How the fuck can the wealth represented by trillions of American Dollars be "earned" by individuals. How can millions be "needed" by any of them? The Philantropy Capitalists show is always for the ego boost and always wasted through inefficiency.
To the capital slaves that make excuses for their masters, kill youtself because you spout the ramblings of the defeated.
We hear this all the time. "Self made" as if these people just woke up homeless orphans then fucked off to business school while waitering and digging ditches just to get by. However whenever this is investigated the terms for "self made" and all similar statements fall short of "all by themselves" These people always have either unusually stable family lifestyles, great inheritances, or have had huge financial and educational boost in their early life. Money is certainly not the objective here. That won't solve any problems. Government just taxing people won't fix shit. In fact it will exacerbate this problem by dividing those rich enough to skip the hurdles and those not quite as much.
Even those so called self made people. There is too much land and assets in the hands of people that has been gained or concentrated at the cost of lives and injustices.
Beyond all these issues we must never forget the politicians that sit atop the waves of social upheaval and play any side that looks like it has an upperhand. That is why you fellow Anons, those who seek real justice and a future for all to enjoy the fruits of this earth, can never forgive the politicians.
Austin Diaz
...
Jason Bell
up
Noah Diaz
good post
Daniel Hall
Holla Forums here. I need a good reason this is a problem beyond muh unfair. I agree that it is but 'it's just wrong' doesn't cut it.
Anthony Diaz
Wealth disparity breeds more wealth disparity. The wider the gap, the worse most people are – and the lees power they have to lift from poverty.
Zachary Brooks
dont worry my dude im sure if you work hard enough you'll get to the 1% it's all a matter of believing the dream
Luis Rivera
I get this. But it is usually met with 'even today's poor are a million times better off than they would have been 100 years ago'.
Wyatt Bell
It's because they accumulate this wealth by making deals with the government to put regulations so that small firms won't be able to compete and when for the government to give you lots of money for when you end up bankrupt.
Jacob Anderson
They only got that money by making other people work for them.
You can only have rich people by making other people poor.
Connor Torres
The real problem with disparity is that wealth is power. When a small segment of the population has so much power they wield it to undermine the rights of the rest of the population for their own benefit.
Thomas Cooper
thanks Holla Forums
Easton Smith
Nae. Was just looking for a reason beyond 'it feels unfair'.
Ian James
That's the equivalent of "why do you ever get sad about anything whah about the kids in Africa."
It's bad because the rich get that way by being parasites on the lower classes
Daniel Rogers
I know it's bad. I just need a way to make this case objectively. The best I can come up with is f it keeps going as is eventually the have-not crowd won't even have enough to buy their trinkets and the economy will crash. There must be a stronger case against it though.
Christopher Clark
Listen, I don't want to sound like some BS librul that just wants everyone to just "get along", but killing those fuckers just because you hate them is not good practice. When you take away all their monetary powers and set them on the same level again as the rest of us, you've essentially done enough. If they still find a way to fund an army and rally against you, then it becomes ok to kill them as a matter of self defence. But just killing them all, even if they wouldn't fight after you took their MoP, would just mean a whole lot of bad PR. No, I'm not advocating for morality, muh feels or not breaking the eggs for our omelette. I'm just trying to say that if you gonna systematically execute a bunch of people, porky elsewhere has more arguments against the cause.
Yes, it sucks. Yes, they'd deserve it. But, when you could also just take their power away, there's no real point in it except to vent your hate. Nothing wrong with wanting to vent hate, but try to remember that normies generally don't like public executions anymore.
Luis Fisher
ok pollack the good reason this is a problem goes like this you ask yourself why is this happening? now if you are a free market libertarian and you want to believe good things you would think, everyone must be making good money so those who own businesses and have many monies at their disposal are able to make much more money right? but this is income only - we know for a fact that capital gains and other types of "income" that are usually not considered "income" are even larger, so how is this happening is also good to ask and when we look at all the figures, we see inflation and we look at unemployment, and we realize that if much of the population is on average not employed at all times, while the incomes they have access to are stagnant and the cost of living is rising due to the dollar buying less ( prices for essentials like food rising ) then they are getting poorer now if we were in a free market theoretically and the prices were dropping due to a good economy and competition then incomes being stagnant wouldn't be a big problem in fact even incomes dropping would still make it possible to buy more with less but we are not in a free market corporations are getting bailouts when they fail and selling poor products of low quality and their guarantees are often made good "for a fee" so you dont actually get your money back or the product replaced at no cost also governments are garbage and taxing people more this is of course not considering many other things like healthcare, poor public education getting poorer, and property ownership factors so this is a problem because some people are playing poker but cant lose because when they do they just use government to bail them out a good summary of this is that there is socialism for the rich but capitalism for the poor which means getting from lower income to middle and then upper income is not something most people can do youd have to be in perfect health, never get major injuries or get struck by feats of nature - a dozen people making it from provable poverty to actual wealth doesnt disprove the statistics either fyi
Lincoln Watson
woah my fbi friend please do not give these kinds of suggestions we know you are full of shit and trying to get people to do criminal activities to get them jailed
Brody Fisher
to look for single factor answers in a massive scale problem like this is to ask unanswerable questions - so if you're seeking an answer to this that does not involve many factors in society you aren't looking for an answer at all
Isaiah Nelson
that statement is hard to prove 100 years ago you didnt need a gym membership because you worked around your own property and property taxes were miniscule because you didnt have "on the grid" electricity and sewage etc
