He went to fucking far…

A person can take a decent position, but you know these guys go too far anfem.

...

Why have we go two threads on this faggot?

…What about someone who isn't well-read (yet), but as part of their channel reads literature and talks about it? Like, makes a playlist with videos discussing the literature. Impressions and review from someone not that deep into socialism would be more accessible to newfags, right?

Get Muke to do it.

Why are people hating on LAR again?

LSR

It wasn't a great video, but it's not the worst thing he's done. 5/10 I wouldn't watch again.

bump

his newest video went over the top with the idpol

Xex…
Oh. … Nope. Nothing meets those criteria.

RIP REBEL!

DAE hate rebel because he doesn't make YouTube videos anymore?

Chapo Trap House is pretty good

Eh it wasn't as bad as you made it out to be

I wanna do this after achieving the body image I'm striving for

00:00:31-00:00:38
LSR list of dudebros:
The Amazing Atheist
AlphaOmegaSin
Armoured Skeptic
Barbarossaa
Bearing
Black Pgeon Speaks
Chris Ray Gun
Chistina Hoff Sommers
Computing Forever
Davis Autrini
Feminism Lol
GirlWritesWhat
Goodfella
Harmful Opinions
Hunter Avallone
The Ignored Gender
Jordan Owen
Justicar
Lauren Southern
Louis Le vau
Maddox
Mister Metokur [formerly known as Internet Aristocrat]
MrRepzion
Mundane Matt
The Naked Ape
Nate Talks To You
Paul Joseph Watson
Red Pill Philosophy
Rekt Feminist Videos
RockingMrE
Sandman
Sargon of Akkad
Skep Torr
Shoe0nHead
Stefan Molyneux
Teal Deer
That Guy T
Thinking Ape
Thunderf00t
Undoomed
Vee
Vernaculis
Warcorpse

...

The only thing as far as I know that all of these people have in common is that they are critical of feminism, and LSR tries to paint them all as alt-right neo-Nazis. Pic related.

...

It'd be better if he didn't drop to idpol every so often.

Liberals/Centrists:

Sargonites (propagandists that don't know what they talk about):
Actual far right that are potentialy dangerous:
Anti-feminists

IMO that is.
The rest I don't know or want to know.

That would requiere seeing beyond ideology.

I didn't find his video to be idpol tbh
All he's doing is just making fun of the mra/alt-right memers on youtube

Isn't he the Jason Unruhe of the altright

Why does he constantly move his head back and forth towards the camera?

Well… Jason is a joke and people that follow him are maotists.

Now… What if said maotists had potential access to guns and at some point Jason started saying "NOW IS THE TIME TO KILL THE FIRST WORLD!"?

Canadian RAF?

anyone here know from where is this webm?

Thank the creators of the simulation we live in, Jason will never go that far…

I don't see the issue with making fun of any of these people, they aren't all alt right or racist or sexist or whatever but they are all terrible. "Anti SJW" youtubers are all worthless.

It's not that difficult to knock up a firearm. The hard bit is laying your hands on the primers for the ammunition. Everything after that is basic metalworking.

t. Unruhe fan.

There is a paralel Universe where Jason is the leader of a third-worldist terrorist organisation.

And in there Posadism has become the official ruling ideology of the world.

:(

You got that right.

My ranty take on what we learned in his video:
1. Mundane Matt likes women but not feminism and that is somehow sexist.
2. Warcorpse doesn't want to remember the surname of Richard "The Dick" Coughlan, but does in fact know it.
3. At some point Warcorpse said he was done with Richard "The Dick", but went on to make more videos on him.
4. Sargon of Akkad is not a psychiatrist, and didn't understand a scientific paper.
5. Akkad has little empathy for women facing street harassement[sic] and believes women being asked about their mental health are part of a feminist conspiracy.
6. LSR has a hate boner for NateTalksToYou.
7. Rape =| Burglary
8. Davis Aurini [yes that Sarkeesian Effect scammer] doesn't like BDSM
9. The Amazing Atheist [alias TAA] has no comment on lead poisoning in Flin, Michigan except weird facial expressions.
10. TAA calls himself a Universal Human Self-Determinist which doesn't go home quite well with LSR considering point 9.
11. LSR thinks TAA only cares about white people, despite having called out white nationalists several times.
12. LSR doesn't like MrRepzion's argument executed in a pantless fashion in favour of man-spreading.
13. LSR forgets the fact that men's testicles are not protected in the same way internal organs are.
14. LSR expects men to cross their legs, ignoring the men who are not comfortable doing so.
15. LSR thinks women would be critizised for "man"-spreading.
16. LSR thinks MrRepzion is insecure.
17. LSR thinks the power rich powerful white men have is representative of the power ALL white men have.
18. LSR is an anarchist yet thinks white people should be banned from using the word "Nigga".
19. LSR thinks black people should punch white people who use the word "Nigga".
20. LSR didn't like Akkad's attempt at getting Social Justis course banned from universities.
21. LSR thinks people who complain together circle jerk.
22. LSR is very late with the news that Davis Aurini and Jordan Owen scammed $50.000 from gullible retards with "The Sarkeesian Effect" (ridiculed by thunderf00t among others)
23. Thunderf00t has no right to distance himself from a documentary he has been featured on after seeing that it turned to shit.
24. There are two versions available of "The Sarkeesian Effect".
25. GamerGate was about keeping women out of vidya, not exposing corruption in video game journalism. (That's at least what it started out as.)
26. LSR doesn't like the sound track on "The Sarkeesian Effect".
27. Davis Aurini and Jordan Owen are hypocrites and represenative of every critic of feminism.
28. (Surprise!) LSR is critical of the amount of money Anita Sarkeesian rakes in on her videos, considering she's well off already.
29. Your arguments against feminism are discarded until you do something LSR likes.
30. LSR was an anti-feminist in his mid-teens.
31. The problem is entitlement, not loneliness

I would also like to say that "The Sarkeesian Effect" being a scam doesn't mean that Anita Sarkeesian isn't a scammer (she is).

well hes not entirely wrong on about half those point

Do it mate

stimulator's channel

All the people you named are liberals except for the actual fascists.

I agree with LSR on : 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12 to some degree as it was done in poor taste but the point was valid, 20 a just society is not bad but idpolism is, 22 Aurini is a scammer, 24 TSE is just shit, 26, 27 partially (the are not representative of every critic of feminism), 28 Anita does take in quite a lot. That's 15/31.

My point is that he drags way to much into his video, and to be honest it reminds me somewhat of how Life love and anarchy operates. I still have respect for LSR, love his opposition to statism, capitalism and do not consider myself an anti-feminist, but critical of certain aspects of third-wave feminism.

Yep. Good thing I never liked him.

This. Half the video was him dragging the video out, a quarter was neoliberal shill tier defense of bourgeois feminism, and then the last quarter of it was legitimate criticisms of the people he was talking about.

This. Why does this fool defend liberal feminism?

He understands that "liberal" feminism is a false distinction, like the many thousands on reddit who agree with him.

If reddit agrees with me, I'd take a second look at my views.

Liberal feminism is the most useless, bourgeois pretense ever. Alot of these guys are just social liberals under the clothing of socialists.

I am not a feminist but I wouldn't mind socialist or Marxist feminists especially if they after all this liberal bullshit

Regarding number 1, he said he liked how woman look, smell and feel, in order to prove that he wasn't a woman hater. Do you really not see the irony in that? Women only matter to him insofar as how they improve his life and make it more enjoyable.

Well, guess what.
You only matter to me insofar as how you improve my life.

And I want to improve your life for if your life is imporved mine can be improved.

STIRNER BITCH!

Pretending people matter to you outside of how they interact with you is liberal spooky bullshit.

I can talk in public about how I like someone's appearance, but how I take pleasure in their personality is more intimate, and not something I'd be comfortable putting in a video.

no

True, but at the same time, saying you like women because of the sensual enjoyment you get from their existence is really demeaning and kind of insulting. It implies that those qualities are what are most important in a woman. It implies that he doesn't value the intellectual qualities of women in general. They're eye candy as far as he is concerned.

I really don't understand your point. You don't have to be intimate with someone to like their personality. I assume you have female friends and relatives. Does it not irritate you that some people consider their existence to be for the sake of those people's sensual enjoyment?

Mundane Matt isn't working on the same assumption and you know it.

He's also not talking about specific women and wasn't uncomforable calling most of the women on earth "retarded".
I think what he meant to say was a pretty standard anti-feminist argument - 'women are rational human beings deserving of respect, but I don't like the way feminism sidelines men'. What he fucked up was the thing where you acknowledge that women are actually people like you, not objects who smell nice.

So… because he is still spooked we are to .. what? Kill him? Gulag? What do you propose as a countermessure?

They are also objects that smell nice.

A baker is a human but also an object that gives you bread.

Alienation is not because of "the patriarchy".

I wasn't defending Matt, that should be obvious. The point was that LSR makes stupid liberal counterarguments.

Sorry, I must just be thick. Please be patient with me. Saying you care about people for more than their sexual and/or sensual qualities is far from liberal bullshit. I'm not talking about "women" in the abstract. I'm talking about your female friends and family members. In this case, LSR was calling MundanMatt a woman hater for suggesting that the only value he sees in women as a whole is that of eye candy. Is this not hatred of women? Do you not find sexual objectification objectionable?

I was just talking about what MM's argument is, from his own perspective. He makes the usual liberal assumption that humans other than you are ends, not means. Then, he violates that same assumption by saying that women are only useful when they give him value (their smell, their look, etc.) If the video was about bakers, he might have said "I think bakers are really good people, I like the way they give me bread".
The conclusions MM reached were possibly right, from a post-left perspective, but that isn't what he was going for. I just meant he was thinking like a dumb liberal and his idea failed on that front.
And I didn't say anything about patriarchy, so don't worry

Your argument (and his) was about what a phrase IMPLIES.
And this is how, I too am not defending Matt. I am defending my right to say "DAYUM! That's some fine titties!" without being jugded for "misoginy".
Sam as women can say "What a hunk" and so on.

Whether or not Matt's original statement was objectionable or not is irrelevant at this point as it's LSR"s response that's being scrutinized. Matt is, as said here, making a violation of his own assumption. That is accepted. However, LSR then goes on to make the bourgeois liberal point of saying that it's "bad" to treat people as means at all as a response.

Why is he so keen on defending feminism? It's like it pains him to admit Anita Sarkeesian isn't completely kosher.

One of the comments:

Someone actually recommended The Young "The Armenian genocide didn't happen" Turks? Unfortunately, it seems to me LSR attracts a lot of liberals, and have no problem with them.
His main argument against critics of feminism seems to be:
X is critical of feminism
X has reactionary views
Therefor ALL critics of feminism have reactionary views.
X's arguments need no further investigation.

Wtf. Did that comment get any likes?

21, pic related.

P UR G E T H E M!!!

These idiots will then pass themselves as socialists and water shit down even more.

Holy shit, how is this acceptable?

When does he do that?

daily reminder that if you're not a marxist-leninist, you're not a socialist.

When did he say it was "bad"? He pointed out that it was sexist. Matt said that since he finds women fuckable that means he's not a woman-hater. LSR is right to point out how cringy, nonsensical and oblivious such a statement is. Come on guys, take off the chan blinders, Matt's remark was a clear case of hatred of women and it ought to be criticsized.

youtube.com/watch?v=0DG9LQ6JJvc

LSR should learn how to make a proper cringe compilation; protip: There should be no doubt as to its cringe-worthiness. This wasn't a cringe compilation, it was a list of people LSR don't like. I would like to say, that MrRepzion's video on manspreading and The Sarkeesian Effect debacle was very cringy.

We came before you, but I still recognize you as a socialist. Stop talking like a jackass.

Notice the infestation of liberals in his comment section. He gives us a bad rep.

Appears to me he is pandering to them. He certainly doesn't do much to reeducate them. Is he trying to become the Life love and anarchy of SJWs?

Fucked up the upload. Here it is with sound.

(Polite sage)

Even though this animation's moral is total bullshit, I really enjoy watching these things as entertainment.

lsr sure has a pasty punchable face

Can you explain what you think is wrong with it?

I only care about the pizza guy insofar as he brings me pizza. That is not a rejection of his humanity. Similarly, "sexual objectification" is equally nonsense.

I hate idpol, but am I the only one who thinks LSR's video was good? Let's face it, anti sojowowo culture as cancer as idpol tumblr shit. For fucks sake, they are complete autists and psuedo-intellectual spergs.

how the fuck is this a bad thing?

youtube.com/watch?v=3MTlj0t8ywc

How is this contradictory? Leftypol will go on and on about the ""oppression"" of white workers(while telling other groups to shut up because something something idpol) and bitching about affirmative action but will still argure with white nationalists.

Like leftypol TAA really only cares about white people but he's not anti-other like white nationalists are

Because it's constantly being unfairly attacked?

It's a decent video, but you know how leftypol is

You've forgotten your shitposting flag.

What about Felix the hentai aficionado (anne-mariefrankie.blogspot.com/2016/05/black-pigeon-speaks-is-bloke-called.html)?

...

would chain by the nose ring and ride like it's corrida

No. Both groups are shit. This video wasn't good.

Oh my god I'd bash this faggot's head in

Can you give an actual reason as to why the video wasnt good?

LSR is simply engaged in tribalist shit-slinging, that's why the video is crap. I've gotten about 6 mins in and had to stop, simply because it's obvious he's approaching this from the a priori position these people are always wrong. Furthermore, he's chosen awful example to make his case. Finally, he's a smug sanctimonious twat I wouldn't buy a used car from.

You havent given a reason as to why the video is bad

What your comment boils down to is 'i dont like his approach'

The video is supposed to persuade me that the people subject to his polemic are wrong. It's not doing that, for the reasons above. Ergo, it is shit, rainman.

Dude, you just described what every youtube drama channel does. Stop worrying about it and do something more productive instead, like reading books or watching porn.

LSR is not a drama channel.

I'm going to take this as you masking what an utter tit you are.

LSR is definitely drama. He's a sperging idiot

That may well be true, but his intent is clearly to agitate.

But he still engages in Youtube drama, hence this thread.

His choice of targets reveals intent to agitate in this specific video.

agitate whom and for what?

He's pandering to social liberals.

Who is it meant to agitate? Alt-righters, anti-fems and the leftists that love to kiss up to these groups to prove that they're 'not like those other leftists?

So the video didnt make you think that the people mentioned in his video are wrong because you didnt like his approach therefore the video is bad?

What makes you think he's not a social liberal himself?

You've forgotten to put your anarcho-nihilist flag on.

Eh,
it was OK.
I just disagree with his idpol stance and I don't think he's really attacking their ideas.
Part of his video is just poking fun of how some of their jokes have women as the butt of the joke, which I feel is somewhat irrelevant.

Learn your idpol pleb

youtu.be/MurqE_5I6_k

Really? He says he's a libertarian…

←
Now you don't have to go on YouTube

Yes but if declaring you were something made it true you'd not have trannies demanding estrogen by the truckload, would you?

I dunno, Wolfe's videos are pretty interesting. And considering his credentials it's much harder for reactionaries to pull out the "le socialists are young and uneducated" card. This is perhaps the single most valuable quality for idiots on the internet

youtu.be/fyAADrgI_Y8
youtu.be/OWjto-wdXJE

He seems to be touting a TERF line per verbatim, and even admits he does it purely out of some nihilistic opportunism.

The difference between him and Jason is Jim makes no attempt to hide he's a troll and get a rise out of people on the right or left. He basically sees us all as the punchline to his joke since we refuse to see the light of how moderators are the modern bourgeois.

Jason on the other hand is so morally puritan, he is unable to cope with varying opinion and is some lunatic talking to himself.

They are the heroes the left deserves. The Comedian and Rorschach respectively.

I like Thom Avella. Social anarchist with a nice clean professional format
m.youtube.com/channel/UCw-4391y4Lm0LZz2Z6pau9Q

I'm not an anarchist, and I don't care as long as he's left

if you check out his content you'll find many things about socialism. You're analogy doesn't stand because the tranny shit is a matter of science and this isn't.

This guy is another one pandering to social liberals. Did you see the comments on his new video. He attracted Kirsti Winters and the Garrett guy. Fuck. I wish we had anarchists that weren't so fucking dumb. Libertarian left was good, but he's no longer making videos.

Which proves what?

If it doesn't stand, you'll be able to (assuming you have a phallus) throw on a frock, repeatedly go into the ladies toilets in public places and encounter no resistance when you declare yourself a woman.

Or perhaps there's more to it than just labels in both cases, hmmm?

Nu
submedia.tv/stimulator/

maybe tell them they deny the armenian genocide? It's not like they begin each show saying "Armenians didn't die, let's get on with the news"

...

Where did I say it wasn't real? Why are the normies laughing (or more likely hostile and possibly violent)? It's the same reason that the transperson is demanding those pills, yes?

The fucking biggest anarcho-syndicalist youtuber is literally and autistic sperglord whiny little bitch.

You can't make this shit up. Too good.

← : This is how you do a cringe compilation

Mistakes LSR fucked up in his "cringefest":
1. Overeditorialization: a good cringe compilation let's people see enough of the video to understand it is NOT out of context. LSR took second-long soundbites and interpreted them in the most unsympathetic way possible. In other words he cherry picked.
2. Too much commentary: a good cringe compilation let's the subject of the video dig his or her own grave with his/her own spade. LSR throws mud at anyone he disagrees with.
3. Overpoliticized: a good cringe compilation is first and foremost about being funny, LSR cares only about promoting a liberal agenda, and idpol feminism.
4.Unfunny: A good cringe compilation is entertaining. LSR tried to hard to be funny in his unfunny "cringefest", and didn't even manage to find something juicy from all those reactionary YouTube retards. This is either because laziness, or more likely because he has hate boners for specific people that he wish to embarrass, and that is not as cringe worthy as he would like them to be.

Watchu mean? They're just a couple of good, rational, level headed youtubers. I mean they are so rational. Just so rational. Their reasoning skills are obviously superior. I mean just so rational…

Its fine, we have actual theorists who are respected in the international community.

Can you say the same?

You people literally exist on the internet and in prison gangs get a grip

One of your biggest alt-right youtuber is a bald man who had mommy issues, rode on nepotism and public schools while later complaining about them and is the leader of a cult group.

daily reminder that the proletariat bowing down before a stable state which exists to stabilize the rule of the law of the value is literally the opposite of the revolutionary proletarian semi-state/DotP.

Molymeme is not alt-right tho, he's just AnCap that is shilling for "the red pill" ideology at the moment, you should see his videos from the past, they're nothing like his new ones. Only Richard B. Spencer, Jared Taylor and people from American Renaissance and National Policy Institiute can truly be considered "alt-right". And there is also bunch of other youtubers who are jumping on board of this train without even knowing what alt right means.

...