Hello :)

...

...

But seriously, how do you plan on protecting private property without a state? If you legally "own" a piece of land but you're not using it and you can't defend it, what makes it yours?

I know you people don't care about anyone and leftism is just a reflection of your own self-hatred and disgust. But at least let us leave peacefully

Yeah, and we're the statists.

Won't work sorry

"Hah! I'll have you know my private police force and private courts are totally not a state!"

Lol we have bitcoin !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

...

Okay, but how are you going to protect your private property without a government?

"Left" anarchists can bitch all they want, they have plenty in common with ancaps.

They're not because they provide a service that we can voluntarily choose not to pay for

Name one peaceful capitalist society

idk ill figure that out after

no, you can die with the rest of your anarchist kin

and if you don't, how do you plan to keep your property?

switzerland, hong kong, singapore, original US

geez

You choose to pay protection money to the private police force because the alternative is being a target of violence.
How is this different from the way things are now?

original US

You aren't an anarchist.

If you don't pay then you'll have to arm yourself and defend it yourself

Singapore is peaceful?

I thought you were supposed to be anti statist? You can't chew gum there.

Switzerland is a proxy banking front for violent nations.

The original US was built on genocide.

Are you literally completely retarded?

Get out man.
These guys are insufferable cunts.
all the way from the Edgy Nihilist to the Leninists they all hate the FREE market and the freedom and right to own private property.
These guys are 50% Stalinists that love central planning (they run out of toilet paper every time they try it) and the remaining 50% are autistic lazy Socdems.
Anfems are the slave masters of this board,this place will drive you crazy, any time you see the Nihilist, Tankie and Anfem flag get out as soon as possible.

Just like the state today then. Pay up or defend yourself.

Don't forget slavery!

It's in the fucking image.

I agree anarchism is a loaded term that we best leave alone and just call ourselves voluntarists :)

pick one

...

Singapore and hong kong have been revived through capitalist policies. There's no anarcho-capitalist country as you probably know :)

what exactly stops me, Bill Gates, from buying a large private army and ruling over the rest of you?

extremely authoritarian capitalist policies.

The only way to save capitalism.

And yet there are examples of functioning anarchist societies.

So… what does that tell you?

The state is a product of capitalism. Where you have capitalism, you have a state

No, anarchism is the rejection of institutional hierarchies. Capitalism preserves them, therefore you are not anarchist. You trade a monopoly of property on power for one of state. There is no difference.

You said peaceful. Polls across the eastern bloc show they preferred socialism to capitalism. Especially Khazikstan.

...

You do realize the state was birthed out of capitalism in the United States? Not the other way around?

Marxists and anarchists just have two different definitions of what a state is. Neither is more true than the other, but it's hella frustrating to see the two sides bitch about states when they are talking about two different things

Someone please post the quote where Adam Smith explains why capilism must have a state so I won't have to spell it out.

If Gorbachev takes central planned economy, decentralizes it, and opens it up foreign markets, is it still central planning?

You should be able to solve this.

Not capitalism in particular, it's a result of the irreconcilable, conflicting interests between classes. We've had states before we've had capitalism.

I guess socialism is just capitalism then.

what happens when you go to work?

sorry the CURRENT state is a product of capitalism

So the state extracts wealth through taxation to bail out banks and that's an argument against capitalism? :///

Calm down free markets were only introduced recently it will take awhile but we can already see tremendous improvement :)

it is you blithering whelp. Money that could much better spent elsewhere, a socialist government wouldn't have this problem.

No, but taxes were put into place( as I said before it went capitalism > state in the United States) because it was literally so fucking unstable to be poor they were required.

There are many, many capitalism nations that are poor. Like I said before, polls across the eastern bloc show that the people prefer socialism to capitalism. "Now the shops are full, but no one can afford to buy anything."

Okay.
Let's say that there are 8 people in the city and you're one of them.
You own a million dollars and the others and starving. What's to stop them from simply taking your shit?

Ahh… Just like the good old days!

You can come up with these scenarios for every political and economic system

Just another day in Ayncapistan

Refute this situation being possible.

xD well poverty was going down steadily unlike now that we introduce welfare, sustainable growth through free markets is the only way :)

Nah. He is a genuine Anarchist.
See:

This is a vile slander. I'm 100% Stalinist.

to all commies here:

Instead of living in a country where you have the freedom to talk about this. Have the right to bear arms. Have a free market where it motivates you to make and create. How about you just go live in a socialist country. There is a reason that there are no fully instated communism countries around. Now since you just said that you would kill me because I do not believe in what you do. I am de adding you. There is a reason that the USSR Crumbled. People starving. I might report you. Hell i don't know but. You are living a country where you have all this freedom. There IS A FUCKING REASON THIS COUNTRY HAS SURVIVED FOR 240 YEARS. Good day to you sir, and god bless America

and then we run out of planet, what then MR ancap cos its already happening

I can't wait until summer ends and you go back to reddit

am I being baited

...

No.

Please answer the question and I'll tell you how an actual anarchist would answer this question.

Without a state, how would you prevent these people from simply taking your stuff?

Okay, I choose Rojava

I thought you were quoting this at first.

When nigga?

Welfare started being introduced by the Liberal party in the UK in 1910s. Poverty has decreased since then but increased ever since its started being removed.

Yes. Capital always concentrates into the hands of those who have the most capital. You need to spend money to make money, and the people with the most money to spend are the ones who already have money.

Rich people are rich because they're good at managing money. And if they spend money on an investment, it's because they're reasonably sure they'll make a profit from it.

When this situation comes to its inevitable conclusion, too much capital is concentrated into the top percentage of the population and there's not enough money going around for the economy to support itself, thrusting the economy into crisis. The state doesn't redistribute wealth because it wants to interfere with the free market. It does these things in order to keep capitalism going.

Yeah it was going down and creating weath, welfare state made everyone not poor but they became depressed slobs who don't have an incentive to be great :(

...

And this is an argument AGAINST the welfare state?

I'm going to stop now I feel bad beating on disabled 9 year olds

RUDE!

Implying anyone but those at the top would be happy to live in ancapistan.

it's not because you're spooked by muh american dream
or religion
or the increasingly militarised police force
or the materialistic culture

Basically, hang yourself.

...

We're not going to be evil statists, we're just going to purge you all violently from society on an individual basis because what you do is morally abhorrent.

...

In fact one more, if, through investment etc, one person becomes the CEO of a global monopoly of every single industry, with his/her own large private police and military that does his/her bidding.

That would be fine, to you. Yes?

MEME

See

They lose their bootstraps, which is the real tragedy.

First thing you learn in law school is don't fight the hypothetical. Just fucking answer it.

I don't have an issue with hypotheticals it's just they don't really undermine anything at all. No political system can deal with every little scenario that you can come up with

wow

Ancap pls respond

He asked one question.

Certainly, but it should be able to prevent the abhorrent ones.

As long as they don't violate the NAP :)

Only realistic hypothetical scenarios should be taken into account :)

...

...

hahahahah xD

No but this is an essential fucking question. In every other system, they'd say "the state", "the commune" or "we'd have eliminated economic inequality".

So which one is it?

Reddit is that way, friend.

kys faggot

what was the question again?

I don't go there

Let's say that there are 8 people in the city and you're one of them.

You own a million dollars and the others and starving. What's to stop them from simply taking your shit?

...

You should try it, you evidently belong there.

I am here to protect my ancap brother from the statist cucks

Anyway goodbye my anarchist friends a hope we can build a stateless society in the future together you will live in your commune and we will live in our underwater city

Because Brexit was supported because 'mug scary Brown people'.

My guns

...

I think you mean Apple inc. iCity (TM)

This

1 of you
7 of them

They likely have adequate weaponry too, so unless you think all capitalists are übermenschen, it isn't going to work.

He shows symptoms of sustained and detailed delusions, talk therapy and attempts to reason have shown no effect. Recommend Olanzapine.

Well I will die then by criminals killing me, it happens sometimes

that would violate the NAP

W E W

Please respond. I genuinely want a rebuttal

But user, you can't do that. NAP.

you do realize that anarchism is historically a leftist movement yes?

I didn't say I'd kill them but I would if they were trying to steal my stuff

I'm saying they'd kill me and be criminals who violated the NAP :(

Okay. So you're an idiot.
Unlike the other capitalists who will establish guards to protect their massive wealth, that will obey them and them alone.

And thus we have mini-states.

No buts. NAP.

Dude he said 8 people, 7 of which want to kill me I can't establish guards with that

Have you even read a book on economy? Even reading a fucking highschool textbook will tell you that our economy is practically designed to enter a recession. (just google 'economic cycle') That ain't caused by government welfare, that's caused by the forces of the free market. The government actually serves to mitigate that, since it's been proven time and time again that if you leave those forces to their own devices the economy will crash and burn.

I really can't believe you guys want to get rid of the state; you should be kissing its ass and giving it a blowjob. If it weren't for the state protecting your free market, capitalism would have been gone a long time ago.

no, you are wrong
anarchism is all about being anti state/goverment/skydaddy/stalin/führer erc

Okay, so you pay off three of them to beat the others up.
Easy. State. Capitalism.

...

Name the first theorist to consider themselves an 'anarcho capitalist'

Read Proudhon.

They can be enforced by the individual in that case me but it's still unlikely that I'd live if I was fighting 8 people by myself

Wrong. Anarchism is anti hierarchy. This includes state, but it's the reason every anarchist was a socialist as well.

Yeah, so again, being a smart anarchist you hire some of the poor people to be your police and thus establish a state.
Adam Smith went on about how states and inequality and thus private property were wholly mutually dependent on each other.

And let me us add: Adam Smith was nobody's fucking socialist.

...

Wait, why are you supporting establishing a system that would have a high likelyhood of just getting you killed.

Here's an idea that would solve your problem: How about your local community bands together to protect themselves from these criminals and bandits, forming a militia. Now they're at it, they take control of the local businesses to prevent people from just hoarding their wealth, and manage it communally. Congratulations, you have anarchism. Also socialism.

If property rights are enforced by the individual then surely only what you have the power to maintain control over is your property?

"Men may live together in society with some tolerable degree of security, though there is no civil magistrate to protect them from the injustice of those passions. But avarice and ambition in the rich, in the poor the hatred of labour and the love of present ease and enjoyment, are the passions which prompt to invade property, passions much more steady in their operation, and much more universal in their influence. Wherever there is great property there is great inequality. For one very rich man there must be at least five hundred poor, and the affluence of the few supposes the indigence of the many. The affluence of the rich excites the indignation of the poor, who are often both driven by want, and prompted by envy, to invade his possessions. It is only under the shelter of the civil magistrate that the owner of that valuable property, which is acquired by the labour of many years, or perhaps of many successive generations, can sleep a single night in security. He is at all times surrounded by unknown enemies, whom, though he never provoked, he can never appease, and from whose injustice he can be protected only by the powerful arm of the civil magistrate continually held up to chastise it. The acquisition of valuable and extensive property, therefore, necessarily requires the establishment of civil government. Where there is no property, or at least none that exceeds the value of two or three days' labour, civil government is not so necessary. Civil government supposes a certain subordination. But as the necessity of civil government gradually grows up with the acquisition of valuable property, so the principal causes which naturally introduce subordination gradually grow up with the growth of that valuable property. (…) Men of inferior wealth combine to defend those of superior wealth in the possession of their property, in order that men of superior wealth may combine to defend them in the possession of theirs. All the inferior shepherds and herdsmen feel that the security of their own herds and flocks depends upon the security of those of the great shepherd or herdsman; that the maintenance of their lesser authority depends upon that of his greater authority, and that upon their subordination to him depends his power of keeping their inferiors in subordination to them. They constitute a sort of little nobility, who feel themselves interested to defend the property and to support the authority of their own little sovereign in order that he may be able to defend their property and to support their authority. Civil government, so far as it is instituted for the security of property, is in reality instituted for the defence of the rich against the poor, or of those who have some property against those who have none at all." (Source: The Wealth of Nations, Book 5, Chapter 1, Part 2)

...

ancaps don't even get a mention

Feelsgoodman.jpg

Imagine being that much of an irrelevant shitposter

Anarcho Monarchism is the better version of Anarcho Capitalism

Soon.

Agreed

What's the difference?

youtube.com/watch?v=YIffz-72B8Y&index=3

this song plays when I enter my apartment in my local ancap metropolis, only class and wealth there are no poor people everyone is peaceful meanwhile at the commune next door anarcho-syndicalists are planning how to take over the metropolis and behead us just because they are jealous of our success

Holy shit. My nanny just came into my room to bring me a plate of dividendies and I literally screamed at her and hit the plate of dividendies out of her hand. She started yelling and swearing at me and I slammed the door on her. I’m so distressed right now I don’t know what to do. I didn’t mean to do that to my nanny but I’m literally in shock from this article. I feel like I’m going to explode. Why the fucking fuck is wikipedia this statist? This can’t be happening. I’m having a fucking breakdown. I don’t want to believe the world is so socialist. I want a future to prostitute infants in. I want Ron Paul to be president and fix this broken country. I cannot fucking deal with this right now. It wasn’t supposed to be like this, I thought Anarcho-Capitalism was popular among well adjusted alpha males like me???? This is so fucked.

So who cleans the toilets? And works in the factories? Also, since there are no poor people there must be no unemployed, so inflation must be massive.

GTFO you fucking commie

I was shooting heroin and reading “The Fountainhead” in the front seat of my privately owned police cruiser when a call came in. I put a quarter in the radio to activate it. It was the chief.
“Bad news, detective. We got a situation.”
“What? Is the mayor trying to ban trans fats again?”
“Worse. Somebody just stole four hundred and forty-seven million dollars’ worth of bitcoins.”
The heroin needle practically fell out of my arm. “What kind of monster would do something like that? Bitcoins are the ultimate currency: virtual, anonymous, stateless. They represent true economic freedom, not subject to arbitrary manipulation by any government. Do we have any leads?”
“Not yet. But mark my words: we’re going to figure out who did this and we’re going to take them down … provided someone pays us a fair market rate to do so.”
“Easy, chief,” I said. “Any rate the market offers is, by definition, fair.”
He laughed. “That’s why you’re the best I got, Lisowski. Now you get out there and find those bitcoins.”
“Don’t worry,” I said. “I’m on it.”
I put a quarter in the siren. Ten minutes later, I was on the scene. It was a normal office building, strangled on all sides by public sidewalks. I hopped over them and went inside.
“Home Depot™ Presents the Police!®” I said, flashing my badge and my gun and a small picture of Ron Paul. “Nobody move unless you want to!” They didn’t.
“Now, which one of you punks is going to pay me to investigate this crime?” No one spoke up.
“Come on,” I said. “Don’t you all understand that the protection of private property is the foundation of all personal liberty?”
It didn’t seem like they did.
“Seriously, guys. Without a strong economic motivator, I’m just going to stand here and not solve this case. Cash is fine, but I prefer being paid in gold bullion or autographed Penn Jillette posters.”
Nothing. These people were stonewalling me. It almost seemed like they didn’t care that a fortune in computer money invented to buy drugs was missing.
I figured I could wait them out. I lit several cigarettes indoors. A pregnant lady coughed, and I told her that secondhand smoke is a myth. Just then, a man in glasses made a break for it.
“Subway™ Eat Fresh and Freeze, Scumbag!®” I yelled.
Too late. He was already out the front door. I went after him.
“Stop right there!” I yelled as I ran. He was faster than me because I always try to avoid stepping on public sidewalks. Our country needs a private-sidewalk voucher system, but, thanks to the incestuous interplay between our corrupt federal government and the public-sidewalk lobby, it will never happen.
I was losing him. “Listen, I’ll pay you to stop!” I yelled. “What would you consider an appropriate price point for stopping? I’ll offer you a thirteenth of an ounce of gold and a gently worn ‘Bob Barr ‘08’ extra-large long-sleeved men’s T-shirt!”
He turned. In his hand was a revolver that the Constitution said he had every right to own. He fired at me and missed. I pulled my own gun, put a quarter in it, and fired back. The bullet lodged in a U.S.P.S. mailbox less than a foot from his head. I shot the mailbox again, on purpose.
“All right, all right!” the man yelled, throwing down his weapon. “I give up, cop! I confess: I took the bitcoins.”
“Why’d you do it?” I asked, as I slapped a pair of Oikos™ Greek Yogurt Presents Handcuffs® on the guy.
“Because I was afraid.”
“Afraid?”
“Afraid of an economic future free from the pernicious meddling of central bankers,” he said. “I’m a central banker.”
I wanted to coldcock the guy. Years ago, a central banker killed my partner. Instead, I shook my head.
“Let this be a message to all your central-banker friends out on the street,” I said. “No matter how many bitcoins you steal, you’ll never take away the dream of an open society based on the principles of personal and economic freedom.”
He nodded, because he knew I was right. Then he swiped his credit card to pay me for arresting him.

There's so much wealth and competition drove prices so low that everyone is practically rich.
plus automation removed all the necessity for people to do the shittier jobs C:

tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/PoesLaw

ANCAP BTFO

Fucking statist scum, Who are you to say I can't pay my workers a negative wage? I'm giving them valuable working experience, I should be able to demand they pay me for the hours they work.

So, if everything is automated, don't you pretty much already have communism? I mean, why work if machines can already do everything for you?

That was never the argument. The argument was that capitalism needs government to keep it alive.

what if the ai surpasses human intelligence and enslaves our race?

That's really funny lol can you post more?

it's a bad one sorry

So it's only slavery when machines do it?

Who said anything about an AI? You can have fully automated factories and farms without a sentient computer.

no
we have to defend ourselves from private property claims, a de facto declaration of violence against anyone who doesn't believe in soul-bonding with inanimate objects
sorry to disrespect your faith

That makes the assumption that AI has a reason to act like us - there is no advantage to enslaving us if you have great power and the ability to improve yourself. At worst, in the efforts to improve themselves they may accidentally end up destroying the atmosphere or using up all the resources on earth and killing us off that way, but it will never be malicious.

...

of course, It's a time old fact that capitalism is compatible with communism. there is nothing stopping you from creating a capitalist society within communism, like there is stopping you from creating a communist society within capitalism. it all comes down to voluntary association. the fact that capitalists refuse to do this, and only ever attempt to destroy communist societies through wars and coercion is proof of their ideological failure. If you like capitalism so much, there will be nothing stopping you in communism from voluntarily giving everything you produce at your job to me, and for me to give you a fraction of it's value back as a wage. It just has to be voluntary. What, do you not like that? do you think no one would agree to this arrangement without threats of force or starvation?

If identity politics are meaningless, demographics under a smaller, less corrupt state don't matter. We want to destroy the state, regardless of identity. If identity politics are meaningless, then a pure-white commune is superior to a diverse multicultural capitalist super-state

But we all know that (((leftists))) really just hate white people

Dude, I like not having smallpox.

If everyone thought the same way i do Anarcho Capitalism would work and no one would violate the NAP

Reddit's that way.

Fucking burgers thinking that's a long time

If everyone thought the same way I do, we would be living in a perfect utopia.

Sounds boring tbh.

Privatization of the commons is theft. You did not obtain permission of the rest of the populace to claim a piece of land.

My country has survived for a thousand years. We were also a monarchy for most of it.

… Anarcho-Monarchism FTW!

Well, duh.

Yes we want to genocide white people, you got us, you're truly enlightened.

hey op, tell me why a socialist society can't be voluntary.
Say I own disney, and most of florida is my territory. I then issue bonds to all the people living in my territory (who also work for me) so everyone is an equal owner. Everyone is paid in guaranteed housing, food, entertainment, medical care, etc. Boom, you have a centrally planned non-market economy that is also voluntary (the only punishment for non-violent conduct being expulsion or cut access to entertainment etc)

I would love to live in a socialist country.

Too bad they always get destroyed by western imperialism or at least sabotaged to an unlivable state.

...

I don't think you have a good grasp on what identity politics is.

The worst part is I know you probably believe this unironically

I know that's a troll but hahahaha oh my fucking god

...

You can't just steal Holla Forums memes and expect it it to make sense. When we say "Reddits that way," we mean "you're beliefs are so out of left field it's clear you're not from around here, it sounds more like you're from Reddit." But it doesn't make sense here because Reddit agreees with you fags.

You're beliefs have led to the deaths of millions of white Christians, but you don't care. You're new beliefs in multiculturalism and open borders would inevitably lead to the end of white people, but you don't care. That's because you hate white people.

And I have more evidence! The EU is a global capitalist superstate. It's the opposite of what you people claim to want, but you supported it just because it hurt white people. You Jews hate white people.

ONLY I AM TRULY EDGY LOOK AT ME AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

anarcho monarchism is no joke
this land is the kings private property. hand over an entrance fee you statist

Are you trying to gaslight me? Holy shit.

Please stop. Even as a troll this is cringe.

You haven't been here long, have you?

HUMANS VERSUS ORCS ITS THAT SIMPLE OKAY

Christianity is a tool of the joos to promote egalitarianism and keep goys out of banking
christianity = communism
you fell for it goy

...

Yeah, you're a Jew alright

Nah, different goy. If your faggot mods had thought to add ids on this board you could see that

HUMANS VERSUS ORCS

…….

Yeah, you're a Nazi alright

OY VEY MUH 600000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

The fact that you inbred SUBHUMANS catch typhus to easily isn't my problem

try again

Fascism and Nazism killed millions of white Christians also you fucking turd

The problem with Nazis is that you can't really tell whether it's satire or if they're really just that fucked up.

You'll never find perfect at any point in history or the future.

That's no reason to settle for shit-tier .

Also "original United States 'Company Towns' of America".
And "original United States 'Slavery' of America".

Regular conservatism has a marketing problem, fascism is what's hip. The movement still needs time to actually back the positions without memes, though.

The reason I say that is because he'd answered with 4 examples. It's nit-picking. A perfectly peaceful society of any type will never be found.

...

We'll apologize for Dresden once you apologize for invading Poland. Churchill even spoke highly of Mussolini till Hitler tried to take over Europe.

yeah kill yourself.

should have gone for a second bombing run tbh

Hitler didn't invade Poland. He invaded German land which was stolen by world Jewry and held at the time by the Polish government. This is Post-WWI history 101, cunt

And I don't need the approval of Winston Fucking Churchill

Oy vey, it's anudda Weltkrieg.

It's not really nit-picking when you can literally come up with a dozen good arguments for why it was bad.

We should always be critical of systems and societies, otherwise we get things like "well yeah, Capitalism sucks but it's the best we got. All systems have flaws."

That's why Poland asked for the support of the allies right :^) He was a good boi who dindu muffin

The treaty of Versaille was unfair. That is true. The policy was called 'Lebensraum' however. You invaded other countries to extend your living room. Hitler was unapologetic about this. Don't tarnish his memory

Don't cloud the issue with red herrings. If violent expansion is enough to warrant the rape of your women, the murder of your men, the destruction of your government, and the colonization of your land, then the British Empire, the USSR, and the US should have suffered the same fate. They also were violent expanders. The only difference between those three nations and Nazi Germany was that they had a Jewish elite and Nazi Germany didn't. That's why they were destroyed.

...

I ask you: Do you believe with the Führer and us in the final total victory of the German people?

I ask you: Are you resolved to follow the Führer through thick and thin to victory, and are you willing to accept the heaviest personal burdens?

Second, The English say that the German people are tired of fighting.

I ask you: Are you ready to follow the Führer as the phalanx of the homeland, standing behind the fighting army and to wage war with wild determination through all the turns of fate until victory is ours?

Third: The English maintain that the German people have no desire any longer to accept the government’s growing demands for war work.

I ask you: Are you and the German people willing to work, if the Führer orders, 10, 12 and if necessary 14 hours a day and to give everything for victory?

Fourth: The English maintain that the German people is resisting the government’s total war measures. It does not want total war, but capitulation! (Shouts: Never! Never! Never!)

I ask you: Do you want total war? If necessary, do you want a war more total and radical than anything that we can even imagine today?

Fifth: The English maintain that the German people have lost faith in the Führer.

I ask you: Is your confidence in the Führer greater, more faithful and more unshakable than ever before? Are you absolutely and completely ready to follow him wherever he goes and do all that is necessary to bring the war to a victorious end? (The crowd rises as one man. It displays unprecedented enthusiasm. Thousands of voices join in shouting: “Führer command, we follow!” A wave of shouts of Heil flows through the hall. As if by command, the flags and standards are raised as the highest expression of the sacred moment in which the crowd honors the Führer.)

Sixth, I ask you: Are you ready from now on to give your full strength to provide the Eastern Front with the men and munitions it needs to give Bolshevism the death blow?

-Goebbels, 1943

Wew lad.

You're right, those nations should've been completely dissolved and destroyed. Great point, I'm glad we agree.

Yeah they should be destroyed. All of them. :D
The Nazi's also had that, killing 5.5-6 million jews thing.

they should actually turn to communism

forgot to take off my shitpost flag

Not all of us are anarkiddies

Maybe if you've never left the culdesac. Black Facebook is funny as hell.

We will get satoshi to find a way to code the NAP into the robots

answer my post Nazi faggot. Hitler didn't make excuses, he said these invasions were the right thing to do and he stood by it. Why do you denounce him now?

Oh shit Holla Forums, what are you doing?

...

Telling people to kill themselves is passé. Now all cool kids are smug

Follow your ancestors

...

But i thought the Holocaust didn't happened…

I'd hate to have your worldview tbh

Of course it didn't happen, it was all jewish propaganda.

They had it coming, though.

Troll, cognitive dissonance, or very badly worded post… I can't make up my mind.

...

Nah, you're just an autistic redditard without a sense of irony

holocaust denial has long been compared to Freud's teapot.
I returned your teapot undamaged, it was damaged when you gave it to me, and I never borrowed your teapot.
The holocaust never happened, but they had it coming, and they don't have grounds to complain about it because the same thing is happening to the Palestinians.

You too.

Satire, famrade.

That was bite anfem.

Did I say I thought it was sincere?
the point remains there are people who think exactly that.

Who the fuck do you think I am

Now you're saying Communists support the EU? Did you forget to take your meds today?

Still not answering my post. Why do you make excuses for what the fuhrer considered duty?

That's true. I love the "There were no mass graves, there were mass graves but they were typhus victims, the vast amount of non-typhus victims weren't all jews therefore the holocaust didn't happen.

You're partially, right, for i'm quite autistic indeed, so let's analyze

Two lines:
the holocaust didn't happened
They had it coming

To have something coming means to deserve what one receives, so it implies that the jews deserved and received the holocaust, so it implies the holocaust happened.

From there is indeed 3 possibilities for that non sequitur:
intentional, as a means of satire or trolling
unintentional by ideology, literal doublethink.
Or unintentional by faulty language, so Holla Forumsack actually meant: The holocaust didn't happened but the Jews WOULD have it coming.

nice troll thread

...

...

This conversation started over Brexit, fam

Obligatory

Czechoslovakia. Your point is invalid.

STILL HAVEN'T ANSWERED MY QUESTION I THOUGHT LEFTISTS WERE SUPPOSED TO BE PUSSIES AND YET YOU ARE TOO MUCH OF A BITCH TO TYPE SOME WORDS IN REPLY TO A SHITPOSTER ON Holla Forums MY GOD YOU GOBBLE SO MUCH COCK HOW DO YOU NOT GET SICK OF THE SALTINESS????!!!?????

What question? There aren't ids on this shit board, I can't see your other posts, fam.

I have a flag and I've asked you three times. Hitler stated that the invasions in the Sudetenland, Poland etc were for the expansion of Lebensraum for the superior Germanic peoples who deserved to live there.

He didn't make these wishy washy excuses. So why do you denounce him?

See

Of course the faggot bails when stuck to the question at hand.

I never denounced any of his invasions. He was right.
Where did I say I denounced his invasions, you lying like?

Some of us can't sit at our computers all day you jobless commie

And I'm saying accusing all leftists of supporting the European Union is beyond idiotic. Find me a Marxist-Leninist who's against Brexit and pro-EU.

Strange, you seem to somehow find plenty of time to shitpost here every single day

It's your own hell.

If you allow people to leave and keep to yourselves, fine. Plenty will, when they experience the hell for themselves.

It's the weekend, faggot. Now answer the question.

You answered to this , you said the world was dogpiling on Germay lwhen they did nothing wrong.

The lebensraum was openly aggressive policy but your post imply that is was defensive .

Hitler was less of a hypocritical faggot about his goals than you.

dogpiling on Germay *like they did nothing wrong.

Shlomo, you don't know who is posting every day

Oy vey, even today, Nazi Germany can't catch a break.

I answered the question cunt. I answered by saying that I didn't oppose it.

What's funny is that you people are talking about it for the reason I said you talked about it, to cloud the issue. It was violent expansion, and if violent expansion is enough to warrant the rape of your women, the murder of your men, the destruction of your government, and the colonization of your land, then the British Empire, the USSR, and the US should have suffered the same fate. But you fags endorse the USSR, which commuted all the alleged sins of Nazi Germany's and than some!

thanks bruh, saved me yet more typing

tsk tsk

top kek

What if ancapism is the only modern system that would keep the state at its most minimal.

I literally never criticized his policy or said it was defensive. Hitler was right about arguing with Jews

People saying the exact same shit you say post here everyday. So we can easily assume it's the same guy posting everyday. That or it's identical drones relaying. I don't know what the more pathetic.

Not relevant to the discussion. BACK THEN, Germany started the war, and BACK THEN, the Allies retaliated. The nazis weren't exactly innocents.

And yet you're being a little faggot about it, let me simplify: Hitler believed in the rightful claim of the Aryans to rule over the world, he fired up Germans with a spirit of conquest, Nazis were like:"Germany Fuck yeah", you on the other hand are implying they were more like "we-we're only defending ourselves !"
So why are you making Hitler a faggot user?

What's funny is that you people are talking about it for the reason I said you talked about it, to cloud the issue. It was violent expansion, and if violent expansion is enough to warrant the rape of your women, the murder of your men, the destruction of your country
Do I have to remind you who started the war and what the SS Eiensatzgruppen did on the Eastern Front?

The saying about the Jew crying out as he strikes you seems more applicable to Nazis, it seems.

…. you implied it was defensive by saying you were and I quote 'dogpiled' and that's why you had to fight.

So in this case, you are in fact the jew.

daily reminder

I literally never said anything about defensiveness. You're just being a kike word-twister

That quote applies to you guys. You were expansionist empires trying to take over the world who said "OY vey, those Nazis are trying to take over the world. Time to go rape and murder them!"

...

I didn't say you said it. I said you implied it. So don't twist my words… kike word twister

German-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact. Who violated it first?

Claims Nazi killed a lot of people

Imply Nazi were only defending themselves

Listen m8, nazism is not about simply defending the Fatherland, nazism is about supremacy. They played that game and they lost. Either you own it up and say, "fuck you, my tribe deserve to rule over you you brown peasants, we'll get you next time" and you stop playing victim, or you're only caring about the perpetuation of the tribe with no other ambitions, in this case, Nazism is not the ideology fitting you the most.

Not an argument.

Y'all just mad that Steban Molymeme would rip all of you a new arsehole if you tried debating him.

Bump!

...

Being this Triggered.
kek.

No.

>Not forcing people to listen to the king boss.

Eh sorry to burst your bubble comrade…
But Stefanie Molyneux is a cult leader, fascist in disguise, contradicts himself over and over again and a Racist. No Anarcho(Voluntarist to avoid triggering the Bunkered lefties) capitalist would endorse a candidate, he is actually despised for all his inconsistencies with the Ancaps and Agorists.

Love life and Anarchy
Stefan Molyneux
Christopher Cantwell
Just remember, here you will always face hatred, because this Autists are spooked by currencies, trade, the free market and private property. just a bunch of Idealistic armchair "Anarchists" and the rest are Authoritarian lefties.

Bleugh, fuck off bourge scum.

Copyright infringement does not violate the NAP – a "death squad" does.

he is literally a mental retard. His brain does not function at the capacity a normal human beings should. I pity him.

Pretty good

I don't know why everyone obsesses over washed up Molyneux. He's been shit for years and I'm surprised anyone pays him any attention at all since Godus.

Yeah, totally irrational to be afraid of the cult of islam and be pissed at your great hometown being overrun by shitskins?

youtube.com/watch?v=jaCYiBT5EVI

Fuck off, cheeseburger. Only retards and Americans (admittedly redundant distinction) think Pakistan is part of the EU.

Did you even read what I was replying to, you dumb irrational american-hating faggot? I'm european btw.

Yeah, you replied to some vague 'muh muslims' post with 'muh muslims'. Then you expected people to watch a documentary because you're too fucking lazy to type your own argument.

Where in Europe are you from?

user implied that voting out makes no sense because there's no issue with shitskins overtaking beautiful peaceful white communities. Native population has every reason to be pissed off at hating living in their communities that are now completely destroyed. Some people like myself don't live in such communities but I heavily empathize with these people as I very much like the western values practiced in my own community.

Portugal

The Brits that voted out because they're sick of Muslims are buttfuck retarded. The white communities in shithole areas have done a far better job destroying themselves by being greedy fuck employers, abusing heroin, alcohol, thieving, casual violence and generally being shit stirring, feud loving fuckboys. Not to forget cultural anti-intellectualism.

Outside of areas like that they find someone else to blame anyway, like the unemployed or disabled. I'd like Corbyn in but the average Brit is such a selfish cunt I'd be truly surprised if he won.

Also the Muslims here came from Pakistan, which has in the purest sense of the word nothing to do with the EU.

t. white brit from 35% muslim town overrun with unemployment, drugs and alcohol problems

Indeed, they have a problem with degeneracy caused by cultural marxists and relativists. We must end the left and your destructive ideas.

But we can deal with one problem at a time. And that problem has no easy solutions. So let's focus on the ones that are easy to solve.

The EU let the refugees in in order to bolster the workforce as it had slipped into decline. The moral choice is a political meme used as positive PR to canvass liberals and the left, but anyone that has been into politics for more than two weeks knows that it is only ever considered as an afterthought for public opinion.

I think we'll agree that feminism has lowered the birth rate due more women seeking out careers, but it's a problem with neoliberal capitalism itself that it requires two people working full time to fund a home, without even beginning on a family. The governments have no right to act surprised when this lowers birth rates, and they've tried pulling in immigrants from other countries as well as outright bribing people to have more children. the refugees were their last resort.

This is a bad meme and you should feel bad. I've never seen it outside of any context that doesn't fit in with nationalists getting mad at globalisation and trying to bandwagon McCarthyist American attitudes. It just sounds silly as fuck when you can quite rightly get angry at globalisation without dragging a load of political baggage and an act of terrorism into it (referring to Breivik of course).

You're not an anarchist.

Still not an argument.

Explain how ancomism is statist.