Do you agree with the creator of Binding of Isaac that Pulp Fiction was too difficult to understand?

Do you agree with the creator of Binding of Isaac that Pulp Fiction was too difficult to understand?

When did Edmund McMillen changed his name?

There's nothing to understand in Pulp Fiction.

Glaiel is friends with McMillen and did work on one of his games, but it wasn't BoI.

and nobody's making fun of the fag?

These are the type of people that call the few good actresses shit

...

Is this Holla Forumskino?

out of order editing is shit tier editing

I thought seeing an article about adding the ability to skip boss fights in video games would be the stupidest thing I'd see this week, but apparently even removing the gameplay from a game to make it in to a literal movie is not enough, because even some fucking movies, with no interactivity whatsoever, are too difficult to understand.
Jesus fucking christ…

Unironically this. It’s a fun flick. Nothing more.

There's like two parts that occur out of order in any way that matters.

never seen it lol

If it were edited perfectly sequentially, Pulp Fiction would be a much more boring movie than it is. That's not to say that non-sequential editing inherently makes movies better, but if the movie doesn't have much of substance to convey, it could be a good tactic to obfuscate the vapidity and still make for an enjoyable movie.

...

this

manipulating a story by telling it out of chronological order indicates your story is fucking garbage and can't stand on its own

the plot of pulp fiction is tarantino is a pretentious asshole

He's obviously making fun of the RPS article and all the "easy mode" talk going around lately, you fucking mongoloids.

...

And yet he makes easymode trash. Funny ain't it.

JLH is a jew? and why does that guy look so much like Ted Cruz?

No, it's below even flicks. It's a joint.

...

retarded maymay

It's pulp.