I used to be a communist like a lot of you until I started moving towards Not Socialism

I used to be a communist like a lot of you until I started moving towards Not Socialism.
So my question to you is:
Why have you not abandoned international socialism in favor of Not Socialism Holla Forums?

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.org/stream/WarIsARacket/WarIsARacket_djvu.txt
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

You answered your own question, it's not socialism.

What are wordfilters m80.

I was a nazi once. Eventually I decided living my live as a slave to an abstraction is pathetic though.

Tell me more about Not Socialism

Are you an Aryan?
How spoiled is your DNA?
Are Italians and Japanes Ok?
What about Iran?

What leftist works have you actually read?

Anyone can be a Nazi m8.

Marx, Proudhon, Sorel.

That's a new one.

They translate the truth, nazis privatized like crazy and supressed worker's movements.

I'm quite happy to concede that the left-wing ideas espouse here are unworkable and ultimately now act only to disguise SJWs hell bent on absolute power over others. I'm simply not convinced to proper response is to act in the same manner myself.

Assuming you actually read those people and not just their wikipedia articles, how exactly did you go from commie to fascist?

Lots of Italian Marxists went full fascism thanks to Sorel's thought but I never got how that works if you were a principled commie before.

so tell me
why did you spook yourself solid

The Soviet state literally just created one giant market with the state acting as a monopolistic force that replaced the old bourgeois and stomped competition.
Every attempt at communism has failed except for maybe Yugoslavia and to a lesser degree Cuba.
With that said, I don't have a problem with markets, although the means of production should be collectivized into cooperatives.

You're right. That's why I abandoned the international left.

It was kind of a slow transition although, I examined some of my own beliefs regarding communism. It seems to me that a resource based economy is bound to fail. Not to mention, the internationalism, and the SJW's associated with the traditional left were a big turn off for me.
It's been a while since I read his work but as far as I remember, he talks a lot about "parliamentary socialists" as class traitors and he did a good job of explaining how many social programs are simply a means to appease the working class into submission. He also did a good job of pointing out that a lot of the class violence that we see (anarchists tearing shit up being a prime example) is allowed by the bourgeois to a certain extent, so long as it doesn't truly threaten their economic power.
Sorel didn't necessarily push me over the edge into National.Socialism although some of what he wrote started to lead me to certain conclusions.
With that said, I'm generally the against gibs that are apart of many "socialist" party platforms. It doesn't seem to do any good. As far as I'm concerned, if someone doesn't want to work they can starve for all I care. Although production should still be controlled by the people.

Because capitalism is global
And the Commons are global
You can have your little experiment in one area but when China poisons the shit out of your air and water and breeds antibiotic resistant super bugs in their meat production, you'll realize that no man, and no nation, is an island

Can a Nigger be a Nazi?
A Jew?
A Slav?

I think you don't know what Not Socialism is. You should read Mein Kampf again. Want a mango of it?

Anyone can be a Nat.Soc as long as they are willing to work to improve their nation. With that said, a black can live in my society so long as he abides by the rules as a citizen of the state. If he wants to live a life of degeneracy while contributing nothing to society he's more than welcome to go back Africa.

With that said, we'd be better off with a military democracy. Meaning that service members should be the one's with the ability to vote. Those who don't wish to join the service wouldn't necessarily be recognized as full citizens. It's a good means of making sure that only the most patriotic members of the nation are the one's who are making political decisions. It's also a good means of weeding out the degenerates.

...

Because I'm not autistically obsessed over the achievements of my "ancestors" (read: people I share an eighth of a haploid with)

lol

theoretically thats actually a decent idea provided every single serviceman had the same vote, not because of weeding out "degenerates" though, you pog ass nigger

The real benefit would be very few wars, because the "people" that start wars dont have to fight them. Major General Smedley Butler, one of the most decorated Marines to ever have slaughtered the "enemies" of the USofA, proposed such a thing in his seminal pamphlet "War Is A Racket"

archive.org/stream/WarIsARacket/WarIsARacket_djvu.txt

Everyone should read this at some point, especially motarded dick sucks(not nec claiming you are said)

I don't how this relates to the obvious Heinlein inspired fantasies of the poster you're responding to.

Nazis are not really interested in liberating the proletarians.
You are just corporatists. Stooges for the military-industrial complex. For people like Thyssen or Kirdorf. Your entire economy is build on invading other nations and enslaving their proletariat to do your dirty work.

Because its not socialism.

Also, the ideology that claims to represent my "race" used my grandparents as slaves in their factories and bombed my city to dust.

every time

NatSoc is hard to support if you are not white…

If you are a mixed person Nazi is by default not really an option.

what if i want to deliberately destroy the filthy shitstorm of a "culture" they call "Western culture"?

OP, perhaps you could explain to us what you think communism is, as several posts you've made in this thread indicate you have no fucking clue what you are talking about.

Tell me, how will monopoly behave in an environment, where it have no competition, it owns all resources, all products produced owned by it, and it *is* the state?
What will be it modus operandi?