TL;DR: What do the goyim use to rally around their genes? Vikings. Okay, so we've got to sell them on the notion that everything admirable and Viking-like is embodied in the current dark-skinned invaders, and that a true white should be proud to be replaced by invaders.
…Oh, wait, we've got to throw some STRONK independent womyn in there too … okay, claim that the women were travelers and migrants just like the Viking raiders…
Other urls found in this thread:
(*kvetching intensifies*)
Ignore the fact that Danes were and are already racially similar to English and came in small numbers goy. Don't point out that between the years 960 and 1960 there were probably less people moving to England that in a single year today. That would be racist.
:^)
The vaginal Jew at work everyone
Everybody hated vikings back then too though…
Except there's a huge differece between muslums and europeans migrating to other european countries and assimilated to those countries and cultures very quickly, while adding to it from their own
OYYYY FUCKING VEY, MUSLUMS ARE LIKE VIKINGS GOYIM
Vs.
Oh yes, very similar.
Of course, but they were respected as capable adversary’s. These modern invaders are utterly pathetic by comparison, Saxon England had a “Viking” problem, modern England has a corrupt anti-native politician problem.
Except vikings were fucking swinging axes at the local population before they got off the boat.
...
...
Anti-native politician problem… I think that has been humanity's problem since forever.
The issue is that the number of Angles, Danes and Saxons who came to Britain was tiny.
They were able to dominate culturally but in terms of genetics they left little evidence of their presence.
Then how do we approach the issue of the Welsh, Irish and Scots?
All of whom are pure native populations derived from Britons, Hibernians and Picts respectively.
Genetic analysis of the populations of the British isles show that we haven't changed much since the last ice age.
...
They are only like vikings in that they rape and pillage where ever they go
I disagree; the monarch’s and emperors of antiquity (and even politicians pre the Great War) may not have been entirely fair on their people but didn’t look to replace them with hostile strangers from other lands. If borders were breached the invaders were fought. This is almost consistent in history and only very recently have things changed.
I'm tired of this user. There's only so much a man can take. What do we do to defeat these snakes?
False equivalency. The Vikings made their own communities instead of squatting in others on the conquered's dole. Which the migrants have not done so, because the government is preventing the people from murdering them all. Something the migrants would not have the means to prevent if it were unleashed on them.
Really makes you think. Is the idea of the migrants being "Viking like" supposed to comfort normalfags? I mean they don't exactly have the best reputation as far as civilised behaviour is concerned.
Vikings pillaged to bring back to their homelands, and wherever they settled they also tended to civilize. It was the Normans (who were descendants of Vikings) that pioneered "knights" (mounted soldiers) in Britain.
Except at least the vikings came out swinging. Yes they might have been barbaric, but you knew what to expect. They didn't infiltrate and act dissimulated and then replace you though fucking birth rates. They fought and pillaged head on.
If these fucking sandniggers had any balls they'd do the same.
I fail to see the point they're trying to make - vikings were barbaric raiders that pillaged their way through England. Sure, it definitely was cool as shit to be the viking, but it sure as hell wasn't cool for the people who were being raided. And now they put here the parallel between migrants being vikings and europe being a rich monastery?
The nordic blood in me is boiling.
...
Lots of vikings were traders, not just raiders.
They fucked up our language too into some bastardized creole mess.
ALL HAIL ANGLISH, THE TRUE DESCENDANT OF ANGLO-SAXON TONGUE
Well, at least they're actually right for once.
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
I wish I could get over 1066 but I can't.
ayyyy lmao
Vikings could actually maintain stable and prosperous societies though, so… they're not comparable to shitskins at all.
Hael! Hael!
They will soon argue that Vikings settled in mud occupied vandalicia (al-andalus for moon splitting goat fuckers) and therefore we have to convert to mudhometanism like the Vikings did.
These leftists are so delusional that if we ever manage to get a national-socialist state they'd compare muslims to NSDAP members.
They didn't think this through too well, did they?
it fits, but in hand to hand combat the true viking would beat the mud viking 9/10 times
Pic related: Western politics in 2020.
Except it's really not.
The same way you kill any snake, you cut off the head. Removing the fangs can also be sufficient.
The Norse invaded in small numbers, and genetic studies show that the English population today is overwhelmingly the same as it was centuries before the Norse invasions.
Although I find the comparison between modern "migrants" and Vikings, who were literal pirates that invaded the region, robbed, raped, and murdered the natives, and tried to conquer them to be apt, just not in the way these cucks intended.
Not to mention that the Vikings were raping and pillaging centuries ago, unlike these fucking savages.
...
God damned kikes
One second they kvetch about how worried they are that Whites are starting to respect the laws of nature again through connecting with their ancestral spiritualism.
The next negroes and shitskins iz vikangz
I'm getting real fed up with this bullshit Holla Forums
The rape thing was to some extent made up by angry cucks, the Norse were the cleanest and most well groomed people of the time, they had tools to clean their ears and bathed once a week on lögardagr "washday", which was rare elsewhere to say the least. It was less rape and more women calling rape afterwards, it probably happened, but it was a part of post war frenzy in England too.
That's the problem.
cuck scholars just admitted they're primative.
No modern European country would let vikings into their country if they came in through a time machine or magic phone booth or something.
And rightfully so, because they'd god damn try to pillage you.
If we wouldn't let the primitive form of our own people in.
Why the fuck would we let a primitive out-group in?
Pic one, anglokike. I can't believe how buttmad you faggots still are even after a thousand years. Kek stay mad lesser whites. The Amalekites will rise again.
...
At least vikings didn't say they deserved what they raided, they just took shit cause they were bad asses and left, not destroy the culture in the land forever.
There were some experiments done with magnets to suppress certain higher mental faculties (problem solving, identifying threats) that resulted in atheist and pro immigration beliefs
science daily.com/releases/2015/10/151014084955.htm
Makes me realise why a guy like James Woods, the highest confirmed IQ celebrity can think and say the things he does.
They came for murder, rape, slaves and gold. The vikings were invaders not immigrants.
So, yeah. Sounds about right.
faggot cuck
MATE FUCKING MEME RESPONSIBLY
I DONT HAVE SHOTGUNS OR 3CM THICK STEEL PLATING ON MY DOOR
Wrong. Don't fall for this meme faggot.
The vikings were not "looking for a better life". The ones raiding, pillaging, conquring, exploring, and sailing already had good lives. They were so good that they could afford armor, weapons, boats and time to train themselves physically for war. They were also probably the more educated and higher class of their society. Do you honestly think mere thieves and barberic savages were able to cause so much fear throughout europe and the coastlines?
Fixed that for you, (((user))).
I meant the comparison was apt given their goals; not that these things constitute "seeking a better life".
Yes. More than once, and not just the vikings.
if if if if if if if if if if if if if if if if if if if, Okie Dokie.
Well forgive me then.
Didn't he vikings kill everyone they came into contact with?
She's wearing her helmet side-ways, she's so cute!
Gehyrest thu, eadwacer?
Uncerne earne hwelp biret wulf to wuda.
That makes very little sense, unless they bred so much that they could fill out all the space they just decimated.
Stop watching talmudvision and go read a fucking book
but honestly what the fuck is admiring about the viking raids besides their seafaring experience? I mean, admiring as in "oh look these admirable vikings, those immigrants are just like them, awesome" what the fuck is this paranoia?
STOP COMPARING MARAUDING INVADERS TO MARAUDING INVADERS
This is like the Pilgrim thing all over again. We don't hear much about Squanto's tribe for a reason people. Those castles built by pic related were not to look pretty.
I mean if you want to be accurate and compare the violent invaders to violent invaders… and not be against the current violent invaders… you confuse me.
So how many shitskins you've killed today? Or are you just larping and shitposting? Post your progress on your removings.
YES! THIS!
Isn't red hair, ability to win wars, and greater than 100 IQ genetic evidence of their presence?
I think it's great and we should give them the same greeting that vikings were given when they showed up.
The seafaring experience was pretty damn impressive. The ships they built were unmatched, and English king tried to compete by building a navy but lost 6 for every viking ship so he gave up.
They were the only ships able to deal with the North Sea and travel to North America ~400 years before Columbus. Mediterranean ships would just get wrecked because they were only designed for calm waters.
They also succeeded in
The only thing they have in common with "refugees" is that they pillaged the areas they invaded.
I also prefer the Ancient Greeks though, because while the vikings were impressive savages, they were still savages.
p.s. "vike" just means to raid, there were plenty of norsemen that were just peaceful traders and farmers
But the Vikings were fucking hated throughout history.
The Irish kicked them out of Dublin the first fucking chance they got.
That was true for the Hersir and Jarls prehaps, but the rest of the men were there to earn a reputation and enough wealth to start a farm back home
1066 mate
1066
and don't you forget it
Hearing old english is like hearing tards speakings.
Considering that the vikings were violent raiders who raped left and right, can't help but agree.
(yes, I know they weren't actually like that, I'm joking)
I agree, vaikangz were absolutely nigger-tier
yeah, the varangians were badass, combined with greco-roman armor and their fighting style they were unstoppable in most battles. But greek fire only? nah, greek ships were bigger and designed for naval battles too while vikings had boats, compared to greeks, vikings got rekt everytiem. They couldn;t even succesfully siege Constantinople when a patriarch was commander of the city, kek
but yeah, comparing migrants to vikings is stupid as fuck, but i wouldn't disagree giving them the welcome we gave to vikings
Halts Maul, Nuttenkasper
Are they gonna start selling us to the Irish as well?
Not really. Vikings immigrated a lot, because people would invite them.
Like the slavs invited them to unite the tribes under Rus, because they needed someone with no personal stake in it, or the Greek who invited them into the Varangian Guard, because they needed foreigners to do some wet work or different mercenary orders, who needed skilled fighters with a clean political background.
There are actually very few instances of vikings invading a place to settle.