Quick question lads, why did they air a film like Idiocracy when it screams eugenics all the time?

Leftists live in hypocritical world of mental gymnastics that their owner, the jew, has created for them.

They believe that civilian gun ownership is unreliable, less reliable than policemans, but they condemn the police and say that police have racial biases.

In same sense, they believe they have higher IQs than right wingers, but if you do a citation of scientific and statistical proof showing how blacks have average IQ of 87 and they always vote for Democrats, well then you are either a racist or IQ doesnt really matter.

When you however point out that Idiocracy has better system in place (voting in smartest people by IQ test) than we do, then they go "oh yea".

Idiocracy is just there to satisfy their fetish of demonizing the "hillibillies", "rednecks", … in their eyes it isnt a ALARM call for eugenics policies because "da Hitlar"

They didn't "air" Idiocracy, it had no promotion and a very limited theatrical release. Fox hated and abandoned it, didn't even air it for critics. It's a cult film.

They DIDN'T want to air Idiocracy.
It got horrible reviews and next to no advertising or budget. Mike Judge (the writer of Idiocracy as well as Beevis and Butthead and King of the Hill) went ahead and made/aired it anyway.

When it first came out, it went from fucking nothing to a cult fanbase and then onto the massive hit it is today.

dunno if you're talking about the release or the broadcasting of the film, but the theatrical release was hampered at the time, no marketing, producers made their own edit (the narrator wasn't in the director's version iirc) and it was only pushed in 7 theaters in america initially. robert rodriguez finished the FX as a favor to help mike judge who had no budget left.

(someone) didn't like it but they couldn't scrap the movie entirely because of contractual obligations with the distributor.

That's not how liberals see it. From my discussions with them on the matter they claim it is proof eugenics is pointless because at the end of the movie it shows people getting smarter (without regard to the fact that only happens temporarily because someone slightly less dumb from the past was frozen and had a couple of kids.)

Then point out that mankind would be doomed except from the frozen man being revived.
Call him what he is, a filrhy hypocrite who should kill himself.

...

The family name is Rothschild.

Bingo. archive.is/iJuRY

THEY TRIED TO SHUT IT DOWN WITH INCOMPETENCE

This.

Mike "The Cuck" Judge wanted to portray the future as being run by white, conservative rednecks while all of the "intelligent" liberals die out due to their lower birth rates. It's no coincidence that this movie came out during Bush II's administration, when neoconservatism was at an all-time high. In truth, this movie is yet another propaganda piece used to encourage minorities and leftists to reproduce in order to avoid the titular "idiocracy."

By the way, King of the Hill was never intended to be a "slice of life" type of show. Judge and (((Greg Daniels))) wanted to mock these "backwards" and "uncultured" southern folk and have the audience laugh at them. Why else would a strawman like Cotton exist in the first place?

Jews warn of their tricks via subtle hints in the media. This lessens the blow to karma when they do perform the trick.

youtube.com/watch?v=P1ULjJ3EqyY

...

At the very least he goes after both sides. He tried making a show that took the piss out of politically correct liberals too but it bombed/vanished like right away.

Judge failed so hard to offend me that he created things I enjoy. Neat!

archive.is/mgjJL

They already do.
They are called TRS, Daily Stormer and Renegade.

kek.

One possible reason, at least for this particular film, might be that it was meant to be liberal virtue signaling.

Like has been said already, it was meant to make fun of poor whites, but the Jews couldn't help themselves and had to have niggers cast.
In an "Idiocracy" scenrio, there would be not whites because whites would be racemixing and fuck anything with genitals. In a much more realistic scenario, white women would buy the Jew's "muh dik" messages that haven't been working too well. If a society starves because they buy the Gatorade marketing scheme, they're dumb enough to buy the race-mixing propaganda too.
Consequently, a mongrelized race like what would really exist in Idiocracy would probably be that stupid. But (((they))) would never show their "everyone is beige" society in a bad light.

Good point.
A realistic depiction of that kind of future wouldn't exactly help their narrative.

It didn't get a theatrical release, it was a straight to video release with no promotion.

what is this fuck i'm looking at? where is the family? which are the parents and which are the kids? this is too meta. Judge underemphasises (or misunderstands) liberal hypocrisy in the very premise. Liberal families tend to be very white - or (((white))) - and internally conservative while acting-out liberal ideals and attempting to force their percieved-inferiors to actually internalize them (by having families like the one pictured).

why would an actual liberal man (who one assumes Judge wanted to mock) marry a woman who is a shade darker and have a son who is a shade lighter?

The son was adopted. They ordered a kid from Africa assuming he'd be black but they got a kid from South Africa.

The son in the Goode Family is adopted. The super liberal parents wanted to virtue signal by adopting a south african baby. Surprise surprise, they got a white south african baby. The joke is that they keep trying to get him to embrace his "african heritage". Even name him "Ubuntu".

Judge just keeps rehashing characters from Beavis and Butthead. Hank Hill is a younger version of their neighbor, the father from the Goode Family is their well meaning but ineffective hippy teacher.

That's actually funny, but not funny enough to build a show around.. more like something you'ld have happen to their neighbors or some shit. And I still dont get why the wife is a shade darker. Again, the premise falls flat if a shit-posting keklord like me cant get the basics of the show from looking at the poster… and faggots like me are trained to spot messages in media.

It seems more like a strawman designed to shield Jews and treasonous whites. In reality, the ones adopting african babies are cucked "conservative" christians. Progressive liberal adults are generally smart enough to know they should only strategically and superficially practice what they preach.

I rate 0/88

Nah, in the show they are horrible people who either are oblivious to their wrong doings or try to out virtue signal each other at people's expence

just watch the pilot.
youtube.com/watch?v=n0fy_gd2lY0

KoTH made me want to become like Hank.

Jesus christ, it looks like his art got even worse in preparation for making this.

...

king of the hill didn't even get canceled for lack of ratings. it was solely to make room for the cleveland show.

Time to watch it again

There was plenty of subliminal cuck propaganda in KOTH.

Not to mention racemixing. White + gook. Best character on the show Dale being cucked by some drunk injun.

dysgenics.

HANK HILL WOULD BE A Holla ForumsLACK