Jim Profit is not on leftypol anymore, he's become a mercenary for Milo

facebook.com/assignedmale/photos/a.305470909635180.1073741828.300503316798606/571964056319196/?type=3&theater

And set his targets on tranny webcomic writer/activist Assigned Maleā€¦ apparently.

As you all know Milo was banned from Twitter for life. I'm not surprised Jim would side with Milo for that, I know how he hates moderators. I don't get what the end game here is attacking SJWs for him though. Unless it's sort of a I'll scratch your back you scratch mine sort of thing. Who even knows anymore?

Pic related is going to be him when he realizes the alt right basically is just SJWs that replace the word triggered with cuck.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=wPLP8B5G3-I
journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0016885
healthline.com/health/low-testosterone/effects-on-body#Circulatory-System
youtube.com/watch?v=YRuUFR1EnAE
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Body_integrity_identity_disorder
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_differentiation_in_humans
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XY_sex-determination_system
politicops.com/pat-robertson-orlando-shooting-gods-punishment-scotus-sex-marriage-ruling/
who.int/genomics/gender/en/index1.html
gendercare.com/library/italiano_paper1.html
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17992150
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07520.x/full
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2303.2009.00663.x/abstract?systemMessage=Wiley Online Library will be unavailable on Saturday 30th July 2016 from 08:00-11:00 BST / 03:00-06:00 EST / 15:00-18:00 SGT for essential maintenance.Apologies for the inconvenience.&userIsAuthenticated=false&deniedAccessCustomisedMessage=
en.wiktionary.org/wiki/neovagina
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

That was a pretty edgy email.

Yeah, good riddance.

...

seriously, thats Holla Forumstier ironic-but-sorta-sincere edgemastery

god I hate that stupid shoe0nhead cunt

top fucking kek, what is wrong with this guy

No real loss there. Profit is and always was a fucking moron. I never really got the hype.

no thank you

He was banned here and launched a tirade against the board, but then some months later returned pretending like nothing happened.

Hahaha. He is an idiot who doesn't know what they are talking about, and people like him and unhruhue need less threads about them.

I watched just one of his videos and he just seemed like a right-wing dunderhead, not surprised.

m8 u beder step off muh waifu

Where are the GGers to defend this as rational anti-idpol

I've literally never seen or heard of a waifu worse then yours. Total honesty.

That's not a bad thing, actually. Have you read the comics? Pics related.

...

3rd comic is pretty accurate. The right likes to bash queers until they can use a tragedy to shape discourse in their candidate's favor.

Guess I'll have to give you that one.

...

I love seeing so many narcissistic SJW's in this thread whining about trans people.
Why don't you all go fuck off back to Reddit and join SRS and r/anarchism/rsocialism and r/shitliberalssay and whine about how you all are "oppressed".
I swear western children are so delusional.
Real oppression, not this whiny, bitchy "you don't want to hear me whine about how i'm a trans demi sexual, that identifies as a black otherkin that's always 'oppressed' by cis people".

I wouldn't mind seeing fascists kill off these SJW's and some of these whiny, bitchy transgendered people. Maybe once they and their SJW supporters die, we can finally focus on implementing a fucking communist society instead of this hug box "Let's whine about oppression some more and bitch about how our critics are cis white male reactionaries, and babble on about useless feminist and post colonial theories".

Call the waaaambulance.

Like they'll stop there.

...

Please explain why whiny transgendered people have it so hard, because not everyone is interested in sacrificing their live giving them pity or wanting to listen to these special snowflakes babble on about "oppression".

I think child soldiers in the Congo rank much higher on the oppression hierarchy than transgendered people.

I think the women that make shirts in factories with abysmal working conditions are more oppressed than transgendered people, and the SJW's that support them.

The comics where whining about "Us poor transgendered people have it so hard, not everyone is blindly willing to gullibly believe that we are another gender just because we feel like it".

I swear most transgender people have a neurological disorder.

It's a good start.
At least, they kill off one evil, and might provoke a retaliation from the masses.

I know, those dastardly trans people are going to trick us out of all our shekels Aryan gold to pay for their surgery!

You're presenting a false dichotomy. People can care about transgender issues and the problems of the developing world.

Not every trans person is like that, demanding pity or whatever. I wouldn't argue "more oppressed" anyways because it doesn't lead to solutions. And in the end, you didn't help those poor, oppressed Congolese, nor those women in factories with your post. Instead, you're whining.

...

I love when anons pretend to be trained in things psychiatric to justify their rabid animosity towards an Other.

...

You realize being transgender is a mental disorder??

...

Yet I love how Leftypol tries to justify said mental disorder.

...

What does justify even mean here? Can you not justify depression, or schizophrenia?

More.

If you admit that transgendered people have a mental disorder, then why do you justify having said disorder?

Define "justify"? You're probably thinking of "explain".

You say it like they can just stop being transgendered if they wanted. Would you say the same to someone with schizophrenia?

...

This guy puts his words into the mouths of imaginary children to push his agenda. Practically paedophilia.

...

I could be wrong but what I think user is saying by "justify" is that transgenderism is being normalized, rather than treated, in the context of a mental illness.

Instead of saying "you have a problem, you should seek professional help, like therapy" trannies insist that everyone else is the problem and want to reinforce their lifestyle, "There's nothing wrong with transgenderism, just be yourself! fuck teh haterZ! In fact, you should have surgery to remove your dick so you can become fully-woman!"

In the same vein, this isn't how depression, another mental illness, is received. People don't say "You're depressed? That's perfectly natural. It's WHO YOU ARE, and it makes you special. Don't get help, because there's nothing wrong with you. Be as depressed as you possibly can! fuck the haters who think it's a mental illness! In fact, you should have surgery to remove the happiness part of your brain so you can become fully-depressed!"

me antisexual aromantic asexual trans-hermaphrodite2genderless angelkin, rate

There's not much wrong with this tbh.
Agreed on everything else though.

this whole "allyship" bullcrap is beyond autistic

So getting surgery and hormone therapy isn't professional help?

I laughed.

Agreed.

People use "professional" as a synonym for therapist, psychologist, psychiatrist, etc. mental health fields.

Also
It's retarded that you make the comparison
When a MtF's dick is what often makes them unhappy.

You have to go to a mental health clinician and get a recommendation before you're allowed to go through with SRS. In both cases you see a professional.

bourgeois gays(and trans to an extent) have been accepted into today's culture for years why does it even fuckin matter ?

I think you misunderstand the comparison; the fact that they have gender dysphoria is the problem, not their dick. Hence, problems with the mind deserve help that will ease them, such as psychotherapy. It's not the case of physical ailments.

youtube.com/watch?v=wPLP8B5G3-I

Yeah, and the fact that people have depression is caused by their depression not their happiness. Nice truism. Again, hormone therapy and surgery are legitimate professional treatments for gender dysphoria.

Sounds like circular logic. Depression is caused by chemical inbalances, genes, and environmental factors.
If a person has a mental illness where they believe a part of their body feels "wrong" and they shouldn't have it all (keep it mind, this example is actually a REAL mental illness that exists) such as their legs, there's two ways to treat this: 1. cutting off their legs, or 2. getting psychotherapy and possible drugs to treat them so they won't feel that way anymore.

Which do you think is more beneficial to the person?

Gender Dysphoria is caused by chemical imbalances, genes, and environmental factors.

Pretty laughable m8. The reproductive system is one which you don't need to live at all. The complications from having no penis isā€¦nothing. The complications from having no legs isā€¦you can't travel quickly nor as efficiently as before, shorter, et c. So, you think it's not beneficial to be able to invert an organ to your satisfaction? The comparison should rather be like having a cyborg pussy, and getting bionic legs, because in theory it's more satisfying.

Also trans people do get psychotherapy as I've already explained and hormones their drugs.

Why should i care about trannies when they are least than 0,5% of the population?

I mean do whatever you want, cut your penis off and call yourself clara but don't expect me pandering to your kind.

Pretty laughable m8. The legs are an appendage you don't need to live at all.
You do realize they don't cut the entire dick off right? They reshape it into the form of a vagina. The turn the penis inside out. And it's very vulnerable to infection. Your body has an unnatural hole that it will attempt to heal requiring constant cleaning and extreme sensitivity. Have you ever watched a sex change surgery before? Urination becomes harder, the area is very sensitive and uncomfortable. Also they cut your balls off too, meaning no testosterone production.
Hit me back when cyborg pussies are a real thing.

Good, then they should stick to it instead of mutilating their genitals.

Study finds transexuals have higher rates of suicide after sex-change surgery
journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0016885

So cut your legs off. I'd be happier to see you.
Yes. That's what I was talking about with cyborg pussy.
Kinda the point.
Study also said sex reassignment alleviated gender dysphoria, and the conclusion was to inspire better psychiatric and somatic care after sex reassignment for this patient group.

Also, the reproductive system is the only total system that if removed you would still live.

Wew lad, what's with the hostility?
You seem to be missing all the benefits of testosterone
healthline.com/health/low-testosterone/effects-on-body#Circulatory-System
The point of the matter is that after the surgery risks increase, just because you try and make "encouragements" to compensate doesn't mean those risks could have been prevented beforehand had the surgery not taken place at all. The best course of action is no surgery and psychotherapy while also researching more into it. Again, we have to realize what they have is a mental illness, and like all mental illnesses, it must be treated within the context of the mind, and possibly brain in some cases not the body.

MtF do take testosterone including supplements post-orchi, but the amount the testicles produce if not suppressed by antiandrogens will bring back all the undesirable qualities for them like thicker hair, bigger pores, et c.
Nice back peddling.

thicker body hair*

Please don't strawman me. I'm arguing the treatment is not the best way to go about doing it. There's no reason to take a drastic treatment like SRS when other options are already available, I think this is the point you must have missed during the leg-amputation vs. psychotherapy comparison.

For another comparison, if you had the choice between taking a pill to cure something and having surgery to cure it, why would you choose the surgery over the pill?
Except I didn't. If you misunderstand something that's really not my problem.

And your missing all the problems with the comparisons you propose just because you have a conclusion you seek to prove at the outset. That you misunderstand isn't really my problem.

Excellent false dichotomy again between pill and surgery.

Also, are you prickly, by chance?

In that case, elaborate
it was a comparison. If there are different ways to treat gender dysphoria rather than psychotherapy, drugs, or SRS, then I would really like to hear it. Go onā€¦

Who?

top kek

It's not really worth it to elaborate anymore. Your ideology would have look at your own contradictions and think they translate into serious solutions. Lacking that, you write a solution anyway and pathologize what disagrees, as if you too were trained in medicine whether psychiatric or anatomical. I don't even know why I'm arguing about this here; a transgendered body is not a political category.

What is the problem here? 2 ways to treat this mental illness, psychotherapy/drugs or surgery. psychotherapy/drugs is non-invasive, surgery requires doing something that you can't reverse once it's done, and even if it does make you feel better, you've replaced one ailment with another because now you have higher risk for suicide, co-morbidity, and mortality; you think psychotherapy may relieve some of that? Perhaps, but if it doesn't, it has only suceeded in worsening the problem. You can't treat a dead body.

I am trying to help here, I want these people to get help. I don't want them to go through with SRS because the alternative is much less painful/lethal/has less complications medically.

You wanna throw out psychotherapy and drugs and skip straight to the surgery? Fine, then I guess at this point there's nothing I could say to change your mind. Do you REALLY think that this is going to help them?

They do. It's like people that want to cut off their limbs because they feel disabled. The correct course of action is treatment and accepting who you are, not cutting parts of your body off. If wearing a dress makes you feel better, then cool, I won't judge, but you're still a fucking guy and you need to accept that.

Exactly.

Have more shitty comics.

Nice strawman. And again what I'm talking about with the false dichotomies. It's possible (and not only possible, but is most of the cases, the other cases just doing hormones and not getting surgery) to do both and it be successful.

I might as well just come out and say it, that I'm trans, so no, you're not helping at all. You're just showing me how entrenched in bad ideology both the left and the right are.

You're still missing the point. psychotherapy/drugs or hormones or whatever is still preferable over surgery. Why can't you grasp this?
If you're post-op, then you have to understand that not everyone is like you. The statistics still shows us rates of suicide, co-morbidity, and mortality increase. Your anecdotal evidence means nothing in the scientific world.

If you're pre-op then I highly doubt it.

How is mutilating yourself a "success"? Seems to me like it's a failure to accept what you are.

And you're still missing the point that surgery is the goal with all transgender treatment, MtF or FtM. Staying on hormones for longer than you should leads to worse medical problems, like osteoporosis, coronaries, et cetera. So I guess we should say no to hormones too since they're scary and gonna cause problems. Then we can just do psychotherapy and CBS, and if I just think hard enough about it my gender dysphoria will go away :DDD wow just like depression.

Also, I'm not talking about anecdotes. I'm talking about the conclusions to the study you posted. They're the ones who said SRS alleviated gender dysphoria and their findings should inspire psycho- and somatic therapy in those patients.

Cool opinion.

It is my opinion, but I could be wrong. Why not tell me why you think it's wrong?

There's no definite cure for depression but that doesn't justify trying to use lobotomies and shock thereby to try and cure it. Feeding your delusions and mutilating your body isn't a "treatment".

I don't want to disgust people with my fantasy.

Nice projection. Because "all transgenders" means "you" right?
I would rather that then suicide
Clearly you don't understand modern medicine. It actually is possible to treat depression without resorting to drugs, and just doing psychotherapy. And you don't need surgery to treat depression, either, though it is a possible option, though not preferable.

Saying "SRS treats gender dysmorphia" and saying "All transgenders aspire to get SRS" are 2 different things.

Yep, there have never ever been successes in treating depression with external means, least of all drugs! Depressed people just need to stop being told they're depressed, it feeds their delusions, and if they think hard enough about it, they'll be happy.

youtube.com/watch?v=YRuUFR1EnAE

Looks like Jim has been making himself relevant again.

You're pretty insecure, fam.

I find it hilarious that apparently this kid and it's mom just shitpost on Tumblr all day, like wut.

I hope you're not trying to imply that psychotherapy is "being told that you don't have a problem/just be happy"

It was sarcasm, dolt.
I would definitely say that those not wanting to fully change themselves and instead just want to look pretty a few times are just transtrenders.

Tell me something I don't know.


And I hope you're not implying that SRS isn't a legitimate professional treatment.

The drugs don't work a 100 percent of the time and lots of people continue to suffer from depression with treatment. Different disorders require different treatments.
I don't even know what you're going with that strawman. The disorder is called gender gender dysphoria. It's feeding your delusions to give into the idea that you're a women. It's like you're saying that if you don't go along with the delusions of a schizophrenic you are not acknowledging that they have problems that need treatment.

#JimProfitMatters

I don't really need my ideas or to be fed that particular idea when other people already treat me like a woman.

Their mental illness is clouding what they really want, to not have gender dysmorphia anymore. They incorrectly believe SRS must be the solution.

Yeah, well, it's a shitty treatment. Just because it's "professional" in the sense that people are trained to perform it, and a "treatment" in the sense that it at least makes the problem go away (disregarding the consequences).

I don't see how this is considered treatment. This person is still clearly delusional and mentally ill.

You're still a man, a mutilated poor-excuse of a man, but a man nonetheless.

It was to mock your reasoning. I'd say it was worth it. Have you never heard sarcasm before?
It's either that, suicide, remain ready to be dysphoric, even if you can have a chance to cope later with psychotherapy, or get osteoporosis.


Thanks for your opinion again. It's really valuable to me.

I still hold that the comparison between wanting to cut off your legs because you feel disabled is much like wanting to cut off (most) of your dick because you feel like a woman.

Also I found the name of it, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Body_integrity_identity_disorder

They don't think "well let's wright the pro's and cons of how much better/worse my life will be if I cut off a body part" they think they have to dismember themselves because that's their mental illness. It doesn't matter if it's the legs, or a pinky. They shouldn't go through with the surgery, just do psychotherapy.

Nice quoting the wrong person.

Now you're the one with a false dichotomy. Why do you believe this can't be treated with psychotherapy/drugs alone?

Well
you wouldn't be disabled until after you cut your legs off.

He's actually right, you know. Getting SRS won't change your biology. Do you know what chromosomes are? You are still a man.

Drugs
Psychotherapy

That's not an opinion. It's a demonstrable fact.

I'm talking of using psychotherapy/drugs, and not doing the surgery, when you have gender dysphoria. Again, why do you think this is impossible?

I'm not talking AFTER doing the surgery.

But it didn't work. You used faulty logic. I say you wasted your time. Anyway I never said we had all he answers right now. I'm saying that SRS is a dead end and researchers should be focused on curing the disorder. Instead of feeding the delusions of the people suffering from it. I also find the entire thing vaguely homophobic and I think contributes to gender stereotypes. If a man wants to wear dresses and marry another man that's fine. He doesn't have to be a woman trapped in a man's body to want those things.

Or you can just fucking deal with it and carry on. You're such a pussy that you decided that mutilating yourself and pretending that your delusion is reality was a solution. The fact remains that you are not a woman and will never be one. Get some fucking help.

Mental illness isn't an injury, you don't just make it go away, you need to lean to live with it.

I'm talking about before the surgery too.

Hormone treatment/drugs
Psychotherapy


You don't know that. You don't know what I wear or how form speech. Fuck off with this hypocritical gender essentialism.


You're literally copying me. That's where I said you cope.

Mixed up replies again. Oh well.

And here you are advocating for mutilation. Nice job, retard. Clearly you didn't fucking deal with it.

I did deal with it. And I'm much happier. But you wouldn't know.

I don't agree with him but this word only makes you sound like you're paranoid over your own dick getting removed. All removal surgery is, by definition, mutilation.

In that case I would rather not go with hormones and stick to drugs, usually anti-depressants, side effects discontinue with ceased use and are rare.
Nice ass-pull. The psychotherapy is there to get rid of your dysphoria in the first place so you won't have it. Both preferable to surgery.
As in gender is just made-up.
Chromosomes are not a social construct, they're not a spook either.
Are you trying to tell us you're pre-op?

None of that matters. You're a man. You were born with a penis and xy chromosomes. A mutilated man in a dress is still just a man in a dress.

Nice misconstrual. I was referring to "gender stereotypes"

Whatever you have to tell yourself, buddy.

No, you didn't deal with it. You just fed your own delusion. You're still a man, and nothing you do will change that.

I'd say that this is, by definition, mutilation. Any surgery that isn't medically necessary should be called that.

And my delusion makes me happy :)

If you lose a limb because it gets too damaged, you are less able after it's removed.

It also makes you delusional, which isn't a positive trait in a person.

Tell me, do you fuck men? Do you tell them that you're a man? Or do you trick them? Or do you do this with lesbians?

Delusion under capitalist society is the norm, not the exception. You are not above this simply because one egregious example makes you uncomfortable.

Besides, there is zero psychiatric evidence that trying to make people with gender issues ignore them is effective in treatment. The transitioning thing simply works. It's odd, but it makes people more able to function.

Real classy, Holla Forums.

Not really comparable when you realize that trannies didn't have their dick or the rest of their body damaged. They purposefully fucked themselves up.

I'm "asexual".

So does that mean that we won't have trannies in socialism?

Doesn't matter, still counts.

Just because it offends you doesn't make it wrong.

It doesn't because your analogy is shit. You're grasping at straws now, m8. It's wrong because it's stupid logic, not because it offends me.

When you look at them put together like this you realise that if any of them were SJWs, the alt-Right would be using them to mock social justice, like they do with that fat feminist chick.

Except for that hottie at the bottom right

Lol

So now the truth comes out.

At least they're not saying SRS hasn't benefited anyone ever.

It has never benefited anyone, ever, because at the end of the day they have the same delusion and a mutilated body. The disease is still there.

What do you mean? I've had sex with girls before. Now I'm just not interested.

Nice projection.

If I say yes, will you stop caring? I'm not the tranny poster btw.

You sound awful buttblasted, fam.

You mean when you had a penis. lol


Lacking a cock and balls tends to do that to a man.


Wat, you're the one claiming special snowflake status, m8. I have sex with my wife, you know, because I'm not a fucking mentally ill faggot, lol.

Nope. Both before and after.
Gay as fuck tbh.

No, I'm honestly interested.

It's an appeal to consequence, a logical fallacy.

By that logic, disbelief in the ability of cancer to kill people makes us happy. Therefore, we should not believe cancer kills people.

This is a terrible way to live your life. Clearly you're not happy.

...

Todd is displeased with this thread.

That makes you celibate. Asexuality is the lack of sexual feelings towards any sex at all.

You're heterosexual and you choose not to have sex with women.

...

Why? I dunno how this guy thinks but surgery is much rarer now; most trannies don't actually think they have the opposite chromosomes. If they did I'd draw the line, but weird isn't necessarily wrong.

It's just, who fucking cares. Tumblr even denies that gender dysphoria is a thing, their gender obsession is unrelated to actual psychiatry.

I'm not happy? lol
I'm busy laughing at you faggots.

Boring as fuck.

Sure, bro. I'm sure they didn't mind you not having a dick. Or maybe they thought you were a woman. Did you tell them? Or did you hide it from them.


lol

Which is how I feel.

Yeah, I told them I was trans.

Sure you are.

Nice job continuing to make excuses, m8.

Never made this argument.

Are you sure you aren't deeply offended by this person's existence? Because you sound like you have a personal vendetta. Did a drag queen fuck your mother?


If they do not believe something objectively wrong, they are sane by definition.

Nice reading comprehension, maybe I labelled it "gender" instead of sex you would've gotten the picture.

You choose to go through with the surgery. Your interest in sex is just being covered up.

Lol, more power to you then. As long as you're upfront about it. You're still delusional, though.

I'm more troubled by the logic of it all.


I do not agree with this line of thinking. I believe people should get real help and accept who they are. This is the only way to fix the problem, not by doing shit to themselves that they can't take back.

Yeah. I'll show you all how not mad I am by replying how not mad I am. Maybe you'll get it.

lol~

lol


Well, while I believe I still have XY chromosomes I also believe I'm a woman. Others would disagree.


lol you really are retarded aren't you?

Lovely pathologizing again.


k

You must be new here. Would you like a tutorial on reaction images?
If he taught you accepting delusions makes you happier so you should do it, which was the basis of your post, then yes, I would have to say that's very unscientific.
Genders don't exist, retard. It's just a made-up word. Sex is all that counts.
This isn't about "what other people say" it's about what's scientific. About facts. Please see and if you disagree with modern science I would LOVE to see your refutations and evidence. What's wrongā€¦?
It's true. Lack of testosterone leads to a dead sex drive, if it were put back in you you would want to fuck women more. So if "pathologizing" is your way of saying "well you're wrong mr. meanie!" then I suppose you must believe science is a social construct as well, huh? Nice subjective relativism.

lol

Sex exists. It's not about what you believe. Again, let's see those refutations. Unless you don't have an argument?

Hasn't read Lacan, I guess.

feels > reals obviously
you're the one who says SRS isn't an effective treatment

lol

Explain to me your reasoning, don't tell me "well go read so-and-so" that's a cheap cop-out. If you truly understand something, then you should be able to reiterate those points instead of hiding like a coward.

So again, let's see those refutations?

If you say so.

I guess neither have you, or you'd be posting some arguments from that source. You haven't done that, probably because you know they're bullshit.

Guess what, faggot, it's not an effective treatment. You're just as delusional as before.

Also
Science is a social construct.
Science doesn't come about without cognition.

And you're still replying to a transwoman. You need refutations? Read Lacan.

And there we have it, more subjective relativist bullshit. You have no basis for your claims.
Just stop.

You should like a tumblrite saying "read foucalt"

again, if you know about Lacan, then summarize his points. Go onā€¦

And there we have it, more retardation.

Try posting an argument next time.

By that logic, you can't actually say you're a man or a woman, because you don't even know if you're correct or if your empirical devices are reliable. How do you know you're not a crab?

Stop being retarded. You're a man.

I'm not summarizing thousands of pages in a single post for retards who can't even condescend to address the original criticisms instead of hiding behind ideology.

Then I guess you're done, huh dumbass?

Nice strawman again. lol

Not as long as you keep replying, troglodyte.

...

Maybe those hormones have fucked with your head too much? :^)

Can't even grasp simple concepts or memory anymore.

That's not how it works, technically speaking. People are supposed to see a psychiatrist for their issues, whom will then recommend treatment. Sometimes HRT is part of this, sometimes it isn't.

Again, surgery is objectively very rare now because GD is recognized as a disorder, and you can only get it if you can prove to a psychiatric office that you are, beyond a reasonable doubt, capable of making such a decision. Before this anyone could get it because it was just another cosmetic surgery in legal terms.

It's like someone with OCD living alone so they can have a life as tediously organized as they please; if it makes them happy, who cares. Forcing yourself to live a less enjoyable life doesn't make you strong, it makes you stupid.

I'm not defending tranny poster either, he's being a retard regardless.

You still think science isn't socially conceived and that knowledge just exists without first being asked for.

...

Still waiting on those refutationsā€¦
If you have XY chromosomes you are a man regardless of what you believe, this is the objective reality. Are you REALLY trying so hard to change up the basis of objectivity, science, definitions, and logic JUST so you can desperately trick yourself into believing you're a woman? Really?

This is why people hate you trannies, and SJWs.

...

lol
Hello Ayn Rand.

Were your genes tested at birth in order to assign you a sex? You can keep trying to enforce unused criteria onto other people, but since they looked at your cock and not your chromosomes I think it's safe to say that by replacing mine I've been reassigned to a different sex.

You may hate me, but unlike communists I've won.

:(

Women have two x chromosomes. Men have an x and a y. It's basic biology. We also don't taste that you're human at birth that doesn't mean that you're actual an attack helicopter. At the end of the day you'll always be a man.

...

Do you really not know the definition of objectivity or are you just pretending to be retarded?

Are you talking about hermaphrodites? They are not a separate sex. If you need confirmation of your sex, then why don't you go get tested for your chromosomes? They will prove to you I am right.

Also
You can't "replace" chromosomes. You haven't really been turned into a woman.

You have only yet to be defeated.

Regarding being a transwoman that is


I never denied I didn't still have XY chromosomes. Again, lovely misrepresentation and round-abouting.

-didn't*

ā€¦

I didn't say I got my chromosomes replaced.
I said I got my dick replaced.

Again, lovely misrepresentation and round-abouting.

No it's still there. It's just been horribly mutilated.

Then be more clear next time. Again, you're still not a woman, as long as your chromosomes say you're a man.

Your "vagina" is a mutilated penis, your hormones, an external agent. You're no different than people who get tattoos of scales all over their bodies and call themselves reptiles. Sorry if the truth triggers you.

sometimes brocialist is a pretty appropriate term for Holla Forums
despite how much they think they're egalitarians
check your pĀ­rĀ­ivileĀ­ge cis cum :^)

Its kind of amusing that Jim Profit actually describes himself as a Brocialist, idk why Holla Forums doesn't like him.

Yeah we don't give a shit about that word here. We embrace the label. It's not considered an insult worth taking seriously on here.

horribly?
I think it looks pretty cute
to each their own I guess


All thinking and perception comes from a particular perspective, and that different perspectives will produce different views of truth. There are only these views of truth, or interpretations; there is no objective reality beneath them, no independent standard that they refer to. The task of the philosopher, then, is not to rid himself of perspectiveā€”this would not be possible, since to be a person is to be a particular perspective, a particular point of view, to be in only one place at onceā€”but to look at things from many different perspectives. Subjectivity is truth insofar as we are involved in how one relates oneself to matters of fact. Since how one acts is, from the ethical perspective, more important than any matter of fact, truth is to be found in subjectivity rather than objectivity.


Then this pic is also rather appropriate.

Enjoying your non-sectarian anti-idpol paradise? :)

Get out of here.

Kill yourself.

fixed your meme

Thanks. :)))

shut the fuck up shoexarmoured is my OTP, theyre cute as fuck

I already know about the is-ought problem. Tell me how this is relevant here?
I'm not interested in views, i am interested in truth.

Let me quell your subjective relativism right there: Say person A believe the sky is blue and person B believes it is black, by your line of thinking they are both correct, but their views contradict, there is an objective answer and that answer cannot be contradictory. They cannot both be right. Either the sky is blue or it isn't. If it were black it would be not-blue by default and satisfy that proposition, if that were the case.

No, people can be wrong. While people can interpret things differently, objective reality exists regardless of their interpretation or their acknowledgement.

We're talking about the matter of reality and material, not ethical do's and don't's. It doesn't matter what you feel or what you believe, what matters is facts.

Go back to your intro to philosophy course.

Kill yourself.

"The stepping out of (what we experience as) ideology is the very form of our enslavement to it."

Read Žižek.

Easy. They are both on different hemispheres. They are both right. Retard.

Anycase, goodbye. Enjoy your objectivity, Rand.

Please cease and desisit your meme philosopher as well as your "read ____" meme.


Alright, retard; they're both standing a fot away from eachother looking into the exact same sky at the exact same time.

Don't forget to pick up your strawman on the way out!

*a foot away

"Then be more clear next time."

Also literally not a misinterpretation. Maybe you misinterpreted what you wrote as objective truth.

You know what I meant, stop with your ass-pulling.

So, about that refutation to the sky argumentā€¦?

...

After you.

You're like a broken record with no new insights.


"Don't forget to pick up your [ad hominem] on the way out!"

That's what i expected. Come back with some facts next time, or don;t come back at all.

It was a literal strawman, I am not a randroid. Does this look like a yellow-and-black flag to you?

...

...

Fact: I am a woman.

Your appeal to objectivity is Randist, silly.

No dumb niggers like you have been swarming this place for months. I warned them about all the shilling on idpol ridden shitholes.

Fact: You're a man until the day you die.

I've only been on imageboards.

I'm so T R I G G E R E D by le T R U T H
XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
HAHA
You got me guys. I'm so delusional.

Also, at least I'm not as dumb as a materialist.

In your skewed (wrong_ opinion not based in reality.
You know exactly what you're doing. Stop it.
Still not a refutation. Subjective relativism is retarded, the follower imitates the philosophy. How quaint.

You can jump up and down screaming all you want to every passer-by, but you're claim will never be accepted by objectivity, not the scientific community.

*nor the scientific community

Continental philosophy was a mistake, it's nothing but trash.

Then how come I have this certificate signed by my doctor saying official womz? XDDDDD

Sure, stay illiterate.

...

Sure, stay delusional.

lol

Objectivists in a nutshell.

You poor man.

I didn't say that, so nice strawman (yet again) come back when you're got some peer-reviewed scientific journals that redefined chromosomes into "what i feel like".

Nice strawman yet again. You keep saying I've said I've lost my chromosome.
Though, apparently you're missing one.

You expect me to believe that someone who considers brocalist an insult is from an image board.Yeah fucking right.

Once again not an insult.

Are you retarded? I never said that. You're just shitposting, you offer no refutations and keep going back to MUH FEELZ as an argument.
Though, apparently you've added one. :^)

It doesn't matter what you believe "objective reality exists regardless of their interpretation or their acknowledgement."
Also, was using it ironically. Get over yourself.


lol

That was because you made an error in a sentence and needed to correct yourself. I haven't made any further claims of that since then.

There's no hope for you

Nice strawman.

Explain to me how it's a strawman

Never said fuck facts.
But how facts come about and how they're used belongs to the subjective realm. "Reason is, and ought only to be the slave of the passions." If the will did not determine a person's actions, we would have no way to trace those actions to their springs in character, which is the prerequisite for forming moral "facts."

No you weren't. You were using the word like any idpoler would.

Yep. Glad to know you can figure out my intentions telepathically.

But you're implying it by mocking facts.

How they come about by us discovering them is not the end goal, it is what is true that matters. A fact will still be a fact regardless of who perceives it. Again, subjective relativism fails because it allows for contradictions which in themselves cannot be true.

And this has nothing to do with morals. You have XY chromosomes therefore you are a man. You can read all the fringe and edgy philosophy books from times before to try and justify yourself, but you're still wrong. Science will still be there, you can either accept reality or fuck off.

meant to quote this in

Science isn't Truth it isn't facts, and it isn't certainty. In that sense, most scientists will concede that, although they seek Truth, they don't know or generate Truth. They propose and test theories, knowing that future evidence may cause refinement, revision, or even rejection of today's theories. You're not hearing waffling or indecision. You're hearing a reasoned recognition that we can't know many things with absolute certaintyā€”we only know the observable evidence. However, we can reach the best possible conclusion based on the most complete and modern evidence available.

Anycase, science is on my side. Don't you remember the certificate I had by a qualified doctor, which you are not? There's surgeries, which were only possible through science, there's therapies, which were only possible through science, there's psychoanalysis, which was only possible through dialectics.

WOW! You're delusional. A misolgue in every sense of the word. You trannies really are insane.
Let me know when XY chromosomes spontaneously change into XX ones then.
So let me get this straight, you're saying you wish to support your view of being a woman by science but at the same time "science is a social construct" and "science doesn't matter we all experience the world differently" make up your fucking mind.
appeal to authority, your doctor is wrong. Your chromosomes remain unchanged, hence you are still a man.
Almost all trash. Fuck Freud.

quoting this in

lol

...

Nice strawman.

By science I mean the objective reality. Are our terms too different?

...

see

...

...

Nice strawman. Nowhere does it say that.

...

Except that shit doesn't make them happy. It avoids them encountering the real world. OCD isn't healthy and shouldn't be coddled.


Facing reality makes you strong. The real problem with trannies, of course, is that they expect everyone else to play along with their delusion.

...

...

"he doesn't know about conflating terms"

...

...

HAHAHAHAHAHA

This is what mentally ill trannies actually believe. No, you idiot. You didn't change your sex, just like painting my skin black wouldn't make me black. You're just a mutilated with scar tissue where your cock and balls used to be.

...

see

Do you even read?

"result" means nothing. Its about what it IS, not where it came from. Again they are not the same thing. Thats like saying a tank is a car because they're both automobiles.

...

This. Trannies are mentally ill and will be given intense psychiatric care after the revolution.

...

...

There you go conflating terms again.
psychoanalysis being an aspect of psychotherapy doesn;t make all psychotherapy psychoanalysis. Do you think all canines are dogs, too?

ITT: mentally ill trannies quasi-intellectually misunderstanding reality and desperately clinging to outdated theories of bullshit to undermine their perception so they can believe they're real women

"What we perceive as ideology are the very form of our enslavement to it."

...

...

...

So how those XY chromosomes, have they changed into X yet? No? That's too bad, man.

Also learn to quote you faggot

...

...

...

The only way to change from one gender to another is to change your chromosomes. You haven't done this, so you're not a woman.

Continue your shitposting, you're still a man. Does reality trigger you? Apparently so.

If you're so confident you're a woman, go to your local hospital and ask for your chromosomes to be tested. But you won't, because we both know this is all an act. You're really a man and you know it. You can deny it all you want, but you can't escape the fact you're hiding at the back of your mind; you are and always will be, a man.

...

...

...

...

...

Your doctor can't make you a woman. That's an objective fact. No matte what he says, you aren't a woman. And your doctor can be wrong, which is why we get a second opinion.

Tell me, if we found your skeleton one hundred years from now, would we know you were a man? We would. It's written in your very skeleton. No matter what you're doctor says, you're just a man with a cut off penis. You don't have a vagina, or a uterus, and you'll never produce a single female sex cell. You're delusional.

t. Anonymous without a Doctorate

The irony, it's hilarious.

This is objectively the truth.


It's enabling the mentally ill. It's not healthy.


It is.

this thread is epic

It's not an opinion. It's an objective fact, since you've admitted as much.


Degrees don't matter. Facts do, and the fact is that you're a man that cut his cock and balls off and is desperately trying to pretend he's a woman.

lol

...

...

nah

They do.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_differentiation_in_humans

lol

...

You don't have a vagina, you mentally ill faggot. You have scar tissue and a mutilated penis. You have no female sexual organs, nor do you have a uterus, or ovaries, or even the correct pelvis to make you a woman. You are a poor imitation of a woman.

Pic related: You don't have this, never will and you will always be a man.

...

It is nice that Holla Forums is becoming less subtle about just being an outpost of Holla Forums with a coat of red paint.

>he doesn't know the only noteworthy effect sex chromosomes have on the human body is their role in the development of primary sex characteristics

...

There are no carefully circumscribed definitions. It literally boils down to your chromosomes.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XY_sex-determination_system

Dumbass.

...

Shit like this politicops.com/pat-robertson-orlando-shooting-gods-punishment-scotus-sex-marriage-ruling/

Being anti idpol is cool and all, but full commumism is about doing whatever the fuck you want, so why do we care if people want to get HRT or gender reassignment surgery? How does that impact you?

Yeah, you mean like your cock and balls? Dipshit.


I know a buddy that got gyno from doing steroids. He's totally a girl now, right? lol

Then what about intersex people who have different patterns of chromsomes?
who.int/genomics/gender/en/index1.html

And thats only a definition the right tentatively adopted, they are still seemed obsessed with "you can't cut your dick off and call yourself a MAN"

woman*

They're an outlier and do not change the definition of male or female, just like a person born with no legs doesn't make humans into anything other than a bipedal species of apes.

Yes, I do mean my cock and balls. The former is now safely tucked inside and the latter is Christmas decorations.

...

Yeah, and it's still a cock, not a vagina. You never got one of those and never will.

Pic related

What is he even talking about?

Doesn't matter, faggot. You were born male and always will be male, no matter what happened during puberty. Puberty won't make you the opposite sex.

Enjoy being delusional. Oh, and:

Lol

A doctor disagrees.
But stay mad you didn't go to medical school and didn't make coochloads of money.


Not what I said.
Doubtfully what that post says. Nice misconstrual. If you're as reductive to chromosomes as you are, you might as well be a race realist whose taxonomic distinctions are no better.

lol

So I guess they are just mutants? If even the most reductionist perspective of a biological take on gender doesn't hold up, whats the point of even using it?
The definition seems to change depending on who you are talking to. Some people focus solely on chromosomes but most of the right focus on your genitals
But why stick to any of these definitions? How is it useful in defining and discussing men and women in our perceivable reality? And what about the biological evidence that trans people may have different brain structures to a "cis" person?


John Hopkins please go

Then he must disagree with science, since sex is determined by chromosomes. The main definition in science for a male is that they produce the smaller sex cells. You once did this, but you will never produce the large ones. You are male.


I am going to school, but I'm not going there with the purpose of making money. I see that all you are interested is in idpol and not class liberation. For the record, I'm actually studying medicine, so someday you may meet me and a doctor will tell you that you're a delusional tranny.

That's the only thing you could mean. Whatever happens with secondary sex characteristics doesn't mean shit. That's not how we define male and female.


Except this is how we define male and female in humans and other species. There is no way around it. "Race realists" don't understand taxonomy and couldn't fucking tell you shit about crap because all their definitions are made up to suit them. You are arguing against established science.

No wonder people hate Analytical philosophy when cheezburgers can't deal with people messing with MUH DEFINITIONS

You're judging that from one conversation. And you're more idpol than I ever was since I'm the one arguing that """"identity"""" doesn't matter.

Likewise.

Thats pretty much never been the definition. First it was by your own cultural understanding of men and women, then your gentiles, then how you were born, and now chromosomes. Only idiots care about the biological definition using something as tentative as muh chromosomes.

That's precisely it. It's a disorder that often results in more than just an odd chromosome pairing. As I said, a man being born without limbs doesn't change the fact that humans are defined as having four.


Except it does hold up and you know it. You're trying to use people with illnesses as an excuse to not admit to what you are: a male. You don't suffer from any of these disorders. You fit nicely into the definition, and that just chaps your ass.


Only if you're talking to a mentally ill faggot.


Because your genitals are formed as a consequence of you having those chromosomes. However, you had a cock and balls, but you've never had and never will have a vagina.


Because we must agree to definitions in order to draw conclusions from them.


If I decided that x treatment seems to work better on women, would you assign this treatment to a tranny, or would you assign a treatment that works best on males?


A schizophrenic person also has a different brain structure to a "sane" person. That doesn't mean we stop treating them.

It's enough to tell.


It mattered enough for you to cut your dick off. I would rather you have been treated and not allowed to harm yourself. In socialism, no doctor will mutilate a person because of their delusions.

Get off your high horse, faggot.

You'd think that the "male chromosome"ā€”the Y-Chromosomeā€”would have all the recipes needed to make a man: testosterone genes, penis genes, testicle genes, prostate genes, thick hair genes, and so on. But it's not. Recipes for making the components of testosterone are on Chromosomes 2, 5, 6, 8, 11, 15, 19ā€¦ And penis-making recipes are on Chromosomes 2, 5, Xā€¦

It is in humans.


Yes, science learns more as time goes on. Are you going to complain about germ theory next? Gonna tell me how the bad humours and "excess of blood" is what causes illness?


Gee, I wonder why, dumbass.

I'm sorry that a medical professional allowed himself to do that to you. I promise you that I will fight for that to never happen again.

Sounds very idpol that you're fighting to deny someone treatment because they have a chromosome.

Mutilation is not treatment. It's malpractice at the very least and should be a crime.

After surgery, the tissue that was previously the penis literally develops into actual, differentiated vaginal tissue.
gendercare.com/library/italiano_paper1.html

It is.


Nope, it's colon tissue, and you already know this.

You do not have a vagina, and never will. You will never have a uterus, nor will you have ovaries, nor will you produce eggs. You will never be a woman, and a crime was done to you.

Absolutely disgusting.

Yeah, okay medicine man.

Just wait until we can 3D print transplants and culture whole uteruses :^)

Okay, then even worse, because now you can't even claim:


Because that's the only way you're going to get a "vagina" that doesn't need as much lubrication. Nice job trying to mislead people again about the barbarism that is SRS.

That's not how 3d printers work and you'll never birth a child either. Your very skeleton is wrong.

...

There was a time when SRS wasn't even possible. How unscientific of you.

There was also a time when man didn't have planes, or pasteurization, or vaccines, or computersā€¦

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17992150

Oops, looks like you're full of shit again.

And that time will come a gain, because it's barbarism masquerading as medicine.

I'm sorry, where do you get that impression from? The whole post is about a guy raging at the Assigned Male comics. Neither side of this debate mentioned anything to do with class or economics. So based on that information, why would trans user only care about idpol?

That sentence sums it up nicely. Since when do leftists think that money is what determines truth? I thought socialism was a science, and that we care about facts.

So its about medical and scientific practice? That's fine, but why would that compel you to treat these people as their "assigned gender" in the social sphere? Or psychologically? Its a very cold perceptive of humans that doesn't have any benefit outside of the limited space of a surgery room. That's not to down play the importance of medical research, medical practice and so on, but why does that compel you to say "your a man" and not "you are a result of this specific combination of genes"?

There's literally nothing wrong with being transgender, but there's plenty wrong about Assigned Male.

Nothing wrong with making fun of terrible webcomics, though it's a waste of time in the grand scheme of things.

You want peer review? Fine. Here's something from a year later.

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07520.x/full


Oops, looks like you're a bitch.

If you don't think social science is a real science then why would you think Marxian economics is a real science?

As a side note, you or perhaps someone else mentioned pol's perspective on race. Notice how they take what ultimately amounts to a tiny difference between human beings and blow it up to apply to ALL spheres of human existence including the social, political, psychological etc. How is that different from what you are doing by overally emphasising the information that chrsomosmes tell us?

It's about more than that. We must first define what we are talking about in order to talk about it. Otherwise we get nowhere. This is important in science and other aspects of life.


Gender is defined by sex, which is assigned by nature. I will treat people equally, though, so it shouldn't matter. I certainly won't sleep with a tranny, though. I'm not into men.


It has use for a lot of things. I certainly wouldn't want women as infantrymen, but a tranny might do if he's not off his rocker.


Because he is a man. Accepting reality is what will help us move forward. Dwelling in delusion is poison.


Because one is easier and also correct.

So now its not about if you can get a vagina but rather how effective that vagina is? How does that gives a useful definition about gender?

Yep, let's accept capital then because there's no alternative to surplus and currency yet!!!!

Then I reiterate my original question: Why is this definition of gender useful and important outside of the operating room?

And you think we give a fuck about this incredibly obnoxious tripfaggot why?

Oops, looks like you're still a mentally ill tranny. Sorry bruv, but you'll never have a vagina.

Ok
Makes sense, you wouldn't be comfortable doing so
Wait what? Lol

...

Because it's politically incorrect to say transwomen aren't real women. They must be the last bastion of science!!!one!!!1!


And nonetheless:
Nice goalposting.

In the very limited circumstances of the operating room. Are you autistic by any chance?

Simple. I wouldn't want some poor sod to sleep with you thinking you're a woman. That and other things that have to do with social dynamics between the sexes.

I told everyone I was intimate with pre and post op I was trans.
Fuck off, faggot.

Well it is in the name "infantryMAN".

No, but I think at least for the current form of war, the infantry is simply too tough for women, along with most men. Allowing women into the infantry would necessitate the lowering of standards, which should obviously not be done.

However, I think women should be encouraged to join in places that are more mechanized, since where brain power counts, they are much more even. Helicopter pilots, intelligence, civil affairs (which I should add is pretty badass in its own ways). All these thing women should do, but their bones are simply not built for it. Neither are men's, but they seem to last longer without injury.

But I'm not trans.
Also if it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and you aren't aware its a scientifically altered goose, then is it a duck for all intents and purposes?

Damn, people.fuck.body pillows but you won't fuck someone with Y chrosome? That's a stupid reason.

It's also objectively true.


So now you've put bladder tissue there. Nice, but it still isn't a vagina, no matter how much you want it to be. You also have to remember that this was done on women that had underdeveloped vaginas, not a lack of one completely, or a penis. The test done on transgenders showed that nothing changed. You're the one moving the goalposts, not me.

Lolno

It's important everywhere. No matter what you think. You're mentally ill and enabling you is only going to harm you.

Assuming you were. Humor me for a second.


No, and if you did this to anyone, male or female, you should be in prison. One would almost be justified in beating the life out of you, if not worse.


I think people won't fuck a mutilated man with colon tissue as part of his "vagina".

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2303.2009.00663.x/abstract?systemMessage=Wiley Online Library will be unavailable on Saturday 30th July 2016 from 08:00-11:00 BST / 03:00-06:00 EST / 15:00-18:00 SGT for essential maintenance.Apologies for the inconvenience.&userIsAuthenticated=false&deniedAccessCustomisedMessage=

Also, even if it's not a cis vagina, then it's at least a neovagina as every source concerning transgender surgery would refer to it as such.

But I guess they too have an """agenda""" to promote and a delusion to feed.

You clearly don't know how to read. This just found that they had dicks coming into their fucking mutilated insides. Are you really this stupid, that you think dicks inside a hole make it a fucking vagina? The point is that cells have a similar environment, not that it's now a vagina.

How dumb can you get?

Still refers to it as a neovagina.

Whew, this thread brought in all the edgy Holla Forumstards, huh.

You can tell people you have a neovagina. We know that means you're a mutilated men, though.


Because it's not a vagina, stupid. It's an imitation of one.

If it feels and looks like one then who gives a shit lol

neo - new
vagina - sheathe found in women's external genetalia

New vagina.

Everyone that doesn't want to enable the mentally ill.

Oh, you're one of those posters.
Should've figured from reading this thread anyway

I bet you think giving MAO inhibitors to treat for depression means you're enabling the mentally ill too.

en.wiktionary.org/wiki/neovagina


Lol

It's not a vagina, m8. A vagina is a reproductive organ, something trannies don't have.

You should have said earlier that you were idpol, man. Saves us all time.

Those treat the depression. Mutilation does not treat the delusion that mutilation is necessary. Great job at not understanding what the actual problem is.

lol
We just had this argument with the an-com.

...

Good point. Transexuals don't have ovaries or uterus either.

you shouldnt even bother anymore, the idpol is too strong in them

if they arent gonna read the thread before posting the same shit then dont respond

You're right. Gonna close the tab and do other things.

Yeah, that's one way to go about it.

OK, so I read that paper and it's poor science. The authors arrogantly claim that their intent was to "end this discussion." They did not come close. Their paper is at best a few questionable data points.

There is no information about the surgical technique the subjects received or the surgeon who did the job. There is no information about the subjects other than their age, time since vaginoplasty, and time on hormones.

Two of the biopsies were taken during the original vaginoplasty. So you know that sample size of 9? No, it was actually 7.

Two of those seven were reported as having "a reddish wet appearance associated with eczematous dermatitis or, even, mucosa." But those subjects did not have high glycogen in their biopsy so the authors ruled them out. So according to the authors they are mucosal but not mucosal.

Were there any controls for their collection and preparation techniques? There is a slide of a "normal female vagina" but no information about where that slide came from. Did they get it out of a box somewhere or did they use their same technique to collect it? Who knows?

Those two patients with the "mucosa" were the youngest to receive vaginoplasty, at age 22 and 23. The other 5 who were reported to have drier lining got vaginoplasty at a mean age of 39, with the biopsy taken at mean age of 44.

Maybe if a person gets a vaginoplasty at age 39 with some unspecified technique, then their juices might not be flowing at age 44. Since there is no age control, I don't know how many cis women around age 44 would be considered "dry" by the standards of the authors. How did they rate the subjects as either dry or wet anyway?

A total lack of controls is not going to end this discussion. The authors should be ashamed of themselves for making that claim and the editors should be fired for allowing it to be published.

So you are autistic

But the current form of war is highly mechanized. it doesn't take much for a woman to shoot a gun, drive a tank

granted, can you even demonstrate women are incapable of the rigors of infantry combat? it primarily involves running, jumping and shooting. Wouldn't you just just need good cardio, physical endurance and a good aim to become a good solider?

What about trans men? after undergoing HRT they are for all intents and purposes physically male outside of the chromosomes. Can you demonstrate That the changes that don't occur (say, to bone structure) are sufficient to disqualify for running, jumping and shooting?

In theory, a cis women with out a uterus would also have to dilate. This does not include (usually) women who have had there uterus removed later in life due to the nature of those surgeries and that the vaginal canal has already had a chance to form and retain it's shape; however, women who are born without a uterus may/will suffer from vaginal agenesis where the vaginal canal can fail to form or be atrophied both conditions may need dilation.

Well yeah, basically. As transitioning tends to reduce suicide rates I would say its a decent trade off.

Granted this is based on the false premise that extreme body modification is a bad thing, which it isn't unless its down without consent.

Not him, but the USMC tested it many times in the 90s and did so again recently. They ended up lowering standards. Women aren't capable of it in their current form. Most of infantry combat involves carrying heavy loads over long periods. Women have smaller lungs too, so they don't run as much, and seem to bleed out faster. It's just not a good thing for them, not until we get some kind of exoskeleton going.

Interesting, thanks for the info

Exoskeletons won't help because men still have a higher rate of stamina, deal with combat stress better, shoot more accurately and if their exoskeleton breaks in the field they need to get out and fix it, which men will do better due to being physically superior to women.

Women are not designed for combat, women are simply inferior to men in almost every way due to difference in evolutionary paths. When all you have to do to breed is spread your legs, you have less evolutionary challenges to adapt to than if you have to get someone else to spread them for you.

Women do have a few advantages but they're mostly minor things such as a slightly better memory. But even if we ignore all this you still have to deal with the social dynamics a woman brings to the table. Putting 1 woman in front of 20 men is going to cause a shit storm, you go from a unit of 20 brothers in arms to a unit of 19 rivals for chance to get laid. Any one who has spent any time in an all male social group and then seen a woman join it knows the massive difference it makes and it's enough to get people killed in war time.

Plus a lot of women end up pregnant during training or before they ship out. Either intentionally or not, this causes unit disruptions (You trained with 20 people and now you're sending 19 of them plus another guy to the front) and a complete waste of time and money on a soldier who won't return your investment because they got knocked up instead.

Women in combat is a way for a society to commit suicide. It gets good men killed and hands our enemies baby incubators to produce more of them. Fuck that. We're a tournament species, that means men and women are not equal and unless you have a couple of million years to selective breed women to change their mating strategy you're not going to fix that.

Social Justice warriors, (Or intersectional feminists.) are the cancer that killed the left, so they are a pretty big problem.

Holla Forums everyone!

She may be an insufferable cunt, but I wouldn't busting a nut on her face.