How are you *supposed* to handle disabilities?

I know people in abusive situations that have little to nonexistent means of escape. When talking about these issues some pundits inevitably say "you should respond to emotional abuse with physical abuse," not quite understanding the depths of depravity sociopathic and psychopathic "caregivers" will go to if met with such situations. In a few cases, the people involved are life-dependent on prescription medication and don't have the realistic option of "going homeless" to escape abuse.

How are we supposed to handle this subclass of "would work if able" people?

I'm not sure what you are asking, to be honest.

How should we make sure people that need care are not taken advantage of?

With a bullet.

Typical tankie response. lol.

I don't think there is anything in Marxism or orthodox socialism that says anything about what we should do with the disabled. Karl Marx is a man who knocked up his maid and kicked her out onto the street. I'm not going to assume he is a champion of the disabled and unemployable because he probably isn't. He probably considers us all filthy lumpens even if we're class-conscious. Marxism is about abolishing private property. Ensuring that labour is compensated fully for their labour and doesn't have to share any of its value with "owners". Marx never said that the workers should be forced to financially support the disabled or the unemployable.

This is why it's fucking retarded when autistic unemployables like myself have to hear from leftists that they are on our team. Yet they look down on us because we rely on working people (I'm not on welfare. I rely on my dad. My dad is retired but he worked for many decades and has a company pension) to sustain us. The only people who are going to be able to speak for autists and unemployables are autists and unemployables. Hence why I want to make a political run in 2-3 years. We can't rely on socialists to speak for us.

Transhumanism

The reason why we have identity politics in 2016 is because there isn't one big-tent leftist movement that speaks for every single individual person.

I don't fit in with Holla Forums because there is a lot of hostility towards NEETs here and they don't understand that social and sexual deprivation (>tfw no gf) is harmful to the human psyche. There is no outlet for robots. No VR/robot waifus. No state subsidized prostitutes. And Holla Forums doesn't understand our economic concerns regarding immigration (driving down wages, taking our jobs). I grew up in a first-world country and I would like our society to remain first-world thank you very much.

And /r9k/ is a fucking crab basket. If you got laid at all, you are shunned. If you have a girlfriend, virgins on there will tell you that your girlfriend is ugly and that the reason why they are a virgin is because they have higher standards than you.

And Holla Forums has their head up their ass with this white power shit and corporatism. They are a bunch of classcucks who get hard when dominated by a strongman.

And autistic communities like wrongplanet would probably not very supportive of my anti-captialism rhetoric. And they are definitely not supportive of anti-feminism rhetoric, which they interpret as woman hater. Even though feminism is making life for autistic men a living sexless hell.

Identity politics are just a way to divide and conquer otherwise unified fronts.

Identity politics doesn't divide and conquer. People turn to identity politics because they don't feel like they fit in with these broader leftist fronts.

Hell tbh I don't feel like I fit in anywhere. People suck. You have to pretend to be somebody else and conform in order to fit in. I have the tendency to post on boards because I want to promote awareness of certain issues. But I find that most people are either set in their thinking and can't be persuaded (so you are either preaching to their choir or you're not getting anywhere). Or they just don't fucking care. We live in a 140 character world (twitter) and a micro-blogging world (Tumblr). People are fucking retards who just wanna plonk down in front of the TV, watch Netflix, look at social media on their smartphone. And people buy these "positive thinking" self-help books and do yoga. "Everything is awesome". I fucking hate this society. Sometimes I just wanna get my hands on an AK-47 and a bomb vest and join ISIS and just gun down all the normals in a blaze of glory.

This

Community Service Announcement: Don't respond to reformists. They are nothing but crypto-capitalists.

...

Reformists actually want to get shit done. Unlike armchair socialists who talk of revolution but they don't even fucking do anything. They keep working their cuck jobs, study their theory and talk socialism behind a computer screen on some internet board.

And reformists are just useful idiots unwittingly working against their own interests and constantly apologizing for their masters

There is ZERO revolutionary potential in the first-world. People are so classcucked out of their fucking minds here. They are too tired from their stressed out wagecuck lives that they just plonk themselves down in front of the TV or their smartphone screen, on Twitter, on Facebook, on Tinder having casual sex with Chad, on Whatsapp, watching Netflix, whatever the fuck. Let's go buy some self-help "positive thinking" book. Let's go buy the Secret. Let's go read 50 Shades of Grey. Let's go read Eat, Love, Pray. Let's go to Lululemon to buy some yoga pants and do hot yoga later. Let's go to the cupcake shop.

We are a brain dead apolitical, apathetic society.

Fuck it all. Fuck this world. Maybe I should switch to the Anarcho-Nihilist flag at this point.

Reformists want to make things better for the working-class. Even if it's incremental improvements. It's something. Armchair socialists are doing NOTHING. We have ZERO revolutionary potential in the first-world. See here

Most people are fucking idiots. Cowardly cuckolds who don't want to rock the boat. Pick up a gun and go fucking do your revolution if you call yourselves revolutionary.

Getting in to a shooting war is exactly what they want you to do; it's the only way governments know how to fight and win.

We need means of getting people off of welfare and in to the economy.

And how do you propose that in a society in which Porky is downsizing more and more by the day due to automation and outsourcing?

...

- What exactly are you doing to build conditions for people to eventually pick up guns? lol
- Protests don't accomplish shit if the workers go back to work like good little cucks because they gotta eat. Workers have no leverage.
- Forming unions?! Seriously? Don't make me laugh. Union membership is down, not up from the 70s. Labour unions are effectively impotent in 2016.

I suggest that socialists read "The Precariat" by Professor Guy Standing if they want to understand why labour organization/unions are impotent in 2016 (he wrote the first book in 2011 but it applies even more today than then).

All you pretentious "revolution or death" snobs do is read your NINETEENTH CENTURY theory and apply that outdated bullshit to 2016.

Professor Guy Standing was also right on the mark about how the ivory tower socialists, the third-way socdems and the unions would do nothing to sway the precariat (therefore they are all effectively impotent. The only thing unions give a shit about is jealously guarding the pay and benefits of their own existing members. They aren't interested in expansion. They're too afraid of losing what they already have to bother with expansion). And that the precariat would inevitably shift to the far-right.

Guy Standing successfully predicted the rise of Donald Trump 5-6 years before it happened. lol.

Doesn't a union presuppose that the business can't just move overseas with minimal cost?

It's precisely because businesses can just move overseas with minimal cost (depends on the scale and nature of the business of course) that unions largely cower these days. Unions do their little protests. Like those union workers in Indiana working at Carrier. But ultimately didn't Carrier relocate their factory to Mexico anyway?

Unions in 2016 are largely in the business of trying to get the best deal that they can for their current members while making lots of concessions with regards to the pay and benefits of their new members. And often times they are willing to freeze or even scale back pay/benefits for senior members if the company is threatening to pull out of the area.

My uncle works for the post office. And the union threatened a strike recently. My uncle didn't want them to go on strike because he's a senior member with a nice grandfathered deal with the post office. Whereas postal workers who joined the union before a certain date are left with a shittier deal.

Generally the more seniority you have, the more you get. And that's fine. But the deals are structured now so that no matter how much seniority you accrue, you can never earn as much as senior union workers used to earn at that company (the workers with the old grandfathered deals)