Friendly reminder that the alt-right are a real threat

Friendly reminder that the alt-right are a real threat

Breitbart is no longer a meme, it has officially entered the public sphere

The alt "right" is a joke. Everyone knows race realism is a key tenant of Marxism.

They just need an easy scapegoat.

Does anyone happen to have the picture of Hillary being gassed?

Sounds like an inflated ego. Holla Forums is just attaching itself to already existing trends with memes and jacking itself off.
Holla Forums isn't a threat but the people they wish they were are.

...

By that logic B████ was only popular because of us.

FTFY

It's entered the "public sphere" as a scary boogeyman for Hillary's campaign.

The way things are running now, the Democrats are going to destroy the Republicans and the alt-right et al will be blamed for it.

Except no. You're far less relevant then you think.

...

Pretty much. I doubt the Democrats really think alt-right is a threat, as it's contained to weaklings and chumps who think they're on the forefront of an amazing white revolution when in reality they have no effect on anything and their candidate is dying in the polls. The real reason Hillary even mentioned them was because Trump's new campaign manager panders to them and therefore it was a good way to further cement that Trump has tons of ties to racism and thus sink any chance of him getting votes from minorities (if there was even one to begin with). And seeing as how David Duke, Donald himself, and the alt-right took the bait and decided to flood Twitter with racist bullshit in an attempt to "redpill" the normies who have just been exposed to them, it has only reinforced what Hillary said.

Also note how she set up a nice reel-in for moderate Republicans who at least try not to be racist, like Romney and McCain. This both encourages these moderates to vote for her to screw over Trump, the guy shitting up the party of Lincoln, and after the election is done and over with, these moderates will come out in force to say "I TOLD YOU SO" and will gloriously fight with the other elements in the Republican Party who went full alt-right and bent the knee to Trump.

I'm very happy this is happening, because while I find Hillary to be an extremely sketchy and untrustworthy person, killing the Republican Party's chances for a Senate supermajority, Presidency, and Super Court majority will open the path for more progressive and leftist policies.

alt right is not a threat, just butthurt white neckbeard virgins

That would be great if democrats didn't represent the Left in Normalfags minds, because Democrats keeping fucking up because of neoliberalism,AND no relatively powerful opposition to blame will further alienate them from socialists views.

It's amazing how liberal "progressives" can never make any real argument.

Yeah right. With the Republicans gone, the US is basically a one-party state and if you seriously think that this will open up the Democrats for more leftist views you haven't seen the DNC. And by "progressive" I assume you don't mean just pandering to minorities or immigrants.

Here is what's gonna happen: Hillary will fuck shit up royally, especially in Eastern Europe and the Middle East while being one of the most unpopular presidents in history since the only reason she was elected was because the alternative was a racist trash TV star - the opposition that will continue to take shape (and eventually an alt-right candidate will emerge that isn't as dull and revolting as Trump) will call her out on being "socialist" and "cultural marxism", the usual shitfest. Good look on forming left wing opposition, you saw how S█████ got hijacked by IdPol.

Glad I'm Europoor where we can at least elect more of less real socialist parties (and then watch them fail and fuck shit up even harder)

I think what he meant was that if the Democrats destroy the Republican Party in this election, and it leaves them in a complete disarray while the Democrats pick up a bunch of moderate conservatives, that might create a situation that causes a sort of shift to the left on the political spectrum, where the Republicans die as a viable party, which would theoretically open up the opportunity to challenge the Democrats from the left.

I've had this thought myself, though I don't know how realistic it is.

Isn't Europe today basically everything we at Holla Forums fear America will become under continued "radical centrist" policy? The political right has been essentially exiled from mainstream politics, the radical/mainsteam left have merged into a porky abomination, PC has been publicly embraced as official doctrine, and the extreme right is the only viable outlet for political dissent.

The leftist slant of European used to be a good thing, back when open tension existed between the mainstream and radical left, but since the '90s shift to leftism as an ideological centrism, it's a suicidal recipe for disaster.

How? By calling Republicans racist? Are you implying that they haven't been doing that for the past 30 years or more?

The alt-right is a spook. It doesn't exist outside the minds of paranoid schizophrenics like Hillary Clinton.

I believe the American political system inherently always culminates in a two-party dichotomy by the way it's designed, I don't know what would suddenly be the opener for multipolar parliamentarism unless you are assuming the Republicans get destroyed for good.


Well the whole SJW/IdPol thing is still not the abomination that it is in America. I also want to point out that most alternative socialist parties (Corbyn, Syriza, Podemos, Wagenknecht, Varoufakis) that are opposed to the SocDems are fiercely critical of the EU as a central institution the way it is designed right now - they also call out imperialism and ask the property question, which S█████ never did.

I think the main difference between modern rightists and the typical skinhead that's dumb as fuck is that they appear as intellectuals, well dressed and basically being presentable smugs like Milo or this whole new-right intellectualism that encompasses the work of "dark enlightenment" philosophers.

Trust me, that's not how they come off. Pretentious and ignorant at the same time while wearing completely ridiculous clothing unfit for the context or the weather. They look like they have autism. I see a dude in a trenchcoat and a fedora in the middle of the summer rambling on about right wing values, actually meeting Buddha, and how "void theory" (that being, that ghosts don't exist and you don't become an omniscient ball of floating energy which is a part of Buddha as Buddha is a bunch of floating balls of omniscient energy) is a load of bullshit, isn't somebody anybody sees as an intellectual. It's somebody we laugh at and make jokes at like "I cast fireball!" behind their back.
I mean "dark enlightenment" sounds like a tabletop rpg.

CIA and Shrillery if you're reading this, pls gib gunz, training and monis. If I do good, can I have a gold-plated AK like Saddam got from Bush I?

t. Dr. Piccolo, Freedom Fighter

Possible but the US doesn't have the history of class consciousness that Europe does, it's further to the right than Europe and has a fairy tale romance with markets. So I don't really see Democrats being the new more centrist conservative party fighting a new left, I think everyone will be dragged to the right to win elections

It's like they know their ideology is bankrupt and total shit so they try to make up for it by dressing up nice and having knock-off Hitler haircuts.

I could fund this. And then draining money from Holla Forums with it.

No, because the whole movement will be associated with Trump supporters, and Trump and his supporters will undoubtedly be blamed for the loss if he loses.

If the Democrats win in a massive landslide in this election, as is predicted, you'll likely end up with a situation where the Trump faction is blamed by the anti-Trump faction for the loss, while the Trump faction blames the anti-Trump faction for sabotaging their campaign (shenanigans like Cruz denouncing Trump at the convention won't help this issue)

Meanwhile, while the various far-right tendencies in the Republican party are all squabbling, Hillary will probably pick up some moderate Republican supporters.

This is how the Republican Party disestablishes itself, if it happens.

It's short sighted to not view the alt-right as a serious threat. Think about how many young people have pledged themselves to reactionary causes lately. How many people were "redpilled" by shit like gamergate and various anti-SJW online media personalities.

Holla Forums has to be stopped.

Trump already replied to Hillary's paranoid delusions (she isn't really it is just what the speech writes put in because they think what worked back in 1992 is still applicable)

Do you know what you sound like when you say that?

The only people that hopped on Gamergate were basement dwelling virgins, just like the alt right of today.

They have no power or influence.

The people who hopped on GG were the product of what the "left" has become: The new Christard fundies

Like Milo…

The only reason they got this far was because of overreactive tards giving them attention. Just ignore it and it will all go away.

...

If that is all it takes then why does the establishment go out of its way to mention it, and I don't just mean Hillary as this shit is all over the media now. Maybe the KKK endorsing Hillary isn't a joke.

Hillary is stupid for even mentioning it, same with any media outlet.

Don't underestimate memes, the internet lets them rapidly spread their bullshit without scrutiny and polarise everything into us vs them. It's not going away they have to be out meme'd

I wish we were in the good old days before the Internet became a shilling contest.

Alt-right is now the new word used against people who disagree with establishment cultural liberalism and neoliberalism.

Why is there no "alt-left"?

it's called the post-left

The post left autists could be considered alt left.

Left-behind is more accurate.

that's racist

I have seen some neoliberals start trying to refer to actual leftists as alt-left.

Because rebranding is a shit technic that doesn't do shit when you're not controlling the media.
t. Gamergate

We are the alt-left. You guys are going to call me out on this but we are. We are not social liberals, not AntiFa, not IdPol but we are also not USSR veterans.

I don't see what's wrong with embracing the term alt-left.

gamergate won, you would know this if you weren't some retarded faggot trying to fit in.

they started it long time ago

...

they're not a real threat because they have no policy aside from BAN DARKIES. the average person doesnt give a fuck if pablo is deported if their wages are still low. trump's economic policy is recycled supply side theory (which we know only helps those at the top) with a bit of protectionism (which wont save americans from the fact that they cant compete with robots and countries without labor laws).

There is a difference between those who want fascist corporatism and those who want small government. They are united by their fear of ethnic minorities and the socialist boogieman.

Unless you're saying Trump isn't protectionist enough, I hope you're just off your meds.

Also

"the dark enlightenment" has to be one of the most cringy and fedora'd names for an ideology/political philosophy

Kinda fitting cause it's all evo-psych/HBD/PUA bullshit

nice shilling Holla Forums

There is, it's called neoliberalism.


Obviously.

Seriously…

Except "that rebranding don't do shit" is something i precisely learned from this shitshow. What did switching from #Burgerandfries and to #GamerGate did media wise? Fucking Nothing, slander continued. So after that they stick with it and everytime someone went and said something along the line of "let's switch hashtag with something less loaded and more inclusive guise", he was rightfully told to fuck off.
Sorry user, you're the fucking newfag.

whoa

it increases productivity, but decreases the number of jobs… you realize that if a machine can do everything a person can, there's no reason to hire that person, right?

Not what but why. These are not the same thing. I did not pay attention to the former for more than ten seconds but when the media declared in one voice that gamers were dead, yeah that got my attention.

Also..
Fuck off.

what is this, some kind of indie book store?

It cannot consume the product. And a person without a job cannot consume it either so the robot becomes redundant, a source of lost revenue.

So why? Why rebrending to alt-eft if not for an hypothetical PR reset?

Rebranding have nothing to do with it. MSM slander is what got your attention. Each rebranding is a concession to the other side and a risk of splitting userbase, and fortunately, the lesson was learned soon.

That's kinda' the definition of protectionism

Why? What magical, completely unprecedented force would prevent demand from increasing as a result of lower prices? We're talking basic economics dating back to the dawn of the industrial revolution.

Speaking as someone who thought GG was a dumb name, this even extended to post-#GamerGate tags, such as #NotYourShield. Shills gonna' shill, that's what happens when the media has an agenda.

I never said you should, or would. The neoliberals have however rebranded you as brocialist reactionaries. Good luck with that.

Overproduction

Cheap goods won't increase demand if people don't have any money because of unemployment. It's almost like if capitalism have contradictions…

Because advocating the original, actual tenets and principles of leftist thought does not constitute an "alternative left;" it's just the left. There's nothing alternative about it.

The problem is that the term "left" has been attacked, corrupted, destroyed and redefined, to the point that the average person has either a totally inaccurate interpretation of it, or simply doesn't know what it means.

That has never happened in all of history. If human consumption were finite, we'd be living like medieval monks, but at a cost of only a tiny fraction of the income they needed to do the same. Most people aren't wired that way.


Which is completely unrelated to automation, just like always.


"Classical left" is the only other alternative I can think of.

See pic

potential human consumption ≠ real consumption

So people have their fill of cars, or furniture, or food. Even if they don't want extras, they will want better ones. On top of existing commodities (or even in their absence, for obsolete ones like horses or hardcopy mass media), there are new commodities, which will themselves improve.

People, most people, will always want more.

So…can I be Not Socialist in public yet?
Mmm?

Every living human is a threat to all that matters lad.

I'm still fond of the term "the new old left" but obfuscatory language appeals to me more than it should.

bitch please

deflationary tendencies always associated with depressions

economic agents will hoard cash
so there you have liquidity trap

plus, in the environment of olygopoly capitalism, prices are not so elastic as you want them to be

How does it feel commies?

feels good to be dangerous

there is.
They were racist liberals, so we didn't use the label.
We are the left.

is there any difference?

Friendly reminder that the alt-right is a spook.

How does it feel to be a unwoke goy?

same as front national in France and other various right wing political parties in Europe.

don't under estimate the fear factor, also blaming darkies for all your problems is easier than facing the truth

Source

You sure the whole "people always want more" has nothing to do with advertisements being shoved in their faces 24/7 literally demanding that they want more?

Makes you wonder why companies spend all those billions on advertising if people will come around to their products as a course of "human nature".

"libertarians" are minarchists

Ads serve primarily to aid in competition between rival porkies selling products that aren't different enough to cause customer preference without propaganda, their effect on total demand is exaggerated. This dishonor among thieves is merely another example of the pointless waste created by capitalism's inefficiency as a resource distribution system.

Yeah, but those angry, young, unmarried men actually had to leave their houses.

i thought the alt left were neoliberals

If by "fiercely critical" you mean gives light lip service to the notion at party conventions, followed by rubber stamping every neoliberal policy under the sun when pushed by the EU.

It's no real secret that the only genuine opposition to the EU is from the reactionary populist/nationalist parties. It's a real mark of shame that's absolutely going to be haunting the Left for it's lack of credibility in the future.

who do you think i am?

The only solution is replacing FPTP voting.

...

...

I'm just saying I don't think you have much to worry about. The average Holla Forumslack nowadays thinks "revolution" is voting for Trump, that is if they're even old enough to vote in the first place.

Literally no different from Tumblrinas, people gave them so much attention out of spite that their idiot community grew like a weed from the exposure.

...

Not that guy, but what does he sound like?

I envy people who didn't use facebook, twitter, reddit or Chan for that period of time, I really do. I couldn't escape that shit

It was an invigorating gust of fresh air compared to the putrid quagmire of morally outraged virtue-signalling most of the online hobbyist venues I frequented became over 2007-2014. I'm honestly amazed it didn't happen sooner given the furious reactions to Mass Effect 3 and Atheism+.

based.

Sounds like you never heard of glorious Incan socialism faggot