Is it bad to rape female bourgeoisie before you kill them?

Yeah don't, you really ought to just outright massacre them, don't stoop to their level of grotesque reactionary slaughter. Those whom will not peacefully yield to a gulag sentence must be cleansed without hesitation, preferably in a civilized manner.

No, not if it's used to keep morale up.

Of course. Rape is always wrong.

yeah man fugging borgisi :DDD

Okay I don't want to sound like an idpol retard but asking "can we rape bourgeoise women" is pretty brocialist.

I detect Holla Forumsack

Get the fuck out of here, Kant.

Nice spooks you got there

Why don't you just rob them then cum in their pussies? Then they'll turn into lumpenproles sucking off the teat of the government and getting payouts for shitting out niggerchildren. (I'm assuming OP is a nigger because this is a nigger-tier plan)

I've been thinking about this, and this is probably the solution to the fermi paradox- any sufficiently technologically advanced civilization will develop technologies that create a dysgenic result. In 500 years the world will be filled with only niggers, hitting rocks with sticks and raping each other.

Killing is wrong ok? Same with rape. Porky has feelings too.

fucking this.
Finally a feminist poster that is an egalitarian.

...

...

No.

memes

i was having an argument with my girlfriend about this the other day.

from a strictly marxist point of view i told her if a poor exploited women gets raped and a bourgeoisie gets raped we should celebrate the rape of the bourgoise girl.

we should be going out of our way to destroy the bourgeoisie exploiters any means necessary. no sympathy for their "women" just like how we have no sympathy for their men. because we are the true equalizer of the sexes.

end my life

That's fucking stupid. They don't stop being bourgeoisie because they get raped.

Holla Forums

they don't stop being bourgeoisie just because they are women

They stop being bourgeoisie because they get robbed, though. So by that logic if you rape someone it's fine if leave them destitute afterwards.

read a book

read a book you nigger

Holla Forums, bourgeoisie doesn't mean rich, bourgeoisie means uses private industry to extract surplus value from the proletariat

yes, but you need tools to do that. if you take those tools away, you are robbing them

You mean the means of production. Yeah you're right, seizing that could be seen as robbery, but I see it more as liberation.

So? How does rape factor into that at all?

is it still theft from the bourgeoisie if everything they have is stolen from the proletariat in the first place?

...

My point is that someone being a member of the bourgeoisie has everything to do with material conditions, according to commie logic. That being the case, if you're arguing that rape is fine if you're talking about the bourgeoisie, then you could take the means of production away form the bourgeoisie and turn them into non-bourgeoisie and then the rape wouldn't be fine.

All men should be given 1 wife from the state.

Female wombs are means of production of children and since all workers are entitled to a workplace, all men should receive atleast 1.

Prove me wrong, you can't.

...

Commodity fetishism at work, ladies and gentlemen!

Ah. Well according to some faggots on here apparently so.

The whole premise is based on some undefined "good" or "bad" here to start with so the whole argument is pointless.

rape isn't going to destroy capitalism and is fundamentally wrong
arguing for rape is Holla Forums's job

Does such a thing aid in the goal of the seizure of the means of production?

Inflicting needless pain is the domain of the sadist, not the revolutionary.

No, as long as you kill them before they can give birth.

dude they are bourgouise. if you start thinking just because they happened to be born with vaginas they shouldn't be raped/killed with their male bourgouise counterparts then you are a fucking retard (if any revolutionaries are gay then gay rape is cool too)

think about it. do not have pity for them just because they happened to be born with vaginas

It is wrong. And your personal ethics shouldn't allow you to.

but am not gonna say anything

marx himself said they deserve no pity

Not if it's self defence.
And when you know they'll kill you if you let them, why not kill them first?

How bourgeois.

Impertinent attempt on the part of the sentimentalist to tyrannise over individual lives. Why should then the husbands be grateful? How then are we to overcome that the state dictates?

No.

Porkies don't deserve any mercy, and if it helps make a fellow revolutionary happy, then what's the problem here?

how is a marxist so verbatim Holla Forums?

You mean woman Porky or Porky's wife?

no one mentioned compassion or pity, it's about what were trying to accomplish.

"The terror" is the forced seizure of the MOP.

If you cant reasonably justify a particular action in terms of the goal, than you have no business using it as an excuse.

male bourgeoisie will get raped. along with females. they are bourgeoisie they deserve it

get the identity politics bullshit out of your head and focus on class struggle you fucking counter revolutionary

whoops you just stepped into spook territory

do not pass go, do not collect the means of production

..you're the one bringing idpol into this dude. it has nothing to do with being male or female. rape does not help the revolution. period.

This, besides they're going to be killed anyway. We might as well get some of that surplus value back before doing so.

easy there, Pol-Pot

When did I mention anything about them being women meaning they shouldn't be killed?

Fuck off trash.

/thread

kek

no. the worst you should do with the bourgeoisie is kill them and that's only if they resist revolution. rape shouldn't be an ideal of any revolutionary society.

yeah this.