williamengdahl.com
By F. William Engdahl
25 November 2016
The Dangerous Deception Called The Trump Presidency
Nathaniel Morris
Other urls found in this thread:
warhammer40k.wikia.com
imgdurr.com
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
positivemoney.org
positivemoney.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
warhammer40k.wikia.com
twitter.com
Noah Morgan
The project called the Trump Presidency has just two months before its formal beginning. Yet already the hopes and fantasies of much of the world are making him into something and someone Donald Trump most definitely is not. Donald Trump is yet another project of the same boring old patriarchs who try again and again to create a one world order that they control absolutely, a New World Order that one close Trump backer once referred to as universal fascism. Ignore the sometimes fine rhetoric in some of his speeches. Talk is cheap. If we consider rather the agenda that’s taking form even in these very early days of cabinet naming, we can see that Donald Trump is the same agenda of war and global empire as Obama, as Bush before him, as Bill Clinton and Clinton’s “tutor”, George H.W. Bush before him. There is no good side to what the world is about to experience with President Trump
‘Ladies and gentlemen, It’s Showtime!’ Today we give you Donald Trump. He will tell you just what many of you want to hear. Trump the showman will tell you he will make America great again; Trump will say he will ship at least 3 million illegals back across the Rio Grande; Trump will introduce a bill to declare the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist organization; Trump will bring jobs back to America from China and other low wage countries; Trump will sit down with Putin and work out some kind of a deal to calm things down; Trump will scrap the Iran nuclear deal of Obama…
Often during this election campaign, which was more a Hollywood “D” grade movie than any honest debate of policies and ideas candidate Trump made statements that resonated with the “silent majority” of not only so-called blue collar workers, but also the disenfranchised middle class whose earnings have been declining in real terms since the 1970’s. Trump, like an earlier actor-President named Ronald Reagan, has a talent to make himself sound sincere.
Is Trump a Grassroots Revolution?
We should not imagine for one second that the Patriarchy– those loveless old men like David Rockefeller or George Herbert Walker Bush or unnamed others– were so overwhelmed by the political genius of candidate Trump emerging from every scandal more powerful than before, that they were surprised, out-foxed, and just groaned and let it happen.
The Trump Presidency has been planned in minute detail by them and their think tanks. Quite simply, had they continued the policies that Hillary Clinton represented–war and confrontation against Russia, against China, with Color Revolution destabilizations of any and all political leaders who opposed them whether Ghaddafi or Mubarak or even Putin–they saw they were losing power over huge parts of the world, essential geopolitical power.
When a President of the relatively tiny American former colony fears not to openly attack by name an American President as “son of a whore,” and declare in China his Philippines’ “separation” from the United States, when one country after the other comes closer in economic and political cooperation to Russia, to China and to their growing Eurasian economic cohesion around the One Bridge One Road Eurasian infrastructure great project, it was clearly time to install a Plan B President.
That Plan B is casino mogul Donald Trump, a political tabula rasa, a power-possessed person with a blackmail potential that will keep him on program for them, an alpha male who is quite gifted at being able to make people fear.
Nathaniel Butler
If we were to use conventional psychological definitions I would say the word sociopath fits: “Antisocial personality disorder characterized by a lack of regard for the moral or legal standards in the culture.” Narcissism would be another apt term: “Extreme selfishness, with a grandiose view of one’s own talents and a craving for admiration…” Read his own autobiography and his descriptions of his earlier antics with mob lawyer and mentor, Roy Cohn, at the cocaine-snorting Studio 54 and look more closely at his actual life history, not only what he dismisses as “locker room talk” eleven years ago with Billy Bush. He is definitely no JFK or Charles de Gaulle, not even close.
I state clearly my conviction, and please recall this as Trump Presidency policies unfold after January 20, 2017 to see if I am correct or not: Donald Trump was put into office to prepare America for war, a war the banks of Wall Street and the US military industrial complex are not presently in a position economically or industrially or otherwise, geopolitically, to win. His job will be to reposition the United States for them to reverse the trend to disintegration of American global hegemony, to, as the Dick Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz Project for the New American Century put it in their September, 2000 report, “rebuild America’s defenses.”
To do that preparation, a deception strategy that will fatally weaken the developing deep bonds between Russia and China will be priority. It’s already begun. We have a friendly phone call from The Donald to Vladimir the Fearsome in Moscow. Russian media is euphoric about a new era in US-Russia relations after Obama. Then suddenly we hear the war-mongering NATO head, Stoltenberg, suddenly purr soothing words to Russia. Float the idea that California Congressman and Putin acquaintance, Dana Rohrabacher, is leaked as a possible Secretary of State. It’s classic Kissinger Balance of Power geopolitics–seem to ally with the weaker of two mortal enemies, Russia, to isolate the stronger, China. Presumably Vladimir Putin is not so naïve or stupid as to fall for it, but that is the plot of Trump’s handlers. Such a strategy of preventing the growing Russia-China cooperation was urged by Zbigniew Brzezinski in a statement this past summer.
Because he’s been selected (and not by us dear voters) to play a definite role–to shift tactics of global domination according to the basics of the 1992 Bush-Wolfowitz Doctrine–preempting any nation or group of nations in Eurasia from challenging American Sole Superpower hegemony–the selection of his Cabinet and key policy advisers, is vital. Here we can already see the outlines of the cast of characters who have been chosen to fill out the theater play called Trump Presidency, and the emerging new plot for reconfiguring the Sole Superpower strategy.
Julian Hill
The Dramatis Personae
As of this writing, several key positions have been named. It includes three-star General Mike Flynn to be the President’s National Security Advisor; it includes Congressman Mike Pompeo of Kansas to be Director of Central Intelligence; it includes Jeff Sessions to be US Attorney General and it includes Stephen K. Bannon in a newly-created post as White House “Chief Strategist” and Senior Counsellor to the President.
In this article I’ll look closely at Mike Flynn, the former 3-star general who will be the all-important Trump National Security Advisor, sitting in the White House. Normally perceptive bloggers and analysts have greeted the Flynn appointment with cheers of joy. They cite his opposition to US covert support for ISIS and Islamic terrorist groups such as Al Qaeda’s Al Nusra; he is on record that the 2003 Iraq invasion was a “strategic mistake.” Moreover, Flynn is opposed to stirring up war with Russia and instead calls for waging war against ISIS and other radical terrorist organizations. In fact Obama fired Flynn as head of the Defense Intelligence Agency when Flynn opposed the Obama decision to prioritize the anti-Russia war over the anti-Jihad war, and called for cooperation with Syrian President Assad to that end.
Flynn’s position on war against ISIS and presumably also against the Muslim Brotherhood so beloved by Hillary Clinton and the Obama Administration, is not one of a man of peace. Rather it is one of a cold, calculating military professional, a military professional who favors working with the Likud of Netanyahu to advance the global agenda of war.
Flynn’s statements on Assad and ISIS and Iraq must be interpreted not in a vacuum but in light of a military intelligence specialist who sees that the decades-long CIA and Pentagon policy of training Muslim Brotherhood and other fanatic Muslim-origin terrorists to wage surrogate wars of empire have backfired badly. Not only the CIA’s July 15 failed coup using networks of Turkey’s Fethullah Gülen, but rather every CIA-backed Jihad war from Secretary of State Clinton’s war against Mubarak, against Gaddafi, against most of the Islamic world to try to impose US-backed Muslim Brotherhood terror regimes loyal to Washington, has failed. The gross effect has been to drive much of the world away from Washington and their constant proxy wars.
An intelligent military strategist would say it’s time for another plan. This is what Flynn is about. He will advance a shift in Washington policy away from using Muslim Brotherhood and allied terror organizations towards more intimate restoration of full cooperation with Israel’s right-wing Netanyahu Likud government.
Walid Phares, Donald Trump’s adviser on terrorism, and Middle Eastern Affairs, told Egyptian media in comments reported by Ben Shapiro’s conservative US blog, The Daily Wire, that Donald Trump will back efforts to outlaw the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization, something the Obama Administration vehemently refused and prevented Congress from doing.
Anyone familiar with my latest book, The Lost Hegemon: Whom the gods would destroy, will know I am in no way a friend of the Muslim Brotherhood who have been in a dark alliance with the CIA since the 1950s. Yet reality is not simplistic as in, “my enemy’s enemy is my friend…” Walid Phares, Donald Trump’s key adviser on terrorism and the Middle East, is also a Senior Fellow of a small very pro-Netanyahu think tank called the Foundation for Defense of Democracies.
Isaac Butler
Foundation for Defense of Democracies?
The Washington-based Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, was created in the wake of September 11, 2001 by a former Republican National Committee communications director, Clifford May, in order to, as it declares on its website, “promote pluralism, defend democratic values, and fight the ideologies that drive terrorism.”
The notable point about the FDD, whose Senior Fellow, Walid Phares is guiding President-elect Trump on the Middle East and terrorism, is the money trail behind it. It was founded and financed by a group of US billionaires closely tied to Benjamin Netanyahu and his Israeli geopolitical agenda. The donors include the notorious Sheldon Adelson, Las Vegas and Macau gambling casino mogul who according to the Israeli press gave the Trump campaign $25 million in the closing critical days. Other FDD financial backers include Jewish American with a long history of funding pro-Israel organizations: Bernard Marcus, co-founder of Home Depot; whiskey heirs Samuel and Edgar Bronfman; Wall Street billionaire speculators Michael Steinhardt and Paul Singer, and Leonard Abramson, founder of US Healthcare.
No surprise then that the main Washington think tank called on to testify against the Obama agenda of coming to a nuclear deal with Iran and lifting sanctions was the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, who testified 17 times against the Iran plan. FDD’s executive director, Mark Dubowitz, even helped design the sanctions regime on Iran and its oil sales that was put in place in 2010.
In addition, most other positions of the FDD echo those of the Netanyahu regime in Tel Aviv. Toby Dershowitz, who spent 14 years as AIPAC’s communications head, is the FDD vice president for government relations and strategy. AIPAC, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, was described by John Mearsheimer, University of Chicago professor, as “an agent of the Israeli government with a stranglehold on the United States Congress with its power and influence.” Trump was a featured speaker at the March 2016 AIPAC annual meeting.
James Gutierrez
Mike Flynn and Mike Ledeen
Now we return to the anti-Muslim Brotherhood National Security Advisor, Mike Flynn. Flynn, along with CIA director-designate Mike Pompeo, agrees that the Obama Iran nuclear deal should be scrapped and calls Iran a state sponsor of terrorism, a position dear to Netanyahu’s heart.
Flynn also wrote a book together with Michael Ledeen. One doesn’t co-author a book with just anyone. I know. It has to be one whose thoughts are in full harmony with yours. Michael Ledeen is today a Freedom Scholar at, now isn’t this interesting: the Foundation for Defense of Democracies. Worth noting, financial investor, Jim Rickards, also is on the Board of Advisors of the Center on Sanctions and Illicit Finance at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, and former CIA Director James Woolsey, rumored being considered for a top post with the Trump project, is one of four members of the FDD Leadership Council.
This year, 2016, Ledeen co-authored a book with NSC Director-designate Mike Flynn titled, Field of Fight: How to Win the War Against Radical Islam and its Allies. The ties between Ledeen and Trump NSC director are clearly not casual.
Years ago Ledeen–who was implicated in the illegal Iran-Contra arm for cocaine dealings of G.H.W. Bush and his CIA Old Boys network during the Reagan years — wrote a doctoral dissertation which I once saw, today almost impossible to find. It was titled “Universal Fascism,” and dealt with the applicability of Italian fascism of Mussolini to a global model, a fascist one world order if you will.
Michael Ledeen, who prefers to be in the background, is perhaps best characterized as a Godfather of the neoconservatives. He has shaped the policies of the likes of Paul Wolfowitz, Dick Cheney, Don Rumsfeld and others of the US war faction.
In 2003 just as the Bush-Cheney-Wolfowitz war on Iraq was underway, Ledeen gave a speech titled, “Time to Focus on Iran — The Mother of Modern Terrorism,” for the pro-Netanyahu Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA) in which he declared, “the time for diplomacy is at an end; it is time for a free Iran, free Syria and free Lebanon.” To “free” Iran, Syria and Lebanon back in 2003, almost a decade before the US war against Assad, Ledeen declared that Iraq, Iran and Syria should get their “freedom” through a US-led “total War.”
According to reports of those near the cabinet selection process of president-elect Donald Trump, two people have decisive influence on who is being selected—Trump’s 35-year-old politically inexperienced son-in-law, Jared Kushner, and Mike Flynn. Trump has even asked those two to sit in with him on those highly classified Presidential briefings.
Winston Churchill once said, “In wartime, truth is so precious that she should always be attended by a bodyguard of lies.” It is already clear that the project of the Trump Presidency, to prepare America for a new war, is already being well attended by a bodyguard of lies.
Angel Taylor
...
Tyler Walker
awesome response I would expect nothing less
John Cooper
...
Joseph Wood
kek has praised this post
Jackson Ross
...
Ryder Long
Is your bot broken
Andrew Wood
...
Ian Howard
Seriously did you just read the title or what? Hilary is irrelevent trumps presidency is all part of the plan to divide russia from china and keep the status
Dylan Wood
...
Easton Lopez
...
Zachary Wood
Thats not an argument lad
Isaiah Clark
Maybe if you put your head in the sand reality will go away
Levi Allen
...
Joshua Johnson
No one cares what the kikelover said.
Adrian Foster
Im somewhat torn on believing you guys are real shills or reddit fags
Juan Hernandez
It wasnt a posative quote in this context. You should read the whole post
Oliver Brown
rule of thumb, read the title, opening phrase(s), and the last phrase(s)/conclusion.
so no, I don't need to read it all to know its baloney, clickbait title, buzzwords from the get-go muh patriarchy, muh facism, and he's the same as all the ones before him (that's a laugh). An appeal to emotion conclusion resting on a famous person quote that barely has anything to do with the Trump phenomenon, I have a better one for you to understand Trump.
-Ann Coulter
Mason Sanchez
You should read it all because you didnt get the point at all
Jacob Myers
Yep, the piece is meant to influence the reader. The entire article is assumption and speculation. The writer used his clairvoyance to divine the truth from the ether. We should all be thankful he is using his powers for good.
Asher Rodriguez
Which parts are speculation? He refrences names people and clear political strategy several times
Eli Lewis
If you were only going to read a section it should have been this one
I state clearly my conviction, and please recall this as Trump Presidency policies unfold after January 20, 2017 to see if I am correct or not: Donald Trump was put into office to prepare America for war, a war the banks of Wall Street and the US military industrial complex are not presently in a position economically or industrially or otherwise, geopolitically, to win. His job will be to reposition the United States for them to reverse the trend to disintegration of American global hegemony, to, as the Dick Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz Project for the New American Century put it in their September, 2000 report, “rebuild America’s defenses.”
To do that preparation, a deception strategy that will fatally weaken the developing deep bonds between Russia and China will be priority. It’s already begun. We have a friendly phone call from The Donald to Vladimir the Fearsome in Moscow. Russian media is euphoric about a new era in US-Russia relations after Obama. Then suddenly we hear the war-mongering NATO head, Stoltenberg, suddenly purr soothing words to Russia. Float the idea that California Congressman and Putin acquaintance, Dana Rohrabacher, is leaked as a possible Secretary of State. It’s classic Kissinger Balance of Power geopolitics–seem to ally with the weaker of two mortal enemies, Russia, to isolate the stronger, China. Presumably Vladimir Putin is not so naïve or stupid as to fall for it, but that is the plot of Trump’s handlers. Such a strategy of preventing the growing Russia-China cooperation was urged by Zbigniew Brzezinski in a statement this past summer.
Jordan Young
There is no evidence of what he says taking place. He is relying on future events to prove himself right. He doesn't even equate people's actions to common schemes and tactics. For example, what is occurring with electors right now is a clear example of a shakedown. The roles, actions, and goals are plainly visible.
Nicholas Williams
Okey-Dokey.
Gabriel Long
There is clear evidence of the people who he claims being around Trump being around Trump – because Trump has hired them. The author isn't telling any tales out of school when he links them all to specific think tanks they have been employed by or donate money to.
Trying a repeat of the Nixon strategy, just this time with Russia instead of China, doesn't seem to be far fetched at all. Rather, it couldn't be more obvious unless Trump almost specifically telegraphed it throughout the entire course of his campaign – which he did.
Samuel Thomas
...
Landon Wilson
Literally no one cares
This whole entire piece is just more fucking speculation from someone butt blasted
He's also trying to fit his world view of the American system being entirely broken and in the control of a select group of elites despite the clear elite chosen candidate losing
He puts too much faith into the intelligence of his enemies that any sign of a true change he sees as some trap
It's honestly SAD
Kayden Roberts
to repeat myself
I refuse to take seriously anyone who can vomit such a mess of buzzword nonsense right off the bat. any decent thesis or argument rely on explaining first, and THEM concluding, your shitty article jump right off to the conclusion of Trump being a patriarchal New world order wanna-be fachist. as if it was a natural fact of nature to begin with. then the article goes to try to tie stupid correlation as proof, project into the future the effects of Trump policies, even try to shame the notion of political incorectness. all the while flinging pseudo-intelectual insult like narcisism as if it was a bad thing. Pro-tip for ya, unless we talking Pathological Narcissism, a good deal of narcissistic people still help their next of kin and help elevate the world, Its not about what you are, but what you do.
Also OP suck at critical thinking, by the mere fact of guzzling down such a tenuous pile of horseshit as making any modicum of sense you have exposed yourself as either an unlucky buffoon who obviously only recently heard of this place and felt it was a good place to start a discussion, unbeknownst to you how your offering turns out to be such a ridicule pile of brainfarts. the prospect of an idiot like you even believing such an ugly string of nonsense is so demoralizing that I strongly prefer the alternative of you being either a troll or a shill. While the later is still infuriating as is seeing anyone actively work against the interest of humankind as a whole, at the very least it only insult your integrity.
Gabriel Miller
no summary, clickbait title, blogpost length. Ain't nobody got time for that
Bentley Bailey
...
Bentley Clark
jesus christ could you be a bigger butthurt faggot
Lincoln Collins
...
Andrew Flores
hey …pssst you know what….you didnt make any arguments… at all
way to show your intellect champ
William Reed
...
Luis Ward
I never said it was good or bad just seems to be a whole lot of ass ravaged people at the prospect that maybe there is an overarching strategy to trump.
Christopher Young
...
Adrian Cooper
talking to you normies is like trying to explain to someone why they shouldn't smack themselves in the face with a hammer
Levi Evans
...
Oliver Adams
we also can see you samefag faggot, and yes I explicitly made the argument your OP has no substance to back his claims, challenged his premature conclusions handwaved as facts,
YOU are the shitty OP so full of himself that insofar failed to address any of the specific criticism levied in this thread, yet you have the balls to lecture us. For the record if I process to explain why that blogpost is shit, I get to call it shit, come back when you're ready to prove claims in OP with actual evidence.
Your OP got nothing to back it up, replying to you in the first place is more than generous.
Andrew Johnson
I've read the piece three times now. The connections that are listed are weak and based solely on appointments to try to create a narrative. The only part I was unaware of was the $25 million from Adelson. I knew he donated $5 million, which was far below the $100 million he promised. Jews voted against Trump almost unanimously. Far-right Israeli Jews may prefer Trump, but is that because he is controlled or that they are responding to the Western Jewish rhetoric that is infecting their population? They are quite reliant on their walls and internment camps to keep immigrants at bay. Trump as the war candidate isn't substantiated. Yes, he offended China by taking a call from Taiwan. Though, worrying about offending the Chinese makes it impossible to negotiate with them. They are offended even when you do everything they ask. I'm not sure what to think about Trump being part of a globalist fascist conspiracy and controlled by Bush and Cheney. Is that to scare people on the left? Bush signalling he wanted to cut Trump's throat doesn't fit that narrative.
Samuel Martin
trump literally answers to no one
Asher Martinez
Are you trying to convince me or yourself?
Luis Kelly
The people who told you there are no stupid questions were trying to avoid hurting your feelings.
Jeremiah Smith
Why did over 90% of DC vote for Clinton, if Trump was "always part of NWO plan I swear"?
Kevin Nelson
You people blatantly came here to try and convince us Trump is on the side of the Globalists, and while we can't just chalk everything up to infinite dimensional chess. All of your fucking "arguments" are majority speculation. You people are no more intelligent or influential than the unironic Cruz missiles that came here before the Primaries.
Carter Myers
this is the absolute most shit fucking OP in history that only a braindead moron you're from stormfront aren't you could make. give a fucking summary you dipshit
Michael Lewis
they're called niggers. no one in the NWO actually lives in DC you fucking retard
Eli Lewis
What did I try to convince you of in this thread? Be specific.
Isaac Howard
TL;DR a salty kike trying to badmouth Trump with literally no proof or evidence
OP being smug because no one is bothering to debate his autism
Dylan Hill
fuck off faggot, this is not your blog
Lincoln White
The only substantive conjecture, – yet if these neocohens had the foresight and vision required to do it, we wouldn't be here in the current year.
Comorbidity for psychological disorders: first degree relatives with one, then acquaintances with one. The children show no pathologies of the kind, and they would - without question - were there anything to this. Swamp the names with Clinton and you have an accurate article.
Ryan Brown
Yeah because nobody took Donald as a joke and tried to put money him like Jen bush and Ted Cruz
Nice conspiracy theory tard
Great fucking plan
Nolan Edwards
...
Elijah Gonzalez
wew
Joshua Hughes
yes I just want to agree with those saying this is bad click bait
you can always tell good intellectual writing from bad deceptive articles with 1 simple trick: stop in the middle and examine your own mind and heart
If you feel foggy, if you feel as if you no longer know what's true, especially if you feel that the rational means of obtaining the truth is impossible for you to obtain so you must trust some authority (i.e. the author, in most cases) that is a deceptive and bad writing.
If you feel clearer, if you have absolutely clear and distinct facts in your mind, if you understand the argument after only one reading and feel like you could reconstruct it yourself accurately; and if you feel better about the world and more optimistic about your own chances of obtaining the truth, then that is a good writing and probably honestly written whether it is right or wrong.
You can also look carefully at the kind of statements a writer makes. Honest writers will try to say exactly what they mean with no room for misunderstanding. They will try and teach you something as if you already knew it all along and they were just reminding you. Deceptive writers will write a vague statement or especially a statemeny full of highly emotional overtones which are never clarified or resolved (by a greater specificity, answering potential objections, etc.)
The bottom line is: thr honest writer wants to use a rational argumentation, so he will try to put you in a rational mood. The deceptive writer wants to deceive, and he wants his argument to pass by without undergoing a rational analysis, so he will try to put you in an emotional mood that will make you forget to be rational.
Jack Diaz
The author uses the term patriarchy in a retarded way. He means the Military-Industrial-Intelligence Complex's Old Boys' Club.
And by fascism he means the bad kind, basically truly global corporatocracy, constantly fueled by war. Now we have babby war-corporatocracy.
These people are not necessarily butt-blasted liberals or cuckservatives.
They are usually just the doom-and-gloom type who want to see malice behind everything.
It is just that sometimes this gets quite ridiculous. "It was a plan all along goy!" becomes indefensible after some point. Some people are never satisfied with anything. Such is life.
OP is a troll.
There most certainly is an overarching strategy to Trump. That strategy goes by the name of With Jews We Lose. Our own willful ignorance (warhammer40k.wikia.com
Multi-dimensional chess is not some kind of a joke. imgdurr.com
Reality is complex and can be viewed through all kinds of different angles. Trump has to choose between bad and worse.
Trump is not going to bring down Fractional-Reserve Jewing–err (((Banking))). Even if he wanted to he could not, because that is the system every other potential Superpower uses.
Currently, the only Superpower is the United States. After that we have three other nuclear triad possible Superpower nations, which are Russia China and India (ikr).
Israel is special because of the Samson Option, and because of the ZOG (AIPAC et al).
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
(((Banks))) create money out of thin air, simply by making loans to good (i.e. stupid) goys. This does not reflect reality, as it is not anchored in physical resources, or meaningful human evolution (neuroenhancement, cyborg implants, eugenics, genetic engineering, etc).
A people who value the services of a high-class prostitute as much as a marvel of technological autism-ingenuity such as a personal computer are hopeless. The goal should be space travel, not (((keeping up))) with the Joneses (while the Jews take care of our societies for us).
positivemoney.org
positivemoney.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
Let us become Space Marines and leave all this faggotry behind.
Gas hedonism, space colonization now.
warhammer40k.wikia.com
Nathan Johnson
Stopped reading there, Holla Forums. U mad?
Leo Davis
Terrible thread OP. Have you considered suicide?
Brandon Richardson
stopped reading at patriarchs
Carson Ward
Black pill fags are the worst. Remember, traitors are the first to die.
The sad reality is that we live in a nightmare closer to Brazil than 1984. It definitely is the Jews, and the white and Asian collaborators along side them, but they are barely capable of keeping their divergent plans on the rails. A good portion of their (((power))) is an illusion.
Asher Long
I love this!
"It's absolutely nothing" - the post.
You guys blew almost 2 billion trying to defeat Trump. And he could have (at any time) taken their money and agreed with standard neo-con talking points. This would have still led to a high chance of election, with not nearly as much cost.
Trumps results will be the proof. All of us here know that much.
AND THERE IS NOTHING YOU CAN DO TO STOP IT