Is France one of the few nations that doesn't have neutered liberal prostests?

wouldn't bombing banks be smarter?

Plus i'm pretty sure the financial system have it's own Internet anyway. Didn't they make a fucking giant optic fiber cable under the ocean to trade a few milliseconds faster?

These are NOT forms of direct action. The French will NEVER be socialist because their entire culture is rooted in colonialism and genocide of indigenous peoples especially Muslims. Not a single white "worker" in France will risk their lives for actual socialism. Plus any socialist revolution in France will ultimately end up being national-chauvinist towards its former colonies ESPECIALLY Muslim ones like Algeria. FUCK THE FRENCH.

I know that must countries are incredibly worried about that.
That, and a strong unionized group of longshoremen could bring a country to its knees if it could strike long enough.
Not that I'm suggesting anything.
FBI pls no bully

t. Jason Unroo

Have you ever actually participated in mass action before? It build revolutionary zeal, not the other way around.

...

...

Riots are an outlet for frustrations and build up by the system in a controlled way for whatever minor issue wich is an symptom of the system itself. They also are some kind of activism for leftist organisations for radical demand to reform the system to their interest.

Nobody dares to attack the actual system cause a fuckload of supposed rebels actually want to maintain the system or depend on the supposed indoctrinated masses by the dominant liberal idealogy wich heavily premotes pascifism (Work class) to rise up. So the people who depend on the masses avoid any action wich is will not be approved by public opinion. (People like this are stuck in the 19th century)

I would heavily recommend Ted Kaczynski his work. As it covers how leftism has been coopted to serve the system and how you actually will take down the system by hitting what civilisation depends upon. He does come off as an Liberal Individualist tho with the appeal of human nature, he is the more humanist version (So more easy accessible) of post-left anti-civ theory.

didn't stalin start riots and rob banks ?

Fuck Stalin but
Robbing banks was a good move from him in his young age and don't forget the highly organized system the Russian revolutionizes with comrades from the inside and out side Russia and how militance they were
and most importantly is the fact that THEY HAD AN ACTUAL PLAN AND FUCKING CLEAR GOALS

meh we don't want to be pol2.0
Then attack the head of snake
read sun tzu and sergey nechayev

I am translating society of the spectacle and rehabilitate Marx to fit the islamig world
What are you doing ?
oh weebshitposting

LMAO break the glass dude Viva equality yeeeeeeh fuck the government i am so cooool
Plans goals ? that is some authoritarian shit don't want sorry

…and then everybody complains of burnout because there's no lasting results.

Can you talk more about this? I'm very interested in this kind of mixing since middle east is one of the few places where people still honestly resist globalization and integration and are not just posturing LARPers. There's something about Islam that makes it a good model for resistance today, like the notion that Jihad/struggle is the vital part of existence, or their willingness to risk their lives instead of accepting the western ideology of secure and banalized life.

You're messing with your quotes, m8.

French protests seem really hardcore

Will anything happen though?

>>>/kys/

It's not an end in itself of course. The working class has to react to policies against it somehow, and lacking the proper tools of organization they're pushed towards spontaneous outburts of violence.

No because this is terrible action. A few broken windows and having public property destroyed hurts the owning classes as much as graffiti does. It's better than nothing because it at least recognizes the principle of having to do something when you're being fucked with, but they need better tools to articulate it.

Without strikes, without tax protests, without a decent left-wing party to vote and without the organizations that can make these possible in a wide scale, protest is worthless.

Yeah, basically riots are good to the extent as they show that some sort of political will and energy is still there and can spread their sentiment, but they lack any intelligence or strategy. That's why it's so easy for the system to manage resistance, and ultimately it could be said that the system even likes it because without this outlet certain people might actually lash out in unpredictable and therefore ungovernable ways - which is what left "terrorism" usually was.

And these riots aren't violent anyway, the way the used to be a few decades back when protesters were willing to shoot and be shot at. Although maybe protesters are becoming less pacifistic recently, but it's still far away from being able to take real risks. If people prefer security and comfort within the system instead of risking their lives for a revolution then the system can be calm and maintain its power without much visible force. And this is precisely the situation we're in now. There might be still a few old-school militants out there but they're so isolated and their methods so preventable within today's surveillance and control apparatus that they can't even do anything worthwhile even though they really want to.

apart from tax protests we have those

This. Riots are pure spectacle and take us exactly 0 steps closer to seizure of the MoP or social revolution.

t. American

this video is exactly what I mean
ill-will-editions.tumblr.com/

I mean listen to them, it's just kids yelling and chanting, been there done that, it's just that the police have a different get-up

he also incited riots