We have gotten a bit off-topic at least relating to the start of our discussion which was what to do about technological unemployment.
You think that virtually everyone that is fit can find something to do.
I think thats incorrect. Been over the reasons.
We also dont disagree that there is such a thing as useless people, dregs etc. I m also pro-sterilization of the genetically unfit (though not for killing them off, since they are not at fault themselves). I also support economic incentives to limit reproduction in the very
lowest achievers (eugenics really, think 1-child policies).
I just think we differ on where to set that limit. For me, its at bottom 10% or so only, and I m absolutely fine with sustaining the rest in a worthy existance, even if they are never needed, as long as they are able and willing if called upon by circumstance. If you incentivize the top, you wont run into (many) motivational issues.
my reasoning here has always been that importing aliens as a stopgap measure is like burning the house for heat. The argument that "danes dont want to take those jobs" has never held much weight with me either (i live in dk). They are quite happy to do the dirty jobs, as long as they pay well. Free movement of workforce has removed the incentive, and taken to an extreme you end up trying to compete with slave labor, so obviously we dont want that. Nations should protect their workers interests better via protectionism and being self-sufficient. Produce stuff at a higher price locally if need be, for local markets, and make it competitive by taxing the hell out of imports (unless its something you cant make locally). This keeps jobs inside the country, keeps high standards of living, and pisses of the jews/globalists who have no ethnic/cultural/racial stake in the country. Win-win (obviously i m simplifying and exaggerating to make some quick points here)
(unrelated but I m also have pro-white bias. I want nonwhites out of European lands, regardless of their individual traits or merit, and I m far less humane there. In order of preference: deportation (open to using bribery), death, sterilization, 1childpolicy, possible exception for far-easterners as they have never been a problem in countries I'v lived in).
I didnt say that. Clarification: Able, willing, but not needed. I realise you and I disagree, but its my position that that will be an increasing percentage of the population. I disagree that there will always be work for them for reasons we v been over.
In short, I m pro-eugenics, white-nationalist, protectionist, and socialist (in some regards only. I m pro-private property rights as one example of many).