Be Inna Commiefornia

I never know what to vote for. It feels like there is always some hidden agenda or consequence on both sides of the argument. For example:

Is this a good thing? On one side I would think that less prisoners means less of the budget going to prisons which means more money for other things. However, if non violent means things like releasing drug dealers, does that mean I have a higher chance of being stabbed by a crack head because said drug dealer went back to slinging? I'm confused as to what to do.

Also

Other urls found in this thread:

vig.cdn.sos.ca.gov/2016/general/en/pdf/complete-vig.pdf
twitter.com/arzE/status/793514606937317377
ballotpedia.org/California_2016_ballot_propositions
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

If anything, vote against killary because she's a woman

Women can't do anything right.

no 63 no 64

For me, its less the substance of the propsition than it is the sponsors that decide it for me most of the time. (((They))) make the props deliberately confusing so that the uninformed voter (basically everybody) will just shrug and not bother to vote, while in the meantime the (((special interests))) round up their unions and employees, give them a list of what to vote for, and send them to the polls. Its bullshit.

On the ones I don't understand fully I put them into a search engine, and look at the ballotpedia information. If it has heavy democrat support, don't vote for it, it's probably shit.

don't repeal the death penalty
do expedite the death penalty
don't release niggers from prison

I would say those are the most important ones.

The proposition system is ruining California, it's nightmare of Greek direct democracy. Almost every proposition you see is a Jew trying to fuck you by fooling the idiots
If you don't know for sure it is good, vote no.
51=no
52=no
53=no
54=yes because fuck them
55=no
56=no
57=no
58=no
59=no
60=no
61=no
62=yes because innocent whites are being put into the meat grinder, saving one white is worth feeding 100 niggers
63=no
64=no
65=no
66=no
67=no

I voted no on all propositions.

Why no on 64?

Make sure you read it. polls are open all day.
Info guide:
vig.cdn.sos.ca.gov/2016/general/en/pdf/complete-vig.pdf

What about things like school district employees? I never looked into them because I honestly just neglected to.

Voting no on everything doesn't really work since some of the props are stated as a negative. One might say vote yes to not have weed legalized. That's how fucked the propositions are.

Its a trap. Rapists are considered nonviolent criminals under this prop.

Marijuana is degenerate, this is a Nat Soc board not a libtard board.

Obviously you have to read each proposition and the legal language in the book they give you, the false no has only appeared a few times on ballots in the past.

Whenever trying to dig around for truth in bullshit, remove all adjective.
For example:
i.e. gun control
i.e. citizenship

Prisoners = nigs and spics. Don't release them, dumbass.

Under prop 64 sure weed won't be legal on a federal level but it will be decriminalized. Under 64, anyone is allowed at anytime (21 or over) to have 28.5g on them of flower and 8g concentrate however in your home there is no limit to how much you can store. So if you grow the max of 6 plants you can keep your entire harvest. Growing outdoors will be fine as long as direct line of sight to the public is broken.

I quit smoking because of the stupid hipster culture that comes with it in cali and the assholes making a killing selling overpriced stuff. To be honest the people mostly against it are all the people who run micro grows and dispensaries. They dont want marlboro or monsanto coming in and walmarting the business. Why shouldn't they be allowed to if I'm allowed to grow at home? I only smoke once or twice a month anyway so 6 plants harvest would last longer than the weed would at the rate I smoke.

I think it sends yet another message to the feds about the failure of the war on drugs. I know it sounds very left (because it is) but I think if we legalized it and stopped fucking glamorizing it like its a rite of passage (along with booze and cigs) kids wouldn't subconsciously feel the need to use it.

So you would waste your resources to fight a never-ending war instead of legalizing and containing it? Think about the bigger picture.

In the end though well see if your way is the right way depending on how things go in the philipines. All I'm saying is i think it would seriously reduce crime if drugs were legalized, taxed and quality tested.

MA fag here , just voted no to the herb

How can you believe in freedom AND banning something like a plant that god created? You would see someone punished for using gods bounty?

Commiefornian here. Just returned from paper ballots. I couldn't read the jargon and mostly went voting based on what seemed to leave decisions to individuals when it came to props. 60 was my favorite. Didn't vote on most props since I suspected some were trying to make bad things sound good and vice versa, but I did say no on stricter background checks on guns.

Nice black or white fallacy, but based Duterte has shown us that drugs CAN be effectively fought if you just kill the drug dealers and threaten to do the same to the addicts if they don't go to rehab.

its worth it tbh the arrogance protruding from this (((guy)) from a band i used to like is too much

twitter.com/arzE/status/793514606937317377

Of fuck off kike. Weed helps me sleep, helps me train (i smoke after working out) has saved my wife from her menstrual cycle, has gotten me and my friends out of the jew-run pharmacuticals, and will save the fucking world from the pain killers (poison) being pushed on our communities.

Fuck, even as food you prick. The seeds are fucking complete with their amino acids (workout snacks) and the greens are amazing cattle fodder, and can have the cannabanoids extracted for medical use, prior to making animal feed. Then the damned fiber can replace half the overpriced synthetic zog materials we're constantly sold on.

So fuck you piece of shit, waste of skin. Weed is our ally, and has been since the days the allfather walked the earth.

Even theocratic sandniggers knew this better.

Also, should we stop "wasting resources" on medicines because death is inevitable?

Even though I don't agree with the drug war I'm still voting trump as soon as I put on my shorts and walk across the street with my ballot.
Yes 64
Yes Trump

Here in my county (alameda) there is also a measure A1
This one I'm having trouble with. If you live in the bay area you know affordable housing is everywhere. I myself was homeless for years until working my way out. I always despised places like lark inn (shelter in SF). Im all for helping out veterans and the disabled but low income isn't an excuse and tbh most people are homeless for a reason and if they are given free housing they will stagnate forever on taxpayers dime.

Side note:
smh

Hes shooting meth dealers dumbass. You ask most stoners, deadheads, and street kids if this is good or bad, and they will shout "Fuck yeah, let's do that here! Can I have a gun? I'll fucking do it right now!"

Meth turns humans into goblins. Even the good guys kill goblins on sight. Even the bad guys hate goblins too!

Fuck goblins.

56 is a $2/pack tax on cigarettes that goes mostly to "early childhood development programs." A quarter goes to get people to stop smoking. Only 10% goes to the general coffers.
57 allows people with multiple convictions to get a parole hearing as soon as the punishment period for their primary offense is up. It also further rewards prisoners with good boy points and lets the judge decide if they get juvi or adult jail.

I'll let you make the judgment.

You dumb son of a bitch. Hemp is literally the greatest textile on the planet. Keeping marijuana illegal keeps hemp industries from flourishing. Good job not actually understand the full ramifications of the proposition, you fucking mong.

If thats a reason then you better tear down silicon valley and stop building in the bay area and LA

Surrender or die, user.

hehe baby needs his pacifier hehe

Take kratom as an example of how far the pharm industry will go to ensure you can't escape. The main alkaloids in Kratom were patented before the DEA announced emergency scheduling. Don't you see? Pharma doesn't want the average peasant to be able to treat his own ailments. They want you hooked on drugs that will inevitably lead you deeper and deeper into the "healthcare system".

Wake up and stop eating lies

dead I am, faggot.

Vote no on all of them, fuck California

Dude, weed, lol

You can do all of those withouth drugs.
1. Meditation
2. Really? you're that weak mentally?
4. Eat and drink healthy and exercise
5. Why were you on them in the first place? You just replaced one drug with another.

Sure the road is harder but in the end your lungs are healthy, the wallet full and your body clear.
I smoke, but only while playing an instrument once in a while when I try to experiment with styles.

A buddy stopped smoking weed and started having seizures. He never had them before.

Do you know why I pulled you over? You've got a busted tail light, a 'maple leaf' Bernie sticker, and your dreadlocks smell like hooch mixed with dog shit.

Vote yes on anything that takes power and money away from Sacramento, and no on anything that gives them more. Make sure to vote NO on 58 if you want to continue to force the spics to speak English in classrooms.

need a MA ballot questions thread

did you vote for Loretta Sanchez (democrat) or Kamala Harris (democrat) ? god i hate this fucking state.

Much as I hate to say I voted for a spic, Harris is a San Francisco politician aka Feinstein 2.0. Sanchez could not possibly be worse.

like the kind that do only non-violent crimes? like for example (just an example) deleting 33000 or so classified emails?

Im voting yes on 64 but tbh you need to get your shit together. Why bandage an open wound without stitching it closed first? You use weed to medicate like a psyche med. You need to find the problem in your mind that causes whatever issues you have and deal with them. Hell, have you ever thought that the weed is what gives you the negative symptoms and you need more to cure them? (withdrawal) Could you be mistaking withdrawal symptoms for symptoms caused by your own self?

Have you not seen the prison population boom in the Philippines? In America do you really think jailing and killing tens of thousands over weed is the way to go?

That is codeword for "release shitskins who din du nuffin!"
Kill yourself OP.

AMENDMENT 1 FL
YAY OR NAY?

I mean I think everyone here smokes once in a while, but have some self control you fucking degenerate.

why did you vote no on 60? you want to make more money for the joo?

I put nay because I don't want the hordes of blacks coming out of prisons to bolster the Black Panthers.

You make all of these assumptions because I smoke weed?

US Navy Veteran (Military ruined my health, had multiple surgeries before I turned 23 as a result. )Weed and e perimental russian nootropics, meditation, and physical training have me in better fighting condition than when I was enlisted again. I can out perform the standards for when I was 18 and now I'm over 30.

I work for myself, have a car, a rifle, and a beautiful redpilled wife who spots the jew, and am happy, and grow my own weed and set my own hours.

In my free time, I prepare for the day of the rope, shitpost kek memes, campaign for trump, and train in western martial arts.

My family just voted for trump.

And I motherfucking taught hippies to hate, and got the streetkids and hooligans of the pacific northwest to campaign for fucking trump!

The fuck have you done, other than try to create divide? I also memed trump and pepe blotter acid into existence, take that! Smoke more, RWN

so lets say we make certain drugs Dutarte like crack and meth and all the other shit. legalize and then tax and regulate the herbal jew to keep the undermench passified, get "muh seizure oil" , and continue testing on hallucinogens for medical or military use

seems like it'd help quell some bullshit (like the 40% of the population in the nation that needs to be eradicated, and maybe pacify some of the 60% that are weak and inferior. )

but this is speculation

>reddit spacing
reported.

no better than someone drinking nyquil
lol bullshit any excuse to smoke up

thanks OP for fucking up your body and more importantly your "wife's" body as well. Your child is going to enjoy the congenital autism you gave it.

this is my favorite type of stoner faggot
also
you see. cuckchan cancer needs to leave. they are only on the trump train for bantz and memes. they do not want to MAGA

Sorry, m8, but your slow-brain drug is degenerate; and the sign of weakness. Even hallucinogens are degenerate, but this is less obvious.

All drugs are degenerate, weed should only be used by the severely mentally ill

If you want to argue psycedelics and drugs more, create a new thread, I will join and sperg out more there. I am probably falling for shill bait and helping to derail an important thread.

Electing trump comes first, rwds second, bitching about choices of plants third.

...

What? It's its a solar energy thing.

I don't think taking a hallucinogen is degenerate if you have respect for what you are doing and not just doing it to get "high". When I use salvia (the only hallucinogen i use), i use the plain leaf (since i grow it) and smoke it. Im not claiming I get enlightened, what I get is the opportunity to experience perception in new ways. I am able to experience states of the mind I would have never known to be possible. It has helped me to recognize illusion in the world as well.

I maybe use it once a year

Will an absentee vote in Commiefornia do any good? Or is it subject to destruction or fraud?

...

You take it just for the sake of getting fucked up, you take it to explore your mind. Why is that so bad? Tell me why its so god damned degenerate to spend a bit of time experimenting with your conscious mind?

...

YES on 60 in cali

being straight edge is degenerate
you're not the god emperor
you are a man, with sin and vice.
stop pretending to be a god.

No on 58 and vote Sanchez over Harris. Both are cunts but we can't have someone worse than Harris taking her spot.

Anything to mess with that (((industry)))

There is nothing wrong with a man who chooses not to indulge in substances. Just like there is nothing wrong with someone partaking. Any man should be free to do what he will as long as it doesn't impede upon the free will of another.

No on 63

ayyy

The main reason I voted no was because we would be spending money enforcing a law that doesn't change much, and at the end of the day doesn't affect me at all. If it really hurt them that much they would just operate in a different state.

They are already fairly strict on stopping diseases from going around.

Is this fucking reddit? This is textbook liberalism muh individual sovereignty; "There is no true way, there is no 'right', so let men do as they please." Get the fuck off of Holla Forums you retards. The 'Individual' is nothing but a egoistic pile of flesh and bone; if you fail to conform to higher orders of being you may as well be livestock.

user if it take up to 2 months to spot hiv then imagine this scenario.
Porn star has unprotected sex with a girl because she tested safe. Now imagine that girl had had sex with a man other than the porn star because that guy was tested safe. Imagine if at some point in all this fucking someone caught hiv. Now imagine this person gets tested a month after catching hiv and comes back negative. Now imagine that guy with hiv fucking the girl the porn star was fucking. The girl would have hiv and test clean then give it to the porn star who would then give it to the next person he did a raw scene with.

Make them wear condoms. That "industry" is a hub for disease.

Your way or the highway? Just because i believe in every man being his own doesn't mean I don't recognize the need for a social structure and pecking order. But honestly if someone uses drugs on their own time its no consequence for you. If all drugs were legalized however I would agree that voters should be tax payers

this

Not only that but your example is shit.
DOTR for weedfags

if were were trying to justify mainlining smack then yeah you'd have a point. if we were sucking cock for meth, you'd have a point.

but you're literally just being a faggot becuase you dont smoke weed.
remove all the niggers and spics, gas the kikes, and glass the middle east, then after a few years of only white smoking, you can bitch about it and try to impose some kind of moral ban.

but dont sit here and tell me i'm wrong because i enjoy hitting a bong.

Reported.

I don't care what you did. The only thing I know is that you're a weak minded degenerate with an inflated ego that can't even control himself let alone change the outer world.

cruise control
report me all you want, as a functioning member of society who occasional has a marijuana i can safely say that reporting me will not ease the pain in your ass

perhaps you might try some herbs for that discomfort?

...

This was for

Just noticed

Are you fucking stupid? People Get hiv left and right here in the bay area and don't even know it. People get tested together to fuck raw but don't take into account the persons other partners. Jesus christ user, they need to wear condoms

You're gonna be the one who winds up swinging. Don't try to dictate what I can do with force. Im a tax payer and ill use a plant if i damn well please

Who said jailing? Lurk moar faggot.

why not just kill anyone who gets aids?
we're talking about going dutarte on weedfags, might as well kill off all the pozzed while we're at it.

lmao

Nyquil is proven to melt your brain cells.

Read my post in full faggot

...

Maybe containment. Imagine a walled off city block for people with hiv and aids. They could still work and live and produce goods. (no food stuff or medicine)

No, faggot, you just straight up kill them all without jailing them. I know you're a low T beta cuck that gets shivers at the mere tought of violence, but if it worked in a high-energy 3rd world shithole it will sure as hell work here where cucks like you whose idea of a fight is talking passive aggressively to each other on the internet are the norm.

Drugs are degenerate. Kill all drug dealers, problem solved.

You fucking dummy. If you want to smoke weed like a faggot, fine; I really don't give a shit about you, but that you would seek to justify it with this vomit? >Any man should be free to do what he will as long as it doesn't impede upon the free will of another.
Fucking nonsense, free will is not sacred.

So kill people who grow their own weed too? Im not saying violence is never acceptable, I'm saying you shouldn't care that someone uses a plant that naturally occurs. Weed isn't some man made drug and it has proven medical benefits. Honeslty just because you can be jesus or stalin doesn't mean you HAVE to be. You can find a middle ground instead of going all the way to the right or left. It took me a long time to realize that.

What puts you in the position to make that call? How are your made up beliefs any more real than mine? Free will is sacred. You don't have the right to force someone to live the way you see fit. Honestly if it wasn't for hemp this country wouldn't be what it is today. Cotton was the new hemp nigger

It doesn't need to be justified, its a fucking plant. If it shouldn't be around it wouldn't grow.

Not that I am against these either, but realise what you are saying when you say 'just a plant Xdddd'

so basically death cities?
we send the diseased and defunct to work until death, in a city of walking corpses, but they're free to do literally anything because fuck it they're condemned anyway.

i like that idea.

I wouldn't see a problem with psychedelic mushrooms growing in public, they already do in california anyways and we don't have an epidemic. Cocaine doesn't occur in powdered form naturally and I don't see a problem with chewing the leaves. Opiates made in a lab are evil but naturally occurring ones are safe to use and have medical benefits without the pharma added side effects. Poppy tea isn't a problem, neither is opium if used responsibly. A drug addict is degenerate no matter how you slice it but using drugs for occasional recreation of pain relief shouldn't be a problem.

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA you fucking loser. Enslaved niggers and conquered injuns felt the same way, congratulations on your new-found spiritual brethren.

It wouldn't be so bad for them knowing they are all in the same barrel. It would be a city within a city just for them. They could reinfect each other and create super aids in peace until all the people infected ended up dead.

We killed ourselves by being lazy you cunt.

Top fucking kek, if it is so insignificant why are you so desperately defending it?

Surrender or die, user.

But answering your question, yes I definitely should care when it spreads like a plague among the youth and makes it docile, lazy and complacent. Weed has exactly the same effect as videogames, pornography and anime which together are the reason nobody cares about anything anymore and arguably what has made the white man so easy to cuck and brainwash in Europe without the most basic resistance. Why care about the economy, the jew, the extinction of your race and the widespread degeneracy that is killing your society when you can just distract yourself with drugs or 'entertainment'.

It gets to the point where faggots like you start prioritizing the continued availability of your medium for escapism over the actual problems that are faced by our nations, because you KNOW that as long as you get your daily fix it will be easy to ignore said problems. This is decay, this is degeneracy, and I swear to God I will fight the spread of it with word and bullet even if I have to hunt the last one of you decadent faggots down and hang them from their own entrails.

Pray to Kek that Trump wins, for your sake.

I can't believe you would support a society so lazy it needs slaves. How did anyone think bringing primitive man into modern society would end any other way? Also the democrats were the slave owners, maybe the forces that wanted america to fail new down the line that infesting the states with blacks would lead to trouble. They gave us permanent crime and got rich.

What? Seriously wtf, now you're just damage controlling, try to be intellectually honest. Only an extremely small, privileged minority ever owned slaves you git, the rest of the White South was sweating in the fields working their fingers to the bone.

Have you ever thought that it would be a problem if it wasn't glamorized? Legalized and not glamorized. It could grow in the wild just as any other plant. Honestly its not the video games thats ruining kids its the parents letting their kids become addicts.

You need to nip addictive personalities in the bud from childhood, its not the drugs fault. Its the lack of will in an addict. Im defending it because its a plant.

Im not damage controlling shit. You can't deny our fate would be different if slavery hadn't been a thing.

Kill yourself.

No on everything, except 53, 54, and 66, those get a yes. If it raises taxes in or bonds in any way, vote against it.

Wow user all this big talk on this board about ideals and shit and you don't believe in self control? Honestly its easy not to get addicted to weed. Just because you are a weakling and blame the drugs doesn't mean its true. The addict has to become one through their own choosing.

Agreed but can we ban tobacco and alcohol too? They're just as degenerate.

Rope is your destiny.

It was the same in Maryland. Do you want to borrow [tens of millions] to fix roads, sewers, improve schools, etc. so we can spend more of your tax dollars on more jew-managed programs for blacks in baltimore? They should be written like: Do you want [$xx.xx] taken out of your paycheck every week next year to pay for [project/program].

Are you saying its impossible to be a recreational drug user? How do you even get it in your head people are that weak? Are YOU unable to moderate so now just hate all intoxication?

...

Why can't people be allowed to make their own decisions about what they consume? Why would you want the government to enforce what people can consume? Why not let the states individually decide based on their citizens instead of blanketing the country in a law that fits your world view.

...

we are just playing with you

What does two replies have anything to do with what I said? You know just because someone uses they are not an addict. You sound like an AA worker. If a man has a beer is he an alcoholic?

People are actually able to recreationally consume drugs and rerun to baseline and continue living. Just because someone smokes a bowl doesn't mean they suddenly have a compulsion to smoke every five minutes.

Oh good i was about to kill myself on cam to show y'all I'm right

So know you're just going to ignore 3/4s of what I said in

It's okay though, you'll just get smugs from now on.

If you don't know how to drink responsibility you are an immature man child with no will power whatsoever.

Nigger I read your post. Just because I support weed legalization doesn't mean i don't care about other politics. This isn't about me and having my escape. Under current law I have access to cannabis already and under 64 I would be able to have LESS in public than I can now. This is about fig hint for something that has proven medical benefits so people don't only have the option of pharmaceuticals.

I can care about more than one issue you idiot. Im not even a daily user.

fig hint= fighting

Another thing
You idiot I'm voting for trump first of all and second, are you just going to go door to door with a rope and a gun delivering "justice".

Sure user

...

I can see it now. You and a few friends in a shit car with shit guns rolling around knocking on doors trying to inspect peoples homes then execute those who are "degenerates" (Whatever you decide that currently includes at the time)

This

People are fucking stupid if they just vote no on items they don't know. Just leave it blank if you don't know

Yes you can stop anytime you want. it's called having self control. I smoke weed once every few months with friends if you think that's immoral or something that needs to be regulated by the government you are pants on head retarded. Not everyone that smokes weed is some 420 blaze it every day faggot.

This
tbh the hipster dab culture is repulsive, so is the smoke everyday culture.

...

beer is full of estrogens. Hops itself has a component that has more estrogenic effects than estrogen itself.

troll plz

Like i said

You can't honestly believe that user, I'm calling you out

Yes, user, that is exactly what me and many other people on this board are going to do and no amount of kvetching from you degenerates is going to save you.

You say you can stop anytime you want right? Then do it now you fucking faggot.

Reported for degeneracy.

I don't use daily and i like to use every couple weeks. I don't feel like taking it out of my life completely because I LIKE IT.
You never drink user? No smokes? You are above all vice? You don't ever jack off? You don't ever eat sugar?
Wow user thats incredible.

What else should I have said at this point? If you would read the damn thread you would see I've been arguing through the whole damn thing. Don't try and stick some bullshit on me faggot. You fucking know how addiction works and so does everyone else. That green text was pure fucking bait.

You niggers are fucking embarrassing me in front of the rest of Holla Forums here with this shit.

Not a single one of those, faggot. Though I'm not sure how jacking off (without porn) is a vice, I'm on Nofap for the testosterone boost. I wouldn't expect from other people what I can't do myself.

You're a weak piece of shit and deserve to die. Sage because of derailed thread.

All the people who are saying anyone who uses in any capacity is an addict are exactly like the fucking liberals who say addiction is a disease. Weak people who wont take accountability for their own actions so, like trannies, try and convince everyone to join their delusion of being a victim. You have to pretend you have no control over your use so you feel better about your addictions. Then when you quit you enforce your delusion on others by saying they are addicts no matter what and CONVINCING weak minded people that they are so they get addicted to AA meetings instead.

Go fuck yourself you weak willed pussies

How exactly, if that is even true? How is someone weak for wanting to enjoy the effects of intoxication once in a while anyway? What do you do with all your time that makes you so much better? Just because I smoke weed my life just has to be a disaster with ripple effects on society? Its not possible that I smoke occasionally AND pay taxes?

...

The cultures of the world that led to everything in the world you now enjoy utilized intoxicating agents since the dawn of time. What makes you smarter than the history of man? Are you saying man kind as a whole is just degenerate?
Thats pretty edgy.

``woooosh``

My decision isn't based on bernie sanders. How is it a bad thing to limit political spending by corporations and unions? Don't we want trump to do similar shit to take money out of politics? Are you simply against it because bernie is for it? Thats no way to be user, contrarians suck. hipster is just a euphemism for contrarian

Why does every weed debate make some people act like it's a life and death matter? It's almost as if there's some kind of addiction at play here.

Because if pharma is allowed to get away with banning a substance that has proven medical benefits it will be bad for all of us. Do you want to live in a world where your only medicinal option is pharma? People don't only use it to get high.

write in bernie

Cry more faggot

I actually like you.

But alcohol is totally different, right guys?

Fucking California.

In Colorado and Montana, every vote we had there were propositions trying to copy CA laws. Just now when I was voting for Trump I had to vote against some copycat California law called "Marsy's Law". Always with the emotional names and always with the bullshit.

Yes on 62, no on 66. Death penalty should be reserved only for public office holders convicted of treason and high crimes against the People of the united States. It should be public, too.

Oh yes, and those sentenced to life in prison should be on display in a zoo-like fashion for the public to come and gawk at.
Only to lifers should this be done.

I thought in America you could excuse yourself from work legally to go vote.

I'd support the death penalty if I trusted the justice system.


Nope.

ballotpedia.org/California_2016_ballot_propositions
I was using this site for reference on the California props unless there's a better site to use. (I think it was one of the first results on startpage.)


Why's that? Wouldn't requiring a vote for large projects be a good thing? We don't need more wasteful spending on failed projects. I've heard that there's no clause for emergency relief funds, is that why?

Wouldn't limiting corporate spending on campaigns be good?

I was just gonna skip this one, but why no?


I'm skipping them since the schools no longer affect me. Plus, I no longer live in the city I went to school in so I don't know who these people are. I'm sure if the parents give enough of a shit about their kids' education they'll make the best choice for themselves. They probably won't.


Why would someone who's concerned about getting STDs go into a career that involves lots of unprotected sex with people whom they've probably never met?
I'm all for messing with the porn industry, but if people fuck like rabbits already, how would this slow or stop the spread of disease?