What went wrong? Why isn't north korea a utopia? Also why didn't he smile when he won the gold medal?

What went wrong? Why isn't north korea a utopia? Also why didn't he smile when he won the gold medal?

Other urls found in this thread:

korea-dpr.com/business.html
youtube.com/watch?v=I6uU8mgLmgk
slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/fighting_words/2010/02/a_nation_of_racist_dwarfs.html
slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/fighting_words/2005/05/worse_than_1984.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

State capitalism

Because fatty mcfats said the NK team had to get 5 gold medals, he's probably going to the gulag once he gets back

But North Korea is socialist. There is no free trade.

……………………………………..State capitalism means that the state trades with the rest of the world.

Owning that much precious metal is a crime in Korea, he's going to the gulag for trying to reintroduce capitalism.

...

That's true for virtually every nation on earth that has a military without domestic arms production.

Capitalism is the free exchange of goods and services between individuals, which obviously does not happen in this case.

It's almost like anarkiddies are just shitposters

You guys realise that capitalism encompasses more than just trade, right? Wage labour, private ownership of production, capital accumulation, and surplus value extraction all factor into it, too. There is trade in socialism.

State capitalism would be the state owning the means of production, while still ticking off other boxes of a capitalist economy.

Also, north Korea does trade with other countries, among other forms of free trade in 'special economic zones'.

What's NKs economic system called? What's nazi germany's economic system called?

Everyone has their own opinions. Depending on the semantics involved you will get wildly different answers.

I would call DPRK state capitalism, and I would call Nazi Germany capitalism. That doesn't take ideology into account, just economy.

when you're so bent on shitposting against anarchism that you a agree with "capitalism is free exchange between individuals" as a radical leftist it's time to reevaluate your life and politics

Overly simplistic and untrue.

he will be put in camp for this, don't worry comrade

because kim il sung around the end of his life became a fascist and then founded the juche ideology

hell they want corporations to work with them

korea-dpr.com/business.html

This is your brain on capitalism

capitalism means private industry. It has nothing to do with trade. You are thinking of markets.

Some male spiders are giving dead flies to females spiders in exchange for sex, so those spiders are capitalists.

Goddamn capitalist spider pigs. Nazi masturbation fantasy when?

I didn't mean to say "Nazi masturbation fantasy when" that was the word filter. I said R a c e w a r w h e n?

lurk more you stupid newfag

This is what you seriously think? Holy fuck, read a damn book for once in your life.

Not him. But what does it mean then?

"Individuals" is limited to humans only, not animals.

I don't think that constitutes trade anyway, as spiders lack both language and the intellectual capacity for negotiation – something necessary for trade. Spiders also lack the concept of property entirely, forget private property. They have an exchange, but it's all based on instinct, much like how the different organs of your body work together and benefit each other, without there necessarily being any conscious thought involved.

All states throughout history trade with the rest of the world, even protectionist ones. The idea in which that is what constitutes state capitalism is ridiculous and naive, that's like me saying that I'm a murderer because I watch horror movies.

I think it's a good and accurate description of state capitalism. Everybody who trades are capitalists

It's a word that leftists use to hide the massive economic failures and mass murders of socialism – that have taken place wherever it's been implemented – by calling it something else, much like how the failure of the Soviet Union was all blamed on the leadership (Stalin in particular) and not the theory.

But thats wrong you fucking homo.

State capitalism is when the state takes over the role of the traditional capitalist in that the state owns and controls the means of production, employs the workers, pays them wages and sells them back the products, using profit made by extracting the surplus value of the work to invest.

But that's not a free market. Why not call it state socialism instead?

Because a free market is not a pre-requisite for capitalism.

Free market capitalism is called, big surprise, free market capitalism.

Also its not socialism because it does not have any of the properties of socialism, since state capitalism doesn't have to be controlled by the workers.

...

They were some of the most brutal capitalists we've ever had.

Don't bother comrade, he probably buys into the "all of history is capitalism" and "capitalism is human nature".

A capitalist is someone who buys commodities in order to sell them.

Trading is human nature and trading is capitalism.

Do workers own the means of production under the state? Or does state own everyone?

.t Historians and economists are wrong because i think so.

Which economists and historians?

Looting is even older than trading so looting is even more human nature, why are you against me taking your stuff? Don't you believe in human nature?

We've been over this a million times. People will always trade what they can for other goods. Trading will always exist in one way or another and when you trade you set a value for the commodity and value is the same as money. Money will always exist.

Lol no. People will trade if that is their best option. If I can steal your money without consequences its a better option for me and I will do that, and people have always done this.

youtube.com/watch?v=I6uU8mgLmgk
tl;dr

Also, Caspian Report is bretty good.

You don't understand user, when emptying your house, i'm making room for you to store more stuff! That's already a trade!

meant to quote

Blame Marx.

You can't make this shit up.

Multiple things:

First of all, they were from the start very nationalistic. The Korean's Workers Party was kicked out of the first Communist International because of this.

Secondly, they hardly have any decent Marxist theorists.

Thirdly, trying to be self reliant with a country of that size is … not that smart.

And last of all they have an insane government which make business opportunities. I'm not a Trotskyist, but Trotsky's analysis of a degenerated workers state can be applied to North Korea, I think.

Another thing to keep in mind is the Confucian culture and the renmans of Japanese fascism.

Too bad the gun I own says otherwise because I traded to have one, and you're a poor piece of anarchist shit that is using a piece of scrap metal because you couldn't be a human being long enough to barter.

American ones, probably. Most Americans think capitalism = trade & markets.

HAHAHAHA. Tankies admit it, DPRK is not only an economic and political failure. But it also ironically advertises those failures to foreign companies so said companies can exploit the nation's workers to the greatest extent.

We really need to start asking lolberts what went wrong with Zimbabwe

They'll just point at Zanu-PF and blame leftists.

they will respond with
Only libertarianism with Aryan values can work, obviously. This is pretty much party line at this point.

NK is a failed, famine and slave stat that idiotic western leftists support because of "muh evil American imperialism" meme that is prevalent on the Left.
I'd rather live in the USA than a racist, nationalistic shithole like NK.

Christopher Hitchens did some lovely articles attacking that authoritarian shithole.

slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/fighting_words/2010/02/a_nation_of_racist_dwarfs.html

slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/fighting_words/2005/05/worse_than_1984.html

...