BLOGPOST IN THIS THREAD ONLY FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPLAINING A SITUATION YOU NEED HELP FOR
Useful resources
>>>/polarchive/ - it contains many useful guides for when SHTF and for everyday life. Also, cool stuff, like gorilla warfare, epic haxing and d0xx1ng, OPsec, how to be a nurse and more, check it out it's super cool I swear!!!
>>>/fit/ - classical board, full of autists like you but with good physiques. Read the sticky, it often is enough to answer to 90% of your questions.
>>>/polblog/ - since you are probably a faggot, it would be useful to spew your dramas here instead of keeping it for yourself or leaking them when they are not needed.
Athletic contests (and combats of all kinds) have a powerful
influence in moulding for the better, the personnel of all participants
therein. He who must meet worthy antagonists face-to-face and defeat
them or be himself defeated, ennobles his own mentality — unconsciously.
Courage, coolness, intrepidity, purity of blood, the mental balance, are the
athlete’s first requisites. He must therefore be individualistic, self-reliant
and calmly resourceful; i.e. he must be brave.
The brave man is ever generous, frank, outspoken, dauntless. His
brow is open — his step fearless and firm — his bearing self-poised,
leonine. He looks at you without a tremor — sums you up at a glance, and
in business affairs, his ‘word of honor’ is more binding than a Shylock’s
sealed bond. He may not be an erudite philosopher — a profound scholar
— nor an eminent elocutionist — (nor be troubled over much with the
‘saving’ of his soul) but he is more than all that — H E IS A M AN . Hence,
everywhere he is first favorite, especially with the feminine gender —
whose sexual instincts are as true to Nature as the needle is to the pole.
What a tremendous difference is noticeable, between the self-
contained bearing of the bronzed soldier; and the creeping suavity of the
chalky-skinned shopkeeper — the vileness of the Hebrew money-lender
— the sweet milk-and-honeyness of the venomous pastor — the base
obsequiousness of the lean hireling — the boorishness of the ungainly
peasant — and the fat sleek cunning of the tax-eating political?