Okay, Holla Forums...

People push the narrative that the white majority'so racism is what makes them easy to control, but minorities are too dumb and don't care about anything in the future so they end up as a monolith of votes that will vote against American values every 4 years until the end of time

I know that seeing any group vote in a total block makes me uncomfortable. There should be enough of a difference of opinion between people to split support between multiple parties.

now that is >reddit spacing
also we are nazis. nothing (((neo))) about it.

My bad. Okay - thanks for filling me in. Is the neo part jewish because they control the free market? Whatsup there?

>>>/polblog/

See
and go to >>>/polarchive/

That is a bot that spams that copypasta, called "mantrabot" in other threads. Also the "reddit spacing" and blogshit posts are likely D&C (Divide and Conquer) shills. You will get a better sense for which posts are genuine after reading about COINTELPRO and lurking a bit more, newfriend. Basically, ignore one liner faggots.

To answer one of your questions, going full neo-Nazi doesn't work better, it doesn't work at all, anyone who advocates it is a Fed or a cuckchan retard who found his way here through a Buzzfeed article. I'm sure TPTB are quite miffed that they've kept the ebil racist natzee narrative going for so long without having managed to meme it into existence to bring their plans to fruition. Instead we have David Duke who comes off like Mr. Rogers and Trump playing 18-dimensional Backgammon with his Jewish family and friends while surrounding himself with semi-open White Nationalists. Hopefully this will end up with us in control of a good chunk of media, at which point we can start to apply real solutions.

Also, stop being so polite here you faggot.

On the difference between us and Muslims: Muslims are against the west, and white people in general, considering our culture will not and cannot mesh with theirs. We, on the otherhand, whilst also having truth and straightforward views, apply ourselves to the greater need and supposedly the greater success of "the white race". Muslims are anti-globalist for their needs, they are still also anti-us.

The Neo-Nazi defense works because them even mentioning us will eventually validate our existence, even as a problem, and people will come to investigate. When they come to investigate, they will be redpilled, as long as they have a brain. This is the insidious nature of the beast, our beast.

I'm not redpilling you on "x" anymore, though. Just lurk moar, and look at the newfag threads in the catalog. Lots of informational shit there. And if you have to ask questions, find a relevant thread, and pose the question as a confrontational argumentative point.

Well that's a deep burn.

I read this one the other day, and I've been working through some of the archive stuff. I watched a few of the videos on the former thread, too. I honestly can't say that I'm redpilled on the holocaust, but I'm digging a bit more now and actually thinking about stuff.

Man. I fucking hoped that was it. I used to use halfchan a bit back in the day and they never struck me as full Nazis there, just people who posted a lot of despicable shit to make a point about freedom of speech. If the political views land anywhere here, where do you think they land? The Gamergate thread I read put most of the Gamergate people in the libertarian left before they redpilled, which is where I always saw myself up until this election.

I see that difference, sure. I'll lurk, and I'll refrain from posting new threads. Thanks for the info.

One more question - Do you guys use plebbit, halfchan instead of the actual names to avoid search engine traffic? I figure the broken links are to avoid referral traffic, and the archived stuff is the same. Are the amusing names part of that, or is it just that you kinda hate the people who use them (which I could also see)?

The names are just clever quips and are purely derogatory. As such, I'm sure you'd see to never mention where you come from in the future and attempt to fully assimilate with the culture, or not. It doesn't really matter, as long as someone takes you, I suppose. Either way, the eco-system here is technically fragile, but it's not so fragile that a few newcomers every now and then will obliterate the fabric. Enjoy your time in this godless pit of malice.

1) You don't need to write a fucking text wall, just articulate point by point because nobody wants to read your fucking opinion for 5 whole minutes.
2) No, Wahabbists aren't anti-globalists they just want Saudi Arabian Fundamentalists to be head of the globalists instead of Jewish Communists
3) Most major problems in the world would be fixed if we killed all the Jews, and that includes the Saudis who are also ethnically Jews.
4) Lurk Moar

I personally support violently purging most of modern West Africa, stealing their resources, dismantling their current infrastructure and giving American Negroes a clean slate in West Africa their original homeland.

I also think we should have systematically genocided and castrated the Native Americans and so should have Spain.

Muslims want to create a global superstate (caliphate, empire, whatever) that is under Islamic law. That is what their "jihad" is aimed at in all its many forms. They ARE globalists. Most of them are also mindless illiterate third world drones who do what their leaders tell them to do. I can tell you first hand that Iraqis and Afghanis, especially Afghanis, are worse than niggers. Maybe not as obnoxious and loud, but more disgusting and untrustworthy.

...

Footnotes:
>The existence of gas chambers is bullshit for a number of reasons youtube.com/watch?v=z3TveySBlkQ

All that said, you still need to check the archives fully.

Enjoy the ride. user out.

Actual, no-shit National Socialists. "Neo-nazis" are a Jewish Hollywood creation closer to liberals than anything else, people who fall for that meme are nothing like real NatSocs and are merely useful idiots for Jews. Watch The Greatest Story Never Told and check out the Holohoax threads in /polarchive/ and you'll probably become one yourself.

It's kind of like Conservatism, except it actually attempts to conserve things outside of fleeting carnal pleasures and personal finances.

IMO, they either need to get their shit together or GTFO. Here's my take on it:

1. They're not happy here.
2. We're not happy having them around.
3. They don't really want to be here.
4. We don't really want them here.

It's like showing up to a party, finding out that out of the ten people you know at the party, nine of them hate your guts. You're super uncomfortable there. Do you stay, or do you leave? Do you pound sand, or do you start making demands that the other guests talk about the things you want, that the host plays the music you want, and that everybody there has to give you so much of their food and drink so that "it's fair"?

If niggers could learn to
A) Become self-sufficient;
B) Stop being criminals;
C) Stop being primitive savages
they wouldn't even be so bad to be around - except for the stink and that greasy residue they leave on everything they touch. Plus, if they haven't learned to be these things in the hundred and fifty years since this country tore itself apart for their benefit, I doubt they ever will.

Except we aren't mudshits.
We are not being paid by Israel.
We don't rape sheep (well most of us).
We don't bomb innocents yet.
We don't worship a pedophile god.

Mudshits aren't fighting for their country or race or even themselves. They're fighting because Israel is funding them via Saudi Arabia to keep the ME destabalized and the US involved. And we are not one group. We all share in a collective idea called logic and facts. There is not religion uniting us. We may be united by wanting to preserve a future for white children, but there are varying shades of white. Germans are not French. Americans are not Brittish. Civic nationalism isn't what we aspire to. However once all of our countries become Nationalized, we will work together to acomplish very great things.

You are justifying genocide.

That third picture is about my favorite thing ever. I've felt like a bit of an ideological refugee lately, and I don't know where I'm going but it's sure as fuck not back where I came from. Assimilation sounds good to me.

1) But, my ego. 2) That is indeed a key difference 3) I'm not sure if I'm there on the Jews, but the Saudi's disgust me. Are they really ethnically Jewish? 4) k.

That's far more intense than I was expecting. I suppose it's not much more extreme than what's already being done by a small group of ultra-rich fuckholes, though.

Do you reject Imperialism? It sounds like that's the issue there.

I know I've heard people say that Hitler was pretty into the idea of Zionism, as it would get the Jews to leave peacefully. Is that just rubbish? I'll watch the video now, I appreciate the link.

Does the NatSoc movement, to Holla Forums's eyes, need to focus on race, or is it a national spirit/cultural assimilation thing?
Okay. I'll check it out.

Okay, I can see the pragmatism there. Out of interest - do you think if they fulfilled A,B, and C they'd end up relatively equal in society, or do you think a defacto or outright class/caste system would be in place?

I'm just trying not to disregard any opinions out of a fear of what might happen if I think about them. I've come to realize that "you are justifying genocide" is a bullshit argument meant to shut down conversation when the entirety of the mainstream political spectrum ignores, commits and justifies genocides as a matter of course.

Iraq is a genocide, it was all to make money for Bush and Cheney, and the amount of people I've heard justify it is mindblowing.

Of course, when I replied I didn't realize I was talking to a bot.

...

...

Yes, to both, for culture springs forth from the racial spirit, and most crime in Western Civilization is the result of racial chaos.

Personally I have no issues with civilized, high-IQ, vetted visitors and workers being 5 to 10 percent of an area (and have personally lived in such a space which everyone was very happy in, and yet it no longer exists, thanks to Marxism) as long as it doesn't lead to mass racemixing (something that is not natural but borne through propaganda). Extreme racemixing tends to result in the worst traits of both races in the product, and a rootless shell without history perfect for molding by the state, a recipe for destruction of a nation under foreign control, which is why they push it so.

Pic related is the Waffen SS, each unit fighting for the Reich so that their own nations and races could resist globalist Marxism.

Except jews and modern mudshits. Semetic mudshits, not lighter skinned arabs
They both are cancer and need culled.

What about minor cultural mixing? I enjoy reading about different religions, and mysticism - would that be bad? What about practicing a foreign religion?

NatSoc Germany got pretty intense in terms of propaganda and censorship - and given that it's disgust with the Clinton campaigns propaganda and censorship that brought me here, they're sorta sticking points for me. Do you think a modern NatSoc government would be the same, or would have more liberty?

This is something you as a newcomer must understand off the bat. You will often see some posts here saying we must KILL ALL NIGGERS, AND DO IT RIGHT NOW!.

Post like these are often one of the following:

A)A crazy neonazi, wich we call "Stormfags" (ie: a user of the website Stormfront, a honeypot for brainwashed rednecks). These people are usually very low IQ and believe genocidal tales like the Holohoax.

B) A agent from one alphabet soup or another (FBI, JIDF, CIA, etc, etc) trying to get you to cause a false flag or turn you into a violent element like Dylan Roof and the like.

C)A troll, with the intent to make you go "an hero" in public (ie: break down with demoralization and do something stupid)

There is nothing wrong with studying and appreciating other cultures, as long as you don't support them mixing with the legislature wich emanates from western culture.

Example: Studying Hindu mythologie is great, subverting society to implement sharia law is not.

First of all, don't post like that, because it pisses people off. Now let me go off on an autistic tangent:

To anyone with a brain, the clear bad guys in WW2 were the allies, by far. Kikes are literal evil; they are ruthless blood suckers who would watch you flayed if they gained a shekel from it. These bastards scheme and plot, if you haven't read the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion you don't really belong here.

The audacity of their crimes is hard to accept, but it's a fact of the matter, these people (Rothschilds are apical) rape the world. From the Battle of Plassey where they shipped out thousands of tons of India's gold to the Napoleonic wars where they bought up half of Europe, hell, most European wars from the 1700s on were funded by them (on both sides). Their greed and avarice knows no bounds. Their power is what led a group of kikes from the Bronx into plotting the revolution that killed Russia for 100 years. Do you know how many people the Stalin killed? How many people died in the Red Terror? What those jews did to Nicholas II and his family? They practice the same ideology that the modern left espouses today.

Woodrow Wilson and FDR are the biggest kikes of all, the former being responsible for the final nail in our international jewry coffin, as the establishment of the Fed put our monetary policy, and thus, economy directly in Rothschilds hands. 100 years later and they still have it firmly in their grasp, it doesn't seem like Trump will challenge that. Basically, I'm ranting, but reading is pretty important, obviously. A month of cursory discussion on this more conspiratorial historiography is going to give you a very vapid understanding of it and make you resort to magical thinking when you try to theorize conspiracy in the future. This is a logical movement, based on truths, and that's why you'll see anons as blunt as they are.

That's because kikes use MUH HOLOCAUST as a way to victim themselves out of literally any discussion if it turns sour.

White genocide is very real and I suggest you learn about it.

You guys are damn good at spotting honeypots. That TRS survey I read about was shady as fuck.

No cunt, you're the agent troll Big Guy.

It's not even just Jews. All the 'progressives' did during that election campaign was 'MUH IMAGINARY HOLOCAUST' and it seemed to be just as effective.

Spotting deception is our job.

Do I really need to read it? I was redpilled in like 2013. The only reason I haven't read it is because it would be like I already had, like reading a textbook about algebra or some shit.

Checked

I guarantee those were Jews or very very kosher goy, friend. Install the coincidence detector.

Stormfront,ironmarch ect. are some of the best faggot shill baits because they just can't help but assume everyone is from either of them or even knows they exist. So they out themselves quick.

The protocols fo the learned eldersof zion is a must read if you want to understand the nature of why jews are so intrinsicaly deceitful and deranged. It makes the Koran look like a joke in the evil department.

I didn't even mean to link to a gamergate analysis, hah. I wasn't involved in that faggotry, but at least it served a purpose.

It's not exactly long or anything… If you can't or don't read books, then you're probably not going to be doing much other than watching the show as it unfolds for you, maybe understanding a little bit based on what other anons say. Otherwise, the full context will be lost on you, or well, anyone without some understanding of the historical background.

Isn't because they're parasitic nation-wreckers that can only survive through subversion?

I'm an engineering student. I can probably handle it. I'll just read it.

Perhaps (((you))) do this but certainly not all of us, cuckchan. Some of us know not to punch to the right.

Didn't mean to sage.

I agree of course, but I would like to spare the Bobby Fischers of the world and put them in Madagascar as Hitler wished.

What said, and I don't feel it got intense, much of that is propaganda. I feel that what we are under right now is far more intense considering I cannot walk past a television without seeing a white blonde woman and a black male interacting together in a commercial as if they were supposed to be a couple.

Protip: The famous Nazi book burning picture? They were burning books with the sort of bullshit that is brainwashing our people into the Marxists pouring out from nearly every single one of our Universities right now. When we finally do it, the fire will be visible from space.

I'll have a read. I'm into the logic and truth. I'm down to keep reading into this stuff.

Them being parasitic vermin is a byproduct of their education and disturbing biological nature. It's quite complex to explain, but the reason they are like that stems from a few thing:

1.Generations of inbreeding made them rid with mental diseases like sociopathy and psycopathy

2.Matriarcal societal structure wich promotes weakness and deceitfulness, instead of masculine virtues such as honor, honesty, etc.

3.Imperialist delusions from their holy book wich tells them since birth, both via oral tradition and formal education, that they are better than everyone else on the planet and destined to rule it while exploting all peoples for their benefit

4.Low birth rates and predatory lending wich leads them to act parasitical and exploitative

5.This is one of the most important points: Rich jews are almost all atheists with a lust for power and money due to their psycopathic nature, while poorer jews have been brainwashed by the higher castes into believing stuff like the holohoax, they literaly believe all white people are genocidal maniacs out to get them

6. A lack of foresight wich leads them to commit the same political and societal mistakes over and over, like subverting a nation and them be awestruck and surprised when people get fed up with their bullshit. As far as most middleman jews know, they are actualy benevolent being leading humanity towards a multicultural peacefull world ruled by them. Such world, obviously, is an utopian dream not feasible in reality.

Cool. I don't mind that at all.

Well, I don't really know that much (read Speer's book and 'the Rise and Fall of the Third Reich' but I'm starting to think they're less than the whole truth) but I want to make sure that the propaganda that made me walk away from the modern world in disgust wouldn't be of the people I start talking to instead.
You're right though - modern propaganda is far more advanced and widespread.

wouldn't be the intent of*, I'm kinda rambling. Forgive me.

Well, I should note that the Protocols are a sham. But that doesn't downplay their importance. First of all, they set the stage for the entirety of the 20th century, so that alone makes them a primary document. But their being plagiarized and probably a fabrication of the czarist secret police is not a tarnish, in my opinion. They just knew what the nature of international jewry was, couldn't convince the public through traditional means, or thought it was a bad idea… so they got memetic, and pretended to be the kikes with this fake meeting minutes.

If this is confusing, well, after reading them, it's clear whoever wrote the protocols was prescient and had a good understanding of the trajectory intended for the world under international jewry. So that is reason enough to recommend them to everyone and anyone.

Knew all that and more. Additionally, they're parasites because it's the only way they can survive. If they subvert a culture by promoting multiculturalism, they're less likely to be seen as outsiders. As a result, that culture commits suicide and they move onto the next one to begin the process anew.

This is no longer truth, they now do it due to their nature. Jews have a choice to retire to israel and leave the rest of the world alone. Instead they kept to their internatrional exploitative tactics while claiming harassment.

"The Jew cries out in pain as he strikes you"- Polish proverb

Your terrorist groups might well be working for justified interests, but they are not at all our allies. Jews and muslims have a long history with Christians, and we have never got along. And we never will.

Both are utterly perverse and seek to undo everything we hold dear. Whilst we both might hate the globalists (I'd argue many actually do not as it is often the globalists funding and arming them); we can never have allegiance with those who have no concept of justice, honour, order, honesty or purity.

If you are not talking about the 'terrorist groups' but rather people like Sadam Hussein, Gaddaffi, Assad, and going further back the Shah of Persia; then yes, we pretty much unanimously support them. They also all opposed islam, often with brutal methods (as that is the only way to keep such a primitive and barbarous group down).

I think that is where you've gone astray. The 'terrorists' are the tools of the globalists. The nationalists were their 'brutal oppressive tyrannical dictators'. We side with those 'dictators', not with the pedophilic, deceitful shitskin masses who seek to eradicate all trace of untainted white DNA and Christianity from the planet.

I didn't say that wasn't the case. It's animal instinct. Besides, Israel can only survive through deceit.

This user is correct. Terrorist groups are the arab equivalent of revolutionaries in the western world. They are extremists armed and guided by jewish interests with the intent to destabilize a region or government. Such groups are often discarded after thei serve their purpose (See mujahdeen a few years back, or ISIS for a more recent example). Osama is a strange story, the guy was indeed a terrorist who got in way over his head. He actualy had very little to do with 9/11, ironicaly, the only thing he did was claim credit for it. He was dead yers before he was officialy killed by seal team, wich coincidentaly all died on a mysterious accident following his "death".

Another important read is "Rules for Radicals-by ((Saul Alinsky))". This book outlines every tactical plitical move dictated by jews to their puppets. It is basicaly an atheist version of the talmud.

I'm reading the Protocols at the minute, but I'll get onto that one next.

You're supposed to lurk for 2 years before posting, newfag. That being said, you still are not entirely red-pilled on race and evolutionary psychology, otherwise you would have answered your own question.
Comparing us to Boko Haram doesn't work because black and whites have different psyches. I reccomend reading Understanding human history by Micheal Hart in order to get a better grasp on it. The basic idea is that blacks are more impulsive than whites are, this in combination with their higher testosterone predisposes them to violence. The answer to the whole "what stops you from turning into white boko haram?" is literally the European psyche, white who do not demonstrate this trait we call psycho and sociopaths.

kek any muslim who tells you they are anti-globalist are only against dominance of other cultures. They themselves want to be the global power, and if you do not believe me then realize that muslims are obligated to lie to non-believers in order to convert them more docile by any means necessary. This is called taqiya. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taqiya

We aren't neo. That's the difference. Neo-Nazis are "HUR NIGGERS IS DUMB." Nazi's are about the success of their nation. We believe in honor, dignity, truth, racial pride, self-determination, agency, respect, tradition, self-restraint, etc. Let me put it in le reddit terms, we believe there are strong arguments for a homogeneous nation and a heteronormative culture.

Jews are not Lamarckian creatures. To gain a better understanding of them, Read the culture of critique trilogy. Before your reddit "enlightened" sense starts tingling, it was written by an at the time professor of psychology UC Berkeley who specialized in evolutionary psychology.
They have attempted to start the war on the moral high ground for the last year, calling us racist, sexist, etc. Which Holla Forums is, and has no problem with. The riots you saw when trump won were a reflection of people who had the "moral highground" attempting to start shit. But conservatives are the ones with guns, so good luck.

The jews have attempted to co-opt the pro-white movement. We see this with the Alt-right shit going on right now, and is why Holla Forums gets so asspained whenever someone calls us part of the alt-right.

What was the point of your question?

I've been drinking, polite sage

Just got home from work. This is the dumbest thread in weeks. You are on a fascist/natsoc imageboard. Read the sticky, it's not some fucking secret. Everything in OP has been discussed for years. That is why there is a sticky with everything in it.

OP I don't care about how you feel. You came to us. If you don't want to lurk, if you don't want to assimilate, go fuck yourself. You are the problem. You are weak for even making this thread, and the strong control the weak. Gas yourself now.

This is the distinction I'm trying to work out.
Thanks for the book recommendations, I'll add them to my list.

Have you ever read the fountainhead by Ayn Rand?
I sure as fuck haven't, she's a kike and it's long as fuck. But there is a speech in it given by the bad guy, Toohey. In it, he gives a very good breakdown of how to dismantle a society by the means of ruling mens souls.

"There are many ways. Here’s one. Make man feel small. Make him feel guilty. Kill his aspiration and his integrity. That’s difficult. The worst among you gropes for an idol in his own twisted way. Kill integrity by internal corruption. Use it against himself. Direct it towards a goal destructive of all integrity. Preach selflessness. Tell man that altruism is the ideal. Not a single one has ever reached it and not a single one ever will. His every living instinct screams against it. But don’t you see what you accomplish ? Man realises that he’s incapable of what he’s accepted as the noblest virtue - and it gives him a sense of guilt, of sin, of his own basic unworthiness. Since the supreme ideal is beyond his grasp, he gives up eventually all ideals, all aspiration, all sense of his personal value. He feels himself obliged to preach what he can’t practice. But one can’t be good halfway or honest approximately. To preserve one’s integrity is a hard battle. Why preserve that which one knows to be corrupt already? His soul gives up its self respect. You’ve got him. He’ll obey. He’ll be glad to obey – because he can’t trust himself, he feels uncertain, he feels unclean. That’s one way.

Here’s another. Kill man’s sense of values. Kill his capacity to recognise greatness or to achieve it. Great men can’t be ruled. We don’t want any great men. Don’t deny conception of greatness. Destroy it from within. The great is the rare, the difficult, the exceptional. Set up standards of achievement open to all, to the least, to the most inept – and you stop the impetus to effort in men, great or small. You stop all incentive to improvement, to excellence, to perfection. Laugh at Roark and hold Peter Keating as a great architect. You’ve destroyed architecture. Build Lois Cook and you’ve destroyed literature. Hail Ike and you’ve destroyed the theatre. Glorify Lancelot Clankey and you’ve destroyed the press. Don’t set out to raze all shrines – you’ll frighten men, Enshrine mediocrity - and the shrines are razed.

Then there’s another way. Kill by laughter. Laughter is an instrument of human joy. Learn to use it as a weapon of destruction. Turn it into a sneer. It’s simple. Tell them to laugh at everything. Tell them that a sense of humour is an unlimited virtue. Don't let anything remain sacred in a man’s soul – and his soul won’t be sacred to him. Kill reverence and you’ve killed the hero in man. One doesn’t reverence with a giggle. He’ll obey and he’ll set no limits to obedience – anything goes – nothing is too serious.

Here’s another way. This is most important. Don't allow men to be happy. Happiness is self-contained and self-sufficient. Happy men have no time and no use for you. Happy men are free men. So kill their joy in living. Take away from them what they want. Make them think that the mere thought of a personal desire is evil. Bring them to a state where saying ‘I want’ is no longer a natural right, but a shameful admission. Altruism is of great help in this. Unhappy men will come to you. They’ll need you. They’ll come for consolation, for support, for escape. Nature allows no vacuum. Empty man’s soul – and the space is yours to fill.

I don’t see why you should look so shocked, Peter. This is the oldest one of all. Look back at history. Look at any great system of ethics, from the Orient up. Didn’t they all preach the sacrifice of personal joy ? Under all the complications of verbiage, haven’t they all had a single leitmotif: sacrifice, renunciation, self-denial ? Haven’t you been able to catch their theme song – ‘Give up, give up, give up, give up’ ? Look at the moral atmosphere of today. Everything enjoyable, from cigarettes to sex to ambition to the profit motive, is considered depraved or sinful. Just prove that a thing makes men happy and you’ve damned it. That’s how far we’ve come. We’ve tied happiness to guilt. And we’ve got mankind by the throat.

Throw your first born into a sacrificial furnace – lie on a bed of nails – go into the desert to mortify the flesh – don’t dance – don't go to the movies on Sunday – don't try to get rich – don’t smoke – don’t drink. It’s all the same line. The great line. Fools don’t think that taboos of this nature are just nonsense. Something left over, old-fashioned. But there’s always a purpose in nonsense. Don’t bother to examine a folly – ask yourself only what it accomplishes. Every system of ethics that preached sacrifice grew into a world power and ruled millions of men."

*Happiness was exchanged with the concept of higher purpose

Funnily enough - I have read Rand. The woman was batshit, but she wrote convincingly. I've linked that speech to people before as a description of what I see happening in the world.

She can write a good critique on postmodernism. I read her as a teenager, like most other anons, so it's not like she's worthless… I'm sure she helped me get to my current point of view. But objectivism and modern libertarianism is very kosher. Rand Paul was supposed to be Donald Trump, I bet.

National socialism is applying the scientific method to humans, and attempting to create a society that is in tune with our nature. It is literally just getting rid of bad things while promoting good things. It is promoting ideal humanity instead of bestial humanity. Learn more, reddit. There are a lot of actual Nazis here, but yes, the answer probably isn't to run around waving the swastika, which many of us do not do. Remember Germany was in an awful position economically and culturally after WWI and they were able to recover in record time, and still able to face off against nearly the whole world. National socialism, or at least the ideas it puts forth are the future, whatever guise they are under. Vincit Omnia Veritas. We will win in the end, because we are the moral, the truthful, and the strong. Look up George Lincoln Rockwell on youtube, and Adolf Hitler end to poverty. Watch The Greatest Story Never Told, and learn about Holohoax.

Also
kek

Doesn't surprise me. Most anons had an objectivist phase.

I guess I just mean that they need the same shit. To stop being sucked dry by corrupt globalists for nothing but the almighty dollar being in the possession of someone to whom money has long since become nothing but a way of keeping score. I think that they're often an easy target because their societies are less rigid and have less institutions which need to be corrupted.

It was definitely a kick in the face to some pretty deeply indoctrinated values. I think unregulated capitalism tends to be a disaster in practice, though.

All anons are still 'objectivist'. What, are you a subjectivist?

The truth doesn't vary from person to person. Decisions have consequences. Believing niggers to be useful and upstanding members of society does not make it so. There is an objective reality; this is that, and that is this. You cannot interpret things as you like, attemptng to do so is the reason why the world is in the mess it is today. Doesn't matter how many times you say 'diversity is strength'; it never will be. Doesn't matter how hard you believe that there is not a jewish globalist conspiracy; there is. Your subjective opinion means fuck all. There is only the truth.

Never before have I seen such bullshit on Holla Forums.

They need to be free of islam. Do you know where the world was most prosperous, where the centres of learning were, where civilisation was strongest before the muslims came? It was Egypt, it was Syria, it was Persia and Anatolia. Islam is a piece of shit religion that utterly destroys people. Those societies were more advanced 2000+ years ago than they are today; there were higher literacy rates, there was more intellectual thought, there was higher standards of living. If you want those people to have good lives again; you need to get rid of islam.

Yeah, and they remained the scientific and cultural center of the world until they were crushed by the Mongols. The rape of Baghdad was pretty devastating to their intelligencia.

I'm using it in the Randian philosophical sense which is that everyone acts in their own self-interest with personal happiness being the end goal of life which is is ultimately reduced to epicurianism. Lrn2context dumbass

Islam was split into two warring ideologies at the time; a scientific and a fundamentalist group.

The scientific side of islam, which though they never really did much inventing, certainly at least preserved information; was soundly losing the ideological war to the fundamentalist group.

Then the cultural and scientific center of the scientific class of Islamists was annihilated by the Mongols, and we've had fundamentalist Islam ever since.

That's put succinctly. To put in context what I mean there, though - if, in the middle of the Protestant Reformation, the Protestants had been crushed by a third party and Catholicism (in the form it existed in during the time) was all that were left after the third party empire receded - I'm not sure I'd blame Catholicism for the disappearance of Protestant thought, or the position of the Europeans hundreds of years later - just the vicissitudes of history.

Untrue, common western myth. Islam was from its inception a retarded religion. The people came out of arabian desert and found the shattered remnants of Rome and Persia; you see the Roman and Sassanid Empires had a gigantic war just 2 years prior which left either side military and economically shattered. The arabs encountered essentially no resistance anywhere and thus quickly spread, and also began to utilise slave armies. Rather than adopt the societal norms of superior cultures (a common thing for barbarian conquerors to do) the muslims refused to integrate with them (as they do today) and instead created their own shit-hole barracks outside of the cities (assuming they didnt completely destroy the cities). You will find essentially every technological breakthrough was achieved by a first generation convert; even by the second generation most people tended to be utterly ruined by the idiotic 'faith'.

There were a couple of attempts to 'reinterpret' the koran (so that people could think for themselves) but these groups were slaughtered in their entirety. The few other breakthroughs were done by Persians who were markedly stubborn in the face of muslims; they are in fact the only muslim conquered people who do not speak arabic.

Haven't read the kike. I hate how kikes always re-define words, though it is clearly a strategy of their to manipulate history. Ovens please.

check'd

Germany under the Weimar republic, and war reparations was in a bad spot too. They were suffering in a lot of ways that we are today, one of which was Jews having a disproportionate amount of control and peddling communism and they recovered. They recovered because the principles of national socialism. Those principles are how to overcome. Also, if you are a yank, remember that they didn't have nearly the amount of guns we do here. Now, a part of being a Holla Forumslack is doing your own investigating, that is how we grow and change and become more. I gave you a couple places to start, make us proud newfag. Also lurk m0ar.

I don't know about Antolia, but Persia and Egypt historically had white ruling castes.

That's one of the basic rules for marxists. Catch people up in linguistic traps and bog them down in new definitions so they can never argue the actual point.

Thanks for taking the time to educate a newfag with an obviously blogpost-ish question. I'm going back to lurking and only commenting when I've discovered something relevant through investigation as soon as this post dies down - but this post has been a gold mine for specific literature on areas I need to know about. I'll have reading material for months after this.

One final book. Read Explaining Post-Modernism by Stephan Hicks. I would actually recommend starting with this, then going to the blank slate by pinker, then understanding human history by Hart, then culture of critique. By then you will have a solid base and can proceed into other literature while having a very solid foundation.

Here, take these too

Some of the fiction and poetry in that first picture have been favorites of mine for a long time. Good to see Blake, Elliot and Hesse in there =D

One more newfaggy question - is there a pastebin or archived thread that talks about net security? I think I should change my VPN and whatnot to make sure I'm not using one that's owned by the globalists.

probably
>>>Holla Forums

(i must check in the name of kek)
Well put user