Is he right? 'Cause the original does look like shit to me

Is he right? 'Cause the original does look like shit to me.

What a retard. Sage because furries are filth.

We already have a thread that features this tweet.

both are shit

Yeah. All comes down to uncanny valley. If you're going to make it look super detailed, make it look more animal, at least. Don't give it soulless human eyes.

I didn't know they'd made a Legends of Chima comic.

That's way fucking better looking. Simplified, straight forward, good looking, and even has the fur clearly there over just a pink human body with a lion head. Which is a trap most furry artists fall into.

Kill yourself.

I'm sure you're fucking around, but if you want to know, it's a Red Sonja comic.
It's terrible, don't look into it. Written by Gail Simone, and at the climax Red Sonja is killed only so she can be resurrected in a different time so Simone can destroy everything her character ever stood for by creating an all-new (and incredibly boring) backstory for her.

One on the left looks like nightmare fuel, one on the right looks like gay furbait.

Here's an idea, draw the characters in their native style or a refined version of it. Also don't insert gender politics or politics in general into your comic about a cartoon cat from the 70's.

Then why are you here?

To laugh at you.

Hey Hijinks

...

With the Flintstones, it's more the realism is more natural since the characters are human.

This shit is just a freak show.

It would probably help if you actually used mountain lion references.

And? try that with cartoon characters and you will get deformed monsters.

epic racist pictures you deserve that 88

gotta love that reality bending pigeon that sits on the bench and also is behind the clouds

...

Don't call him that, His name's Powergirl Autist.

He has seen some shit.

...

user, what are you doing?

You forgot to sage

Why have you done this?

Ignore and report, shitposter gonna shitpost.

...

Oh congratulations, now it looks like generic furry porn.

It's because not only can these fuckers not draw they're all so lazy and technically inept none of them goddamn ink their shitty sketches.

People told this shit was to go away

The super-detailed look is kinda creepy, tbh.

It's par the course for DC books, or mainstream comics in general. Deadlines are a bitch.

Also, BTW, all of this garbage comes out March 29th. There better be a storytime.

...

The trick is to DRAW IT LIKE FUCKING SNAGGLEPUSS.

They can't even find a single artist who can draw anywhere close to the style of Ed Benedict. Art as a practical skill is dead.

Quit pretending those Happas mean anything, when the majority of mongoloids are pan-faced subhumans, through, and through. They wish they were white, and that's just disgusting.

Still an improvement.

I think most of the good artists go into porn, furry porn, or make their own comics these days, since comic books pay like shit, have deadlines and editors and shit, and tend to be cancelled without warning.

I didn't had to try to fit in that hard in your mom pussy

Let me guess: You're also one of those people who call porn producers and yell at them that this is not what "real women" look like, and they should hire more cellulitis-covered cows to more resemble "actual demographic"?
Because obviously we don't want characters in our cartoons to be pretty, we need them to be realistic and represent "the actual population".
kindly fuck off to tumblr.

Cartoon characters are supposed to be ugly though.

No realistically ugly but comically ugly.

...

Anime characters do not look white.

I really hope that was made just to exclaim how ridiculous the other anons claim is.

...

the math is lost on me
is the point of this picture to show that white brunettes or readheads don't engage in interracial relationships?

Hey Holla Forums

i thought the weird uncanny valley look was intentional? to contrast that a giant talking pink cat to the humans among the crowd?

maybe i'm giving the artist more credit

Who even knows anymore.

If it was supposed to be horrifying, it worked.

it's supposed to be saying it's always either a coalburning white chick, or a white guy with yellow fever. the person is totally unable to draw, though.

hey reddit

He cheated by not drawing the lines over the picture as they were in the original. All he has proven is that having good line art is more important than good detail.

There's been entire damn film made recently which proves you can have tonnes of detail in the characters and still be expressive so his argument is shit.

No, his argument is sound.

In the Furry Breeding Ground movie, notice that while they're detailed, those features always take a back seat to the important stuff, like the eyes and mouth.

In the DC version, instead of being a feature, the detail becomes detriment. It takes focus away from the eyes and mouth, leaving Snagglepuss looking like a freak-show.

Compare DC's new Snagglepuss to Jeff Parker's Tawky Tawny. You can see that while being more realistic, the detail is restrained and doesn't distract from the character's expressions.

He would have a point if what the artist was going for was attractive furries. I think the creepy look of the characters is intentional though. He's not doing this for people to jerk off to.

But why are they making the characters look horrifying? There's plenty of options between, "Furrybait," and, "Slowly melting wax animal with hyperrealistic eyes."

dat ferengi

Just posting to remind the resident weebs that fapping to 2d is degenerate and they would never fuck them irl.

Basically everything. She literally killed Red Sonja to make an OC that she can call Red Sonja who has none of the properties of old Red Sonja.
So basically it's just not her at all. Her backstory is also boring as hell. She's royalty or some shit. Finds out her sister had purposely ordered the kill of her husband (and tried to kill her) bc reasons, and seeks revenge. It's fucking stupid.

i'd never understand why, if you have an "original" story, why use an already existing brand.

I mean, it's going to suck anyway and people are going to not buy it. At least don't spit in other people's legacy

…you're just saying that good line-art is more important than good detail.

The tweet was claiming that the problem with the comic was the detail, when the real problem is that the line-art is shit. If the guy wanted to prove that that the problem wasn't with the line-art he wouldn't have completely changed it in his improvement.

Yeah these people don't ink, they're lazy but also the can't commit to a single line because they're shit artists. If they had to pick one line of their sketchy mess and stick with it they know their lack of skill would be clear. They hide behind their garbage mess of scribbles to look more proficient than they really are.

Weeaboos don't really exist anymore, and were never associated with being sexually attracted to anime characters.

A very poorly thought out art style, probably, and trying to make detail do the job of design.

Possibly desperately trying to avoid the stereotypical furry art style and going way too far the other way. Or not even having done any research into how to draw anthro characters. Like how Hollywood giant robots nearly always look shit (Bayformers, Power Rangers, about half of Pacific Rim) because they refuse to do any research into how games and anime have made memorable and well liked designs for decades.

I hope you're joking, faggot

Toning it down was alright I guess, giving it bedroom eyes was not. Isnt that one of the signs that all the artists draws is porn?

Actually I take it back, the eyes just need to pop less on the right side and it would be fine.

How else can we react when /a/ is laughing at us again?

Report and ignore?

...