Why we trust Donald Trump’s accusers but didn’t believe Bill Clinton’s

When Donald Trump brought three women who have accused Bill Clinton of sexual misconduct to the second presidential debate last Sunday, his aides said he had three goals. He wanted to throw Hillary Clinton off her game by putting them in her sightline (although the debate committeenixed his original plan to seat them in his VIP box). He wanted to remind voters that Bill Clinton’s presidency had been marked by accusations far more serious than the acts Trump described to Billy Bush on the “Access Hollywood” bus. And he wanted to reinforce a central belief of the most energetic anti-Clinton forces: that Hillary was deeply complicit in the ruin of the women who accused her husband.

Never has a political strategy been so shortsighted. Within days, women began to come forward to accuse Trump of the acts he had described on the bus.

archive.is/MTfZY

Other urls found in this thread:

storify.com/weev/duck-enlightenment-s-final-tweet-spree
archive.is/Qtcto
nypost.com/2016/10/15/the-hillary-emails-reveal-a-life-full-of-deceit/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

It is baffling how fucking retarded the media is

And brainwashed liberals have told me they would rather have war with russia than have trump because of this
They also call me a red scare conspirator for saying Russia wants to have nuclear war with us.

3 months actually. November 8th is when he's declared the winner. January 20th is when he actually takes the reigns.

You are a fucking dipshit if you actually think that. Russia is telling the US what is going to happen if they opt for certain idiotic strategies. Attack Assads army, face Russian air defense. Attack Russian jets, face air raids on ships. Drop nukes, face extinction.

At no point in time has Russia ever threatend the US with nuclear war or has made any move in that direction. The only dipshits constantly escalating the conflict is the USA, especially verbally. Normal men work in the Russian administration, baffled by the shitshow that is the presidential election. A country has to be collectively insane to even consider Clinton electable. The Russians acknowledge this and prepare for the worst.

Is this the Washington Shitpost throwing Trump some rope?

I meant elected, so thanks for clarifying user

you know there is going to be nuclear war with Hillary
This is what Hillary wants to do
This is what Obongo wants to do

I know, but it doesnt mean Russia wants any of this. Russia, China, Asia in general, they know the time of the US empire is up. They can sit this out and deny them their goals, stop their trade deals, their resource grabs, bind them in never ending conflicts and eventually see them crumble from within. They have no need for nuclear destruction. The US on the other hand is going out of power. Whether they are doing it peacefully with Trump, returning to the nation state and fixing their inner problems or go out with a boom with a Clinton adminstration is their choice. The game ends either way. The American empire is in rapis decline.

I hate the press so much.

No, this is great, now we have a cudgel for cuckservative men and women. They need to hold their nose and vote agenda over principles, it's what those commie fucks in the dinducrat clique are doing.

I think that the media has realized that they have gone too far and that their bias is so upfront,that,yes they are back peddling.

The liberal media is losing what ever credibility they had.
they think that trump has lost now,so they can ease up.
There might be a link somewhere that shows the Clinton camp coached these women to come forward weeks before the 2005 video was released,
If any link is found,this could be the smoking gun to impeach Clinton if she wins

m

So it's the "if this didn't happen then everything must've not happened" shilling technique again, glad to see you applying it to something other than the holocaust for once.

I fucking lost it when they brought up Gloria Steinem and Nate spencer (or whatever the fuck his name is). This whole article is shit.

Spencer and his buddy drugged up a whit chick, and raped her in his apartment. He even hired a private investigator that harassed the woman he raped. His friend, and copartner in birth of a nation, was sentenced to fucking jail over that shit. They later overturned it because 'muh racism' and the women killed herself in 2012. Then they have the balls to put a rape in the film that isn't even based on any factual evidence, it's just gore porn for the niggers to fuel their hatred of whites.

Steinem is the motherfuckering rat in all of this. Former CIA agent that did marxist workshops in Europe during the hippie era, jew, ivory tower type that supported all the rave about slut walks, rape culture, white/male privilege, listen and believe, vagina monologing feminist gatekeeper.

Now, it's the shit they leave out that pisses me off, creating context in such an illegitimate way. When Cosby came up, we kept hearing about 'back then, it was impossible as a woman to admit you were raped and expect prosecution to go through, so women stayed quiet out of fear, etc.'. Or whatever, it's been said in so many ways that I'm not going to drag it out. And I do give them the benefit of doubt when you hear about cases decades old. Cases go cold, lack of evidence, people get old and forget. But these cases with Bill Clinton have been around and brought up for years now. Hell, we even have that video of him groping that women he was sitting next to. Everyone was falling off their chairs waiting for Trump to bring all this up, but he knew the new smear tactic is to pile on alleged incidents, use personal anecdotes, not even circumstantial fucking evidence, and bury the target. And now this shit where oh, but all that with Clinton didn't count because muh nuts and sluts. Show some consistency in your beliefs and arguments faggots.

The washington post has really gone off the deep end this election cycle. The whole media has. But it's this disingenuous part of it where they present 'factual' information, but they omit every other critical detail like this is credible journalism. It marginalizes real issues, and keeps spinning people around in these manufactured, waste of fucking time scandals that distract people away from shit like Russia is about to start knocking our aircraft out of the sky for being a tier-1 asshole and the economy is in its death throes or even better yet everyone is fucked and this nation is about to rip itself apart but, yea, let's keep talking about potty mouth Trump

Because Bill's accusers were demonstrability threatened by Hillary into silence out fear for their lives. They have and have been advocating for years in the hopes of getting justice. Trump's accusers have come out of the wood work this week after decades of silence and obscurity. And just in time to make a 'convenient' splash during a presidential race.

storify.com/weev/duck-enlightenment-s-final-tweet-spree
Gas the press.

Of course the media will take unsubstantiated accusations against Trump seriously. Their shareholders will destroy them if they don't. But accusations against a former president who got impeached over this shit? "Not true"
-Media 2016

...

Not retarded. They are shills. Probably most of them are dumb as hell, too, but don't think this comes from simple stupidity.

NY Post: Leaked emails reval Hillary Clinton's life of deceit
archive.is/Qtcto
nypost.com/2016/10/15/the-hillary-emails-reveal-a-life-full-of-deceit/

Is the NY Post the only mainstream publication pushing the emails?

They're using the excuse of these being politically correct times to show why Trump is being persecuted.

The media are just trying to find any reason other than their bias to show why they are attacking Trump

If that's is all the "dirt" they can pull out on Trump (without exposing themselves…) i would go with Trump.

Fuck, it's just a bunch of words.

IIRC NY Post endorsed Trump.

Cumskin detected

nothing worse than a retard resurrecting a stillborn meme

Because Bill is a good goy and Trump isn't.