Why aren't politicians required to understand basic science before running?

I will bet you cold, hard, American cash that if you were actually up on stage and had to give us concrete facts about global warming you would shit yourself.

He understands it. He just knows it's wrong.

He knows what he is saying is wrong or are you saying Vaccines actually cause autism and love literal jewish tricks?

lol die

Great scientific argument

Everyone knows you're wrong, sorry.

About what?
So you are saying vaccines do cause autism?

I'm pretty sure they do. Still, it's better than someone I know whose kid actually died after taking vaccines.

Well you are wrong and so is Trump
That's an obvious logical fallacy.

For them let that play the principal part which we have persuaded them to accept as the dictates of science (theory). It is with this object in view that we are constantly, by means of our press, arousing a blind confidence in these theories. The intellectuals of the GOYIM will puff themselves up with their knowledges and without any logical verification of them will put into effect all the information available from science, which our AGENTUR specialists have cunningly pieced together for the purpose of educating their minds in the direction we want.

Reported for spam.

Nice downvote user. But it doesn't make you right.

What kind of slide / distraction BS thread is this?

GO CORRECT THE RECORD SOMEWHERE ELSE

Reported for spam.

reported. absolute shit cuckchan tier thread. Fuck off OP.

...

Go ahead user. Keep spamming it all you want but why don't you make an argument in the mean time?

Same for you too.

sage

Because then America would be the 4th reich right now. .webm is you OP.

Explain yourself then.

Vaccines don't cause autism. There is no proof that they do and all evidence to show otherwise was started by a doctor to sue with.
Politicians should know more about basic science.

sage

Didn't watch your video.

I'm voting for Trump because he wants to build a border wall, deport millions of spics and ban of mudshit immigration.

His presence in the election has also shifted the Overton Window dramatically to the right to the point that the mainstream media is actually reporting on frog-worshiping nazis on the internet rigging the election for Trump.

Whether or not Trump is the next Hitler, he's been a positive force in bringing the right-wing into the mainstream. Trivial shit like abortion and global warming couldn't be less relevant to me.

No, because there is no evidence to link vaccines with autism.

sage

Tell us more about how GMO's are evil and how gender is a social construct.

How do I prove a negative user?

They aren't.

sage

So you are saying I should believe Vaccines cause autism without any evidence?

sage

So there is no evidence that vaccines cause autism but I should believe they do because why?

Is it because Trump says they do?

sage

I was vacinated and I'm sitting alone in the middle of the night on Holla Forums.

So where is the evidence?

I don't think "vaccines cause autism" is the argument, obviously there are a multitude of different ways to make vaccines. I know in my country we don't use American vaccines as they aren't considered as safe. The argument is SOME vaccines cause autism.

I don't think its been studied thoroughly enough to say and things we KNOW cause autism are increasing. Frankly, we should work on those issues and gathering more data on the vaccine question. This is one time I'll say a moderate position is most wise.

You know where it is. You reject it off-hand without disproving it. Where is your disproof of the evidence?