Globalists BTFO! G-20 Drops Anti-Protectionist Pledge as Trump Stance Goes Global

Finance chiefs of the world’s largest economies set aside a previous pledge to avoid protectionism and signed up to a fudged statement on trade instead, in response to the Trump administration’s call for a rethink of the global order for commerce.

The Group of 20 nations, meeting in Germany on Saturday, said in a communique that they are “working to strengthen the contribution of trade to our economies.” That’s a much pared-down formulation compared with the group’s statement last year, and also omits a promise to “avoid all forms of protectionism.”

In two days of meetings in Baden-Baden, delegates split under the pressure of the new U.S. rhetoric on the balance of global trade, with most favoring a multilateral, rules-based system as currently embodied in the World Trade Organization. The U.S., represented by Steven Mnuchin in his first appearance at an international forum as Treasury Secretary, argued that trade arrangements need to be made fairer, in line with the administration’s claims the U.S. has had a bad deal from the current setup.

The impasse reflects the atmosphere the previous day at the White House, where U.S. President Donald Trump met German Chancellor Angela Merkel and repeated his complaints that his country has been treated “very, very unfairly” in trade arrangements.

“We met at a time when the global economic recovery is progressing,” the official communique stated. “But the pace of growth is still weaker than desirable and downside risks for the global economy remain. We reaffirm our commitment to international economic and financial cooperation.”

While delegates greeted Mnuchin and said that he had been engaged in the process, it wasn’t possible to reconcile the U.S. stance and that of the other members in any substantive way. Officials may continue to seek greater consensus on trade between now and the G-20 leaders summit in Hamburg in July.

The communique also committed to “further strengthening the global financial architecture” and said members support work to finalize the Basel III framework on bank regulations. It dropped a reference to climate change, in the face of resistance from countries including the U.S., China, India and Saudi Arabia.

archive.is/D34iQ

G-20 Drops Anti-Protectionist, So-called 'Free-Trade' & Climate-Change Funding Commitment

This would break with a decade-old tradition among the finance ministers and central bankers of the world's 20 top economies (G20), who over the years have repeatedly rejected protectionism and endorsed free trade.

But the new administration in the United States is considering trade measures to curb imports with a border tax and would not agree to repeat the formulations used by previous G20 communiques, clashing with China and Europe, the officials said.

"Unless there is a last minute miracle, there is no agreement on trade," one official, who declined to be named, told Reuters. "This is not a good outcome of the meeting," a G20 delegate quoted Bundesbank President Jens Weidmann as saying.

The new communique said: “We are working to strengthen the contribution of trade to our economies. We will strive to reduce excessive global imbalances, promote greater inclusiveness and fairness and reduce inequality in our pursuit of economic growth.”

The watered-down commitments on free trade reflected the anti-globalisation mood that Donald Trump has brought to Washington and came in the first G20 meetings between Steven Mnuchin, the new US Treasury Secretary, and his foreign counterparts.

US Treasury Secretary Mnuchin spoke to reporters after the meeting:

MNUCHIN: LOOKING FORWARD TO WORKING CLOSELY W/ G-20 COLLEAGUES
MNUCHIN: CONFIDENT US CAN WORK CONSTRUCTIVELY WITH PARTNERS
MNUCHIN: US BELIEVES IN FREE, BALANCED TRADE
MNUCHIN SAYS WILL LOOK AT TRADE SURPLUSES WITH VIEW TO CORRECT
MNUCHIN SAYS MULTILATERAL AGREEMENTS HAVE VERY IMPORTANT PLACE
MNUCHIN SAYS US WANTS TO RE-EXAMINE TRADE DEALS INCLUDING NAFTA
MNUCHIN: US BELIEVES IN APPROPRIATE REGULATION
MNUCHIN SAYS IMPORTANT BANKS CAN PROVIDE LIQUIDITY IN MARKETS

Reuters also points out another potential win for Trump as the communique will also drop a reference, used by the G20 last year, on the readiness to finance climate change as agreed in Paris in 2015 because of opposition from the United States and Saudi Arabia.

Trump has called global warming a "hoax" concocted by China to hurt U.S. industry and vowed to scrap the Paris climate accord aimed at curbing greenhouse gas emissions.

Trump's administration on Thursday proposed a 31 percent cut to the Environmental Protection Agency's budget as the White House seeks to eliminate climate change programs and trim initiatives to protect air and water quality.

Asked about climate change funding, Mick Mulvaney, Trump's budget director, said on Thursday, "We consider that to be a waste of money."

archive.is/Vq3t5

Anti-protectionism would have been a great idea, if they could have made it consistent.

Wall for me and open borders for thee is not an agreement. It's the lingering cost of having corrupt leaders in the past.

Holy fugg I can hear the screeching yids from here jej.

Exciting. Here comes the mad sprint to look out for self interests now that America is looking out for herself again and will no longer capitulate to global interests. But there is a difference between (((self interest))) and national interest. In time, the white populations of western civilized countries will come to realize this and will have their work cut out for them in separating the two.

Can someone rephrase this in plain English?

G20 is folding under Trump's pressure. But since they're all kikes they'll rebound the moment he stops keeping an eye on them.

...

anti-protectionism in an allwhite world would be kinda nice

I'm not big on the policies against environmentalism but always big on bringing down globalists.

Protectionist policies mean that the nation protects it's factories and own means of production over the importation of foreign goods or workforce. Basically it's good for nationalism, albeit the article is too vague to say how good it is. It may just be posturing by other countries to try and get on Trump's good side.

Yep

Considering 99% of the herd knows nothing about economics, it's comical that yiddish globalists use the term "protectionism" like it's a dirty word.

All it means is defense against kosher dealings i.e. capital flux, market manipulation and a slot machine economy.

White meen are more brutal to each other than anyone else. That is why we are strong. There is a place for conflict.


I think this is good for the environment, as more of the EPA's budget will go toward actual environmental issues, instead of the smoke and mirrors that is "climate change."

lmao you fags are deluded

back to endchan

Reminder not to reply to shills. They don't get paid to change your mind, they get paid to waste your time.

Trump acknowledged openly (((economic))) fuckery, says he's aiming to put an end to it.
Rest of the world drops the masks.

When they decline to be named you can be sure a precious metal is involved.

Wouldn't it be great if Trump backed them into a corner and made a deal to get all of our jew-siphoned gold back? He could go down in history as even greater than Jackson himself, if he did that and put us back on a gold backed currency.

There is only one deal. Confiscation under proceeds of crime followed by execution.

I'm reading europeans medias and apparently there was an African delegation who were hoping for more trade (real trade or camouflaged aid? doesn't really specifiy) with the G20 and got BTFO'd.

...

This Brvder. Come to Holla Forums for fair and balanced shitposts.

Makes me proud to be from the same district as him. He was on fire in the briefings the other days, too.

I like the sound of this.

No it would not be. Free trade is retarded.

Off-topic, but I tried to go there a few times just to see what their arguments were, and there aren't any. They don't discuss news, or happenings, or.. Anything. They barely even discuss politics outside of infighting over minor differences in their communist heroes, let alone actually building logical arguments against nationalism. Most of it's just "What does Holla Forums think of x?" and "HOW CAN WE FIX X" fear mongering threads without substance. The only thing that seems to hold them together is that they all really love arabs and faggots. How the fuck are they the 4th most popular board?

What they mean by dropping "anti-protectionist policy" is that they will not interfere with sovereign nations that choose to control their borders. We will continue to trade with nations, regardless of their existing border policy.

This is a YUGE blow to the globalist kikes.

Also to the EU as well. ;)

True. Nations will be able to protect the interest of their workforces, and not have to worry about new regulations mandating the need to hire 'muh poor refugees' or 'muh immigrants' like the EU has been trying to enforce upon Europe.

This is a win for nationalism and a big blow to communism/globalism/kikery.

those are synonyms

Here's the thing, this so-called "environmentalism" movement by these globalists is just another form of kikery itself. They don't really give a damn about the environment, they just want to tax us for essentially breathing air. To them, its all about suckering the goyim to accept a global carbon tax to fund their globalist unions / bureaucracy. It's helping fund more kikery, plain and simple.

I am glad that this whole facade has been exposed quite frankly. It was never about protecting our environment or curbing pollution.

This. It's the kikes' MO time after time. Conflate two totally separate concepts and pretend they're intertwined so that everyone takes an all-or-none stance instead of making distinctions.

There's nothing wrong with environmentalism in the sense of "hey, we shouldn't bulldoze all of nature's beauty to put up parking lots" or wanting to make sure our cities are smog-infested shitholes like in china. But then there's all the global warming bullshit and carbon taxes and bullshit regulations that serve no purpose other than to fuck over anyone trying to start a business.

Exactly.