It's real

nytimes.com/2016/07/26/opinion/hillary-this-is-why-democrats-are-still-struggling.html?_r=0

This should be "spook" at this rate. Actually, "disagreeing with me" functionally corresponds with the same buzzword.

the difference: one of them has institutional power, the other was made up by Holla Forums

Wait a min-

kek, Thomas Frank was right again. He's Thomas Friedman tier with worshiping the professional/creative classes and mindless blather about the proles just "educating" themselves out of poverty

If Holla Forums keeps calling you a fascist you should probably take your fascist shitposting back to Holla Forums

Who is the man in the window?

Lacan

...

...

Yes having a diverse lineup is going to bring impoverished minorities out of poverty.

Fucking kill me

All you did was prove that you were triggered by the image.

It's pretty much trickle-down repacked for women and minorities

This whole entire debate is falsely framed as one identity being "norm without", and worth fighting for to get rid of identity. Yet, you're still fighting for identity of this blank slate. It's inseparable. Beyond this, the way you argue for or against identity always involves threat to your own, though without you saying it, but arrogant/foolish enough to let it be known.

To begin with identity in the first place lost meaning decades ago.

There is no point arguing over the specifics of which you argue, against others who argue similarly, when the issue itself has not existed.

We want to eliminate the concept of capital. The bourgeoisie are the protectors of it, but if they "gave it up" there would be no issue.

The Democrats openly want their "demographic destiny", a coalition of urban women, working class mexicans and blacks in order to run the country with impunity. Go try talking to a "core" Democrat, they'll readily belittle you for being a "privileged white boy" that is either secretly a Republican, or a hipster. It's part of a larger strategy to displace class warfare with racebait garbage, so that bourgeois can remain unmolested.

And don't forget: this strategy works. It got Obama into the White House in 2008, and Democrats still maintain right now that it is impossible for any Republican to win the White House because they only appeal to white people. Which I find hilarious, as all the states that have recently gone red (Wisconsin, Michegan, Ohio and Pennsylvania) did so due to the Democrats' allowing their working class white base to erode into poverty.

Predominately white progressives are standing up to the party politburo, so they of course will be marginalized unless they fall back into line. Hispanics and blacks don't complain so they get the party's focus.

Which is totally hilarious, given that BLM sees the party for what it is now too. Notice how they did not get mentioned.

hey /r/the_donald

nice try jidf

Leftypol was right again.

She's clearly ignored that. Along with Kaine, she's pivoting hard to the right in the hope that she can pick up moderates who have already turned their back on the party. By the way, how many people are talking about "convention bumps" for Hilary like they did with Trump?

Irregardless of the pivot to the right, she could have at least presented a better message. Obama commanding everyone to "don't boo, vote" will result in Jill Stien giving the election to Trump like Nader did.

A Vox link that isn't archived is gulag worthy.

archive.is/hSryD

There's Biden

WORLD IS FUCK

you mean 2 years, because if Hilary actually does win (something I doubt), the GOP will easily obtain a supermajority in 2018

fuck that tbh fam. you don't have to let those cunts get into your head, and it will eventually pass.

i feel dem feels doe

That's a retarded image. The reason that Holla Forumsfags are the same as SJWs is because they use the same logical fallacies to justify their stupidity.

Now that's some hardcore double thinking going on.

muh brocialism

Leftypol is always right.

maybe not about Bern man, but besides that

surely you can see how the stuff you put in the boxes under leftypol is quite different from the other stuff, right?

Added

This is the worst image I've ever seen. Stop trying to be clever.

Forgot the header

Am I cleber yedddd

I fucking love this picture.

check your muh privilege

Creator of the other image here. I like yours better.

We want to eliminate the concept of cultural marxism. The Jews are the protectors of it, but if they "went to Israel" there would be no issue.

Except "le cultural Marxism" is a dumb conspiracy theory. Also the fallacy we talk about is you assume "the Jews" are a hive mind who are all complicit. The bourgeois class interest is to protect capital, but that doesn't mean that every single bourgeois is complicit and we would treat them as individuals first, bourgeois second.

Read a book tard. Cultural Marxism is just writings by these Jewish guys from the Frankfurt school about what proletariat culture would look like. It has nothing to do with the vague definition that show up in meme tier infowars articles.

Be careful debating him, when he starts losing he reports people for "fascism" and the mod is retarded enough to click [B].

Goes on to say
So is it a conspiracy or is it real? Because we're seeing it applied in the world right at the moment, that's what the idpol bullshit is all about.

my uncle works for nintendo.

never change, Holla Forums. youre just another echochamber always claiming other echochambers are echochambers

It's a conspiracy theory in the way you do it. It'd be the equivalent of me saying Mein Kampf was actually about the Dutch subverting Germany and Hitler was a plant for the Dutch to blame it on the Jews.

Feel free to read some of the books they wrote if you want. It has nothing to do with idpol oppression Olympics.

*Austrians

Follow your own advice.

The difference between you and SJW's compared to us, is that you look at things from a cultural basis and we look at things from a economic basis. It'd be fair to compare us to lolberts ideologically(because we are booth rooted in the economics), but there are way more commonalities between SWJ's and Holla Forums than us and SJW's.

Yeah, well Miyamoto is my dad. So fuck you.

I wasn't claiming that the Dutch were subverting you mong. I was saying that what you guys say about cultural Marxism is completely divorced from reality of the books you base it on. That's why I told you to read one.

im not from Holla Forums, and believe it or not, most "SJWs" are pretty class conscious, and looking at Holla Forums i dont see a single thread dedicated to teaching/discussing economics. once again youre making baseless assumptions from your biased position

Okay my mistake.

Anyway, we do talk economics but not nearly often enough. A lot of good threads get derailed by Holla Forums because we have no mods.

Also a lot of infighting goes on here between anarchist and Marxist so I wouldn't call it an echo chamber.

BUT CULTURAL MARXISM DONT REAL!

inb4 people responding thinking im insulting actual marxism, instead of this idpol perversion of it.

It's Existentialism. IdPol was never Marxist.

Caught one. Read the spoiler.