>CEO tears

JUST

...

Absolutely dogmatic

Bourgies are like selfish children, OP. This is just a great example of it.

Hey rebel kierkegaard is still a faggot, just sayin

I hope you kids realise that bourgeois refers to the middle class and not the ultra rich. You do realise this, correct?

You bunch of losers would never even reach the level of achievements these people have. Clearly, if you believe that "uhh hurr da bourgesoeie r ruling us" then maybe there would be a reason they 'lost'?
Did that ever cross your mind?

They bet on Windows Phone, the cucks.

Nope, middle class are petit-bourgeois.

the 17 hundreds called, they want their class system back.

Then what are rich CEOs?

Yeah, if you aren't living in a mud hut and dying of cholera you are part of the problem.

...

this
only african tribes know true communism

Oh, ultra rich bourgeoisie, please tell me more about the unfairness of the market.

...

=( yyyyyy

...

Jason Unruhe pls go

i still use a Nokia E72 to this day, they're the best phones ever made, period.

LEL!
microshit survives purely on patent threats and FUD.
They are egg heads that literally can't do anything right. Allying with them is one of the most stupid things anyone can do.

It's funny how hating Microsoft is now seen as cliched and puerile when they deserve it more than ever. They are one of the biggest companies on the fucking planet and can't make a better operating system than hobbyists.

Apple is worse.

Jobs was way worse than Gates, yet nerds have always hated on Gates while sucking off Jobs.

C'mon.
Sometimes they do.

Apple is dying, though, and has seen far more hate from tech nerds than you can imagine. It can't survive without Jobs' used car salesman leadership.

Microsoft only exists because people literally need their products, but the nuances of tech design are lost on the legal system.

ecksdee

aw I actually liked nokia products. A shame they exploited workers to make it though.

No, bourgeois refers to those who gain money primarily through property rights and investment, as opposed to those who sell their labor to an employer, the proletariat.

...

>>>Holla Forums
>>>/cuteboys/

>>>/faggot/

Sometimes they do sure. Usually they don't. Especially pétit bourgies. The thing about capitalism is that most of it is really just a combination of a number of forces and components that on their own may not be particularly destructive, but create a deadly synthesis. That's why people get so up in arms against socialism, they just see us trying to stop processes that they don't see any harm in, something like voluntary exchange or small business, they are unable to see the bigger picture and how these forces interact with each other.

lol

FYI petite bourgeoisie are typically worse than the blurgeoisie proper. The idea that there's any nobility to that class is the product of American "Cult of the Entrepreneur" propaganda.

whenever I see your posts I think of your boypucci.

Having worked for a small business, I beg to differ.
Those people can be equally awful. I also think that the bourgeoisie have been getting bolder in the absence of any real accountability.

The difference between bourgeoise and proletariat is the difference between working for a wage and paying one; it has nothing to do with values.

...

...

Literally every single one of nokia's competitors is also a corporation owned by porky. Less competition within a capitalist market leads to even more terrible side effects of capitalism (crony capitalism, collusion). So this is actually terrible for all of us

...

This tbh

Might buy it anyways on the hope that they'll be able to go through with the STEP2 after the Neo900. Smartphones are such absolute fucking shit.

it's almost like you don't even understand how capitalism works or why some absolute idealists believe austrian economics is valid

protip: it's not, and this is why