What is trumps healthcare reform

We're all in agreement obongocare is out the window

But explain to me what Trump will implement to fix everything?

Other urls found in this thread:

online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203550604574360923109310680.html
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Medical_Association
cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/pa-621.pdf
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Certificate_of_need
freenation.org/a/f1213.html
capitalresearch.org/2012/08/hospital-unionization-harms-the-sick/
archive.mises.org/10217/yet-another-study-finds-patents-do-not-encourage-innovation/
surgerycenterofoklahoma.tumblr.com/post/33608272505/food-and-drug-gangsters
americanthinker.com/2011/06/medicare_reform_its_the_price_fixing_stupid.html
youtube.com/watch?v=3WnS96NV1MI
lewrockwell.com/orig13/smith-gk1.1.1.html
irs.gov/Individuals/The-Health-Coverage-Tax-Credit-(HCTC)-Program
mises.org/daily/6014/
mises.org/library/100-years-us-medical-fascism
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Free health care only for good citizens, law abiding who agree with organ donation when they die.

From the policies he outlined during the election it seemed to go something like this:
free (tax-funded) healthcare for veterans and the elderly, possibly government-subsidized healthcare for the poor.

Everyone else can buy insurance as normal, but nobody would be forced to do so. And he would remove restrictions about buying insurance out-of-state. This would increase the amount of competition, which should drive prices down across the board.

The plan is send the sick people back where they came from.

I do not like the idea of compulsory organ donation, as it encourages doctors not to save all the lives they can.

This will help but it won't be enough. He also needs to stop collusion and enforce price transparency. The insurance companies end charging whatever they fuck they want. And if you add that blatantly fraudulent bullshit to the inability to purchase and resell medication from abroad (which is allowed for every single other product in existence), healthcare costs are going to remain outrageous.

It is cheaper to fly to Japan and stay in a nice hotel to get an MRI than it is to get an MRI here.

Jews.

They also make money from your donated organs. None of that money goes to your relatives, it literally goes into the pockets of jews. Plus your organ probably ends up in a shitskin.

Unlike the various Molyjew Dudeweeds who think the free market is all magical, I fully support the "Socialist" part of National Socialist. I'm for whatever works. Right now, the United States spends more than any other country on health care, but our outcomes are middling – just one tick ahead of Cuba – and we're clearly not getting bang for our bucks.

Part of the problem is fraud and waste. I shudder to think about how many scams are currently going undetected and unpunished in the vast network of overlapping fiefdoms that our system has become.

Another, probably much larger, problem is profiteering. We all know about the squeeze Pharma companies have put on us, as well as the institutionalized monopolies that have created a bizarre hybrid of capitalism and communism that benefits nobody below the major shareholder level.

Personally, I support an NHS-style system, where the money we're currently wasting on making profits for insurance carriers goes instead to compensate providers and directly support expanded care.

I also support gassing Jews and deporting spics, so maybe my ideal system is a little bit utopian.

No niggers, obviously

1. Completely repeal Obamacare. Our elected representatives must eliminate the individual mandate. No person should be required to buy insurance unless he or she wants to.

2. Modify existing law that inhibits the sale of health insurance across state lines. As long as the plan purchased complies with state requirements, any vendor ought to be able to offer insurance in any state. By allowing full competition in this market, insurance costs will go down and consumer satisfaction will go up.

3. Allow individuals to fully deduct health insurance premium payments from their tax returns under the current tax system. Businesses are allowed to take these deductions so why wouldn’t Congress allow individuals the same exemptions? As we allow the free market to provide insurance coverage opportunities to companies and individuals, we must also make sure that no one slips through the cracks simply because they cannot afford insurance. We must review basic options for Medicaid and work with states to ensure that those who want healthcare coverage can have it.

4. Allow individuals to use Health Savings Accounts (HSAs). Contributions into HSAs should be tax-free and should be allowed to accumulate. These accounts would become part of the estate of the individual and could be passed on to heirs without fear of any death penalty. These plans should be particularly attractive to young people who are healthy and can afford high-deductible insurance plans. These funds can be used by any member of a family without penalty. The flexibility and security provided by HSAs will be of great benefit to all who participate.

5. Require price transparency from all healthcare providers, especially doctors and healthcare organizations like clinics and hospitals. Individuals should be able to shop to find the best prices for procedures, exams or any other medical-related procedure.

6. Block-grant Medicaid to the states. Nearly every state already offers benefits beyond what is required in the current Medicaid structure. The state governments know their people best and can manage the administration of Medicaid far better without federal overhead. States will have the incentives to seek out and eliminate fraud, waste and abuse to preserve our precious resources.

7. Remove barriers to entry into free markets for drug providers that offer safe, reliable and cheaper products. Congress will need the courage to step away from the special interests and do what is right for America. Though the pharmaceutical industry is in the private sector, drug companies provide a public service. Allowing consumers access to imported, safe and dependable drugs from overseas will bring more options to consumers.

Enforcing immigration laws, eliminating fraud and waste and energizing our economy will relieve the economic pressures felt by every American. It is the moral responsibility of a nation’s government to do what is best for the people and what is in the interest of securing the future of the nation. Providing healthcare to illegal immigrants costs us some $11 billion annually. If we were to simply enforce the current immigration laws and restrict the unbridled granting of visas to this country, we could relieve healthcare cost pressures on state and local governments. To reduce the number of individuals needing access to programs like Medicaid and Children’s Health Insurance Program we will need to install programs that grow the economy and bring capital and jobs back to America. The best social program has always been a job – and taking care of our economy will go a long way towards reducing our dependence on public health programs. Families, without the ability to get the information needed to help those who are ailing, are too often not given the tools to help their loved ones.

See, that's the wrong line of thought. You don't "fix everything" in one blow, you tackle the parts of the system piecemeal. Prescription drug abuse is rampant? Prevent physicians from receiving remuneration from drug companies and increase scrutiny of health care providers in the most affected regions. Health care isn't affordable? Make it tax-deductible.

There are also by-blows in other areas; for example, (((lobbyists))) being banned would go a long ways towards pulling the teeth of the pharmaceutical industries.

There was a thread a week or two ago about how organ donations often have to be the same race from donor to recipient

I don't know. But IMO the only healthcare the government should pay for is for veterans. If you can't afford healthcare, then tough shit.

Government has no business in (and no legal ability to) regulate healthcare. Government gets out of it entirely.

Healthcare in America is something of a mess. Nowadays, as average citizens find acquiring decent treatment more and more of a struggle, they call upon their politicians to fix the system. The system, some say, is too permissive of the insurance companies, the hospitals, the pharmaceutical companies, etc. They say that there needs to be some sort of demand side counter-balance to the supply side of the medicine economy.
The problem with this political position is that it asks for a government solution to a government-caused problem. It asks that we continue to tinker with the medico-economic machine “Healthcare” and get the knobs and gauges just right. Before we begin to do that, we ought to take a look at where the gauges and knobs are standing right now, how politics has already distorted medicine. There are two categories which we can use to describe the problematic ways the government interferes with medicine today: restrictions and subsidies. What we have today is a virtual ratking of lobby-law, bureaucracy, and demagoguery. The author suggests that before we write yet more legislation on what should go where, we aught to repeal laws which already do so and observe whether medicine becomes more affordably and sensibly distributed.

RESTRICTIONS

Illegality of Cross-State Insurance Purchases
Consumers are prohibited from reaching across state lines to purchase their health insurance. This narrows the selection of insurance plans available to consumers, encourages graft in each state, and makes insurance pricing less competitive.

Licensure of Medicine
Doctors, clinics, hospitals, and insurance providers must become licensed by local, state, or federal government, depending on the scenario, in order to provide care. Doctors are licensed by the American Medical Association (which monopolizes the licensure of all physicians in America) and granted “scope-of-practice” privileges by states. Hospitals and clinics are licensed by municipalities, and insurance providers are licensed by state governments. The essential function of licensure in this case is to exclude would-be providers. Licensure has capital and credential requirements, which then erect barriers to lower-cost solutions. For example, a would-be doctor who may not have attended a prestigious medical academy but could diagnosis common diseases is prohibited from providing care. Hospitals require “certificates-of-need” in order to start construction, which are handed out by municipal or state planning boards. Hospitals can create local monopolies by influencing planning boards not to award “certificates-of-need.” Such restrictionary measures may sound good at first, but become blaring bulls-eyes for medicine monopolists. Thus, there is a restricted supply of medical facilities and professionals.

Health Exchange Boards
In many states, insurance policies are determined in governmental organizations called health exchange boards, wherein state representatives and insurance representatives negotiate a fixed number of policies available to the citizenry. This is supposed to cut down on complications between private industry and medicare/medicaid. What is also means is that a certain number of insurance policies are never made available to the public, and these health exchange boards can also be used to exclude lesser-capitalized insurance groups. These boards limit your coverage options for the sake of bureaucratic convenience and tend to exclude policies which cover less and cost less.

Insurance Alternatives Regulated
At the turn of the century, people belonging to fraternal societies were able to afford basic medical care for the entire year for just a day’s wages. Fraternal societies were created as an alternative to insurance companies, where members could buy into the communal pool and then collectively hire a doctor to work on wages. Elitist doctors were humiliated by this ‘lodge-practice’ and demanded the AMA be created, which then only granted licenses to those who did not do ‘lodge-practice.’ Mutual aid societies withered away in response to both the licensure and the capital and reserve requirements which were imposed on all ‘insurance companies,’ which were too burdensome for the comparatively small mutual aid societies to comply with. Competition in insurance stagnated as alternatives were prohibited.

Unionism in Medicine
Medicine is a unionized industry. Nurses and other random hospital personnel, through their unions, demand that certain processes be made impossible unless under the supervision of a unionized worker. This means that jobs which require only the labor of one person become jobs that require the labor of six people. The hospital, and ultimately the taxpayer, then has to pay for said extra labor. This also raises the barrier to entry for possible competing clinics, if they can’t provide certain services without hiring unnecessary workers.

Patents
Patenting is when a government gives an inventor a monopoly over an idea. Said inventor may then punish others should they try to use the same idea, using only their own private property. This limits the amount of providers-per-innovative-idea to one. Some might say that patents are a necessary carrot to the proverbial horse for spurring innovation. Patent lawyer Stefan Kinsella disagrees, saying that empirical evidence suggests that patenting actually has a depressing effect on innovation. Patenting in the medical industry leads to needlessly expensive medical goods, namely machinery and pharmaceuticals.

Food and Drug Administration
The FDA is an organization which screens products for safety and quality before giving them the green light for sale and consumption. It has also been captured by agribusiness corporations since its very inception. It slows the release of new medicines, prohibits people from trying alternatives, and occasionally seizes property and privilege only to confer it to a state-blessed enterprise. This discretionary authority, especially when seized by monopolistic interest, leads to slowed innovation, fewer products available, and product markups as large as 37 times.

Medicare/Medicaid Price Fixing
The Medicaid and Medicare programs set the minimum reimbursement rates, which companies then use as a baseline. This system encourages you to go onto an insurance plan. Physicians offer lower prices to clients with insurance to try to attract business and then charge higher prices to make up for said insurance discount. This means then, that those without insurance and can probably least afford care, end up paying the most for it. Without price-fixing for procedures and treatments, there would be no general minimum charge and physicians wouldn’t have to discount insurance companies to attract clients.

Paperwork
Paperwork in general is a restriction on business. It raises the costs of a business, as entrepreneurs are forced to comply with regulations, as well as employ lawyers and pencil pushers to sort through red tape. This disadvantages small businesses as they aren’t politically connected enough to avoid regulation and also are more sensitive to high costs of businesses than are large businesses. Paperwork slants markets in favor of well-established businesses.

SUBSIDIES

Institutional Tilt Towards Insurance
When everyone is encouraged to go on health insurance, everything is encouraged, and even employers are encouraged to provide health insurance, the consumer’s function as a discriminator and cost-cutter is qualitatively altered. Instead of economizing and considering every purchase of medicine, the care-seeker will simply ask for help and sign the bill. Care-givers, acknowledging this, will sell high-cost options primarily and not suffer for it, seeing as the care-seeker’s treatment is being covered by his insurance company. What happens over time when consumers do not seek the best bang for their buck is that both treatments and insurance rates will go up.

Mandatory Coverage of Specific Conditions
Insurance companies are compelled by law to offer coverage to certain treatments in all of their policies. This benefits the person with said medical condition to the disadvantage of all without said medical condition. All are forced to pay for the now higher rate, due to the increment of risk added by mandatory extra coverage, whether they want to be covered for said condition or not. If a person A has a certain condition, it is not the responsibility of the next person to subsidize the treatment of person A. Insurance plans become homogenized and unnecessarily expensive. This encourages people not to avoid certain conditions, such as obesity or heart disease.

Aid to Hospitals (Equipment)
Hospitals receive aid for having the West and greatest hi-tech equipment. This encourages hospitals to spend too much money on expensive equipment, party paid for by taxpayers. And since the hospitals aren’t buying the equipment because of a legitimate need but because of a political incentive, they are not discriminating buyers. Thus, we can expect that suppliers of expensive medical equipment will raise prices comfortably without fearing that hospitals will stop buying.

Aid to Hospitals (Patients)
The government will pay for a share of a patient’s hospital bill Wit is sufficiently huge. Since hospitals are non-competitive they will respond by ratcheting up the hospital bill to get federal money. Citizens, in the aggregate of their tax forms and ER bills, end up paying twice as much.

Aid to Employers
The federal tax code encourages employers to provide their employees with health insurance. Some might say this is great, but it is not. Employers offer that health insurance out of your wages. Though the wage compensation you would get if employers were not encouraged to off you health insurance would probably not, at this moment, be as big as the total value of the health insurance he does provide you, at this moment, it causes some big problems. Firstly, it programs you to clutch your job like a life-line, whereas if you acquired insurance independently, you could go where you liked. If you value independence and self-respect, that’s problematic. This also disables the consumer choice mechanism: no one will leave their job just to get a different healthcare plan. Secondly, it puts everyone on bloated insurance plans, which leads to the problems described above (insurance for things you don’t need to be insured for, can pay for yourself, don’t need to pay for, etc.)

Inflation
Since much of the deficit is financed out of Open Market Operations and Medicaid and Medicare are about half of the deficit, a sizable chunk of all printed money goes into government spending in healthcare. This means that the government’s buying activity in healthcare drives the prices up and those not on the government healthcare teat will have to pay higher prices; not having had the privilege of paying yesterday’s low prices with tomorrow’s new money, they will have the pain of paying tomorrow’s high prices with yesterday’s old money. As the deficit gets worse, more debt will have to be monetized, and there will be more inflation in healthcare. Meaning, healthcare isn’t getting any cheaper.

America does have a healthcare problem. It’s a problem of graft, lopsidedness, short-sightedness, bureaucracy, lobbyism, and pharmaceutical and insurance company influence. It’s a problem that competitive enterprise and free association could fix easily, but they are prohibited. Before you seek to bring down the hammer of legislation on America’s demented healthcare industry’s head, try releasing it from bondage. Try letting people form their own organizations, innovate independently, provide their own services and products, live outside of the influence of insurance companies and governments, and make their own decisions. If the price of healthcare doesn’t come down after that, then start talking about legislation.

Sources
1. online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203550604574360923109310680.html
2. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Medical_Association
3. cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/pa-621.pdf
4. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Certificate_of_need
5. freenation.org/a/f1213.html
6. capitalresearch.org/2012/08/hospital-unionization-harms-the-sick/
7. archive.mises.org/10217/yet-another-study-finds-patents-do-not-encourage-innovation/
8. surgerycenterofoklahoma.tumblr.com/post/33608272505/food-and-drug-gangsters
9. americanthinker.com/2011/06/medicare_reform_its_the_price_fixing_stupid.html
10. youtube.com/watch?v=3WnS96NV1MI
11. lewrockwell.com/orig13/smith-gk1.1.1.html
12. irs.gov/Individuals/The-Health-Coverage-Tax-Credit-(HCTC)-Program
13. mises.org/daily/6014/

These are the main two issues. People wouldn't need insurance if it didn't cost $100 per minute to breathe the air in a doctor's office.
How exactly does this work? From what I understand it's similar to Obamacare, and creates a massive drain like how all these systems do because "I dun gotta stay healthy bruv, me NHS is gonna pay for it m8"

It's simple. You remove the arbitrary state borders on health insurance. Someone comes in and undercuts every over provider in the country with lower rates and better service, and all the others are forced to lower their rates too.

Simple free market.

You could have taken a look at his campaign website 4 months ago if you wanted the answer to your question you fucking retarded mong

Cuba has great healthcare for an economy that size. Rounding up people with AIDS and sending them to a gulag helps I guess. You are worse than most of Europe and parts of Asia is the real comparison.

Wew, save some dubs for the rest of us.

Cut regulations, especially on training for doctors and other medical practitioners. No reason to go to a fucking MD to get a bone set, or to get stitches, or even to get some antibiotics.

But more likely just a shift to medical savings accounts, with poor people having money deposited for them so they can have money to meet their deductibles. If they allow excess cash to be drained, that will create an incentive to refrain from overspending on health care.

Back when we had a free market in health care, even the poorest families could afford housecalls from doctors.

How much do you think a housecall would cost today? $5000? $10000? You think you could even get one?

mises.org/library/100-years-us-medical-fascism

Tape it up. We got shit to take care of.

Paul Ryan's plan(**Trump has no plans and will let Ryan and Pence do whatever the fuck they want) is "healthcare savings accounts" which is great if you actually have money to save