The dildo protest is coming to UT Austin

moar lliek
Let the rage flow thu u: youtube.com/watch?v=lJ73NwJ_Zlw

Direct link to mp4: a.cuntflaps.me/nvfqcr.mp4

(Polite sage for replying to myself)

I'm not pro-guns. I just think it's inevitable that almost everyone will have the ability to manufacture firearms at home within 50 years. Trying to prevent that is as futile as trying to prevent piracy (although considerably more noble).

I still think being "pro-gun" is stupid. No war worth fighting will be won or lost on the basis of civilian-owned weapons. You should be figuring out how to win a war of propaganda and media manipulation - not how to lead a peasant uprising in the 19th century. You'd be far better spending your time learning to crack wifi networks or spoof GPS signals than at the firing range learning how to get referred to as an "armed terrorist" in the headlines.

Of course, I don't think America will have any revolutionary potential for at least a few decades, so it doesn't really matter what you guys do. Hand out grenades to preschoolers if it makes you feel safer.

No need to; in a few years preschoolers will 3d print the grenades themselves.

That won't happen for at least a hundred years.

...

The revolution will be won or lost by which side the military and media end up on. Your neighbor with a gun is just as likely to turn against you in the event of revolution if you don't control the propaganda.

Take BlackLivesMatter, for instance. Do you think they stand the slightest chance of achieving anything if the media push the claim that they're all criminal thugs? If the average person can be turned against the revolution, you're fucked. They'll just call in air-strikes and say that it was necessary to fight domestic terrorism.

This isn't the 19th century any more. A semiautomatic rifle isn't the pinnacle of military technology.

Then we have probably lost.

Guns are for guys with small dicks anyway

Where do you think geurillas and insurgents get their weapons? They capture them sure, but I'd rather go into the fight with an SKS than a shotgun made from a pipe.

Murderer of innocent phasianidae.

Nice guns, tho

I think you mean delicious phasianidae.

Is that a glorious Yugo SKS?

Russian, Tula 1952. Yugos have the grenade launcher.

Holla Forums pls go

Dicks out for Harambe

THIS

Also all of the sexual repression and sexual taboos in this country are rooted in porky obsession.

Anything that gets fuck wad conservative reactionaries panties in a bunch is alright in my book.

YOU DON'T SAY
fucking liberals

what's with all you fucking liberals on this board tonight

stop being equally reactionary, or are you baiting/dividing on purpose?

either way lurk more or go away

Spare me, open carry is intended to give reactionary useful idiots something to make themselves feel like big men.

They get off on scaring the fuck out of everyone, porky gets a stronger wedge issue, and other proles have to live with the fear of not know if the person carrying a gun is another crazy shooter.

All of which distracts everyone from addressing the contradictions of capitalism.

If you'd read the fucking article, you would know it's concealed carry.

Whic is par for the course for the rest of your idiotic comment.

Fuck off.

Holla Forums constantly complains about identity politics.

Open carry has gotta be one of the most obvious applications of identity politics every.

Only white straight reactionary guys can practically take advantage of it. It pisses everyone one else off, then said straight white guys cry about muh second amendment or muh Karl Marx said we gotta be armed.

This is gotta be the most nakedly concession to white cis identity politics but same said cis white guys will blow an artery if black people bring up reparations or police brutality.

I said open carry. Re read my comment.

That's even worse. I don't have to read every article on this issue, I've read plenty on gun control and Texas in particular.

That's some kinda inverted no true scottsman. Instead of "All true X's do/have Y", it's "All people with Y are X"

READ THE ARTICLE NIGGA

Fuck off liberal

Steel and wood have no ideology

Huuuuurrrrrrrrr

...

Goddamn can you at least try to present a counter point to what I'm saying.

I've read other articles about this protest. I support it, it's a great non violent way to protest these ridiculously lax gun laws that are only passed to placate reactionary angry white guys the GOP regulars uses as useful idiots.

Trump didn't let people take guns to his rallies did he?

You're on the wrong board fam

You don't support democratic governance? The students and faculty don't want firearms on their campus.

Just because it triggers NEETs that don't know anything about history or the military industry complex in particular isn't a good enough reason to deny them what they want.

>>>/reddit/

...

Any tankie will tell you the proletariat needs to be armed and the anarchists… huh, good luck, even most reddit anarchists are against gun control. It's time to leave.

Whatever you say Grand Dragon.

Get the fuck back to >>>/tumblr/

How the fuck is saying the lax gun control laws in this country aren't a way for the GOP to gain support from reactionary white guys.

You gotta be FOOKIN blind not to notice who is supporting this lax gun laws. And yes only white guys can effectively take advantage of these lax gun laws. That's just truth.

Answer my original question. If the students and faculty don't want firearms on their campus, should they be force by the state to allow them?

...

Laugh all you want. If you'd had any brains you'd recognize this and address it, then maybe someone under 40 and not white would show up at your NRA meetings.

How, then, do you propose we shoot the bourgeoisie?

Wew lad

It's the other way around fuckface. Dems wanting gun control just pushes otherwise sympathetic whites into the hands of the Right.

TIL racism is literally magic

How's your African interpretative dance class going?

...

I don't believe violent revolution is practical. The military industrial complex is way to big and powerful.

The Nazi war machine wasn't even half of what the US military industrial complex strength it and it took the combined forces of the US, UK and USSR to stop them.

You're going to have to convince a critical mass of proles to just not do their jobs that support the military. That's the only practical way I see of over throwing the bourgious.

Interesting read. I wish I could get links to the government studies he talks about.

Sorry I don't believe we have to kiss the asses of reactionary proles.

You're wasting your time if you think you're going to get any of the deeply reactionary and proudly ignorant GOP political base to turn against capitalism.

I don't even waste my time talking to fools like that. I talk to the disaffected people that don't vote or are apathetic to politics.

Better disarm the populace just to be sure!

Damn, it's like I'm talking to a Rush Limbaugh ditto head.

Nice ad hominum attack

It's already happening, in a way. Republican neoliberalism is giving way to Trumpian protectionist populism.

Every war machine falls apart in case of civil war, because the assets in question get used by both sides. And America's military in particular has proven remarkably incompetent lately - just ask the Taliban.

I don't see the military tolerating a general strike against military industry without violent repression. I also think that if we're going to ask workers to risk said violent repression, they should be armed and prepared to fight back.

Practically all the victims of gun violence are poor proles.

How many bourgious have been shot by civilian firearms comrade?

...

Dear god stop the presses!

Cultural Marxism, friends! This is your tax dollars at work, mind you

I never said poor people are more violent you ass hat. They are more VULNERABLE to violence from gangs or organized crime since they don't have the CAPITAL to have an effective police force protect them.

FUCK ME, you really think the typical boregious worries about begin alone at night in their gated community. Please remove your head from you ass.

Uh no it's not. Got damn quit being so butt hurt all the time and actually look at the demographics of the kind of people who support gun control.

Yeah race politics is such bullshit, that's how the GOP became a national party using the Southern Strategy. And it's just a COINCIDENCE that gun control was a wedge issue that they could use to get reactionary white guys to vote for them.

Dear god, if only there were some sort of ranged metal tube like weapons they could defend themselves with!

So you're saying we could get them on our side if we stop the gun control.

You're point is well taken. But I did say a "critical mass" as in a number too large to effectively coerce with violence.

I worked for the military industrial complex for 12 years. I've been around soldiers for all my life. I can tell that there's almost nothing that would get them to turn against their pay masters.

You gotta remember we have an economic draft. Practically everyone who joins the US military is DESPERATE to be there, they really had no other option.

I'm talking about the much more well paid factory workers not working. The US's weapons systems need RIDICULOUS amounts of parts and other forms of industrialized support, if that stopped the military pretty much stops working.

No I'm saying if we had some gun control proles that have to live in poor neighborhoods with violent gangs effectively turnign their neighborhoods into fiefdoms would get some breathing room.

Then we'd have a CHANCE to turn them to our side.

...

I don't know what planet you live on where you think the NRA and Republicans supports the 2nd amendment because they hope to someday overthrow the bourgious.

There is waaaay too much sexual repression in this country. I can't believe how booty bothered people are getting about this protest.

-gun rights is a "wedge issue" that the republicans used to amass voters

-all gun rights advocates were irredeemable reactionaries in the first place

Pick only one faggot

It's called generalizing to broke dick NEET. We have more gun deaths in the US then any other 1st world country.

White ignorant racist reactionaries that form the political base support gun control because they want a violent cludge to intimidate other races and identities that they blame their problems on.

Only a tiny minority of proles even have guns. But in the meantime our lax gun laws allow violent criminals to intimate and exploit proles.

No bourgious are dying due to gun violence in this courntry, but a whole lot of hard working men women and children are.

You still didn't disprove his point if it's a wedge issue then they'd be voting democrat otherwise. All you keep screaming is that anyone that supports gun rights is a racist reactionary. Is if that constitutes a an argument. Gun control is not a remotely left wing position.

HMM I WONDER WHAT THE SOLUTION COULD BE

I WONDER WHAT COULD POSSIBLY EMPOWER ALL THESE PROLES AND MINORITIES TO DEFEND THEMSELVES

kys faggot

This is nonsense. Violent gangs are bourgious and organized.

To effectively counter them the proles need to be organized also. Unless you expect poor proles to work 2 exploitative jobs then come home and organize a counter to violent then using the state to make guns more scarce is the way to go.

Also most poor proles don't want to take up that role for themselves. They just want their family and their person to be safe.

Arming everyone just escalates tensions, poor proles know this, which is why barely any of them have guns even though they are widely available.

It doesn't disprove my point that we have the most gun violence of any 1st world counrty, and we beat out a lot of poor countries too.

I'm sure they remained completely fair and unbiased when they conducted that study.

Your waifu is bourgeois.

They'll never vote democrat even if the democrats supported the second amendment.

Republicans get support for that wedge issue from reactionary whites because those reactionary whites see the 2nd amendment as a part white nativism.

These reactionaries don't just want the right to bear arms they want the power to intimidate black people, brown people and women and anyone else they believe if they didn't exisit their own shitty economic status would be better.

That's why all these bullshit conseal carry laws get passed. You can't take out your fustration on any one with your piece on your side unless you can go out in public with it.

Why does it matter if it is first world? DO you even know what first world means? The first world designation literally just refers to American/NATO aligned nations during the cold war. The image just proves the point that access to firearms doesn't correlate to homicides committed with a firearm.

They didn't conduct the study you smug retard. Look at the source listed in the bottom left corner.

How are they not organized? They have an honor code of some sort, they work together to take capital from vulnerable proles in their neighborhood.

They control markets through violence. They're just porkies but willing to apply violence themselves instead of using the state.

Actually since they almost always work with police to some degree that's not really true either.

This tbh you should never take a conservative at face value on shit like this

But people's personal weapons that they didn't get from the military would still be basically irrelevant to the conflict in this case. In the meantime, reducing the number of guns in civilian hands could help reduce murder and suicide, and also reduce mass killings by terrorists which give political excuses for expanding the surveillance state.

I want reddit to leave

Where's that comic of the 21st century Anarchist in Revolutionary Catalonia? Just seems appropriate.

Top Kek. Also the NRA has blocked the CDC from conducting an really big studies into gun violence as a health issue

Do you think the NRA did that because the CDC would find that lax gun laws are a really big public health issue in this cournty…naaaah couldn't be. It's because the NRA wants the proletariat to be armed for the revolution.

NO SHIT

And when every other point you have made has been refuted, you resort to defeatism.

Then they will die like the dogs they have chosen to make themselves.

More ad hoc hypothesizing, armchair psychology, and outright fabrications. But all in the service of subjecting the proletariat to the control of mama state!

Oh, so now if you make a point and it gets debunked you just repeat it? Like talking to a brick wall.

No they need the weapons for training and basic defense until they can seize better equipment. I can't believe that you actually consider yourself a radical leftist and are for the bourgeois state having a monopoly on guns because of a little liberal fear mongering. Kys reformist scum.

no

I said the NRA blocked the CDC from conducting large studies on gun violence in the US out of fear it would produce scienfic proof that gun violence is a major health problem in the US.

ESSPECIALLY IF YOU ARE A POOR PROLE.

But the well being of poverty stricken proles couldn't matter less to you reactionary dick weeds.

THIS

Oh now we're reactionary duckweeds because we don't support gun control. Is that your go to respond when ever anyone disagrees with you? You're just embarrassing yourself at this point liberal.

Where do all these tankies and liberals keep coming from? This board has been getting really shit these past couple months.

Remind me again how you are going to deal with capitalism if you think revolution is impossible, all republicans are irredeemable reactionaries, and you want to disarm the proletariat.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Rifle_Association#Elections

I'm not denying organization. Saying they're inherently bourgeois is wrong. Not every violent criminal owns property, and I've seen collective ownership before.
Don't have a lawboner.

You're reactionary because you continue to ignore the death toll of primary poor proles our gun laws are having in this country.

Commisar Cletus here, guess I'm a wealthy racist reactionary now despite being poor and socialist who almost married a Mexican and is best man at a black guys gay wedding. Thanks for letting me know, I'm sure I'll enjoy those gated suburbs much more than my shitty apartment when I collect my money from the white muh privilege fund.

How incredibly anti-capitalist of them.

All gangs have territory that they run their rackets on. They protect said territory for other gangs and coerce proles in those territories into being exploited with violence or the threat of violence. How is this not effectively private property.

People continue to advertise on reddit and Facebook even though we warned them that the userbases are filled with stupid assholes. This is the worst I've seen though. This is actually just pure liberalism.

Wow you're anecdote totally destroys my argument.

The demographic information available on who owns guns supports my point.

The only thing I want to argue about is the NRA. It's not a left-wing organization.

What's your point ? It's not like the Democratic party is left wing in any remote way. They both have their pet issues. It certainly doesn't make gun rights is a ring wing issue. Especially because the left has always supported gum freedom for the proles. How the fuck else are we suppose to fight back against the wealthy? Politely asking the state to give us some high powered weapons when we need them.?

...

Not always, no.

Not every organized group of criminals willing to utilize violence does this.

Sure say owning your own lab is private property, but, co-ops.

You do realize that comment you originally replied to was sarcastic right

Don't lie to us. I know you and your redneck buddies go around with your guns lynching blacks and raping women. Don't lie. literally the only reason people own guns is to terrorize marginalized people. Now if you don't want to be a complete fuccboi hand over your guns to your local friendly police officer and quietly return to your mansion. If you want to help the revolution vote Democrat in the next election and Madam President Hillary will take care of everything.

No. It's done so the gun manufacturers can sell more guns. They don't need to be doing it oour interest for it to be soemthing that benefits us.

I will never surrender!!!!

Liberty to intimidate niggers on college campuses or death!!!!!!

Top kek

they're provided by foreign governments or remnants of their own government, or they come from dispersed elements of the regular army. these elements provide the nucleus of the battalions firepower. auxilliary service personnel, local militia, and police, will be able to bring individual weapons as a rule. additional weapons will be gathered from poorly policed battlefields, weapons collected from dead enemies. Privately owned guns of marksmen, collectors, or hunters will be donated voluntarily because they run the risk of execution if the enemy finds they concealed them. civilian arms shops and police stations will also be requisitioned. heavy weapons can be collected from downed aircraft or helicopters.

OMG I can't even. Why are white men even allowed to use the internet? How come there isn't a law against it? Why can't you see that we can only live in an equitable society if we put all our trust into unaccountable government bureaucrats?

Guns are a right fam, as they should be. Democracy is limited by constitutional rights, which is how it should be. Liberals crying about scary salt rifles isn't justification to restrict a constitutional right.

...

That shit all comes later. There are plenty of examples of insurgent groups entering combat with civilian arms, before finally being supplied by capturing enemy weapons or by a foreign force. The Mau Mau in Kenya, Viet Minh, and Afghan Mujahadeen all began the war with muskets and guns made from pipes.

I'll take my semiauto thank you.

because in american society prudes like you are easily shocked by non-commodified sexuality

see: the shitstorm that happens whenever someone breastfeeds in public

polyp or no I'd say his criticism, while like the other end of the horseshoe is overly broad and stereotypes his opposition, is a valid one where it applies. Using dildos as a means of political protest seems to be ineffectual at best and counterproductive at worst when not disrupting a speech or other public event (Dildocopters of Doom or Ansche Cheung), or protesting something related to sexuality (UK porn ban).

You 'Muricans and your guns.

Why do you need to carry a gun in a campus anyway?

I don't get you people.

'Murican culture is the expeled puritan british culture. Thus, you can see all the blood and gore on TV but not a single tit. And this creates the counter of "sex everywhere" that is exactly the same, as it is purely reactionary.

Also "non-commodified". KEKEKEKEKEKEKEK

...

If American universities are as pozzed as the rest of the world's universities, I really doubt a significant number of students are packing heat in the classroom.

Yes. While US turned it into a comodity that is to be watched in secret, payed more than worth and never talked about.

Also, UK didn't "ban porn". It only applied neoliberal SJWism.

...

What can I say! People still buy consoles and think piratiing vidya is bad or something!
Same logic, people pay for porn.

I don't know what's wrong with the US and it's comodity fetishist ethics.

walking around with literal sex toy products on your backpack

That is a perfect image, thank you kindly for sharing it.

what the fuck

Don't forget the Russian revolution, with Obrez pistols made from Mosin-Nagants.

People actually pay for porn?

shut the fuck up retard

That's a hilarious conspiracy theory. A shame you don't believe in it yourself. No srsly, I kek'd hard reading that!

(Vid not related)