CNN/CIA accuses Julian Assange of being a pedophile in responce to the Hannity interview where Obama/CNN's narrative of...

CNN/CIA accuses Julian Assange of being a pedophile in responce to the Hannity interview where Obama/CNN's narrative of Russian hacking gets BTFO'd. Wikileaks has now threatened to sue CNN unless they air an hour of truth.

twitter.com/WLTaskForce/status/816645680517312512

youtube.com/watch?v=Vg9gmIqiX64

Get ready fam, it's about to get VERY comfy in the next 48 hours!

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=Dg6gu3qY7rA
mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/national/article124566504.html
theintercept.com/2017/01/04/washpost-is-richly-rewarded-for-false-news-about-russia-threat-while-public-is-deceived/
twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/255294883680632833
archive.is/T8lUk
8ch.net/whore.txt
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Interview that started the fire:

youtube.com/watch?v=Dg6gu3qY7rA

...

Wew laddy

WE love Assange.

Video

No way in hell will CNN show that video. Still hoping to hear about what President Trump has in mind for the anti-defamation laws he mentioned.

Julian just released a video

No doubt Julian knows this and is just stoking the fire and rubbing CNN's nose in it before the lawsuit (or better yet, damning leaks of their corruption).

They fucked with the wrong Straya

I mena for fuck's sakes, he's trying to get CNN to tell the truth for a whole hour.

I'm laffin so hard right now

...

CNN just took down their tweet of the segment where Assange is called a Pedophile

I think having his internet cut was good for him.

Fucking guy's come back with a fucking vengeance. He's fucking killing it at the moment.

WEW

Fucking sickening. Julian Assange used to put pedoshits in prison. Way back in the '90s, before he got big, he worked with Australian police to trace CP images back to the source. He played an anonymous (by his own request) role in smashing a global hurtcore ring in 1994.

Now he's supposed to be a pedo. Thanks, CIA. That one is going into the pile with literally every other thing you've ever said about anyone ever.

CIA screams "PEDO!" all the time because they're the biggest pedophile organization on Earth.

Mudd is a projecting diddler

Look at the guy who published stuff exposing our secrets he is a rapist!

Inb4 Catholic Church joke.

But yes, this is really pathetic. It's as if these globalist cocksuckers have had things their own way for so damn long, they have no idea what to do when real predators enter their environment. Slander just doesn't cut it anymore.

this has to be the first time I've seen inb4 used correctly since the old halfchan Holla Forums days of the mid 2000's
thank you

The CIA is the most hated and despicable agency in the US. They have never done anything respectable, honest, nor in the interests of the people of United States.

If you remember some months ago, Hillary actually tried using a shadow organization with CIA links to frame Assange into being a pedo and got BTFO by Holla Forumsack detective work.

mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/national/article124566504.html

They're not even creative about it. All they do is accuse others of what they do; hacking, election fraud, child fucking

I am sure this is connected to toddandclaire.com

Requesting toddandclaire dump.

The Jew screams in pain as he strikes you. So does the spook.

Of course the spooks would know about toddandclaire, they help set it up.
Most likely to use the pedo accusation to get Ecuador to throw Assange out of the embassy or at least for everyone to ignore the leaks surfacing.

Also would like this.

toddandclaire2 electric bugaloo

That's exceptionally well done. Stealing

...

RT just now

This is precisely what I'd like to see more of on Holla Forums. This takes a huge and complex chain of insane and unbelievable events, boils it down into a normie-friendly package you don't have to be autistic to understand, and makes it shareable for us all. Very well done. Enjoy this Pepe. It isn't terribly rare, but my collection is limited.

well if someone knows about pedophilia its the rats nest in (((washington)))

This makes me so fucking angry. And they have the AUDACITY to claim that we are immoral when they perform and advocate shit like this.

"Accuse them of what you do, call them what you are."

Holy fuck the sophistry is off the charts, no wonder Trump is gutting the CIA

Didn't we fuck up the plot to frame Assange as a Pedophile?

Is CNN going to die because of us?

...

Genius. Either they do what he wants and shows the video, or they get sued, the suit gets covered, and everyone sees that tweet anyway.

user cmon, you're just being redundant.

Honestly Todd and Claire was one of our finest hours.

We goddamn beat the CIA.

Story ? It sounds familiar but I never really heard of it before.

Accuse the enemy of doing exactly what you do. Oldest Jewish tactic.

Here's a nice recap:

Someone post the video speculating that Assange was digitally rendered

Yep, it was Seth Rich and he was killed for it

CIA Niggers tried to frame Assange as a pedophile. We cracked it wide open and even had anons on the ground scoping out their blacksites in Texas.

Our investigation gives Assange the weight to threaten CNN.

Noice.

...

Whatever. Even my broke-ass is going to give wikileaks a tip after this

Unless those faggots pull it off with the norms, that is. They'd better knock this shit off.

Do not give them free legal advice.

Of course they'd call him a pedophile. After all, he may have downloaded attachments in hillary's emails.

And this was after someone was seen scaling the side of the Ecuadorian embassy in London. Julian must have nine lives or some shit.

He just knows better than to take the bait

Holy shit I'm actually pissed. How much do you want to bet that if you dug into this Mudd guy you'd find some dirty shit?

(checked)

Seems too appropriate

Tear them apart, Julian.

Wa-comPost BTFO

This is really good:

theintercept.com/2017/01/04/washpost-is-richly-rewarded-for-false-news-about-russia-threat-while-public-is-deceived/

WaPo called out for profiting over fake news and basically being propagandists

...

wew

Assange is basically a mild lolberg right?

Do you think he is going through the same lolberg transformation into a disciplined nazi that Molymeme, Ben Garrison et al are going through/went through?

Who is that?

Just some femanon.

strewth yarn ya bloody drango

Source? If true I will feel bad for ever doubting him.

Molyjew and Ben Garrison are not even close to being 'disciplined nazis'.

I feel dumb for not even knowing about this, despite being on Holla Forums 24/7 at the time. I kinda want to know more about it now, especially the ground operations. Probably shouldn't have spent so much time memeing.

shit, is this real? it'd be too good to be true if we elected someone who's actually gonna give kidfuckers what they deserve

Based as fuck.

Did Trump know, or suspect, about pizzagate long before it broke? Has he been biding his time and waiting until he is in a position to see all the kiddie fuckers put away for life?

WHAT WAS THE PLOT?

Every libertarian that is actually informed about the state of the world turns into a nationalist.

Progression is something like this:
1. Full SJW.
2. Progressive without idpol.
3. Liberal with some traditions.
4. Classical liberal.
5. Libertarian.
6. Nationalist libertarian.
7. Nationalist.
8. 14/88

There are a few steps where this train can be derailed, but it's usually pretty consistent. That's why I don't insult libertarians as much anymore.

The lolbert and ancap memes are still pretty funny.

Ancaps are actually one of the derails.

If a libertarian doesn't have enough info about the world around him, he eventually turns ancap instead of nationalist.

An ancap eventually turns into an anarchist, then anarchist socialist, then eventually full on commie.

I'm speaking partly from experience here.

Im actually an ancap and I think they are funny

When taken to absurdity (or logical conclusion if you prefer) anything can be funny.

I started at 5. Libertarianism would work, but really only with white people; not with Jews (or anyone else) actively trying to destroy your nation. And since I'm a pragmatist and not a deluded commie, I'm forced to consider things as they are now and accept that Nationalism is the only workable solution.
For Libertarians, I think Jews are the ultimate redpill. Libertarianism assumes that everyone is working in their own best interests (within the limits of the law), and that overall this will result in the greatest good for the greatest number of people. It doesn't really consider that there might be people in your country who consider their interests to be the destruction of your country.

...

Relationships with 4chan girls are always crazy. Both in a good and bad sort of way.

They get your humor and you're on the same sort of wavelength in a way you aren't with normie girls, but they're also often histrionic, suffer from some sort of cripplingly low self-esteem, have family issues, are depressives who have panic attacks etc.

They're good girls if you take care of them though. Just be prepared to deal with a girl who has camwhored in the past.

Lauren?

Is it weird that this time I saw it as a penguin? (Same eyes; white froth is its neck and chest; dark froth is its beak)

To be fair anons suffer from a lot of those problems as well.

Yeah it happens. For some reason I tend to skip over the stickied threads in catalogue view.

Ben Garrison isn't, but you're wrong about Stefan "I no longer believe in ethnic egalitarianism" Molyneux.

...

and most of them have a penis

...

Well yeah, that's why - provided you at least have some impetus to sort yourself out - femanons make good gf material.

Stay away from cosplayers though.


It always struck me as wishful thinking on the part of people who posted this sort of thing.

Like whenever you used to post a pic of a cute girl on Holla Forums, theres' always a gaggle of faggots who would call her a trap.

Wishful thinking.

Oh shit do we get to see footage from Rapelay now?

I think that femanons can be good gf's because they're willing to be anons, they're not obsessed with attention whoring and are willing to keep their ego's in check. They also could have interesting things to say because they post in an environment where they don't have their girl pass.

Of course cosplayers are massive attention whores.

Get out

Calm your autism. I promise you cannot get cooties over the internet.

I'd upload Eatshit.webm if I had it

"There are no girls on the Internet"

HEEEEY GUYS FEMANON HERE, WE'RE NOT LIKE THOSE OTHER GIRLS :3

I don't think you actually know what you're talking about.

These girls are damaged. Full stop. No normal girl would come here.

Keked, (((Glenn Greenwald))) is such a degenerate. I can't believe they accuse him of being one of us.

Those highlights are triggering my OCD.

Clear selection bias. The ones who never do that don't influence your perception of "femanons" because you never become aware of them.

Yet you somehow are.

because they don't exist

that's disgusting, why would gays want to racemix? they're already pissing off their parents by gay and (probably) doing meth


that's kind of confirmation bias, the only femanons you notice are the atention whoring ones

This is undoubtedly true though. Do any of you really want the mother of your children to be desensitized to mexican cartel gore? Any woman who comes here is certainly damaged, even if she keeps her mouth shut about being a woman.

For 'femanons', their beta white knights and MGTOWS ITT

kek why do buttblasted betas always post this

Because there's no limit to their degeneracy.

How do you ever meet them if they're not allowed to admit they are female?

I mean I met the girls I dated on 4chan through Holla Forums and /r9k/ primarily, in threads where I realized someone I was talking to who sounded interesting was actually a girl, so I thought fuck it and decided to ask for an email.


They're damaged but not in a "I want to date black guys" way, it's more of a "I have HPD, panic attacks, cry all the time and behave like Emily Youcis in public" way.

I wouldn't have it any other way. They're fucking top-tier girls if you're a middling white collar user, and I've been too broken by internet disease to click with normie girls at this point (tried it before, relationship with a giant sham).

Just be prepared for:

- Panic attacks (as mentioned).
- Emotions all over the place.
- Paranoia on her part.
- Lewd, porn-derived sex.

Not going go work, sorry faggot.

There are no nigtows on Holla Forums, we bullycided them all.

Sure are a lot of pointless derails today.

We're talking about femanons who you don't notice because they stay anonymous you retard. Yes of course we hate attention whores.

...

Rule 30 faggot

The rule maintains discussion quality. It's a natural extension of anonymity itself. Anonymity facilitates accurate analysis by attacking and neutralizing ego. Ego is the enemy, and boasting about having a vagina is a manifestation of ego.

I want you to have someone better.

There were those sexbot, waifu, m-preg and cloning threads month ago, so I really doubt that.

I'd argue that if an user reveals themselves to be a femanon then they're not actually femanon's.

Exactly. That's why they're told to GTFO.

We're all damaged.

We are literally all victims of a depraved, shitty age in which internet time sinkery has become the norm, and into which we've attached our sublimated racial identity - having been denied a real one (with its constituent offshoots like healthy communities) in the real world.

The last real community IRL I remember being a part of was growing up with my friends as a kid who lived down my road. Having super soaker fights etc.

My "professional community" is just a bunch of strivers, my neighborhood doesn't know each other at all and only interacts out of politeness and so on. Even when I try to get involved in IRL communities (I'm into mountain hiking and astronomy), I'll make one or two friendships over the course of years, it's an atomization thing - I don't actually have a large community to be a part of and I'm guessing the irreligious among you are the same. I'd rather date a girl who understands that feeling of alienation of being a white person in 2017 in a multiracial cesspit than a normie girl who isn't "damaged". Plus femanons are cute af and let you choke them and slap them around in bed.

Even the more comparatively "normal" elements of the alt right, like the guys over at MPC, understand this on some level. It's why they have broken fucks like Mlad and weirdo girls like Gwerks posting there.

So what i'm saying is that if you want a good femanon gf you'll have to concoct clever ways of finding her. Femanons that reveal themselves are mentally ill attention whores who are not functionally different from normalfags.

Did you take that embed video so personally? I link it and dedicated to specific groups of people, that's all.

I miss U Hitler

All of these (((subcultures))) that have arisen, primarily in music, over the past 50 or so years are basically just sublimated racial identity.

Online-only activism can be cringe worthy, but at least we're promoting something which, at the least, is marginally better for kids and encourages them to take pride in who they are and who their ancestors were.

Not then. Not now. Not ever. Take your Marxist thinking elsewhere, Chaim.

It's an alternative at least. Better than nothing I suppose.

Nice try nigtow.

...

hownew.ru

Cute but deceptive.

Better safe than sorry. Women that spend too much time on imageboards are not trustworthy.

While I don't like to admit this - I think he there may be a chance he is.

I'm starting to think there is a deeper internet community of pedos just trying to destroy the CIA.

Stop baiting.

I think the ones who are very vocal about how they're full 14/88 tend to be a bit off, but your average femanon who just mildly dislikes being around niggers out of some gut feeling but doesn't really have a systematized right-wing worldview is fine.

Women can be tapped in the head user.

...

And you typically won't find them on imageboards. Maybe reddit.

They tend to not take the Internet too seriously and tend to skirt around the edges of the meme-field.

If only. Before Wikileaks exposed the collusion that exists or Trump publicly called them liars while his supporters mocked them in their press pits nobody trusted them. Nobody. CNN is sold to rural boomers with cable “news” packages when all they really want is Fox. It's the background noise for waiting rooms and suburban soccer moms zombiefied on a diet of Zoloft & Xanax that are more concerned with Timmy's iPad being fully charged before he gets off bus so he leaves her the fuck alone until daddy brings home tonight's dinner from Panera Bread rather than our current president acting like a narcissistic faggot by needlessly provoking a nation with a nuclear arsenal. It's what libshitters are now pretending is a creditable source of information so they can “win” arguments on social media despite that just a few years ago they considered them a lesser evil than FoxNews bullshit artist and wet their pants over the announcement of Al Jazeera America because “like it's going to be a totally unbiased source of news from a non-american perspective, man!” Which is even more hilarious considering they're the ones who watch pundits pretending to be comedians and that monotone jew from democracy now.


If Assange does win it's not going to mean much. In the grand scheme of things CNN is basically a masquerade ball and the only ones in attendance are the orchestra and the mask merchants. We'll see some very delicious salt for a few weeks and if luck is on our side corporate will trim some fat and faggots like that bug-eyed cocksucker Cuomo will be heading to the unemployment line. If anything will only serve to expedite the inevitable conclusion where they finally drop all pretentiousness and model themselves after HLN with two minute bombardments of irrelevant talking heads screaming inconsequential bullshit at one another before cutting to ten minutes of commercials about hygiene products and medication or just go full TMZ.

Stop projecting dude.

Why are imageboards so full of men who desperately want everyone else to like "traps" as much as they do?

Fuck traps all you want, but leave us out of you fucking degenerate literal faggot.

Not projecting, pic in looks like a little boy, not a girl

Honestly, to me it looks like a girl with short hair.

The facial morphology is just fundamentally different to all but the lowest of t men.

Men being "damaged" isn't a problem. Men are evolutionary built to hack other men to bits, to bash their skulls open with rocks. Men being desensitized is not a problem. Women were never meant for any of that. Mothers should not be desensitized like that.


Sam Hyde slayed that arrested development wonky-legged pussy, or so I've heard.

When did spellcheck become such worthless shit?

He fucked Marky (some other tripfag) too.

That's kind of why I sympathize tons with Sam, I get the feeling he's addicted to those sorts of girls in the same way I am.

And Jesus, they really are addictive.

Why do you say she's arrested development though? Weeb obsessions?


Fair enough. I can accept this.

Thank you fucking kikes, can't even enjoy short haired high energy girls anymore, without double questioning if it's a fucking trap.

...

Because she seems to emotionally be a child, from what I've seen. She was probably abused as a child and got stuck like that. Her voice and mannerisms are the tell.
>t. listened to a lot of Loveline when I was a teenager


I know your pain. 90% of them are lesbians these days too, it's just not worth it. Learn to appreciate long-haired traditional girls. That's what I did.

>twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/255294883680632833
See for yourself.

wew laddy. It's really happening, isn't it?

Seriously, how hard is it to spellcheck your tweets Trump?

He's a busy man, a pretty old man too, tapping away on his phone most of the time.

Course he doesn't give a shit.

Yes 100%! I would rather want her to smile fondly at the sight of pictures of spikes, dindus, kebabs having been killed by snipers or after having been crushed by tank threads.

There is a war going on, has been for many years, you gotta be desensitized if you want to do something about it.

That they are women does not exclude them from that.
It is a good thing if they go to Holla Forums rather than tumblr and a good thing if they like MoonMan videos cuz of what MoonMan sings about doing and wants 6 millions for real.

We are all damaged to one extent or another by living our whole lives in this sick society, the answer is that we must be willing to repair ourselves and repair ourselves to fight the war for White survival.

Those who want to live, let them fight, and those who do not want to fight in this world of eternal strugge will not live for much longer, aren´t owned shit.

Let duty guide them and let duty guide you, Kek bless!

On another note, anyone else actually really soft-hearted when it comes to women?

The only thing I'll draw a get-the-gas red line at is race-mixing, but otherwise I'm a sucker for a girl with a bad childhood, I can't help it. I find everything about women, in the traditional sense (overly empathetic, loving animals, love of prettified arts and crafts etc) so goddamn perfect.

How anyone can hate women is beyond me.

...

Women are our most valuable resource.

Nah, we are still being spammed with their faggotry and butthurt, we really must petition the God-Emperor to defund CTR.

I agree that bullycide is the right course of action, it just needs more work. Don´t forget, Sage and Report all wizard threads.

Women don't belong on the front lines. Women exposed to the true horrors of war get fucked up in a way that fucks up their children and in turn fucks up society. Just look at Germany, Russia, etc, where war was brought to the civilian population and the women exposed to it. Look at their old women who were young during those wars, they are all seriously fucked up in the head. Cold and broken.

And most easily exploited.

I agree with this, but…
Try to break yourself of this habit. Find a woman who had a good childhood. A woman who has parents who are still happily married, and who has a good relationship with her father. Trust me, you'll make life much easier for yourself if you do.

Learn to archive:
archive.is/T8lUk

Way ahead of you bro.


Yeah, but this isn't a literal war - yet anyway.

These posts got me thinking about Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad. Have any of you guys read that? In it, the main character, Marlow, has a similarly protective attitude towards women that has always been sympathetic to me. He says:


That to me is the correct attitude to take towards women's admittedly dysfunctional role in today's politics/society.

This too:

Yeah, the girl I'm with now actually had a good childhood - although her mother died young. Her dad's a cool guy who brought her up well.

They don't normally exemplify the other traditional traits you mentioned, but as mentioned, avoid at all costs.

They have no memetic defenses of their own. It is the responsibility of men to protect them. Always has been, it's the simple nature of our biology. The 19th amendment was a mistake because it went against this biological reality. But the biological reality still stands.

Excellent book! I read that last year when somebody on Holla Forums suggested it.

...

Men have always been better single parents then women.

Sounds interesting. Do you mean counter-meming or just critical thinking to discern faulty memes.

This. I've dated changirls in the past, it was always crazy. Not really worth it IMO. Especially since pretty much all of them are camwhores and who wants to date a whore? And the camwhoring is probably the only thing they'll admit to, taking their shirt off and shit, but they've probably done the whole sharpie in pooper thing and other memed degeneracy. I knew one that used to puke on her tits on camera.

Got a screen name?

Women aren't sapient, they can't reason (note that logic and reason are separate faculties). They can't divorce the content of their thoughts from their emotions.

Part of that might be economic, men who are willing to stick around tend to be richer, and tend to be of higher moral character.

Men are overwhelmingly more likely to abandon their children though. Non-broken women find this literally impossible.

amazing

Well rerail it then. In light of the Senate hearing today, Clapper tried to denigrate Assange and said he wasn't credible, which doesn't make sense, as they're accusing him of leaking real information.

The camwhoring is a product of abyssal-tier self-esteem. Female anons and male anons basically suffer from the same pathologies: No confidence, no self-esteem, oftentimes evolving into outright self-hatred, which manifests in self-harm and risky behavior.

The problem with females on imageboards is that they have a low-risk, (seemingly) high-reward way of actually building up some sense of self-esteem again: camwhoring.

I don't think it necessarily correlates with actual promiscuity though. It's just deeply unhappy, atomized girls of all stripes desperately wanting to be told they're beautiful and pretty and desired.

Women just need to be married off younger and have babies in their bellies in their early 20s ideally or late teens if they're lower-IQ/low impulse control.

Women are so much happier when they're pregnant, it's insane.

Something about personal bullets, it's been a while.


This. They all had shitty self-esteem and all but one cut themselves regularly.

This subhuman has been shitting up the board with gender tripe since election week. Mods are obviously ok with this, since the whole catalogue is full uf MGTOW vs white knight d&c bullshit.

Are any of the MSM, besides FOX, actually questioning the official narrative in any meaningful way?

Yeah, childhood abuse is also common among a lot of them unfortunately. I actually think the low self-esteem is related to broader factors than them personally being broken. I think it relates to things like whites not having a real group they feel they belong to and so on.

Remember that sexual bolshevist propaganda about how it's cool to be an escort, or have meaningless sex or whatever almost always singles out white women as the target audience.


NIGTOW, not MGTOW.

Is this just a white girl thing? I don't think I've seen Blacks or Asians doing this sort of shit.

See:

These are pathologies unique to a lot of young white girls/guys today. They relate to things like constant media denigration by you know who, demoralization propaganda and a general lack of group identity.

Look at Muslims, the media actively says it's ok for Muslims to wear hijab and behave in a modest, decent way - but white girls who attempt modesty are portrayed as retrograde, primitive, un-cool etc.

confirming minus the camwhoring

Dunno, only ever dated white ones. Panic attacks were really common for them, too.

No, and they'll ignore Clapper being forced to destroy the narrative by Senator Cotton.

...

Yeah, how it should be. Not how things actually are right now and will be in the near future, now is it? It is just going to get worst too.

Overly sensitive, spoiled and sheltered people, both men and women, are the ones who have helped bring about that situation.

Looks to me they fucked up their children just fine without these horrors, women in the post-war USA sure fucked up raising their children more than in post-war Germany or the Soviet-Union.

I prefer that women to know what is coming and be as ready as possible to face it when it comes.

To know the danger of economic collapse, grooming gangs and of race-mixing propaganda.
I rather they be damaged by that knowledge than damaged by the results of not knowing because wizards believes that would make them good wives.

Holy shit.

I know we've said it a thousand times before, but there's no way even the dumbest normie can't see how indicative of a controlled media this all is.

This goes beyond just the general social liberal bias we've come to expect from journo grads, or even the systematic cover ups of "potentially inciteful" stories about non-white on white crime.

This is full on narrative control from the very top.


Surprised so many 8/polacks have dated female anons.

nope, I'm a white guy and I've dealt with self harm issues. So does my sister, except she's full on highlighter hair sjw tier so it's not surprising for her to do it. Plus she cuts on her arms where people can see, and I cut on my thighs so I can hide it. That me and my sister both are psychologically fucked kind of opened my eyes to how shitty a family operating under (((liberal))) principles is for healthy development.

It's really hard to stop self harming though, it feels so good and it's such an easy thing to do.


this makes me feel marginally better about all of those kikes he's appointed. maybe he has a plan


Anyway, any chance that CNN gets cleared from charges because of muh free speech?

Have you made any attempt at getting her back on track?

Does it get annoying after a while?

I want to suggest assisted suicide for you and your sister.
Get your shit together nigger, you're better than this.

yeah, it's like talking to a brick wall. Even on the simplest of things, gun control, it's impossible to make any headway.

it's like that with any subject. Sometimes she'll concede minor points, but it's ultimately futile, at least while she's still in art school.

I did have fun by getting her to explain white privilege (whites have an edge over everyone else in every country regardless of whether or not they are the minority or the majority, and it's there since birth and you can't get rid of it) and then called her a white supremacist because she was just saying that whites are inherintley better than everybody else. she got pretty flustered at that

(heil)
as someone who gets panic attacks it get's annoying after a while, and I'm sure it gets annoying to the people who have to deal with someone who's having a panic attack

and I'm getting my shit together, I go to therapy a couple times a week and I'm busting my ass to heal the psychological scars from fucked up childhood stuff.

(checked)
Yeah they were super fucking annoying. On the bright side, I got good at handling them and today I'm still good at calming down anyone who's freaking out. After a while though, I just started leaving or hanging up on girls when they started having panic attacks. Just got sick of it, especially when there was some other camwhore I could get a hold of.

Hail Victory Brother!

That's not the best line of argument you should employ brother.

Is she a weeb? I'm guessing she is.

Ask her why she venerates the culture of a country whose policies on immigration, naturalization and criminal justice make Trump look like a leftist. Simply get a map down off the wall, pick any "non-white" or "non-western" country and explain how their norms, political, social, cultural what have you, are hardcore right-wing by western standards and will never change.

Ask her why whites are seemingly the only group interested in pursuing liberalism as public policy.

Memes that function like ideological immune systems. Memes that enable somebody to resist indoctrination into another ideology. Established religions all have such immune system memes. That's why indoctrination of freshly minted atheists is so easy for Marxists.

Men come per-programmed with aspiration memes. Men naturally recognize social hierarchy and strive to climb it. Many men give up and become cucks or neets, but they still retain a kernel of independence of self. The meme of self-determination. It's not much, but it's something. Biologically, women don't even have this much, they are born followers. Women who have strong husbands and fathers aren't weak like this, but that's because they are following those strong men. Women without strong men to follow are completely vulnerable to indoctrination into nearly any system they encounter. The first they encounter will indoctrinate them and install its own memetic defenses to prevent itself from being overwritten.

Typically the first indoctrination system women without strong men in their lives encounter is university. Marxism walks right in the front door. Evicting Marxism is much harder because it closes the door after itself, by installing immune system memes to protect itself.

Let them go the way of Gawker brother!

nope, that would be much easier to work with.

I mean I know it sounds cliche but there's a reason those cliches exist. I almost went down the same road as her, and I can say that when you're immersed in the marxist worldview it's next to impossible to view other viewpoints as acceptable or anything short of evil. That's why so many of the far left people seem to be the same, it's because the views they have are not just to them the only socially acceptable ones, but also the only morally acceptable views to have

Jesus christ, that sounds like a terminal case.

Are they doomed to get no love? I feel sorry for girls who had awful childhoods. If they haven't been turned into whores then wouldn't it be fine? I'm sure there's always going to be some mental issues there but is it that bad?

Nothing is set in stone. You could have a good wife that had a bad childhood, that's something that happens. But you should be aware of the risks you're taking.

If such remain your intended path then I would suggest you learn how to deal with the problems commonly associated with that, just make sure you take the advice from the people who actually deal with these kind of things on a professional level.

It doesnt piss me off that these fuckers lie, but to lie so brazzingly
THESE FUCKERS

Check your priviledge dickhead
Every girl DESERVES to be treated like a god damn princess
EVERY

"Well, looks like I win!"

is he black?

Historic level bantz

holy shit my dick, is this pewdiepie?

...

I think maybe once she gets out of college things could turn up.


thank god no, but she has dated a kebab before as well as a nigger lesbo, as well as losing her virginity in middle school to a fucking ginger


I literally can't bring myself to look him in the eye anymore, it just makes me cringe. Not to mention whenever I visit there apartment I get a contact high when I walk through the door. It just hurts seeing someone you care about turn into such a charicature.

fug she even went into sculpting, and instead of doing classical art she makes shit like a teapot that looks like an obese disabled woman. it makes me sick to my stomach because I know she's not going to be able to find work after college, and I think she knows it too because when I asked her about it she said her plan was to become a college professor

Fucking really?
Get back on track niggers

The fuck? Why?

You are the exact reason why we're in the shit in the first place, cucks like you who pander to women, giving them the vote, pandering to their every whim.

I think women are naturally tender hearted, too soft, too compassionate etc.

Why on earth would I want to give them the vote, you dumb fuck?

The people who gave them the vote were stupid proto-nigtows who couldn't appreciate them for what they were and just assumed they were men with tits.

I have no clue, I've only ever dated whites and I can't comprehend what would drive someone to date outside their race


what about effeminate gay men? should they be allowed to vote?

Been there, done that (though probably to a lesser degree) and all I can say: Bull-fucking-shit. If you're capable of the faintest bit of critical thinking, the cracks soon surface. It starts off with simple questions that gradually gnaw at you with an overwhelming sense of cognitive dissonance that never ever stops. Here were the ones that showed the cracks for me.


Also what helps is being exposed to leftist overreaction. The mras cause a lot of that kind of overreaction.
What I mean by overreaction is people or groups of people making reasonable (to moderate liberals, not to full-on tumblrinas) suggestions and being met with being decried as hitler. Seeing reasonable propositions being met with massive vitriol from well-heeled news sources causes cognitive dissonance. What goes well when it comes to creating cd is when additional off-topic accusations are added to the mix. To stick to the mra example.
> Reaction: "They are homophobes, transphobes and racists" (simplified conflicts invoked: WhiteNon-White, healthy peoplefags, healthy peopletrannies
At first just subconsciously, it makes you think to yourself: What do all these other subjects have to do with what they said?

Generally a pattern for causing the cracks to emerge is the following. Marxists rely largely on their audience taking their word for what they are morally decrying. This is where you get the bluepilled faggots to listen. Thing X is decried for having said XYZ. The young, deluded marxist will take their word for it, because obviously, why would that news source they've been reading spin it? What you do then is show them whatever involved X saying XYZ.

I've just seen girls who have had messed up lives become one extreme or the opposite of it. Some women will become literal whores, while others will become reclusive and aloof. Both have the same issues, but just express them in different ways.
Is it still fine to date women who have become mentally unstable introverts? I'm wondering if they're just as intolerable as whores when you interact with them for long enough.

This is laughable, I understood women were the crueler sex as a child, boys that were bullied were laughed at by female staff, only male teachers ever gave a shit. Think back and you can recount countless anecdotes of your own I'm sure, but you're blinded, most likely.

The whole western tradition, and pretty much all philosophers taught that women were not only the weaker sex, but the more wicked one, that's what the myth of Pandora is about, Adam and Eve, and so on.

It's only romanticism in Europe that started to bring in contrary views (though this is taken wildly out of context, women were not venerated a priori, they had to earn it, as ladies), and kicked into overdrive in the Victorian era.

Nietzsche called this shit back in 1886

The weaker sex has in no previous age been treated with so much respect by men as at present–this belongs to the tendency and fundamental taste of democracy, in the same way as disrespectfulness to old age–what wonder is it that abuse should be immediately made of this respect? They want more, they learn to make claims, the tribute of respect is at last felt to be well-nigh galling; rivalry for rights, indeed actual strife itself, would be preferred: in a word, woman is losing modesty. And let us immediately add that she is also losing taste. She is unlearning to FEAR man: but the woman who "unlearns to fear" sacrifices her most womanly instincts. That woman should venture forward when the fear-inspiring quality in man–or more definitely, the MAN in man–is no longer either desired or fully developed, is reasonable enough and also intelligible enough; what is more difficult to understand is that precisely thereby– woman deteriorates. This is what is happening nowadays: let us not deceive ourselves about it! Wherever the industrial spirit has triumphed over the military and aristocratic spirit, woman strives for the economic and legal independence of a clerk: "woman as clerkess" is inscribed on the portal of the modern society which is in course of formation. While she thus appropriates new rights, aspires to be "master," and inscribes "progress" of woman on her flags and banners, the very opposite realises itself with terrible obviousness: WOMAN RETROGRADES. Since the French Revolution the influence of woman in Europe has DECLINED in proportion as she has increased her rights and claims; and the "emancipation of woman," insofar as it is desired and demanded by women themselves (and not only by masculine shallow-pates), thus proves to be a remarkable symptom of the increased weakening and deadening of the most womanly instincts. There is STUPIDITY in this movement, an almost masculine stupidity, of which a well-reared woman–who is always a sensible woman–might be heartily ashamed. To lose the intuition as to the ground upon which she can most surely achieve victory; to neglect exercise in the use of her proper weapons; to let-herself-go before man, perhaps even "to the book," where formerly she kept herself in control and in refined, artful humility; to neutralize with her virtuous audacity man's faith in a VEILED, fundamentally different ideal in woman, something eternally, necessarily feminine; to emphatically and loquaciously dissuade man from the idea that woman must be preserved, cared for, protected, and indulged, like some delicate, strangely wild, and often pleasant domestic animal; the clumsy and indignant collection of everything of the nature of servitude and bondage which the position of woman in the hitherto existing order of society has entailed and still entails (as though slavery were a counter- argument, and not rather a condition of every higher culture, of every elevation of culture):–what does all this betoken, if not a disintegration of womanly instincts, a defeminising? Certainly, there are enough of idiotic friends and corrupters of woman among the learned asses of the masculine sex, who advise woman to defeminize herself in this manner, and to imitate all the stupidities from which "man" in Europe, European "manliness," suffers,–who would like to lower woman to "general culture," indeed even to newspaper reading and meddling with politics. Here and there they wish even to make women into free spirits and literary workers: as though a woman without piety would not be something perfectly obnoxious or ludicrous to a profound and godless man;–almost everywhere her nerves are being ruined by the most morbid and dangerous kind of music (our latest German music), and she is daily being made more hysterical and more incapable of fulfilling her first and last function, that of bearing robust children.

cont -

They wish to "cultivate" her in general still more, and intend, as they say, to make the "weaker sex" STRONG by culture: as if history did not teach in the most emphatic manner that the "cultivating" of mankind and his weakening–that is to say, the weakening, dissipating, and languishing of his FORCE OF WILL–have always kept pace with one another, and that the most powerful and influential women in the world (and lastly, the mother of Napoleon) had just to thank their force of will–and not their schoolmasters–for their power and ascendancy over men. That which inspires respect in woman, and often enough fear also, is her NATURE, which is more "natural" than that of man, her genuine, carnivora-like, cunning flexibility, her tiger-claws beneath the glove, her NAIVETE in egoism, her untrainableness and innate wildness, the incomprehensibleness, extent, and deviation of her desires and virtues. That which, in spite of fear, excites one's sympathy for the dangerous and beautiful cat, "woman," is that she seems more afflicted, more vulnerable, more necessitous of love, and more condemned to disillusionment than any other creature. Fear and sympathy it is with these feelings that man has hitherto stood in the presence of woman, always with one foot already in tragedy, which rends while it delights–What? And all that is now to be at an end? And the DISENCHANTMENT of woman is in progress? The tediousness of woman is slowly evolving? Oh Europe! Europe! We know the horned animal which was always most attractive to thee, from which danger is ever again threatening thee! Thy old fable might once more become "history"–an immense stupidity might once again overmaster thee and carry thee away! And no God concealed beneath it–no! only an "idea," a "modern idea"!

I see what you mean, that does make sense. For me it was like dominoes, once the first one fell it opened up my mind to question all the other things I'd been taught. The reason I hadn't questioned them sooner was because the way they were taught to me is that I was first taught weak conservative arguments, and then taught the actual liberal views that would destroy the conservative arguments that had been designed to be weak. That way, it made me feel like I'd broken down a barrier that in reality was being built around me.

The best indoctrination makes the target believe they came to their conclusions of their own free will and in defiance towards someone in control, when it's actually the complete opposite.

I don't think I would've broken out of that unless I'd done what I did. With all the marxist world views, I ended up choosing to work in a hospital in a poor part of a crime ridden town, wanting to help the poor innocent people who were forced into such terrible conditions by the evil white people. When I realised that the people there just weren't like me but less fortunate, it shattered my world. Finding that different races actually were different, and that it's not racist to say so but just realistic, made me wonder what else was not as it seemed. With the help of the cop I started dating around that time, I eventually broke out of the marxist cycle. The weirdest thing is that even now, when I hear marxist liberal arguments, I can't but help find myself, on some level, agreeing with them despite knowing better.

Social ostracizing is a powerful tool for control

Nothing better in my life than that. I know exactly what goes on in these peoples empty heads because I used to be that stupid ignorant idiot who didn't understand the world. I was curious enough to break free and it wasn't illegal to question the narrative back when I was younger so lucky me, I suppose.

I met a femanon from an area code hook up thread on 4chan's /soc/ board.

She came from a well to do family from the suburbs of Delaware, moved to my city for an internship after college.

She had been involved with mostly women before we went out. What irked me was that everyone knew, except her parents. She rented out an apartment she barely lived in while cohabting with her ex of four and a half years, just in case her parents were in town.

Among other red flags, I felt like I was her beard while she waited out the clock for her inheritance once her Dad kicked the bucket. The second half of our relationship consisted of trying not to let it bother me, only to be reminded of it or have it surface every few months.

One time, I asked her to write out her narrative. I sent her parents a copy when I broke up with her, throwing her double life into a dumpster fire. Pic related, it was page two.

Sage for off topic post.

They should be thrown into the bog, obviously.

Just saw this in another thread. Pretty much sums up what changirls are like.
8ch.net/whore.txt

Lel I also met up with an user from Delaware and she was just as batshit.

Was she on the spectrum? A weeb? Did she come from money? I swear, that state is cursed.

Brutal.

Short asian weeb.

...

I don't buy this, the "insipid woman veneration" that Schopenhauer talks about and Nietzsche references here is indeed real, but women really are markedly more tender hearted than men.

I think the worst femanon I've ever encountered was from /soc/. She had been systematically abused by her dad from a very early age, I mean he would do shit like tie her up and act out BDSM fantasies on her. It's a sign of what a fragile fag I am that hearing this stuff used to kill me inside. Predictably she became hypersexual and started banging people all over the place. I mean her partner count was huge, must have been 40 or 50.

That said, I think there's a difference in kind between the sorts of girls who lurk boards like /soc/ and /r9k/ - they're both prone to the same sort of behavior online, namely camwhoring, but /soc/ anons tend to be more recent arrivals from Holla Forums who go straight to /soc/ - whereas /r9k/ types come straight from the topical boards where they've probably resided for many years. The latter are closer to your typical 4channer, the /soc/ type in some cases have absolutely nothing in common with your average 4channer though. The end result is that /soc/ femanons are way more likely to be actual promiscuous turbosluts, whereas /r9k/ femanons are often virgins or have been single for years.

Even by femanon standards, she's kind of low tier. He didn't lose much.

And the true femanons, who lurk and don't post photos or tits, or mention their femaleness in any way more than a passing gag…

Maybe, one day, after years of being married to a based qt, when all barriers of trust have been surmounted…

you'll find out she was watching you all along.

This will be the true testing point of your relationship.

Until then, don't trust any girl who breaks the anonymity code, that's automatic rejection from being a channer. /r9k/ included. Emo angst is for tumblr.

It's not like anonymity is truly manly, in the "one must chop down a tree to enter" way.

I meet them quite often. It's easy to tell someone's gender by the way they type. Or how they think.
Generally, the first step that wizards fail at is recognising that women do think, but in an entirely unaggressive way, not being biologically built for direct aggression.

you mean indirect aggression, the female equivalent of fisticuffs?

For example, both responding incorrectly to a shill:
a guy: "how does it feel like to be a kike? go tell cia chief he's a niggerlover"
a girl: "obvious shill is obvious, I see why they have you on night duty"

hint: empathy and social unity is inherent to feminity, google what grey matter is for, while sympathy is inherent to masculinity

Used to date one. Can confirm all of this aside from the camwhoring. She was so fucking crazy want me to nearly kill when fucking.

wanted me to nearly kill her*

shit

This intrigues me. I'd like to know more about what you mean by this.


The thing is, I've met girls I've dated and liked from 4chan precisely because they did mention that to me, eventually anyway (some kept it hidden for a while).

Jesus Christ. Have we all had femanon gfs at one point or another?

I'm really surprised by this. I'm guessing it's because Holla Forums has a lot of the oldfag crowd (at least from 07 onwards anyway) who remember when 4chan was less frenetic and more of a community.

WTF happened to my thread?!

Maybe you shouldn't have been such a fag, OP.

Molynjew has two things preventing him from being anything more than a bridge:

1. His blood
2. His anti-corporal punishment stance

...

Neurology.
Empathy: female babies show most interest in faces. Empathy is when your neurons change to reflect the emotions of the faces that you see, and you react accordingly. "Feeling with someone." Important for social structures, reacting fluidly as a whole. Controlled by grey matter. One of the traits of being female is having more of it. Being emotionally part of a whole.

Sympathy: male babies show most interest in moving objects. Sympathy in neurological terms is logic; seeing where something is and using this to predict where it goes. "Feeling for someone." Important for spatial reasoning skills. Associated with white matter, which males have more of. Being physically present.


This is reflected in everything else we already know about gender differences, really. Playing with dolls - creating imaginary people, projecting emotions, practicing emotional interactions and outcomes.
Playing with rocks and sticks outdoors - creating territories, practicing spatial reasoning, imaginary spatial defense scenarios.

I present to you, Hillary supporters.
he leaks the "wrong files" and suddenly he is considered bad.

>lmpIying he didn't do it on purpose. :^)

this guy is the only one not larping of having a user gf, the others are trs mgtow aids ridden faggots

there is a thing called citir or CTR, lurk more fag

welcome to the world of imageboards, where you can reply to several posts simultaneously.
now kill yourself.

So the faggots who're the mouthpiece for Podesta & Co. are calling people pedos?

I'm calling it now, failure to make things right and some of that insurance goodness is going to be dipped into.

This just depresses me, it depresses me that some of the most racially aware guys on the internet are still hopelessly cucked, without changing women, you can't change anything. And most of 8/pol/ is _largely_ content with women as they are, opting to shame men for not living up to preposterous standards, like some reddit white knight.

I don't get it really, even cuck/pol/ is less cucky when it comes to women, in spite of the nadir it's suffering.

tits or GTFO

9. Monarchist.

Should he fail, will it be because he's planning to sue a 'respected' American organization for something said about him from someone who wasn't even part of the organization, and he's just some Aussie criminal?

Will the American people be outraged if he fails, even with evidence, or will the masses just blow this off as another national security threatening attempt of espionage or lizard Jews from another dimension? Do you guys REALLY fucking care about WHY he does what he does? Or do you only care about the fate of these 'evil' organizations, regardless of who's to thank?

CNN isn't going to bend to this Assange's threats. And Assange will attempt to sue CNN. And CNN will likely win. And we won't do a god damn mother fucking thing. And that's why most of you will never amount anywhere close to the true ideologies of your long-passed political leaders and rulers. And you will never understand who they truly were. Or why they did what they did.

You're just a bunch of fanboys too afraid to act out against the tyranny corrupting your world because you can't even get out of your chairs for any other reason but to grab a beer or smoke. And you make just as sick as CNN ever possibly could.

...

...

You can't simultaenously hate women and think they're inferior to men at managing a nation (I agree with the last part) and then blame them as if they should have the same sorts of responsibilities a man should.

The point is that men and women should not have the same sorts of responsibilities to begin with! This is a necessary part of your belief system, so why hold them to a man's standards like a nigtow mra reddit faggot?


Because of /r9k/'s irritating cross-board influence.

That's cool, you two have known each other for at least 12 years?

Every alphabet soup company has been trying to find something on Assange and Assange right now has no "known" access to the internet. I don't think they thought this far.

They would probably be extorted anyway.

Why not just have Trump give the whistle blowers Pardons.

For the cherry on top i say make Snowden the head of the agency he use to work at.

For once CNN did something brilliant. They forced Assange to come out of hiding. I honestly assumed he'd been dead for months already.

14 actually. We met playing an MMO back in the day when playing those types of games were for shut in losers. She was my pocket healing shaman for a good 2 years and we talked a lot. Eventually I met her and shit just clicked that well.

Are you two dating? That's pretty cool if so.

niggerly underrated post, anonymous.

to all you faggot who don't remember, pay your respects to Seth Rich, a fallen hero in the name of truth

Can Confirm too, I actually met my ex cause I saw her camwhoring on cancerchan(I kinda stole her from the camwhore thread and made her my own) I was depressed enough to fall for it when she asked me if i liked her.
Which is also her huge issue, she leeches onto anyone that shows her any sort of affection and then throws them away the second someone else comes along.
I had another girlfriend just like that who was on failchan as well.

Anyways back to the whore, shes half white half latino.
It was before I became racially aware, even if right-wing already. Last time I talked to her she became tumblr infested(short-ish hair, POSITIVE BODY IMAGE(who the fucks spreads that shit) and she had become really biased towards white ppl and adored black ppl).
What a mess.
Luckily she was never white so its not a huge loss. But its still tragic cause she used to have such potential before she made a tumblr account.

tl;dr all the failchan girls i went out with where sinking ships from the get-go.

for real we have proof of life from JA?

We'll never forget his sacrifice though he will never be named.

Speaking of such subjective matters is unwise, especially in public forums. Look up "positive feedback loop".

your not even arguing anymore. Understanding the obvious differences between the sexes is to explore them, not to resent them. Yes, Women should be examined much more thourougly as to their political choices, but that's not what you two were arguing in the first place. What you were arguing before was a subjective matter based on personal experiences from you and naïvète from the other guy. you could could go around in circles for hours and still not demonstrate to him the validity of you experience, because he has no such experience that he is willing to recall.

tfw they find out opposite sex:D

Typical kike mindset (even if not a kike, he's as good as one) to blame the person telling the truth for what you're actually doing.

I grew up on the Texas messcan border, alienated White wasn't a mere feeling and it was long before 2017.

Nice way of saying "hugbox".

This is the kind of behavior I'm used to seeing in the SJW cult as the go-to response to being promptly rekt, but it's already been established how SJW is connected to various (((interests)))

So, it's been more than 48 hours. Did anything happen? I feel like Assange is getting to KimDotCom levels of blue-ballsing.

OK, where's your proof?


OK, where's your proof?

to their children/family, perhaps.

to the outgroup? No way.