Attacks on Police should be a Hate Crime, according to new Texas Bill

archive.fo/XT4ZD
foxnews.com/us/2017/02/25/texas-bill-seeks-to-label-attacks-against-first-responders-as-hate-crime.html

BLUE LIVES MATTER

No this will backfire,never trust these pigs believe me.

this is shit, we do not more 'hate crime' / 'hate speech' bullshit.

can we stop it with the newspeak?

Honestly that's a stupid fucking law. You know it's going to be enforced the wrong way. Attacking the police should be dealt with the same way as attacking any law enforcement officer on duty. Other than that, they're civilians when not working.

Yes goyim, propagate our idea

Good.

BASED TEXAS

These.

Go kill yourselves. You two must be fucking retarded faggot copblockers who support Black Lives Matter.

I love it when kike buzzwords turn against them

Can't these cucks get rid of hate crimes?


>>>/oven/

there's no such thing as a hate crime. fucking retards

It's a good idea in theory, they probably should have just stiffened the penalties for murdering LEO rather than couching it in the cultural marxist language of 'hate crimes'.

"I do not know whether it is to yourself or Mr. Adams I am to give my thanks for the copy of the new constitution. I beg leave through you to place them where due. It will be yet three weeks before I shall receive them from America. There are very good articles in it: and very bad. I do not know which preponderate. What we have lately read in the history of Holland, in the chapter on the Stadtholder, would have sufficed to set me against a Chief magistrate eligible for a long duration, if I had ever been disposed towards one: and what we have always read of the elections of Polish kings should have forever excluded the idea of one continuable for life. Wonderful is the effect of impudent and persevering lying. The British ministry have so long hired their gazetteers to repeat and model into every form lies about our being in anarchy, that the world has at length believed them, the English nation has believed them, the ministers themselves have come to believe them, and what is more wonderful, we have believed them ourselves. Yet where does this anarchy exist? Where did it ever exist, except in the single instance of Massachusets? And can history produce an instance of a rebellion so honourably conducted? I say nothing of it's motives. They were founded in ignorance, not wickedness. God forbid we should ever be 20. years without such a rebellion.[1] The people can not be all, and always, well informed. The part which is wrong will be discontented in proportion to the importance of the facts they misconceive. If they remain quiet under such misconceptions it is a lethargy, the forerunner of death to the public liberty. We have had 13. states independant 11. years. There has been one rebellion. That comes to one rebellion in a century and a half for each state. What country ever existed a century and a half without a rebellion? And what country can preserve it's liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon and pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is it's natural manure. Our Convention has been too much impressed by the insurrection of Massachusets: and in the spur of the moment they are setting up a kite to keep the hen yard in order. I hope in god this article will be rectified before the new constitution is accepted."

- Thomas Jefferson to William Stephens Smith, Paris, 13 Nov. 1787

The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is it's natural manure.

and those tyrants, their hands and feet, and fists, they are the Police.

Sure thing Tyrone.

you're either a JEW sitting on a pile of shekels, or a cop protecting a JEW sitting on a pile of shekels.

Go fuck yourself hero worshiper, I am neither a jew or a cop and white, nor a criminal, it's the fucking facts cops pulls little old ladies over and fucking interfere in every aspect of peoples lives.

Ayy yo nigga fuck dem pigs nigga *smacks lips* raysis ass pohlees always trying to keep a nigga down shieeet dey beat up ol ladies nigga

awwwww you're little picture hurt my feelings… I get it now, you're a young girl and daddy is a cop….. awwwww poor little princess

Why? Isn't it basically game over if you even attempt to harm a cop? I would have figured attacking a cop has a greater penalty than a hate crime.

Because every round a cop fires needs a 1488 word essay on why you fired the gun on a dindu who was going to book club meeting @ 2 AM in a district where whites live.

...

Yes, "hate crimes" are bullshit. But this is exactly what needs to happen with all of this bullshit: it must be turned around and used AGAINST those who started it. Every time.

Making it a hate crime is retarded. That being said last I checked killing a police officer was a crime punishable by death.

Niggers, Antifa, beaners, gangs, cartels, they all target police whether individual officers have wronged them or not. They're also perfectly happy to gun down non-white cops, even though white cops are obviously their main targets. Meanwhile, niggers riot and burn down cities when a cop shoots a dindu with a gun instead of letting himself get shot because defending himself would be racist. I like this if for no other reason than the people most assmad about it would be the same people we all hate anyway.

You realize the SS was a paramilitary police force right? Go back to ANCAPistan

Maybe if old ladies weren't shit drivers they wouldn't get pulled over.

The father advocating it is a shitskin.

This is incredibly fucking retarded. Really, attacks on police becoming a hate crime before attacks on whites does? This is why cops are fucking garbage, they put more value on their status as police than on their Aryan race

Penalties for cop-killing are already harsher. The answer is not to provide a deterrent with penalties using the catch-all 'hate crime' bullshit (which effectively makes the cops life worth as much as gangnigger's in law) but to purge the racial and social degeneracy behind the reasons cops are getting killed.
BUILD THE WALL, DEPORT THEM ALL

You mean 'elite special force'? Would you call Seal Team 6 'paramilitary'?

When will attacks on Whites be a hatecrime?

The SS wasn't a "Special Forces" group, it was a group of paramilitary enforcers who swore a blood oath to be loyal to Adolf Hitler and National Socialism. In peacetime they would be the ones arresting those who plot against the Fuhrer, they just had to be a military unit during total war, so their history and purposes appears skewed compared to what the SS was actually meant to be.

They were better trained and better equipped but that's because they were literal Ubermensch.

Okay you're just autistic.

If someone believes themselves to be morally exceptional, above the rest in his service to the community, an enforcer of the law, he should not be protected under hate crime legislation, as naturally, people come to hate what masters make them heel.

Instead, they should face harsher penalties themselves in the cases that police officers have executed, or planted evidence on the people that they were there to either help, or arrest.

I understand Holla Forums wants to be boot lickers, but try and figure this one out. You go out of your way to fight a race war. Cops are called to stop you, they shoot at you. Who are they serving? Not Natsoc, but the system. Try and understand that.

Checked.

Adding more definitions to fit "hate crimes" does not solve the biased enforcement of our laws nor the biased punishments for those breaking the laws.


Never, those are still considered "anti-trump" crimes then the lying jews in the news try to rationalize it by attacking trump or the victim. Just get rid of this anti-white horse shit all together.