much as to others, and a purely pragmatic approach, race-mixing creates more problems than it could ever solve, hence it should be avoided and shunned to the utmost. As for trannies, if you absolutely must fuck one for whatever reason, do so at your own peril. We won't kill you over it, but don't expect to receive applause either. Spousing ideas that promote traditional roles and then publicaly dating a tranny is completely contradictory.

Well, that's exactly what I'm getting at. The left uses terms to shut people up, just like many from the right would use SJW to attempt to silence. Despite them being useful acronyms to denote an ideology.

Here's your (you)

Jesus, this was such a nice thread until the trannyfucker showed up and had to run his cockholster about how he is "totally redpilled you guys, and I'm in a relationship with a pure qt3.14 aryan waifu, but she's technically a 'he' because 'she's' a tranny, but that's cool, right? Because my tranny is redpilled and LARPs as a 1950s housewife who is also a nazi! Am I cool yet guise?!?!?!"

Jesus, ye gods…

I don't want to live in an authoritarian state that spies on us, and arrests and executes everyone that does anything perceieved as "degenerate." This includes race mixing, fucking trannies, homos, drug abusers, whatever, so we're in agreement there.

But I don't want to live in a culture where those things are either promoted or even accepted, because they are bad, and the consequences are obvious whether you look at it anecdotally or through broad brush statistics. So we shouldn't oppose it through force, because having to do that means we live in a sick culture anyway. It shouldn't need to opposed by force, it shouldn't be a problem in the first place because the culture and the society on the whole should willingly and voluntarily not accept evil, immoral, or damaging behaviours that affect not just the individual but the society on the whole.

So you can fuck your tranny boyfriend, and I agree you shouldn't be arrested or persecuted, but you shouldn't expect acceptance in broader society, because a healthy society would recognise what you are doing as unhealthy and want to keep you away from it and its children, as a means of containing your illness.

That's two people that think I support race mixing now.

I do not, I simply think that freedom = race mixing. To be free is to be able to do these outcast things. But that doesn't mean I support them. Which is exactly why I said:

kill yourself

All you have to do is look at Thailand, it's a part of the world people flock to to have intercourse with trannies. Is this not perfect acceptance that functions without consequence, and dare I say it, prosperity?

Fuck off, he actually named the jew?

This user already pointed out my position. Yes you are free to do so, disgusting as it is. But what needs to be understood is that partaking in such activities must not and will not be seen as objectivey healthy, based on both philosophical analisys as well as medical science.

And on your last point, I suppose what I'm looking for is a sort of colloquial acceptance that I am not an SJW monster, and that perhaps a lot of people in the same situation aren't.

Revivify the father is the simultaneous act of "paying back" what the older generation has given you while redeeming them for their mistakes, realizing they are only human. It is breaking out of the narcissist bubble of our youth and taking up the mantle of responsibility. This is the essential duty of men in a society and it is why the hero cycle includes redemption of the father.

Ideally, the act of parenting and contributing to something greater than yourself (i.e. culture) is a huge gamble. You have no idea if your child will turn out right or if society will be better because of it. Thus, the ancient meme of revivifying the father evolved to instruct young people the importance of honoring their parents, because seeing their children succeed is the only thing parents get out of the deal.

Of course, postmodernists and academia have tried to destroy this meme. What modern leftists are doing is tantamount to cultural genocide because muh blank slate.

On a more personal note, why would you fuck a tranny, user? You're just banging a man who has castrated himself, how the fuck do you even get it up?

he does it for freedom

Anyone believing Peterson has some personal endgame other then helping others to improve themselves is a moron. This is the closest thing to a martyr we will ever get against the left.

...

The tranny phenomena is partialy due to subconcious will. Most tranny have problematic relationships with their mothers, wich tend to be psycopathic or spiteful women. One of the major subconcious reasons that lead a boy to become a trnsexual is an underlying desire to "show mommy how its done". They become transexual to spouse an ideal submissive female , the sort of female that would not have driven daddy away and hence would not have damaged their masculine behavior in the first place.

Are you kidding? This is the least reasonable thing you've said, just because Thailand draws that genuinely degenerate and perverse 0.01% of the world to it, bringing wealth through "tourism," is not proof of anything good. Thailand is a shithole, filled with 20 year old boys who were brainwashed from the age of 4 and had their puberty prevented through chemical castration, and now sell their ass on their filthy streets for a pittance to obese old white men. It's disgusting and miserable, and I can't imagine the STD and suicide rates among those poor kids brought up in that sick world.


There can be redpilled and respectable homos, everyone's a bit fucked up in some way or another. The world is messy and humans are ridiculously so, just don't expect an authoritarian state to understand that.

And don't expect a healthy society to tolerate your weird sexual preferences being public, because no healthy society should or would. And don't expect many people on here willing to take you on as an ally, because we've seen what general acceptance of any weakness leads to, accept a little from women, gays, trannies, minorities and they want more and more until they've destroyed anything. We've seen it happen right in front of us and it won't be our generation or the next that makes the same mistake.

Well I was talking earlier about "Based" jews, as people like to put it when you talk about a credible source outside your own race.

Statistics from porn sites, google, and search engines pertaining to porn sites don't lie, there is a large appetite for trannies, and if we accept that, the answer is common sensical. But we have to accept that, and I'm afraid that most people here have a confirmation bias against it, so it falls on deaf ears when I try to talk about the topic.

It even talks about why women are attracted to textual sexual stimulation, why books like fifty shades of grey are popular particularly with women, and why men seem to like visual stimulus, and women the textual and or novel stimulus.

TL;DR: Trannies are an erotic illusion, one of the largest searches men commit to when looking for porn is "Large Penis", or some other term relating to the penis and its size. Combining female figure with a bulge = erotic stimulation higher than that of a female.

Porn producers use females and put bulges in their panties for a successful business model that attracts men, talked about in this presentation also.

This accepts that a tranny can look and act female, you may not have been exposed to a nice looking tranny before.

Yes the guy's a jew, if you need me to feed a bias of some sort.

Oh boy.

I don't disagree with anything you've said here. I didn't really have an opinion on Thailand, but now you've given me one. Thanks.

Malcolm X was a male prostitute, drug addict, Muslim convert, and said some pretty KANGZ shit. Milo makes a mockery of the right when he talks about gay nigger boyfriends and family values in the same breath. Sam Harris is just your typical slimy Zionist who hijacks right-wing sentiment to try to boost support for Israel, all the while vigorously counter-signalling comparable European racial self-interest.

Stop deluding yourself with liberal bullshit. White people are the only ones who are receptive to the idea of white self-interest. Every other group in the west is overwhelmingly in support of keeping the white guilt gravy train running for as long as possible. We are alone, and even if we weren't: I frankly could not care less about whether non-whites and degenerates "approve" of my people's right to exist.

I want to know literally what it means. Literally. It's always put in metaphors and in the form of vague story.
Which I think is understandable, because everytime young men find themselves having to do it the entire world has changed, and it's not the same as last time, so you can't just write a basic list of what to do in specific order. Peterson points out that line from Alice in Wonderland, "it takes all the running you can do, to keep in the same place. If you want to get somewhere else, you must run at least twice as fast as that." Well we're at the point of having to run twice as fast.

But it's more than just honouring our parents, we have to resurrect and revivify our Gods. The spread of atheism and agnosticism is what's allowed feminism, the breakdown of the family, the corruption in our ruling class, and the mass migration of hostile foreigners into our homes. I don't know if you can push the root of our problems back to the death of our God and the loss of religion. So there needs to be a modern renaissance of theism, which seems so far from happening, and so difficult to even imagine I don't know where it leaves us. Science won't unite us, "liberal democracy" won't unite us, even our racial identity won't unite us, it needs to be something supernatural that exists deep in every individual, but outside of them at the same time. Something that can't be corrupted by the physical world.

I don't know how we get there.

Just out of curiosity, since we are being honest, tell me, are you Jordan, the tranny or one of his students?

I do not mean this as an offense.

If you're thinking of black men, that's not a porn stat, that's pushing content onto viewers, I'm not aware of stats released by porn sites that artificially inflate black men as 'most viewed', or something similar.

Furthermore, this was 2011, the whole black men phenomenon wasn't so prominent. And on top of that, porn site stats aren't the only numbers covered in this presentation, or the underlying study,

They cover web searches, search histories, online personal ads, OkCupid, anonymous shared data of about six million users pertaining to porn in some fashion. They even got PornHub to share internal data.

No. But such a coincidence would be mesmerizing. Synchronicity, eh? In a way, we're all students of Jordan. But no, not a formal one.

Go back to wherever you crawled out from.
Reminder to report and filter

Why should we care what normalfags and degenerates like to watch? We should form what is acceptable based on what gets their dick hard?
Because multi million dollar companies tell us thats the truth? They're doing it just for fun right?

For the love of God, you can say a lot of negative things about Hitchens and his drug abusing subjective morality bullshit.

I don't understand where people get off thinking their particular race's idols are infallible.

It was not coincidence that led you to post here today, it was a concientious effort. I'll ask again, are you the tranny?

(((7c53ea)))

Don't avoid the question, faggot. I'm talking about you personally.
Are you saying the combination of "a female figure" and a dick gets you off?

No, but I have a tranny bf/gf, whatever you prefer, so isn't that reason enough to post? I've been feeling strange about it for long enough, considering my political beliefs, that I thought it'd be a good idea to post, since there hasn't been a Peterson thread for a little while.

it wasn't. gas yourself.

There are no "based" Jews, faggot. I don't believe any of this porn site crap just because someone claims to have studied it.

Transexuals always pop up at the death of empires. Just because it is becoming more prevalent doesn't mean it's a good thing, it's actually a symptom of something terrible.
According to pornhub statistics incest fantasies are also growing, which is the pretty logical result of the infantilisation of the last couple generations of boys.
Cuckoldry is going up, while men become more and more effeminate and masochistic.

These are all symptoms of something broader, don't start pushing it like it's acceptable because it's becoming more common. These are canaries in the coal mine, and should be read as a call to action more than anything. Don't think that because you're a part of a growing minority what you're doing is more OK, it's not, you're one of the ones destroying our culture.

Wasn't meaning to, I was just offering evidence that the insinuation that I'm alone in it is much proven incorrect by that presentation. Yeah, I personally get off on it lad.


Keep calm, you close minded le ebin alt-right footsoldier.

why is anyone responding to this kike?

Fer fuck sake. I put le-ebin. I'm not a lefty you fucking cuck.

>i-i'm one of you goys guys!

You know you could've made a thread about trannys instead of totally derailing this one, son.

lol Peterson is a fucking moderate too. That's hilarious.

If the left speaks, just retaliate the same way. Fuck civil discourse and shiiiet.

Well all I can tell you is that I'm offended by you calling me otherwise. I can't expect everyone to believe my intentions on some increasingly radicalized board. This board really is necessary, just don't gas me lad.

fuck off to 4/pol/

I was on 4 when I was 13. I moved here when it went to shit. I don't know what else to tell you, I wasn't even interested in politics until Brexit. Pure and simple, I'm not your enemy.

I understand what would make you seek confort in a tranny, it is what society leades white men to do, by portraying all other options as incredibly difficult or simply not worth the effort. But you should understand, that is you, yourself fullfilling a biological and psycological need with a "pretend-woman". You seeing dating another male as desirable long-term is a symptom of a sick society, so don't try to normalize it, it only aggravates the problem.

This user explained it on a broader scale


That said, most won't mind if you want to fulfill your sexual desire with a broken male because women have become so deranged and dangerous that it is now a viable option. But don't for a second think that should be normalized, we must ensure that the upcoming generation of females is better suited to their role, not simply give up and indulge in delusions based on sexual desire.

Think of it like this, our race is at war with, for example, islam, wich is actively and openlky trying to breed us out in our own homelands. So why would the state or you as an individual put effort and resources into propping up deviant sexual behavior that is counter-productive to the end-goal of procreation that is the backbone of the state wich ensure a white society will perpetrate itself?

you are the reason 4/pol/ went to shit

Someone ban this fucking tranny loving degenerate ffs,

if you ban him, he wins

Wasn't it shit from the start? What's the obsession with 4chan and its past. I always thought it was shit lad.

That is a terrible approach to solve a problem.

?????????

Banning has the ultimate effect of nothing. Other than confirming what I posted about an increasingly radicalized board. You can't even conceive that someone from your own precious board is developing slightly separate views. And they're not even in disagreement with what you believe, I accepted a few posts ago that what I was doing was degen in some form or another, but that was with an open minded user that was willing to even communicate on the topic.

...

Well from what I can remember, I said I was there when I was 13. That's 6 years ago. All I ever did was post my bussy there.

Your…what?

you are the reason 4/pol/ went to shit

kys

Chanting. Like those students at McMaster University.

Some portion of Holla Forums today is the same that was back on 4chan before the betrayal, and as such they are those who have argued (or at least witnessed arguments) against more or less every ideology under the sun. Traps used to be very popular on 4chan and their right to existence has been utterly shat upon numerous times, not only for the obvious reasons like 'no biological future' and 'mental illness', but also some far great things by anons with a far greater knowledge of biology and neuroscience than myself. So too with libertarianism, communism, democracy, homosexuality, judaism, islam, and so on.

Many people here today are post-GG and post-Trump. These people will have no idea about these arguments. Personally I think old screen-cap threads are the best way to enlighten these newer-Holla Forumsacks, but I've not seen them in a while and I'm pretty sure at one stage mods were deleting/anchoring them. These people will probably have to go through those arguments again, and for them it is bad if we ban imbeciles like the tranny lover.

Mindlessly shutting down your opponent without tearing their arguments apart is not the Holla Forums way. Either provide screen-caps or allow the arguments. Censorship will be the death of us.

(1)

kys shill, Holla Forums is not stormfront and it never will be. We are not an echochamber

Exactly this. I am a tranny lover, and I don't understand why you can't just shit on me.

Jesus Christ user, this isn't your fucking therapy group. I have things in my life that are degenerate and some elements of Holla Forums would disagree with those activities/proclivities, but I damn sure don't go word-vomiting them all over this board in an attempt to garner sympathy or assuage any "weird feelings" I might be having. I suck it up, internalize that shit, work it out for myself, deal with it by myself, stoically and quietly, like a man is supposed to.

Jesus, save the fucking hug-me shit for someplace who gives a fuck about you and your stupid fucking problems.

Sage for adviceposting.

I'm not looking for a hugbox lad, I'm looking for a shitbox, shit on me will you.

BASED PETERSON IS THE CANADIAN HERO WE DON'T DESERVE
GOD SPEED

yes let us embrace tranny-fuckers

nice fetish chaim

And on top of being a trannyfucker, you're also a scat fetishist.

Jew detected…

I don't think I'll ever stop loving this board.

how much do you make hourly?

...

If there's any Glasgow Uni fags on here, make him your next rector.
The power of Kek compels you.

You get banned for starting good threads on here, spreading what is a degenerate fetish born out of porn addiction has no place on here, if you want free speech fuck off somewhere else.

There are pillars of behavior that are not up for debate, racemixing, cock sucking, and degeneracy are not a fucking matter to debate. Now get the fuck out of here you kike.

Nothing right now. I actually left Uni, they injected some feminist bullshit in there, and I couldn't take it. Tbh, just waiting on the next student loan, and hoping I get it based on delay between officially leaving and remaining on course.

I want to use that loan to then start some sort of business, perhaps making nixie tube clocks initially, but something to do with actually creating cool devices from home with simple soldering equipment, then from there expand interests. Uni was a shit show. Though if none of this works out, I would definitely be up for manual labor, it's good for the soul.

You've been shit on enough now m8, now shuttup about your perversions and let the thread return to Peterson or die its death.

Can we stop talking about trannys here for fucks sake?
This was such a nice thread, too.

I love these.

Nigger, this is blogposting at this point. Fuck off.

I do not know how he maintains his sanity, having to debate with these utter space cadets.
How do you not start throwing chairs around when some idiot claims there's no biological difference between males and females?

Did I single-handedly crash this thread with no survivors? How did I do that? Perhaps people are more interested in trannies than I thought.

You have to remember user, wile power resides where men belive it to, much like it dose now, they will never late National Socialism rise. For that shit has to hit the fan, and during times like that power grows out the barrel of a gun.

what is your next strategy to debate against the majority of this board? tell us we're acting like a bunch of nazis or discuss why we should look to Martin Luther Kang & Gandhi as good examples?

Because you can factualy prove them wrong. Throwing chairs and silencing people is the epitome of the admission of stupidity.

There are a bunch of nazis on this board, and it's not even that I disagree with them, I do not, I just think it's a pipe dream, unrealistic, and comedical at this point.

Let's get back on topic of how based Dr Jordan Peterson is.

>>>/4chan/

Peterson threads have begun to attract a lot of shilling and shitposting recently, it's a shame because even on halfchan they were good threads at the very beginning.
Let's just ignore the trannyfucker now, should never have replied to the cunt.

Anyone listen to Harris vs Peterson round 2? Seemed like it boiled down to Peterson pointing out that story, mythology and religion are how we describe truth before we can articulate it, and Harris saying we don't need it to actually be religion for that to work.

did he denounce that because there already are moral axioms? or because he doesn't believe in them?

(checked)

I was using some dramatic licence there, user. What I mean is, it must be incredibly mentally taxing in a position like his, to continually have to face people with such idiotic ideas, not just the biological one I mentioned, all of these foolish ideologues he deals with.

I'm not sure I would have the fortitude to do so.

jej

Should I even bother listening to round 2? I saw it show up in my RSS, but I felt tired upon seeing the title.

...

lies, damn lies and statistics.

Having numbers is one thing, INTERPRETING them is another.

Dispute it then, don't just tell me it's damn lies.

Has someone read his book yet?
I've been thinking of getting a copy, although it's fucking expensive here in europe.

There are nazis and there are national socialists. The people who think Hitler will come to save with a batallion of UFO's and we will clease the planet overnight and everything will be hunky dory are very sad indeed, and laughable. But they are a minority, just very loud. Most natonal socialists understand our current situation and difficulties, and we are working towards overcoming that on the philosophical and political arena. The guys who indulge in pipe dreams about erradicating other races when they are too scared to run for public office in their own town are really not much different than those who think they will stablish a family with a transexual. Both these groups are indulging in fantasies to hide their own mediocrity. A future for white children can be achieved by being politicaly active and achieving success for that goal, not by mental masturbation about how you will personaly eradicate every shitskin on the planet.

it was a better this time, they just avoided the entire disagreement from the first round, and got down to all the stuff they were supposed to talk about without worrying about the disagreement over epistomology.


i think he puts out the .pdf for free

''Be radical, have principles, be absolute, be that which the bourgeoisie calls an extremist: give yourself without counting or calculating, don't accept what they call 'the reality of life' and act in such a way that you won't be accepted by that kind of "life", never abandon the principle of struggle." - Julius Evola

And thisw is why leftism, despite its current power, is being mocked by vast parts of society. It is crumbling now because they decided to throw chairs. If they refuse to give up power after losing the ideological debate openly, then we will have legitimacy and public support to rightfully throw some chairs of our own.

(checked)
Yeah, but I prefer physical copies. More comfy and I can't concentrate when staring at a screen for too long.

I agree, but damn is it expensive, and that's just the soft cover. I can't image what the OG hardcover sells for.
Someone should reprint it. He has stated that he ''over edited' it, but being the modest individual he is, I expect nothing less than sheer brilliance.

hey question. if reddit-spacing is actually bad because its unconducive to reading, like the infographic states, then why does everyone read and reply to reddit-spaced bait? like, reliably.

Listen, I don't think I can establish a family with a transexual.

I could take the immoral route, and use host cells from myself and the tranny, and then use current scientific method to have a baby with both of our genes through a surrogate mother, but I'm not going to do that.

What I'd rather do is just donate sperm, and not raise a child, but have my genes spread. Or perhaps this endeavour was never meant to last, and I'll end up settling with a woman at the end of all this, and this discussion will be moot.

If I am productive, and I am successful, and I am perfectly moral in every other way, can I not satiate my singular emotional desire of being in this relationship? I'm not going to raise a child like this, and perhaps not raising a child in and of itself is the single largest evil here. But if I still manage to spread my genes through sperm donation, isn't that somehow lessening that evil?

You can't make the argument that I'm not continuing my lineage, I just don't have a direct influence on the upbringing of that lineage. And if a father was to die after a mother gave birth, the same would be true. So it's just an imperfect situation, and like one user said, we're all imperfect, messy, and have our own biases, to paraphrase.

this statement may be correct, but the first half of it is a complete red herring. if someone is posting here, they are already disenfranchised, and you know that. that they are, is the reason they went looking for halfchan, and infinity, and any other message board they could find, to speak out and rally the troops. not only are you selling their activity short, you're holding them to an impossible standard.

You can, i was not talking about you specificaly, more about the marxist philosophy behind the arguments of making transexuals into normal housewives.

Perhaps I'm thinking people disagree with me when they don't. Danke user.

Being disenfranchised is not an excuse. Hitler himself was a hobo at some point. Disregard your personal loss and try to bear it as much as you can, learn how to talk, learn how to convince, read, make acquaintances with moraly righteous and if possible, powerfull people. Being down in the gutter is no excuse for a man to live like a rat.

It bothers me that "cuck" now means "person I dislike/disagree with". As with every insult or meme that the eternal normie gets his dirty paws on, it has become worn out and utterly meaningless.

Well I'm definitely willing to apologise for using it like that on a case by case basis, so sorry.

But you don't get to define how words transition and begin to mean different things. I've picked it up, and you can view me as a pleb or normie all you want, I'll consciously keep in mind that there's people like you who are triggered by the new use of the word.

cuck
:^)

He is married. He is pro-Jung, but still uses Freudian terms and tut-tuts the alt-right shrinking into anti-semitism in his youtube comments.
You would think he had read (((Freud)))s low views of gentiles and realised Jung was the only token goy in his group, but philo-semitism is a helluva drug.

He is a net positive, you can't get everything you want. People should press him on the frankfurt school and KMacs books without sperging out abot ZOOOOG

...

He actually mentions this a lot.

...

He was really good on the Joe Rogan podcast. He mentioned Cultural Marxism a lot, talked about the danger of Marxist professors, and advocated to sending people to vocational school over a traditional university.

He looks like he's worth a short watch at least.

Maybe he means stuff we've found necessary for survival. Like inherent distrust towards niggers.

...

With Jews, you lose.

Can you two fuck off to Reddit

even when youre slightly above average intelligence, everyone around you is a moron, so being phd level you probably do nothing but have to speak to other morons for 95% of your waking life

It's not Nietzsche, I forgot who this was from but it was a separate set of philosophy. The summary of it is along the lines of "Make no monster your common foe for a monster you shall create"

I doubt he'll respond satisfactorily. He probably thinks that anti-semitism is a precedent towards group violence, which he is heavily against.

He was once asked a question about Solzhenitsyn's anti-semitism, and he skillfully dodged that by saying that Solzhenitsyn's book about the Jews was not translated in English so he can't form an opinion on the topic.

underrated.


good advice.

absolutely heretical. you are a degenerate faggot who wont darken his soul because you're an idealistic coward. you're the type of faggot that would if put in a morally compromising situation, would stay an observer instead of an actor because you are such a special individual with his individual karma. don't want your utopian ideals to crash around you. your worldview might get shattered. stay a terrified of the real world faggot….without the strength to win. or better yet, kill yourself. there is no room for assfucking degenerates in this world. youre taking up space reserved for beautiful aryan children to grow up in.

I remember back in the day, what made my stance drastically move was seeing the same pozzed Toronto University blockade Warren Farrel's panel.

You misunderstand the term. Darwinian truth is truth that is 'true enough'. It's truth in action – if you do A you probably end up with B. But it's not objective truth.


You can't mathematically prove that the best way to make a car is to give it four wheels. You simply can't sit down with formulas and objective physical truths and math out the optimal car. But a hundred years of trial and error has let us arrive at the Darwinian truth that four wheeled cars are the best cars.

Evolution does the same thing. It doesn't seek to create perfect lifeforms – it just needs lifeforms that are 'good enough'. It readily employs Darwinian truths, that four legged animals are fast and fur protects animals from the elements and green is the best color for photosynthesis, but it can't ever nor will it ever objectively prove anything.

Peterson's main argument is that religion is itself a form of Darwinian truth. It's a truth that if you follow it, it will help you live your life 'good enough'. Religion is something we evolved, something within our brain structure that enables us to live lives which, while not being objectively perfect, are as good as we have collectively been able to figure out.

He's a psychologist, he's trained to listen to crazy shit.

Amazing how the David Irving thread gets anchored but this thread goes unscathed. Really makes me think.

You're as equally degenerate. You're living a Nazi fairytale. Put your words into practice, or else I'll rule the Earth.

i'm reading right now in wiki and others that say he was elected. you got to read some more books, you got nothing on Jordan

I agree. Genuine moderate centrists are rare these days though. There is basically him and Jim Webb, not many more.

Hopefully you will either die of aids or end up hanging yourself.

Stories are memes, they work, they get transmitted and believed, we learn better through example than through explanation because example trigger our visual center and our visual center is what our belief system relies on the most. Marketeers already know this.

you have no argument. you just enjoy the smell of shit on your dick and the feeling of the fecal ooze making its way down your urethra.

You wouldn't do anal with a female?

It's a good feeling to filter a degenerate like you before having to read all your degenerate bullshit.

...

I remember that question, yeah. Solzhenitsyn is a hero of his; I think he would be greatly disappointed if Solzhenitsyn turned out to be anti-semitic but he doesn't know if Solzhenitsyn truly was or if it's just slander by the jewish community because he dared to say anything that could possibly paint them in a negative light. Really the truth is that what 90+% of (((anti-semitism))) is, but he's not redpilled enough to realize that yet. Not being able to read the text in question though, he's realistic enough to know he can't make a statement on whether Solzhenitsyn is or isn't anti-semitic.

you're jewish.

Do you think anal is actually related to scat fetishism? I wonder

Thanks for that, I'll never consider anal again.

Keep in mind that he's Canadian. Realizing and articulating the truth is literally illegal in Canada.

I'll just note that observable physical reality and mathematical models (Kimura) both suggest that evolution is vastly dominated by "devolution" - loss of information necessary for survival. All examples of "experiments that prove evolution" are either that or just differences in expression of existing genes.

Only pre-martital Christians are that degenerate.

for me, it was the lure of the unknown. I'd been with my lady for ~9 years, and we were on a remote nude beach.

was a good time, but have only done it one other time since, and that was 6 years ago.

It is more related to a man's instinct to put his genitals into a woman, oral sex is not "saliva fetishism".

mcmaster is in a kike neighbourhood

ANCHORED

MODS ARE COMPLETE FUCKING FAGGOTS
THIS IS NEWS YOU FUCKING KIKES GOD FUCKING DAMNIT

They know it's news, that's precisely why they anchored it.

It's what the mods call e-celeb cancer, and if you protest too much, you will get banned.

Predictable but still unfortunate. You can argue that the thread was a net gain though even if anchored.

That depends on if you want 8/pol/ to have any influence in main stream society.

It's not from this Holla Forums, these originated, and it was posters on the other Holla Forums that made Peterson famous.

Harris was just saying you don't need it to be a supernatural, metaphysical religion for that to work just the same. Why use Jesus when you can use Superman?

I did like the point that Doestoevsky came before Nietszche though, the abstract story comes before the articulated truth. So perhaps we actually need imagined abstraction before the truth actually presents itself to our consciousness.

this board is fucking dead

what's it mean when it's anchored

Means it doesn't get bumped newfag

Lurk more then come to the same conclusion that this board is run by kike mods then leave.

You made this thread all worth while user.

jordan penis