Are fascists better or worse than monarchists?

Are cucks worse or better than Hillary voters?

aw who am I kidding.

BERNIE 2016 amirite guys?

gah

take your meds.

I keep taking my meds.

But B████ still isn't president :'(

Try taking a lot of them at once and see if it helps.

I just did, but now I want to call everyone a facist.

I also lost 95% of my muscle mass.

anything anarchists dont like.
the definition of fascism changes overtime, along with everything else. this is what anarchists refuse to believe, forcing everyone to follow their definition and ignore all possible factors that caused things not to go the way they wanted. theyre afraid to defend socialist countries of the past and instead dismiss them all as "state capitalism" and calling everything by their buzzwords.

imo fascism isnt much different from a monarchy, aside from the leader is usually voted or couped into power, not passed down like monarchies do.

You know, calling them "state capitalism" isn't just some convenient way to dismiss anything I don't like.

You are right, you can also call a spook whatever you don't like.

Take more of them then. If Picollo Dick doesn't do it, try 50 sleeping pills.

"state capitalism" is in reference to the fact that the state took the role of the bourgeois in the role of controlling and expanding the MoP and this was something that was a constant throughout the history of the "state socialist" societies.

"spooks" are fixed ideas that people put ahead of their own self-interest.

So basically the definition of socialism.
merriam-webster.com/dictionary/socialism

I am referring to what said about how definitions keep changing in time.
Also the definition of socialism in my country is the same with the Merriam-Webster one.

Monarchists are an endangered species. Fascists may be on the brink of an uprising, so I'm gonna say fascists are worse.

I gasped.

It's a dynastic form of dictatorship, yes?

Europe and the USA were critical to angry with them for ~2 centuries, so they're now out of power and almost gone. [We basically stopped being actively angry but we don't want them back in power.]

But people can find anything romantic. Most definitely, many people surely also thought it was "romantic" to serve Kim Il-sung or Kim Jong-Il today.

You just need some patriotic writeups and music and other propaganda and boom, romance and muh patriotism-colored morals. Works for almost everyone, eh.

A bunch of monarchies were doing fine, some even great.

No fascist government ever did well for even two decades. You get a huge number of victims plus economic disaster. It is about as helpful as it would be to somehow turning half your population into all known sorts of dangerous and disruptive mental asylum patients.

yes, the state is the working class. Ebin.

apples.
oranges.

kek

Shit guys, your OC is pretty bad.

Nein.

Singapore and Japan.

Arguably, the other Asian Tigers (Hong Kong, Taiwan, South Korea) as well.

*British "humour"

This is a hard question, of course historically the fascists are the worst. Today the Saudi monarchy is one of the worst if not the worst tyranny in the world.

Thing is, we're not the ones changing definitions. If you read any major socialist/anarchist thinker in 19th century, they will tell you that socialism is when the workers seize the means of production.

Keep in mind that dictionaries merely record HOW people use words; it's not meant to capture the nuances of political theory. Thus decades of right-wing misconceptions ("hurrrr socialism is when gubmint does stuff!!") is going to have an effect on the dictionary definition, since it reflects how language is being used.

So it's not so much that the dictionary is wrong as much as you're just a retard for thinking you can gain an upper hand in an argument by looking up a word instead of reading political theory.

Intellectual laziness at its best; to the gulag with you.