Accept the ultimate red pill. Evolution doesn't exist. How can blind beings begin to develop eyesight...

Accept the ultimate red pill. Evolution doesn't exist. How can blind beings begin to develop eyesight, how can beings that reproduce asexually begin to mate, how can a being that came off an egg give live birth? The illusion of it is given by DEVOLUTION.
It's a one-way street. The dire wolf devolved into the wolf, which in turn devolved into the dog.

reuters.com/article/us-athletics-manthropology-interview-idUSTRE59D0BR20091014

"If you're reading this then you – or the male you have bought it for – are the worst man in history.

"No ifs, no buts – the worst man, period…As a class we are in fact the sorriest cohort of masculine Homo sapiens to ever walk the planet."

Delving into a wide range of source material McAllister finds evidence he believes proves that modern man is inferior to his predecessors in, among other fields, the basic Olympic athletics disciplines of running and jumping.

His conclusions about the speed of Australian aboriginals 20,000 years ago are based on a set of footprints, preserved in a fossilized claypan lake bed, of six men chasing prey.

FLEET-FOOTED ABORIGINALS

An analysis of the footsteps of one of the men, dubbed T8, shows he reached speeds of 37 kph on a soft, muddy lake edge. Bolt, by comparison, reached a top speed of 42 kph during his then world 100 meters record of 9.69 seconds at last year's Beijing Olympics.

In an interview in the English university town of Cambridge where he was temporarily resident, McAllister said that, with modern training, spiked shoes and rubberized tracks, aboriginal hunters might have reached speeds of 45 kph.

"We can assume they are running close to their maximum if they are chasing an animal," he said.

"But if they can do that speed of 37 kph on very soft ground I suspect there is a strong chance they would have outdone Usain Bolt if they had all the advantages that he does.

"We can tell that T8 is accelerating toward the end of his tracks."

McAllister said it was probable that any number of T8's contemporaries could have run as fast.

"We have to remember too how incredibly rare these fossilizations are," he said. "What are the odds that you would get the fastest runner in Australia at that particular time in that particular place in such a way that was going to be preserved?"

Turning to the high jump, McAllister said photographs taken by a German anthropologist showed young men jumping heights of up to 2.52 meters in the early years of last century.

STARK DECLINE

"It was an initiation ritual, everybody had to do it. They had to be able to jump their own height to progress to manhood," he said.

"It was something they did all the time and they lived very active lives from a very early age. They developed very phenomenal abilities in jumping. They were jumping from boyhood onwards to prove themselves."

McAllister said a Neanderthal woman had 10 percent more muscle bulk than modern European man. Trained to capacity she would have reached 90 percent of Schwarzenegger's bulk at his peak in the 1970s.

"But because of the quirk of her physiology, with a much shorter lower arm, she would slam him to the table without a problem," he said.

Manthropology abounds with other examples:

* Roman legions completed more than one-and-a-half marathons a day carrying more than half their body weight in equipment.

* Athens employed 30,000 rowers who could all exceed the achievements of modern oarsmen.

* Australian aboriginals threw a hardwood spear 110 meters or more (the current world javelin record is 98.48).

Other urls found in this thread:

vault-co.blogspot.com/2015/05/an-old-painting-of-neanderthals-before.html
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3072094/40-000-year-old-bracelet-believed-oldest-suggests-ancient-humans-used-drills.html
youtube.com/watch?v=sEIPgCggui4
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Trips confirm!

"These conceptions were drawn in the fifties because there was widespread knowledge of the Neanderthal skulls that had been found in the 1920's and 1930's and what are being called Denisovan skulls today. Scientists began to realize back then that Neanderthals were fully developed human beings barely distinguishable from modern people. Fragments of skull found by German anthropologists in the 1930's showed the same faces that people like me have today.

Notice the dog in the woman's lap. Of course, the Neanderthal caves were filled with the bones of dogs. Sixty years later, they tell people the reason there were dog bones in Neanderthal caves is that the Neanderthals must have been eating them. They claim the same for all the bones of horses there and the bones of cows. They claim that horse skeletons found in a line outside a Neanderthal cave (clearly tied off to a hitching rail) were all slaughtered and eaten and then had their bones laid out in neat rows assembled like they had simply perished there. The humans actually believe this stuff. You wouldn't think anybody would buy that story but … the humans believe it.

If you asked an anthropologist in 1954 when modern looking Neanderthals had been found he'd laugh and say everybody knew they had found them in Amud in 1925 during excavations there. After Israel got control over the site, official history books were issued claiming the Tokyo archaeologists were the first on the scene in 1961 and no previous digs had taken place there. What happened to the skulls all displayed in science books in the 1940's? Israel removed them from public view after the end of the second World War and they were never seen again. Today, if you ask to see the Amud skulls, they show you a picture of something that looks like a baboon."

Anti Eugenics Jewish-Catholics GTFO

Whites are Superior Cro-Magnon, user

Forgot source: vault-co.blogspot.com/2015/05/an-old-painting-of-neanderthals-before.html

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3072094/40-000-year-old-bracelet-believed-oldest-suggests-ancient-humans-used-drills.html

Accept this into your mouth.

*whips out dick*

youtube.com/watch?v=sEIPgCggui4

Same type of situation that draws moths to a flame would be my understanding.

Self hatred like that pisses me off

All these were allowed to happen by the interglacial period, the end of the Pleistocene which lasted from about 2,588,000 to 11,700 years ago.

Light sensitive chemical enters cell randomly, cell gets agitated around light and tries to avoid it, it just so happens that light carries radiation that deconstructs DNA, cells with this light sensitive chemical are more likely to survive, cells with this chemical become more and dominant because of this.

Do you even 7th grade?

Interglacial period or not, we're still definitely superior to all other beings in this planet before us.

Another flat Earth tier shilling thread

Evolution from species to species or inorganic to organic, unconscious to conscious are all hilariously impossible. There is no proof or theory that supports any of those types of evolution, yet the ignorant defend them because (((Science))) is their religion and theyre uncritical thinkers.

Why would a designed world need differentiation like that, anyway?

What do you suggest instead?

It has an entire fucking scientific field of its own you dipshit..

Since science is 'uncritical', what would you present as alternative?

Its based on fact not faith you fuck. It is fundamentally opposite of religion. People don't worship something in science.

Did you honestly learn about that in year 7?

I feel sorry for these people.

Are we still being raided by /christian/?

Don't remember, school ,as in when and what I studied, is a blur.

Why did God make blacks then

sage for christCuck thread.

Evolution does exist,it's teleological adaptation. When you change the selection pressures it may appear to be 'devolution' , but that's because unlike nature, you're brain is limited in by what it preconceives as 'good' or 'bad'.

Nazism 'evolves' a population by increasing selection pressure and democracy 'devolves' it, but even those are bubbles that exist in the grand drive for evolution. Evolve or die.

This is a blackpoll smh tbh fam
Shame on you to to take what is deliberate effeminacy promulgation strategy of the Jews and try to spin it as "face it white males are just naturally devolving and there's nothing you can do goy"

These are not serious topics, Holla Forums has been under sustained targeted subversion for 72 hours

Demoralization propaganda.

Mutation and interbreeding are problems that can be addressed. It's only the retards that don't believe in DNA that have problems.

Though, interbreeding 'whites' is harmful, which is one of the problems I have with white nationalism. People still don't quite take full responsibility for their genetic posterity.

It's funny how you all are such red-pilled anons in regards to history, but when it comes to science you're the most bluepilled people on earth.

Then look at what evidence your "entire fucking scientific field of its own" is based on. Look for the foundation pillars. But you won't, you rather believe your (((scholarly peer reviews))).

Evolution is just slight mutations that get more widely spread when they successfully help a creature survive better. Eyesight started off as being able to sense light and that gave early organisms an advantage thus they would survive and spread that gene. Eventually more mutations would happen and the better adapted creatures would survive leading to eyesight. And no, evolution isn't a fedora belief, you could even say God guided it.

Filthy, dumb christcuck scum.

that's a health code violation if I ever saw one.

Be nice to christcucks, they don't know any better. :^)