“Age of Consent”

So one could post hard CP? Or does this only apply to local rules and local mods?

two different meanings

delete yourself

...

If the right answer should be puberty: It is more about 12 in boys and 10 in girls.

I really don't talk to Dys or any other vols. We don't discuss things like meta or Holla Forums politics. We interact just like we are all anonymous.

We know you have a tox circlejerk

God has spoken

Age of consent should be marriage. Marriage meetings and courting should begin when puberty does.

AoC should be 14, however a half-age-plus-7 law should be enacted to protect these vulnerable individuals from creeps like you. Actually no, keep it at 18 so as to discourage unwed teenage motherhood.

Was >>7719810 child porn/adolescent porn? I have seen it but couldn't estimate the age.

T-Thanks shlomo

(Only small part.)

Didn't see it myself. But if it was deleted, probably. Of course it could of been those retarded "pretend I'm disgusting" images.

...

yes

DATAMINING THREAD DO NOT REPLY

?

Tbh I am not really sure that one understands under “age of consent”, but I think it is the age from what there is no strict age limit for sex anymore. So in this scenario the “age of consent” is not 14.

1. It is not 18 in the most countries, not even in the most US states, look at the first map.
2. This will probably not work. Look at the maps. In Europe the “age of consent” is lower generally, and so is the teenage birth rate.
Germany, where I live, has an “age of consent” of 14, but a much lower teenage birth rate than the US. Of course this is not because of this law, but because of things like better sexual education (no abstinence only shit), but it doesn't seem to have a big begative impact either. And why not just forbid sex without contraception for minors?

(The first map if for the “age of consent” and the second for the teenage birth rate (age 15-19) per 1000 women.)

Literally everything is datamining, we should never express opinions and only wordlessly share content others have made in fear of our security

The AoC should simply be 16.
It's the right age for a person to being able to make their own decision.
Anything of a younger age can be manipulated by older adults.
It's a simple, self explanatory law that should apply everywhere.

Why not just rule out manipulation for having sex with someone younger than 16?

In America and many other 16 countries on that map, it's illegal for an adult to actually have sex with the 16 year old, resulting in many more 19 year old sex offenders than there ought to be. The half-age-plus-7 law would protect those chads while still penalizing the creeps like it's supposed to.

kys

That what is what AoC exists for, people younger than 16 aren't able to make such decisions.
They simply cannot consent and be fully responsible of their decisions which can lead to older adults being able to manipulate younger children for sex, it's called statutory rape for a reason.

Source? Close-in-age exemptions do not change the age of consent, if I see this right. I can say for Germany that there is no strict maximum age if you are at least 14, although there are some other restrictions.

That's stupid. You just need to make it illegal to manipulate children into having sex, you don't need to make sex with them illegal altogether.

Your logic is invalid, you dumb inbred.
You cannot prevent manipulation of children for sex if they cannot consent and make such decisions.

What exactly makes children unable to consent?

I honestly wouldn't know.
Probably because of their children, that their brains aren't fully developed.

That is the defining factor of a child, is being unable to make descisions for themselves. Anyone who can do that is an adult.

Wut? You have just argued for an “age of consent” of 16 and claimed that children can't consent and you can't even reason it?

But what kind of decision-making is necessary to have sex? I mean doesn't one know whether one want to have sex or not? And what should be wrong if one want to have sex and then does it?

The statement "i honestly wouldn't know" was obviously sarcastic.
I already stated my arguments that they're simply children, that their brains aren't fully developed.

And what specific properties of the not fully developed brain of children makes them unable to consent?

I'm not a specialized in the human brain to give you "the specific properties of the not fully developed brain".
If you're that interested you can google it.

Children can consent to sex with each other.
Animals can consent to sex with each other, even though they will never attain the cognitive thinking abilities of an adult human.
Sex is a basic biological instinct that does not require sophisticated thinking abilities to comprehend.

BLESS THE RAPEFUGEES

So you can't reason the position that children can't consent? I mean you must be able to tell what specifically makes them unable if you claim that they are.

Well we live in a civilized world.
If there wouldn't any law against drug abuse, rape, manipulation than there wouldn't be an established civilized society.
The Age of Consent is a simple factor that takes in part maintaining a civilized society.

It's plain obvious science that the brains of children aren't fully developed.
Your only asking unproductive questions that don't serve any point.

What exactly makes someone with a not fully developed brain unable to consent.

(Btw the brain only gets fully developed with up to 25 years.)

?

Your only repeating yourself of how you're unaware of such basic facts.
Sorry to disappoint, but i don't wont to make a whole essay specifically about the human brain.

okay I'm done talking to this retard. have a nice day.

Not necessary. Just explain in a few sentences what specific traits of children make them unable to consent.

Oops, after
it was supposed to be something like

Much in denial i suppose?
If you're so proudly secure about that the AoC doesn't have to do anything with establishing a civilized society you could have explained yourself.

They lack the ability to comprehend the social and cultural implications of having sex.

Emotionally and physiologically they can obviously enjoy and immensely benefit from it, however we as humans do not exist in a void.

In societies where sex is not given much importance, there is no need for advanced cognitive thinking abilities. In modern western societies, however, sex is very important and children cannot understand the vast implications of sexuality in our culture.

Most historical civilizations did not have an age of consent. The age of consent previously only existed in Anglo Saxon civilizations and was only recently forced upon the rest of the planet. Literally forced and there is still a lot of resistance to these sexually repressed moralizing Puritan fuck ups and their ridiculous laws that objectively do more harm than good.

fuck off pedo

fuck off radical feminist

This thread has become obsolete.
Time to move on to another thread to meaninglessly argue about obvious facts .

Even if there was no law, this does not mean that it was socially accepted. In the most societies the onset of puberty was considered the age from which on you are ready for sex.

(((obvious facts)))

Its shit

Whenever she has her period

> Should were be exceptions?
if she's retarded

It was used to be like this in the most cultures.

age of consent can never disappear or be lowered ever again
because we live in a world where pedos can hide in the crowd
instead of being identified by the tribe or village and thrown in the bog while strangled by their own guts, as nature intended

It amazes me how our culture tokk an 180 spin, when it comes to child nudity and sexuality. Not too long ago, in the 60's and 70's, child nuudity was perfectly fine. Go and look at the very first Penthouse magazines. The models featuring there were mostly aged 15, and up. Child nudity in movies was also something very normal. It was only after the 80's, that child nudity became a taboo, for God knows what reason.

True, but because it was governed by society (and not a government), every case was treated on a case by case basis (as it should be). People have different thinking capabilities (and, therefore, understandings of the implications of their actions).
Get rid of AoC, get a society which socially shames unfit pairings, but promotes young good pairings, for a healthy, childbearing society.

Here in Germany you actually can have sex with a 14 year old, although there are exceptions. You can't marry them though.

I think it should be replaced with an "IQ of consent". Anyone falling below a certain IQ would be unable to provide legal consent to anything, and could not access those things (including drivers licenses, jobs, the internet, cellphones, colleges, voting rights, and alcohol) without direct supervision by someone who was of that minimum IQ or higher. That person would have to be willing to undertake any and all responsibility for any actions that the person of lower IQ engaged in.

AoC should definitely be 15. not too young and not too old, the grey area of age

AoC should be whatever this girl is

aww its gone

That girl is an inbred retard.
Age of consent should be an inbred retard?
The longer I think about it, the more I become convinced that an "IQ of consent" is the way to go.

the hell are you on about, gay community?

Your IQ.
You don't even know where you are posting.

kys, scum

post more IQ midget

this

ist her new name "IQ midget"

if you say so

zhenya who? amirite?

she is negro?

she looks negro, but is from Puitn-land

...

God, so ulgy

yeah…

the only reason she's at all cute at the moment is because she's a little girl. when she goes through puberty she's going to look like an actual monster.

...

And she will lose all interest to pedos

where you at

im right here, user

wrong!

not ox

...

Behind every picture, there is pain

You said that same thing yesterday.

it's true