Are any of you actually involved in non-violent anti-capitalist actions, programs, media actions, work etc???

Are any of you actually involved in non-violent anti-capitalist actions, programs, media actions, work etc???

praxis seems almost completely missing from this board, and therefore things are not even half-marxist.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=GWh-J_mvYSE
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Well you have any suggestions? At this point the option is to either join a SocDem bourgeois party and subvert it from the inside or travel to a 3rd world shithole that has a legit chance of revolution.

lol

My IWW chapter is organizing around a lot of local labor struggles, so I help with that (although there is no campaign in my own workplace. Yet.)

I also end up participating in a lot of the PSL's programs (mostly marches and reading groups). I'm not a party member, nor am I a Marxist-Leninist but they have a big influence in my city and I think they're pretty solid. Just keep one eye peeled and you probably won't get kronstadted ;)

youtube.com/watch?v=GWh-J_mvYSE

I'm doing both with Puerto Rico and the B████crats. :^)

Also I do agree with OP that nonviolence is the solution. Violent revolution has traditionally only been successful when it's a reactionary revolution to invasion, change, etc. which isn't the case in the West.

you do not talk about that stuff

hell, why not try to direct a socdem party in a certain direction without outing yourself?

There is also a lot of local news, or national news, or publicly owned media especially that is Always 'liberal-progressive' but never pro-worker or anti-capitalism that I think would be ideal for infiltration if you want to participate in a non-violent 'war of position' in the superstructure.

I make videos.

Daily reminder that it is possible to reform the whole economic system within the system itself. Nobody with any economic position dependent on the ownership of the means of production would resist their equipment being reformed to the ownership of its employers.

...

Nonviolence is a spook

...

Channel name pls?

Oliver Stone, who claims that Soviet Union single-handed beated the Nazis, am I right?

I can't wait to see what the likes of xexizy muke or rebel getting into a violent revolution will be like. Will these skinny or fat bourgeois faggots get murdered by the fascists? I bet yes.

Non-violence is literally the only option available right now unless you want to have COINTELPRO murdering you instead of breaking you up with feminists.

I'm part of a local commie student group that campaigns for various causes. Going to help organize a student strike in November to protest tuition hikes.

wow it's fucking nothing.

>>>/gulag/

The Khmer Rouge was started by students fam. Also more and more Uni students are working class, I know plenty. On top of all that there's no reason why you can't be bourgeois and and a socialist. See Marx, Engels, Mao, etc.

And that turned out REAL well, right??

How are feminists going to break you up? We're already a fractured group, from the difference of interests involved in various waves, to TERFs, to those who do and don't agree with MRAs, and so on. Either you're trying to make yourself look weak by being scared of feminists, or you haven't been paying attention…

The Khmer Rouge didn't, but I was just making a point about how just because something is a traditionally bourgeois institution that it can still be revolutionary. Besides, students have been a major part of basically every major subversive or revolutionary social movement.

It was a reference to idpolers, you piece of shit. I can't believe you aren't banned yet either. Your kind are just a cancerous no matter how you try to spin your ideology as long as it includes this disgusting identity it will destroy the left.

This is possibly the dumbest thing I've read all week, like you are just that ignorant of history.

They parrot the Big Union talking points and think they're all academic with it.

Don't be retarded, that's not what I meant.
I meant against the state. As long as there's a capitalist state a violent revolution isn't going anywhere.

Anti-feminists are pretty idpol themselves, but I digress, whatever (wouldn't be worth it to talk to you about feminism, getting you triggered, showing your obstinacy, et c). I'm not banned because I contribute plenty to this board without scapegoating, without getting into pissing contests, or however you want to call this what you're doing.

Typical.

It isn't about being anti, it is again about having it at all. It is already equal at its core and nothing else needs to be brought up. You are the deadly mold on all of leftism.

Kek. Ironic you would try to pull that card 'cause let's not forget that this whole thing started because you were saying the left is a victim of feminism. Even now you're still saying so without giving anything as evidence nor in the way of argument. Instead you're stamping your shoes and trying to get mud on everyone else.

And socialism isn't about equality, silly liberal. Equality is an exclusively political notion, and, as a political value, it is a distinctively bourgeois. Far from being a value that can be used to thwart class oppression, Marx even thinks the idea of equality is actually a vehicle for class oppression, and something quite distinct from the communist goal of the abolition of class (Engels too).

"The idea of socialist society as the realm of equality is a one-sided French idea resting upon upon the old 'liberty, equality, fraternity'—an idea which was justified as stage of development in its own time and place but which, like all the one-sided ideas of the earlier socialist schools, should now be overcome, for it produces only confusion in people's heads and more precise modes of presentation of the matter have been found."

...

Alright, tell us about the very tough and radical revolutionary activities you were part of. I'm sure there are many.

What a great sentence