What's up with all the fucking dykes...

>>>/r9k/

There's no such thing as Bi. Nobody in this world is Bi, because ultimately all those women would choose a man over a woman. The problem lies within a bad upraising and the fact that "they don't need or have no man in their fertile years", which means they are looking for "love" in all places they can find, which usually also means their female room-mates because all of them without a stable relationship in their life, turn into useless whores, especially with the shitty upbringing infront of talmudvision.

At least this reply is more intellectually honest than "hurr durr worthless men". I agree that (probably) most/all women aren't naturally straight. But I made the thread to discuss the ramifications of that. Since the sexual liberation an increasing number of women spend their prime reproductive years in homosexual relationships so "they can get experience". Women's fertility is a lot more restricted than men's and it also takes 9 months to carry a child AND another 2-3 years to raise it. Which makes dykery far far worst than faggotry. Am I the only one who finds this trend repulsive?

Why do hell would I want to watch another mans sausage or hear his grunts when I can have another woman on screen and hear her moans?

you flaming faggot

For all the wrong reasons imo. Clearly women are more into each other than they are to men. I personally don't feel comfortable having sex with someone who isn't enjoying it.

Congrats, you're a dyke. Nothing wrong with that but at least be honest about it.

Stop believing the Jew and following his degeneracy, you fucking idiot.

that argument has already been debunked, read the thread you stupid fuck

Doesn't mean that they couldn't enjoy themselves with a woman necessarily.

Of course it's pretty uncommon for any women to seriously be be bi or lesbian, but many women seem to try and be these things due to some fear of men that has been instilled into them. It probably sounds nice to just be in a relationship with a friend and women constantly get told horror stories about how all men are rapists.

If you see any sort of major increase in lesbianism, pretend or otherwise, it's probably because of the anti-male politics that has become popular over the past decade. Before that point, you usually just heard of women maybe trying something for a year or two after turning 18 to 'experiment' and then giving it up because they grew up and realized it was just being silly kids.

women rather fuck each other during their prime years but when the tits start to sag then its time to stop "experimenting" and find a real man.

Pretty sure that nonchalant kind of attitude is part of the problem. If a man "experiments" he's labeled as gay (and rightfully so). A woman preferring lesbian porn is gay regardless if she married a man or not. I don't have anything against homosexuals but for those who are truly straight it is important to not muddle the definition.

Look at those pants. Really I get an atusitic fit just from looking at them.
What idiot, designs the buttons to be on the back?
Very counterproductive - unless she put them on backwards wich is unlikely(but plausibly not)
We all know how desperate you are when you're really aching for a shit, and how the button & fly tend to turn into a rubix-cube at the crucial moment.
Now having them on the back really turns that panic up to a ten.

THIS, YOU RETARDS!

...

Trash posts are trash.

Seems like there's no ridiculous pre-requisites when women put out for each other either.
I'm at a fatalistic point where if you're not a 6'4" Millionaire Chad with a throbbing 14 inch aryan anaconda, then you're probably fucked, but then again I'd be a hypocrite if I said I didn't prefer tall affluent women myself. Guess it's time to go under the knife and get my legs broken and prepped for bilateral osteodistraction, work 2 jobs, jelq for 2 years, and try and impress some whore who'll probably end up cheating on me with a felon, robbing me of half my things, you know how it goes.

Have any of you Gentlemen gone MGTOW yet?

Fucking virgin neets on this board at this hour, every day. They're on the back so that it's easy for the female's mate to undo them while shes in mating position.

I am, but careful with the tradcucks on this board. The word MGTOW drives them in a frothing rage when they think the women dindu nuffin.

Of course.

...

Everyone will be mgtow in 10-20 years. Beating around the bush is pointless.

Women who use porn sites aren't a good metric. Go by what erotica women read.

MGTOW are faggots looking to recruit.

...

I remember reading a study where "straight" women were presented with erotic stories and had their sexual sexual arousal measured. Both texts were the exact same except the word "man" was replaced with the word "woman", the word "cock" with the word "pussy" etc. Women were significantly more turned on by the lesbian erotica. Like, a lot more.

Not only that, but jews own those sites and want nothing more than to plant the idea that women like to watch lesbians, niggers, cuckoldry and all sorts of other vile crap that they've tried for decades to get people to like but that only a small minority actually likes.

They produce interracial and cuckold porn at a loss. Nobody wants it except a small group of degenerates.

Don't believe any sort of media controlled by jews.

Fuck off TRS, JIDF, Cuckchan etc, you know who you are.
The pornographic jew (be it in text or visual form) is at the same level as Cocaine, Crack, Meth, Heroin and all things destructive.

You're out of touch with reality. Have you ever talked to a woman the last 5 years? Give them a couple of drinks and pretend to care, and most of them will admit that they either had or fantasize about homosexual degeneracy.

ive seen a study that measured arousal while showing them scenes of porn or sexual activity or just nude pictures
while men straight or gay reacted more to either women if they were straight or men if they were gay
when it came to women they found no measurable difference corresponding to type of activity they were shown and their state of arousal
women are turned on by any sexual activity they're slaves to their instincts according to this study

also just act confident make moves and get laid in no time flat, that's modern women

Sounds like a study by feminists and kikes meant to scientifically justify degeneracy.

Use actual metrics. The top selling or read romance and erotica is supernatural shit with a male vampire fucking a woman.

And actually, the shit women also love to read is male homosex.

Not quite. All groups of women ("straight", "heteroflexible", "bisexual", and lesbian) were more turned on by women. All but the "straight" women (which were the minority in a random sample size btw) were pretty much lesbians. "Straight" women were homoflexible.

I could post screenshots but I'm afraid of copyright infringement. Go on researchgate and request them.

I wonder if you'd go to such ridiculous mental gymnastics if it showed a country such as sweden being into gay sex.

If you think this is about that then you've greatly misinterpreted my motives.

You misinterpreted mine, I was just saying modern women are easy as shit and it's fucking sad

as a species we've been genetically cultivating females for beauty for a really long time

the heuristics governing male selection vary over time but when it comes to females the trend is much more constant and focused

in a huge group effort we have created the most beautiful animal on the planet earth

how can you blame them

Which is a non-sequitur. Also if you think it's easy as a chad try making a fake lesbian account online.

That's so unbelievably fucking retarded it makes me lose hope in humanity.

You aren't taking into account that women are mostly emotional creatures and men are physical. Women and men have different sexual needs. You would only get the last laugh if it was "lesbian quiet bed" where the one woman stopped listening and sympathizing with the other.

Disgusting faggot. Get the fuck out of here with that shit.

This.

Let me explain how it works
A woman is attracted to whoever makes her feel safe, secure, and boosts her social status. That's all it takes to win over a woman emotionally. A lot of these attractions are subconscious. Notice the lack of dick in that equation. Women are all bisexual, but this does not mean they like women and men equally, but rather they could be attracted to just about anyone who fulfills these needs…. including a bulldyke or a nignog.

What we have going on today is a perfect storm and here is where the problem lies

I truly believe that there are no more dykes today than there were 200 years ago. What we have is the same problem we have with males

I really do blame kikes for this one. 20 years ago the hot topic in the West was muh overpopulation. And look, now magically have an entire generation of homosexuals, women who refuse to have children, and men who refuse to take care of said children. And it's only in white countries. What a coincidence.

literally just an argument that aesthetics is a primary motivator in natural selection for women

like the primary basis of sexual dimorphism in practically all mammals and many insects

how to evolution, fagoot

I think you haven't left your house in a while.

really going out on a limb there, fellow imageboard user

That's no way to leave the house, fellow memer. Use the sex slave tunnel.

You clearly don't understand shit. First of all the male ideal has remained stable for hundreds of years while the female ideal has changed significantly from fat cunts with small boobs to skinny models with big boobs.

Secondly there is no objective measurement of physical attractiveness, hence sexual dimorphism. Even if there was a male body is much closer to the geometric ideal (golden rule) that the universe operates on, not to mention all the great works of art from ancient greece to the modern era are half naked ripped men.

Thirdly, and I hope you kill yourself after this, if what you said is true then all animals on earth would stop reproducing with each other and move on to hump a human female as soon as they saw her

Like I said, kill yourself.

That story (daily mail, kek) is citing a poll created by a sex toy and lingerie store (Ann Summers).

Holy christ you are retarded.

Should I quote the guardian? The huffpost? How about the salon? It doesn't matter cause you'll blame the kikes no matter who reports. So save the pretense and just admit you're not open to any evidence that contradicts your narrow point of view, must like the SJWs.

lol, no. You are stupid and not getting the point. The original post above was trying to undermine the ethos of your OP, by quite rightly pointing out the source of the stats. You then responded here by quoting a Daily Mail piece that talks about stats that are from a company that also is tied to sex work (in this case, Ann Summers, which upon googling is a sex toy and lingerie company). So you've tried to defend the ethos and source of the OP study by quoting another study that has a similar bad background and whose intentions aren't objective. You couldn't be more of a fucking moron. Either that or a shill for sex companies. So save your whining about "waaaaah you are just like an SJW!" for reddit.

Reported for shilling anyway. I suggest other anons report this user as well. Probably a porn site shill. Don't bother responding to this post, as I've closed this thread after posting it.

Except there are LOADS of evidence that women are more sexually aroused by other women regardless of sexual orientation. Yeah report me you stupid kid. I wonder how much you'll cry once all this settles in. Pathetic fragile ego cunt.

mic.com/articles/128000/the-truth-about-women-and-same-sex-attraction-is-more-complicated-than-we-think#.fcWQvNn19

Marry your cousin. That's what nobility did after realizing that the commoners are fucking retarded.

...

The last two I've gone after have turned out to be dykes. Never knew it to look at them. There's probably decent women out there but I don't have the patience to play the numbers game. Approach 100 women, fuck five, one or none out of 100 will be remotely ltr material. I'm not mgtow but I see the appeal.

they all are…..

a man is nothing more than a useful tool, literally nothing else

save your life man, at least you have a choice your ancestors didn't

Fat cunts were never a human ideal of beauty.

Dubs confirm. Most straight women do get a sexual "blush" response from watching hot naked chicks. Some studies actually measured and confirmed this. Straight guys only responded to the opposite sex.

Now, the modern studies are increasingly getting subverted to push an agenda but this one rings true IMO.

holy shit you're a moron

if you have to sink to reducto ad absurdum then hmm, maybe your argument isn't actually that strong

also

even if we go by your own biased exampled, most of these women are chubby and nothing like the fit models we have today

i know you'll respond with something retarded again, to which i don't care, i don't argue with retards

i already said kys and i meant it

holy fuck you are even too stupid to read IDs

you're fucking blind

Fat woman detected.

Projection.
You're not even making any sense. You claimed that fatties were once considered beautiful. I proved you wrong.
Calm down, autismo. If you weren't so triggered you'd notice that I'm a different user.

I don't give a shit if you're a different user, when your explanation is "womyn are moar biutiful" then I really have nothing else to say.

B-But an0n… I have a penis

What a world we live in! Men being attracted to women is now viewed as degenerate!

so you're trying to argue that women who are attracted to women aren't physically attracted to them?

or is it that you're a huge biased faggot that seriously thinks men are more attractive than women

holy loly

Why not just go on Craigslist and see what you can get?

I did this for the majority of my 20s because fuck doing dating site surveys and I work overnight, so my dating pool consisted of single mothers in grocery stores.

Eventually I ended up finding a gal at 26 that knew me ages ago as we had the same acquaintances. That was five years ago and am still with her till this day. I know this isn't a usual good ending and telling people how we met is kind of awkward giving the notorious nature of Craigslist, but better than saying we met over say…World of Warcraft?.

Women are more beautiful, they are designed to be more beautiful. The difference for men is that being attractive is only a plus. You could be average in looks (even below average to some extent) and still appear attractive to women if you have the correct body, attitude and mindset.

I think it's a stupid fucking analogy that only an autist would come up with. Beauty is subjective.

Which makes you retarded.
It wasn't, though.
Duh.

It's not. Beauty has it's principles, there can be extensions to these principles but it still remains the same.

Are you really trying to reference the Bible as proof or guidance for anything?

Do you actually believe that a 600 year old man with the help of a few family members, built a boat so big that it housed every single animal on the planet? And that he had to do this because some bitch in a garden believed a talking snake and her wrong deeds seeped into her DNA to be inherited by her offspring?

If you do, then can you explain how, when the ark landed at one place in the world, that the animals were able to end up in their native countries? (ie kangaroos only live in australia, certain animals are only native to certain islands etc). Thats a long swim for a lot of animals… also what did they eat since the entire earth was flooded?

Not trying to be an asshole, but don't want to see a brother get caught up in some stupid jew religion either

best wishes user

A simple Google search will tell you that's patently false.

Some men only like men. Chimps breed with "hot" chimps. Goats breed with "hot" goats. If you really can't see the flaw in your reasoning then I'm not sure I can say anything to wake you up.

haha holy shit now you're falling back on "everything is subjective"

also lol
where is this analogy you speak of, user?

i was making a very direct argument about sexual selection heuristics over time favouring female aesthetics consistantly

this is not an analogy or a metaphor or poetry you unbelievable fucking dipshit

Found the same image with a lack of photoshop.

Yeah I'm done. I guess women are lesbians because women are more beautiful then. I suppose we have to agree to disagree.

The wind should've blown user straight into Aushwitz.

There will still be men who prefer the one on the right.

go fuck a dude until you feel better

I hope the white race dies. 10 million faggots are not nearly as bad as 1 million dykes. But I guess that goes over your head.

So what? These men are mentally defected, you're like a liberal trying to claim faggot marriage is viable because some chimps sometimes fucked another chimp. Here's one CONSISTENT AND ALWAYS TRUE Beauty standard: Symmetry.

7/10.

So lesbianism is not a mental defect?

...

but over time the trend will be towards physical ideals reflected by the greatest number of participants in the population

ie the average male will choose left

the fact that some people might go right is irrelevant. that's why it's heuristic, cocklord

Evolution does not work on a linear pattern………..

No, there will not be any single person with a functioning brain that prefers the woman on the right. Unless that man is blind or insane they will prefer the woman on the right 100% of the time. You will see the case that niggers in prison develop homosexual tendencies, but that is not due to their preference to men but due to the absence of women.

Orly? Prove it. Find us 10 such "men" of sound mental health.

holy shit you really need to learn what heuristics are

No, there is no such thing as lesbians. All women are "bisexual", it's just the case that women are biologically inclined to be attracted to men. What this means is that a woman will not find as much of a problem with kissing a woman as a man would if he were told to kiss another man. Why? Because women are physically more appealing, more delicate and less threatening.

Rule 34.

There are dozens of sites dedicated to GILFs. Autism is strong in you.

KYS
Y
S

No, it works on what is beneficial to survival. This also means that Evolution sometimes works by having the absolute minimum to survive.

Research shows women are more attracted to women. Lesbians are the only sexuality that is in actual concordance.

Then I guess we should end humanity now.

which means that an "ugly" person is not necessarily "bad" in evolutionary terms, it all depends on context, otherwise there wouldn't be so much biodiversity on earth

glad we agree

So? I asked you for 10 mentally sound men. Not fetishists.
More projection.

What about it?

You don't see women actively seeking out women over men. That just proves that women are more attractive and appealing.
Why?

No, an ugly person happens to be ugly due to physical defects. Women who look too much like men are not appealing to a man. A woman who chooses to hunt instead of taking care of their child is bad for a man. Symmetry is also important, a body that is asymmetrical in growth is unhealthy. They are genetically inferior to a symmetrical person. Clearly you don't understand how evolution works.

...

The average is wrong because exceptions exist. Hopefully I don't have to point out why that the argument is inherently flawed

You're using terms you don't understand again, autismo.

Your argument literally is that woman are "prutir" and thus that explains lesbianism. Aside from the fact that humanity would instantly go extinct, all the non-human species would look the same and gay men and pedos and granny fuckers and asexuals and people prefering blue hair and scat fetisists WOULDN'T FUCKING EXIST.

If you make an absolutist statement, you better back it up by really really hard facts.

I LOVE bashing retards.

no that isn't really the case, especially when it comes to humans. traits are selected because they belong to individuals which more successfully *reproduce* not those which are most fit for survival

survival is important in that it's a factor in whether or not you're *able* to reproduce, but there are plenty of creatures which trade massive litters for survivability, with many offspring or even the parent dying on average, and instead perpetuating through a shotgun approach

you can see the distinction very clearly in the case of animals which are massively sexually dimorphic

the argument is not absolutist, it's statistical

the fact that the majority of people will mirror similar beauty standards over time is tautological (the good kind of tautological in this case) because it's a feedback loop

humans don't have a random distribution of features which we use to define our idea of beauty. the distribution of features is A RESULT of the perpetuating ideals of beauty, because partners are selected and valued on this basis

you're strawmanning super fucking hard
nobody said nobody would pick the bitch on the right

the bitch on the right would not exist if nobody had selected for her phenotype in a previous generation

so that would be a patently absurd argument

QED you're retarded

Exactly. You made the claim
I asked you for proof. You responded with not only one but two non-sequiturs.

topkek

So the bitch on the right exists because someone selected for her ergo found her attractive? Glad we agree. Also she's an old woman and you're comparing her to some broad 40 years younger. So this discussion is fundamentally flimsy but trolling dumb cunts amuses me.

I guess since women are prettier they should reproduce with each other anyway.

correct, women are absolutely more attractive and appealing than men. This is an evolutionary advantage for women, who are more social animals than men.
Women are biologically more inclined to be sexually attracted to men.
Why would that be? There is no evolutionary advantage in that. Animals look different because that is what is most advantageous to them, and also because that is the building blocks they work with.
A large portion of gay men were abused as a child. They were nurtured into their growth.
Mentally defected people who are attracted to the cuteness of children/an extreme in the tendency for men to prefer younger women.
Either a man who is desperately seeks to a maternal figure in his life or a man so engrossed with the love for their mothers that they seek out older women.
Mentally defected people with possible traumatic experiences in life. Rats have shown asexual behavior in over-populated groups.
Exceptions to rules exist, and these exceptions are made when a person is reinforced into certain behaviors. The same reason fetish as a whole exists, it is behavior learned through personal experience. A dog does not learn tricks by itself.

literally nobody has agreed with you in this thread

you keep saying that though

go to a dark room and calm down for a while

You just described fitness. People who are fit to survive do survive and reproduce. Evolution is survival and then reproduction.

Make up your mind, either "beauty" is absolute or situational. You can't have both.

You made no provisions for age, autismo. Stick to the subject.
Nah, you're just posturing for the sake of your own bruised ego.

fitness for reproduction is not the same as fitness for overall survival, unless you're defining survival as perpetuation

which is true on a population level so I think this is just semantics

but it should be pointed out that most species don't live on the verge of death, they are sufficiently fit that they can sometimes disproportunately select for traits which do not enhance survival strategies–this is generally sexual dimorphism

an example is peacocks and their goddamn retarded tails. that shit makes them *less* fit for practically everything besides getting laid, and that's only because peahens are assholes

Are we speaking in terms of animals, who are not inclined to be attracted to humans? If that's the case your argument is flawed by it's very nature. Beauty is absolute in its principles, the most obvious example is to point out symmetry. Your argument boils down to rejection of "A" because "B" isn't "A" therefore "A" doesn't exist.

no unfortunately because the fucking retard you're talking to seriously thinks that women aren't selected for beauty because otherwise animals would only want to fuck human women

he seriously made that argument

I didn't even say symmetry doesn't exist, I merely challenged that symmetry can take many forms hence no sex is more "beautiful" than the other any more than humans are more beautiful, than say, mockingbirds.

I guess women should hump each other then.

You're right, if we are to look at things at an absolutely subjective perspective we will truly see that nothing exists. Animals are just different arrangements of elements (therefore an animal can exist), rocks are just groups of minerals and minerals are just elements (therefore neither rocks or minerals exist), the earth is just super-massive clusters of elements (therefore earth doesn't exist), the sun just a super-massive clusters of elements no different from the earth other than in magnitude (therefore you can not prove earth and the sun are different), and even these elements are just different arrangements of pressure gradients. Nothing in these universe exists because everything is a adjective of something; everything is what something does not what it is.

i agree

luckily they already do, and it's because women are beautiful

Well some things exist. Women getting more aroused by lesbian porn makes them gay. Female women being more beautiful than male lions is apples and oranges. Gravity exists but talking apes don't (inb4 niggers). My point is that women might be lesbian for all sorts of reasons. Such as no selective pressure to remove the lesbianic genes through millions of years (since women never really had a choice until the industrial revolution). Rape etc. Those are things you can test for.

Fair enough. At least you make your position clear now which is far more respectable than your beating around the bush earlier.

what the fuck are you talking about

your posts are half word salad

this is like when you called my post an "analogy". what analogy, user? where is this analogy?

The analogy was that you were comparing male physical beauty to female physical beauty through the eyes of (I assume), a straight male. Kinda retarded ain't it?

True statement.
Reasonable statement. There is no evolutionary repercussion for women being attracted to other women, however I believe this to be a byproduct to a woman's more sexual and attractive nature. Whether this is true is up for questioning.

He's trying to maintain status on an Anonymous imageboard. He's either tired of argument or has seen his mistake and is trying to lessen the loss of face.

that's not an analogy

what do you think analogy means

you're like some kind of space retard

A guy just wouldn't talk about it honestly. It'd just be some random thing they did some drunken night and then left it at that.

Women find it more socially acceptable because it comes across as just a lot of kissing and hugging, which many of them possibly think is all there is to it as evidenced by "lesbian bed death" being so common. Many so called lesbians have no actual sexual interest in women and it leads to intense sexual frustration which in turn leads to lashing out at their supposedly significant other.

The point is mostly that when people are young and not even sure if they are straight or not, it's not that odd to want to check and see just to be sure. For women things have gotten really fucked up though as you have so many fake lesbians that identify as lesbian due to hating/fearing men. These fake lesbians have helped push this warped idea of lesbianism that is driving a segment of women into its arms.

Go to church.

Fag confirmed.

Go look it up on a search engine.

Yeah what you "believe" needs to be supported by evidence otherwise it's broscience. There are billions of species on earth and each of them is beautiful in their own respect. So can we please leave outside subjective notions such as beauty, and focus on the more tangible things? Though I feel the discussion has kinda run its course, I'll probably be awake for an hour or so.

The evidence however shows that women are indeed lesbians. I don't see how it's possible to turn this shit around cause you have all these studies measuring vaginal arousal, porn sites releasing numbers and showing that women prefer lesbian sex, and even real life where if you talk to half-drunk women 90% will admit to having some sort of lesbian fantasy.

Nice Talmudic arguing. That's not the argument he was making. He was pointing out that the poll Daily Mail cited was from a poll by a source that would have a disproportionate difference in the data compared to the general population. He said nothing about lesbianism, only pointed out that your source was shit.

Stop being a kike and using kike misdirection.

have you considered fucking your mom
keep them good aryan genes in the family

Was it real in your mind?

And I said that I'd be down to accept that, had there not been myriads of other evidence pointing in the same direction.

That was pretty funny my dude. If you were trying to trigger people, you're failed pretty badly. When you make people laugh about Hitler and race realism, it doesn't really matter how many layers of irony you've applied. All the brain remembers is "Hitler did nothing wrong is funny".

Thanks fam.

Even milo knows it's just a meme.

shut up faggot

go to bed you massive autistic baby

So you're white kniting for faggots now? Makes sense.

more word salad

have you noticed how nobody has been swayed by your repeated attempts to distort reality? when you reply to somebody it's super obvious that the bullshit you post is a non sequitor you fucking moron, people can read what you're responding to

Might be a skirt, those usually have the bottoms where ever

Do you even know what word salad means?

sorry, what was that about analogies?

I already told you, moron.

no you spazzed out and embarrased yourself a bunch, used a bunch of terms incorrectly, and got called out repeatedly by like a dozen posters versus literally nobody agreeing with you

you're either the biggest moron on the planet or a bored shill trolling between shillposts, I can't tell. maybe both!

Okay I'll bite. Ignoring the super stupid appeal to popularity, where did I embarrass myself?

the stats are hugely skewed. most women don't watch porn. the ones who do are fairly abnormal anyway.

Where's the analogy, user?

Oh kys you retard.

literally shaking

Sperging aside, noticed a little detail right off the bat

Maybe porn consumption is tied to insecurities about oneself, more than sexual gratification. How about a different approach to this?

Maybe it's the dykes among the women that just really, really spend a lot of time with lesbian porn. With how desperate and overt the efforts to get any kind of male attention becomes over time on their part, I find it hard to believe that it is anything other than that. There would be no virtue signalling, screeching, seeking out and shaming, of men. They wouldn't be talking about men non-stop and need I add the whole hate crime thing? Any information and cases available bring me to one most likely conclusion: Homosexuality at least on the part of women, is not real and any pretense of it is only maintained through a mix of relentless emotional abuse, mutual shaming, and threats of ostracism, physical violence and other similar disincentives.That's why dykes always seem tense or angry. They are. And they're all the more, because they don't know why they are. One reason is that they're angry at themselves. When faced with men, they find themselves attracted to them. They fear and yet catch themselves thinking about seeking men out, maybe even dreaming about men.

But they were reaffirmed and told over and over how brave and progressive and educated and blah, blah, blah - over and over for ages, and all this praise hinges from start to finish on their faggotry. Coming to grips with not being fags would deprive them of so much perceived status, thus the thought of being attracted to men terrifies them, all the while their subconscious, or their background personality, or however you want to refer to as the entity that is summarized by their instincts is making progressively aggressive attempts at forcing men onto the forefront of their attention. This panic is what makes them so labile, and the erratic behaviour that tends to follow, is why there are a lot of them, that isolate themselves completely from public life, and mostly from men. Without a point of reference from which to imagine men, their subconscious has more difficulty at forcing them to think about men.

Another part of this 'angry dyke' behaviour is of course more inherent to women's nature. When a woman is on her period, it is soon time to mate, fertility-wise. Yet their behaviour isn't like a sweaty, big-breasted anime-girl, drooling and soaking all her clothes, whimpering 'oh user, take me now'. What they do instead, is to antagonize and attack men. Subconsciously and from an evolutionary point, this aggression comes with the express purpose of either angry sex, or pissing a man off so much he takes her by force. Either way, she gets knocked up. So if men don't come by themselves, women's instinctive approach to overtly enlisting male attention is to antagonize men. And dykes are women that haven't had any dick for a long, long time. Their anger is their body trying to get them fucked. It is their way of crying for sex, while Jewish-induced arbitrary belief systems have convinced her that that exact thing is oppressive/marginalizes sexual minorities/insert other mental gymnastics.

No matter how many layers of lies and malice there are, the Jew is in the end, no more than a petty con man.

Sad!

Are you entirely new to the internet?

When most men are pic related what are you expecting?

Really?

Way too many Freud-influenced faggots around here in this thread. Reminder that sexuality is a made up thing, to create delusions and make you go away from the norm, which is to be attracted to a female and have kids to further the survival of us.

Anything else is child-play, it's made up bullshit that people in their delusion thought made them aroused of. Seriously, getting off on stupid shit like feets or same sex, it's a crock of shit. There's no absolute reason to be excited about it, all it is, is that you're addicted to it, you have brainwashed yourself into becoming addicted to that shit.

There's no such thing as lesbianity, it's just bullshit. If a woman would be completely honest with herself, she would choose a man over a woman any day of the week. Why? It's in their fucking instincs.

Heil Hitler!

Also, 99% of them are not dykes, but are just doing it for attention.

More cuckchan tier demoralization bait. We're being raided.

Any hentai from porn hub is bound to be super degenerate.Go read vanilla doujins instead.

It's been well known for a while that straight women tend to prefer lesbian porn. The focus of the attention is on the woman's pleasure and it's usually more narrative driven than other kinds of porn.

The porn industry has caught wind of this long ago. Hell, there's an entire production label geared towards marketing all girl porn to straight women: "girl's way productions"

This is the kind of shit women are often into.
pornhive.tv/en/out/132220

This. How women got the sexual power in society is beyond me when they're far more hypersexual and obsessed with sex than men will ever be.

...

So you're saying it's women driving the interracial market? Telling by the pic above, that says yes. Just more reason to think little of white women. Trash. Always trash…

1. there's much more men watching porn than women.
2. "black" is among the top on men's side as well
3. niggers watch porn too.

...

Niggers are probably less than 5% of people on those websites. How many niggers have computers and internet connections?

also note the distribution:
"lesbian" is more popular BY FAR than the next search down, which is "threesome."
And then you have "squirt" and "black" being about equal at less than half of "lesbian" searches. Also note that not far below is "lesbian scissoring."

Compare that to men where you have a gentle slope all the way down with a diversity of themes.

So a mans brain wires cane be crossed to produce faggots, but a womans cannot?
Please…

Women are dumber and more susceptible to herd mentality/social pressures in terms of indoctrination.

i don't think he's saying that at all:

This data is useless. How many women [and men] watch videos on pornhub without making accounts and stating their gender? Probably millions.

...

thats normally the consensus every year they release these "statistics"

Degenerate porn watcher reporting in.
Pornhub was putting out a survey for people to fill out with the incentive of free premium for a month. Those who filled it out got more videos and no ads (pornhub has adblock detection and the average normie can't into inspect element).
This does still rely on the accuracy in answers of the surveys/logins but it does allow for better representation than if they didn't put them out.

...

Why is that so hard to believe? Men's and women's brains are massively different. Not to mention the probable reason men become faggots wouldn't make women dykes. As I see it, faggotry is probably epigenetic mutations occurring in the womb caused by chemicals that feminize the male brain and blunt testosterone output. Why would this process "masculinize" women to be dykes?

I think a lot of Holla Forums still thinks faggotry is all socialized, which is as stupid as Tumblr "it was real in my mind" genders. It may account for some gays, like those super traumatized ones abused in their childhoods, but it's more likely that faggots are broken from the beginning. Which is good news since then it's medically curable. And it explains the absence of dykes in history until gay culture became trendy in modernity.

It's because the men are completely pussified.

By curable, I should rather say it's preventable. Outside the womb, brain structure is out of our hands.

If that were the reason, they'd be seeking more masculine men via porn. See

Anyone here considered that PornHub is jewish owned and would lie about their viewers stats in order to push degeneracy?

Women find hot women hotter than hot men in many cases. Most women are bi-sexually loaded naturally. You think all those actual legends of man-woman-woman threesomes are just myths paved for "dapatriarchy"? No, it's just how they are. Certain type of women can be very easily manipulated into having sex with each other casually for you to enjoy and then join in. I've had this happen only a few times in my life but it's been a learning experience.

I assumed all the big porn sites were owned by jews.

Also I've read a lot of shit that many females fear the big dick and penetration, something about this turns them off. I'd say it's some childhood trauma of seeing daddy's big swinging dick in the shower or something and having a repressed sex education to not figure it out.

Don't assume, find out. The major ones are making millions, surely there's a source on where the money is going to.

yup. harder to find the traditional housewife woman
all women are whores nowadays, op.

How would they even know the gender of the watchers?

It's physically painful to take large insertions. It's not that they don't understand, it's that they do understand that getting an orifice stretched fucking hurts, especially in the most sensitive part of their body.

There are women who are primed beforehand to take large insertions that still groan in agony when they take them. Size queens are masochists.

Sauce?

...

Not at all. Even /r9k/ is waking up to it.

If you want to marry a woman, this lesbian phenomenon is something that has to be acknowledged and dealt with accordingly. It's rare that I ever see it talked about on Holla Forums, usually it's swept under the rug and everyone focuses on poopdick instead.

Dyke shit has happened always in history, just like gay shit. It's just at points it has been case of hide or die, now it's again in the open acceptable phase but with a much stronger and wider push through media.

so many cucked numales they have given up on finding an alpha

Can't disagree with those numbers.

exhentai.org/g/849513/ff70eb6906/

don't have the screencap, but one user made a convincing case that this is the road to trannying.

And at the same time very similar.
Everything that exist can be broken. Women suffer from all sorts of mental disorders just like men. Why would they suddenly be immune to homosexuality?

Or do you really want to believe a good dicking would cure them so badly, that you suppress all rational thought?

unless you can PROVE your claims, that is…

This is why you use adblock if you succumb to degeneracy. Don't let them make a single shekel off of your faps.

see

i say burn them all in pits

That's actually pretty cool

My theory is that all mammals are comforted by femininity because all mammals evolved to be completely reliant on their mothers for years. It's what both males and females are all hard wired to associate with comfort and being nurtured. Adult females in many species bond and live in groups away from males most of the year. Bonobo females bond sexually with each other to establish hierarchy and friendships.

Despite female homosexual behavior being previously an evolutionary adaptation I think there are strong arguments that it should be taboo for the ideal human culture that has the goal of achieving stable birthrate, families, and economies. In addition all sexual behavior outside of marriage should ideally be taboo because it frees up more human motivation for non sexual pursuits. Early sexualization is especially damaging to society because it makes it much harder for youths to learn to delay gratification and the motivation to work towards long term goals.

The increase in females reverting to chimpanzee sexuality is nothing less than chimping out. Going forward the only solution is to increase the quality of the average man and to shield the rising generation from early sexualization, while focusing heavily on helping the next generation of males to be alpha and successful.

Had to look hat up. Had no idea that was a thing but it makes perfect sense.

:^)

can confirm

t. straight transgender

Which one is the TRUTH? See here:

That is not a 7 face. That's a 10 face, you utter fuckwaste!

7/10

You know a woman's hotness depends not on your own personal opinion, but upon supply, correct? Suppose you were rating oranges. You'd put 10% of oranges, the best 10%, in the 10/10 basket.

10 doesn't mean "she's perfect". If she were 100/100 sure, she'd be "perfect", but we're talking 10/10 here.

The highest value should be preserved for absolute perfection. the highest anyone should realistically achieve is a 9.9

Women may be turned on by women together or naked women because women know how much this would turn on a man and that turns them on. Girls are often encouraged to kiss each other at parties for attention from all the guys. Being uber attractive to a man by having two women ready to be penetrated by warming each other up is the +fetish+ here… in the end it's the hyper attention seeking from a man that turns on a woman. If she sees a naked woman on screen she knows the director and all the men behind the scenes are loving this and the women are being oogled over. It's not the naked woman that turns her on like a naked woman turns on a man… women have tits and clits NBD, it's the behind the scenes "story" of why two women is so attractive to a man. Remember, with women the turn on is a lot more psychological than the physical turn on of a man.

Fetish for women is inherently different than men because of how women get turned on. Women get turned on by knowing a man is turned on by them, see how that works? They're not lesbian, they're getting off on a degenerate fantasy that always circles back to a man's throbbing dick watching them. Okay, this is turning into a porn psychoanalysis.

Real life bulldyke lesbians are pretadors and this paired with the Jews "homophobia is evil," easily swayed and silly women are being snatched up from the numales that are too scared to approach a woman, let alone dick her down like she would absolutely adore.

Normal straight girls read romance novels, they don't look up internet porn.
Also, trusting stats from the kikes who run the porn industry would be retarded even if it weren't for that severe sampling issue.

there are plenty of women that leave their husbands, children for some lesbo action. on the other hand you don't hear women complaining about how their husbands went gay one day and couldn't stop putting dicks in their mouths for some unknown reason.

They're masturbating alone most of the time. Whether it would turn a man on is out of the question.
That's why they tend to seek porn that has a narrative attached. Thinking about the directors and whatnot breaks the narrative.
this is correct
this is not
like I said here
If it was the lack of masculinity in our society that was driving women to watch porn, they would look for masculine men in porn. But they don't.

I actually do know of a case like that, it's an anecdote but still funny. This middle-aged Austrian guy my family knows was married to this hot blonde for many years, they had like three daughters together, he even hit on my mom while drunk back in the day. Then his wife cheats on him with one of his employees and they divorce and he's not mad about it in the slightest bit. Later it comes out that he was gay, and he has this personality change to the point where he's identical to what a gay Hitler would act and look like minus the mustache. He went off and moved in with his boyfriend in another city and we haven't heard from him since.

It's a lack of both male sensitivity and masculinity. Women want the whole package. A guy who understands feelings and is also rich and interesting.

Women are looking at porn for similar reasons to men. Boredom, loneliness, and early sexualization from media and peers who have been sexualized early.

This. I don't know why Holla Forums seems to think most men are numales. I know of like four numales in real life and they're all over the age of 35. Head into your local gym and you'll find the real men. Most dudes aren't the aryan ubermensch ideal either which is where I think people get confused, it's just most guys could be described as unremarkable.

Feminism has emasculated all the males and empowered women, women are now considered more attractive than men.

I would actually say neither.

I know this may sound a bit like SJW rhetoric at face value but seriously think about this:
People watching porn tend to want to put themselves in the place of the people in it. Now think about what most straight porn entails, some guy with a massive dick that would be painful to take railing some broad and basically treating her like a bag of meat. That gets most men off just fine, but that's who the porn is targeted at.
A woman watching porn wants to identify with someone in the scene. Since there's not much straight porn targeted at women (because it's obviously more profitable to target a scene at men), they default to lesbian porn in which one of them is in a position they'd like to be in.

seirously, watch this:
Girlsway productions was founded by a woman who markets all woman porn primarily to straight women. The video is very reliant on its story (however shallow and 1 dimensional it is) to arouse its viewers, because that's what woman want: a story.

goddammit, read the thread.

The guys watching porn aren't all fucking their step mom, they probably don't even have one. Women watching lesbians aren't necessarily fucking women either, maybe they just like watching people who know how to play with a clit.

Holla Forums, this greentext story will be little better than Tumblr lived experience garble, but take it:
Imo, the Christcucks are probably right, Holla Forums. Getting raped as a child has a high chance of turning you into a fag, and it doesn't really matter if you're male or female. Despite this, I haven't really noticed an uptick in fag women.

Most of these women are probably bulldykes. It's not like normal women watch porn.

Lesbians overlap with the kind of woman who watches porn. Pro-tip: Despite media propaganda NORMAL women do not watch porn on a regular basis. Normal women don't even masturbate at all on a regular basis. Female porn viewers are outliers with unusually high testosterone and or psychological baggage. So picture the people making those searches as dykes (they search lesbian, threesome, scissoring, teen), crazy girls who used to get into fights with boys in elementary school (squirt, cartoon, japanese, step dad and probably tentacles) and a lot of female niggers (much higher libido than Whites and Asians).

Anyone actually contemplating if lesbianism is a relevant thing is either secretely fetishizing it or a demoralization shill.

Why don't you leave your basement every now and then, dyke couples are everywhere nowadays and it's disgusting.

I go out a lot and I can't remember the last time I saw obvious lesbians. You probably just assume any two women you see walking somewhere must be a couple. Just because a woman LOOKS like a dyke doesn't mean she is. Short hair and terribly unfitting clothes are sadly fashionable in recent years.

Where do you live, user?
I'm in fucking California and I rarely see lesbians IRL.

Yeah, those two girls with manjaw, half shaven heads, holding hands while the other carries a longboard are "just friends". Give me a break I see at least one dyke couple a day. Most are extremely subtle though but once you meet enough you catch on to it.

Delaware. Though being in college is probably part of it. They are EVERYWHERE here.

I don't see them except for the town where they all congregate around here

They mostly have some areas where they're higher in numbers because they recruit a fuck ton, but in other places there aren't as many. Usually this is cities and colleges.

I went to college too. There were lesbian couples here and there but 99% of women can be assumed straight.

I've gone to college in (((Frankfurt))) and I saw a few cuck meme couples over the years, but lesbians? Not even there.

Wtf. Is Delaware a secret lesbian sanctuary? Do you have high child molestation rates? Maybe where you commute there's a bar or cafe managed by and marketed to lesbians or something.

Niggers are 13% of America and are more likely to be into that shit so it's more likely to be 20% of Americans

Delaware is extremely hipster
So maybe that's a part of it

...

I would say you're right in the long run, because in the end of the day women can get on each other's nerves and she'll want a man to be able to depend on, but in the short term it isn't that high. Many girls that are actually straight fall for the lesbian meme. Judaism is a hell of a drug.

It's probably my spidey senses and it isn't nearly that high here, compared with other (((university towns))). Generally look for athletic-ish girls that hang out a lot one on one, or have louder voices, higher testosterone. Another red flag is it one is white and another is a shitskin. Most try to hide it on the down-low probably because they're still afraid of homophobes in the current year or some dumb shit.

That it is. I'm graduating soon though and I can't wait to get the hell out of here, probably to one of our new red states or one of the almost red states to help out in the future.

Break the link, faggot.

Say no more. Let's see who or what Ann Summers is…oh right, it's a fucking SEX SHOP. They literally surveyed women who shop for SEX TOYS and stuff like that online, about their habits related to sexual stuff, online. The results might shock you.

Basically, the "article" you linked to is actually a thinly veiled ad for a sex shop, and a very blatant ad for degeneracy in general. In any case, it's an AD. There's no real "study" behind these absurd claims, they stem from a survey made by a COMPANY that sells SEX related things. You should really question your gullibility when you read that 96% of women have watched porn with a partner, and you think this statement could come out of a real study representative of the population of any nation on this planet.

Because normal women don't watch porn.

using the same augment that (((creationists))) use for (((evolution)))…
noice :^)

Some dudes just don't get it. You can have perfectly rational men that instantly become niggers when it comes to looking at women objectively.

You guys *assume* too much. I didn't know dykes existed in my college either, until I randomly found one cause we were hanging out for some project. Then I met her girlfriend and she told me about at least 7 more women that were confirmed carpetmunchers.

user you get exactly what I'm talking about. It's pretty much under the rug but it happens a lot more then most people would think, because these girls don't stand out as much as bulldykes or flaming faggots do. On top of that even a high percentage of straight girls experiment around. Once I figured this out it struck me as odd that Holla Forums was completely dead silent on the issue because it directly affects white genocide (dyke relationships often involve at least one white girl, most of the time two) so I figure most people don't know so they go about their business. What socialist hellhole do you have the misfortune of living in?

colleges usually have thousands of people, user…
Faggots of all sorts meet each other in the rainbow alliance and shit like that. The fact that you meet one who knows 7 doesn't mean anything.

seriously, your argument basically amounts to "there's tons of creationists at college. i hung out with one for a project. then i met his friend and he told me about at least 7 more creationists."

These people tend to know each other.

Our college was small, as in we had 30-40 people in our class. So dykes made up a third to a fourth, which is actually in line with the stats that about 25% of modern sluts have had homosexual sex (and those are the ones that admit it).

THAT is believable. Women often TRY it, they rarely stay with it though.
Unless the survey you're referring to was done in person or required identifying information, I fail to see the relevance.
One class does not a representative sample make.
What class even was this?

PROBABLY TRUE LMAO
But I thought the Rothschild elites have tricked us into hating and blaming the jews instead? Or are the Rothschilds jewish themselves? I forget.

What he said, if you can get one to be honest with you they'll point out a bunch in your general circle that are closet dykes. That's not even including the random obvious ones around campus. It's still in the minority but among millenial women it's more common than you think. I guess you've either been really lucky, or you haven't had the misfortune of finding out. In college, if she isn't getting passed around the cock carousel, she usually finds her way into the lesbian circles. Unfortunately that's the way it is, but the good news is this isn't representative of the entire country, or even of their entire life, either.

see

On a porn site, definitely. This was always the case though.

I'm laughing so hard right now… Thank god that isn't me.
Leninist numale cuckboys are the reason I pray for Sam Hyde to conduct more mass shootings.

Also, I think you're overestimating the promiscuity of college aged women.
That's 1/8th of them that are still fucking virgins.

There are loud sluts at college, but those are just that: loud sluts.

Quit crying faggot, you don't have proof of the contrary. What do want, a full study? Do you really think (((they))) would let us know how prevalent lesbianism is? Earlier in the thread you talk about how this is a common thing and now you're acting like it isn't? I'm honestly not sure what your point is here.
No one's saying that they stay with it, but almost everyone who has a clue will tell you that they experiment around A LOT
It's not just his class. Ask around if you're so skeptical. He's not even claiming it's necessarily representative, but more than it's a "it's more common than you think" situation.

God damn when I thought you couldn't get more retarded. Many people in that age group DON'T GO TO COLLEGE so they slut it up less. Plus this is self-reported, how many of those do you think did it once "but that doesn't count" so they answer zero for their partner count? You need to get out more if you think 1/8 of millennial women are virgins.

Those are the ones that openly identified as queer. I'm sure there were more who were closet cases and fooling around. Also a lot, and I mean A LOT, fantasize about that sort of stuff such as watching lesbian porn or kissing their friends in the mouth etc, and would be more than happy to rugmunch if given the chance.

As the guy here said it's millennials and younger that have completely and utterly lost it. I would actually say that normal straight girls are the minority in that age group.

They want us to think it's MORE common than it is, retard.
search "naive realism"
Im aware of that, but women who go to college aren't terrible that different.
hell, one study (only citing a bit over 700 so not entirely representative) found it was as high as 39% of those in college.

that were virgins

also, self reporting is a non argument. they're doing it anonymously. there's no reason to assume ANY were like "i had my vag penetrated but it doesn't count, lol"

A lot try it once or twice, but a relationship rarely if ever comes out of it or lasts a considerable amount of time.
a lot fantasize about being raped too.
straight girls watch lesbian porn too. see

life isn't like a porno, man. Just because the media pushes the idea of college girls spending all their time getting fucked does not make it even close to reality.

This may be hard for you to understand, but no. Certain activists may want you to think it, but the system as a whole knows that we'd be lynching fags and dykes in the streets it we knew how many there were and who they were. They still benefit from being in the closet in a way to get what they think is equal treatment.
I could say the same of you, you don't want to see the truth of what goes on. Lesbians aren't something that could ultimately take over every female, but it's just enough to cause a gender imbalance in milennials, more so than any promiscuous "Chad" could.
Okay, you clearly need to stop posting and lurk more, if you think that college isn't a major factor in negatively influencing young people, especially women.
This, like we were talking about, is not a good sample. But if you look around, and talk to young women, nowadays, and observe their behavior, very few of them are virgins. Even ugly landwhales still find a way to get laid. I would be surprised if the real number was as high as 5% by age 20, let alone 25.

So the self-reports of 1-in-4 women were raped shouldn't be scrutinized either? After all, what reason do they have to lie?

It's to coddle themselves to live the lie that they're still pure.

Why I am arguing with this histrionic dyke at midnight

How does Pornhub know what gender a person is when viewing their website? The only accurate measurement would people declaring it on their profile, meaning the data is based on individuals who made account on a pornography website, meaning the data is based on a sample of degenerates.

When you realize this, it's no wonder that our generation is so fucked.

Pornhub's data should be taken with a grain of salt. If we were to get a better representation it would be lower on the list, plus lesbian is a whole orientation in itself while the myriad of other shit can fall under straight. Still, the fact that it's so high is alarming, though.

How would we feel if gay was the top for men? We'd probably be having a collective aneurysm and rant about faggot numales the whole thread, I sure would be. But because it's women, people go to all sorts of lengths to rationalize around it. It's pretty funny.

lol, no they don't. and we probly wouldn't. The more gays there appear to be, the more support they get, because straight liberals would see that as a bigger chunk of society being oppressed.

im not assuming you're ignorant or dumb. I'm sure you have a perfectly logical reason for thinking what you think. But I'm actually making a supporting argument while you're flinging insults.
certainly not. While women are more likely to experiment, men are more likely to commit. the current ratio is is damn near 1:1 with slightly more gay men than women. Women ARE more likely to be bi though. But bisexuals tend to marry their opposite gender.

it is, but not in the amount of sex they have. the ones that get swooped up by social justice are usually sluts to begin with. just somewhat sane sluts.

I hate "arguments" like this. Sluts are louder and easier to notice. This is not news to ANYONE. The ones not sleeping around are in the library trying to stay away from annoying sluts.
not by virtue of self reportedness.
they didn't. It was an optional online survey with 2 huge flaws:
1. think about the person who would take such a survey (which was advertised as one about rape). Someone who had an interest in the subject, meaning a disproportionately high number of rape victims, of course.
2. Sex while intoxicated is considered "rape" as well. Anyone who said "yes" to that question was qualified as a rape victim.
It's actually surprising the number was so low.

`>>8746241
If gay porn had been highest for men, I would conclude that Pornhub is a gay porn website.

Surprise most women have zero concept of loyalty! who would have guessed.

It's because lesbian porn isn't as gross.

Also, is it just people that identify themselves on these sites?

Someone watched the TL;DR video.

Not the kind you'd want to have anything to do with.

This has an upper limit though. They benefit from being a "poor persecuted small minority" so if it stays at a modest level but not so high that it would interfere with birthrates, everything's fine to the goyim. But the problem is, it does interfere with the birthrates. So they'll never let us know the real numbers. But many individuals will want to be in the closet for whatever reason, so the actual percentage will always be higher than what would be reported.

Have yet to see anything. I've provided my logic and all I'm getting is "that's not true because my experience conflicts with it". So there's not much to be said. I didn't believe it either until I saw, it was like taking the red pill all over again.

One to one? I hate to say this but are you kidding me? Slightly more gay men? This is the exact type of sheltered shit I'm talking about. It's a much better deal for women to be a dyke than a man a faggot. Women are more likely to be bi, and bisexuals in theory marry the opposite gender. But in my experience they're more likely to be full homo. Do we really know if the bi women will come home? Previously they would but we've reached a new level of decline in this age. Trump can fix some things but I don't think the culture overall is going to shift back that much.

Not always, many times there have been perfectly fine women who were corrupted by college. It's much more accessible to them there, away from parents and responsibilities.

Too bad. Sluts are more noticeable but I keep hearing this myth about how there's this large group of non-slut non-dyke women in college. Guess what, after five years, I can tell you that's bullshit. The ones in the library are sluts too, but that's the thing, as you figured out, they're more quiet about it.

That part is a pretty accurate description for why it's bullshit. But there's a similar reason for why you shouldn't trust any survey about women's sexual partner count, or any claim from any woman about her partner count. She's going to lie, either to make herself look like less of a slut if it's public, or to convince herself she isn't a slut if it's private.

Also there are a lot of degenerates that roleplay as women

Not a problem when they're also pushing the "overpopulation" myth.
Not in an anonymous survey. Unless you're including those who are in denial to themselves, in which case they're straight.
that's YOUR argument, actually.
i have provided statistics which you brush off because of YOUR PERSONAL EXPERIENCE

pic related

faggots are still slightly more common.

correct
see above

not a particularly significant amount. Social justice appeals most to the worst society has to offer. That's kinda what it's there for.

i was more or less being symbolic there. What im saying is the good ones aren't looking for guys' attention. you don't meet a lot of them because they aren't there for the social aspect of college. They go to class, do their work, then they leave. They aren't talking to you because they aren't looking to make friends.

do you have even the slightest shred of evidence to back that up?

...

Yes but still, every straight goy wants a mate and if they figure out that there's a large imbalance in homosexuals in the genders certain somebodies could face some unfortunate persecution… wouldn't want that now would we. The jew would rather stab us from behind then straight on.

Not talking about that survey, I'm talking about hypothetical data. People can be in denial to themselves yet still be a fag/dyke.

That's both of our arguments. I state my experience, another user agrees with my experience, you on the other hand disagree because of your experience. There's nothing to be said unless one of us experiences something to change our opinion.

You haven't provided ANY statistics on how many homosexuals there are, and there aren't any studies on what it would be on a college campus. So you can only really go on experience and a general feel. Even the official numbers I've seen still admit there's more lesbians than faggots. Even then,
They've been lying about numbers for millennia. We just went through a whole election where if we believe what (((they))) told us, Hillary would be president.

Of course you ignore that I said that I hated to go there and yet you think that's a legitimate point anyway. gg well done user 10/10

Again "no". Faggots are far more fringe of a group, and as I said even official sources admit that lesbians are more common. I know TRS seems like they're in the majority at the moment, but while they are just some faggot forum, dykes managed to infiltrate every university in the country. Do a survey of how many homo couples you see. Maybe even watch a few videos on how to tell if someone is gay, for men and women. Then you tell me what you see. Even if it verifies what you already believe, I want you to do that and see for yourself, because I'm far from the only one to come to this conclusion. Dykes are everywhere but it doesn't seem that way because they do a better job at appearing straight than a faggot does, who stands out like a sore thumb.

There are very few women who come out of college unpozzed though. If there are any that go in fine, which there are, they lose that after one semester. It still has had a significant impact on our country because it corrodes to the outside.

Gee even your best case scenario sounds like a boring cunt to me. Usually that type of girl is a big red flag to be one of the closet dykes too. Back to square one.

There's either ones that are loud sluts, ones that are quiet sluts, ones that are quiet dykes and ones that are vocal dykes, in order of frequency, and after that you get girls who are neither, of which many are fat, deformed, shitskins or insane. And those who aren't are engaged to their farmer boyfriend from back home that she would never tell you about unless you ask her out. Which is wonderful for them, in all honesty, but it means there's jack shit for anyone who's looking for something serious, and there's WAY more men who would fit that bill. Welcome to university in the current year.

She's a woman. What other evidence do I need? Women gonna women.

I'm gonna start saging because this is off topic and I may go to bed soon and respond tomorrow afternoon

let me put it this way:
The kikes want more white gay kids, yes?
Well normalizing homosexuality is a damn good way of accomplishing that.

You have 2 choices here:
homosexuality is a choice. in which case, "being in denial" loses all meaning.
it is not. in which case, college has nothing to do with it.

Initially that was my argument, I was stating my disagreement therefore initiating the discussion. But then I brought statistics when the discussion was actually had.

i provided stats relating to how often women have sex in general, which was in response to your argument that women "are being passed around."
as far as homosexuality goes, it's between 1 and 2 percent (funny, before looking it up just now i assumed it was around 4%). but that's not college exclusive. 13% of college girls reported having a same sex experience in college and most of them still identified as straight.
women are more likely to EXPERIMENT.
for the purposes of normalizing it.
it was shit used as a reply to shit. don't say it if you don't want me to mock you for it.
and that's horseshit. they don't say that
again, stop inhaling the media lies. they want to encourage campus sex culture by making it seem like it's what everyone else is doing
the best women are quite women. they are selective about who they spend time with, just as nature intended. if you manage to hit it off with one, they're a great chat. they choose not to involve themselves with pozzery though
You're literally just confirming your own biases here. get your head out of your ass and stop saying everything's a red flag.
the ugly/insane ones tend to be the biggest sluts. They also buy into the kikeshit that everyone's fucking around in college and fantasize about some chad giving them the time of day.
Seriously man, you're embarrassing yourself.
People are LESS sexually active than they used to be.
you read that right: LESS.
People are having sex later and less often now than they have for 40 years. Both men and women.

Alright, can't hold it in anymore. Gonna start the insults:
You seem like a beta cuck who was never good with girls. You see all the couples around you and think to yourself "why can't that be me?" You hold women in contempt because you never found your perfect waifu and even if you did you know she probably wouldn't feel the same about you.
Sad.

Go ahead.

u wot m8

This has been well known for a while. Yes, they do. For some reasoning behind it, see

If you go on >>>/cuckquean/ there is an actual community of women on here who have a thread up talking about porn and they all seem to agree that they don't like most porn because the industry is exploitative and abusive. Lesbian porn is probably less exploitative and less degrading so women can watch it and feel more comfortable.

It isn't as gross to YOU because I assume you're a straight man. A STRAIGHT WOMAN on the other hand isn't gonna watch lesbian porn the same way a straight man isn't gonna watch gay porn.

I was being sarcastic. "Straight" women that watch lesbian porn are not fucking straight.

I know you were attempting to mock me, the only way it could have been more obvious would be a smug anime face.
I'm telling you it's the truth.

Do you even listen to what you're saying? Would you ever watch gay porn if there was no good porn around? No? Oh that's right, it's because you're STRAIGHT and two men doing each other leaves you at best indifferent and at worst disgusted.

Women don't watch porn in the same way men do. Women tend to be more sexually flexible and aren't nearly as disgusted by lesbians as men are by faggots. The important thing is that a woman's pleasure is given priority, unlike how most porn works.
The attractiveness of the people in it is less of an issue too, since they're just going to picture themselves in one of their places anyway. And believe it or not, women don't want to be treated like a fuckdoll. While they are often more submissive they want it to be something more than "this guy with a huge dick is gonna painfully stretch the most sensitive orifice in your body."

So you agree that those who watch lesbian porn are not straight?

They're straight as in they would only have sex with men.
It's not the people they're attracted to in porn. It's the story behind it.

"Stupid jew religion"
Foundation of our civilization largely hated by jews and every powerful media degenerate alive who isn't a jew and virtually all homosexuals and I could go on. Have you actually thought all this through beyond sperging on materialist hyper literalist interpretations of the word? Or are you gonna have a neitzschian mental breakdown when you realize that materialism is ultimately nihilism? Or do you larp something else which will never influence hundreds of millions of White Christians in the slightest?

So here's my way to see it.

Women are more sexually open because they haven been prepared to share and attract the top men.

It is a fact that during story like 30% of the men would take the 70% of the women. Even when religious orders would force couples to be monogamous women would still go after the top men and it would be usual for just a few men to have the most children. After wars, women would go after their conquerors (like french women going after german soldiers in WW2 or japanese women after american after WW2). If you go and look for polygamous communities they ALWAYS are one man with several women, like for example harems and stuff. Even in monkeys communities you usally see the alpha monkey with several females at the same time, and they simply sharing the male.

So here's the thing, women always go for the alpha man, even if he's an asshole that will forget about them, they simply go after him. In some instances, sharing the alpha man with more women was usual, what would lead to promiscuous actions during sex. The alpha man will enjoy more fucking two women than one, so women that could turn "bi" during sexual relationships would help them to procreate with alphas and get their children.

If you see now any current modern teen going through puberty, you can see how there's a natural distance in straight guys from each other when it comes to touching, caring and stuff like that. Men don't do that, they find it naturally digusting unless they are homosexual. This however doesn't happen with women. It's actually really normal for women to see them caring and "playing" with each other during the first years of puberty in a low sexual tone because they guys from the same age take longer to get into puberty and they don't see them as men yet. So, it's normal to see girls at that age dating or going with guys a few years older than them, but if they can't do that they usually get pretty "close" to their friends, something that no homosexual men don't do. You can hear about this "phase" in women a lot, and it basically goes away as soon as some alpha male comes and give them the dick.

At the end of the day most "pure lesbians" are actually girls with daddy issues, ugly and/or simply fucked up in the head that couldn't get the penis, and because for them biologigally getting the dick is so important they end getting frustated and going for degenerate relationships.
While men, like people in prison or the old greek that would spend shit ton of time out of their cities without women around, can end doing homosexual relationships due to frustation trying to find the person with more feminine characteristics, women will do the same, but fucked in a emotional level since for them getting a partner is an emotional necessity compared to men, whom fucking is just a temporal necessity like it can be eating food or breathing.

Homosexuality for men come from a failure at birth in my opinion. The same way a boy can be born with some kind of deformity or issue, they can be born homosexual. However in women is different, I'm pretty sure that most "lesbians" are just confused girls missing an alpha male that guides them.

I see where you're getting at, and I think in most cases that excuse doesn't apply. Women who watch lesbian porn are often in the "female porn actresses are better looking" crowd, which is an incredibly fucking gay thing to say.

It's an interesting thought that some women might watch it for contextual factors such as the story, but then again, lesbian porn has bad stories just like straight porn does. But lets pretend for a minute that they're slightly better. You look up the data in the OP and you clearly see that lesbian porn is vastly overrepresented. If it was about contextual factors such as the story you would see a lot more variety in their searches, since anything goes.

In most cases those that watch lesbian porn do so because they like what they see better. Which makes them gay.

As always, the main reason for women to do anything is FEELZ. Watching certain porn makes them FEEL, everything else is secondary.

I will explain. The 1-10 hotness scale is decile system. Consider the following situation, a ranking of the women at a local sports bar:
10. Jen is hotter than Meg.
9. Meg is hotter than Sara.
8. Sara is hotter than Emma.
7. Emma is hotter than Jolie.
6. Jolie is hotter than Crystal.
5. Crystal is hotter than Hortence.
4. Hortence is hotter than Vivian.
3. Vivian is hotter than Tammy.
2. Tammy is hotter than Wanda.
1. Wanda is the ugliest woman in the room.

So, say there was a nuclear attack, and everyone except those in this one bar survived. Now Jen would be a 10/10, Meg would be a 9/10, Sara would be an 8/10, and so on. And if you had more, then they would be allocated evenly into each of those 10 groups.

Now, I am in favor of another system, but this is the 1-10 hotness scale. Perhaps you should create a penis hardness scale - indeed, perhaps you have conflated the two.

straight porn often has NO story. Lesbian porn, however, often has one attached. And even in the cases where one isn't stated, one can often be made much more easily than in straight porn where it's just two people fucking. With lesbians taboo gets involved. And taboo makes EVERYTHING sexier to a woman.

That's the thing. Narrative is so diverse that no singe one gets represented. Any particular narrative would be dwarfed in comparison to broader themes like "gangbang" or "bondage."

and lesbian porn has more feels.

Perhaps you should create a penis hardness scale - indeed, perhaps you have conflated the two.
I conflate them as I consider them one in the same. Hotness is not relative. Not any more than aesthetics in art. If all art was shit, all art would be shit. If all women were ugly, all women would be ugly.

meant to greentext that

Dykes and along those mannish-looking women alike had abnormal development in regions of the brain to that as a man that associates with visual stimuli, due to hormone imbalance during birth.

Pre-natal hormones such as androgen are common mostly with male fetuses and known for permanent developments in certain brain regions. One region for receptors associated with violence (this fits well with the fact that dykes are more prone to domestic violence than straight or homosexual couples), another region contains the receptors that react for visual stimulis (which why men are easier to arouse through imagery, like erotica, like pornography).

This is why so many of these women who look at pornography are likely bull-dykes, hideous abominations that barely pass as female, or just sluts and promiscuous girls with a shaky past of sexual abuse. Either way I can't think of any healthy female looking at pornography, because it's a abnormality to the world of biology and evolution.

Lesbianism is a fucking mental illness.

Sure is easier to get turned on by a woman than a hairy fat neckbeard numale.
Brb gonna body sculpt

Bullshit. Both straight and lesbian porn are equally terrible in terms of story. At the very least, lesbian porn very very rarerly has such eloborate stories to support its massive overepresentation.

That's gay. If a woman is excited by the taboo aspect of it, she's at the very least bisexual.

You're interpreting the data wrong. What they tell us, is that it's clear women that watch porn place greater empasis on the sex of the participants being both female, than contextual factors.

Seonding this. Holla Forums's obsession with alphaness never makes any sense to me. I look at someone like my grandfather who was married to the same woman for lik 60 years. Yet, when I think of his personality, he wasn't alpha nor beta. He was just an honest and stable man. My grandmother wasn't unpopular before dating him either. Blue eyes and large breast made for plenty of guys being interested. Yet what she was able to see, appreciate and desire in my grandfather was that stability.

you may be interested in the socio-sexual "ranks" posited by Vox Day. he talks about how "alpha" and "beta" is a limited approach to describing people, and adds the ranks of "gamma," "delta," "sigma," and "omega" to the mix.

your granddad sounds like a delta. solid, dependable, salt-of-the-earth type guy who knew himself, knew his worth, knew his place and purpose in this world, and was confident in himself without being arrogant. delta's essentially make the world go round, because they take care of the day-to-day shit that keeps civilization functioning.

the delta approach is also somewhat outdated nowadays. beforehand, you had to essentially impress the woman's father. now, you have to impress the woman directly, something alpha's (and sigmas) do much better than delta's or beta's. since women are constantly bombarded with (((encouragement))) to forgo family and settling down until they are 30+ years old, the alpha approach that focuses on natural feminine hypergamy is the dominant way to get laid nowadays.

rare is it to find the woman who appreciates a solid, dependable guy, at least in your average urban center. smaller town areas of the US still have those women, but constant exposure to talmudvision propaganda makes it hard to keep them from being exposed to the jewry that constantly undermines our society.

watch the video linked here:

There's many more like it. far more than in straight porn. Straight porn is often more in the range of satire. The thin veneer of causality is quite literally a joke. By that I mean you are supposed to laugh at it. Lesbian porn is more prone to conflict and character driven storylines.
But they aren't attracted to women, just as women with rape fantasies don't actually want to be raped.
Have you tried looking up porn with a story in it on pornhub? "story" brings up some results but they aren't good ones. Many women probably have looked up something along those lines. but the results were always shit so they defaulted to what they know they can get a good rub to.
Now let's think about what you would type in for something more story oriented that's not the word "story."
"nurse," maybe? "slave?" "witch," "vampire," "demon" might get popular. The point im making is there's so many things one would type in and it might be a different thing every day. This is as opposed to what they would type in every day. Straight porn, as I have said, is often a joke as far as story goes. After a few days women would realize that. They'd also realize that lesbian porn is much better in terms of story. From there, they start typing "lesbian" along with whatever else they are in the mood for at the time. But the common denominator is "lesbian" and that's what gets a huge chunk overall. Whatever story they want only gets whatever fraction she chooses. She's not gonna watch the same story every time she wants to cum.

Does anyone have the alpha, beta, gamma, omega +/- chart? I can't find it. That would explain it for this user.

this one image search "alpha beta gamma male chart"

No, not that one. The one I'm thinking of is more extensive, has pictures, and a plus/minus distinction for each tier.

Found it

What?

There is no such thing, objectively

The ideal human culture is European.

Can you prove any of it?

How can you claim that women are immune to a mental deformity? Why would they be? Mutation and randomness dictates that women should be succeptible to every mental issue men have.

Ideal by whom and for who?

We were talking about lesbians, same idea is with faggots aswell. They are positevily reinforced the faggotry-behaviour until they become addicted.

It's part of the agenda and some fucking fools on Holla Forums who probably started out with the feminist/PUA-entry level of shit hasn't realised. It's the idea of pushing white society into mongrelisation. Were you have to fuck around, you have to be an asshole, you have to be ((alpha)) and actively act against your own people to climb onto the societal ladder, pump and dump the ever increasing numbers of whores and single mothers, until white society look nothing different than the black ghettos with their gangsta-culture and all that shit.

Just being stable and normal, taking care of your woman on family while just having a normal job, somehow that's not enough nowadays. I wonder if it's yet another ((coincedence)).

Deciles are not incompatible with absolute data.

Look back here, and read "is hotter than" instead as "is taller than":

you're autistic
plz don't shoot up LA fitness

You're missing the point. They want more white gay kids, but they don't want us thinking that there's a very large amount. If they weren't afraid of that they would just claim something absurd like 25% or 50%, but that would be disastrous for society and I think even most normalfags realize that.

This is a complete non-sequitur. Homosexuality is a choice, but people who are easily manipulated find themselves doing it in college.

Which had nothing to do with the central argument but could still be relevant. And it's a statistic that I find very hard to believe.

Gonna combine the next part into a paragraph
You have a completely different definition of a lesbian than what I do. You seem to think experimenting is just something that girls do and it doesn't mean anything. If a guy kisses a guy or sucks a dick, he's a faggot. Same thing goes for women. You fuck around with girls, you are a dyke. End of story. This is also why you won't get an actual number because the kike surveyers agree with you but any sane person would realize that if you really aren't homosexual, you don't experiment, period. 1 to 2% makes sense on a national level but if you narrow down to women in breeding age (18-30), who are also white, and in areas like cities and colleges, ie the only demographic I'm talking about here, a high percentage of them experiment, it may be 13%, it may be higher or lower. It doesn't really matter, but it's a higher rate than most people realize.
You don't get to do that, sweethearts.

They lie about numbers to normalize it, like on a national level. But you'll never see a breakdown on where this 1, 2, or 4% homosexual live in or what demographic they are. Because that would show alarming numbers that would panic people.
At one point I saw something that said that the rate of lesbians was nearly double that of faggots and that was commonly what I would see claimed for years. For what it's worth I can't find that and now what's being claimed is the opposite. You will get so many conflicting numbers on shit like this that I would not trust what you read, but what you see and what your gut feeling is. And what I see conflicts with what I've been told.

They encourage it but the new media lie is how people are less promiscuous. Even with projections you can't compare people who are decades apart in age in a metric that changes over their lives.
Let me tell you something. These quiet women, they have the same potential to be a whore as any other woman. And there's a lot less of them than you claim.
I'm going off of events that actually turned out to be the case. The only thing that keeps them away from the hetero poz is that secretly they're involved in the homo poz. There's too much distractions and many of them have convinced themselves that being a dyke is less degenerate.
They're one of the types, yes. But even the quiet ones are still sluts most of the time. You think the hot girl doesn't get hit on multiple times a day? You think she says no to all of them? You think those she says yes to are upstanding members of society that she marries? Think again.
Again with this kike lie. It's another trick they're using to shame to get people to be EVEN MORE sexually active. There's no proof other than "this model that we used projects that millennials fall just short of Gen X even though millennials have already reached a high number while Gen X stayed constant throughout their lives and we're assuming that millennials will slow down". Until it's all said and done we can't come to that conclusion.

This ran long, 1/2

I'm surprised it took you this long.
sums up your attitude perfectly that you think if someone has issues with the way things are means that they must just be some beta, not that there are actual issues or anything.

Let me tell you something, I say this not to brag, but to give you context, you can believe me or not. I've currently got two women that I could have any moment that I want, but I wouldn't touch with a ten-foot pole. The reason for that is, one of them is one of these pseudo-dykes that I'm talking about, and the other is just your run-of-the-mill whore. I've had others too, but for example those were things like kikes or shitskins. This isn't a case of "that's just who you attract". This is pretty representative of my surroundings, unfortunately, which is why I'm changing that soon. Any time a woman shows interest I turn away because I know it's something fleeting and she's only looking to fuck around. I get along a lot better with the bigger whores who are not interested because at least they won't bullshit me. This is the group I have to choose from, and I'm simply saying how awful they are. I can't speak to what the non-college crowd did.

Now let me have a turn.
I think you're a woman, based on the fact that you know from first-hand experience about this whole genre of lesbian porn that's directed at women. I think you're in denial that you're a dyke, but you're ever so slightly aware so you deflect criticism from them. I think that's the reason why you champion this nice quiet virgin girl in college myth, which is exactly that, a myth. You don't want to admit what a major cunt you are so you create this whole ideal that you can insert yourself in. I think that if you just ignore your failures and shove it over to men then it means that you don't have to do anything to change.

Alternatively, you're some poor chump who's been reeled in by his girlfriend and you think that makes you more manly than the guys who aren't whipped. Reality will hit you hard in the balls when you realize your girlfriend can be just as much of a cunt as any woman. Or you don't have a girlfriend at all and you're a beta NEET who thinks that if you buy into this fantasy then someday you'll be rewarded with pussy. Both of these are even worse.

Regardless, a faggot is a faggot and a dyke is a dyke. More women are experimenting with other women? Those women are dykes. It's not rocket science.

i didn't say they were.
i know what you said, but who being hotter than who is no relevant in terms of absolutes.

no they wouldn't. that's absurd and they know no one would believe them.
then those "in denial" aren't gay you retard.
actually, the promiscuity of modern women was central to your argument. you are believing in falsehoods.
that's a retarded definition has has absolutely no bearing on demographics. Your whole argument is that lesbianism reduces the number of mates. experimentation does not do that.
im pretty sure the common narrative is all the girls are fucking around, not barely over 1/8th
no, it would show that they're a non issue and literally a fringe group/
yes, focus on the feelies, not realies.
except a lot of their arguments hinge on sex being MORE common.
nigger, think for a minute.
we aren't the only people who know the college stereotypes of everyone fucking everyone. there are a HUGE amount of girls who heard of that too, and dont want any part of it. They just want a degree and already know to stay the fuck out of the humanities.
you're going off personal experiance filtered through your own personal lens which you craft to confirm your own biases
they do
she does.
no. the kikes want you to think everyones having sex.

i think you have a distorted view of the way things are. you fell for that demoralization shit and think "every woman's a whore" is a fucking redpill.

You're extremely autistic. Good God!

Nice argument.
Tell me more about how an ugly girl can be a 10/10 by virtue of all the other girls being uglier.

I shall, and easily:
Every woman in existence is ugly, were it not for an enormity of aids. Truly, by the standards of pic related there is no woman even worthy of beholding!

Eh, that statue isn't even that good looking. The pic we were initially arguing about was better.
Istand by my stance that if every woman were ugly, every woman would be a 5 or below.
The makeup a woman wears is a reflection of the woman's artistic taste. I know we're arguing aesthetics here so this is a bit of a non sequitur, but a woman's makeup doesn't simply enhance her physical appearance. It gives you a shadow of a glimpse at what lies within.

Also, remember that my whole point was that no one could actually be a 10/10. So you just provided a supporting case for my argument.

Robots will be the wives and childbearers of the near future.

My waifu is infinitely more beautiful than that.

You're overlooking the fact that most niggers are inner city filth who aren't nearly as into technology as white people.

No, a 10/10 refers to a segment of the population. In terms of true beauty, no woman has ever possessed it at all.

Beauty is binary, and all the Earth is 0.

You have a fondness for inbred prostitutes.

She's a WHORE!

In this case, niggers know more than you do.

Right, millions of niggers are out there stealing computers to watch pornhub. Or… You could just accept that our people have become corrupted filth. It's the truth. Denying it won't fix the situation.

Your mother, fleshling.

as much as you say it, that doesn't make it true
lolno
I have the same disgust for caked on makeup that any rational person shares for modern art consisting of uncoordinated paint globs.
Someone who leaves the house looking like a Picasso painting isn't someone I want to waste my time with.
They either have shit taste or such lack of confidence in their own beauty that they cover a potentially beautiful canvas with obnoxious colors.

The philosophers held beauty like truth, and above it. Truth, you may recall, is binary.

Soon user, very soon. Take your pick.

Very late to this thread but you seem to be following it, so answer me this: if story is really the reason women (straight or otherwise) like lesbian porn, why do companies like Girlsway (and the entire industry) market lesbian porn to them specifically? If the women are actually straight and just want more story, why wouldn't they just make straight porn with more story and "focus on the woman's pleasure?" Why isn't that genre more popular with women than lesbian porn?

We know from science what women want. Women want money. But suppose they had money taken care of, what do women want? Status. They want their men decorative, of course. But it's also important to a woman for a guy to be stupid enough for her to control him.

What women do NOT want in a man is quirkiness. They don't want a real person, etc. They aren't humanists.

That doesn't really answer my question (or the topic of this thread) though. Even assuming that's true when it comes to relationships, it doesn't explain porn preferences, which are a raw expression of sexual desire. Barring a few role-playing exceptions, porn has nothing to do with status, money, stability, or any of the other things you could reasonably say women want out of life in general; it's just about getting off.

it's true it's also why women from eastern europe are prettier than other women from for example england, they got sexually selected for beauty more often due to the pillagings

jew

The thread's "question" is:
That's a "vague" question.

As far as your question, the attraction of homosexuality is just down to "bargaining" in a situation of low sexual activity.

Traditionally a man would marry and then he would fuck his wife 3 times a day, with a bonus surprise fuck in the middle of some nights.

Needless to say, women who were fucked so regularly were not in the least attracted to women, as they had their needs fulfilled.

Today, however, work keeps men away at noon, and the electric lightbulb keeps them awake and busy for far more than 12 hours.

So, if you want to blame anyone, blame the automobile and the lightbulb.

Mere lack of sexual satisfaction can't explain the phenomenon. Even if I buy your claim that men in that past dicked their wives 3+ times daily (clearly a stretch) and that they simply aren't having enough sex now to be satisfied with men, why isn't the same trend seen in those men? Your argument could be a good explanation for why folks in general watch more porn now than ever, but it doesn't explain the difference in porn-watching habits shown in OP's charts.

If women are straight and just sexually deprived, one would expect that they would watch straight porn to make up the difference (just like men do).

Holy shit the amount of mental gymnastics you go through to justify your raging dykery is insane.

Btw you STILL haven't answered his question

Different IDs, user. b0dd9d is not the one to whom I posed the question anyway.

1. Stop watching porn
2. These stats are tainted, given the 'suggestions' made by these companies :^) over the years have skewed the userbase's tastes through promoting specific catagories which align with certain (((interests)))

WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU? THE BIGGEST PIECE OF SHIT IDIOT I EVER CAME UPON? YES. Anyhow, your 3 year old link to the dailymail (fuck you for not giving us an archive link and giving them money from multiple clicks) is quite the retard move. Did you read it or just post it? Not sure if you really think that selfies and soft-porn (40% each do this) would be classified as porn yourself, but I don't. It's not a sneaky activity where people diddle themselves in private to it, unless lol they do, but then again some people fucking cum to a tomato being sliced open. Okay if you want to take any of dailymail's statistics to heart, then 9% is your mark - women who watch porn everyday. 96% watch porn with a partner? Who the fuck are these degenerates? 15% watch porn once a month. Once a fucking month, I have to watch porn because this fucking site likes to sear my eyes every hour with an asshole or a fucking gore shot. When the fuck did people decided men have higher libidos? It's always been the case than women are the sluts fucking everyone and everything (sorry which sex are the ones known for being prostitutes?) otherwise they wouldn't have needed to be put on the marriage leash.

How about fucking talk to a women do you don't get askew thoughts in your head. Because surely before looking this amazing article up you thought the opposite. Because their stupid statistics are made up! "A new survey" of what 10 women? It has no data!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! FUCK YOU.

Calling a fucking selfie video porn is despicable. Porn is not just some random person fucking another, it can be art too, really it should be art because how else are your going to turn the watcher on?

Well philosophers aren't infallible.
And philosophers didn't all think the same things

More women means more potential for women to identify with someone. Bondage, for example (which is also searched more by women than men) generally has two clear positions: dom and sub. A man in either role excludes women who want to take that role.

Two problems with that theory:

1. Doesn't explain why straight men don't watch gay porn for the same reason.

2 (and this also informs #1 as I see it). "Identifying" with one of the people in some porn you're watching involves the entire situation, not just that person and his/her pleasure. A man watching straight porn doesn't just get off because he's imagining himself fucking something, he gets off because he's imaging himself fucking a woman, which is what he desires. If there are two ends to that equation, self-inserting as the woman would mean imagining himself getting dicked by another man, which is obviously undesirable.

Similarly, when a woman self-inserts as a female porn actress, she imagines the entire scenario, including what the other actor is doing. To be most generous to your argument, let's assume a generic oral scene (because frankly every other type of lesbian sex is more obviously informed by lesbian desires): clearly a woman can self-insert as receiving oral sex, and debatably it doesn't matter all that much who's on the other end (though I would still argue that it does). However, how is lesbian porn in this respect any more preferable than straight porn (it must be, because as you've agreed it's more popular)?

According to your reasoning, it's preferable because the viewer can also self-insert as the one giving oral sex. As a woman. To a woman. The fact that eating a girl out as potential fantasy is a selling point and an improvement for the product is obviously gay.

:^) Because men and women are different. I mean, look how fucking fagged your mind is that you don't know this.

Actually, he had multiple. I ignored the stupider aspects, and discussed various. Obviously, men and women are different. But why not add dialog to straight pornography marketed for men, so as to broaden the base? I'll explain it simply, in this absurd question:

Calm yo titties, trips-man. Say what you mean to say more clearly and more simply. Also, realize that most people have members of family, friends, who regulate their interactions with other people. A lot of you hotheaded types seem to be unaware that some people aren't willing to self-destruct over petty matters, as you are.

Obviously men and women are different, and I've never suggested otherwise. My entire argument repeatedly points out as much; I'm just questioning your explanation of those differences.

Men are more into aesthetics.
correct
Submission. Women are quite often submissive.

And then we can talk about the whole chicken and egg situation that's going on.
Lesbian porn is far more variant on narrative, while straight porn is generally satire and satire alone. now, would a woman watch straight porn with a story? Sure. But is there a lot of it out there? No.
Girslway, for example, was a response to the fact women are watching lesbian porn, probably by a woman who partakes herself. It's molded largely to their desires under the assumption women are watching lesbian shit. The women watching it default to lesbians because that's something that can consistently get them of, as opposed to straight porn which veers towards 50/50.

The answer is mystical :^)
you can't handle the truth

Oh, but on a practical note, I see none of you are aware of how much more body-focused a woman is. On HER body. Every waking hour, she is much more aware of her body than you are at the most self-conscious. When you are using your computer you very rarely think "I'm someone using a computer!" but women do think this very often, and similar thoughts.

I agree. They want to identify with a woman who is attractive.

Men and women are different but not THAT different. Your rationalization is unecesserily convoluted when it's much simpler to deduce that "straight" women who watch lesbian porn, are in fact, NOT STRAIGHT.

We already have evidence that women get at least as much of a turn on from naked women as they do from men. Whether that's cultural or not is up for debate, but you can't deny that it's very very common.

True, but doesn't explain the entirety of it. Men also enjoy psychological aspects of porn, and the fact that a women is involved is a key part of that.

Again, this fails to account for why lesbian porn in particular should be any more appealing. Why would a straight woman prefer that over submission to a man?

As for chicken and the egg arguments, I think they favor the desire predating the product. If women would really be or happier with straight porn that involves more story and emphasis on the woman's pleasure, such products would have proliferated.

Boils down to the following: if you're claiming that women would prefer the above over lesbian porn, you're saying there is a huge gold mine of an untapped porn market that the industry has mysteriously ignored (unlikely). If you're saying that they either don't really care or even prefer the lesbian porn, you're recognizing that most women are not "straight" in the same way that men understand the term.

This is what I've been getting at as well, and I'm inclined to agree. My experience with human sexuality suggests that men and women consider it fundamentally differently: women are not generally 100% straight or gay in the same way men usually are.

even most normalfags know that shit doesn't work, fortunately. I got a fully bluepilled friend that trusts the CNN and voted Hilldog (some people cling to bullshit no matter how many times you destroy their arguments), and he would like to be a girl, but even he knows that going for the (((surgery))) wouldn't achieve anything other than making him a mutilated male. All the genuine trannies I know were weird in the head since birth, so it's probably not something that can be pushed onto you by degeneracy and propaganda.

It's no question that women are more sexually flexible than men. But most women would only actually fuck a man.
I made the analogy before about how it's been found most women have rape fantasies. Does that mean women want to be raped?
There's straight porn with a bit of narrative. the whole thing revolving around "50 shades of gray" should be enough to convince you of that. But in order to get your stuff out there, you have to conform to what women are searching for. Women search for lesbian porn for the reasons I described, so lesbian porn is what they get.
If you watch porn, I'm sure you don't assume you have seen the best porn ever to have been made so far. You just haven't searched the right things to find it. Just like how a woman might LOVE a straight video, but "lesbians" gets them consistent satisfaction.

I would agree to an extent. Women view sexuality in a very different way from men, so the lines are drawn differently as well.

As far as the current scientific data is concerned, women can be gay, they just can't be straight.

In fact, women of all orientations show a consistent sexual bias towards their own sex. If you look at sexuality alone, women are homoflexible or gay.

Of course there's always a chance that there's been a fuck up concerning those studies. I'm just going by what we currently know. On one hand you have lesbian porn being by far the most popular category, on the other hand you have studies measuring arousal, millenial women in colleges being majority queer etc.

You can rationalize one part, but not all of them.

False. You're clearly very inexperienced when it comes to women and/or you're older than me (I'm 26). I've had this discussion pop up many times and at least 70% of women would have no problem munching the rug.

Their main obstacle from what I've gathered, is that they're too shy.

Photoshopped to hell but why are her pants on backwards? As if women buying clothes isnt complicated enough now she needs to see if they fit both ways

I have gone over this in detail in the thread. the short version is women who spend their time talking to "experienced" men are the ones more open sexually. The vast majority of women lead very boring lives and have very boring desires.

This is a pretty bold claim given the vast majority of women only ever have sex with men and only seek sex with men. Doesn't mesh with my personal experience either; as I've seen most women are bisexual with a romantic preference for men (in other words would be happy to have sex with either but would prefer to be in an actual relationship with a man).

user, when we open our sipper, it's often so we can whip out our dick and pee. Women sit when they pee. They too have a zipper. I trust you can connect the dots

Men are simply a lot more available which is a massive time saver. I have a bunch of bisexual friends and acquintances and nearly all of them agree that they prefer women.

That's because the official stats are misleading. A closeted dyke that has fucked 5 women but claims to be straight is counted as straight. Also those stats include women of all age groups while most queers are under 40 and especially under 30.

Their SEXUAL orientation remains the same. Screencap this, and wait until dyke relationships become socially acceptable (right now only "experimenting" is acceptable), and/or artificial sperm becomes a thing, and/or men are removed from positions of power in the name of "equality".

Basically wait until one or all of those factors that have nothing to do with SEXUAL orientation change, and the number of dykes will soar, as it will be more convinient for them to follow their impulses.

Or you could ask me to explain further on specific items in my rant, instead of me laying out every single detail again. I would say that each of my sentences are well thought out and explained, but then again the written form can be hard for some to understand without tone.

So in fact I am replying to the link and what is written in the article, sorry if that wasn't clear. I am not talking about 'dykes' as OP puts it, I am talking about another post they made where they try to back-up their dyke accusations with oh look women look at porn at a 55% rate, which as you look at the article it is just false and has no explanation of who the data is from or how many took the survey or anything.

To talk about that dyke accusation, if you are to believe the dailymail article, only 9% watch porn, of that 9% most of them look up lesbian porn on Porn hub. So to make a conclusion, only lesbians look at porn and only ~7% of the population are 'dykes'.

Fuck you OP, you are the faggot.

I searched the survey - it's Ann Summers sex and lingerie shop of only 300 women. THE DATA IS SKEWED.

So hot/rich women are bi?