US Tennis accidentally plays Nazi version of German anthem

The United States Tennis Association "accidentally" played the Nazi version of the German anthem. Cucked-Deutschfags BTFO.
archive.is/UejgH
KEK, are any of you guys responsible for this faux pas? Are we going to Make Anthems Great Again?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=fdzr0eMe7kA
youtube.com/watch?v=sQtr2kjIrMw
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_(mythology)
archive.org/details/HitlerMangaVolume1inEnglish
rarehistoricalphotos.com/rare-color-photo-adolf-hitler-shows-true-eye-color-date-unknown/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Fuck off kike

Playing the Naz-era anthem on purpose, unaware to everyone but the triggered Germans, sounds hilarious. How is JOKINGLY asking if someone did it for the lulz kikey?

I can neither confirm nor deny any involvement in anything

...

JIDF training has really gone to shit

The bigger thing here is that none of the Burgers knew or cared, if it's not the star-spangled banner than who cares

Glorious. Is there any footage of it, I want to see the German athletes reacting. Perhaps it will stir some of their repressed pride.

KRAUTCUCKS BTFO
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

That's what makes it funny–like a stealth prank. Perhaps it was an attempt to unnerve the Germans before the competition.

...

...

Actually, watching it here:
I don't see the big deal. I think the tennis players were using that to justify a poor performance.

...

Well it was the last time Germans had any sort of pride in their nation so it makes sense.

I can only imagine how overwhelmingly smug the couple of redpilled guys there were.

...

Honestly though, the deutchlandlied is best with just the original three stanzas. Horst-wessel lied is not that good.

Honestly, looking at the actual translation of the part being discussed, what is the big fucking deal? Seriously, because it was added in during the "evil nazi era" is all, is that it?

Is there a vid

The song says that Germany is the best. That's literally what they're butthurt about. They're butthurt that Germans were represented with a song saying "Germany is the best".

Absolutely problematic

The first verse of their own national anthem is banned in germany for hate speech. Mind blowingly dumb.

You glorious bastard.

The article pretends like Hitler invented it kek, what fucking fags. It is sad that so many Germans are having their history (that predates WWII) ripped away from them because of the nazi-boogeyman.

Soon it will be raised in Sport Events and Ceremonies one of two official flags of the German Reich

Here.

Are you surprised?

It isn't actually he wrong anthem, it's just a part of thier anthem they don't usually sing since the Nazi era. The USA also has a much longer anthem than most normies are aware and only one verse is sang. That being said, probably not many of those here…

Yes, it's terrible.


I was when I learned of it.

Many Anthems are long (the Japanese and the Spainish anthems are exceptions). It is accustomed to play just the chorus and the main verse.

I'm not even German. But her insolence boils my blood. She deserved to be executed then and there.

How cucked do you have to be to not like hearing "Germany over all."/

youtube.com/watch?v=fdzr0eMe7kA

From the OP I thought they accidentally fucked up and played "Horst Wessel Lied" but no they literally played "Deutschland Ueber Alles" a song that has existed for decades before Hitler was even borrn yet because it was used in National Socialist Germany its a "Nazi anthem" now.
YOUR CULTURE IS EVIL GOY

Very. When I was in Yermoney and was talking to a relatives friend she asked what I liked about Germany, I replied:
I think she was also Polish, kek.

Agreed, that webm is disgusting

Newfags have to lurk 3 months before posting

Hitler even talks about in Mein Kampf how all the more "civil" parties in his time, would politely sing Deutschland über alles, and then be on their way, and compares it to how they burst forth with emotion at National Socialist rallies singing it endlessly.

>tfw Polish, German, North Italian, and Anglo

this is overblown by presstitudes and good goy signalling people

first off, it's not a "Nazi era" hymn, the lyrics were composed in 1841 and it was made the national hymn by social democrats in 1922

also, it's not the "wrong" hymn because the whole song is the three stanza Deutschlandlied of which only the last one is allowed to be officially used as the national hymn by ZOG, the first two stanzas are not illegal to sing however

it would have been the wrong song (and much more hilarious) if the guy had sung Gott erhalte Franz den Kaiser

heresy

tbh Horst Wessel Lied isn't patriotic and is more relevant to just the NSDAP, while the Deutschlandlied is patriotic.

Americans only know The Star Spangled Banner, Stars and Stripes forever, O' Canada, and maybe God Save the Queen.

What about Hail Columbia?

CURRENT YEAR
Oy vey, it's the current, year, accidentally playing the wrong thing is supposed to be impossible!

Star Spangled banner and O'Canada are frequently played at sporting events, God Save The Queen people hear occasionally when British stuff is heard, Stars and Stripes forever is technically the national march of the united states, so people know it, but anything else is not really popular enough to be known by the majority of Americans.

...

Christ, they're acting like it's the worst thing ever. Is the modern Germany really that demoralized? You gotta hand it to the kikes, the common German is now a pile of sloppy, weak clay that you can mold into any ideology. It's time for a military coup. I just hope that since Germany is the center of all EU shit it the rest of Europe and Russia doesn't fucking nuke themselves over "muh nazis."

Lived in US most of my life and never heard of either of those. Agree about Oh Canada and God Save the Queen (Sex Pistols version).

...

It's really funny how it's called a "Nazi anthem" when Nazi Germany used the first part of the anthem and then switched to the Horst-Wessel song

You have to go back. You're un-American

You probably did hear stars and stripes forever, you probably just didn't know what it was called.

My parents are American, just born overseas because my father was deployed.


That's probably true.

Git gud at being American faggot. You're American or you're not. There is no "most of my life", either you're in or not.

Glad they changed it.

So let me guess, they played the actual anthem starting with "Deutschland, Deutschland über alles" and not just the third stanza? Fucking cucked Germans can't even sing their own anthem without being accosted by six million kvetches.

I DID NAZI THAT COMING….did Jew?

Most of his life means he's either an immigrant, visa in a foreign county, or parents or himself is in army either way you put it he might be a patriot,

what a bunch of faggots. don't they know that CURRENT YEAR was 2015? We're in the year 0002 C.Y.

fuck off, you divisive cunt.

You shut your whore mouth tbh, it's a wonderful piece.

But you don't get offended and throw a hissy fit when someone sings the second verse of the Star-Spangled Banner.


She got triggered probably because she's Slav mystery meat and saying "Germany over all" went against her foreign sensibilities. That's what happens when you open your borders.


wew

there is nothing Nazi about it. The anthem predates nazi germany by a hundred years.

I watched the video and they were all smiling and singing along

Petkovic studied Political Jewry (PolSci) so on top of being mindfucked for being German the cunt is extra histrionic.

The video is actually incredibly disturbing – all of the German fans and athletes were singing the third stanza, I guess as a "protest" and to try to out-sing the American performing the first stanza.

If there are any Germans out there, is the situation really that bad over there? I can understand the Holohoax shame but I hope it's not actually mainstream for people to be afraid of their own national anthem.

The site won't let me embed so here's the video for those interested

youtube.com/watch?v=sQtr2kjIrMw

Maybe he has dual citizenship :^) Might be one of your greatest allies

...

I'm just guessing.

TOP KEK I FOUND THE VIDEO

It wasn't an accident, it's signalling by the person who plaid it.

WEBM

It isn't a mazi version at all Germany above all else refers to the fact that Germans have lived separate in different princdoms and kingdoms until recently it's a call for unity between Germans

Also anyone wondering why a german would be offended about it just look at any Western education slavery is the ultimate whitey sin and being a naattzie is the original Sim being taught to Germans this all started after Ww2 when the (((liberators))) changed every single thing they could about Germany including what the youth learns

It did, the salt was immense. You can see the Germans screaming.
One German player said she was so upset she almost walked off the court.

I saw one cutie smiling during it though…

If you can't picture them looking good in an SS helmet, then they are unlikely the Germans worth a shit anyways.

Let me get this straight. Germany is so cucked they skip the two stanzas of their national anthem because "da ebil Nazis" and only play the third stanza of the song. They might as well replace their anthem with John Lennon's "Imagine" song or some other cucky song to show their not "ebil nazis".

That song is probably considered islamophobic in modern Germany.

Its not even a supremacist song, it was made by liberals during the 1848 revolution. It is about putting away regional and dynastic differences to put germania first and create a united german state.

Your right, it needs to be replaced with a cool nasheed song to appease them.

People like you faggots are the worst posters on this board instead of trying to find out what and why happens to the European nations and it's colonies you just endlessly post in whichever current X is cuxkd tread being all too happy to say cuckhold cuckhold you kike pieces of shot are less than trash and don't provide anything useful but resentment among Americans and swedes and Germans and english there is a reason why Germany is the way it is there is a reason America and England are the way they are but (((you))) don't care about that just call them cuckhol. Try makimg this thread about the US of A and see how quick you get reported for being a kike and how fast the modes ban you faggot ass shitskin

You're right, it needs to be replaced with a cool nasheed song to appease them.

Your memes are cancerous, Moshe.

you need to leave

Cool it. I live in Canada, and I have no qualms about making fun of how cucked this shithole it. Don't be so sensitive.

Supreme Kek. Is this a webm of this?

...

And nowadays do they just not talk about it over there (in Germany)?

Deutchlandlied is shit, Heil dir im Siegerkranz is where it's at.

Also Die Wacht am Rhein.

Pretty much anything that was glorified by the NatSocs, or even WWI related patriotism, is fucking hated.

So most of Prussia and it's national heroes (big exception to Frederick the Great), anything pre-Christian and of course anything NatSoc.
This includes songs, military marches, etc.

It makes me sick. Poles get their own ethno state, (and even Kikes get their own ethno state / Israel.) meanwhile Germany is getting swamped by invaders. You would think that with its history, Germany would be getting its ethno state. But no, instead the neoliberal brainwashing that forced the masochistic guilt-complex onto the whole of Germany endures. You even have politicians openly advocating for the genocide of the German people!

Sure, Poland is a bit Kiked up like anywhere else the bit the further you go up the totem pole in the private, public, military and financial sectors, but they just want to get some of that sweet NATO funding and other foreign cash flows. And they're already chasing after the Chinese dragon for more gold.

Does it have an end goal? Nope! Poland as a state has no clear position on its own on international issues and so takes the side of the stronger party. (Read: USA & EU) That infograph above is right. The problem is having too many cooks in the kitchen. There is no clear unified vision for the country's direction aside from ensuring its own tenuous survival after failing to exist as a country for far too many times for its people's liking. And the amount of turmoil going on inside the country is mortifying.

Any time people step forward to being real change to the nation and put it on course in the right direction, trust a kike or their accomplice to be there to put a knife in their back.

Why did I think that was carl the cuck in the thumbnail?

Polish toy manufacturer Cobi stated Wednesday in Warsaw that it will continue to sell its line of Nazi themed games for children to play with, because of the company belief that through fun children can be taught history.

How is that not a vision.
I'm not hating on the Poles, that entire history is far too gray to blame either them or the Germans.

I do think taking Pomerania and Silesia was absolute bullshit, but I also think Warmia and Posen are clearly Polish lands.

It's all pointless discussion because at this stage, there are no Germans left there. There aren't any left in the actual Prussian region, let alone the later conquests of the Polish partition.

I agree with the majority of that sentiment. Germany villainy is a myth concocted by the allies.

First they tried teaching us that Hitler was the biggest monster that ever lived, and that Dr. Mengele is cartoonishly evil. When that grew stale, and people were beginning to suspect something, they came up with the whole, "banality of evil" concept. But now it turns out that their whole narrative is one too many fabrications covering up the actual history which is readily available to real historians working within recognised academic institutions, who specialise in the subject.

Now as it turned out, countries used to dick with each other a lot, as they still do. In the years before (especially Victorian times) England did not want Germany to be a world Power. France desired that there should be no Power called Germany. Therefore there was a very essential difference. After WWI but during pre-WWII Germany, Hitler was not 'fighting' for their position as a World-Power but only for the existence of Germany as a country, for national unity and the daily bread of their children. Taking this point of view into consideration, only two States remained to them as possible allies in Europe – England and Italy.

The economic and military power of France retained a position of absolute hegemony and had been exercising military power against post-WWI Germany to extract debts from it by force. France had been for the whole of history and over the course of the second world war the implacable enemy of Germany. It would not have mattered what Governments have ruled or will someday rule in France, whether Bourbon or Jacobin, Napoleonic or Bourgeois-Democratic, Clerical Republican or Red Bolshevik, their foreign policy will have always been directed towards acquiring possession of the Rhine frontier and consolidating France's position on the river by disuniting and dismembering Germany.

England, who remained not at all pleased to see a France on whose military power there is no check in Europe, and who one day might undertake the support of a policy which in some way or other might come into conflict with British interests. Nor would England have been pleased to see France in possession of such enormous coal and iron mines in Western Europe as would make it possible for her to have played a role in world-commerce which might threaten danger to British interests. Moreover, England would never be pleased to see a France whose political position on the Continent, owing to the then dismemberment of the rest of Europe, which seemed so absolutely assured that she is not only able to have resumed a French world-policy on great lines but would even have found herself compelled to do so. The bombs which were once dropped by the Zeppelins might be multiplied by the thousand every night. The historic military predominance of France is a weight that pressed heavily on the hearts of the Old World Empire over which Great Britain had ruled.

Nor could Italy have desired, nor would she have desired, any further strengthening of France's power in Europe. The future of Italy would ideally be conditioned by the development of events that took place in the Mediterranean and by the political situation in the area surrounding that sea. The reason that led Italy into the War was not a desire to contribute towards the aggrandizement of France but rather to deal her hated Adriatic rival a mortal blow. Any further increase of France's power on the Continent would hamper the development of Italy's future, and Italy does not deceive herself by thinking that racial kindred between the nations will in any way eliminate rivalries.

Serious and impartial consideration proves that it is these two States, Great Britain and Italy, whose natural interests not only do not contrast with the conditions essential to the existence of the German nation of that era but are identical with them, to a certain extent.

Hitler was a hero fighting for the very survival of his people. He was fighting in a world that very much wanted to see the Germans disappear as a people entirely.

Tfw Hitler will never be openly recognised and revered in his country of birth and in Germany as a national Hero!

The French were massive cunts, but I can at least respect them more than I respect the Brits.

As far as European nations go, Britain is by far the dirtiest fucking scum. I'd rather the Spaniards over the British. And for all their shit, they were weak cunts who couldn't stand up for themselves. France won WWI, and the USA (mostly on the back of ethnic Germans) and Soviet Russia, won WWII, as far as Europe is concerned.

All Britain was ever good at was the intelligence gathering. They're pussies who can't actually win a damn war, only conspire and sabotage the efforts of the enemy.

to many feels

(Checked)

Fuck this shit play it and be proud.

Give it time.

Then we must meme it into existence.

Also, "Germans" didn't just "skip" those stanzas.
They were FORCED to skip those stanzas.

Y'all need to play some Euro Truck simulator 2 to realize how small Germany really is.
(Even back then, when it was bigger)

And it was occupied by continent sized adversaries at the end of the war.

Whatcha gonna do? Skip your stanzas or get wiped out by ((( golems )))?

This isn't really applicable anymore gorram it. Yes yes, muh demoralization and muh browbeat by allies, but the fact is that at this point, there is no steady enforcing of the policies of denazification (which really should be called deprussification but that's another story) that first fucked with them at a cultural level.

And you can't excuse them either. Studies are starting to show Gen Z in America at least are uncucking themselves by sheer virtue of access to information, and while Germany limits that info somewhat, that's a fairly recent phenomenon, and those same kids in Germany would have access to the same info online.

At this point, only the Germans can save themselves. There are no excuses left to make here. The same applies for all of us.

Germany is cucked together with basically every western european country. It's a fact. Calling them for what they are serves to motivate those muslim cock slurping faggots and isn't the same as typical d&c which involves bringing up historic disputes or questioning whether they are white.

Europe is tiny! You can cross several countries by car!

I'm still not sure about all this meme magic. Is it safe?

The opinion that Adolf Hitler was an agent of diabolic Forces, that his initiation was only a monstrous counter-initiation, and that his Order of the SS was a sinister brotherhood of black magicians could not – without a doubt! – be any more widespread among anti-Hitlerians with more or less a smattering of occultism. (And they are not lacking.)

The most convincing counter-argument seems to come from India. In the West, indeed, the confusion in the field of knowledge of principles is today such as it is difficult to say if there is there still a group that legitimately can pride itself on a true affiliation with the Tradition. There is not, therefore, a point of comparison between the attitude of true initiates and that of charlatans. According to René Guénon, practically all the societies of Europe that claim nowadays to be "initiatory" would be classified under the latter heading. However, it is their members who make themselves heard, who are agitated, who take a position against Hitlerism – as Louis Powels and the Jew Bergier did every time they could in the review Planet. In fact, I do not know of even one European group interested in esoteric doctrines that is not definitely anti-Hitlerian. (I may be deceived, certainly. I would like, on this point, to be deceived.)

Look at those grins. I can’t recall the last time I saw a German so happy.

I agree, but it ain't that easy.

The allies might not be doing it that much, anymore.
But now it's the Germans doing it.

That's why the kikes, today, can say: "Well, YOU let the invaders in yourself! ;^)"

Or Christians say:"Oh yeah, your ancestors converted to Christianity voluntarily ;^)"

or blacks can say:"Oh yeah, all whites had slaves!" because now even whites believe it.

A Jew allows himself to be converted because he knows that a baptism doesn't make a gentile out of him.

That isn't even the natsoc anthem, lmfao.

Those two things are not equivalent and the issue here isn't the policies being enacted by the government by the people's reaction in light of those policies. I'm obviously not blaming Germans for Merkel. I'm blaming them for the inaction in the face of Merkel.

...

Because that's the 3rd Stanza, the one they're allowed to sing.

That said they didn't seem TOO bothered by the first two, probably because there's nothing fucking offensive about the damn thing, I guess except references to Memel and what not since the song was written in a time when such places were majority German.

But fucks sake, what's so hard about changing it up a bit. Replace Memel with Oder or something.

I loved how healthy all their jaws and faces were. Such a fit, good looking people.

All I have to say is if you wish to scare the living shit out of a Jew you show them this.

It is a powerful image and not just because National Socialist Germany used it for it reaches far deeper than that.

The question you should ask yourself is why?
I do not believe for a second that Adolf chose it by accident.

didn't he chose it because he was Christian or Catholic or something and he saw it in the churches, and he chose the color red because he saw how well it worked for the commie propaganda

Wherefore the use of memes is a natural power, when Jews perform the working of their spells, they must be judged to be in the height of criminal wickedness, although some have attempted to regard it from another point of view. And they argue thus, that as we do not know the hidden powers of nature, it may be that the Jews are merely employing or seeking to employ these hidden powers: assuredly if they are employing the natural power of natural things to bring about a natural effect, this must be perfectly lawful, as indeed is obvious enough. Or even let us conceive that if the superstitious employ natural things, as, for example, by writing down certain characters or unknown names of some kind, and that then they use these runes for restoring a person to health, or for inducing friendship, or with some useful end, and not at all for doing any damage or harm, in such cases, it may be granted, I say, that there is no express invocation of demons; nevertheless it cannot be that these spells are employed without a tacit invocation, wherefore all such charms must be judge to be wholly unlawful. Jewish sophistry cannot argue otherwise the insidiously self-serving nature of their devilry.

that is part of the story I am sure, the red as a backing color I believe is correct and as you say, but I feel you could place the symbol on a blue backing and it would still have much the same impact.

My local cathedral you can still swastikas carved into the stone around the Lady chapel, but the Christians adopted the symbol and we all know it is much older than that.

Adolf may have simply adopted it for Christian reasons (I guess we will never really know for sure).

I personally feel there is much more to it than that, it is almost to perfect, there is a visceral almost primal feeling to it.. something hard to pin down yet it impacts you…. must have frightened the living shit out of the Commie Jew scum at the time.

Because Wolfenstein needed another franchise reboot.

Read this my lads

volkischpaganism.com/2014/10/08/carl-jung-on-hitler-as-personification-of-the-wotan-archetype/

Hitler intentionally crafted his entire aesthetic, and by extension the volkspartei's aesthetic to intentionally match the Wotanic Father Archetype. Hitler intentionally crafted everything about his message to speak directly to the soul of the Aryan peoples. That's why there's overlap between Germans and Poo In Loos loving him, because deep in their brains the imagery is the same. They innately understand the same way we do.

Hitler was an absolute aesthetic genius.

Holy shit I hate this fucking cuck

Honestly, that song gives me the chills every time I hear it. It's very good melody wise despite not knowing what its actually saying. It should be the anthem, period. It's one of the best.

well that would explain much as to why it speaks to my European soul (Mother is Austrian and Fathers family come from Germany). Racial memory.

Just made the mistake of Cucklesearching Hitler. Search results: "People mystified by the rise of Hitler." The Kike-vision is set to high on some of the misinformation being disseminated.

Indeed. And it's sad how they are forced to fail to acknowledge how they had a man inspire the devotion of a generation, and create a vast, mass movement, that eventually took control of the most culturally and technologically advanced nation in Europe!

The NSDAP, particularly Himmler, was extremely deep into occultism and symbolism. The swastika was indeed thought up as a symbol because Hitler saw it in a christian church, the red symbolizing the blood of commies. They went as far back as studying the old zoroastrian and Hindu meanings of it, when they took a trip to India and through the ottoman empire, if I remember correctly.

this part of the history of it I know, it is an old image even in Europe as our ow ancestors used it as well.

Silesia fought a war to join Poland you nigger, I'm Silesian we're good thanks.

One of his strongest admirers, surprisingly, was Winston Churchill - (who, as a young man had been a friend of the Kaiser Wilhelm II).

In 1936 Churchill wrote, 'Hitler is the greatest German of the age. He has restored Germany's honor.'

In 1937 Churchill described Hitler's achievements as 'among the most remarkable in the whole history of the world.'

In 1938 Churchill's admiration for Hitler was almost ecstatic: 'I have always said that if Great Britain were defeated in war I hoped we should find a Hitler to lead us back to our rightful position among nations.'

Best version ( my vid)

I believe the Germans were forced to nix the first part of the anthem after WWII by the Allied war commission. Secondly the Anthem and the Deutschland über alles section predates Nazism!!!!
Someone that lived in Germany told me once that everything good that came before the "nazis" such as say Prussians are seen as "nazi" by the current post war government.

Nope. They tried to sing over it.

...

Terrible tune, everyone knows that God saves the queen is not a great anthem

Because he was a fag who loved Muslim immigration?

Funny how we always win then isn't it?

Terrible tune, everyone knows that God saves the queen is not a great anthem

Because he was a fag who loved Muslim immigration?

Funny how we always win then isn't it?

The image goes back to prehistoric times, they found swastika carvings dating back to 11 000BC around modern day Ukraine, if I remember correctly. It was mostly used to symbolize the sun, while others (Hindus, if I remember correctly) used it to symbolize fertility. It was found in ancient Greece, in ancient Egypt, in ancient Rome, all around Asia, in parts of Polynesia, It was even found among the Mayas and Aztecs. Not to mention all over Europe, of course. What is the real meaning, I don't know. All I know is that it frighten kikes and such evil forces like nothing else. It's practically imprinted in their DNA.

With American help yeah.

France has an ebbin Military and Naval history. As well as a history of art and literature.

And France can cook food, unlike the British.

France is fine when it doesn't get puppeteer-ed by the British into attacking Germany.

Am I seeing misreading these, or am I seeing shit being said about Freddy? Freddy was to Hitler what Hitler is to us. You should see how Hitler fangasms over Fredrick the Great. It's adorable!

Okay, but seriously. What did Fred do wrong?


I'll agree to that. All the top chiefs at the swanky hotels here are French.


France will be too busy fighting Britain/Whatever they were calling themselves then.

1940 Germans in France

What Brits do have for them though in the realm of food is mighty fine beers. I'm a sous chef and yeah, french techniques are at the base of most Western recipes. In North America, many higher-end restaurants will serve French food. They were truly autistic about their palates to the point food was one of their biggest motivators in colonialism.

...

Nothing, just some shitposters ignorant on history as usual.

It's actually rather funny. Well before it found popularity in common everyday speech, in the pre-1990's, the word autistic had been in common use within the psychiatric and mental health nursing to describe all kinds of overlapping and unrelated behaviours. I'm curious if the word has found its way into non-English use or if an equivalent term is used?

But indeed. French are mad about their food. When it comes to cooking, they mean buisness.

...

Silesia has been part of the HRE for thousands of years, and in German hands for 200 years before the WWII map redrawings.
Furthermore, to claim a Silesian is a Slav rather than a German ethnicity is a fucking falsehood. Slav influences? No doubt. But it was more Czech than German.

You want to be with your ethnic brothers? Either Germany or the Czech Republic are who you should be with. Not the fucking Poles. Sorry if you're as ignorant on your own culture as the Scots are of theirs and actually pretend the current situation is anything but fitting.

Not that you've presented any evidence of being Silesian, and not just some Pole that moved in post WWII, as it happened in Pomerania.

Americans love to suck taco penis
Watch me get banned and you not kike

It really is sad, Germans have one of the oldest histories of Europeans, most people don't realize even 2000 years ago in Caesar's time they were still already established and well known.

Even right before Nazi's was Germany's highest point IMO, the formation of the Empire in 1870, the first time Germans united.

They BTFO out of Russia, France, UK, and the USA all combined in science and technology.

What's a Silesi… It's got an Eagle. Yep. Eagle of authenticity.

Okay, so they're a Polish ethnographic group, and they speak a dialect of Polish, but have been so been so deeply influenced by German culture that they've been Germanified at this point. They have moved beyond the stage of Germaboo. We have reached that scenario of shifting borders and forced conversions like in 4x games and some RTS. They just gave up and gave you your own Eagle.

Again, WWI was won by France, WWII by Russia and America (on the back of German ethnics)
Brits are shit at warfare. Oh sure you find it easy fucking with shitskins, but then you get your asses handed to you by even the fucking Boers.
And the worst part of it is you have the nerve to act as if you're not perfidious. You will spit in the face of even your oldest alliances if it betters you, see 1890 crisis with Portugal. You will spit in the face of your religion if it betters you, see siding against Russia in the Crimean War.

I'm not going to pretend I wouldn't rather a Brit over a fucking Arab, but don't expect me to ever tolerate your cuntish asses after we're out of this fucking Islamic mess. Honestly after it's all said and done, the EU is dead and the Arabs are out the door, we should just revive Napoleon's continental system.

I'm not
The big exception is because old Fritz is that damn good as far as the Germans are concerned. No matter how hard the kikes try they can't quite create popular opinion against him, even in historian circles, because he was absolutely fucking amazing in all respects for his time.

They have it easier vilifying guys like Bismarck, Moltke the Elder and just about every officer in WWI and WWII that isn't Paul von Lettow-Vorbeck (because muh Africans) or an anti-natsoc conspirator.

Bismarck's case is an especially egregious case, given just how utterly important and critical he was to the founding of Germany, and how absolutely fucking GOAT the man was. But he's vilified because "muh Poles" and "muh dismantling of the liberal and socialist parties of the time"

They are tied to another.

Denazification wasn't successful all over the country even back then, but we (hell, the western world) are slowly winning.
I'd love to see Merkels head get blown apart by a bullet, but unless there is a full blown national (and international, because you will alwaysa have a good goy golem come back again to stab any bad goy in the back) coup, nothing will change.

The right has been winning, especially in America, but it will take longer in Europe, and especialy in Germany.
But neo Weimar has been boiling everyones balls for some time now.
Don't despair, it will all turn out good in the end.

...

That isn't going to work when the major military powers left are all bad goys.
Who do you even have that the Jews could use to fuck with the Germans if they decided to say fuck it and vote AfD?

TWO YEARS
IT HAS ALWAYS BEEN TOO YEARS
LOWERING STANDARDS LIKE THIS MAKE BOARDS GO TO SHIT
SHAME ALL NEWFAGS INTO LURKING FOR
TWO
FUCKING
YEARS
this is the way it must be

There are demonstrations against her. But it's not like it could escalate into an armed riot, yet. Merkel is running a tight ship with her disinformation nation police-state.

It will become available soon Deutschebro

The millions of young male migrants in Europe, along with some cucked natives.

The Western Allies wanted to breed the fight out of the Germans after the war it would seem they succeeded although I'm not sure it was through breeding ( not as if they haven't tried) I think they did it chemically through water or food…. it would also explain why the west is increasingly producing more and more beta males and faggots.

Perhaps it is my own inherent bias, but when I see those demonstrations, I do not see people prepared to fight if needs be.

Hahaha, that's funny, but seriously I mean actual capable fighters, not shitskins and cucked libtards.
I mean an America, a France, a Russia. Heck even Britain would probably do.
Which major military power could the Jews realistically throw at Germany right now?

Well, the real word we should be using is obsessed, as it's usually when someone is obsessive-compulsive about something that we call him an autist. There is also when someone is totally oblivious when it comes to social interaction, which is way closer to the real definition. I have a younger cousin who's both ADHD and autistic and Jesus does that combination makes someone dangerous. When he was a young kid he once rushed me while I was laying down with my phone in hands and kneed me in the balls, not realizing the pain that comes with it. He though I was playing a video game and wanted to watch. Motherfucker made me almost throw up from the pain.

Russia which is why they are trying to pick a fight with them. Possibly China who is in the jews pocket.

Obviously the migrants Europe has now are the cowardly that fled from their countries in the first place, but some will fight for promises of gibs. Even the non cucked Germans aren't top tier military fighters ATM, the modern age will do that to most men, and there haven't been any large scale wars in a while.

Don't underestimate subversive lefties and migrants equipped with foreign money and weapons.

In this age, a civil war would probably be one of the most threatening things to a western nation, not a foreign invader.

That's what the Jews are likely betting on anyway, a civil war, since they lost the US.

Its not about sovergity clearly, we didn't want your filthy colonists from over crowded shit holes flocking in and destroying our careful way of life. The very reason such "living spaces" were sought after in the first place, the myth of "Unifying Germans" is nothing more than bullshit as you made my grandparents turn to slaving in the factory or dying for Germany at large. What do you think we chose, those who invade our way of being, or those who respect it?


Yes, just like the "Baltic" peoples Prussians who were eventually deceptfully absorbed into Germany (rather than disappearing completely) and many Poles who lived in such lands per lease. That's exactly my point. We should surely turn into another bland, indifferent German populated abstraction on a map. That isn't to say our culture survived perfectly, but Silesia fused with Poland sooner than Prussia was "abolished", and we both know which language and "culture" is one of the past.

*would instead of should oops lol.

Because when you are fighting a war you should be helping your enemy to win, right?

When will the Germans make a great game partly based on their own folklore and traditions? Germany, make gaming great again! Make Swiss merchants fund it! (Yeah, I know the lore in Witcher is based on myths from across a lot of Slav and Balkan stuff, but you know what I meant!)

I like to think their choice if words is a result of a lack of familiarity with the language, drunkenness, lack of sleep, or youthfulness. Possibly a combination of all four.

Surprised they didn't make the cut really.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_(mythology)

First off, Silesia was given to the control of a German state (or more specifically at the time, German monarch) in the Silesian wars of the 18th century. To speak about factories in that context is asinine.

Secondly, the "myth of unifying Germans" in the context of Silesia coming to be a part of the greater German nation is also not a proper way to phrase it, as Silesia became a province of a unified Germany in the same manner the rest of Prussia did, following 1871 and the unification of the German states.

Thirdly, and I'm assuming here, if you mean to say that Germany invaded Poland to take back Danzig and the Polish corridor, also know as Warmia, also know as West Prussia, and Posen I will agree with you that it was an illegitimate act of war given the demographics at the time. I wont sit here and pretend Hitler was a goody two shoes, because one I am not a German, and two I am not a natsoc.

But we aren't discussing Warmia and Posen.
We are discussing Silesia

Silesia was German when it was taken from Germany
It was German when it's people were displaced and forced over the border of the Oder.

To state Silesian is not a German culture, at least in some respects, is asinine. To state that Silesian Slavic influences are Polish and not Czech is even greater asinine.

And finally, and this is just to clarify something


Silesia was never part of Poland culturally in any significant fashion. It was ruled by the same kings of the Piast dynasty for some hundred years after the entirety of Bohemia and Moravia was also incorporated, but to claim they were the same is the same as saying my country of Portugal should be a province of Spain because we were at one point ruled by the same king.
And comparing your case to the Baltics is entirely a falsehood because the Baltic Prussians were exterminated on a religious basis. This was high middle ages when religion mattered plenty more than ethnicity as far as Europe was concerned. Silesians at the time they came under HRE rule under the Bohemians, were forcefully displaced.

Also you've yet to respond to the argument that you're nothing but a Pole that moved in post WWI rather than a Silesian, of either Slavic of Germanic descent. See I very much doubt you're from Silesia as your entire rhetoric seems to be that of a Pole who's still buttmad Bismarck changed all your signs.

Apologies I made a mistake here. Technically speaking it came under the control of a German monarch before then, as it was ruled by the Habsburgs after all the Bohemian dominions came under their rule, but it was specifically ruled by the Prussians from the 18th century henceforth.

He was a fag who said he would be fine if Muslim immigrants came to Germany

He also hated his own culture in favour of being a oui-aboo

Yeh, we got a lot of American help in the Napoleonic wars

It was won by the British navy starving out Germany

Whoa-what-whaaaat??! What am I reading?! Why have I never heard of this obscure bit of lore? What even is this?!

Wouldn't be a satanpost without some form of deceit.

This guy gets actually knows what he's talking about. Satan trips confirm.
t. Pole.

Serbs incorporating cuckoldry by Germans into their ideology, disappointed in them tbh, never took the kebab removers for cucks

I misread a few things in the other post. Yep. I agree with all that.
t. The dumb Pole. Not the Silesian one.

What deceit? The Germans made a demand to basically lock up a Polish representative with full signing powers in a room to intimidate him into signing whatever they wanted, same way they did with the Czechs.
They played it as the Poles rejecting when what really happened was that the Polish representative did not have full authority to sign the terms presented to him, really regardless of what those terms were, because at that point the Germans had already been informed that they would not be getting free reign like they had with the Czechs.

Warmia and Posen were still majority Polish at the time of the outbreak of WWI and this was not even accounting for soldiers that never returned, families that moved both to and from those areas. They were Polish and there is no other way to argue that. Danzig is a case I am willing to admit could be given to Germany, but the Polish corridor being made German would be ridiculous, from an ethnic perspective.

Hitler wanted the war. Hitler got the war. And then he decided it'd be a good idea to not allow his (primarily Prussian) military staff, where the true heart of Germany lied, to fight that war. And guess what happened, he fucking lost.

Because Hitler was a stupid, idiotic Austrian whose only talent, and admittedly he was very very good at this, was gathering around him people of greater genius than himself in specific. areas. The aforementioned military staff, Albert Speer, Goebbels, etc

Nie bądź głupi. The Times of London editorialized that Hitler was right and supported the annexation of the Sudetenland by Germany. The editorial also supported the demands of Hungary and Poland.

Churchill, of course, took issue with this editorial of The Times. "In this single paragraph," Churchill wrote, "The Times gave support to the most extreme of Nazi demands, the complete cession of the Sudetenland, a demand which, if met, would have condemned Czechoslovakia to disintegration, and placed a majority of the Sudeten Germans under the grim rigors of Nazi rule." Churchill ignored the fact that the overwhelming majority of Sudeten Germans demanded annexation with Germany. That same day, the Foreign Office publically disassociated itself from Churchill.

Chamberlain requested a conference with Hitler which would also include France and Italy to make a final decision on the matter. On September 29, 1939, Hitler met at Munich with the heads of government of France, Italy, and Britain. The Czechoslovakian government was not invited. From this meeting, the Munich Agreement was signed by all present, agreeing to all of Hitler’s demands. The Agreement stipulated that the Sudetenland be ceded to Germany, effective immediately. By this act, 3.25 million Sudeten Germans then became citizens of the Reich, along with approximately 38 percent of the territory of Bohemia and Moravia. Hungary received 11,882 square kilometers of Southern Slovakia and southern Ruthenia along with their Hungarian populations, and Poland received Tesin and two minor border areas in northern Slovakia along with their Polish populations. This was accomplished peacefully, without firing a shot. British historian A.J.P. Taylor wrote: "The Munich Pact…was a triumph for all that was best and most enlightened in British life."

Chamberlain flew back to London to a hero’s welcome. As he got off the plane, he held aloft an agreement signed by Adolf Hitler which stated the German leader’s desire never to go to war with Britain again. Chamberlain proclaimed that he had secured "peace for our time." As the jubilant crowd applauded and cheered, Chamberlain expressed his desire to find a peaceful solution to the Fuhrer’s wish to create an enlarged German homeland in Europe to include all Germans. He then read a further passage in the Agreement in which Hitler stated: "We are determined to continue our efforts to remove possible sources of difference and thus to contribute to assure the peace of Europe."

It was a bloodless outcome and everything went swimmingly.

Hitler's primary goal here was to form a republic composed of all the surrounding German-speaking territories. Which is what anyone in his position would do, especially given the time period and the circumstances.

]But they broke that agreement when they occupied the rest of Czechoslovakia in 1939, even after they had secured hte German areas

Winston Churchill, quite expectedly, took the opposite view. He made a speech in the House of Commons in which he stated that the British Government, in approving the Munich Agreement, had "sustained a total and unmitigated defeat," and that "a disaster of the first magnitude has befallen Great Britain and France." Churchill had for some time called for a "Grand Alliance" between Britain, France, the United States, and the Soviet Union to "stop Hitler."

But Churchill was a war monger of the first rank, and his statements about Germany were often inaccurate or gross exaggerations, and intended only to inflame public opinion against Germany. If the cause of World War Two could be pinned on a single person, it should be pinned on him; and if not on him alone, then on him and Roosevelt. He was also an opportunist. Churchill had been an ardent anti-Bolshevist from the start and blamed the Russian Revolution and all that came after it on the Jews. But then, when it suited his purposes, he jumped on the Zionist bandwagon, stating that Zionism (which advocated the creation of a Jewish homeland in Palestine) would deflect European Jews away from social revolution to partnership with European imperialism in the Arab world.

In 1936, Churchill became associated with the informal London Jewish pressure group known as "The Focus," (of which, more in the following chapter). The purpose of The Focus was to "open the eyes of the British public to the one great menace, Nazi Germany." In reality, Germany was never a threat to Britain, and Hitler had done all he could to win Britain's friendship. The Focus became Britain's main contributor to the international Jewish propaganda campaign against Nazi Germany, and Churchill became its Gentile front man. Churchill was useful to The Focus in its campaign to destroy Hitler and the Nazis, and The Focus was useful to Churchill in bringing him back to power after years "in the wilderness," as he put it. The Focus was lavishly funded by these wealthy British Jews and Churchill, as its front man, lived a lavish life as a result. (Churchill also received an excessively large payment from the Czechoslovakian government, which cast doubt on the genuineness of his opposition to the annexation of the Sudetenland by Germany.) In his role as Gentile front man for the Focus, Churchill began berating the British government for its "blindness to the Nazi threat," and he especially went after Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain for his efforts to maintain the peace. In his articles and speeches, Churchill greatly exaggerated the extent of German rearmament and distorted the rearmament's purpose by harping on German production of heavy bombers. In fact, Germany had never focused on heavy bombers, but Churchill used this lie to support his contention that Germany intended to eventually attack Britain. Hitler wanted only peace and friendship with Britain, not war, and said so repeatedly. Moreover, Hitler had made clear that his goal was to reconstitute the German state which had been dismembered by the Versailles Treaty. That plan was no secret to anyone, including Churchill. But Churchill and his fellow alarmists treated each of Hitler's actions to fulfill that plan as a new and unexpected act of aggression, and further proof of his intent to conquer Europe. Churchill was determined that Britain would eventually go to war with Germany for his own reasons. While others worked feverishly to avoid war, Churchill and his fellow alarmists worked feverishly to bring it about. Was he deliberately channeling British power towards the service of the international Jews who were paying him through "The Focus," or was he deluding himself that he was serving England? That question will probably never be answered.

Yes, the Munich Agreement was a brilliant diplomatic move, granted again the guy had von Neurath and von Ribbentrop, two absolutely brilliant diplomats, advising him on foreign affairs.

Now explain to me how exactly the second part, when Germany outright occupied the rest of Bohemia, because that's what I'm speaking of here, and that is why the Brits and Frenchies were afraid to allow a Pole with full signing powers to be alone in a room with the German politicians.

The British publicist, F.S. Oliver, said this about Winston Churchill's character: "From his youth up, Mr. Churchill has loved with all his heart, with all his mind, with all his soul, and with all his strength, three things: war, politics and himself. He has loved war for its dangers, he loves politics for the same reason, and himself he has always loved for the knowledge that his mind is dangerous–dangerous to his enemies, dangerous to his friends, dangerous to himself. I can think of no man I have ever met who would so quickly and so bitterly eat his heart out in Paradise."

Not German.

You keep implying that Hitler wanted the entire Polish corridor when simply reading what I posted shows that he only wanted Danzig and the ability to run a highway and rail line through Poland. Seriously user, I wouldn't be surprised if you thought Hitler legitimately wanted to conquer the whole world. I also love your inclusion of any sort of backing for your argument, am I supposed to just believe you?

This shit reads like you just copied it straight out the ADL handbook on how to shill on Holla Forums. I was going to spend more time on this reply but I can't get over these sentences and take you seriously. Incredible.

On October 1, 1938, the German army marched unopposed into the Sudetenland where they were received with jubilation. Czechoslovakia was an artificial and unworkable state created by intellectuals and supported by the victors of WWI. In reality, it had no chance of succeeding, and its demise was no tragedy. The remainder of the country, left over after the Munich Agreement, began immediately to fall apart along ethnic lines. On March 14, 1939, Slovakia declared its independence, followed soon after by Carpatho-Ukraine (Ruthenia). After these areas were gone, all that remained of the former Czechoslovakia were parts of Bohemia and Moravia. The situation was an open invitation for a Communist takeover.

The overwhelming threat to Western Christian Civilization at that time was Communist revolution instigated and supported by the Soviet Union. The Jewish Bolsheviks who controlled the Soviet Union had set up the Communist International (Comintern) for the specific purpose of taking control of all of Europe. They tried taking over Germany in the revolution of 1918 but were defeated by the Freikorps. They had even succeeded for a time in establishing the Soviet Socialist Republic of Bavaria, until also brought down by the Freikorps. They took Hungary briefly in 1919 but were thrown back by forces under Nicholas Horthy. They tried taking Italy in the 1920s but were defeated and driven out by Mussolini. They started a civil war in Spain in 1936 and nearly succeeded in creating a Soviet style Communist dictatorship in that country, but with the help of Mussolini and Hitler, the devout Catholic General Francisco Franco, after three years of bloody war, defeated the Communists and drove them out of Spain. Soviet Russia stood ready with a watchful eye to create and support Communist revolution in any European country that seemed vulnerable.

Czechoslovakia's capital city, Prague, had a large Jewish population who had built an active Communist revolutionary party, ready at any time to act as the Soviet Union's fifth column to take control of what remained of the former Czechoslovakia. Hitler made it known that he would not allow this to happen. The new president of Czechoslovakia, Emil Hacha, was himself concerned about this, and wanted to meet with Hitler. Hitler invited him to Berlin for talks. When he arrived at the train station with his daughter, he was met by Foreign Minister von Ribbentrop, who had a bouquet of flowers for the daughter. Hitler had also sent a box of chocolates. During the late night meeting, Hitler harangued Hacha relentlessly, until he finally signed an agreement making his country a protectorate of Germany.

When Hitler came out of the meeting, he was ecstatic. He told his two middle-aged secretaries; "Children, quickly, give me a kiss! Quickly!" The ladies kissed him on both cheeks. Hitler said: "It is the greatest triumph of my life! I shall enter history as the greatest German of them all!"

Hitler had every reason to be satisfied with himself. So far, he had brought into Germany the Saar, Austria and the Sudetenland, and now he had made Bohemia and Moravia a protectorate. He had also essentially nullified the Versailles Treaty; and he had done it all through diplomacy, without firing a shot.

That same day, March 15, the German army moved in, meeting no resistance. On March 16, Hitler went to Prague and from the Hradcany Castle officially proclaimed that Bohemia and Moravia were now a German protectorate. Bohemia and Moravia were placed under the supervision of Reich Protector Baron Konstanin von Neurath and German officials manned government departments in a similar capacity as that of cabinet ministers. The Gestapo assumed police authority. Hitler was remarkably considerate of the existing Czech civil servants, allowing most of them to remain in their posts and permitting them to retire with pensions.

Not to have occupied Bohemia and Moravia (the remnants of the former Czechoslovakia), would have invited disaster. Germany stood as the bulwark for all of Europe against the Communist menace. Only Germany held the Communists at bay and prevented them from sweeping over Europe. A Communist takeover of Bohemia and Moravia was out of the question.

Bohemia and Moravia contained 118,000 Jews at the beginning of the German occupation, most of whom resided in Prague. When the Germans moved in, Jews were dismissed from the civil service and placed in an extralegal position. The international Jewish press, of course, reacted with an intensified outpouring of vitriolic hyperbole against the Nazis. But what should Hitler have done? World Jewry was still engaged in a "holy war" against Germany. It would have been idiotic under the circumstances for Germany to retain large numbers of Jews in the Czechoslovakian government who would surely have cooperated with the Comintern to undermine and sabotage German control. Communism was banned and Czech communists, most of whom were Jews, fled the country. Large numbers of Jews who were not overtly affiliated with the Communist Party also left.

In other news:

If you're not careful, I might pay someone to draw this idea up as softcore yaoi.

The intent of the Versailles Treaty was to reduce the size and power of Germany and to keep Germany down. Those clamoring for war with Germany on the basis of justice for Czechoslovakia were being disingenuous and were using the German occupation as a pretext for war. At the same time that the German occupation of the Sudetenland created consternation among the anti-German elements (International Jewry in particular), Poland's invasion of Cesky/Tesin in Bohemia aroused no concern whatever. These two territories of Czechoslovakia contained majority Polish populations, and Poland occupied them for the same reason Germany occupied the Sudetenland. Likewise, when, at the same time, Hungary occupied southern Slovakia, which contained a majority Hungarian population, it created hardly a stir. Yet, Germany's actions were promoted as a cause for war.

So not only was Hitler a good boy who did no wrong. No one in either England or Germany wanted war except for Winston Churchill and his gang of war mongers and the Jewish war hawks who controlled him. When Prime Minister Chamberlain returned from a meeting with Hitler, he announced to the Parliament that "there will be no war." While the people in both England and Germany were thanking God and celebrating that fortunate outcome, the scheming war mongers, including Churchill, got to work to undermine it. Inside of a week, the Jewish controlled press began smearing Chamberlain and tearing him down.

And this right here is the problem.
Harassed all night basically meant the man was threatened with war, to the point Goering threatened to carpet bomb Prague.
The guy utterly collapsed under the entire thing.
The annexation was not legitimate. Hitler was of course defending Germany's interests in the annexation, and that's perfectly understandable and I would expect nothing less. But to say that the Czechs benefited in any way is ridiculous and any impartial (ie, didn't fucking fight in the war) observer can tell you that there was no legitimacy to the annexation.

I'm sorry not everyone likes Hitler user, but some of us aren't German/Austrian or Americans super butthurt we fought a war for Jews that brought no gain. Some of us rather look at the entire event and can call shit as it is.

Hitler claimed the Poles refused the offer. They didn't, the person who was given the terms had no authority to sign them because of the issue already said with the president where he was intimidated into allowing the annexation of the remaining Czech lands.

Also, as far as that map is concerned, it's shit like that that even started this argument. While I do not agree with Warmia and Posen being German and consider that the war to recover them was not legitimate (we wouldn't be having this discussion if Hitler had started shit over Alsace-Lorraine by the way), I also find it a complete violation of ethnic rights that Silesia, and especially Pomerania, were taken from Germany just so Stalin could justify moving the Soviet border further east.

I consider it completely an attack that those Germans, and those in the Sudeteland, were moved and displaced.

But it goes both ways, and Warmia and Posen had them fallen under German rule would have seen the same thing done to its Poles.

...

No, Prussia did not join the Germany in unification, specifically separating themselves from the German confederation until the end of WW1 when the borer no longer explicitly drew the racial line, and, by extension, mid 1930s when the National Socialist party incorporated Prussia into Germany officially by means of deception; adress this. What remainded of "Prussians" (which translates to mostly mongrelized Poles) was quickly absorbed and Germanized as anything else that happened to land within the virtual, cluster fuck of a border. You could argue that the allies abolished Prussia through domino effect at the end of WW1 by incorporating it into Germany, but what prevented Germany from ressurecting the state themselves? Simple, it was never within their interest. Surely Prussia would serve as a useful extension to the Reich as opposed to just an ally, which also dyspells the myth of Germany fighting the war alone, Germany in the 40s was a federation of three countries, Germany itsself, Austria, and Prussia, but I digress.

Silesia was of much of a German state as some random Dane or French man was suddenly Prussian following annexation. If you have interest in borders you should know Germany's fixation on arbitrary documentation and faux governances (for the lack of a better term) serving more to intimate rather than to keep order , until a non German sought to simplify the organization through unification. Legality and recognition of belonging of conquered land serving mostly as tradition of legislature rather than proof of authority, why do you think Polish culture and courts still dominated those regions even after two hundred years of disappearance?

Where did I claim Silesian were Poles? They are now, but my initial point is that WE chose Poles over Germans, and that German claims to "give back Silesia or Prussia" are retarded and ignorant.

Lastly, I'm not ignoring you, but you haven't made a sugguestion of "proof".

hmmm

How invested are you in this? I really hope you put a lot of stock behind this. Please be putting a lot of stock behind this. Having my faith shaken is not something I want to have to do if you're not entirely invested in shaking my world view.

You're right. They didn't benefit from it. But no doubt they did not benefit from the Poles who came and occupied them for the same reason.

Pretty much.

In reality, Hitler had made it clear from the beginning of his chancellorship that he intended to reclaim those territories taken away from Germany by the Versailles Treaty. His plan for a single German state that would include all Germans was also made clear from the beginning. "Ein Reich, ein volk, ein fuhrer," (one country, one people, one leader) he repeated again and again. So far, he had remilitarized the Rhineland, annexed Austria, and annexed the Sudetenland – all peacefully. The majority German city of Memel had also been returned to East Prussia from Lithuania. The only remaining pieces of the puzzle were Danzig and the Polish Corridor. It was obvious that they were next on the agenda. Hitler had already made that clear. But he also renounced any claim to the provinces of Alsace and Lorraine which had been returned to France at the end of World War I. Hitler stated his plan clearly and then followed that plan, step-by-step, precisely as he said he would do. Moreover, numerous world statesmen, journalists and academics concurred with Hitler's demand for reclamation of these German territories, and declared that his demands were both reasonable and just. The Versailles Treaty was based on the "War Guilt" clause which assigned blame for starting WWI to Germany. Revisionist historians had already disproved the war guilt allegation against Germany, so there was no longer any basis for the onerous terms of the Versailles Treaty and it should have been scrapped long before Hitler was elected to office. It was simply disingenuous for Churchill, Halifax, Vansittart, and the other members of the British "war party" to characterize Hitler's moves as "aggression" or "surprises." To say that his word could not be trusted was not true.

He made Germany Great Again.

We were protecting "ethnic Poles" ;^) . Hypocrisy of krautshills never fails to impress.

I do believe you're confusing shit here my friend.
When I speak of Prussia, I'm not talking of the land, but the Kingdom of Prussia which spearheaded the German unification of 1871.

Yes, the lands of the DUCHY of Prussia were not held within that German confederation, (same for the kingdom of Hungary despite being a part of the Austrian Empire, which did have lands in the Confederation)

But I don't see how that is politically relevant to the unification of Germany or Silesia. Silesia was indeed part of the German Confederation.
Furthermore, all the lands spoken above, both the areas of the Duchy of Prussia, as well as Silesia (and Pomerania while we're at it), were part of the North German Confederation, which was the true political parent of the German Empire (same constitution basically, just incorporating the southern German states).

By the time of the 1930s and the natsocs, the Prussian lands had LONG been fully Germanized
Heck they'd been fully Germanized back when they were just a duchy under Poland, before the Brandenburg electors took control of it.


Because it didn't? Silesia was never Polish culturally. It was a mix of Czech and German. You can fucking see this in their goddamn language


No, they didn't. The Oder–Neisse line was drawn without ANY consent of the people living in that land or the Polish and German governments.
And funny story about that, originally the border post WWII was suppose to be the Oder, and in case you're unaware, that would mean the majority of Silesia would be under German control, as well as very relevantly, Stettin.


I want proof because to me it matters if I'm arguing with an actual ethnic Silesia, or a Pole that was moved in after WWII. That is relevant to this argument as it exposes the inherent bias that could be present.

...

Am I attacking Germany's right to the Sudeteland? I mean it makes for horrible borders, but I'm not fucking attacking the rights of Germany or Poland to the lands they took.

I am claiming that it's not logical to expect, that after Hitler basically got the president of the Czechs to sign his country away, that Britain would allow Poland to be put into a similar diplomatic position. And responding to that, the Germans claiming that there was refusal when there wasn't, there was a simple statement that the diplomat they got from Poland was not equipped or authorized to sign the documents presented to him.


He did the exact opposite, he repudiated the treaties that the Weimar cunts had signed that waved rights to the land.

And fun fucking fact! Had Hitler left Warmia and Posen be and instead warred the frogs over Elsaß-Lothringen, it'd be far more legitimate given the ethnic make up of the populations.

The Versailles Treaty had taken a large swath of German territory, along with its German inhabitants, to create the new sovereign state of Poland. This included a strip of land across Germany to give Poland access to the Baltic Sea, called the Polish Corridor. The main problem of the Corridor was that it split Germany in two, separating East Prussia from the rest of Germany. For Germans to travel back and forth between East Prussia and the rest of Germany, they were required to go around the Corridor by ship. They were not allowed to cross the Corridor. The German City of Danzig had also been taken from Germany and placed under the supervision of the League of Nations as a "free city" for the purpose of providing Poland with her port facilities. Around one and a half million ethnic Germans now lived as second class citizens in this Polish controlled territory.

This territory, along with its residents, had been German for centuries and its people made it clear from the start through countless mass demonstrations that they did not want to be separated from Germany. Danzig had been a member of the old Hanseatic League, and was one of the most German of German cities. It's population was 96 percent German, and in a plebiscite they voted overwhelmingly to be returned to Germany. The ethnic Germans living in this region were now a minority in a hostile Polish state, under Polish rule, and suffered the same kind of discrimination and repression that the Germans had suffered in the Sudetenland. Germany had a just claim for the return of all of the territory taken from it by force by the Versailles Treaty, and many world leaders openly acknowledged that. A prominent British authority on Germany and German affairs, William Harbutt Dawson, wrote in "Germany Under the Treaty," 1933:

"… no factor in the life of Europe today offers so grave and certain a menace to peace than the Corridor, which cuts Germany into two parts, and severs Danzig, one of the most German of cities, from the fatherland. Can Europe afford to ignore this menace and allow matters to drift? To do so would be tantamount to inviting and hastening catastrophe, for instead of improving, the conditions in the Corridor after and because of 12 years of Polish occupation, are steadily growing worse.

Because it is now abundantly clear that all the needs of Polish trade, present and future, can be satisfied without the corridor, and because good relations between Germany and Poland, which are so essential to the settlement of peace in Europe, will be impossible so long as that political monstrosity continues. The greater part of the territory should go back to the country to which it owes its civilization."

Halifax and the "war party," however, refused to acknowledge the justification of Germany's claims, and characterized each of Hitler's revanchist actions as naked aggression and proof of his intent to take over the world. They claimed that he even had designs on Britain itself. There was no basis in fact for either of these claims. President Roosevelt was at the same time, preposterously warning the American people of a possible German invasion of the United States through South America.

Poland had traditionally harbored hostile feelings towards Germany and for all German people, so Hitler proceeded with caution in attempting to settle this last territorial dispute. He was moderate in his approach and displayed considerable generosity in recognizing Polish interests. British Ambassador to Berlin, Sir Neville Henderson, acknowledged Hitler's reasonable approach. "Of all the Germans," Henderson said, " believe it or not, Hitler is the most moderate as far as Danzig and the Corridor are concerned."

On October 24, 1938, Hitler had his foreign minister, von Ribbentrop, propose the following four step plan to Polish Ambassador Lipski that would have rectified the injustices of the Versailles Treaty and which should also have eliminated all sources of friction between Poland and Germany.

1). The return of the Free City of Danzig to the Reich, but without severance of its economic ties to the Polish State. This offer would guarantee to Poland free port privileges in the city of Danzig, as well as extra-territorial access to the harbor.

2.) Germany would make no demand for the return of its former territory, now called the Polish Corridor, but Germany should be allowed to build a highway and a railroad across the Polish Corridor in order to reunite Germany with East Prussia.

3.) Mutual recognition of the location of the borders between Germany and Poland would be permanently settled. In other words, Germany would not demand return of any remaining territory ceded to Poland by the Versailles Treaty.

4.) The German-Polish Pact of 1934 would be extended from ten to twenty-five years. (In the German-Polish Pact of 1934, both countries pledged to resolve their problems through bilateral negotiations and to forgo armed conflict for a period of 10 years. The pact effectively normalized relations between Poland and Germany, which were previously strained by border disputes arising from the Treaty of Versailles.)

In his negotiations with Poland, Hitler could not have been more reasonable.

While these negotiations were going on an unfortunate event known as "Kristaslnacht" (night of broken glass) occurred in Germany which had the effect of further turning international public opinion against Germany. It could not have occurred at a worse time. The trigger for Kristalnacht was the murder of the German diplomat, Ernst vom Rath, in Paris by a young Jewish man named Herschel Grynszpan, on November 9, 1938. Grynszpan's family, along with approximately 15,000 other Jews who had entered Germany from Poland after 1914, and who were not German citizens, had been expelled out of Germany back to Poland on October 27, 1938. Seventeen year old Herschel Grynszpan, who was living in Paris with an uncle at the time, shot and killed vom Rath inside the German Embassy in revenge for the deportations, though vom Rath personally had nothing to do with it. News of the murder was in all the German papers.

Anti-Jewish feeling was already running high as a result of the Jewish "holy war" against Germany, and the German people reacted angrily over vom Rath's murder. On the nights of November 9 and 10, gangs of youths roamed through the Jewish neighborhoods breaking windows of Jewish businesses and homes and setting fire to synagogues. Uniformed SA men also participated. The official German position on these events was that these were spontaneous outbursts of angry German citizens over the murder of a German diplomat by a Jew, but the international Jewish press accused Nazi officials, specifically Goebbels, of orchestrating the event. That seems doubtful, however, because early in the morning following the Kristalnacht events, Dr. Goebbels announced in a radio broadcast that any action against Jews was strictly prohibited and warned of severe penalties for disobeying this order. Numerous people were also arrested for violence against Jews. Government and Nazi Party officials were furious over what had happened because of the negative propaganda against Germany which would obviously follow. Hitler was also furious when he first heard about it and ordered a telex message to be sent to all Gauleiter offices, which read: "By express order from the very highest authority, arson against Jewish businesses or other property must in no case and under no circumstances take place."

Unfavorable international reaction was impossible to avoid, and popular opinion of Nazi Germany declined dramatically as a result of Kristalnacht. The British historian, Martin Gilbert, himself a Jew, writes that "no event in the history of German Jews between 1933 and 1945 was so widely reported as it was happening, and the accounts from the foreign journalists working in Germany sent shock waves around the world."

The Times of London wrote at the time: "No foreign propagandist bent upon blackening Germany before the world could outdo the tale of burnings and beatings, of blackguardly assaults on defenseless and innocent people, which disgraced that country yesterday."

There was no need to exaggerate what had happened. The violent rampage against Germany's Jews was truly a disgrace. But in typical fashion, the international Jewish press did exaggerate the event out of all proportion to what actually happened, providing their usual "eye witness" accounts. An orgy of brutal beatings, rapes, and murder of large numbers of innocent Jews all across Germany, as well as extensive damage to Jewish property was alleged. These exaggerated reports had the effect of poisoning international public opinion against Germany, as they were intended to do. Yet, it makes no sense that the German government or the Nazi Party could have orchestrated this pogrom, as the negative publicity resulting from it hurt Germany and the Nazis far more than it did the Jews. Already sensitive to the hysterical anti-Nazi propaganda campaign being waged against them, German officials were being very careful not to create incidents, such as Kristalnacht, for which they could be criticized further. It is more likely that Kristalnacht was a spontaneous pogrom against the Jews, caused by the buildup of hostility over the International Jewish "holy" war against Germany, and triggered by the vom Rath murder.

In the aftermath of Kristalnacht, the world press became overwhelmingly sympathetic to the Jews, and bitterly hostile towards Germany. In France, Britain and the United States, calls for war against Germany became increasingly bellicose as a result of Kristalnacht.

...

Danzig or the corridor?
Danzig most definitely, but the corridor had been in German hands for about 103 years before it was given to the Poles. I guess if we factor in the time between the first partition and the loss of the territory during Napoleon's war on Prussia, that'd be like 150 years or so

On January 5, 1939, Poland's Foreign Minister, Josef Beck, met with Hitler at Berchtesgaden. Hitler reiterated to Beck a clear and definite guarantee that Germany would make no claims on the Polish Corridor, and reaffirmed that he only wanted to build a railroad and a highway across it. The following day, January 6th, in a meeting with Polish officials in Munich, von Ribbentrop confirmed Germany's willingness to guarantee, not only the Corridor, but all Polish territory. This friendly, generous offer was repeated again by von Ribbentrop during a state visit to Warsaw on January 23, 1939. During this state visit von Ribbentrop appealed for a final all-inclusive settlement of German-Polish territorial points of contention.

A settlement in accord with the "four points" outlined above would have taken nothing away from Poland. Danzig was not a Polish city, but a "free city," supervised by the League of Nations. Germany's four point offer would have permitted Poland to continue to use Danzig's port facilities, as before. Germany did not demand a return of its lost territory, now known as the Polish Corridor, only the right to build a highway and a railroad across it in order to reconnect with East Prussia. There was nothing unreasonable in Germany's demands.

Yet, on March 21, 1939 French President LeBrun and British Prime Minister Chamberlain met in London and proposed a French-British-Polish alliance to contain Germany. This proposal was then sent on to Polish officials, which had the effect of further steeling their resistance to Hitler's demands. Despite Germany's best diplomatic efforts, the Poles were now refusing to concede anything.


The popular view today is that an overwhelmingly powerful Germany was threatening and intimidating a weak and impotent Poland, but in reality, that was hardly the case. Poland had a long military tradition and maintained a powerful, well trained army. The Polish army had only recently (1920) defeated the Russian "Red" army. Polish military leaders were not in the least intimidated by the power of Germany. It should be remembered that German armed forces had been reduced to only 100,000 men by the Versailles Treaty, and that Germany at the time of the crisis with Poland was still in the process of rebuilding her military forces. Not only was Poland not intimidated by Germany, she was even belligerent.

Whilst I hate Churchill vehemently for his actions to my country and how he sold us out so much. I believe that he, deep down, respected the German Nat Soc nation. But his hands were forced by his own greed and the kikes that fuelled that greed. And it cost us an Empire.

I'm talking about the Czechs, please keep up. Hitler did so to the Czech president.

He WANTED to do it to a Polish representative. Not saying he'd have succeeded mind, but the problem here is that when they couldn't pull the same stunt (because to begin with the Poles didn't send a guy that could sign any agreement bilaterally), they presented the offer knowing the guy wouldn't have the ability to sign it, and then claimed it was rejection of the terms.

He has a great work ethic and is an all-round based guy in his private life, totes.

Time to change your opinion.

I love this accent. The low sample audio rate gives it an aged quality, like it's being played back on old sound equipment.

The Coventry bit is arguable. He was already in the war and at the hands of the Jews by that point.

I'm talking around the 20/30's when Hitler was rising to power. Churchill's statements about Hitler show a very contrasting picture to the late 30's/40's.


I did actually just read about half of Irvings book on Nuremberg. it's shameful how early they were already planning to de-nazify Germany and destroy the German Identity. Even in 41/42.

Brits are the first choice, who, in turn, still have some bargaining clout.
They might have lost a chunk of their empire, but they still have a little bit of diplomatic power left.
Plus, the Jerry is the eternal enemy, according to doctrines and all that.

Man, I must have a truly based ISP, then, cause I can watch this, no problem.
Along with many other "blocked" ones.

Stories like this is why we will keep on making oscar b8 WWII films forever, and ever, and ever.

Which only ended up fetishising the stereotypical Nazi officer, complete with monocle, cigarette holder, arch aristocratic manner, impeccable uniform, erect, arrogant bearing, and an evil sneer or a sinister smile on his haughty face.

How unreasonable of them to harbour hostile feelings for a people who had wiped out their country and tried to exterminate their culture

You mean jews or Soviets jews?

And nowadays Poles dislike Germans in a whole new way! They have to deal with them as, eeugh, tourists! Those walking wallets that just throw money at them to stay in their hotels, eat their dairy and buy their cosmetics. Germany is a great trade partner that way.

I guess these days there's a lot of political tension in Poland, what with the unspoken werewolf problem that the government refuses to address with any long-term solution, aside from putting the country in lockdown. They typically eat about 25-lbs. of uncooked, preferably fresh, human flesh each day. We don't talk about it much so as not to frighten off the German tourists. We need that GerMoney real bad.

I think that you are failing to interpret this as Poles, whether through their own choice or not, having surreptitiously outsourced Jew removal to German expertise.

What?

Brits couldn't do shit, and they're Brexiting, so there isn't any will to do so by their government and peoples.

Russia and Austria were just as guilty of this and yet I never see such feelings there.
Further, Poland was not innocent. Before the Commonwealth's decline in the 18th century, it had long been a place on the German areas, especially Brandenburg.

Which is why it's clear. History is fucked and neither Poland nor Germany are 100% guilty or innocent. But the specific annexations of Pomerania and Silesia were unjust.

Much like your quads, my explanation was very self-explanatory.

What did he mean by this?

Okay, I'll make some statements, and we'll see where we disagree.

When he came to power in 1930, Germany was in a deep economic slump. The German people were still carrying the heavy disgrace of their defeat in World War I. They were suffering both physically and emotionally.

True or false? Elaborate?

Hitler's socialist Nazi party promised a better economic life and the possibility of a re-glorified Germany. The promise of a better life was more attractive than their harsh and hopeless reality. The German people opened their arms and embraced him.

True or false? Elaborate?

Hitler delivered his promise. He brought Germany out of economic depression and went on to unite the German-speaking world. In 1938 he was at the top. According to some historians, if Hitler had died in 1938, he would be universally renowned as one of the greatest statesman in the history of Germany.

True or false? Elaborate?

After 1938, where do you think he "went wrong" or acted in a way that is "morally reprehensible"?

Catherine the Great was a German


Germans

We're talking about the 18th century, there was history before 1933

Hmm indeed.

I'm talking about on the whole, not just WWII specifically. On the whole, both Poland and Germany (or rather, the German kingdoms) did a lot of harm to each other.

I'll give you the Austrians, but come on now. Don't be a faggot and claim that just because Catherine was German that means the blame shouldn't be ascribed to the Russians.
That's like saying us Portuguese shouldn't hate Spaniards because the king that took us over was a Habsburg.

Poland has Hungarian and Serbian werewolves that prey on the populace. This isn't some kind of metaphor about ethnicities, this is just the migration patterns of the monsters. Basic firearm training has risen in light of the recent string of attacks.


Okay, we'll start in the 9th century and work our way forward.

If you wanna be serious about that, basically Pomerania became German sometime in the 9th-12th century
Silesia remained in contention between the Bohemians (who were part of the HRE) and the Piast lead Poles until the last Piast king died in the 14th century. Silesia then became a permanent part of the HRE and of the Bohemian crown, and slowly saw German settlement.

Eventually Habsburgs got it, then Prussia, and once Prussia got it, the settling was increased and that formed the basic cultural and ethnic meld of West Slav/German you saw up until WWI

Concerning Pomerania, it remained ethnically German, changed hands between having their own duchy, being sworn to the elector of Brandenburg (latter Prussia), even had the Swedes in there for a while! But ethnically and culturally, it was German.

As far as Prussia was concerned, the entire Baltic was Teutonic and was heavily settled by Germans, to the point of even up to WWII, there was a significant number of nobles and traders in that area, especially in Riga.
Prussia, specifically Konigsberg and Danzig, were also heavily German and thus formed the basis for what later became east Prussia.

Meanwhile though, Warmia became west Prussia, taken after the first partition, and Posen was annexed as well. But both of these were never as heavily settled and remained majority Polish (although Warmia was settled more than Posen).

Doesn't have the same effect.
Too much blue just reminds people of the ocean.
Symbols highlighted in red just come across as something telling you that an error has occurred, or that something has stopped.

This new scheme looks like a coconut strawberry swastika muffin floating in the ocean, like someone dropped it out of their boat on a trip out to go fishing. Has no power behind it.

The original plays on humans attraction to the color red. It blasts red in your face, and then calms you down with neutral unsaturated tones for the point of focus.

It is just the complete version of the german national anthem.
The BRD leavse the first 2 verses out.

It was the actual flag of the national socialist party of Canada in the 1930s, not something I made up. The blue represented the province where the leadership came from (Quebec) and the red was meant to be the traditional Canadian red given by the crown. The party's ideals were to have an equal union between both peoples, Arcand believed strongly in it, he was against Quebec nationalism and strongly for pan-Canadian nationalism, with both sides working for all of Canda's interest. I do get your point though, I far prefer the original NSDAP flag, it did strike more to the eye.

Isn't it ironic that, despite losing the war, Hitler still managed to influence the last 70 years? Everything in the West is done after considering what Hitler would do in any situation.

Did he inspire pride in his people? Well, I guess Germans should hate themselves and not procreate or racemix.
Did he want Germany to prioritize its German nationals? Fuck it, Turks and Arabs, come on in.
Did he dislike Jews and prohibited them from holding any positions of power? Let's give our entire country for them to run.

That picture is really funny.

That is my point exactly, the German confederation was very clearly and specifically sesperate from the country of Prussia. It only ever became a "provinence of a unified Germany" after illegal absorption, Infact, the opposite is true, which only demonstrates your lack of knowledge in this subject.

> They had been Germanfied LONG before
They weren't even Germanified when the land was leased to Teutonic arch kikes for a hundred years. Just like Corats are more Germanic yet adopted Slavic and just like Balts are Slavs yet speak their own Central Europe was as much of a linguistic mess as it was on a map, especially considering all the official theocratic kikes took orders from the Holy Roman Empire which in turn took orders from the Vatican. The initial order had Latin listed as one of their main languages for crying outloud, German only ever became official once Poland was partitioned after Germanics turned on us (who would've guessed) after we fought off Turks from sieging Vienna, after a German duke found a loop hole which barely legally made him the heir to the throne of Prussia, before German became the official language, just before Berlin became the capital after Koingsberg, who the Teutons under "Royal Prussia" recognized it as Polish land with Polish inhabitants, without stating minor languages and populations. It was all in paper, and when I speak of "Polish courts and culture dominating" I'm speaking in "occupied" Poland as a whole. Who ever draws the map decides, and if all four big game players all agree red is green then it is so. Later only to "disappear" again once Germany demonstrates its military prowess in the big game of sneak attacks, bravo.

Let me repeat again, Silesia was clearly its own, and when presented with the option chose Poland.
Populated with Germans

Silesia should be a part of Poland because we fought for it you fucking dumbass, not because we "once ruled it" , the fucking excuse YOU'RE making you illiterate third world faggot. Keep on fellating yourself and your non state the border keeps thinning mongrel.

No, you didn't. You had it handed to you by the Soviets so they could justify taking land that was ACTUALLY yours.


Let me spell this out for you.

THE GERMAN CONFEDERATION WAS NOT THE PREDECESSOR TO THE GERMAN EMPIRE, WHICH WAS THE FIRST UNITED GERMAN STATE. THE NORTH GERMAN CONFEDERATION, WHICH IS NOT THE SAME ENTITY, WAS THE PREDECESSOR AND THIS ONE INCLUDED THE LANDS OF EAST PRUSSIA

Is this clear enough?


Yes, it was. It was Germanized then and it was Germanized further as it remained in Teutonic and later Hohenzollern hands. I'm not just talking culturally. I'm talking straight up fucking ethnically. It wasn't just Slav/Saxon mongrels. It was just straight up Saxons who chose to call themselves Prussian


It's funny you should mention that because a lot of the actions taken by the Teutons was never sanctioned by the Emperor and perhaps even more amusingly, the Emperor (almost always a Habsburg), often had a common enemy in the Prussians as the 17th and 18th century rolled around.


Siege of Vienna was 16th century. Partition of Poland was 18th century.


Yeah no. The Polish king recognized the right of the Hohenzollern's to the Prussian duchy, and they didn't just hand them the right to proclaim the duchy a separate land. The Hohenzollern's of Brandenburg won that right by participating along with Poland in the Northern Wars against Sweden, as was in fact his duty since while they were an Elector of the HRE, the Hohenzollerns were also subject to Poland BECAUSE THEY WERE THE DUKES OF PRUSSIA.

All this shit with Prussia (again, the kingdom, not the duchy) turning on Poland only ever came about during old Fritz time when he saw you were going to be dismantled anyway.

It's very important to draw a line between the Prussian/Brandenburg Germans and the Austrian Germans in this matter, because the German Empire was formed by those same Prussian Germans.
It's also important to remember that the Prussians held deep animosity for the Poles because at their darkest hour of the Napoleonic invasion of their land, Poles basically sided with Napoleon.

You clearly have no understanding of history and you're conflating a great and many things, but the ultimate point of this, that you can not fucking deny, and even the most limp wristed SJW will agree. Silesia was not given a choice between Poland and Germany. Neither were the Poles or the Germans asked what they wanted. Lines were drawn based on the Oder and latter Oder-Neisse so as to allow the Soviets to basically annex most of the eastern parts of what was once Poland, and rather than be angry at the Soviets you chose to focus on anti-kraut propaganda because you're the same type of braindead idiot as the Scots that seriously think MUH BRITAIN IS RULED BY ENGLAND, when they had the most cultural influence in forming the British identity AND THEIR FUCKING MONARCH RULES THE UNION.

tl;dr:

Shut the fuck up and go to /his/ and learn your shit.

...

That's a good casus belli. I imagine Russia feels the same about Poland today. It is not Polish clay but merely populated by Poles. A minor inconvenience. Then once they have conquered Poland they can say "it should be a part of Russia because we fought for it." It's hard to find a nationalist Pole without a persecution complex as a part of his national identity. It's hard to find a German without a guilt complex just the same. What a sad situation. We can go further and further back in history until the claim on your land is rendered null. We can do this with any nation. Usually this means debating territorial borders with a nationalist is useless because they won't concede any part of their claimed ancestral ground which is why we discuss these things with primary regard to the ethics of the actions of Germany and the other European powers during WWII.


This is a very snug image.

Misleading title. I thought he sung the Horst Wessels Lied. Now I'm disappointed.

Russia feels the same way about Ukraine because they willingly made themselves the subject of the Russian Empire once, correct. Same situation, yet we never lost Silesia since, never will.

O i am laffin, no shit, and I bet we can also go far back enough to trace which tribe you split up from kike.

You never won it either! You have zero claims to Silesia! Absolutely fucking none!
It wasn't given to you. The Silesians didn't chose you. It wasn't even YOUR fucking decision or demand.

We're not discussing Warmia and Posen. We're not even discussing fucking Danzig.
We're discussing Silesia and Pomerania! Clearly German lands at the time of WWII taken from them for the sole purpose of allowing Stalin to annex eastern Poland!

To be clear here, all I'm doing is discussing things as valid claims at the time of the annexation, but I'm not suggesting these lands be returned.

That boat has sailed, damage done.

But it creates an issue that Poland is not willing to recognize a mistake was made, nor extend an apology for that, and Germany has to be saddled with losing so much of it's ethnic land as a "war guilt" situation. It creates a situation where no Pole or German that pride themselves in their blood and in their land can ever work together towards a common goal, such as for example gassing kikes and killing Muslims.

That is not what I said. I was referring to etiquette. "It should be ours because it used to be and we took it back since" is very appealing to your people but it's useless to us in a greater forum. As the other user is talking about regarding Germanization and Teutonic colonization, we can go back in time to render your argument null or we can go back in time to render their argument null which is why we talk about claims differently when not among our own folk. I would not advocate for the ethnic cleansing of large portions of Poland, France or Czech lands to restore the old German clay for example. Also you clearly misunderstood my jab about Russia. They would be totally unjustified in taking Polish lands today, clearly.


I think a lot of the Poles have their healthy patriotism unmolested which means they aren't forced to address the kosher elements of it. Though I suppose Poles don't care so much if what benefits them is also terribly unjust from an objective perspective. That's nationalism after all, if a bit too jingoist for my taste. I don't understand the lack of Polish care for the eastern areas they lost though. Most of the Polish nationalists I've listened to talk about the lands they lost/ took from the Germans and postwar redress rather than Belarus.

The anthem has no nazi background. The first verse is only not sung in Germany because of our guilt cult.

That hasn't been my experience, but then my family are from Kresy.

I find that Polish nationalists are also on average much more redpilled on the JQ than even right-wing Western Euros or Burgers. Poles just have a natural antipathy towards Jews, even bluepills don't like them

I too found this image amusing

Fair enough. It could just be my lack of exposure. I'll try to broaden my understanding of Polish nationalism.

Germany and Poland threads get heated user, I'm done with the shit flinging
Random Holla Forums fact I found for your time that's not worth it's own thread, did you know the inventor and manufacturer of Toblerone, Theodor Tobler, was present at the court date ruling the authenticity of "Protocols to the Elders of Zion" as a witness about Freemasonry? It is called the Berne Trial.

and Belorussians will try to join us as to avoid Russian influence and join the remenants of the EU. Hopefully if Trumps disbands NATO and we form local military alliances instead this move will be tolerated. GiB clay.

I think you may be right about most Poles, but it depends on who you are speaking with. Modern Polish nationalism essentially follows from Dmowski, who was more interested in a homogenous Poland confined to the old Piast territories, instead of Pilsudski, who had a vision of a Poland like the Commonwealth where Poles dominated a union of various different peoples

I don't want to ruin your day but they started singing the 3rd stanza as a sign of "protest"

I hope your being ironic

checked, don't even pretend you know what's going on if you haven't lurked for at least two years.

State propaganda in all it's fucking glory.

that picture is exploitable

Nazi?
This is fucking Deutschland Uber Alles. The NatSoc anthem was Horst Wessel Lied aka "Die Fahne Hoch".

Fucking leftists shitting on everything German.

starting to understand "if you kill your enemies, they win"

only in the sense that the truly aware will see how right they were. by doing the exact opposite of what Hitler would have done, to the detriment of Germany, they're showing what he was fighting to prevent.

It just takes a certain awareness to see it, an awareness that most don't have. however, more people are starting to see it, as we delve deeper into degeneracy.

it represents eternity. the cyclical nature of our existence.

It's not banned you fucking idiot.
It's protected by the greedom of speech and art or whatever you call it.
It's 50 years of propaganda that led to the fucking BELIEF that it's banned.
Go fuck yourself for spreading propaganda, scholmo.

It's not the 90's anymore user, we are way passed the 50 year mark.

Like all things, it is often arbitrary, inconsistent, and frequently involves home cooked pierogi.

Please stop quoting Hellsing for how long it has been since WWII. This isn't like with dinosaurs where you can just keep saying 65 million years ago.

It was an easier time with communism forced down Poland's throat. You walked into a shop and looked at things… then walked right out. There was none of this complicated "choosing" business. But as you know, in any world where capitalism exists, you will want to leave the commie one to sell your ass for blue jeans and coca cola.

Then came this hyper-aggressive capitalism, which when introduced, the bureaucrats dismantled state owned services and fobbed it off to foreigners, leaving the common folk stranded with a wreked nation. So the very same people who said, "Capatalism is evil, goy! Be happy with the shoelaces you have!" were the same ones to stab the common folk in the back and ruin their lives with capitalism right immediately afterwards.

It was so bad that people thought back on how much better it was under the commie system. You at least had a house and job. Not much, but at least you had something rather than nothing. Not much though, but something. I mean, at least it was something.

...

...

This thread…
One of the worst things might be US-American Nationalists who admire Hitler.
Hitler fucking hated the USA. Rightfully.

"The Germanic inhabitant of the American continent, who has remained racially pure and unmixed, rose to be master of the continent; he will remain the master as long as he does not fall a victim to defilement of the blood," said Hitler.

All of those ancestors are cucks who left behind their Vaterland.
No respect for them.

And by the way, this is what Hitler also said:

"America, he told a group of visiting generals in the fall of 1937, was “A country without cultural foundations required of civilized societies. One Beethoven symphony contains more culture then America has produced in her whole history”. "

0/10

He is right here though

Hitler mentions discusses not only "the European-but the gigantic scientific-technical achievements of Europe and America; that is, of Aryan peoples."


Well he did say that "I openly confess that even in the pre-War period I would have thought it sounder if Germany, renouncing her senseless colonial policy and renouncing her merchant marine and war fleet, had concluded an alliance with England against Russia, thus passing from a feeble global policy to a determined European policy of territorial acquisition on the continent." Which was to address the insolent threat of the pan-Slavic Russia.

"One blood demands one Reich. Never will the German nation possess the moral right to engage in colonial politics until, at least, it embraces its own sons within a single state. Only when the Reich borders include the very last German, but can no longer guarantee his daily bread, will the moral right to acquire foreign soil arise from the distress of our own people. Their sword will become our plow, and from the tears of war the daily bread of future generations will grow. And so this little city on the border seems to me the symbol of a great mission. And in another respect as insignificant place had the distinction of being immortalized in the annals at least of German history, for it was the scene of a tragic catastrophe which gripped the entire German nation," said Herr Hitler.

Shlohmoh thinks that if it is Syrians who leave their country instead of fighting it's the worst kind of betrayal they could've possibly done to their land making them basically scum, but if it's a German who does the same it magically is okay.

Then why is Horst Wessel Lied, Erika, etc. banned?

Germans going to America didn't have gibs but go on making an ass out of yourself, I wont stop you.

The 5. amendment of the Grundgesetz is pretty vage:
Art. 5

(1) Jeder hat das Recht, seine Meinung in Wort, Schrift und Bild frei zu äußern und zu verbreiten und sich aus allgemein zugänglichen Quellen ungehindert zu unterrichten. Die Pressefreiheit und die Freiheit der Berichterstattung durch Rundfunk und Film werden gewährleistet. Eine Zensur findet nicht statt.

(2) Diese Rechte finden ihre Schranken in den Vorschriften der allgemeinen Gesetze, den gesetzlichen Bestimmungen zum Schutze der Jugend und in dem Recht der persönlichen Ehre.

(3) Kunst und Wissenschaft, Forschung und Lehre sind frei. Die Freiheit der Lehre entbindet nicht von der Treue zur Verfassung.

TL:DR as long as you are pro german goverment you can say what you want, if you are against it they can put you in prison.

Rapefugees. Not even once.

Somalians come in, get gibs and accomidation. They say they had to escape the harshness of their country. But they still go back and visit their country for holidays.

Exactly. They have to wait and white it out like everyone else.

Those quotes you give in that second part of your post are desperate attempts of excusing being a cuck who leaves their Vaterland behind.
If you are a racially pure person born in your original heritages country, then you are supposed to stay there. If you leave, you betray your land and all your ancestors. You're almost as bad as the Syrians nowadays.

Assuming you are an US-American nationalist with German ancestors: You are being a nationalist for a country that fought against your own people and your ancestors were men who did betray their own country, who were the exact opposite of a nationalist.

And even if it is women and children:
Why would you let them into your country?

That's why I said "almost". Obviously you still won't be a muslim and have a culture and race that shitty.
But you are still a fucking cuck who betrayed his own country and people to move to a country that fought YOUR people and country. That's as cuck as you can become.

Which is exactly what Hitler is saying in that quote! If you read further on in what he says in Mein Kamp, he does not intend or shows great reluctance early on to establish colonies anywhere with their own armies, because they may form their own separate identities as their own distinct people and become an enemy!

Did you actually read this?

Germanization was simply an attempt to make the Pole civilized. They were backwards subsistence farmers back in the day and needed to join the civilized world.

He's only here to sow division, hide and ignore.

Okay then, even if thats a fact… It also is a fact that it was those exact Germans who migrated from Germany to the USA who then later FOUGHT Germany and the Germans.
Sorry, but there is no way to excuse that.

Not only did they leave behind their Vaterland but they even fought it.

>that cross-eyed fuck actually practiced this

This happened relatively recently when some sporting event accidentally played the Borat-version of the Kazakhstan national anthem. The look on the athlete's face is something to behold as she writhes in embarrassed rage.

Original's better. more elegant, more punch, more absurd & lower effort.

>actual suggestion to make it a law was first noted in 1972 thanks to the DDR that's were the lying about it being banned starts

Go fuck yourself, kike.
I'm sick of your fucking revisonim.

Sorry. I assumed we were talking about when the war ended. Once after work, I heard people talking about WWII uncharacteristically, and the end date cropped up in conversation, and they were decades off, for some reason. In hindsight I thought it was a rather funny reason.

I never knew how much I needed something… but I needed this. And it really helps contextualise this.

We had kangz and sheet. What even iz diz?

Makes you realize the beauty that was destroyed.

This is what Polen thinks that word means.

Since when is it wrong to say your country is the best? Jeez dude.
Ze Juden really did a number on them. I wonder if theres any hope for this cuck

That's a tough question. I mean, I'm currently going through the German Disney film dubs for the songs, because they're being rated very highly. I've yet to see anything that is German that is overrated. German things are rated according to their correct system specifications. Germans are known for their high precision engineering standards, pharmacology, physics courses, etc.

...

Viscount Rothermere stated, "He has a supreme intellect. I have known only two other men to whom I could apply such distinction – Lord Northcliffe and Lloyd George. If one puts a question to Hitler, he gives an immediate, brilliant clear answer. There is no human being living whose promise on important matters I would trust more readily."

Many remarked with similar sentiments.

Your description of him can be filed under the bullshit category:

To the Marxists, the most old-fashioned of all critics, he was simply a pawn, the creature of a dying capitalism in its last stages. Others have seen him as a 'charlatan' profiting by a series of accidents, a 'consummate actor' and 'hypocrite', or a 'sly, cheating peasant'. Even Sir Lewis Namier endorses an account of him given by a disgusted German official as a mere 'illiterate, illogical, unsystematic bluffer'. Even Bullock seems content to regard him as a 'diabolical adventurer', animated solely by an 'unlimited lust for power'. Trevor-Roper insists that these are not explanations, but evasions - negative labels that explain nothing. In dismay he asks, 'Could a mere adventurer, a shifty, scatterbrained charlatan, have done what Hitler did, who, starting from nothing nearly conquered the whole world?'

As I said, the bullshit category.

Bizarrely, some historians – mainly Jews or their sympathisers – seriously hold that any attempt to explain Hitler is 'immoral'. These historians insist that Hitler must forever remain a mystery, and that history must never attempt to explain him. Any explanation is considered, reports Rosenbaum, 'dangerous, forbidden, a transgression of near biblical proportion'. Rosenbaum also suggests that historians are unable to find any narrative into which Hitler fits, or any new theory to explain him.

Perhaps. I wont deny I dislike Hitler for his stifling of the general staff and of officers like von Rundstedt, von Bock, von Manstein, Guderian and others. I'm not speaking of course of those that were conspiring to murder him, but rather those that were better military thinkers and did not betray him, not even entertained the thoughts (at least publicly or in a serious fashion), and yet were ignored or punished career wise because they refused to follow Hitler's orders or commands, which as far as warfare goes were wholly misguided.

I also dislike how he allowed Himmler and Goering to utterly destroy the carers of von Blomberg and von Fritz, who were men utterly devoted to the causes he defended, even if they again disagreed with his rash pursuit of them.

Also his killings of men like Ernst Rohm and Kurt von Schleicher (admittedly the Night of the Long Knives was a clustferfuck)

But ultimately my greatest grieving with him was the utter disregard for the German empire's history as a Prussian lead nation, his disrespect for the Kaiser and unwillingness to reinstate him, and his treatment of the general staff that was the true reason Germany was able to not only survive the Weimar republic, but also come back stronger and ready for another war. To me it seems Hitler was given a war machine of Prussian build and decided it was okay to disregard Prussian importance in favor of a pan-German approach, which was everything the German empire was not.

To tl;dr, my grievances with him are perhaps out of a persona bias towards Prussia as far as German history and culture are concerned. I wont claim that objectively, he wasn't a force for good, far from it. I just think he wasn't an entirely morally just man.

It's really ironic that. Hitler stressed being against the whole "parliamentary process" and micromanaging everyone. (As he experienced in part politic.) If someone was assigned a job, then it was because they were trusted to be capable of doing it. If someone was made treasurer, minister of this, head of the depart of whatever, then getting together as a group to vote over decisions concerning each person's job was, in his mind, an utter waste of time. They should only turn up for meetings concerning themselves. Otherwise it was, as said, a waste of their time.

Some of the major economic decisions didn't even come from people within his core in-group because they were, as he recognised, utter rubbish with their proposed ideas, and so he had to turn to one of the opposing groups. This would have been after he was made chancellor but before parliament was burned down.

He has regrets over decisions, no doubt like any person. What those might be we will never know now. As for some regrets, we know from second hand accounts, like his speeches.

Setting this song to repeat was a mistake. The melody is just too grandiose. I'm FEELING the patriotism.

But the thing he he micromanaged the fuck out of Barbarossa, to the point he made himself his own chief of staff.

I know he specifically didn't regret von Blomberg, although he was cross as fuck over von Fritz.

I also know he never intended to return the Hohenzollerns to power.

We call this hypocrisy. You hit middle-age and start being overbearing in the workplace, burning the candle at both ends. Classic managerial issues.

We had the same thing happen here with K. R. Kept himself cheerful and pleasent in the public space, but would chastise others for not working as hard or as long as him in private, and apprently had quite the temper.

Exactly. You can see theyre singing a different anthem. Retards actually believe that Normie germans would have national pride….

Because Hitler is love. He did nothing wrong. My world view is dependent on Nice Hitler being an uncontested fact!

...

...

The Liberal's remarks.

The USA is different from normal European countries, it is an colonial, imperial construct. It is no „nation“ in the original sense, it has not a native population, it is not even the Fatherland of the Indians.
Going into the world, occupying new land has always been part of the Germanic people.

The thing with the USA is, with WWI she became an sworn enemy of Germany and the German people. Even an enemy of the German people in the USA who made a big part of the population. Germans in the USA were forced to deny their heritage, all traces of Germany, German culture, were extinguished, libraries destroyed, musical culture destroyed, German associations forbidden. What is left of German culture in the USA is either carefully camouflaged suppressing and denying it's German origin or a pitiful poor caricature.


It this were true, then the Germans would still live on Crimea, instead they made Europe.


There was no choice for them, neither for the Irish, or do you think they were eager to fight on behalf of their English oppressors?

There was no alternative.


Even on modern maps of Poland it is easily visible which parts are stolen from Germany and which are Polish.


Teutonic Knights were a great Catholic order you uncivilized heathen.
The Germans taught you everything, even how to make bricks and how to govern a city, check for Stadtrecht, without them you would still live in mud huts.

Sticks and mud huts! There was also straw… I remember it like it was 800ish AD, or 900ish AD.

Which year? These borders keep shifting like the ocean shoreline. You have Poles living so far west that can't outwardly be distinguished from Germans until they start speaking in that rustling language. "Tze, t'ch, sh'tch".

Historically, the Germans were often a great blessing to the lands they settled–either in Germania proper, or as settlers/immigrants to other lands, often invited in by other nations and principalities in the East due to their tremendous work ethic, and stoic nature, as is the case with the Volga-Germans, essentially turning and transforming Imperial Russia into an agricultural superpower within one generation of their arrival. Let's not forget as well that so much of the Russian upper-classes, civil servants, and nobility were Germanic as well, with Czar Nicholas himself and his wife, (Alix of Hesse, were born in Germany), being a grandson of Queen Victoria and a cousin of King George, both being first cousins of Kaiser Wilhelm.

It's good to keep good humor, user. I like you.


Does this mean the Toblerone is an edible, potent symbol of German nationalism?

But my stepfather is a 72 year old gun owner who turned up with all the other gun owners when the old PM showed up in a Kevlar vest to tell them shit about guns, despite them all being responsible gun owners. And the vest would not have done him any good, because as anyone would have known about Auzzie gun owners, if they actually shoot before, they would have just aimed for the head.

But you can still become a member of the rifle association and pistol club. But the restrictions on guns is damn dreadful. I don't know how the laws differ from state to state, but you can't keep as many guns at home, and you have to keep them locked up. (There's a record on how many you own and what not. With restrictions on what you can own.) You can still make bows and crossbows. (At least I think so. So long as you don't keep any of the bows and bolts about.) It's not like they'll stop you from making a slingshot.

I don't know if the laws are more lax if you were a judge at club, or if it's about making it harder now to newly acquiring them. But the gun laws are a load of crap anyway. Look at Switzerland. Every household has to have a gun by law. Crime rate is near-nil. No one is game enough to start shit when all the neighbours are armed. The Swiss have no standing army, so everyone above a certain age needs basic firearms training.

It'd be nice to have zero-net immigration so that we can catch up with the building of infrastructure, including hospitals where there are huge waiting queues, and also pay off some of our debt, so that all who reside in Australia can be looked after.

In an ideal world we would welcome people who come here from abroad, become Australian Citizens and give their loyalty to this country. Australians embrace music, food, dance and the art of other cultures but to be truly (((multicultural))) means to also take on other people's complete way of life, including laws. Many other Australians will never embrace Sharia Law, child marriage, and general cuntines or other parts of cultures which are incompatible with the Australian way of life. In Australia, we have our own culture which values freedom, human rights and… social drinking. Our message to those migrating to Australia is to come here, leave your wars behind, give Australia your loyalty and contribute to the country so that future generations will have a safe country to live in, with many opportunities to have a fulfilling life. Or just fuck off back to where you came from. In fact, don't come here at all. We're full.

Many Australians have seen what has happened in Europe and especially Britain, where there are now Sharia Law courts and Islamic enclaves where police will not enter. We do not want to see that happening in Australia; everyone has a right to feel safe, it doesn’t matter which country you came from or what religion you follow.

Australia doesn't have an "anti-immigration" attitude; we feel for the true refugees throughout the world who have had to flee their homes due to war, however we have many Australians who need help such as our homeless and returned soldiers. It is our responsibility to look after Australians first and then others if we have the funds and resources to do so. So ideally: fuck off.

Although, the rise of right-wing populism sure looks like fun times. How far we go and what policies are passed is something we shall have to see. We might close down the country tighter than the UK if we have to.

I mean, you might not know this, but you do realise that 90% of those refugees get eventually accepted anyway when the government quietly stops literally wasting time and processes their visas, right? It's literally just wasting tens of millions of dollars (because they keep having to relocate the centres to countries when they realise Australia's government will pay nearly any price to keep the scary refugees away) that has taken from social services that keep precious white people alive and fed, as well as adding to the massive budget blowout. (That is somehow still Labor's fault even when they've been out of power for half a decade)

Sure as hell not doing us any favours. So we're as cucked as Europe.

I'm beggining to see the beak here. Even in our very own Aussie backyard, 4 out of 5 of Australia's richest families are Jewish, as are 6 out of 10 of our wealthiest individuals. So what exactly do these elite Jews do with the disproportionately huge amount of wealth and influence they have built up over the years?

For starters, former Australian Foreign Affairs minister Premier Bob Carr already exposed the influence of the Israeli lobby which functions within our political arena. The Zionist Federation of Australia and the Australian/Israeli Jewish Affairs Council are backed by very influential and wealthy Jews, many who are committed to furthering the Zionist agenda abroad, be it the illegal occupation of Palestinian territories, or using Australian political influence to support Neoconservative imperialism around the globe.

The result of these lobby groups have caused Aussie soldiers to unnecessarily die while fighting for Israel and America's interests in the Middle East, as well as making us a target to various groups around the world who we would otherwise have no conflict with at all. All this international manipulation comes from a tiny minority that makes up less than 0.3% of Australia's population, so we have every right to state these facts, regardless of hard they cry 'antisemitism'.

Nice Hitler is canon.

So, user. When did you find out how amazing Hitler was? I got into it in early 2016. But it started off gradually over the years with all the WWII-laden imagery that they don't ever stop playing.

...

When I was a young boy, I was often rather shy and quiet but I lit up when people played with me and so on. As the years went on I continued to drift away because those around me kept disappearing into some other world, leaving me to play with my self, apart from the crowds of other kids. I found comfort in RPGs, fantasy stories about saving the princess, and so on. That was my world. As I got older I began to resent "reality" and people in general. This feeling fermented for years until I was filled with hatred for everything. Now I realize that I'm scared of the good things in life; a fear of love, a fear of fame, a fear of success, (etc.), because these things have all been degenerated in the "real" world. Love is no longer about the honourable warrior saving the princess, it's about fucking a hole and semen splattering all over the place; fame is no longer about great deeds or accomplishments in fields that benefit humanity, it's about shaking your ass and reading a script you didn't write; success is no longer victory in destiny and dreams but who can make the most shekels or own the fastest car in the neighbourhood.

These days I need to repeat a mantra in my head: never fear love. Yes, I have to remind myself of something like that. Hitler may have had this phase too, especially in his 20s and perhaps early 30s, and he chose not the path of the iron fist but the steel gauntlet; tempered, functional, artistic, and most importantly: you can take it off at any time to caress your loved one.

...

Isn't that from the film, "

What is the context of this? What are they supposedly celebrating?

...

You have a much greater grasp of our political situation than I. It's an interesting development that I know far more of Europe and America and their history than I know of our own country but I don't regret my interest because it's brought me here after all.


I'll be honest, I can't remember. I think it was 2014 but it may have been earlier or later. I don't know how folks speak so authoritatively on the origin of such and such meme or image macro because the years I've spent on the chans are a blur to me (when did 'griefing' in video games become 'trolling' and when did the old memes and jokes stop being cool?? I can't remember.)

But yes, of course, the terrible trauma of WWII inflicted upon the entire world. Once you become redpilled, it's truly astonishing the deluge of references and quips and remarks you will encounter in social life, media and eveywhere else about the second world war, Hitler or the Nazis. I don't think a day has gone by (when I'm not in solitude) where I haven't heard at least one thing.

Their greatest mistake was allowing young boys to play as the Germans in video games. The way the Reich is depicted in all fiction or "non-fiction" really. They always give the German faction or soldiers such a potent aura of power and masculinity, something that is taboo now, so naturally when we seek these things out there is that old association. I learned more playing strategy games than I did in history class. A truly despicable situation. Maybe they shouldn't have half the curriculum telling us of the virtues of foreigners and the sins of the colonials if they want us to grow up to be wholesome kosher boys?

The total suppression of racialism and that unrepentant, ridiculous veneration of tolerance as some kind of commandment is probably the greatest key to my redpilling. They shouldn't have relied so much upon that one word; Tolerance with a captial T, because after a few sardonic quotes, genuine real world experiences and crime statistics, I just thought to tolerate horrible things was weak and pathetic. Thus all the garbage they'd filled me with, associated with that word was undone like a twisted mess falling neatly in place.

Hitler was a prophet. The German people will be free, strong and healthy again, Hitler will be vindicated and the allied countries will redeem themselves. I can feel it in my bones. A great, sweeping change is coming.

reason number 6712 to hate this guy

It only makes sense. I mean, granted, most of the TV shows in Oz are syndicated programming from the BBC and America. Our original programming line-up is mostly low-budget reality TV and liberal news programming. So that just goes to show why we only ever talk about what goes on around the rest of the globe rather than our own dustbin and occasionally chilly backyard.


This! You are not going to stop kids from liking the so-called "bad guys" when you make them out to be so damn awesome. No, instead you always have that one kid who somehow can name all the different tanks and planes in WWI and II, but you're assured he is no autist! – And you can bet that there is some kind of interest in weapon development that has probably crossed the line to fetishist.

nobody can stay mad at Hitler for long

But Hitler can be mad at you.

Your post has articulated a lot of my own pain. Never fear love, user. Embrace love!
Beautifully put. You talked about the perversion of romantic love but today love means something different as well. Servile altruism, frailty and unrestrained, false compassion. A lot of modern nationalists and Holla Forums will reject love, believing true love to be the weakness that has led to our terrible suffering. They welcome the hatred they feel; Kai Murros' great speech about hate being the exemplar of this. What they don't realize is that love can make you more of a monster than hate alone could ever accomplish.

Not to mention if Holla Forums has it's revenge, it will make even the cartoon villain Hitler look like a saint. They should spend their hollywood shekels on depicting Holla Forums as a terrible evil rather than this kind, old Austrian painter.

...

archive.org/details/HitlerMangaVolume1inEnglish

Piss off, Jew.

Damn, they don't have the rest of it posted online. The nips illustrate him well in this, they actually capture in his countenance the eyes which were so outstanding IRL that one didn't notice anything else. Adolf is just one of those people whose appearance was so completely dominated by the eyes.

rarehistoricalphotos.com/rare-color-photo-adolf-hitler-shows-true-eye-color-date-unknown/
And in the record where it says that his occupation was a painter, and that his hair was brown, directly underneath in the same writing it has it written that his eye were brown. So which is it, brown or blue? Or did they colour up the old photographs by hand, adding the blue to the eyes because they didn't know themselves, and the people mentioning that his eyes were blue were people who never actually met him, much like how disproportionately large number of people in Auschwitz all came up with stories of having intimate encounters with the infamous Dr. Mengele?

Wouldn't he get arrested in modern germany?

He awakens in modern day Germany terminator style with a terrible headache. (The last thing he remembers is shooting himself.) When he encounters people, no one believes he is Hitler. They think he is a committed improv actor, and just go with it. Hijinks ensues!

But the one guy that tried to make money off of him realises from the camera footage recovered off of the incident where he stumbles from where he originally materialised that he is in fact the real Hitler, and that he intends to "Do what Hitler does" but in modern day Germany, and has to stop him!

The confrontation speech is one of the best moments of the film as Hitler addresses a big elephant in the room. The approval he got in the past and even the approval he got from some people during his shenanigans in the future. How he had risen to power in the first place. How he was merely giving the people what they wanted, fulfilling their denied desires, their denied self-described best interests. He would not have come to power had there not been major opposition, which is to say, without the people being partly complicit he would not have been able to lead the nation in the first place!

But there is a scene earlier where a guy in a public square comments how it is a sad day in Germany where "someone can openly walk the streets of Germany with full impunity", or something along those lines.

didn't he sing the entire official german anthem but people got butthurt that he sung all verses?
hell the nazi anthem wasn't even this.
this is literally the history german anthem, without JUST nazi connotations

You're free to own Mein Kamp in Germany. A printing company has been printing off pozzed annotated versions that have sold out many times recently that they'v needed to keep making more print runs. With what's been going on with Germany as of late, no one should be surprised. Certain (((people))) insist that it's simply a case of intense resurgence in scholarly interest in history.

Do you remember hearing about this monster Holocaust for years? Even now you probably all remember all the stories kids were told at elementary school about what the ruthless Nazis did to those poor persecuted Jews during the terrible Holocaust! – The six gorrillian, you have to remember them, goyim!

It's crazy how similar all our lives have been to lead us to this point together. I've never felt alone since I found this board and realized just how many people have felt the same feels I have even though they may be a world away.

Get this civic nationalist bullshit out of here. Go back to 4/pol/, faggot.