City of Cannes bans full-body swimsuits, calling them "a symbol of Islamic extremism"?

All the islamists are just going to buy drysuits and claim to be snorkelling.

...

Western conservatives are worse than retarded.

Big Swim wear at it again. When will people wake up to the REAL ISSUES? I can't go a day without society goading me into buying flippers.

It's another episode of 'Middle aged Euro-trash reactionaries vote for laws made to piss of and further alienate Islamic reactionaries'.

It truly is a spectacle.

It's should be pretty clear to anyone with a brain that the real issue around the world is that people are bathing with to much clothes on. All the material wasted on full body swimsuits is the bane of civilization.

telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/terrorism-in-the-uk/10425181/Terror-suspect-who-escaped-in-burka-had-alleged-electronic-tag-tampering-court-case-dropped.html

Banning a niqab and hijab along with ski masks in some settings is acceptable and good but this is kinda dumb.

sorry I meant burka not hijab.

what a retard. who would know that isis and alqaeda allowed women to go on the beach with a tight burkini showing their faces lol

Stupid statist tyrrany but I'm okay with it because fuck muslims.

and no banning clothings is NEVER acceptable
i want to go around covering my face because it's deformed. shouldnt i because og "muh security"? screw that
so yeah i support the right of women to wear whatever they want included burqa if they wish, let alone an innocent burkini

it basically doesnt allow non muslims to cover themselves more. oh this is really great..
i cant wear shorts at the beach because of this law. doesnt make sense to me

You've never even been in the sea, have you?

This fucks more than just muslims you spiteful baby.

Secularism has become its own religion.
This is fucking insane.

No one forced them to go to France there are plenty of countries with culture similar to mena shitholes (Germany and Sweden)

get fucked Holla Forums

So, Canada is the same as US?

This is literally no different from banning miniskirts, except their reasoning is muh islamofascism rather than muh decency.
Both are fucking stupid.

Muslim women "want" to wear the hijab the same way a person "wants" to surrender their wallet when facing the business end of a shotgun.

...

...

...

...

...

...

So why not take steps to combat that problem instead of banning a piece of clothing that probably isn't only used by people who are forced to.

liberal logic

The givernment should just ban all clothing tbh. Modesty is spooky.

HURR

...

Frances has been fighting off islam indirectly for the past decade using "laicité" as a straw man.

according to new French laws ostentatious religious sins in public places aren't allowed.

in reality, no one will complain about nuns, priests or rabbis walking around in kappas.

this also brought the slippery slope, there is no solid definition of "ostentation religious sign"
and recently a girl has been kicked out from her school because her dress was deemed too long, i swear this isn't a joke.

i dislike islam as much as the next guy but this is some hypocritical passive aggressive shit the only spineless frogs could come up with.

have some balls and ban islam

Even aside from the fact that Muslim women living in the West often wear the veil/burqa/hijab by choice, a legal prohibition of the burqa is the lowest form of liberal fixation on superstructural fixes.

If you want to eliminate oppressive/coercive norms, focus on the material conditions that lead to oppression/coercion. Otherwise you’re not truly concerned with liberating women, as much as unclothing them.

No, liberal logic is shit like , i.e. "there's nothing wrong with Islam itself, any extremism that happens is just because our society isn't accommodating enough"

thats Holla Forumstard logic 101.

Lol

Unless you can provide proof otherwise, yes.

forgot shiposting flag

duh, they don't care.
just like this law isn't about laicité, its about being a dick to muslim.
its just an excuse.
just like the wmd in Iraq, the so cald dictator in Syria and the "nazi" in Crimea.

I guess working for $3 a day in a textile factory in Bangladesh so you don't starve to death is technically a choice as well.

That's not the west you fucking retard.

If you don't think girls from Algeria born and raised in South France aren't being "gently" coerced to wear a hijab you're just another dumb fuck white kid from the suburbs that doesn't know anything.

any sauce to back that up ?

Again, you have zero proof.

even if he did, this law wouldn't help them. if anything it will just make life more difficult for them.

but year, right wing fags regularly lie to themselves and truly believe they're the good guys

These are the same people who whine about "Cultural Marxism", wew.

I guess all those honor killings are over dinner time disagreements of whose favorite tv show is the best then.

dodging the question i see, how typical

Honor killings aren't coercion now?

What do they have to do with swimsuits?

stuff like this is just concession the elite make to the far right, basically saying, okay you can still be french but we are still going to flood the country with muslims.
Its like a bandaid for a shotgun wound.
The west is ruled by out of touch globalists who dont suffer the consequences of immigration and terrorism in their gated communities.
France has been attacked by Islamic terror over and over again and all the globalist can say is you will have to learn to live with it, there is a brewing rightwing revolt in france that could elect marine le pen, the elite are scared

you're blinded by hatred, and you think that spreading your hatred will somehow alter my objectivity.
i have a bad news for you, user.
not everyone is as week minded as you are.
if you want to let your feefeel take control thats fine, but don't try to pretend to be rational, thats just ridiculous.

we really live in ass backwards world when you think about it.
Stuff like the hijab and burka are patriarchal, women must cover their filthy bodies in Islam.
But the regressive left defends it out of cultural relativism, to them brown people can do no wrong, so they are defending a patriarchy.
While the right wing want to get rid of it to defend western culture, but when you think about the rightwing are actually getting rid of an ancient patriarchal culture, something the left should be doing.

This is your reality on globalism

...

I thought we were talking abouy whether or not wearing the hijab is a choice. Doesn't seem to be much of a choice when the threat of being killed by your father or brother is always looming over your head.

You're the objective one for believing women have a choice in a culture in where they're basically cattle and baby making machines?

We're not defending it, we just think banning swimsuits is stupid. It's a meaningless spectacle. It solves nothing. You don't end patriarchal culture by banning clothing, you do it through revolution.

Prepare for the avalanche of autists for that trigger word.

of what? Jews already left, you've got no one to gas. You'll just pass shitty trade tariffs and supress labour unions, you're not a fucking threat to anyone but Historical Progression.

if they're living in the West they're already going to school, that's more than enough for me. Thinking clothing is political is tumblr tier and you fucking know it.

Muslim clothing is turned political by the left.
The right defend western culture, the liberals are all " anyone should be allowed to do anything they want if it doesnt hurt anyone nyeh"

Europe, especially has weak culture, this is why their Muslims dont assimilate.
America has a strong nationalism and Christianity that envelops immigrants.

The left defends a patriarchy in the name of fighting their own rightwing.

Much like how they defend mass immigration even though it only benefits global capitalism

Ass backwards.

Liberals are right wing.

Fix you yankiness!

Not really, America just preselects immigrants so that the ones coming from places that aren't Mexico tend to behave themselves, and most Mexicans are nice enough people anyway. This isn't the case with Muslim immigration to Europe.

Except it isn't? You're the ones banning it for political reasons, it means as much to most people as a Kippar or problem glasses.

Fashion is art, and the way you are percvied by the world aesthetically, all of that shit is political.
The nazis were very fashionable, even if you hate them they had a contract with hugo boss after all.
I saw a snippet of a documentary describing how mao destroyed ancient Chinese fashion and forced everyone to wear pajamas.

Most of everyones clothes are created in third world sweatshops.
The destruction of islamic imagery placates the far right so that globalism can continue to flood the nation.

In conclusion, take it away bowie

youtube.com/watch?v=GA27aQZCQMk

I knew an American Muslim who was married to a Muslim man who would not allow her to leave the house without a burka.

not sure how I feel about border control

I worry that overwhelming numbers of migrants could shock the system of these states and move them rightward

But they're still largely oppressive lines, whose worship only perpetuates statist thought

The deeper issue is that socially/culturally controversial policies are used to steer/agitate the public opinion.

This is the political class banging a gong and throwing a metaphoricall ball for the media to play with.

amazing how you turn everything to your feels.
you didn't post a single objective argument in the whole thread to back up this law.
all you say is

Nobody cares about your imaginary clash of civilizations. What they do care about is their civil liberties.

Don't worry, indigenous white French people will be a minority in their own ancestral homeland soon thanks to non-white immigration and a higher non-white birth rate. Once the Arabs are the majority they can just out-vote the natives and lift the ban.

Do Isis use women for their attacks in Europe?

I supported when they banned the Burka on grounds of practicality, equality and security. I can't see the case for any of these in terms of a 'Burkini' though.

in literally over a hundred years*

its a proven lie made by stormfags, and it will never happen.
immigrants end up having the same birthrate as the native, and we're basically back to square one, the state has to keep a constant flow of immigrants to keep the economy afloat.
as the number of immigrants rise their integration will worsen and sometimes not happen at all because they'll end up in an immigrant community, they don't have to adapt.

this will obviously end bad, but the people in charge don't seem to care

The state can fuck off with this. Guest workers, temp workers, 'doctors and lawyers', refugees. Every time a different justification, every time the same result.

Most of Western Europe (i.e. France, UK, Germany) is only kept "~95% white" because white Boomers (and older) have skewed the age pyramid.

If you want to see the future of any society, look at its youngest generations - or you'll end up like the Maronites of Lebanon scratching their heads at becoming a minority in their own homeland

Yes yes, keep burying your head in the sand, surely if Turks didn't assimilate into German society when Germany was 98% German they'll assimilate even easier when it's 50% German - hell, maybe they have a point about the burka (I mean enforcing burkas as a social norm would go a long way towards curbing male fetishisation of the female form…)

You all know that America will be majority non-white by 2042. Why is that? Because 90% of legal immigrants are non-white, combined with tens of millions of non-white illegal immigrants, all of whom have higher birth rates than white Americans.

So what makes you think the same thing won't happen in Europe as well?

Restricting the personal freedom of anyone for any reason is unacceptable, unless that freedom infringes upon the basic human rights of another person.

If they hate islamofascism so much, they should really try not to imitate it's authoritarian bullshit.

no one give a fuck about your ethnic nationalism, stormweenie.
particularly when it comes to USA, whites aren't native

Just as master Soros planned.

So what's your excuse for Europe, where whites ARE native?

Who cares.

France seems to have the worst approach to immigration. Invite everybody in, then piss them all off.

Then bomb schools in their home country.

How's prepping the bull going for ya, buddy?

Got anything else to say? I don't believe in racialism.

The last time white people did something for white people 6 million Jews died.

you don't seem to understand what the world "particularly" means.
i'lll simplify it for you, ethnic nationalism is retarded but its even more retarded when the ethnicity in question don't have the legitimacy of the land (not native)

You don't have to believe in racialism, buddy.

But I'll pic my genetics textbooks for Medical College if you believe in "science".

But then you'll probably deny it with: MUH CAPITALIST AGENDA.

Nature prevails. No level of "belief" will make racialism less true.

You would if you lived to see the islamic future of Europe. Such a waste. How can leftists ignore the fucking regressive nature of Islam as a threat?

Yes, I'd like you to show me the part in your genetics textbook where it says black people are inferior :^).

Islam is retarded but ethnic nationalism is equally retarded. One can dislike both at the same time.

My dude, anuddah shoah is porky's plan, who popularized communism, socialism and class struggle ? whites, who made the workers so damn resilient ? whites, i don't know if you noticed but, immigrants are often okay with being underpaid.
also mass immigration would bring the cultural imperialism that Islam bears.

So you choose not to take a side. How very high-minded of you. I'm sure that will make all the difference as the brown masses vote for Sharia law.

I never said black people are inferior. That's not what our textbooks said.

But when fucktards like you trot along and start promoting mixed races, we need to invent new fucking solvents to make up for a differentiation of metabolism and bloodpressure in new bastardized races, and this you make it harder for us to save people.

Keep races pure and simple, and there won't be any genetic disrepnencies.

If you don't care about indigenous Europeans becoming a minority in their homeland, then i'm assuming you don't care about the current situation of the native Americans, the Aborigines or the Maoris either, right? Because native Europeans will end up just like them. They're just a few decades behind.

Let knobheads be knobheads m8.

A good move, but a better move would be banning muzzies altogether.

They can go back to the Middle east and wear their burkini there. Not my fucking problem.

I was joking.

I side with communism and choose to Gulag you both.

I wonder why the classification was dropped from anthropology……

Sorry, you can' stop miscegenation, people will fuck each other if they want to. Now go out there, fuck a white girl and stop complaining.

The destruction of the native Americans was largely caused by disease. I don't think ISIS has the means for biological warfare friend. If you honestly think the flood of refugees is going to eliminate the "European race" in a few centuries you're literally retarded.

Don't you have some Jewish children to do medical experiments on?

France is an odd and not so politically homogenous country.
they're either far left or far right.

they also made the huge mistake of importing millions of low skilled workers from their former colonies for the sake of free market and economy.
this worked but they ignored the social side, these workers had a cultural baggage.
they told them that that baggage was acceptable because France is about Liberté, égalité, Fraternité.
+30 year later these workers and their kids realize that it was a lie.
"liberté" doesn't apply to them, their cultural baggage isn't welcome.
as for égalité and Fratérnité that just never happened.

Well it wasn't dropped here in Slavlands. Nor will it be dropped. Certain races require certain ointments for the ailments. Denying that is denying vanilla evolution, and for that I can only say: good job, how's Bible club going for ya?

And before you claim MUH ERISTICAL DIALECTICS - I didn't come here to honourably debate the truth. I will die for the truth or die trying, and you will be beneath my boots the day of the rope comes.

Slava rodu.

Ah, the realistic choice. You think it's gonna happen over the next hundred years? Cause that's your window. Well that or Islamic Gommunism

The flood of refugees will not physically eliminate the European race by force. But this present level of non-white immigration WILL result in the natives being outnumbered by non-natives and their offspring in about 2 or 3 generations. Right now there is only ONE country in Europe that is over 95% white.

Also, history shows that whenever multiple races are occupying the same living space, miscegenation will inevitably occur. Legislation alone is not enough to stop races from mixing. There has to be total physical separation of the races in order to prevent miscegenation.

If you can't prevent miscegenation, you have a situation like the one in South America today, where the Spanish and Portuguese colonists raped the native American women to produce mestizos, who will never be genetically pure native Americans again.

when will stormweenies ever stop ?.

We will stop when you start listening to facts and drop the double standards.

the epitome of retardation.
its like a black KKK

what fact ?

I'm fine with 2% of the population not being white. But that's not what's happening. European countries are becoming majority non-white, as in over 51% of the total population will not be indigenous. And this will happen not in the distant future, but in only a few generations.

You have to account for the fact that Europe has sub-replacement fertility and very old populations. In the UK which is only 87% white, only 65% of babies born are white. There are dozens of schools in Britain with no indigenous children and where none of the children speak English. And that trend is getting worse every year.

I don't want 100% racial homogeneity. But I would like for European countries to stay at least 90-95% white. Just like how Japan is 98% native Japanese, and South Korea is 96% native Korean.

also

Open any advanced genetics book.

It was dropped because the differences between races genetically are so small the classification doesn't accurately represent human biological diversity.
source.wustl.edu/2003/05/evolutionary-biologist-race-in-humans-a-social-not-biological-concept/

I don't care about your fee fees Nazi. I'm glad to have more dead Nazi's.

No, I live in Canada and the Muslims here are mostly chill. Most of them come from Iran and I have yet to hear any of them espousing anti-western dogma.

Yep.
I know that's why you're autistic.
Full automated luxury autism?

Again, I asked when you think ISIS is going to start engaging in biological warfare. If they aren't, having a population that is 5% more non-white than it is white in 50 years isn't going to put you on the same level as the Native Americans

Okay I was worried.

Yeah Hitler let Jews serve in the military to. That didn't stop him from slaughtering poles.

Alright, so Freshman, we've got that settled.

Last I checked some dude threatened to kill me for not converting to Islam in my own town, I just passed by him, so they don't particularly scare me, nor do I give two craps about them.

What's with all these boogeymen?
Are you projecting perhaps?

Do you have a problem with 98.5% of Japan's population being indigenous Japanese people? Do you think that's a good thing or a bad thing? Don't you think the natives of European countries should make up 98% of their population, too?

The difference is that even though Japan and European countries BOTH have aging populations, sub-replacement fertility, and stagnant economies, Japan has no immigration.

Which means that even though Japan's population is expected to drop from it's present level of 130 million to around 80-90 million by 2050, by which time about 25-30% of the population will be over 65 years old, demographically the country will still retain it's Japanese character and ethnicity.

This is not the same situation that Europe is experiencing. Unlike Japan, as the aging white natives die off without reproducing, tens of millions of Africans and Arabs are pouring into Europe to fill the gaps they leave in the population.

Hitler was very open about the fact he thought slavs were subhumans. He thought those that had lived in Germany for years could be spared but the ones in Slavic countries were subhumans who let themselves be ruled over by the Jews because they were untermench

So yes, a nigger KKK.

That wasn't my point. I was saying that comparing the refugee crisis to biological genocide done unto the native americans is a juxtaposition.

I was pointing out that just because Hitler let Slavs serve did not mean he thought they were humans.

[citation needed]
oh noe, white people aren't having kids.
its brownies fault, Nazi masturbation fantasy NOW.
these brown people are literally working for the white elderly, thats what the whole immigration is about you stupid uneducated fuck tard.

why ? because muh feels of course.

good job, i'm sure your country and race is proud of you
already did, can't find anything to back up your opinion.

omg noooooooooooo

Dubs checked, Kek seems to want me to continue talking to you.

So you've read Mein Kampf? I doubt it.

You've read Mein Kampf too?!
Nice.

No, you didn't read advanced genetics, buddy. Check even with fucking basic anatomy. Hell, what I've heard from colleagues in other branches is there's also racial variations for dental anatomy and gnatology.

You will never stop making me mad with how you blatantly deny the truth even though it's right before you. You like science, but when science proves that racial purity is important, you just kinda… shimmie away like the snakes you are.

No.
It's not of particular importance to me.

Japan is about to go full blown fascism anyway, not exactly the place I'd wanna be even if I was Japanese.

Yeah I know Hitler really loved Slavs
(pic related: the Nazi's even set up swingsets when they went through Eastern Europe)

Rolled 113 (1d1024)

Care to give a source for that?

The men and women you see hanging are either partisan scum, prostitutes, or have helped the resistance - or simply don't like our culture.

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm?

Only a few countries in Europe record racial statistics. But i'll use the UK as an example.

In the 1991 census the UK was 93% white.

In the 2001 census the UK was 90% white.

In the 2011 census the UK was 87% white.

Source: ethnicity.ac.uk/medialibrary/briefings/dynamicsofdiversity/how-has-ethnic-diversity-grown-1991-2001-2011.pdf

The trends show that every year, and every decade, the total percentage of the population that is white, or indigenous white British, is decreasing.

If immigration and birth trends continue as they are now, the UK *WILL* become a majority non-white country. And it will most likely happen without our lifetimes.

This is not true. Even in European countries where the fertility rate IS above replacement level, such as Ireland and Iceland, these countries are STILL taking in thousands of non-white immigrants every year.

Also, in European countries like Poland, where they have sub-replacement fertility and no immigration whatsoever, their economy is one of the best performing of any EU member state, growing an average of 6-7% per year and being the only EU country to not go into recession in 2008. This is all with a fertility rate of only 1.3 children per woman.

So all of the supposed economic justifications for non-white immigration fall apart with just a bit of research. The only true purpose of non-white immigration is to make indigenous Europeans a minority in their own ancestral homelands.

Yes, the 12 million non-combatants the Nazi's killed were all communist :^).

ftfy

stormweenies consider Mein Kampf a scientific book ?
that explains allot then

btw: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Slavic_sentiment

thanks, it made my day.
your stormweenie opinion isn't the "truth"

I'm not a capitalist.

No, I'm asking because I've never personally touched it.

Opinions are opinions - Darwinism isn't classed as an Opinion. So you probably made Marx and Darwin mad too.

Yeah, the Nazi's killed 12 million innocent people. Total count for the Axis is 27 million(in 5 years lol) while the Allies don't even break 1 million.

Tell me who the bad guys are again?

economicshelp.org/blog/6399/economics/impact-of-immigration-on-uk-economy/

not surprised, its the usual stormweenie argument

Nice trips

If we keep mounting up the numbers set by the capitalist elite, we will have to add those upwards of 150 million dead under reds so I suggest you stop with the numbers, because I can hit back with even bigger ones, my family being the vicitm of the red scourge themselves back when the reds were "liberating" Europe.

Both my grandfathers ended up in the labour camp, and when they returned to their land, it was confiscated by the reds, all their valuables were stolen by the reds in front of their eyes. They had land for personal use, with no labor force other than their own hands.

I've read the Communist Manifest, and Das Kapital, then reread the CM 5 years ago - nowhere did it say that such an action was supported or would be supported. Your own "heroes" are your own greatest ideological enemies and you keep denying it.

If there's ever going to be a revolution, it will be the picrelated flag leading the charge.

Poland has no immigration and sub-replacement fertility. They actually have more emigration. But their economy is performing very well. How do you explain that?

And if there must be immigration, why does it have to be non-white immigration? Why doesn't the UK import other white Europeans?

so 89% white is now considered majority non-white.
must be stormlard math.
at this rate UK will be a majority non white by 2200

Some people say it will happen by around 2060 or 2066. But the important thing isn't when it will happen. The important thing is that it WILL happen, if nothing changes. And I don't want it ever to happen, even if I won't live to see it.

Maybe you'd do well to look beyond your borders and listen to the countries where the issue is more immediate?

This. When faced with the issue leftists invariably say one of the following

Blind optimism that means they don't have to consider the possibility.

Who reduce it all to skin-colour, ignoring the cultural aspects that are the true cause for concern.

Does left/pol/ honestly see no issue with western countries becoming majority muslim?

stop right there, first Poland is a 3rd world country.
a guy who earns 2$ while he used to earn $1 is an improvement of 100%, but he's still a poor fuck.
just like China, Poland underperformed.
Poland gets the most gibs from Europe.

its not hard improving your inexistent economy when the neighbors give you billions of shekels for free.

if i give millions to a homeless guy he'd become a millionaire. this obviously doesn't mean that the homeless guy has grate economical skills

The things is, even if their birth rates fall, there are still more and more non-white immigrants pouring in every year. So their numbers still increase, and will continue to increase, unless non-white immigration is stopped completely.

Take America for example. The number of Asians in America is increasing every year, even though Asians have lower birth rates than white people (1.6 to 1.8 for whites). Why are they increasing? Because one third of legal immigrants to America are Asian.

I don't care about the economy. I would rather be dirt poor and live in a racially homogeneous white country than be rich and a minority in my own indigenous ancestral homeland.

Word, brother.

true, but it doesn't help your cause either

see

see

probably because other European countries are on the same boat demographically speaking.
also, 3rd worlders are cheaper

That's why i'm not a capitalist.

interesting, but that decision isn't up to you. and your leaders have chosen another option.

Then our leaders must be removed from office by any means necessary.

What are they, Islamic extremists?

Okay, let's have a look at your source step by step.

No problem there, a lot of migrants do flow into the UK, as do people flow out of it.

So, 260,000 a year. Okay. Where are these people coming from?

So, India, China, and Pakistan. Let's have a look at the typical citizen of those countries.

We'll start with India.

India is the seventh largest country in the world, with a 2011 population of roughly 1.2 billion people. The population density is around 388 people per square kilometer, ranking 31st with other countries.

The PPP rated GDP of India is 8.7 trillion, or $6,664 USD per person (so 3rd in world GDP, 141st in PPP rated GDP per capita).

The HDI of India rated in 2014 was 0.609, or 130th in the world.

Indian education isn't the best, but still quite good considering the circumstances. Free and Compulsory education is treated as a right from the age of 6 to 14, and private schools do exist with 29% of 6-14 y/o students being educated in them.

In 2012, 96.5% of all rural children (6-14) were enrolled in education. Total literacy is 74%, with 82.2% literacy for males and 65.5% literacy for females.

69% of people go onto secondary education, and 25% of people go on to tertiary education. 40% of people obtain a secondary diploma (AKA high school diploma) with 7% obtaining a post secondary diploma.

Considering that most poor uneducated people in India would find it hard (if not impossible) to emigrate to the UK, we can make an assumption that most Indian expats in the UK would have at least a secondary education. As thus, they can contribute to the country in a way that is not cheap labour.

China is quite similar. 1.339 billion people in 2013, population density of 145 people per square kilometer.

PPP rated GDP is 20 trillion dollars (aka the world's largest economy), with a GDP per capita of 15,095 USD, which is 83rd in the world.

HDI is 0.727, or 90th in the world.

Chinese education is mandatory from 6 to 15 years of age, and optional for students of 16-18 years of age. Literacy is 96.7%, with 98.2% for males and 94.5% for females.

121 million children are enrolled in primary education, 78.4 million are enrolled in secondary education.

A 99% attendance rate for primary school and a 80% rate for both primary and middle school has been reported by the Chinese government.

China has over 20 million students enrolled in higher education. In 2010, the Chinese government expected 6 million students to graduate, with 63% likely to enter the work force.

Again, as with India, we can expect the average Chinese immigrant to be at least somewhat educated. They will be able to help with the work force in a way that is not dumb labour.

Pakistan is quite similar to the previous two countries with a few differences.

Population of 202 million, density of 260 per square kilometer. GDP(PPP) of 984 billion (26th) with a GDP(PPP) per capita of $5,084 USD.

HDI of 0.538, which is 147th.

The state is required to give free and mandatory education to students from 3 to 16 years of age. Literacy ranges from 96% to 28% depending on the area. Pakistan produces 445,000 university graduates per year. However, it has an astonishing out of school rate of 5.1 million children.

So. Compare this to Syria. Does your source compare in any way to the influx of refugees, or does it compare to people coming to the UK for a better life from somewhat built up countries (ones NOT being bombed and under constant turmoil that is)?

I don't care. They're not white.

because you don't like non white.

its better when you don't try to hide behind ridiculous arguments that don't hold for more than few seconds outside of Holla Forums.
just be honest with yourself, and say loud and clear.

coming out of the closet is always a relief

the irony is almost amusing.

Every non-white that moves into Europe, legally or illegally, is contributing to the territorial displacement and eventual dispossession of the indigenous population.

I think the main difference here is that Japan is much more homogeneously minded than western countries. The west tends to value individual freedom and asia tends to value good of the community. Japan has always had a very isolationist "get off my lawn" value that the world just kind of accepts while western countries are becoming increasingly globalist. The west has also intervened heavily in the middle east and africa, hell a good 1/3 of african countries have french speaking communities. Japan hasn't messed with them so they don't have a guilt complex over it.

Japan is also physically much more isolated than europe: Europe, northern africa, and the near and middle east have been cross pollinating people and technology for thousands of years. The smooth gradient of people ("races") from africa to sweden is proof of that. It makes sense that when europe became so much richer so faster than everywhere else they'd naturally want to move in and get a slice of the pie. It's a lot harder for anyone in asia to sail to Japan and integrate given their physical, cultural, and political isolation.

Because maybe they have no incentive to move to the UK since their country is just as good? Of course africans and middle easterns want to move to the UK, it's a rich country with lots of welfare. Why would Poles or Swedes move there en masse as opposed to living in their own countries?

That's a big spook user. Why the fuck do you care were you ancestors were born and lived their shitty worthless lives? Also what do you consider "ancestral"? 100 years? 500? 1000? 1 million? I could count about a dozen places ranging from Louisiana to the fertile crescent as my "ancestral homeland" depending on how many generations I go back, and most of those places suck ass and I wouldn't want to live there anyways.

Do you want Europe to become majority non-white?

Yes or no?

the question is, why should anyone care ?. why should i care that some fag living in X place has pink nipples or not ?

also, this is pointless, through human history, cultures and civilizations were in permanent change.
you can't stop what is inevitable.

as for the "white race" they aren't a unique snowflake that dropped from space.
anyone living in Europe long enough will ultimately have his offspring turning "white", not talking about irrelevant shiting or anything

i said "RAC3 M1XING" not "irrelevant shitting"

Japan also genocided the native ainu and doesn't get any shit for it.

define "white" faggot

that too

Fuck it, i'm converting to Judaism and moving to Israel. There's no diversity in Tel Aviv.

lel
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Israel

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tel_Aviv_District

i have to admit tho, i have a hard time distinguishing an Israeli jew from an Arab.
unless they're some nordic/slav Ashkenazis fresh off the boat, native jew and arab look identical

Doesn't matter. Jews are the only other race that somewhat looks like white people, and since every single country in Europe will be majority non-white in a few generations, Israel is my only option to escape from non-white subhumans. Unless a European country permanently bans non-white immigration and deports all non-whites there's nowhere else for me to go.

You still haven't explained why non-white is bad.

I can't. I just have an irrational hatred for non-white and/or dark-skinned people, so I don't want to be around them. Unfortunately, the governments of white countries force me against my will to share my country with people who I hate. So Israel is the only option now.

see, dorsn't it feel better now ?

...

What do you have against me hating non-whites? I don't want to DO anything to non-whites. I just want them to stay away from me. Can't I just have ONE place on Earth to escape from them? I can't even escape them in Europe anymore.

People like being around their own.

You can't see beyond your materialism.

some of us have ascended beyond primitive tribal behaviors

you're 100% free to decide who you want to live with. i approve.
however you're not free to decide where others chose to live

...

Tip harder faggot.

You can hate whoever you want to, but it's not our problem.

theguardian.com/uk/2000/sep/03/race.world

Once every single country in Europe and the West is majority non-white, where can I go to avoid being in the physical presence of non-whites? (Excluding Israel of course)

So I should let scum leech off my society, and in greater numbers, destroy my way of life.

I hate retarded materialists like you, I rest easy knowing the fact there never will be another communist revolution anywhere, ever.

mfw there are communist revolutions going on right now but the Nazi masturbation fantasy is nowhere to be seen

"Whites" did nothing, people did, and currently through the violent exploitation of the third world, without which it would be utterly fucked.

You're a shitposter on an anime imageboard, you're no less of a lumpen than some economic migrant.

Cry more, faggot.

??????

East Asian leftism has always been a joke.

The founder of the EU, Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi, wrote in his book Practical Idealism that the goal of the European Union is to physically exterminate the white race.

haha ebin

The populist right is rising fast, Trump, Brexit, multiple far-right parties gaining traction around the world.

Trotting out the same argument I see, europeans didn't even start the colonialism of Africa until this millennia.

How do you explain the early Europeans creating tools ect.

Not an argument.

You are the one who is crying, the right has actual solutions, not just "muh econmeee faggots" "muh workers wrights".

Marksoc are wonderful.

"but he was a capitalist meanie though"

Go back to your poison filled dreams, fuck-head.

1953, best year of my life.

leftleave.org/

Trump is just another Zionist American conservative and, contrary to Guardian butthurting, Brexit wasn't entirely an appeal to racism.

You mean literally no white nationalist ever?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scramble_for_Africa

Really? This is not a discussion of anthropology. I can assure you that none of it reinforces your victim complex ideology.

Not an argument.

I'm sure all world problems will magically solve themselves if we just kill all the shitskins. Facts and reason are Jewish propaganda.

H-HE'S A ZIONIST THO!

Yeah pretty much

>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scramble_for_Africa

It is an appeal against increasing globalism and the global elite manipulation. Funny, that someone so concerned with workers rights, the American worker (or any western country worker) getting their job replaced by a foreign one, (with lower pay, another fault of the capitalists).

It is an discussion about that despite Africa being resource-laden, the natives did not develop the same or better than the Europeans did.

Anyway, since you didn't bother ACTUALLY studying Holla Forums ideology, just proclaiming "muh genocide lel" it is clear you have no idea what you are talking about.

>unitedwithisrael.org/watch-how-trump-reacts-to-nasty-remark-about-zionist-israel/

He follows the same American right platform: radical Islam exists, so Israel can do literally no wrong, ever.

You won't find any like-minded peers here, then. Feel free to bawl about how the god emperor will send us to the gas chambers though.

Yes, and this millennium was over in 2000. Or do you not know how calendars work?
Regardless, the fact that it's relatively recent only reinforces my point: it's still highly relevant. The country exports far, far more wealth than it takes in.

He IS the global elite. You are constructing a narrative you want to believe.

Porky will just destroy the economy out of spite if he cannot get his unskilled labor. Thus, if you want to end mass immigration, which has real problems unrelated to your fear of browns, you need to end capitalism first.

Because most of the resources are useless to an undeveloped nation. That there was no tools or agriculture is a ridiculous assumption perpetrated by Western charities.

I'm talking about the actual end result, assuming the alt right aren't just going to end up as GOP useful idiots. Holla Forums is too stupid and bitter to know what it wants.

In the context of Africa being colonized I was referring to the reference plane of 1000AD-2000AD.

Yet gets attacked by every media outlet owned by them, funny that.

He is an Overton window shiftier, the starting point, not the finishing line.

I already understand that, I'm a Useful Idiotist.

You use resources to develop. The Europeans had far less than the Africans did and managed to turn out pretty good, I'd say. The Egyptians, Asians, and Arabic countries did too.

Yet they never achieved technological parity with their international counterparts.

Technology is the measure of a great society.

I'd prefer deportations to genocide.

To add to that, word filters are the sign of a weak forum.

Looks like more Jim Crow shit, iirc they b& facial coverings too

yeah this breddy mush

jej

iirc they had to get a model who'd done softcore porn to model the first bikini because everybody else was too modest to wear it.

pic related

If they wanted him gone, they would just pretend he doesn't exist.

Believe this if you want, but almost everyone in the US would be horrified by a straight up alt right platform.

Have fun getting your skull ventilated by occult fetishists when your usefulness has worn out.

Europe was also mudhut land until the Romans conquered half of it. Africa also had full-fledged kingdoms that traded with other continents.

If you're trying to convince me of your racial beliefs, I've heard it a thousand times. I don't care. See pic.

If you think this won't end in violence, you are beyond naive.

Getting salty over them is literally the only reason we have them.

WE WUZ KANGZ

That's not what that maymay means, you retard, it refers to the Black Egyptian Hypothesis. Sub-Saharan African empires were absolutely a thing.

damn kikes !

More like you get triggered over them. Word filters coddle and protect the weak from arguments, considering this is an leftist forum, I'm not surprised.

No. The rise of Trump disproves this, alot of liberal faggots would be salty though.

Still, I like my own people and wish to have an homogeneous society.

False, they still didn't acvieve technologcial parity, they made primitive tools yes, but still lagged behind everyone else.

This is universally accepted as a measure of an society.

It has happened before, jews kicked out of countries ect, and besides, if something like this were to happen, most of the public would already be on our side.

*Balaclava

ayy, I bought something vaguely similar to that off a Nigerian immigrant at a flea market in NYC.

mmhmm
porky keeps dividing people along racial lines by importing everyone everywhere
how could a bunch of divided people ever stand up against the banks when they are too busy fighting ethnic battles?

...