The greasy Greek fuck finally admits it guys!!!

the fucking psycho who stalks other leftists and doxxes them

Holy reeding all this shit I think he should rename his channel to "Hate Life and Fascism"

How do you dox people? Does anyone know how? Could somebody just go ahead and do it to him?

Who is the nazi guy?

I know what I'm doing, but I'll need to know what's going on (makes it far easier if someone gets me up to speed).

...

More like instead of consuming Cheetos and Pepsi.

He's from Australia

If you can't be bothered, I can't.

He's in Melbourne, but was born in Greece.

Here: instagram.com/evokelabs/
twitter.com/evokelabs
au.linkedin.com/in/adrianpikios
teamtreehouse.com/adrianpikios
vimeo.com/user3004404
disqus.com/by/adrianpikios/
imgrum.net/user/evokelabs/367585331/984676371601371843_367585331
auscompanies.com/en/53470501232/PIKIOS-ADRIAN
evokelabs.com/

Yea that Australian "citizen" from Europe raping, pillaging, murdering the Australians is "Australian" because he has been granted "citizenship" from the government.

Much better!

His, er, real name is his username. Why is everyone struggling?

are you up to something?

bump for interest

I'm having a little poke around, Australia seems to be the only country that doesn't force you to include your actual address with a business. His parents would have slipped up the address somewhere, probably.

Didn't one of the sites linked provide his addreess

His name is Adrian Pikios. He has so many accounts on multiple sites that can be found just by searching for his name or his company's nae on Google.

I didn't click all of them, just the ones I usually use.

He didn't pay for private WHOIS info.
domainhistory.net/evokelabs.com

Registrant Name: Adrian Pikios
Registrant Organization: Evoke Labs
Registrant Street: 140 Bestic Street Brighton Le Sands
Registrant City: Sydney
Registrant State/Province: NSW
Registrant Postal Code: 2216
Registrant Country: AU
Registrant Phone: +61.0432711801
Registrant Phone Ext:
Registrant Fax:
Registrant Fax Ext:
Registrant Email: [email protected]/* */
Registry Admin ID:
Admin Name: Adrian Pikios
Admin Organization: Evoke Labs
Admin Street: 140/B Bestic Street
Admin City: Sydney
Admin State/Province: NSw
Admin Postal Code: 2216
Admin Country: AU
Admin Phone: +61.020419955929
Admin Phone Ext:
Admin Fax:
Admin Fax Ext:
Admin Email: [email protected]/* */

for quick reference

Ah, yes I forgot to add it's worth saving WHOIS info, I always do it and I've seen people panic and buy privacy and it disappear within a refresh when I started trolling them with info.

Not sure how accurate it will be because it hasn't changed since 2005, you're supposed to inform them of any changes but I'm not sure many people do.

well, shit. He more than anybody deserves tbh

holy shit good job anarkiddie
i promote you to honorary comrade

...

You guys need to make up already.

Alright, how do I call those funny Australian numbers?

Please do not reveal where you got his number, where there is a discussion about him (leftypol) or anything relating to leftism. He will do some shit to other leftists. Just fuck with him.

howtocallabroad.com/australia/

seconded

...

This a trend that's been going on with right-wingers going after leftists and making fake accounts, using bots to dislike their content, doxxing, etc. Like what happened with democraticsocialism01

Record it if you can

I have appropriated this flag in the name of edginess and the lack of faith in humanity, the only thing tankie has done wrong is having a passive nuclear policy.

Who is the CRF? Is it a troll? Are we doing a false flag? Are we big guys now?

We'd be giving him first-hand experience on just how "mutually beneficial" the employer-employee relationship really is.

It's a channel that's debated with Xexizy and Yui before: youtube.com/watch?v=fK9OZzhSU5Q

Luis, I think is this guy who TheFinnishBolshevik has responded to: youtube.com/watch?v=LVCD7F2V7rM

What do you mean?

It happened to one of my personal friends a while ago as well.

To give some background, there's a political community on Instagram. I use it to shitpost mostly, but I'm bordering 4,000 followers, which makes me the 4th largest Marxist page on there, I think. May be lower. In the top 10 for sure.

So, a group of Alt-Righters and Fascists joined together to form a "Right Wing Death Squad" and doxxed numerous people. One kid doxxed was a DemSoc named Debsite. This happened months ago, and he has yet to return, for a very good reason, as almost all of his information was released. Then a couple of people were tipped off about another doxxing, one of these people is a close friend of mine. He had never posted much, and when he did it concerned Scottish Independence (As he is Scottish.) He rarely ever talked with right wingers, and only had 400 followers. Thankfully, somebody who was part of the RWDS told him what was about to happen and he left as quickly as possible. Thankfully, he is alright and wasn't doxxed, but they still have his information.

These RWDS are becoming more and more common, and more people are being victimized. It's part of the reason I want to leave most social media platforms and just stick to Holla Forums and other boards for awhile. But this is a trend that is becoming dangerously common.

What's up? Are we doxxing Adrian?

domainhistory.net/evokelabs.com

...

Because it said a few minutes ago I thought someone might have taken the "don't bring it back here" policy and ingeniously blamed another right winger.

kek

who let bob black into here, and when did it become heinous to smoke weed? "

Hi /leftpol/ I don't know why you're trying so hard to dox me. I'm here most days. I prefer to call myself a reactionary. Fascism (as shown in Soviet Russia and Not Socialist Worker Party) has always been leftypol inspired phenomenon, not right-libertarian.

I've always allowed for open discussion through my channel and Skype @ evokelabs as long as you're not a troll. But most of you guys prefer to attack people and send them to hospitals while wearing masks than have a conversation, so I think being a reactionary is a moral and necessary thing to do these days.

I don't think they are trying to dox you. This board doesn't get involved with that shit. But then, I dont have context for this stupid internet drama anyways

Its one retard that trying. This thread should have been pruned tbh but we have no moderation whatsoever

I give it a few weeks 'till he starts mentioning Pinochet in positive light.

Your lamp looks like those rolly cylinder things with the sticky tape around it that you use to get lint and pet hair off of nice clothes

Well it's okay. Everyone is wrong sometimes, I just don't get how you're wrong so much all the time.

anarchism is a mental disease

You say you want to have a discussion but you never listen.

in2opsec m8

Lose the hat, you'd be a deadringer for Lenin without it.

kek. The attitude of lefties is the single biggest recruiter for Holla Forums.

...

What sensitive souls you guys have!

Listen to what? The goal of the far-left is to remove private property because of Marxist reasons. I oppose that.

Don't see much of a discussion there goy.

Top kek

Do you seriously think Marx created socialism or?

Question, are you aware that we usually distinguish personnal property and private property, or do you think your toothbrush is private property?

"Wage Slavery", "Class Divides", "Exploration" are (((Marxist))) concepts that are used to justify red terrors.

No they aren't. Marx used them but Proudhon expanded on some of them before him.

*exploitation

You can take my toothbrush and my clothes comrade - they are worthless and I don't care about those.

I care about the expensive things in my life that I use in my business. Which, surprise surprise, are the things that thieves and thugs usually steal for themselves.

LMAO, "Class Divides" is not a specifically Marxist concept, unless you think that Ancient Romans etc. were unaware of the divide between plebeians, patricians, and slaves.

No, they aren't. Socialism is an old idea. Early forms of communal ownership were even practiced in Ancient Greece. You have no idea what you're talking about.

Plato literally talks about abolishing ALL property in The Republic because he noticed class dividing the population even then.

Well to be fair aside from having an intimate history with Islam through his Greek heritage, he probably hates them because he gets confused for them as well.

I remember a Greek couple got assaulted in Australia because they mistaken for Arabs.

Porky won't do that, unless it's some petit-beourgoise employer with strong views himself. A big company would just fire him before he could bring them into disrepute and they would definitely fire him if management aren't getting along with him, but have no legal grounds under which to fire him (ie he's doing his job).

Like what?

Are you just self employed? Do you hire people but still work in your own business? Do you just own it and do nothing yourself?

fuck meant to reply to

I understand there are overlaps in left/marx/communist philosophers throughout the centuries. If you have an issue with my semantics, I don't consider that an issue worth discussing.

I consider "class dives" to be a uniquely Marxist concept in the basis of using that to justify a revolution to achieve a policy against private property.

I didn't know that.

The physical means of production (computer, software, utility, space, profit, capital)

Yes

Sometimes.

I don't know of anyone who owns a business does "nothing" in it.

Yeah. Plato's Republic is basically a leftist technocracy run by philosopher kings.

If you own a business and you are the sole worker, that is fine. We have no problems with that. You are a self-employed worker. You get what you produce.

You can be a shareholder of a company, delegating the direction to a CEO, and even delegating the management of your capital todedicated consellors. So yes you can own a business, be wealthy thanks to it and not working at all.

This.

You can be a capitalist and make great amounts of wealth without doing anything at all. Wealth is made out of already existing wealth through things like rent, interest etc. That's parasitic behavior.

They can also lose all their money without doing anything at all. The vast amount of money made on stock markets is by placing shorts, but if the stock doesn't depreciate they could lose their entire fortune in a couple of minutes.

For every person making it big on the stock market there's a person or broker losing big.

Not including derivatives which are time bombs and a symptom of crony capitalism.

That's all very fine and good, but I sometimes work for other capitalists in my industry, who are better and more successful at what I do than myself. And I sometimes prefer working for those people, because it's pays more and it's easier.

In your system, you'd have him executed, his business would be expropriated, and the remaining ashes would be shared with the collective.

I prefer my way than your way.

That is the entrepreneur dream - to become so successful to a point where you can get a stable income without working. I don't see a problem with that. I'm actually trying hard to get there myself, so I can focus on my YouTube channel fulltime and not waste time with producing things people want. Do you have any tips for me?

In our system you get paid more because he isn't subtracting surplus( whatever little it may be), along with all the other workers as "his" company. If he provides a service more valuable than the others, he will receive greater compensation.

You're still getting ripped off

I don't support executing bourgeoise just for the sake of it. We want to abolish capital, not individual people.

This is why Keynesian social democracy is superior to neoliberalism and a better intermediate to socialism than armed struggle. By paying more money in tax you allow more people to spend on the market. It also allows entrepreneurs to make more as large corporations will pay more money into the system than you, making it more likely for consumers to put that money into your business.

Workers can organize themselves, and take their activity more at heart than people only here for the money working for people only here for profit (cf coops).
Money is not the only motivation to do things, the proof is that you'd rather make videos than doing your current job.
What do you think about cooperatives?

Is that before or after you abolish money?

The only thing that makes my paycheck go further, is more efficient economic production within the community. That means enabling capitalism.

"Surplus labour" is a Marxist fabrication used to justify red terror campaigns. I am paid what I'm worth, and I charge my clients based on the same principle - what the work is worth.

In your view, as long as I'm not earning 100% of what I'm outsourced as, I'm getting ripped off. In my own business, I make 100% of what I charge. But when I work for a capitalist, I make 50% of what he charges. The rest of the 45% he get is usually reinvested in his business - with the 5% as personal profit to the capitalist. I don't have a problem with this, because this framework allows for more efficient production within the community, and is non violent.

This is also known as capitalism.

Abolishing capital means abolishing their private property. They will resist, and I will join their side as reactionaries.

If you think workers can organise themselves and do a better job, then do it. Many worker do (such as myself). This is what call "Start ups" or "partnerships" or "sole traders".

This is compatible with free trade / capitalism, and doesn't justify red terrors.

I am well aware that money is not only a motivation to do things, but it is a significant motivator because money serves a purpose. I would rather make videos than do my current job, but until we live in a post-scarcity economy - I have to earn a living and do videos on the side.

Supporting communism will not change that.

Valid if it's voluntary.

Surplus labour is not a myth at all. You guys just cop out with the subjective theory to avoid any scientific analysis of economics. The TSSI does a good job of illuminating the logical validity of the LTV, as a single system.

Does it matter what type of collard paper you get your payment on?

There is no function the shareholders fulfill that couldn't be done by the workers themselves. The fact that they receive surplus proves its existence.

Capitalism had to go through a long string of violent revolutions toI in order to become the dominating mode of production. It's not like they just "voluntarily and freely traded" the nobility away.
No, they had to overthrow them because the feudal class had power and property to enforce their own interests.
There's no reason to expect a different set of rules applying this time around, that we can get democracy in the workplace through trade alone and that big business will simply leave us alone.

What do you mean by efficient exactly? Is producing a fuckton of goods, wasting a large part of them, and ruining the commons on the side efficient? Or do you jut consider that efficient means, increasing the capital as much as possible, dsregarding everything else? If the latter, you could have a point, but that would not make efficiency something to strive for in itself.

I do consider it a Marxist myth. It's a sophist trick that is used to anger the plebs to start a revolution against their bosses. And it's quite effective at doing that.

The subjective theory is the scientific analysis of economics. The most simplest way of explaining it that a diamond found on the ground is worth much more than a glass of water coming out a pipe.

Even though the water coming out of the pipe involves thousands of labourers and hard work to get it there, the diamond is worth more for just being a diamond. That is because value is subjective, and is not based on labour.

Maybe when I have some time I'll look into this, but Marxism ins't exactly renowned for being correct on economic issues.

It does. I wouldn't accept Zimbabwe, Venezuela, or Weimar Republic money.

You should just watch some of my videos. I recommend the one on Star Trek that goes into post-scarcity economy that reference Karl Marx.

There is no function the shareholders fulfill that couldn't be done by the workers themselves. The fact that they receive surplus proves its existence.

Shareholders invest in a company with their company. Workers are free to invest as shareholder as well if they have money. Some workers are additionally paid in shares to boaster their salary. I don't see the problem here.

It's usually the reverse. Russia had a violent revolution to impose communism, but then a peaceful one to bring back capitalism. Revolutionary Catalonia had a violent revolution to impose communism, but then a somewhat peaceful democratic one before Franco took back control.

Are you talking about the French revolution in particular? Most countries killed/exiled their kings. Some of them went to communism, other's went to capitalism.

Through the state. I'm an ancap, I'm against the state.

Well I've created my own workplace. Big business (such as google) are actually helping me. The people who are not leaving me alone is the state, and communists who want my means of production.

The division of labour. Specialisation. Capital investment. Free Trade. Private Property rights. Those all components of capitalism that focus on efficiently and production.

Waste is a sign of bad business and results in the loss of profit. I don't think anyone wants or aims for watse.

As for ruining the commons, I assume you mean environmental issues such as climate change. In my country, the government doesn't allow for nuclear energy because of environmental lobbyist. If you have a better way of powering engines without oil - we'd love to know.

I don't understand your statement here.

we live in an era of auto correct he should use it

Delicious, this bait tastes like cheeseburger!

why are you more for capitalism then anarchism ?

ever read marx ?

...

...

Regardless that has nothing to do with surplus value, that's when workers are paid with a wage for work.

...

Australian spelling

I'm an ancap.

Capitalism is consistent with anarchism, as I don't accept bosses to be a form of coercive hierarchy - but a voluntary one.

Him and others

I have shares. I guess I own a very very small part of those companies. But not in the same way that in own my company and run everything myself here. Most of the shares have lost value .I don't think the two are comparable and I don't see the issue.

Nice meme :^)

ok

...

Kek
reuters.com/investigates/special-report/usa-buybacks-cannibalized/

Russia wasn't capitalist before the revolution, it was overwhelmingly feudalist. There was no "return to capitalism".

This of course ignore the french revolution, the American revolution, the 1840 revolutions, the Meiji restoration and a whole slew of other violent revolutions that were necessary in order to make capitalism dominate over feudalism.

Now I don't hold that against them, but capitalism wasn't the result of voluntary trade simply out competing the old order, there was a lot of revolutionary behind that. This is why worker coops cannot simply outcompete the existing order. It has never been done before, so why would it happen now?

...

Sure, but actual capitalists who know what they're doing aren't. They need and want a state to maintain and protect their private property. If that is removed it will simply be replaced by private security and company rule that will be a state in all but name. It might even be worse as it as no formal obligation to the population at all.

You are wrong.

Whatever remained of feudal stuff got left behind in 19th century. By 1917 Russia was thoroughly capitalist, only autocratic Czar remained.

The first threes are not specific capitalists notions
Private property rights have fuck all to do with efficiency and production.
Free Trade is a huge waster of ressources because it makes importing goods from the other side of the world more profitable than buying something from locals markets. The option wasting more fuel becomes preferable to the one consuming less ressources. In scarcity context, i wouldn't call that efficient.

Not neccessary, take the costs of production in consideration. If their is a way of producing 100 goods per day with 0% waste for 100 dollars and a way to produce 1000 of thoses same goods with 50% waste for 100 dollars, wich is more profitable?
More obvious is overfishing, fishers without regulations are looting the oceans unil the only thing left are jelyfishes.
If efficiency is creating more capital and the rest doesn't matter, you ends up with situations like letting people die in factories is OK because it's more profitable to hire new people than invest in security.

There. Much better and more thorough explanation:

Development of Capitalism in Russia (Lenin, 1899)
marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1899/devel/index.htm

Russia was largely an agrarian backwaters with very little actual capital and industry. This is why Lenin and Stalin had to go through so much trouble creating such industry. Because it largely did not exist.

Which was enforced by a monarchy - not exactly a free capitalistic environment.

(((reuters)))

I accept that there is shady shit going down in crony capitalism/ corporatism land, but the answer is not to dismantle private property rights.

I can't read this article for you and give a valid reply.

I know.

The end of soviet union in the 90s gave a return to a more freer market

Resulted in republic

Resulted in independence

Resulted in nationalism

Resulted in political change in Japan

The above (apart from end of soviet) are not capitalist in nature, but changed the nature of the state.

It depends on the country you're talking about and the situation behind it. The countries have different economic policies behind it, none of the above when to a complete capitalistic environment, but a mixed economy environment.

Workers start their own business all the time. Some of them become really good at it and become bigger. The largest one (Google, Apple) started with small worker coops in a garage and grew from there to be multinationals. No revolutions or opposition from larger companies unless you count the state.

I don't see the issue.

There's a big difference in private security and the state. If you don't recognise that, you have bigger issues.

No they are not. But they are maximised in the private ownership of the mean of production.

I think it's crucial. I need the means of production to do my work. If it's not there because some comrade wants it, then I can't do my work.

Why would I throw away 500 goods of it if I paid $50 for it? Wouldn't I sell it for the next guy who wanted 100 of the goods it for $50? If I sold the 100 goods for $50 to the next guy, I'd be the easiest millionaire in history.

I don't think you have any business sense, which is why Marxism appeals to you.

That's a problem with having things in common/public ownership. That problem is maximised in a common ownership society (communism).

No one wants to see people die in factories.

The question is not about the presence of actual industry (yes, Russia was agrarian and had little industry), but whether it's economic system was Capitalist or Feudal.

The answer is: it was Capitalist. Peasants sold their crops and paid money to their landlords.

...

What you use is yours, it's personal property. What you own but other peole use so you can make a profit out of it without using it yourself is private property.

Imagine we're talking about tomatoes. You have the first method producing 100 edible tomatoes, the second one producing 500 edible tomatoes and 500 non edible tomatoes. But both cost the same.
With the first production method you can sell 100 tomatoes, and with the second you can sell 500 tomatoes with the same money invested.
The more wasteful process can potentially become the more profitable.

If commons are democratically owned, others logics than market logic are taken into account. With other fishermen seen as co workers rather than competitors, no reason to loot like crazy.

So you agree the increase of capital is not the supreme goal.

Maybe not in the near term, but we can introduce socialized capital and a greater amount of worker ownership.

How would bosses enforce their private property rights?

That would mean hookers at a brothel are private property, as other people use that for profit and so their vaginas must be expropriated for the goal of communism.

Or you could stop being an authoritative fascist and let people own what they legitimately own.

Yes, the farmer would probably choose the later. So what?

This is not how farming actually works, as farmers use tractors to harvest as much as they can to maximum production and reduce watse.

I don't understand. When things are democratically owned, the incentive is to loot that resource before anyone else does. The only way to minimise that is to privatise it.

Depends on the individual. Some people here just want to see the world burn.

I'd prefer if you didn't.

You mean, how do bosses stop ravished horde of Marxist reds from interfering with his business? I find semi automatic weapons works well.

You're the fascist

So the wealthy will have private armies to ensure nobody infinges on their property?

You have no idea what fascism means.

Daily reminder this is the perfect ancap future.

The preferred term is reactionary. I'm reacting.

Or most likely a private security company who are experienced at physically removing antifa communists from private property for a small fee.

It means Donald Trump

So an army. You're basically advocating for a return to feudalism with CEOs replacing the lords. You don't see a problem with having a group of unaccountable wealthy individuals in control of an armed group? What's to prevent them from abusing this absurd amount of concentrated power?

Anyway, you're the polar opposite of an anarchist, you're a fascist.

No. The hookers are workers. The brothel would be their property instead of the pimp's.

There is more to farming than harvesting cereals you know? Beside reducing waste have a cost too, the capitalist have to take that into consideration. In egg factories, male chicks are just thrown away and cruhed alive, it's cheaper than letting them live or screening eggs to abort males. If you leave ethical considerations aside, this is still not the more efficient solution ressource wise, but still the more profitable. So capitalism is not automatically efficient ressources wise.

Indeed you do not understand. Under communism, you have no competition, there is no "before everyone else does". You could have a point with market socialism, but workers tending to consider profit as a tool for their well being rather than an end for itself, they can take other parameters into account so the pressure on the ocean would be still less than what we currently have.

more like shareholders replacing the lords, CEO would be more like intendents.

The economy is not fixed, it's usually created and grows. If you're getting yoru economic information from someone like (((Tom Tommorrow))) then you're not fit for discussions on economic matters

So whatever can defend private property rights. A lock. An alarm. A gun. A guard dog. The mafia. An origination that specialises in this service.

> You're basically advocating for a return to feudalism with CEOs replacing the lords.

No, I'm not basically advocating that.

You mean like the state? Or the Democrats? Or CNT during the Spanish revolution? Or communist militia? Or the Bolsheviks?

I'm fine with wealthy individuals in control of an anrmed group if it respects freedom, order and private property rights. How else are we supposed to defending ourselves from people like you?

You guys are legitimately trying to track me down so antifa can send me to the hospital. If I need an army to stop that, then I will endorse an army.

We stop paying them and support someone who better protects the communities interests.

Semantics. Property term is ancap reactionary.

I don't go for brothel for the property, I go to brothels for vaginas. Under your system, vaginas are expropriated for the goal of communism, as they are the private property used for profit.

To the people in those industry, it is, as they are the ones making those decisions - not you and I. If you have a better case to make, make it to them - not to me.

None of this justifies communism.

There are usually long lines in communism. You need to line up to get something from the communal stores before everyone else does. That is competition.

Ok

Trying to convince a money with a gun not to shoot me is less efficient than shooting him first, mateypetatey.

All of those revolutions expropriated property and power from the labd-owning nobility and gave it to capital-owning bourgeoisie. In all those cases, capitalism was imposed forcefully rather than voluntarily traded into dominance. This is exactly my point about work-place democracy.
Capitalism didn't displace feudalism non violently and voluntarily, so why would socialism?

Yeah. Exactly. You want to create a state apparatus. You're no anarchist.

They'll respect their freedom to subjugate the worker. They'll respect the order that doesn't threaten their power. They'll respect private property rights only as far as it will benefit them. Eminent domain will be the law of the land.

What do you do when the firm has a monopoly on a valuable resource or necessity?

So police? How are you not a feudal Lord at that point?

I'm not sure what "communist militia" meant, but Bolsheviks (i.e. appointed revolutionary executives - as in the "CEO", not "executioner") were very accountable.

You are either insane or trolling.

Then maybe stop calling yourself an anarchist when you want a state, you just want it for yourself.
That's fair enough. That's perfectly within your interests. But it's not anarchism.

Unless you're a feshlight afficionado, you still have to deal with the people around thoses vaginas. Their vagina is a part of them. Fucking you is their job.

People. Are. Not. Property.
What part of this are you failling to understand? You can't expropriate people out of their bodies, this is nonsense. A tool can be private property, the hand that use it is not.

In capitalism, the capitalist do as he please, thanks captain obvious! But the point was to show was that bigger profits =/= efficiency There CAN be overlapse betwenn the two, but not neccessarly. Efficiency is not an argument of favor of capitalism.

Remider that the word breadline appeared under capitalism.

I'm not interested in shooting you unless you want to shoot me or take my stuff - which is the communist position.

So you're actually the guy with a money with a gun who wants to shoot me, except you have no money.

I don't recognise the difference between those two groups. In your revolution, the capital-owning bourgeoisie will have their power and property expropriated to the proletaria . The proletarian will then become the land owning nobility, which will create a new class of people who have power and property, and a new class of proletarians that don't.

You can start a work place democracy under capitalism, no one gives a shit about how you manage your business. until you go into another and start ordering them around.

Because you need to use force to displace the capitalist class

.>>839786

I really don't. That's what you guys want to do through worker coops and not call it a state as in Revolutionary Catalonia.

"Subjugation" to leftpol means getting paid less than 100% of what someone is outsourced as.

You don't know what freedom or subjugate means.

Or the order that respects private property rights, as that's what's most people want.

Yes, that's usually how a service works.

I thought that's what you guys advocate? Expropriating private property for public use?

Use them, as they are probably the best - like google or youtube.

Police is a monopoly. I advocate for a list of services I can choose from from a competitive market. Police take hours to respond to a call because they are the monopoly.

As in Spain's civil war.

And the were Bolsheviks accountable if were on on their side, and not part of any other faction that disagreed with them (such as being a capitalist). Or you might get accidentally caught up in a purge.. Or get shipped off to Siberia. Or you might have supported the Tsar. Or were Christian. But yes, very accountable if you weren't any of those things.

Pic related

I don't want a state. I want to hire someone to keep plebs of my property and to protect myself from violent mobs and are triggered by my capitalist ways. Is that too much to ask?

Sure it is.

What? I mean what wealthy group supported or controlled the anarchist? That hilarious!

During Russian Civil War that's what it basically was.

Makhno's gangs were protecting wealthy landowners from the evil Red (and occasional White).

Do we have an example of proper Anarchism in action?

Yep. That's full-on Communism right here.

Yep. The terrors of Communism.

I stay by my statement: either insane or trolling.

How is this different from a lord paying mercenaries to keep his serfs in check? What the fuck is a State for you?

...

I think you mean workers and peasants user

Not him giving orders, obviously.

No. I mean kulaks. They were no peasants, despite all attempts to portray them as such.

And workers were pretty much in the "shoot first" category, as was "intelligentsia". Makhno was a bit Pol Pot-ish in that respect.

So what? I don't care about the people around it, I care about the vagina. That's the private property to be expropriated under your system.

Vaginas are property. The people attached are also property. They are the most important part of an economy - as they are needed to run the mean of production, and sometimes are the means of production (hookers)

So people are not property… even those they are valuable, take up space, are bought and sold, have skills, run the means of production, are the means of production, need to be maintain and ekpt healthy - they are not property.

When you expropriate property, you are not talking about personal property. You are taking about private property. That is, property that used by others for a profit. Like vaginas. But not vaginas because they are on people. And people are not property. Unless they are capitalists, in which case, you can expropriate that property.

It's always fun bringing this point up. The amount of mental gymnastics Marxist go through to justify their obvious pro-rape policies is delightful everytime.

Bigger profit is mostly done through efficiently. Happy?

During world war 2 where things were rationed? In Europe, German civilians were getting firebombed by the allies and raped by the reds during that same time.

Good thing the allies adopt capitalism, otherwise things would look just as bleak.

Soviet Satellite countries that had the same economic policy were in the same situation. Like Venezuela is currently in

Find another scapegoat

More like a lord paying mercenaries to keep barbarians out of his home. Capitalists usually pay serfs directly to keep them in check, not pay mercenaries to keep the self in check.

The monopoly of force that doesn't respect private property rights.

Yep. is full-on Fascist. It doesn't matter how Anarchist you are, eventually you will arrive at Fascism, regardless of ideology.

Choose one and only one.

Also, I'd like to remind you, that UK found them in the same situation as well. Not to mention, even US had the same crap going even if it was less intense - Nylon Riots as an example.

You sure must be an enjoyable fellow for your gf.

Am i arguing with an anarchist or a slaver?

The capitalist is not a private property you fucking retard. Factories are not a part of himself, he do not surgically fuse with them. What shit are you smoking?

The current state respects private property rights. So why are you an anarchist?

Ancap reactionary is the proper term for the third time.

You guys call everyone you don't like fascist, because you're sophists and poor at language, which stems from being poor at critical thinking.

Not true Socialism™ / Not True Communism®

The same argument everytime. I even said this in my video.

The purposefully results of the Blitz, designed to disrupt private property and the market - which it did.

SIlk came from Japan. Japan and US was at war. Supply couldn't meet demand, therefore, let's go full communism?

They love it. I'm not cucked.

It's called "salary".

TIL: "Eat the rich" is not to be taken literally (or is it?)

No before ww2 when the Great Depression hit and the people needed to start breadlines so nobody will get hungry
>In Europe, German civilians were getting firebombed by the allies and raped by the reds during that same time.
Oh yeah like the German army was any better while killing jews, slavs, gypsies, homosexuals, etc. while destroying many cities and rural areas around Europe, almost every country usually has a shit military record, big surprise.
Soooo the Soviets adapted capitalism?

They respect private property so much that if I don't play land tax, income tax, follow their regulation in my private business or do drugs in my private home, I go to jail. Such respect for private rights - wow!

Regulations and taxes aren't opposed to private property rights.

...

Daily reminder that workers dont give a fuck about any abstract concept like surplus value.

Also personal property is property used for consumption (The End of Economic Value) and private property is property that is used to create a revenue. (Stock+Revenue=Capital)

Has anyone in this thread Read Sismondi, Say or Ricardo?

You mean the Great Depression which the Fed created (and had admitted to create) when it outlaw the gold currency and promote anti-capitalistic monetary policies? Similar anti-capitalistic policies that created the GFC? I guess if ((Chomsky)) and Zizek tell you to blame capitalism, you'll blame capitalism.

Good thing USA and UK had an industrial revolution when it did. In some parts of Europe that didn't have an industrial revolution, some (((people))) used it as an excuse to start a full scale commie revolution - where millions would later die in a result in WW2 - which is right before Mao and Stalin's millions

You mean the (((holocaust)) where (((6million))) jews were turned into soap and lampshades? You know that whitey must continue to pay repercussions to the Jewish people who pushed for communism into Germany, and protect Irseal from it's enemy do you Goyim? Better not talk about that gentile, we could go to prison.

Right after it fell in the 90s.

Yes they are. I can tell because there's a gun in my face. Do you want me shot?

3spooky4me

So whats your point none of these two things are connected.

Yes, they are. The Fascist is absolutely correct in this respect.

You don't know what a spook is.

How is force antithetical to Private property? Private property can only be enforced with a gun.

...

That its kidna funny that you guys are argueing with him while clearly not understanding yourself what you preach on economic stuff except lower then wiki tier marxism.
Its all hot air and he allready agrees to disagree with the notion that his interest (he utilizes private property to do his shit) is in contradiction with the interest of the communists who desire to abolish private property.

And by instead of having a monopoly of force you got a market of force of PMC's offerin g their force to enforce private property.

...

Regulations and taxes don't preclude you from owning property. They may oppose individual owners interests but that doesn't mean it challenges the concept of private property.

#FreeEvalion

It is widely debated on how the Great Depression started, to me it was basically just a bunch of loans and the stock market crash.
………. Yup your a fascist, and I hate Israel anyways.

Mean't for

It's the truth. Why do you think Makhno operated only within kulak-dominated Eastern Ukraine?

No. As ML I have a very specific definition of Fascism. And you happen to fit it.

Videos are for the illiterate.

And you really should educate yourself on political economy. Venezuela was (well, is) capitalist state that introduced some Socialist reforms. That's it. It is still Capitalist. Bolivarians are revisionists, who thought that they can have smooth transition to Socialism without actually controlling means of production and changing economy to Socialist. LARPers.

This is too tinfoil for me.

You tell me. As far as I got your logic, if there are long lines, it must be communist conspiracy. Market cannot be wrong, eh?

Also, nylon is not silk. It was US-produced.

The main argument for Marxism isn't whether private property rights are inalienable, you owning a house doesn't play into this. It's too broad of a category.

The main problem is the owning of Capital and having other people extracting it for you. For Marxism owing capital is:

1. Inherently exploitative due to LTV

2. Not as productive and cost effective as communism and a planned economy.

Yes, it does.

If someone else decides how exactly your property can be used - it is not exactly your property at this point. Property means having full set of rights in relation to the thing.

Introduction of tax on land means that your land is not yours anymore, but is being lent to you by the government.

Seems like an anarchist position to me.

Regulations and taxes are there to ensure the sustainability and stability of the state, without which Capitalism cannot survive as it would it descend into neo-feudalism and civil war.

And no legally taxes don't mean you posses "rented land" by the state, it means you give back to the state in what the state has provided to the effect of prospering and stabilizing society, from roads to welfare, to running water.

Bourgeois Laws of the state go hand in hand with the protection of capital, every true Marxist knows this.

Ben Bernanke (Ex Chairmen of the Fed) has written official government report where he links the policies of the Fed which resulted in the great depression. That's the only justification I need.

You hate Israel? That must mean you're the facist. Don't you know all anti-Zionist are fascists there goy?

It doesn't change the ultimate fact of property not being private anymore.

You do realize that the same thing can be explained in several things and all of them might be correct?

Even if you received something in return, you still parted with part of your private property.

And the power of the state grows, as more and more rights on private property have to be sacrificed to ensure a few more years of survival of Bourgeoisie.

Abolishment of private property on Means of Production is coming regardless of how you justify it.

...

...

...

The biggest anti-zionists have always been on the Left, even during Marx's time, and all the way to teh Soviet Union who supported the Arab states against Israel. And the far left is alone in supporting the PLO and the Palestinians.

The biggest Zionist fan boys today are the far-right, Neocons, Trump, Front National, Geert Wilders etc.

Just having taxes does not make it socialist.

Socialism requires Democracy. Which is where Revolution comes in.

...

Soviets supported Israel, before it went full capitalist.

Anyone you don't like, or anyone who doesn't agree with your commie ways is a F A S C I S T.

Fucking white males… seriously.

wew lad you're just 2kewl4skool

Heard the same thing from Libertarian Socialist Rants and his cucked fans.

Mah State Capitalism.

Mah not True Socialism.

Mah Communism has never been achieved.

Boring, old, and degenerate. Pic related.

"If only they did this one thing that people are supposed to do, then we'd be all living in the utopia of post-scarcity True Communism™.

Let's try it one more time. Just give up all your property and your business. The only thing you have to lose is your chains. Trust me goy."

Bombing things disrupts economy. See Hiroshima for more.

It's supply and demand. In communism, there's usually not enough supply fo demand because of communist economic policies.

It generally happens when you have a totalitarian state that shoots or imprisons capitalists who try to increase supply and meet demand through their own entrepreneurial skills, such as the case in Venezuela

Oh wait… mah not true socialism. My bad.

"During World War II, Japan stopped using supplies made out of silk, and so the United States had difficulty importing silk from Japan. Eventually, the U.S was unable to import any silk. So, Du Pont thought of an idea to convince the army that nylon is a much more effective material than silk. Du Pont was able to convince the army, and nylon fabric became increasingly popular because of its elasticity and shrink-proof, moth-proof material."

You can't even write anything intelligible at this point, user. Better stop.

Wow - you have more in common with capitalists and globalist (((George Soros))) than me! Sure you're not a fascist?

Stormfront are the biggest Zionist fan boys.

Leftpol always delivers.

No need to. I'll have inherited a trillin dollars. I'll just buy you out and everything that you own. Your life will be in my hands. You'll end up in the streets because that's what I want, I have the power to do that afterall. If you try to crawl back up from the gutter, I won't allow it and make sure you stay in your condition, because i have the money to make it happen. And there's nothing you can do about it because we live in an anarcho-capitalist society, where money rules. No room for petty emotions. if you die in the streets, I don't give a fuck. It's your fault for not working harder :^)

Ok. It's been fun.

I'll take "more Marxist lies that leftypol believes in" for $100 Alex.

Taxes aren't a socialist concept.

The property is still private. You own it and profit from it. How is that not private?

Money and profit are not private property.

What rights? The right to pollute drinking water that other people use? The right to leach off the apparatus that allows the capitalist to thrive?

With money, you can buy power. Money is by function a way of buying stuff from people, and with most people, almost everything they can give has a price. This means that money is a way of coercing people to give up certain things, and therefore it is a form of power.

Sure. I have some money, I'll try that get some power.

Whoops. Can't buy a gun
Whoops. Can't buy a knife
Whoops. Can't buy a tazer
Whoops. Can't buy private security
Whoops. Can't buy drugs

What power can I buy with my money again?

I guess I can buy a car? Oh wait, don't have a license or insurance - that's odd.

Guess I'll just wait here until I get raped by African immigrants our government has gracefully let in, or until antifa comes to my house you guys have doxxed them with.

Because money is power.

I people can be bought and sold (cf, )
then money is quite indeed a big power.

It's a matter of quantity silly. Just like a guns are power, but you'll not going very far with one bullet.
You have little money so you have little power. When you are rich as fuck, you can get around laws.

So 1% control the government therefore end money and cpaitalism

Jesus christ, this is the perfect example of why nobody takes ancaps seriously. You can't even recognize the difference between a machine and a person, or a good and a service.

This is like saying communism promotes enslaving masseuses and actors because they do things rather than produce things.

triggering tbh

also disturbing amount of meme brackets used

Enjoy your ban, faggot.

so if i have a shitload of money i can't pay someone to shoot someone else

i'm pretty sure if you can do that then you're kinda powerful

Thanks, I will.

Property is property lad.

"In political/economic theory, notably socialist, Marxist, and most anarchist philosophies, the distinction between private and personal property is extremely important. Which items of property constitute which is open to debate. In some philosophies, such as capitalism, private and personal property are considered to be exactly equivalent."

kill yourself nobody should be banned for having different views even if it's extremely shitty

Key word: shoot. That's getting shoot with a piece of metal - not being shot buy a wad of cash. Pieces of metals are very cheap.

Given that capitalism created that situation in the first place, that is at least a good reason to consider alternatives…

I disagree, he should keep posting, it's entertaining.
I learned that people are things and that tomatoes are harvested with tractors.

Except they do because its money they are not paid.

My alternative is keep free market, get rid of government. Not enable vanguard government party, destroy feel market, and prey for true communism.

if you pay a man to gun another man down, is that not power ?

i mean you just ended another man's life just by flashing some money in another guy's face and saying "here's $500,000 go shoot that guy for me"

jej, Ayncraps, not even once.

Nice try tumblr.

Ok, you got me on that one.

How I see it:

Pay a niglet to gun down another man
He runs off with your money
Never see him again

OR

Pay a niglet to gun down another man
Niglet shoots that man with gun
Marxist faults the crime with money
Liberals fault the crime with guns
Everyone else faults the crime with niglet

Marxist: "He diddu do nothing. It's the capitalist fault. End Capitalism now."

How it really works:

Governments forces population to pay taxes through violating private property rights
Government shoots you if you resist or provide the same service
Ancaps says "There's a better way"
Liberals says "Taxes are the price you pay to live in a civil society"
Marxist say "Government protects your private property rights to enforce class war"

There's not end to this ride.

Happens to the best of us. You should have brought farming simulator while it was on sale.

I think you mean property is a spook.

If I took a penny that you owned and mixed it up with 19 identical pennies that you didn't own, would you have a better chance to pick your penny from a lineup than a d20 would?

You wouldn't because there is no real thing called property ownership. It's a meaningless and abstract social concept invented to keep people from killing each other over who has more rocks than who back when resources were scarce.

Stamp on Ancaps

No, It's the rich's guarantee whenever they fuck up.

An oligarchy is the eventuality of every capitalist system.

Identical penny represent the same value. Money by its design is that's it's indivisible.

I'll try using that line when I court my next women for her vagina (her property ownership). Let you know how that goes ya big spook.

Brb, stocking up on heroine and cocaine to sell to the masses.

It's a free market and I'm just selling what the people want, after all.

Well you've got to pay for it so I assume she'll let you say whatever you want as long as you pay for the hour.

They say no sometimes.

Don't they teach security culture in your infoshops or what

This is fucking war, if you haven't noticed. I want greasy fascist fucks afraid to leave the house.

But I guess liberal hobbyists are fine with Nazis on the street. Gotta protect >muh freeze peach

You are from Australia, right? How do you explain that life quality in Australia for the working class is significantly better than in the USA thanks to a reasonable minimum wage and Medicare?

How come that all societies that had more or less unchecked capitalism degenerated into mass poverty and general drop in life quality? You realize that if you create a huge precariat with low purchasing power, your AnCap economy will eventually deflate because of lack of purchasing power and and absence of soft skills?

You consider not killing people to be personnal responsibility which is more than understandable from an ethical point of view, but if you starve and someone offer you money to stab someone, you might compromise with your beliefs. And even if you don't, the customer can find someone to do it, so in the end, money is still a way to get what you want. Isn't it power?
Beside, you know professionals killers are a thing right? And not only in the military, they also exist outside governement authority ie drug cartels.

We have a freer market here than America believe it or not.

Also, whites are still the majority here. We are not over run with Niglets and Hispanics. Smart Asian also make up the demographic. But that demographics is changing.

Things would be better with ancap in Australia though.

What are you refering to here?

That's not how it works.

Context matters retard, shitposting on an anonymous imageboard is not the same as going full Cristal Night.
No platform is counterproductive, especially nowadays when absolute control of information is not possible. You only legitimize your opponents as martyrs.

You even get rejected by whores? Man you must be an ugly motherfucker with a shit personality.

Mission accomplished. I'm afraid to leave my house. Can you leave me and my property alone now?

>but if you starve and someone offer you money to stab someone, you might compromise with your beliefs.

I'd rather starve that kill someone for money. TBH But that's just me. I've never been in that situation so I can't tell, and the only way I will be is if we have a class/race war.

I don't want that, you guys do.

I think you overstate the power of money significantly TBH. Money is the medium of exchange, that's it.

I know. But ending money and enabling communism would just make problems worse, not better.

Such is life

People call you a fascist because your views might not be inherently fascist in the classical sense (incorporating all classes into the Fasces towards a common goal through force and aesthetics), ordo-liberal societies tend to need an authoritarian fascist dictator to stop people from trying to overthrow the material conditions. And from my experiences, AnCaps rather like to have their Pinochet than worker control.

Maybe you plebs should stop trying to overthrow material conditions if you want to stop reactionary fascists?

Read Machiavelli, particularly the chapter on mercenaries, you dumb fa ggot.

that makes no sense

Well, I don't know. How do you even define private property?

Because right now it boils down to "I have paper that says that it's my property, but I'm not actually allowed to do anything with it".

Good for you, i mean it.

I don't wan't to kill anyone. I would prefer convincing capitalists to give up private property rather than straight up sent themto gulag. I would like to achieve socialism with democratic reforms, but while i'm at it, we could all sing Kumbaya around a campfire and make love like there is no tomorrow.
Si vis pacem, para bellum

The power of money depends largely on the economic ad political system in which it exists. It was less influent when people were living in the fear of God, but when private property rights are the alpha and omega of political foundation, your money is a good reflect of your actual power.

And? Your Ideology is to privatize public welfare and healthcare, is it not?

I'm from Germany and our cucked SocDem government 15 years ago had the glorious idea to partly privatize the pension scheme. When you replace pay-as-you-go financing within the social security system with a profit-based competition, you get shit. This one private insurance that they tried to push doesn't even give you the money back you pay in unless you become 95 or something. That's not even ineffective anymore - that is a fucking scam.

You just rather have your labor slaves in Bangladesh or something, where you don't have to look at them.
But we are not talking immigration here, and yes, I'm against mass immigration and so is the majority of leftypol since it's just a tool to import cheap labor and corrupted by IdPol shit.

In general, countries with welfare systems do better in terms of life quality than countries without it.

Except it is. Capitalists just never think long-term and then eventually shamelessly ask some coercive neoliberals or SocDems for help, you can see that with all the big businesses supporting Clinton

Pic related, it's your future if you dare to step outside your basement, you greasy, prematurely balding fuck

are you another one of those people who are all "if they're wrong, argue so they look like an idiot, don't ban them!"

because you can't argue against reactionary ideologies because they are inherently illogical: they are emotional ideologies that uses muh fee-fees to spread rather than logic, and the "racial supremacy" pseudoscience is just a way to make it seem more legitimate

tell somebody that "capitalism isn't working because we are automating out all the jobs and the system is unable to adapt to that, we need to move to something better" and they will just get nervous and reluctant because that means the system has to change and that's scary and hard, and its hard to point a finger at a tangible thing or group and say "that's the bad guy!"

tell them that "americans are losing jobs to violent immigrants, and we need to elect a strong leader to take care of it", and you imply that we can keep the current system which means people don't have to leave their comfort zones, and you can point a finger at a group and say "that's the bad guy!" and also "but if we elect this dude and give him power, he will take care of all of our problems for us!"

you don't fight fascism with logic, you beat it down

...

They'll become martyrs only if people will learn about them. And even then …

Have you considered suicide? You're never getting a gf and the orcs and commies will soon fuck up everything so you might as well get out before Commisar Jamal makes you his sissy. I recommend heroin od, you'll die sleeping and won't feel any pain.

I've been doing this for years and years and I've heard argument there is to be made for communism/socialism.

It's never going to happen.

There's no arguments you could make that will make me rationally give up the things I've built for myself, and deny others that same right through capitalism.

The only way it can be done, and the only way it's historically ever been done, is through violence. Either from the state, militias, or revolutions.

You seem like an honest straight up good guy. I hope you watch some of my presentations on my channel to see if I can convince you of the opposite case.

Yes.

I don't know your countries economic policies. But your country economic policies should be the least of your concern at the moment. We are getting report after report of terrorist attacks from your nation, and our government/people in Australia are shitting themselves watching it happen in Europe.

Yes, we trade and import things from other countries. We pay Bangladesh for their services. We're both happy.

Uh, I'd be more concorned about terrorist attack than cheap labor, but that's just me.

Yes, single mother and welfare whores have a better life quality than countries without werfare. Except if you're the capitalist or the working class that is forced to support your enemies through it - then it's not so great.

It's not how it works.

And you wonder why reactionary fascist exist

Thanks for the tip. I'll think about it.

Why Fascist gets Marx better then most "Left" do?

ancrapism in an infantile disorder

???????????????????????

Yes exactly that's just you private business couldn't care less about it cheap non stop labour is their ownly aim to keep costs down and pay the workers less.

Can some Sydney comrade please go fuck this guy up?

You sure you don't want to switch to a better Marxism version?

I don't live there anymore, I'm in Melbourne. You're getting ten year old domain information.

Step 1: Ask for a letter for domain retrieval to be sent.
Step 2: Go to previous address and pick up letter.

Fuck the NAP.

I'm living 2 blocks away from that mall that some aryan Persian shot up and I don't give a fuck. I oppose mass immigration as I said, but I'm more worried about fucking NATO pushing into Russia or Neocons destabilizing the Middle East.

Lil bit of an oversimplification? The West enforces free trade on the Third World countries to ruin their domestic economy and their politicians are in the pockets of the big business. There is more to that.

Im a student and while some guy with an axe in a train in Würzburg doesn't affect me, the hilariously low minimum wage I get in my students job does.

Pensioners that worked hard all their life in a honest job are not fucking welfare queens. You don't know how many of them collect bottles out of trash cans for deposit money to keep their head over the water because the genius capitalists decided a private pension schemes would be a good thing.

You don't even have to do that, just write to the provider that you can't reach him based on the whois and they will suspend it until he updates it.

topkek

You don't care if your own people are murdered by foreigners in the name of Allah, but you care about low minimum wage in your student job?

I don't know what to say.

I'd say the Middle East is plenty destablised, that's why they are in your country killing your peers.

No, it's because they are low skilled workers with low wages. It's cheaper to ship things from there on mass, than it is to hire local workers because of things like the minimum wage wage laws (Australia has the highest).

People are usually paid what they worth. If you want a higher wage, you need specialised knowledge to serve your community with. I recommend the digital industry if you're stuck.

Pensioners usually save a bit of their money throughout their lives in money management programs known as superannuation. If your government sold your people out, which governments usually do, then that's a problem with the state, and not capitalism.

Yeah, no shit, hence the sad sarcasm further in my post.

No offense, but i honestly prefer books for arguments. my collection for strictly Austrian economics and Ancap litterature is a bit short atm, so i wouldn't mind a few more.

I brought private whois years ago. You are seeing a cached version.

We have meetups in Melbourne every week. Just find me there.

Okay, I'm game. Where and when exactly?

FTFY. Shouldn't you be trading Bitcoin or whatever pseudo-fascists lolberts so in their spare time?

This, tbh fam. I remember in my Holla Forums days reading the Turner Diaries, and the one thing that still sticks out to me about that book is the idea that the masses will never revolt as long as the fridge is full of cheap microwave dinners and beer and the TV is on.

Hundreds of thousends died in Iraq in the name of capital, should I not care about them? If the horrors of global capitalism inflicted on the world come to my doorstep, I'm ready.

Yeah, that's correct.

Typical AnCap logic. Because the minimum wage is higher in Australia (it's not the highest btw) we must reduce the wages in our home country instead of just allowing tariffs in the Third World to balance it out!
Capital > Humans, I see

If you want meritocracy like that, you should start killing all the rich kids in my class with the Lacoste shirts and the boat shoes that do nothing to the community and just leech off their parents money. That's why private property sucks

What makes you think it wasn't capitalist influence that made my government selling the people out in the first place? This is what AnCaps don't get, the state and capitalism is not a contradiction

...

yeh, I mean, what IS lobbying.

...

It's not scientific. It's a crude way to combine use value and exchange value. It stops at "this is worth as much as I want it to be", without taking into account ANYTHING common between commodities, however qualitatively different they may be.

It's funny that you subjective theory advocates can ever only talk about water and diamonds, and not say, a pound of potatoes and a pack of protein bars.

And I mean that in saying in a communist society, you wouldn't care if it was "money" or vouchers or some other sort of exchange value, it fulfills the same purpose. You can buy what your labour is worth.

(hint you aren't an anarchist)

By the way, I used to live in the United States and you don't know how lucky you are. The health care system there has to be the most inefficient and immoral thing I have ever seen. I know a retired 70 year old who's wife died of cancer, and he's now living in a trailer park because the insurance company wouldn't pay the goddamm bills. I live in Canada now, and the the thing that is keeping me from moving back is them repealing Obamacare. I was in the ICU for 3 days when I was a baby because I had no blood sugar(my dad is a diabetic and they thought I had diabetes, he has type 1 which is the highly genetic variant), and if they bring back pre-conditions I won't be able to get covered just because of that(or they won't cover me IF I get diabetes for sure, even if I get can get coverage for everything else).

Whites are still the majority in the United States retard. I grew up in Chicago, there are plenty of awesome black people who contribute to society, more than you do anyway.

The government sold the people out by making the system more like yours.

go to google

type in their screen name

post their facebook link

boom, you've just successfully "doxed" someone

That's the worst you can find?

The one scientist in history that died poor (and it was his own decision, he had plenty of job offers)

also, every Soviet scientist died in poor, in contrast

How can you die in a poor?

How do i get involved in leftist groups in australia? i see salt at unis but what else is there?

Why did he get banned?

But you don't understand, Tesla DID NOT want moeny and even if he did he was a poor businessman. The reason why he remained relativly poor was because he did not know how to play the system to his advantage. He could have done it prehaps, but he had no interest to. It's a really poor analogy because that implies that somehow Tesla wouldnt be able to achive what Paris Hilton did. Also they are from different time periods and I'm pretty sure someone like Paris Hilton wouldn't be able to achive 100$ million networth in Tesla's time but someone like Tesla in our times would be regarded as world-renowed scientist and he would surely get tons of money as well.

Is this written by a 12 year old?

...