I'M GOING TO GET INTERVIEWED FOR FULL FRONTAL WITH SAMANTHA BEE

some reddit S█████ thread.

Fucking auto complete

You better dress nice and have your hair look good and not stutter or else that is all anyone would mention later. Not sure what else I could ad to help out.

Good luck.

Tell them that Clinton is a tool for Global Capital and that she was in part responsible for the neoliberalism that helped destroy the country.

Yeah. And if you have bad skin, get some concealer for is ASAP.

kek, he's literally got less than 15 mins

Literally who/what

destroy the economy might be better phrasing

...

RIP.

Shave your hair and beard bud you need to do that

No

7.2/10 comrade, not bad

Haven't heard back about Sam Bee…

worse things have posted on imageboards.

Kek

Any comrade have any links to a stream or something?

When does it open?

Bring up Honduras and how the woke slay queen colluded with porky to suppress a minimum wage increase in Haiti.

Same, am retarded and can't find it

THIS

Sorry guys Periscope network is FUCKED right now.
Can't do live. Will upload GoPro footage later. My Periscope ID is same as twitter. Still waiting for response on Sam Bee.

that's cool. remember webms and mp4s are uploadable on 8ch

Good luck comrade!

this is gonna be like the Ghost radio graffiti episode all over again

If it happens tbh

God dammit those Hiberians are tampering with the Periscope network

I've done one interview already (not Sam Bee) and been offered some more.

Can you slip a "We are coming bucko" somewhere in your interview?

Alright. Phone is dying. I will update later tonight.

WЭЯЕ СФMING BЦСКФ

At the end you have to say WE'RE COMIN BUCKO

Be careful fam.
That bitch be tricky.

Maybe bring up how corporations shouldnt fund campaigns and that it isn't right how third parties don't have a fair shot up against the two parties in such a rigged system.

I can only give you meme magic fellow comrade. plus my computer crashed last week

This.

Stay calm. Don't let her bait you. Don't say stupid shit.

Careful.
She may pull some tricks to make you look like an idiot.
She's knee deep idpol and not too fond of B████ supporters.

youtu.be/JrGlaUo4JEE

Mentioning how much Bill gutted welfare and how shillary stood behind him is always good if she tries to bait you into she is le progressive meme

raep her

DO IT
SHAVE NIGGA SHAVE

I like his beard.

Shaving goes against Islam

Can you stream to a different website?

If idpol comes up somehow whatever you do dont say it's not important or not as important or you will be portrayed as a racist, sexist, homophobe. Say that those issues are largely caused by capitalism.

Tell her you're voting Trump because B████ can always run again in four years.

Ask her thoughts about Marxist Feminism.

As in, the belief that the oppression of women comes from the material economic conditions of Capitalism and not necessarily cultural values.

don't fucking do this.

go away Holla Forums

Women didn't have it that great under feudalism either fam. I don't think those issues are exclusively tied to capitalism.

Capitalism and feudalism have a lot more in common then they do with socialism

there's literally no reason to bring feminism into this

Capitalism in great part needs to sustain certain gender roles (men as labour power, women as those who birth and care for future labour power) to sustain itself and to keep a bunch of market niches. That's not to say patriarchy is a fundamental pillar of capitalism, nor that if we eliminated patriarchy capitalism would go to shit. But capitalism, as did feudalism, in great part maintains and legimitizes patriarchy (one through the market, other through religion and culture).

True.

It's a bad talking point because the other party can point to other socioeconomic systems that had similar problems. It would require too much time to qualify what you mean.

...

...

Samantha is a designated liberal feminist, you retard.

Nodanargument.

than*

I will never understand why people mix these up. 'Than' is for comparisons while 'then' is for order of events

Ask her why she's funny as a car wreck

That's what I was getting at, which is why it would be reasonable to bring, but makes a valid point, and of course the producers would definitely spin it this way.

My mistake, I realized that as soon as posted it but I didn't think it was necessary to correct myself.

Not sure if you're a Holla Forums or /liberty/ crossposter, but I don't see how anybody could deny that capitalism upholds at least some patriarchal gender roles.

I'm not saying it doesn't do this, but it's a mistake to call it "patriarchy", which implies that it somehow fucks women over less than men, or that there aren't women that fuck over men and women alike. It's called capitalism, and it doesn't keep women in the kitchen, it keeps them at work, just like the men, for exploitative wage labor. Patriarchy is a myth.

Is it going to be an interview like one of those they did for the Daily Show? Where they pick someone who isn't very eloquent, heavily edit it and make his side look stupid?

Dear lord, you're stupid. Patriarchy implies literally the opposite.

No it doesn't imply that either, you can have anomalies in any system but the vast majority of women will always be a disadvantage because of their jobs as caretakers or their tendencies to pick important careers that Capitalism doesn't value.

Women are exploited even more so than men. Women make 20 cents less than men do. The professions that women take, such as nursing, teaching, etc. are all incredibly valuable jobs to society and yet, Capitalism pays close to minimum wage for those jobs. Both sexes get exploited but women get exploited even more so.

It implies that it's run by men to the benefit of men. This is simply not true.

Well, this is obviously false. Women aren't excluded from anything.

Women do not have to be caretakers in capitalism, thus falling birth rates in western nations.

This isn't something imposed on women. Women could always just pick other jobs. That is not to say that this is fair.

Nope.

More lying through statistics. Women earn less than men on average. However, if women really did this, then they'd be hired more often than men. Capitalism doesn't care about what's between your legs.

But women don't have to pick these jobs. Neither do men, and yet many men do such things.

Nope. Again, capitalism doesn't care about your junk. It's going to fuck you in the ass regardless with as much force at it can get away with.

Is "kyriarchy" better?

Great. Just like every other single thread.

And capitalism came about in male dominated societies. Which produced cultural norms that discriminated against women and kept them out of the workforce for generations. The codified barriers have been lifted but the social artifacts remain. Do women predominantly choose these jobs that society values less out of pure coincidence? Or have they been socially conditioned to follow these career paths? And do these jobs pay less because they were historically jobs held by women?

Except we don't live back then. Capitalism now exploits women the same. If anything, capitalism has worked against social norms and made working women the new normal. Capitalism changed society, not the other way around.

Like?

Maybe they like those jobs. I don't think women choose cheaper jobs because of an evil patriarchal conspiracy. Maybe they just find those jobs more rewarding. They are obviously free to choose otherwise and many women do.

That doesn't seem like it's the case. Countries that are fare more "feminist" like Sweden have even bigger gaps in the workforce like this. Why is this? Maybe because women are free to choose what they really want without worry about how to pay the bills. I don't think it will be any different in socialism.

No, they pay less because that's the market rate of that labor. Teaching used to be a male profession, yet it doesn't pay any better. Capitalism doesn't choose to fuck you more based on gender. It fucks you over as much as it can, no matter what your junk is.

You are clearly confusing the term with Matriarchy. But keep on with the damage control.

Dictionary fallacy, you'd rather cherry-pick definitions instead of admitting that women are much more heavily disadvantaged because they have to raise the children. Therefore, they are indirectly excluded from many opportunities that don't allow for this.

Wow, are you now advocating for human extinction then? You'd rather justify punishing women for raising kids properly instead of saying there's something wrong with Capitalism.

Imposed or not imposed, it is happening for whatever cultural or economic reason. Therefore women are being exploited more. Therefore you have a patriarchy. Under Socialism, it would be possible to remove this dynamic. Under Capitalism, it is impossible.

Where did I lie? Can you not read? I never said women were paid less for the same work, I said women make less than men do. That is fact. We value the careers women pick less than careers that men pick. EVEN THOUGH, their careers are arguably just as important if not more. Further evidence of a system that favors men.

And yet they do, so patriarchy.

Capitalism cares about the career you pick and whether you choose to raise kids. This dynamic would be close to absent under Socialism.

TLDR: You are trying to argue that women being disadvantage isn't imposed purposefully EVEN THOUGH it is happening anyway and will continue to under Capitalism.

TAKE YOUR BULLSHIT TO A DIFFERENT THREAD YOU FAGGOTS

No because women are overwhelmingly more exploited than men are.

My bad. Sorry compañeros.

drink bleach

COINTELPRO pls go

Nope. You're talking about a thing, so we must agree to what it means. That's the only definition I know of patriarchy. What definition do you have?

Literally the first thing that comes up when you fucking google it.

Women do not have to raise children, as evidenced by falling birthrates.

Only if they choose to have children. Nobody is forcing them.

No, I'm saying that capitalism allows for such a thing, though. This is called a contradiction of the capitalist system.

But that's my point, retard. It's capitalism not patriarchy. How fucking dumb are you?

Yeah, it's called choice.

No, the people that choose those jobs get paid less, but that's capitalism. Or do men in those professions earn more?

No, it's as much exploitation as is allowed by the system. Men are exploited in other ways. You ever notice that most homeless people are men? That most deaths on the job are men? Capitalism is the cause of this.

That's not what patriarchy means. Women choosing lower paying jobs is not patriarchy. That doesn't mean it's correct, but that's capitalism for you.

Under socialism women will probably work less or choose the same jobs because they won't have to worry about not starving.

Again, that's my point. Capitalism is the problem. There is no patriarchy.

I would call that misleading at the very least, if not an outright lie. Women aren't a collective and neither are men. I certainly don't benefit from the fact that most CEOs are men, nor would you benefit (assuming you're a woman) from Hillary being president. You are not a single organism with the rest of your gender.

You've got that ass backwards. Women pick careers that are already less valued. If both men and women started choosing exactly opposite of how they do now, we would not suddenly see the wages of teachers and nurses rise dramatically. These are market forces at work, and whether you like them or not, they are a thing under capitalism.

And so is the job of the garbage man, yet you don't see them making more than some over-paid CEO. Capitalism does not put values on things based on social necessity.

No, it's further evidence of a system that favors profit margins and the bottom line. If teachers and nurses became scarce, their wages would rise. Because they are not, their wages are low.

And again, how does this disadvantage women? They can certainly pick different careers.

So they do, but that isn't patriarchy. Patriarchy implies the system is built so that they must do that, which it simply is not. It's not patriarchy; it's capitalism.

And it will reward you for not raising kids. Congratulations, now you know why we must get rid of it.

Correct, women would likely work less because working in the home would be an important task. Or maybe child-rearing would be outsourced. This may yet happen in capitalism.

And I'm right about that.

Because that's the way capitalism works. This isn't the work of da patriarchy.

...

Yes, that's called cherry-picking. Patriarchy can be any economic or social system that overwhelmingly favors men over women. Whether intentional or not.

Doesn't matter, they do and it's a practice that shouldn't be punished, you mongoloid.

Right, we should all just ignore human nature.

You have no point whatsoever. Capitalism perpetuates a patriarchy, you'd rather lie about the numbers then accept that.

Doesn't matter, it's still happening. The choices women make are exploited more so under Capitalism. Thereby creating unequal opportunity and perpetuating a patriarchy.

Yes, and those people are overwhelmingly women. Women are getting exploited much more than men on average.

Not to the degree women are, this is fact.

Yes it is, you retard. Women are paid less for the same amount of labor or more. A nurse is just as valuable if not more to a society then a video game designer is. A nurse can be the difference between life or death and yet, we pay them close to a minimum wage. The fact that we punish women more so than men, is patriarchy.

Drink bleach.

...

Need I say more?

Except capitalism doesn't do this. Nice job in proving that you're retarded on the opening line. Capitalism favors profit. If women want to make more money, they need to be profitable. Don't like it? Too bad. That's capitalism. Stop trying to make shit up to suit your idiotic "hurr da patriarchy" line, you stupid cunt.

I guess it was inevitable.

Anyway, no Samantha Bee. I'm sorry to disappoint you guys but I never got a text after the "15 minutes" one. On the other hand the place was crawling with reporters and researchers. I did a few other interviews.

My battery life was FAR shorter than I expected so I didn't capture that much with the GoPro. They didn't let us get close to the Wells Fargo center but I got to see the delegates. About 15% (optimistic) were at least vaguely supportive. They were going in to do a voice vote since it became a contested convention.

I talked to several people about Socialism and even met a fellow /leftypoler/. Most were surprisingly receptive. There are some socialist orgs here that I am going to see about visiting.

Men earn 20 cents more on average and have more freedom and opportunity because women are the designated caretakers. We value the careers they pick, teaching, nursing, etc., a hell of a lot less even though, they require just as much labor value if not more.

So you just admitted women aren't as profitable because of Capitalism and yet, you're refusing to see how Capitalism is sexist. Even though, women provide the same amount of labor and value to society.

You. need. to. drink. some. bleach.

Capitalism is patriarchal in practice, that is my entire point. If you refuse to see that reality, you need to go back to Holla Forums. It hurts women on average more than men and you are lying to yourself if you can't accept that.

Women with no children usually make the same is their male colleagues for the same labor. If you're talking about different careers it's like the other guy said it's just market forces at work. They get away with whatever they can pay the workers for their work based on market demand. For example the average lawyer's salary and job security has been falling rapidly due to over-saturation and outsourcing. It's not the "patriarchy". It's just capitalism at work. Patriarchy is not a boogeyman term for everything bad that happens to women. It's a specific social structure with certain roles and material conditions that largely don't exist anymore in the western world.

Not him but isn't this obviously his point?

Men have children too retard, it doesn't effect their salary.

Men dominating women (along with other men and boys) is as old if not older than class society, and it is much older than Capitalism. Read Marx faggot.

Because they work more and make more profit.

Nobody designated them as caretakers, you stupid idiot.

Then they should stop picking those. Guess what, they are. Profit-motive does this.

That's not how labor is valued in capitalism. It's valued through profit it makes. Nice job being retarded. All of this is simply capitalism being capitalism. You're just too hung up on muh patriarchy to see that.

I guess in your eyes, weighlifting is sexist because women can't lift as much weight. Gravity is fucking sexist because women are disadvantaged in respect to men, even if it's not intentional.

Oh, my god, everything is sexist and patriarchal, including the very laws of the universe!!!

Bougie pig detected, maybe women in the top .1% get treated the same but the rest of us women are as oppressed as ever. Who cleans the toilets at your Daddy's company?

No its not, its valued by supply and demand.Some of the most profitable labor is very low paid because any one can do it. In fact the higher end jobs tend to be less profitable because the labor is so expensive.

READ MARX NIGGA

...

You get treated the same as a man by the system. Capitalism is the problem, not your delusions of a patriarchy.

If that was true, nurses and teachers would be getting paid a lot more.

Yes and they favor men over women.

Market demand =/= societal demand. The market demand is sexist in practice because it demands the sex most willing to abandon care-taking, socializing, the arts, teaching, etc. This constitutes a patriarchy because it gives that sex more of the money, power, and freedom which can then be used to hold over other people, in this case, women. We see this all around us.

"The capitalism rewards those who contributes the most" meme, Nice job.

Doesn't matter, they are. Women are better equipped and biologically more willing to nurture and raise kids.

Right, so no teaching or nursing in your perfect world. Nice argument,

That's the point, you ape, I am saying Capitalism favors the careers men pick over the ones women do. This perpetuates a patriarchy.

Yes and they don't carry the children to term nor are they bound to a child because they don;t give birth to them. That's why they're are more single mothers then single fathers. Men just work harder and spend less time with their families when they have kids to provide for them. Women tend to do the opposite. Nothing prevents women from foregoing motherhood to focus on their career. By all accounts younger women are doing just that.

Yes and the majority of men are just as oppressed as they ever been too. Most men are not wealthy members of the ruling elite and have no say in our society just like women. We don't live in a patriarchy and we haven't in a long time. It's funny that you're calling me porky when you're trying to act like all women are more oppressed then men is a group in our society. Oh and women aren't as "oppressed as ever". Women are free to own property, vote, receive college degrees, have jobs,inherit property, run for public office and no longer require a man to function in our society.

S-show tits?

No it favors what ever creates the most capital and cost the least profit. The jobs women tend to enjoy don;t tend to produce the same kind of capital or have the same kind of demand that carers men pick tend to. If a plague killed 80 percent of the teachers out of existence right now. I guarantee you those that remained would be paid a lot more.
Why is that? Is their some law that stops teachers and nurses from having children I don't know about.
content.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,2015274,00.html

How many men get raped compared to women? How many men are victims of domestic violence compared to women? How many male prostitutes are there compared to female prostitutes?

Face it, the Patriarchy is real, it's probably the oldest system of oppression and it sucks for men too. It is why men are victims (and perpetrators) of so much violence, and its why men are valued by their salary above all. None of us will be free until we tear that system down along with Capitalism and all the other systems of oppression.

The "anti-idpol" shit around here is great, but I feel like idiots take it to mean that their gamer gate infographics are true. Feminism is a great movement when it hasn't be diluted by liberals, and its necessary if we are to be free.

See:

By your own logic, gravity is sexist because men can lift more than women.

Much more.

About the same

Who knows. How many male homeless compared to female homeless?

Haha, you're so wrong, I'm getting you to defend Capitalism.

Right, and that's men. It will always be men. Even though, women contribute just as much labor value, if not more, to society. And so women, on average, will come 2nd to men. That's patriarchy perpetuated by Capitalism. This is a dynamic that will only go away under Socialism where the Labor theory of Value will compensate both sexes equally and provide equal opportunity. This is why, I'm a Marxist Feminist. The only argument I made was that Capitalism helps to perpetuate a patriarchy. Which is why, even in countries with strong maternal policies and benefits, the pay gap is never dissolved.

It's a bourgie movement for bourgie women. Kill yourself, class traitor.

Where is your argument comrade?

Also way or the two of your to derail an interesting thread. Nice job retards.

slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2014/04/male_rape_in_america_a_new_study_reveals_that_men_are_sexually_assaulted.html

telegraph.co.uk/men/thinking-man/10752232/Our-attitude-to-violence-against-men-is-out-of-date.html

Are we counting prison rapes or are prisoners less than people in your eyes?

According to the CDC men are actually more likely to be victims of DV or IPV as they call it (intimate partner violence).

Most men are the inverse of a prostitute. They are forced to exchange money for an intimate relationship. The fact that people don't see lonely (I.e. alienated) johns as victims of capitalism is because most people don't give a shit about men. People by and large are taught to see sex as something a man does to a woman rather than something two people do together, so nobody considers that the men are being exploited here.

No it's not, Feminism is a tool for recognizing problems of gender inequality.

Liberal Feminism is a Bourgie Movement because it only scratches the surface of what causes this inequality.

Marxist Feminism is built on Feminism AND Marxist theory. Therefore, enacting Marxist Feminist change is in the direct interest of the proletariat.

Capitalism favors men over women.

I'm not defending capitalism. I'm refuting your moronic claim that we live in a patriarchy when we clearly don't. Capitalism does not have to be patriarchal and it's modern form it isn't. I'm a transhumanist and a socialist. So , I don't support wage slavery, the nuclear family, or parents raising their children. Acknowledging how modern capitalism functions is not the same is condoning it's practices.

But they don't generate the same amount of capital as men do or trend towards jobs that create a lot of capital. I wanted to be a chemist but modern capitalism doesn't support long term investments and the field is saturated with skilled professionals. It's awful but it's not because society hates chemists. They're just doing what they can get away with and what makes sense for market demand and generating the most capital in the shortest amount of time.

Hasn't prostitution existed since long before capitalism? Women are biologically oppressed - they're weaker physically and their bodies bear the burden of childbirth. Nature itself is oppressive to women.

Whereas men are stronger and therefore better suited to serving as warriors and dying in combat. You don't get to say men aren't oppressed because muh warrior honor any more than someone can say women dying from childbirth isn't oppression because muh joy of motherhood.

Opposed to a little fun?

Feminism isn't in my best interest. It's just a female supremacy movement fixated on a superficial characteristic of the wealthy elite. It's no different from the standard Zionist conspiracy theory.

Even in a peaceful utopia women will carry and birth children. They will still have uteruses that bleed every month.

Yup, nature gave women a raw deal and it sucks, that doesn't mean we have to continue living by that. They're stuck with the burden of childbirth at the moment (but maybe in the future they won't be), but they're also stuck with the burden of child rearing when they don't have to be. Don't let nature be a spook.

Then you are in denial or you have no idea what a patriarchy is. I already gave plenty of examples of how women are disadvantaged economically. If you can't accept that reality then there's nothing more to say on this topic.

You already made this exact same argument, you autistic ape. I don't care why Capitalism favors the career choices that it does.

The fact of the matter is, Capitalism favors the choices men make over the choices women make. This will never change. Capitalism perpetuates patriarchal norms and it exploits women much more than men on average.

Nah, in Utopia we'll grow people in tubes. What kind of Utopia still has natural childbirth?

Transhumanism doesn't exist yet. Millions of years of biology have influence a woman's role in society. How can you now understand that?

Maybe someday sure we'll all grow in tubes but that's not our reality today and it never has been.

The patriarchy is largely why so many men are lonely and sexless. No gay man has any trouble getting laid, if straight guys weren't obsessed with calling women sluts all the time they'd have the same situation.

Also get the spooks out of your head and read what you wrote again. The other end of that situation is that most women are forced to have sex with men they don't like, who beat them in many cases, just so they can live. Patriarchy hurts both but women clearly have the worse end of that deal.

And men will die younger from testosterone adversely affecting cardiovascular health. There are all sorts of little things that are better or worse for one sex over the other. The point is that both have it bad. Arguing about who has it worse is retarded because you're comparing vastly different things. For fuck's sake some women have really bad periods while others have very light ones. Individual variation is a huge part of it.

They'll also continue to have higher libido (generally) that puts them in a compromised position where women can force them to trade something for intimacy. Even if we abolish other markets, the sexual market would still exist unless we also got rid of the scarcity (women overall having less interest in sex) inherent in our biology.

Btw transhumanism can fix all of this.

You said Utopia, anything can happen in Utopia.

But in the world we live in now childbirth isn't all that bad. Women don't even have to have periods unless they're trying to get pregnant.

We're way beyond might makes right in our society, we live in a world dominated by weak Jews where the strong Blacks are the lowest of the low.

The material conditions of the way male and female bodies are constructed explains why Patriarchy exists, but not why it should continue to.

Bernie runs and underdog campaign against "the establishmeny", turns out the DNC was working to control what Cnn and Msnbc put out, clearly chose Hillary early on, paid people to go to protests, and tried to plant negative stories about S█████. The party actively sabotaged S█████, the 2nd most popular candidate in the primary. They never gave a shit about the voters, they had their choice from the beginning.
It makes very clear that any idea of the DNC as fair and nuetral is hogwash, they're just as corrupt as everything else in politics. Don't forget, from day one B████ said it was a movement not a candidate. His supporters don't give a damn about the party or Hillary, they give a damn about having a real democracy and the DNC clearly doesn't.

This is the kind of themes you should hit.
The DNC doesn't give a fuck about voters and has actively undermined democracy.

Who is arguing here that women should be relegated to child rearing? My position is that women can choose the degree to which they have a career. From full time housewife to single career woman for life, all options are open assuming she has a higher class. Women tend toward certain roles because of personal preference, which has a lot to do with ability, which has a lot to do with biology. You don't see scrawny dudes doing construction work or pro football for the same reason.

Pre-Capitalism it was women who had higher libidos than men. If you want to talk biology men bust a nut and want a sandwich, women can go for hours and hours cumming multiple times and have an amazing time. "The Sexual Market" is a modern fiction. Its modern patriarchy that tells all men to have sex with as many women as possible and all women to have sex with as few men as possible. Get rid of it and we'll have much fewer issues.

Come on dude. The men who call women sluts all the time have issues beyond the standard. Men who don't do that still have higher libido than their female partners mist of the time. It's not like in a relationship the two people fuck whenever either one wants to. They both have to be into it and women usually are not in the mood as often as men. This is just a matter of the male/female dynamic. The female has more biological investment and tends to be more discretionary about when to risk causing pregnancy.

Yes, I work in construction and most of the workers are scrawny Mexicans, and pro football players are uneducated niggers who die horrible deaths at 40 because of the damage their occupation gave them. The powerful men in our society make powerpoints.

Power and physical strength are not the same thing.

This.

It has been long proven that female orgasms are significantly more pleasure than male. If both societal notions discouraging sex for women and encouraging sex for men were done away with, you'd do away with the "sexual market". THERE WILL BE NO KISSLESS VIRGINS UNDER COMMUNISM

Personally, I feel that I fug lots of women because it makes me feel superior and I feel as if I "have" to. Otherwise I'd regret it later in life

And you keep making the same argument that society just doesn't value female labor because it's" patriarchal". When it clearly has more do with what makes the most profit in the shortest amount of time then sexism. I'm going to keep repeating the same responses if you keep using the same silly arguments

No you didn't. All you did was regurgitate the usual wage gap crap. A women of the same economic background has the same opportunities of a man of her economic background. No one's stopping women from getting jobs in high paying fields or foregoing motherhood to focus on their careers. Which is not something you can say about patriarchal societies being a wife and mother are pretty much your only opinion if you're a woman in a patriarchy.

That's how I know we don't live in one. In a patriarchy women cannot function without the aid of her husband or father, cannot own property or inherit property and is restricted from having the same rights a man does. We don't live in one and we haven't in a long time. Like I said previously, we don't live in a patriarchal society just because bad things happen to women. Men are fucked over by the legal system, family courts, and its legal to mutilate our genitals. We're also falling behind in education compared to women. That doesn't prove we live in a matriarchy either.

Yeah that a load of crap that isn't supported. Women are sexually selective because it cost a lot of energy and resources to make a baby. They don't want to waste their time on a loser with crappy genetics and no resources.

Aaaand that's not at all my argument but I guess that's what happens when you're a reactionary brocialist who used to browse Holla Forums all the time. kys

The following are 3 separate things.

I've never made a post on Holla Forums and I've posted on Holla Forums for over a year. I don't know why you would even think that.My stances on these issues are pretty common on this board. The fact that you don't know that suggest to me that you're a new fag. Also no one here considers "brocalist" an insult. This isn't r/socialism.

Pretty sure r9k isn't lonely because they call women sluts. They're lonely because women don't want them, as they have nothing to offer them.

Women aren't going to start fucking ugly guys that have no personality because of feminism. That is never, ever going to happen.

Guy, you're retarded.

How stupid are you?

Has the vid been posted yet?

Do you really think that the way a person's sexual desire and attraction is 100% "natural"?
Do you think maybe it is shaped by society to any degree?
Have you ever thought that that if you were raised differently you wouldn't be a fat virgin that sits and play dota all fucking day?
Or do you actually accept the notion that you born a "beta male" and you are "naturally" a loser?

It's mostly natural. I can assure you that r9k wouldn't get laid either in capitalism or communism.

Kek Yeah right m8. The only thing modern society is stopping is women from forming harems with the best men around. The best thing we can do for men under communism is invent sex bots and high quality virtual reality porn.

I think this difference is the single most underappreciated fact about gender. To get that kind of difference, you had to have something like, throughout the entire history of the human race, maybe 80% of women but only 40% of men reproduced.

Right now our field is having a lively debate about how much behavior can be explained by evolutionary theory. But if evolution explains anything at all, it explains things related to reproduction, because reproduction is at the heart of natural selection. Basically, the traits that were most effective for reproduction would be at the center of evolutionary psychology. It would be shocking if these vastly different reproductive odds for men and women failed to produce some personality differences.

denisdutton.com/baumeister.htm

It's like, fucking birds, man. The male's are often flashy and extreme just to be able to get the boring brown females' attention. Same goes for any species where one sex has a much greater biological burden. They will evolve so that that sex (female) exercises greater discretion because that means less investment of resources and higher chance of offspring surviving.

What happened to the interview?

See this post

ITT: Proof that idpol fucks everything up
Get out

The incessant idpol circlejerking shat all over any meme magic that we could possibly conjure. Congratulations faggots.

I'm tired of hearing this just world fallacy horseshit. It paints low status and undesirable men as entirely deserving of their lot in life, as if you could ever know how they think of women. It is literally the same argument made by bourgie fucks that think that anyone who doesn't retire with a million dollars has no one but their self to blame, that it's just due to their 'culture' or laziness as opposed to it being due to their 'toxic masculinity' or 'misogyny'. It's completely tone deaf.

everytime lmao. now get out you ruined this thread, if you wanted an argument about feminism you should have made your own thread.

That's literally all the Daily Show interviews ever do. If you agree to an interview for them prepare to be punked. That's the entire point.

Who let the fucking feminists onto Holla Forums?

Idpol is fucking cancer

Source on that?

(@BossIgnostic): twitter.com/BossIgnostic?s=09

Sorry I posted so late guys. I had car trouble and will be driving home tonight. Right now, however, I am going to march up to Roosevelt Park where the biggest protest is happening today. I will be streaming with Periscope again and filming with the GoPro. Battery should last this time. Afterward I'm going to take the subway downtown where the Socialist Convergence is happening.

I figured out what was wrong. The link will post to twitter now.

Noice

Boss Ignostic (@BossIgnostic): twitter.com/BossIgnostic?s=09

I will be streaming the Socialist Convergence in a few minutes when it starts. It goes until 10 pm EST and then I will be going. home to get the car fixed. The stream will post to twitter.

pre-civilazation = pre-capitalism

DO YOU EVEN ENGELS?

I'm filming as much of the q&a as I can with GoPro. Didn't know anything about the Socialist Convergence going in. I may leave when my GoPro dies because anything at the DNC is probably more interesting to see than nothing which is what I could record staying here.

Phone battery bout to die is the reason.

...

ok, I've seen this shit one time too many.

WTF is all this "the creator" BS?

Ok, sure. The universe is a simulation, all data is collected in black holes, we cannot escape the simulation, we do not exist after the simulation is over, it doesn't matter that it is a simulation.

…

WTF is this shit, though???

Pretty interesting shit, actually.

...

beep boop

really interesting read, thanks

He's written a whole book on the subject if you're interested.

...

At what point in this thread did we say we like her or supported her you moron. He's just trying to shill are ideology and fuck with her.