"DIVERSITY" you all know

You all know if you've become initiated.
Diverse societies are in their decline. It doesn't matter if the diversity is a major catalist or a symptom of something worse (germany self hating post communism) when a society has several distinct cultures within it and they are mixed up and continue interacting all the cultures become weaker. The cultures that do not defend themselves, meaning the members that participate and practice in those cultures do not reinforce their traditions while mainintaing a stable or positive birthrate - they die out. The dominant cultures, those which do get reinforced with stable numbers (by birthrate, adopted culture is inferior and usually alien to the people trying to practice it), those cultures that persist and remain uncorrupted - they fight for final dominance ONE dominance. This struggle intensifies the uncertainty and hate in society and before there is a conclusion the society suffers a fatal ending.
Look at countries, regions, groups of people that persist much like they were 1000 years ago - they may adopt all modern technology but they somehow remain THEMSELVES. Their language may change if look at from the outside and dialects may change in number and new ones may be created but to the speakers of that language their ancient texts and oral traditions are still decipherable.
The dying cultures may impart some of their traditions to the conquerors - often the technoloy they have created - but mostly their remnant genes. But they never get reborn.
You must protect what is yours. Your language and your genes, and everything that makes you distnct.
Never apologize, never relativize. Someone thinks your philosophy is archaic or incompatible with modernity? Too bad for them. You clearly exist today in 2017 and they are jealous of your brilliance.

If a government has the power to push diversity without facing a major revolution/rebelleion then it has already become too sickly and the people too lazy to change it. If a goverment tries and receives backlacks then there is still hope.

Other urls found in this thread:

bjp.rcpsych.org/content/201/4/282.abstract?etoc
pnas.org/content/108/4/1262.abstract
ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/abs/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300787
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2012.01138.x/full
www-personal.umich.edu/~axe/research/AxHamm_Ethno.pdf
curis.ku.dk/ws/files/130251172/Dinesen_S_nderskov_Ethnic_Diversity_and_Social_Trust_Forthcoming_ASR.pdf
psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1977-07996-001
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6872626
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4286575/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2668913/
psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/rushtonpdfs/PPPL1.pdf
nature.com/mp/journal/v16/n10/abs/mp201185a.html
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15651931
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11694885
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22713927
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3079384/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22963424
psychologicalscience.org/index.php/news/releases/babies-prefer-individuals-who-harm-those-that-arent-like-them.html
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289605000917
science.sciencemag.org/content/309/5741/1720
ucl.ac.uk/tcga/tcgapdf/Thomas-99-intelligence.pdf
jstor.org/stable/2999198?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/pa-298.pdf
lesacreduprintemps19.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/factor-analysis-of-population-allele-frequencies-as-a-simple-novel-method-of-detecting-signals-of-recent-polygenic-selection-copy.pdf
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1893020/
pritchardlab.stanford.edu/publications/pdfs/RosenbergEtAl02.pdf
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15508000
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15625622
medicalxpress.com/news/2013-10-oral-bacteria-fingerprint-mouth.html
cell.com/current-biology/abstract/S0960-9822(15)00671-5
ln.edu.hk/philoso/staff/sesardic/Race2.pdf
telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/12061787/Intelligence-genes-discovered-by-scientists.html
nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pdf/studies/2009455.pdf
object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/pa746.pdf
heritage.org/research/reports/2011/04/the-myth-of-racial-disparities-in-public-school-funding
pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2013/08/30/black-incomes-are-up-but-wealth-isnt/
data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD/countries
unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/IHS-rates-05012009.pdf
search.proquest.com/criminaljusticeperiodicals/docview/194775428/fulltextPDF/13F966D028A7BE2828D/2
psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/rushtonpdfs/P&E Crime.pdf
business.pages.tcnj.edu/files/2013/07/Durante-thesis-2012.pdf
huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/14/income-inequality-is-at-an259516.html
nytimes.com/2011/05/24/us/24crime.html
online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052748703580904574638024055735590
businessinsider.com/march-labor-force-participation-rate-2013-4
ou.edu/cls/online/lstd2333/pdfs/unit4incomeinequality
psycnet.apa.org/?&fa=main.doiLanding&doi=10.1037/a0026617
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608013001556
emilkirkegaard.dk/en/wp-content/uploads/Is-the-Flynn-effect-on-g-A-meta-analysis.pdf
newrepublic.com/article/109026/are-we-getting-smarter-rising-iqs-james-flynn
books.google.com/books?id=vgHgNsmZ3vsC&pg=PA32&lpg=PA32&dq=black percentage greatest predictor homicide rates&source=bl&ots=PD-0cXWLp9&sig=G8ga6GRVASP3DP81q2nzc3msq04&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjEpKjMlqPQAhXHWSYKHTM9BkEQ6AEIGjAG#v=onepage&q=black percentage greatest predictor homicide rates&f=false
sec-ed.co.uk/news/mixed-race-children-at-greater-risk-of-mental-health-issues/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1448064/?report=classic
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnesota_Transracial_Adoption_Study
www1.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/30years/Rushton-Jensen30years.pdf
benthamopen.com/contents/pdf/TOPSYJ/TOPSYJ-3-9.pdf
www1.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/30years/Rushton-Jensen-reply-to-commentaries-on-30years.pdf
humanbiologicaldiversity.com/articles/Rushton, J. Philippe & Arthur R. Jensen. "The rise and fall of the Flynn Effect as a reason to expect a narrowing of the Black-White IQ gap." Intelligence 38 (2010).pdf
newrepublic.com/article/115787/rising-iq-scores-dont-mean-greater-intelligence
unz.com/article/the-iq-gap-is-no-longer-a-black-and-white-issue/
westhunt.wordpress.com/2015/07/03/inbreeding/
archive.is/TmaDM
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

fuck all the spelling errors

...

...

...

What's the point of this thread? You are just rambling randomly.

thx friendo

...

ay

"old-fashioned" they say.
how fashionable an idea is is irrelevant
how true an idea is is.

...

...

i like biological perspectives to describe immigrants

and jews

good finds

...

...

...

bjp.rcpsych.org/content/201/4/282.abstract?etoc
(2012) Das-Munshi, et. al., conclude that ethnic diversity leads to more psychotic episodes and more social conflict.
pnas.org/content/108/4/1262.abstract
(2010) Douglas Massey concludes that human ethnocentrism is driven biologically and it is a natural, healthy phenomenon. This is indicated by increases in oxytocin when acting ethnocentrically and decreases when acting in a humanitarian manner to other races. He further concludes that oxytocin motivates in-group favoritism and derogation of the out-group.
ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/abs/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300787
(2012) Alvarez and Levy begin their study by stating their assumption that ethnic diversity will lead to gains in health for African and Mexican Americans and conclude their study by showing that it leads to a degradation in general health of African-Americans, an increase in health in White Hispanics, and a decrease in health in non-White Hispanics. The rates of heart disease and cancer are heightened for all races studied in more ethnically diverse communities.
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2012.01138.x/full
(2012) Vogel, Monesson, and Scott conclude that infants develop ethnocentrism naturally as a means to help their survival and nurture their growth. Babies demonstrate this ethnocentrism before exposure to other races.
www-personal.umich.edu/~axe/research/AxHamm_Ethno.pdf
(2003) Axelrod and Hammond conclude that ethnocentrism is natural, universal, and likely acquiesced as an evolutionary safeguard response.
curis.ku.dk/ws/files/130251172/Dinesen_S_nderskov_Ethnic_Diversity_and_Social_Trust_Forthcoming_ASR.pdf
(2015) Dinesen et. al., conclude that being within 80 metres of an individual of another ethnicity or race reduces social trust and creates feelings of unease. This is concluded to be a natural evolutionary response to the out-group.

I got some similar links to scientific studies on IQ but these are related to the topic at hand (Diversity) just reply to me if you want them though.

more links are always good, thank you friend

psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1977-07996-001
(1976) Sandra Scarr and Richard Weinberg conclude that Black children raised in wealthy White homes show better intellectual performance in their youth than Black children raised in Black homes. This supports the idea of youth malleability in the area of intelligence.
The White children in wealthy White homes performed even better in an amount matching the Black-White gap that can be seen in tests of IQ and academic performance outside of this experiment.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6872626
(1983) Sandra Scarr and Richard Weinberg conclude their experiment from the 1970s by testing the children again as adults.
Regardless of youth results, both races regressed to their respective racial means. The White-Black gap still existed and was not reduced.
These findings show that IQ malleability in youth exists, but it levels off as individuals age and subsequently regress to their racial means. These results further prove that there is a genetically heritable component to IQ and that there is an innate difference between different racial groups in this arena
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4286575/
(2015) Shakeshaft et al., analyze 360.000 sibling pairs, 9.000 twin pairs, and 3.000.000 18-year-olds in order to determine the heritability of IQ and its relation to genetic factors.
They conclude that IQ is, "familial, heritable, and caused by the same genetic and environmental factors responsible for the normal distribution of intelligence." They show that high-intelligence is, "a good candidate for, 'positive genetics,'" and conclude that there is a positive end to the distribution of intelligence as it is.
They show that there is no support for the Discontinuity Hypothesis that IQ is the result of environment or that mental illness is the result of something besides genetics.
In total, they conclude that IQ is extremely heritable (85% or more), genetic, polygenic, and does not arise from environmental factors but instead merely interacts with them. They show that people with exceptionally high IQs also tend to have other positive traits and very few negative genetic factors or expressed traits. They conclude IQ has almost no relation to de novo mutations, i.e., new mutations in DNA and that it nearly always matches what is heritable. They show that mental illness does not arise from environmental factors either and must arise from genetic factors and their interaction with the environment. These conclusions lend more credence to both Dual-Inheritance and the Continuity Hypothesis of IQs and Mental Illness.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2668913/
(2009) Rushton & Ankney analyze data from various studies of over 1.000.000 individuals and confirm that there is a positive correlation between brain size and IQ. Larger skulls have larger brains on average and larger brains have higher IQs on average.
They conclude that this phenomenon is likely primarily genetic and as socioeconomic conditions reach a certain level the effects of nutrition on this narrow down and genetic gaps thus become more visible and exposed.
psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/rushtonpdfs/PPPL1.pdf
(2005) Philippe Rushton and Arthur Jensen (author of, "The g Factor") conclude that IQ is the greatest indicator of future success in Western societies when inter-generational income dependence is accounted for.
They also found that IQ is at least 50% heritable and likely nearer to 80% heritable. To draw comparison, height is 70-90% heritable.
During their analysis they concluded that Whites have a minimum of 75% IQ heritability.
nature.com/mp/journal/v16/n10/abs/mp201185a.html
Intelligence is highly heritable and polygenic.
This means that crystallized and fluid forms of intelligence are both genetically transferrable from parent-to-child and have a sort of genetic, "stacking," effect.
The more intelligence alleles an individual possesses the greater expressed effect unlike epistatic genes like those for hair or skin color.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15651931
(2005) Toga & Thompson conclude that genetic influences on brain morphology also contribute significantly to IQ and in their own words, "A measure of cognitive ability, known as g, has been shown highly heritable across many studies. We argue that these genetic links are partly mediated by brain structure that is likewise under strong genetic control. Other factors, such as the environment, obviously play a role, but the predominant determinant appears to be genetic."
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11694885
(2001) Thompson et al., conclude in their own words that, "A genetic continuum was detected in which brain structure was increasingly similar in subjects with increasing genetic affinity. Genetic factors significantly influenced cortical structure in Broca's and Wernicke's language areas, as well as frontal brain regions," and, "Preliminary correlations were performed suggesting that frontal gray matter differences may be linked to Spearman's g, which measures successful test performance across multiple cognitive domains (p < 0.05). These genetic brain maps reveal how genes determine individual differences, and may shed light on the heritability of cognitive and linguistic skills, as well as genetic liability for diseases that affect the human cortex."
This further suggests that brain structure, size, and cognitive performance are all heritable and genetic

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22713927
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3079384/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22963424
(2012) Rushton concludes that there has been no narrowing in the mean Black-White IQ difference predicted by heritable g.
Rushton also invalidates research by Nisbett, Dickens, and Flynn that show black gains in IQ by evaluating their lack of data and use of specious arguments. He shows that the little data they had to prove these points obscured the topic by invoking alleged age and social class interactions and adoption studies of very young children. Their data was based on ideas, not observations. In his own words on the twin studies cited: "There is no evidence of any special cultural influence, such as extreme deprivation or being raised as a visible minority, that operates in one group and not in others."
He shows using a meta-analysis that there has been no reduction in the mean racial differences between Blacks and Whites and that all claims of, "systemic issues," are spurious and unsupported by factual evidence. The credence given to researchers saying that society is to blame for the failures of adopted Blacks comes from a cursory glance at a specious statement - they have no evidence.
psychologicalscience.org/index.php/news/releases/babies-prefer-individuals-who-harm-those-that-arent-like-them.html
(2013) Karen Wynn shows that infants as young as nine months old prefer individuals who are nice to people of their race and dislike people mean to their race. In addition to this they also like people that are mean to others races and dislike people that are nice to other races.
This occurs before full development of metacognition and the effects are apparent even in youths that have developed metacognition but not been in contact with other races substantially.
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289605000917
(2006) Templer & Arikawa analyze populations by temperature, skin color, per capita income, and IQ and find stark correlations between all of them.
They were able to accurately predict individual IQ by skin color (0,92), mean high Winter temperature of their race (0,76), mean low Winter temperature of their race (0,66), and per capita income (0,63). These findings provide strong support for the idea that colder climates caused selection for higher IQs over an evolutionary epoch.
This helps to explain why groups from hotter climates like those found in Africa are less intelligent and thus earn lower incomes.
science.sciencemag.org/content/309/5741/1720
(2005) Mekel-Bobrov et al., conclude that the gene ASPM is a specific regulator of brain size, and its evolution in the lineage leading to Homo sapiens was driven by strong positive selection. They show that one genetic variant of ASPM in humans arose merely about 5.800 years ago in Eurasia and has since swept to high frequency across Eurasia under strong positivel selection.
The gene is almost non-existent in Sub-Saharan Africa.

ucl.ac.uk/tcga/tcgapdf/Thomas-99-intelligence.pdf
(1998) Thomas, Miller & Mascie-Taylor conclude that the EST00083 ("expressed sequence tag") is an mtDNA (mitochondrial; maternal) polymorphism found more often in high IQ groups. It is articularly common in Europe (less so in Asia) where it is associated with a lineage that dates back 35.000 years. It is nearly non-existent in Africa.
This finding goes along with a discovery by Turner & Partington in 1991 that shows mothers are the primary component in a child's intelligence.
jstor.org/stable/2999198?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
(1998) The Journal of Blacks in Higher Education concludes that at all family income levels, there is a persisting racial gap in SAT scores and that the poorest White children outperform the richest Black children. This further suggests that environment is not the explanation for intelligence or the racial testing gap.
These findings are supported by (Binkley & Collin, 2013; North Carolina SAT Report, 2010; Dixon-Roman & Ezekiel et al., 2013; La Griffe du Lion Volume II Number III, 2000; Wightman, 1994; Murray & Herrnstein, 1996; Scarr & Weinberg, 1983; Scarr & Weinberg, 1976; Ciotti, 1998; Arthur Jensen, 1998; Keyes et al., 2009; Miller et al., 2012; Hicks et al., 2004; Iacono et al., 1999; Hur & Bouchard, 1995; Alford, Funk & Hibbing, 2005; Block & Block, 2005; Bouchard et al., 2012; Lykken et al., 1993)
object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/pa-298.pdf
(1998) Paul Ciotti analyzes, "The Kansas City Desegregation Experiment," and shows its results.
For decades critics of the public schools have been
saying, "You can't solve educational problems by throwing money at them." The education establishment and its supporters have replied, "No one's ever tried." In Kansas City they did try. To improve the education of black students and encourage desegregation, a federal judge invited the Kansas City, Missouri, School District to come up with a cost-is-no object educational plan and ordered local and state taxpayers to find the money to pay for it.
Kansas City spent as much as $11,700 per Black pupil–more money per pupil, on a cost of living adjusted basis, than any other of the 280 largest districts in the country. The money bought higher teachers' salaries, 15 new schools, and such amenities as an Olympic-sized swimming pool with an underwater viewing room, television and animation studios, a robotics lab, a 25-acre wildlife sanctuary, a zoo, a model United Nations with simultaneous translation capability, and field trips to Mexico and Senegal. The student-teacher ratio was 12 or 13 to 1, the lowest of any major school district in the country.
The results were dismal. Test scores did not rise; the black-white gap did not diminish; and there was less, not greater, integration.
The Kansas City experiment suggests that, indeed, educational problems can't be solved by throwing money at them, that the structural problems of our current educational system are far more important than a lack of material resources, and that the focus on desegregation diverted attention from the real problem, low achievement.

lesacreduprintemps19.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/factor-analysis-of-population-allele-frequencies-as-a-simple-novel-method-of-detecting-signals-of-recent-polygenic-selection-copy.pdf
(2002) Davide Piffer concludes that the genes rs9320913 (A), rs3783006 (C), rs8049439 (T), rs13188378 (G), rs11584700 (G), rs4851266 (T), rs2054125 (T), rs3227 (C), rs4073894 (A) and rs12640626 are genes associated with intelligence and brain-size.
rs236330 is a gene strongly expressed in neurons, including hippocampal neurons and developing brains, where it regulates neuronal morphology.
rs324650 is a gene involved in neuronal excitability, synaptic plasticity and feedback regulation of acetylcholine release.
East Asian populations (Japanese, Koreans, Bei-Chinese) have the highest average frequency of these alleles (39%) with the slimmest curve of distributions. Europeans have the second-highest amount of these alleles (35,5%) with a right-leaning and wide curve. Sub-Saharan Africans have the lowest frequencies of these alleles (16,4%) with a remarkably slim curve of distributions.
He states that these are not the only genes associated with intelligence but they are some of the known genes for intelligence and brain-size determination. They vary in prevalence across different populations and are evidence of recent polygenic selection.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1893020/
(2007) Witherspoon et. al., conclude that Lewontin's Fallacy that individuals within populations are more genetically unique than between populations is false when more than one genetic variable is used.
They show that Lewontin's Fallacy is based upon cherry-picked selection of specific single nucleotide polymorphisms common to all humans and upon selecting for as few as two single nucleotide polymorphisms the differences become readily apparent and classable. Genetic stratification as a result of this is inevitable without cherry-picking.
When comparing populations at an individual locus they can be shown to be similar and possibly overlapping - when scientists analyze populations over many thousands of loci they never overlap

Humans can be genetically categorized into five racial groups, corresponding to traditional races.
pritchardlab.stanford.edu/publications/pdfs/RosenbergEtAl02.pdf
Genetic analysis "supports the traditional racial groups classification."
psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/rushtonpdfs/PPPL1.pdf
"Human genetic variation is geographically structured" and corresponds with race.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15508000
Race can be determined via genetics with certainty for >99.8% of individuals.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15625622
Oral bacteria can be used to determine race.
medicalxpress.com/news/2013-10-oral-bacteria-fingerprint-mouth.html
Race can be determined via brain scans.
cell.com/current-biology/abstract/S0960-9822(15)00671-5
Common-sense racial categories have biological meaning.
ln.edu.hk/philoso/staff/sesardic/Race2.pdf
Human intelligence up to 75% inheritible
telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/12061787/Intelligence-genes-discovered-by-scientists.html
Human intelligence is highly heritable.
nature.com/mp/journal/v16/n10/abs/mp201185a.html
Achievement Gaps How Black and White Students in Public Schools Perform in Mathematics and Reading on the National Assessment of Educational Progress
nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pdf/studies/2009455.pdf
Academic Performance and Spending over the Past 40 Years
object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/pa746.pdf
The Myth of Racial Disparities in Public School Funding
heritage.org/research/reports/2011/04/the-myth-of-racial-disparities-in-public-school-funding
Black incomes are up, but wealth isn’t
pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2013/08/30/black-incomes-are-up-but-wealth-isnt/
Raw data for correlation between Avg. Homicide rate and GDP per capita:
data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD/countries
unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/IHS-rates-05012009.pdf
Analysis of 45 studies on the relationship between income inequality, poverty, and violent crime:
search.proquest.com/criminaljusticeperiodicals/docview/194775428/fulltextPDF/13F966D028A7BE2828D/2
The positive association between general crime rates and wealth in Black nations:
psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/rushtonpdfs/P&E Crime.pdf
Crime rates and economic conditions in recent US history:
business.pages.tcnj.edu/files/2013/07/Durante-thesis-2012.pdf
huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/14/income-inequality-is-at-an259516.html
nytimes.com/2011/05/24/us/24crime.html
online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052748703580904574638024055735590
businessinsider.com/march-labor-force-participation-rate-2013-4
ou.edu/cls/online/lstd2333/pdfs/unit4incomeinequality

Have saved thread as pdf. Thanks, user.

thx for all links friend

psycnet.apa.org/?&fa=main.doiLanding&doi=10.1037/a0026617
Gijsbert Stoet and David C. Geary reviewed the evidence for the stereotype threat explanation of the achievement gap in mathematics between men and women. They concluded that the relevant stereotype threat research has many methodological problems, such as not having a control group, and that the stereotype threat literature on this topic misrepresents itself as "well established". They concluded that the evidence is in fact very weak.[11]
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608013001556
emilkirkegaard.dk/en/wp-content/uploads/Is-the-Flynn-effect-on-g-A-meta-analysis.pdf
newrepublic.com/article/109026/are-we-getting-smarter-rising-iqs-james-flynn
The flynn effect does not occur on g. blacks are not seeing increases in general intelligence
books.google.com/books?id=vgHgNsmZ3vsC&pg=PA32&lpg=PA32&dq=black percentage greatest predictor homicide rates&source=bl&ots=PD-0cXWLp9&sig=G8ga6GRVASP3DP81q2nzc3msq04&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjEpKjMlqPQAhXHWSYKHTM9BkEQ6AEIGjAG#v=onepage&q=black percentage greatest predictor homicide rates&f=false
black percentage is the greatest predictor of homicide rates after controlling for all socioeconomic factors
sec-ed.co.uk/news/mixed-race-children-at-greater-risk-of-mental-health-issues/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1448064/?report=classic
Health and Behavior Risks of Adolescents with Mixed-Race Identity

...

Minnesota transracial adoption study. Pic related.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnesota_Transracial_Adoption_Study
www1.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/30years/Rushton-Jensen30years.pdf
benthamopen.com/contents/pdf/TOPSYJ/TOPSYJ-3-9.pdf
www1.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/30years/Rushton-Jensen-reply-to-commentaries-on-30years.pdf
humanbiologicaldiversity.com/articles/Rushton, J. Philippe & Arthur R. Jensen. "The rise and fall of the Flynn Effect as a reason to expect a narrowing of the Black-White IQ gap." Intelligence 38 (2010).pdf
Flynn effect does not occur on g
emilkirkegaard.dk/en/wp-content/uploads/Is-the-Flynn-effect-on-g-A-meta-analysis.pdf
There is greater genetic variation within the chimpanzee populations (fst) than betwen chimps and humans.
No biologist would say we are not a different species. Small genetic differences have a HUGE impact.
There is greater variation (fst) within chimpanzees populations than between chimpanzees and humans. does that mean we are the same species? no. small differences in fst can have a massive effect, if we took lewontins fallacy literally there is no difference between chimpanzees and human
newrepublic.com/article/115787/rising-iq-scores-dont-mean-greater-intelligence
Rising black scores due to flynn effect does no t correspond to a greater increase in general intelliegence aka the g factor.
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608013001556
www1.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/30years/Rushton-Jensen-reply-to-commentaries-on-30years.pdf

unz.com/article/the-iq-gap-is-no-longer-a-black-and-white-issue/
Black immigrants to America tend to be extremely educated and wealthy. The are not representative of their average person in their country. Likely the top of the top. Not to mention It has no data on them performing as well as whites is simply states that they perform better than African Americans. They then go on to claim that the amount of them in academia proves that they are doing well as we both know that is not the case.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnesota_Transracial_Adoption_Study
Proven false here in the link above. Every adoption study the adopted blacks scored lower than the biological whites. And again flynn effect is not an increase in general intelligence
www1.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/30years/Rushton-Jensen30years.pdf
Small sample studies of very young children reared in enriched environments
sometimes find an absence of the usual race differences in IQ. In two studies of
2- to 5-year-olds raised in English residential nurseries, Tizard (1974) compared
Black (African and West Indian), White, and mixed-parentage children and found
no significant differences among the three groups on several language comprehension
tests and on the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence
(WPPSI); the single significant difference was in favor of the non-White children.
Moore (1986) found that at age 7, 23 Black children adopted by middle-class
White families had a mean IQ of 117, whereas a similar group of children adopted
by middle-class Black families had a mean IQ of 104, both significantly above the
national Black mean of 85. To be more informative, future studies need to be
supplemented by follow-up testing, as in the Minnesota Study. Behavior genetic
studies consistently show that, as people age, their genes exert ever more influence,
whereas family socialization effects decrease (see Figure 3). Trait differences
not apparent early in life begin to appear at puberty and are completely
apparent by age 17.
Three studies of East Asian children adopted by White families support the
hereditarian hypothesis. In the first, 25 four-year-olds from Vietnam, Korea,
Cambodia, and Thailand, all adopted into White American homes prior to 3 years
RACE DIFFERENCES IN COGNITIVE ABILITY 259
of age, excelled in academic ability with a mean IQ score of 120, compared with
the U.S. norm of 100 (Clark & Hanisee, 1982). Prior to placement, half of the
babies had required hospitalization for malnutrition.
In the second study, Winick, Meyer, and Harris (1975) found 141 Korean
children adopted as infants by American families exceeded the national average
in both IQ and achievement scores when they reached 10 years of age. The
principal interest of the investigators was on the possible effects of severe
malnutrition on later intelligence, and many of these Korean children had been
malnourished in infancy. When tested, those who had been severely malnourished
as infants obtained a mean IQ of 102; a moderately well-nourished group obtained
a mean IQ of 106; and an adequately nourished group obtained a mean IQ of 112.
A study by Frydman and Lynn (1989) examined 19 Korean infants adopted
by families in Belgium. At about 10 years of age, their mean IQ was 119, the
verbal IQ was 111, and the performance IQ was 124. Even correcting the Belgian
norms upward to 109 to account for the increase in IQ scores over time (about 3
IQ points a decade; see Section 13), the Korean children still had a statistically
significant 10-point advantage in mean IQ over indigenous Belgian children.
Neither the social class of the adopting parents nor the number of years the child
spent in the adopted family had any effect on the child’s IQ

Sorry friends if some stuff has been repeated, last few posts were a bit messy I must admit. I hope you enjoy this wealth of information :)

This link is quite popular among a few Holla Forumsacks
westhunt.wordpress.com/2015/07/03/inbreeding/

It has long been known that inbreeding is bad for you. A new paper in Nature (Directional dominance on stature and cognition in diverse human populations) finally gives us a good quantitative estimate of just how bad it is. They find that the offspring of first cousins suffer an average reduction of 1.2 cm in height and 0.3 sd in g ( ~4.5 IQ points) . They directly measured runs of homozygosity – more accurate than estimating from genealogy, and better in other ways as well. Children of first cousin marriages also suffer an elevated incidence of significant genetic disease, roughly 1.5-2 times the non-inbred risk.

That’s not all that far from my previous horseback guess. The field was full of old and messy studies, so horseback guesses were the best you could do, until now.

The article mentions that Darwin recognized negative effects of inbreeding (a bit too late): they also say that he was among the first to do so, which is not true. Al-Jahiz talked about it back in the Abbasid caliphate (around 800 AD) and assumed that everybody knew about it: “as the reader knows, the same is the case with horses, camels, asses and pigeons when they are inbred. ” I suspect that people noticed this soon after farm animals were domesticated, thousands of years ago.

In some parts of the world, mainly the Middle East and North Africa, cousin marriage is very common, with tens of percent of the population practicing it. Repeated marriages among close relatives can sometimes push the homozygosity up considerably higher than the first-cousin level, with even worse results.

Some retards (British papers) have been spinning this as saying that there are big benefits to mixed-race marriage. Untrue: to avoid lots of ROH (runs of homozygosity), just marry someone who isn’t from the same isolated population as you. We’re talking outside the valley or across the river : intercontinental travel is not necessary. Now there might be a degree of hybrid vigor in some distant crosses (currently unclear) – but likely not enough to compensate for someone coming from a group that has low trait values. Marry a Pygmy and your kids are going to be short. Marry someone from a population whose average IQ is below 90 (much of the world) and your kids will on average be less smart

Naturally, enlightened opinion increasingly supports legalization of first-cousin marriage, due to its usual ignorance, perversity, and nihilism.

archived for repository

archive.is/TmaDM

wow the actual number is VERY low compared to what is professed by media and jews.

What else is new about the (((MSM))) ?

bump

thx lad but i was gonna let this thread die to keep the catalog clear for the final 4 days before the dawn
unless you got something to add

Good.

Now take everything you said and replace the word "diversity" with "multi-racial" and the word "culture" with "race".

nation would fit more than race
ex european is a race, english is a nation